Peak Hip Adduction Moment Research Articles

Comparison of Walking Biomechanics After Physical Therapist–Led Care or Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: A Secondary Analysis From a Randomized Controlled Trial

Background: Femoroacetabular impingement syndrome is characterized by chondrolabral damage and hip pain. The specific biomechanics used by people with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome during daily activities may exacerbate their symptoms. Femoroacetabular impingement syndrome can be treated nonoperatively or surgically; however, differential treatment effects on walking biomechanics have not been examined. Purpose: To compare the 12-month effects of physical therapist–led care or arthroscopy on trunk, pelvis, and hip kinematics as well as hip moments during walking. Study Design: Secondary analysis of multi-centre, pragmatic, two-arm superiority randomized controlled trial subsample; Level of evidence, 1. Methods: A subsample of 43 participants from the Australian Full randomised controlled trial of Arthroscopic Surgery for Hip Impingement versus best cONventional (FASHIoN trial) underwent gait analysis and completed the International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-33) at both baseline and 12 months after random allocation to physical therapist–led care (personalized hip therapy; n = 22; mean age 35; 41% female) or arthroscopy (n = 21; mean age 36; 48% female). Changes in trunk, pelvis, and hip biomechanics were compared between treatment groups across the gait cycle using statistical parametric mapping. Associations between changes in iHOT-33 and changes in hip kinematics across 3 planes of motion were examined. Results: As compared with the arthroscopy group, the personalized hip therapy group increased its peak hip adduction moments (mean difference = 0.35 N·m/body weight·height [%] [95% CI, 0.05-0.65]; effect size = 0.72; P = .02). Hip adduction moments in the arthroscopy group were unchanged in response to treatment. No other between-group differences were detected. Improvements in iHOT-33 were not associated with changes in hip kinematics. Conclusion: Peak hip adduction moments were increased in the personalized hip therapy group and unchanged in the arthroscopy group. No biomechanical changes favoring arthroscopy were detected, suggesting that personalized hip therapy elicits greater changes in hip moments during walking at 12-month follow-up. Twelve-month changes in hip-related quality of life were not associated with changes in hip kinematics.

Effects of Walking With a Cane on Frontal Plane Hip Joint Loading in Patients With Late-Stage Unilateral Hip Osteoarthritis

ObjectiveTo investigate the effects of walking with a cane on frontal plain bilateral hip joint loading in patients with late-stage unilateral hip osteoarthritis (OA). DesignNonrandomized experimental design. SettingUrban inpatient hospital. ParticipantsAdults (men, n=10; women, n=17) with osteoarthritis who were scheduled for total hip arthroplasty (N=27). InterventionGait with and without a T-cane was assessed using a 3-dimensional motion analysis system. Main Outcome MeasuresPeak hip adduction moment and hip adduction moment impulse, vertical ground reaction force, and ground reaction force impulse were assessed under 4 different conditions: OA side vs non-OA side with non-cane gait, OA side vs non-OA side with cane gait, non-cane vs cane gait on OA side, and non-cane vs cane gait on non-OA side. The lateral trunk lean angle in the stance phase on both sides was compared between with and without a cane. Pain during walking with and without a cane was also determined using a visual analog scale (0=no pain; 100=most painful). ResultsWalking with a cane reduced the peak hip adduction moment from an average of 0.76 to 0.57 Nm/kg (reduction approximately 25%) and the mean hip adduction moment impulse from 50.58 to 42.78 Nm/kg (reduction approximately 15%) on the affected side. Walking with a cane reduced the peak ground reaction force from an average of 10.15 to 9.20 N/kg but did not markedly affect the mean ground reaction force impulse on the affected side. The mean impulse of vertical ground force and hip adduction moment on the nonaffected side with a T-cane was larger than that without a cane (940.4 vs 899.2, 73.7 vs 68.8, respectively), albeit without statistical significance. The mean lateral trunk lean angle on the affected side was 5.85±3.95 degrees with a non-cane gait and 4.46±2.66 degrees with a T-cane gait, showing a significant difference. Furthermore, walking with a cane was associated with a significant decrease in the visual analog scale of pain from 42.1 to 26.4. ConclusionThese findings indicate that walking with a cane reduces the load and pain on the affected hip joint. The effect of the cane on the trunk lean was small, but it is worth noting that walking with a cane may increase the load on the healthy side.

Larger hip external rotation motion is associated with larger knee abduction and internal rotation motions during a drop vertical jump

ABSTRACT Associations among hip motions, knee abduction and internal rotation motion during a drop vertical jump (DVJ), which increases the risk of anterior cruciate ligament injury, remain unclear. The purpose of this study was to examine associations among knee abduction, internal rotation and hip joint motions during a DVJ. Fifty-seven young female participants performed a DVJ from a 30-cm height. Hip and knee kinematics and kinetics were analysed using a three-dimensional motion analysis system and force plates. Multiple regression analysis showed that peak knee abduction angle was negatively associated with knee internal rotation and hip internal rotation excursions from initial contact (IC) to peak knee flexion, and positively associated with peak knee abduction moment (R2 = 0.465, P< 0.001). Peak knee internal rotation angle was negatively associated with the hip flexion excursion from IC to peak knee flexion and peak hip adduction moment (R2 = 0.194, P= 0.001). In addition, hip internal rotation excursion was negatively associated with knee abduction and internal rotation excursion from IC to 50 ms after IC. To avoid a large knee abduction and internal rotation motion during jump-landing training, it might be beneficial to provide landing instructions to avoid a large hip external rotation motion.

Impact of parity on biomechanical risk factors for knee OA initiation

BackgroundWomen are twice as likely as men to develop knee osteoarthritis (OA), and with it experience greater losses of physical function and disability. A change in the mechanical environment of the joint is a key initiating factor for knee OA. Differences in morphology, joint injury risk, and hormonal shifts in mid-life are often considered factors which increase OA risk for women. Pregnancy, a time of significant hormonal, morphological, and biomechanical change, has received comparably less attention. If morphological and biomechanical changes persist postpartum, this could increase OA risk for parous (childbearing) women. Research questionAre lower limb gait mechanics different between healthy nulliparous (non-childbearing) and parous (childbearing) women? MethodsTwenty-eight self-reported not pregnant female participants (14 parous, 14 nulliparous) were recruited for the study. Nulliparous participants had never given birth to a child. Parous participants had given birth to at least one full-term infant (37–42 weeks) without complications between one to five years before data collection. Motion capture of participants’ preferred, fast, and set (1.4 m/s) walking speeds was conducted. Repeated measures ANOVA were performed to test for significant group differences in joint kinematics and kinetics. ResultsThere was a significant main effect of group indicating a larger knee flexion angle at toe off (p = 0.0002), smaller knee extension moment at heel strike (p = 0.0006), smaller first peak knee flexion moment (p = 0.040), and smaller peak hip adduction moment for the parous group compared to the nulliparous group (p = 0.003). Static Q-angle did not differ between groups. SignificanceAlteration in mechanics from the habitual loading pattern are thought to increase risk of OA. Smaller knee moments in post-partum women could alter the mechanical stimulus to cartilage, and should be investigated in conjunction with cartilage health measures to determine the link with OA initiation.

Hip joint moments in symptomatic vs. asymptomatic people with mild radiographic hip osteoarthritis

Our primary objective was to examine external hip joint moments during walking in people with mild radiographic hip osteoarthritis (OA) with and without symptoms and disease-free controls. Three groups were compared (symptomatic with mild radiographic hip OA, n = 12; asymptomatic with mild radiographic hip OA, n = 13; OA-free controls, n = 20). Measures of the external moment (peak and impulse) in the sagittal, frontal and transverse plane during walking were determined. Variables were compared according to group allocation using mixed linear regression models that included individual gait trials, with group allocation as fixed effect and walking speed as a random effect. Participants with evidence of radiographic disease irrespective of symptoms walked 14–16% slower compared to disease-free controls (p = 0.002). Radiographic disease without symptoms was not associated with any altered measures of hip joint moment compared to asymptomatic OA-free controls once speed was taken into account (p ≥ 0.099). People with both mild radiographic disease and symptoms had lower external peak hip adduction moment (p = 0.005) and lower external peak internal rotation moment (p < 0.001) accounting for walking speed. Among angular impulses, only the presence of symptoms was associated with a reduced hip internal rotation impulse (p = 0.002) in the symptomatic group. Collectively, our observations suggest that symptoms have additional mechanical associations from radiographic disease alone, and provide insight into potential early markers of hip OA. Future research is required to understand the implications of modifying walking speed and/or the external hip adduction and internal rotation moment in people with mild hip OA.

Sex and limb differences during a single-leg cut with body borne load

BackgroundMilitary personnel don body borne loads that produce maladaptive lower limb biomechanics, increasing risk of musculoskeletal injury during common training tasks. Female personnel have over twice the injury risk as males, but it is unknown if a sex dimorphism in lower limb biomechanics exists during common training-related tasks. Research QuestionTo determine whether lower limb biomechanics exhibited during a single-leg cut with military body borne loads differ between sexes. MethodsSixteen females and 20 males had lower limb biomechanics quantified during five single-leg cuts off each limb with four loads (20, 25, 30 and 35 kg). Each cut required participants run 4 m/s, before planting their foot on a force platform and cut 45° towards the opposite limb. Lower limb biomechanics related to musculoskeletal injury were submitted to a repeated measures ANOVA to test for main and interaction effects of load, sex, and limb. ResultsDuring the cut, load increased peak proximal anterior tibial shear force (p < 0.001) and peak hip flexion (p = 0.010) and knee abduction (p = 0.045) moments, but decreased peak knee flexion angle (p = 0.032). Females exhibited greater peak proximal anterior tibial shear (p = 0.014), and peak hip adduction (p < 0.001) and knee external rotation (p = 0.001) moment than males. Dominant limb exhibited larger peak hip adduction (p = 0.002); whereas, the non-dominant limb exhibited greater peak hip internal (p = 0.002) and knee external (p = 0.007) rotation moments. Only the non-dominant limb increased peak knee abduction moment (p = 0.001) with additional load. SignificanceDuring the cut, adding body borne load produced maladaptive biomechanics that may increase knee musculoskeletal injury risk. Load increased peak proximal tibial shear and potential strain of knee’s soft-tissues. Females exhibited a sex dimorphism in lower limb biomechanics that may further elevate their injury risk. Both limbs exhibited biomechanics that may increase injury risk, but only the non-dominant limb further increased injury risk with load.

Females and males use different hip and knee mechanics in response to symmetric military-relevant loads

The purpose of this study was to determine if females and males use different hip and knee mechanics when walking with standardized military-relevant symmetric loads. Fifteen females and fifteen males walked on a treadmill for 2-min at a constant speed under three symmetric load conditions (unloaded: 1.71 kg, medium: 15 kg, heavy: 26 kg). Kinematic and kinetics of the hip and knee were calculated in the sagittal and frontal planes of the dominant limb. In females, hip abduction moments (normalized to total mass) and sagittal knee excursion decreased with increased load (p ≤ 0.024). In males, hip frontal excursion and adduction angle increased with load (p ≤ 0.003). Females had greater peak hip adduction angle than males in the unloaded and medium load conditions (p ≤ 0.036). Across sex, sagittal hip and knee excursion, peak knee extension angle, and peak hip and knee flexion angles increased with increased load (p ≤ 0.005). When normalized to body mass, all peak joint moments increased with each load (p ≤ 0.016) except peak hip adduction moment. When normalized to total mass, peak hip adduction moment and knee flexion, extension, and adduction moments decreased with each load (p < 0.001). While hip frontal plane kinetic alterations to load were only noted in females, kinematic changes were noted in males at the hip and females at the knee. Differences in strategies may increase the risk of hip and knee injuries in females compared to males. This study noted load and sex effects that were previously undetected, highlighting the importance of using military-relevant standardized loads and investigating frontal plane adaptations.

Effect of contralateral cane use on hip moment impulse in the frontal plane during the stance phase

BackgroundRecent reports have shown that the daily cumulative moment in the frontal plane (i.e., product of hip moment impulse in the frontal plane during the stance phase and mean steps per day) is a risk factor for hip osteoarthritis. This study aimed to clarify the effect of contralateral cane use on hip moment impulse in the frontal plane of the stance limb. MethodsThis study included 15 healthy subjects who walked under four experimental conditions: (1) without a cane and (2–4) contralateral cane use with 10%, 15%, and 20% body weight support (BWS), respectively. To maintain the same walking speed in all conditions, the cadence was set to 80 steps/min, and the step length was fixed. The hip moment impulses in the frontal plane (i.e., area under the hip ab-adduction moment waveform) and peak hip adduction moments in all conditions were calculated. ResultsContralateral cane use significantly decreased the hip moment impulse in the frontal plane and peak hip adduction moment compared to non-cane use. Moreover, the hip moment impulse in the frontal plane and peak hip adduction moment decreased significantly with increased cane BWS. There were no significant differences in walking speed, cadence, and step length between the four conditions. ConclusionContralateral cane use decreases the hip moment impulse in the frontal plane and peak hip adduction moment in the stance limb. These findings may help clarify how to delay the progression of hip osteoarthritis.

Sub-elite Football Players With Hip-Related Groin Pain and a Positive Flexion, Adduction, and Internal Rotation Test Exhibit Distinct Biomechanical Differences Compared With the Asymptomatic Side.

Background Hip-related groin pain is common in sub-elite football players and may be associated with altered hip biomechanics. Objectives To compare the hip biomechanics, bony hip morphology associated with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) syndrome, and hip strength and range of motion (ROM) between the symptomatic and asymptomatic limbs of sub-elite football players with unilateral hip-related groin pain and a positive flexion, adduction, and internal rotation (FADIR) test. Methods Fifteen sub-elite football (soccer) players with unilateral hip-related groin pain and a positive FADIR test were recruited for this observational cross-sectional study. Three-dimensional motion analysis and ground reaction force data were recorded for walking and a single-leg drop-jump (SLDJ) task. Participants also underwent a standard anterior-posterior hip radiograph and hip strength and ROM assessment. Between-limb differences were assessed using paired t tests or Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Results The symptomatic limb displayed a smaller peak hip extension angle (P = .01) and a lower peak hip adduction moment (P = .03) compared with the asymptomatic limb during the stance phase of walking. Additionally, during the SLDJ, the symptomatic limb demonstrated less total sagittal plane ROM (P = .04). The symptomatic limb also demonstrated less external rotation ROM (P = .03). However, no differences were found between limbs for bony hip morphology associated with FAI syndrome or hip strength. Conclusion This study found between-limb asymmetries in low- and high-impact functional tasks, such as walking and an SLDJ, in football players with unilateral hip-related groin pain. Despite unilateral pain, bony morphology associated with FAI syndrome did not differ between limbs. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2018;48(7):584-593. Epub 8 May 2018. doi:10.2519/jospt.2018.7910.

An Analysis of Squat Mechanics Between Individuals With High and Low Strength Levels

Individuals with weak hip musculature may have compensatory hip and knee motion during common strengthening exercises, such as the back squat (BS), that elevate frontal plane joint loading. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare frontal plane squat mechanic.0s between strong and weak individuals during the BS. METHODS: Twenty-eight individuals (17 males and 11 females, 23.42±3.34 yrs., 1.72±0.09 m, 73.20±11.41 kg) who consistently performed the BS were recruited for this study, and were categorized into strong (n=14, 23.00±0.08yrs, 1.69±0.09m, 71.97±11.80kg) and weak (n=14, 23.86±3.86yrs, 1.76±0.08m, 74.43±11.32kg) groups using a median split of BS 1-repetition- maximum (1RM) normalized to body mass. This study required two visits, with the first being 1RM testing and the second consisting of a 3-dimensional assessment of squatting mechanics. During the second visit, participants performed 2 sets of 3 repetitions of the BS at 70% and 85% 1RM in a random order. The average of the second repetitions of each set was used for analysis. Dependent variables included the peak knee abduction angle and external moment, and peak hip adduction angle and external moment. 2 (group) x 2 (load) mixed model ANOVA was used to compare peak external knee abduction moments and angles, and peak external hip adduction moments and angles at 70% and 85% 1RM. RESULTS: Group x load interactions were not significant for peak knee abduction angles (F1,26=1.05, p=0.31) and moments (F1,26=0.61, p=0.44), or for peak hip adduction angles (F1,26=0.87, p=0.61) and moments (F1,26=0.11, p=0.79). There were also no main effects of load or group on any dependent variable. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that strong and weak individuals have similar frontal plane hip and knee mechanics during the BS at 70% and 85% 1RM. However, these loads were relatively similar, and loads greater than 85% 1RM are frequently used in exercise programs. Differences may also become evident during repetitions closer to failure. Future research should examine if compensatory frontal plane actions are found with greater resistance. Furthermore, all participants were trained regardless of group, and training status may influence the magnitude of frontal plane hip and knee motion during the BS.

Frontal plane hip joint loading according to pain severity in people with hip osteoarthritis.

The primary objective was to examine the hip adduction moment during walking in people with hip osteoarthritis (OA) according to pain severity. Sixty-eight participants with unilateral symptomatic hip OA were included. Pain during walking was assessed on a 5-point Likert item within the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Index (no pain = 12; mild pain n = 37; moderate pain n = 19). Measures of the external hip adduction moment (peaks, Nm/BW × BH (%) and impulse, Nm.s/BW × BH (%)) were determined. Other measures included frontal plane hip, pelvis and trunk kinematics, walking speed and peak isometric hip abductor strength. Variables were compared according to pain severity using linear models and biomechanical variables were examined. Participants with moderate pain had a significantly higher second peak hip adduction moment and impulse compared to those with less pain. There was no difference in any measure of hip adduction moment between those with mild pain and no pain. There were no differences in kinematics across pain severity categories. Participants with moderate pain had a significantly slower walking speed compared to participants with mild and no pain. Participants with moderate pain had weaker peak isometric hip abductor strength compared to those with mild pain and no pain. The hip adduction moment during walking, hip abduction strength and walking speed differs according to pain severity during walking in people with hip OA. © 2017 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 36:1637-1644, 2018.

Study of the interactions between proximal femur 3d bone shape, cartilage health, and biomechanics in patients with hip Osteoarthritis.

In this study quantitative MRI and gait analysis were used to investigate the relationships between proximal femur 3D bone shape, cartilage morphology, cartilage biochemical composition, and joint biomechanics in subject with hip Osteoarthritis (OA). Eighty subjects underwent unilateral hip MR-imaging: T1ρ and T2 relaxation times were extracted through voxel based relaxometry and bone shape was assessed with 3D MRI-based statistical shape modeling. In addition, 3D gait analysis was performed in seventy-six of the studied subjects. Associations between shape, cartilage lesion presence, severity, and cartilage T1ρ and T2 were analyzed with linear regression and statistical parametric mapping. An ad hoc analysis was performed to investigate biomechanics and shape associations. Our results showed that subjects with a higher neck shaft angle in the coronal plane (higher mode 1, coxa valga), thicker femoral neck and a less spherical femoral head (higher mode 5, pistol grip) exhibited more severe acetabular and femoral cartilage abnormalities, showing different interactions with demographics factors. Subjects with coxa valga also demonstrated a prolongation of T1ρ and T2. Subjects with pistol grip deformity exhibited reduced hip internal rotation angles and subjects with coxa valga exhibited higher peak hip adduction moment and moment impulse. The results of this study establish a clear relationship between 3D proximal femur shape variations and markers of hip joint degeneration-morphological, compositional, well as insight on the possible interactions with demographics and biomechanics, suggesting that 3D MRI-based bone shape maybe a promising biomarker of early hip joint degeneration. © 2017 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 36:330-341, 2018.

Sex-specific hip osteoarthritis-associated gait abnormalities: Alterations in dynamic hip abductor function differ in men and women

BackgroundHip osteoarthritis results in abnormal gait mechanics, but it is not known whether abnormalities are the same in men and women. The hypothesis tested was that gait abnormalities are different in men and women with hip osteoarthritis vs. sex-specific asymptomatic groups. Methods150 subjects with mild through severe radiographic hip osteoarthritis and 159 asymptomatic subjects were identified from an Institutional Review Board-approved motion analysis data repository. Sagittal plane hip range of motion and peak external moments about the hip, in all three planes, averaged from normal speed walking trials, were compared for men and women, with and without hip osteoarthritis using analysis of variance. FindingsThere were significant sex by group interactions for the external peak hip adduction and external rotation moments (P=0.009–0.045). Although asymptomatic women had peak adduction and external rotation moments that were respectively 12% higher and 23% lower than asymptomatic men (P=0.026–0.037), these variables did not differ between men and women with hip osteoarthritis (P≥0.684). The osteoarthritis vs. asymptomatic group difference in the peak hip adduction moment was 45% larger in women than in men. The osteoarthritis vs. asymptomatic group difference in the peak hip external rotation moment was 55% larger for men than for women (P<0.001). Sex did not influence the association between radiographic severity and gait variables. InterpretationNormal sex differences in gait were not seen in hip osteoarthritis. Sex-specific adaptations may reflect different aspects of hip abductor function. Men and women with hip osteoarthritis may require different interventions to improve function.

Predicting knee osteoarthritis risk in injured populations

BackgroundIndividuals who suffered a lower limb injury have an increased risk of developing knee osteoarthritis. Early diagnosis of osteoarthritis and the ability to track its progression is challenging. This study aimed to explore links between self-reported knee osteoarthritis outcome scores and biomechanical gait parameters, whether self-reported outcome scores could predict gait abnormalities characteristic of knee osteoarthritis in injured populations and, whether scores and biomechanical outcomes were related to osteoarthritis severity via Spearman's correlation coefficient. MethodsA cross-sectional study was conducted with asymptomatic participants, participants with lower-limb injury and those with medial knee osteoarthritis. Spearman rank determined relationships between knee injury and outcome scores and hip and knee kinetic/kinematic gait parameters. K-Nearest Neighbour algorithm was used to determine which of the evaluated parameters created the strongest classifier model. FindingsDifferences in outcome scores were evident between groups, with knee quality of life correlated to first and second peak external knee adduction moment (0.47, 0.55). Combining hip and knee kinetics with quality of life outcome produced the strongest classifier (1.00) with the least prediction error (0.02), enabling classification of injured subjects gait as characteristic of either asymptomatic or knee osteoarthritis subjects. When correlating outcome scores and biomechanical outcomes with osteoarthritis severity only maximum external hip and knee abduction moment (0.62, 0.62) in addition to first peak hip adduction moment (0.47) displayed significant correlations. InterpretationThe use of predictive models could enable clinicians to identify individuals at risk of knee osteoarthritis and be a cost-effective method for osteoarthritis screening.

Hip biomechanics during stair ascent and descent in people with and without hip osteoarthritis.

Hip osteoarthritis (OA) is often associated with pain and impaired function. Understanding biomechanical alterations in patients with hip OA during challenging activities such as stair use is important to inform treatments. The aim of this study was to determine whether kinematics and kinetics during stair ambulation differed between people with hip OA and healthy controls. Fifteen participants with symptomatic and radiographic hip OA and 15 asymptomatic healthy controls underwent 3-D motion analysis during stair ascent and descent. Trunk, pelvis, and hip kinematics as well as hip kinetics were evaluated. Analyses were performed unadjusted and adjusted for speed and leg length. In both the unadjusted and adjusted analyses, participants with hip OA ascended stairs with less hip range of motion in all three planes and a lower peak external rotation moment compared to controls. In the unadjusted analysis, hip OA participants descended stairs with greater ipsilateral trunk lean, less sagittal plane range of motion, lower peak extension moment, lower peak external rotation moment, and greater hip adduction moment impulse compared to controls. In the adjusted results, peak internal rotation moment and hip adduction moment impulse were greater in hip OA participants compared to controls. Findings show that individuals with hip OA display limited range of hip joint movement, particularly during stair ascent, and overall indicate the use of strategies (e.g., trunk lean; lower peak external rotation moment; higher adduction moment impulse) that implicate altered hip abductor function. Future research is required to further understand the implications of these findings on hip OA. © 2017 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 35:1505-1514, 2017.

Uphill walking: Biomechanical demand on the lower extremities of obese adolescents

The number of obesity prevalence in adolescents is still increasing. Obesity treatment programs typically include physical activity with walking being recommended as appropriate activity, but limited information exists on the demand uphill walking places on the joint loading and power of obese adolescents. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of different inclinations on step characteristics, sagittal and frontal joint angles, joint moments and joint power of obese adolescents in comparison to their normal-weight peers. Eleven obese (14.5±1.41 years, BMI: 31.1±3.5kg/m2) and eleven normal-weight adolescents (14.3±1.86 years, BMI: 19.0±1.7kg/m2) walked with 1.11m/s on a ramp with two imbedded force plates (AMTI, 1000Hz) at three inclinations (level, 6°, 12°). Kinematic data were collected via an infrared-camera motion system (Vicon, 250Hz). The two-way (inclination, group) ANOVA indicated a significant effect of inclination on almost all variables analysed, with the hip joint being the most affected by inclination, followed by the knee and ankle joint. The obese participants additionally spent less time in swing phase, walked with an increased knee flexion and valgus angle and an increased peak hip flexion and adduction moment. Hip joint power of obese adolescents was especially in the steepest inclination significantly increased compared to their normal-weight peers. Obese adolescents demonstrate increased joint loading compared to their normal-weight peers and in combination with a musculoskeletal malalignment they might be prone to an increased overuse injury risk.

Immediate Effects of a Brace on Gait Biomechanics for Predominant Lateral Knee Osteoarthritis and Valgus Malalignment After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Background: Lateral knee osteoarthritis is notably common after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). While valgus bracing has been investigated as an intervention for medial knee osteoarthritis (OA), little is known about the effectiveness of varus bracing for lateral knee OA after ACLR. Purpose: To determine the immediate effects of a varus unloader knee brace on gait biomechanics in people with lateral knee OA and valgus malalignment after ACLR. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Nineteen participants who had undergone primary ACLR 5 to 20 years previously and had symptomatic and radiographic lateral knee OA as well as valgus malalignment were included. Three-dimensional gait analyses were conducted during walking under 3 test conditions: (1) no brace, (2) unadjusted brace (sagittal plane support with neutral frontal plane adjustment), and (3) adjusted brace (sagittal plane support with varus adjustment). Knee, pelvis, hip, and ankle kinematics and moments data were statistically analyzed using repeated-measures analysis of variance (α = 0.05). Results: Compared with walking with no brace, the adjusted brace significantly increased peak knee flexion angle (mean difference [95% CI]: 3.2° [1.3° to 5.0°]) and adduction angle (1.7° [0.8° to 2.6°]) and reduced peak internal rotation angle (−3.0° [−4.0° to −2.0°]). Significant increases in peak knee flexion moment (0.14 N·m/kg [0.06 to 0.20 N·m/kg]), adduction moment (0.10 N·m/kg [0.07 to 0.14 N·m/kg]), and external rotation moment (0.01 N·m/kg [0.00 to 0.02 N·m/kg]) were observed with the adjusted brace. The adjusted brace also reduced peak hip adduction angle (−1.29° [−2.12 to −0.47]) and increased peak hip adduction (0.17 N·m/kg [0.04 to 0.31 N·m/kg]) and external rotation moments (0.09 N·m/kg [0.03 to 0.14 N·m/kg]). There were no significant differences between the adjusted and unadjusted brace conditions, except for knee internal rotation angle, where the adjusted brace produced significantly greater reductions relative to the unadjusted brace (−1.46° [−1.98 to −0.95]). Conclusion: Irrespective of frontal plane adjustment, the varus unloader brace produced immediate modulations in sagittal, frontal, and transverse plane joint angles and moments in younger individuals with lateral knee OA and valgus malalignment after ACLR. Clinical Relevance: The varus unloader brace may have the potential to mitigate abnormal knee joint mechanics associated with the development and progression of lateral knee OA after ACLR.

Kinematics and kinetics during walking in individuals with gluteal tendinopathy

BackgroundLateral hip pain during walking is a feature of gluteal tendinopathy but little is known how walking biomechanics differ in individuals with gluteal tendinopathy. This study aimed to compare walking kinematics and kinetics between individuals with and without gluteal tendinopathy. MethodsThree-dimensional walking-gait analysis was conducted on 40 individuals aged 35 to 70years with unilateral gluteal tendinopathy and 40 pain-free controls. An analysis of covariance was used to compare kinematic and kinetic variables between groups. Linear regression was performed to investigate the relationship between kinematics and external hip adduction moment in the gluteal tendinopathy group. FindingsIndividuals with gluteal tendinopathy demonstrated a greater hip adduction moment throughout stance than controls (standardized mean difference ranging from 0.60 (first peak moment) to 0.90 (second peak moment)). Contralateral trunk lean at the time of the first peak hip adduction moment was 1.2 degrees greater (P=0.04), and pelvic drop at the second peak hip adduction moment 1.4 degrees greater (P=0.04), in individuals with gluteal tendinopathy. Two opposite trunk and pelvic strategies were also identified within the gluteal tendinopathy group. Contralateral pelvic drop was significantly correlated with the first (R=0.35) and second peak (R=0.57) hip adduction moment, and hip adduction angle with the second peak hip adduction moment (R=−0.36) in those with gluteal tendinopathy. InterpretationIndividuals with gluteal tendinopathy exhibit greater hip adduction moments and alterations in trunk and pelvic kinematics during walking. Findings provide a basis to consider frontal plane pelvic control in the management of gluteal tendinopathy.

2C12 股関節内転モーメントのピーク値を減少させる歩行修正に関する研究

2C12 股関節内転モーメントのピーク値を減少させる歩行修正に関する研究

Identifying clinically meaningful benchmarks for gait improvement after total hip arthroplasty.

There are no established benchmarks for gait mechanics after total hip arthroplasty (THA). This study sought to identify minimum clinically important postoperative (MCIP) or minimum clinically important improvement (MCII) values for self-selected walking speed, sagittal plane dynamic hip range of motion (HROM) (peak flexion-peak extension) and peak hip adduction moments measured during quantitative gait analysis. Preoperative and 1-year postoperative data collected during quantitative gait analysis, along with Harris Hip Scores (HHS), for 145 subjects were collected from a motion analysis data repository. The MCIP (or MCII) was defined as the 75th percentile mark on a plot of the cumulative percent of subjects with HHS ≥ 80 versus the postoperative value (or change) in the respective variable. 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Logistic regression was used to test the association of age, sex, BMI, and preoperative HHS with benchmarks. The MCIP of speed was 1.34 m/s (95%CI 1.30, 1.37); MCII was 0.32 (0.30, 0.35) m/s. The HROM MCIP was 30.0° (29.4°, 30.7°); MCII was 13.3° (12.1°, 14.8°). The adduction moment MCIP was 4.2% Body Weight × Height (4.0, 4.4); MCII was 0.87 (0.57, 1.17) % Body Weight × Height. Women were more likely to achieve MCII for HROM and MCIP for adduction moment (ORs 2.4-11.6, p ≤ 0.031). Lower BMI predicted HROM and adduction moment MCIPs (ORs 0.85-0.88, p ≤ 0.015). Lower preoperative HHS predicted speed, HROM and adduction moment MCIIs (ORs 0.95-0.97, p ≤ 0.012). With further validation, clinically-relevant gait benchmarks can enhance efforts to improve THA outcomes.