Peak Elbow Research Articles

Limiting Access to Resistance Training Equipment During the Off-Season: The Impact on Collegiate Pitching Metrics.

Gdovin, JR, Hogan, B, and Williams, CC. Limiting access to resistance training equipment during the off-season: the impact on collegiate pitching metrics. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2024-Resistance training has been shown to improve overhead throwing velocity, but it is unknown as to how limiting access to a strength and conditioning facility affects a baseball pitcher's readiness for the spring season. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine the influence of an individualized pitching program on pitching metrics during an 8-week fall season in collegiate baseball pitchers without a simultaneous structured strength training program. Twelve National Collegiate Athletic Association Division-I baseball pitchers completed the study and wore a PULSE Throw Workload Monitor to track peak arm slot angle, peak arm velocity, and peak elbow varus torque, while a radar gun measured ball velocity. An 8-week pitching program had subjects throw 30 and 50 maximum effort pitches in the first and eighth week, respectively, while workload increased by 5 maximum effort pitches every 2 weeks. Paired samples t-tests were conducted to compare variables of interest before and after an 8-week fall season with an alpha level set at 0.05. There was no significant difference in peak arm slot angle, peak arm velocity, and peak elbow varus torque (p > 0.05); however, there was a significant decrease in ball velocity (p < 0.001). These data indicate that 8-week pitching programs, not coupled with a resistance training regimen, negatively affect a pitcher's ball velocity. Sport coaches and practitioners should thus make accommodations to access the necessary equipment for a pitching and strength training program to be implemented simultaneously to ensure that pitchers are prepared to perform at an optimal level during the spring season.

Predicting the Presence of Pain in Youth Baseball Pitchers Using the Concept of Biomechanical Efficiency.

Increases in peak shoulder distraction force and peak elbow valgus torque may influence throwing-arm pain and injury risk in youth pitchers. The purpose of this study was to determine whether shoulder distraction force and elbow valgus torque while accounting for anthropometrics and pitch velocity can predict the presence of pain in youth baseball pitchers. It was hypothesized that throwing-arm pain could be predicted using the concept of biomechanical efficiency, where a pitcher who is less efficient (having higher force or torque with the same pitch velocity) is more likely to experience pain. Descriptive laboratory study. A total of 38 youth baseball pitchers (mean age, 13.3 ± 1.7 years) were divided into a pain group and pain-free group based on presence of throwing-arm pain as reported on a health history questionnaire. Each pitcher threw 3 maximal-effort fastballs to a catcher at regulation distance, and kinematics were measured using an electromagnetic motion-capture system (minimum 100 Hz). Height and weight as well as mean peak shoulder distraction force, peak elbow valgus torque, and pitch velocity across the 3 trials were evaluated. Logistic regression analyses determined whether shoulder distraction force or elbow valgus torque could predict the presence of throwing-arm pain when holding anthropometrics (body weight for shoulder distraction force; body weight and height for elbow valgus torque) and pitch velocity constant. Shoulder distraction force significantly predicted the presence of throwing-arm pain after accounting for body weight and pitch velocity (χ2 = 9.49; P = .023). Specifically, for every 1-N increase in peak shoulder distraction force while holding body weight and pitch velocity constant, there was a 0.6% increased likelihood of experiencing throwing-arm pain. Elbow valgus torque could not predict the presence of pain when holding body weight, height, and pitch velocity constant. The models demonstrated that increases in peak shoulder distraction forces when holding pitch velocity and body weight constant increased a youth baseball pitcher's likelihood of experiencing throwing-arm pain. The study results support the concept of the biomechanical efficiency framework by offering evidence that maintaining pitch velocity with a lower joint load led to a lower likelihood of pain. Results suggest that practicing efficient movement strategies can decrease the likelihood of experiencing throwing-arm pain while maintaining performance.

Upper extremity effort during the sit-to-stand task in able-bodied and in individuals with spinal cord injury: A preliminary study

Objective To investigate the association between the presence of spinal cord injury (SCI) on biomechanical variables by comparing individuals with SCI and able-bodied individuals during the sit-to-stand (STS) task assisted by a walker device. Specifically, we compared the upper-extremity joint angles and moments, trunk forward tilt angle, vertical forces of the instrumented walker, and ground reaction forces between groups. Design Case–control study. Setting Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, UNICAMP-Brazil. Participants Six individuals with SCI and fourteen able-bodied individuals. Main outcome measures Kinematics and kinetics of the shoulder, elbow, and wrist joints; trunk forward tilt angle, vertical walker forces, and ground reaction forces (GRF) were analyzed during the STS task in two phases: before and after the seat-off event. Results A higher peak elbow flexion angle and higher vertical walker forces were observed before the seat-off, whereas the lower peak vertical GRF was found, after the seat-off, in the SCI group compared with the control group. Conclusions SCI affects kinematics and kinetics variables during the STS task compared to able-bodied controls. Individuals with SCI adopted different standing-up strategies that affected the distribution of the forces in the upper and lower extremities of the human body.

Elbow joint loads during simulated activities of daily living: implications for formulating recommendations after total elbow arthroplasty

Overloading of the elbow joint prosthesis following total elbow arthroplasty can lead to implant failure. Joint moments during daily activities are not well-contextualized for a prosthesis' failure limits and the effect of the current postoperative instruction on elbow joint loading is unclear. This study investigates the difference in elbow joint moments between simulated daily tasks and between flexion-extension, pronation-supination, varus-valgus movement directions. Additionally, the effect of the current postoperative instruction on elbow joint load is examined. Nine healthy participants (age 45.8 ± 17 years, 3 males) performed eight tasks; driving a car, opening a door, rising from chair, lifting, sliding, combing hair, drinking, emptying cup, without and with the instruction "not lifting more than 1 kg". Upper limb kinematics and hand contact forces were measured. Elbow joint angles and net moments were analyzed using inverse dynamic analysis, where the net moments are estimated from movement data and external forces. Peak elbow joint moments differed significantly between tasks (p < 0.01) and movement directions (p < 0.01). The most and least demanding tasks were, rising from a chair (13.4 Nm extension, 5.0 Nm supination, 15.2 Nm valgus) and sliding (4.3 Nm flexion, 1.7 Nm supination, 2.6 Nm varus). Net moments were significantly reduced after instruction only in the chair task (p < 0.01). This study analyzed elbow joint moments in different directions during daily tasks. The outcomes question whether postoperative instruction can lead to decreasing elbow loads. Future research might focus on reducing elbow loads in the flexion-extension and varus-valgus directions.

Optimal Distal Tendon Insertion Point for Elbow Flexion in Free-Functioning Gracilis Muscle Transfer for Panbrachial Plexus Injuries: A Cadaveric Study

Following pan-brachial plexus injuries, restoration of elbow flexion is widely accepted as the reconstructive priority. A gracilis free functioning muscle transfer (FFMT) can be used to restore elbow flexion alone with insertion into the biceps brachii (BIC) or brachioradialis (BRD) tendons or restore combined elbow and finger flexion with a more distal insertion into the flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) tendons. Using cadaveric experiments, we determined the peak instantaneous moment arm for each insertion option. Six simulated gracilis transfer surgeries were performed using both arms of three fresh-frozen full body cadaveric specimens (age: 79 + 10 years. 2 female). The gracilis muscles from both legs were harvested and transferred to the contralateral upper extremity. The elbow was manually moved through three flexion-extension cycles while the instantaneous moment arm was calculated from measurements of gracilis excursion and elbow joint angle for the three distal insertion sites. Peak instantaneous moment arm for all three insertions occurred at an elbow angle between 83° to 92° with a magnitude ranging from 33 mm to 54 mm. The more distal (FDP/BRD) insertions produced a significantly greater (∼1.5 times) peak elbow flexion instantaneous moment arm compared to the BIC insertion. Based on the instantaneous moment arm, the gracilis FFMT distal insertion locations could result in greater reconstructed elbow flexion strength. In addition, direct measurement of the shape and magnitude of the moment arm curve for differing insertion sites allows high resolution surgical planning and model testing. This study presents the first direct experimental quantification of the gracilis FFMT instantaneous moment arm. The experimental evidence supports the use of FDP/BRD insertion locations by providing a quantitative explanation for the increased elbow flexion torque observed clinically in patients with a gracilis FFMT and distal FDP insertion.

Effects of Contralateral Trunk Tilt on Shoulder and Elbow Injury Risk and Pitching Biomechanics in Professional Baseball Pitchers

Background: Baseball pitchers employ various contralateral trunk tilt (CTT) positions when pitching depending on if they have an overhand, three-quarter, or sidearm delivery. There are no known studies that have examined how pitching biomechanics are significantly different in professional pitchers with varying amounts of CTT, which may provide insight into shoulder and elbow injury risk among pitchers with different CTT. Purpose: To assess differences in shoulder and elbow forces and torques and baseball pitching biomechanics in professional pitchers with maximum 30° to 40° CTT (MaxCTT), moderate 15° to 25° CTT (ModCTT), and minimum 0° to 10° CTT (MinCTT). Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: In total, 215 pitchers were examined, including 46 pitchers with MaxCTT, 126 pitchers with ModCTT, and 43 pitchers with MinCTT. All pitchers were tested using a 240-Hz, 10-camera motion analysis system, and 37 kinematic and kinetic parameters were calculated. Differences in kinematic and kinetic variables among the 3 CTT groups were assessed with a 1-way analysis of variance (P < .01). Results: Maximum shoulder anterior force and maximum elbow proximal force were significantly greater in ModCTT (403 ± 79 N) than MaxCTT (369 ± 75 N) and MinCTT (364 ± 70 N), while maximum elbow flexion torque and shoulder proximal force, respectively, were significantly greater in ModCTT (69 ± 11 N·m and 1176 ± 152 N, respectively) than MaxCTT (62 ± 12 N·m and 1085 ± 119 N, respectively). During arm cocking, maximum pelvis angular velocity was greater in MinCTT than MaxCTT and ModCTT, and maximum upper trunk angular velocity was greater in MaxCTT and ModCTT than MinCTT. At ball release, trunk forward tilt was greater in MaxCTT and ModCTT than MinCTT and greater in MaxCTT than ModCTT, while arm slot angle was less in MaxCTT and ModCTT than MinCTT and less in MaxCTT than ModCTT. Conclusion: The greatest shoulder and elbow peak forces occurred in ModCTT, which occurs in pitchers who throw with a three-quarter arm slot. More research is needed to assess if pitchers with ModCTT are at a higher risk of shoulder and elbow injury compared with pitchers with MaxCTT (overhand arm slot) and MinCTT (sidearm arm slot), although in the pitching literature, excessive elbow and shoulder forces and torques have been shown to correlate with elbow and shoulder injuries. Clinical Relevance: The results from the current study will help clinicians better understand if differences in kinematic and kinetic measures differ with pitching, or if differences in force, torque, and arm position occur at different arm slots.

A biomechanical analysis of dumbbell curl and investigation of the effects of increasing loads on biceps brachii using a finite element model

Dumbbell curl is one of the most important strengthening exercises for the upper extremity. This exercise trains especially biceps brachii. Exercise load is increased to achieve more muscle strength for the biceps brachii. Researchers are usually focused on electromyography (EMG) in order to examine the effects of load increasing on muscle contraction. However, only the muscle force can be predicted with EMG measurement. Structural analysis of the muscles cannot be performed. In this study, the effects of load increasing on biceps brachii were investigated by mechanical analysis. The inverse dynamic model was simulated according to the motion analysis of dumbbell curl exercises performed with 6 kg and 10.7 kg. The muscle force of the biceps brachii was calculated from the elbow joint reaction moment. A simplified finite element model of biceps brachii was created and stress-strain response was examined. Although the muscle force increases by 78.3%, the rate of increase of elbow peak moment is 57.7% and the rate of increase of peak muscle force is 38.3%. Similarly, the rate of increase of maximum strain and maximum stress are 44.4% and 37.3%, respectively. According to these results, it is understood that increasing the dumbbell load does not increase the muscle force at the same rate.

Trail Leg Hip Power: Influence On Elbow Varus Torque In Baseball Pitchers

Although excessive elbow varus torque has been reported to contribute to ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) injury in baseball pitchers, contributing factors remain relatively unknown. The lower extremities generate power that is transferred up through the kinetic chain in pitching. Specifically, the trailing hip generates triplanar power during the stride phase. Diminished trailing hip power generation during pitching may necessitate compensatory power generation at the trunk and shoulder, potentially impacting elbow torque. PURPOSE: To determine the relationship between hip power and elbow varus torque during pitching. METHODS: Participants (n = 48) were high-school and collegiate baseball pitchers (17.6 ± 2.5 yrs, 1.85 ± 0.06 m, 84.7 ± 13.4 kg). Reflective markers were placed on the bilateral lower extremities (femoral condyles, malleoli, calcaneus, and distal foot), spine, scapulae and both upper extremities (acromia, humeral epicondyles, styloids of the wrist, and hand). Kinematics and kinetics (instrumented mound) were obtained from the trail limb during 3 maximal effort fastball pitches (36.9 ± 2.5 m/s). Ball velocity (m/s) was measured using an automated ball tracking system. Stride phase was defined as the time between peak stride knee height and stride foot contact. Elbow varus torque and hip power were quantified using inverse dynamics equations and normalized to body weight. Hip power was calculated as the resultant sum of X, Y and Z components expressed in the hip joint coordinate system. Linear regression was used to evaluate the relationship between peak elbow varus torque and hip power, using ball velocity as a covariate. Significance was set to 0.05. RESULTS: Peak hip power was found to be negatively associated with peak elbow varus torque (B = -0.02, p = 0.003, R2 = 11.2%). CONCLUSION: Lower hip power production is associated with higher elbow varus torque during the stride phase of pitching. Greater use of the trail hip during the stride phase may allow pitchers to decrease elbow torque while maintaining ball velocity. Future work should explore intermediate relationships in the pitching kinetic chain to establish a mechanism by which increased hip power may mitigate elbow varus torque in pitching.

Athlete body composition influences movement during sporting tasks: an analysis of softball pitchers’ joint angular velocities

ABSTRACT Softball pitchers are often above-average size and frequently injured; therefore, it is necessary to understand how biomechanics can change according to pitcher body composition. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between joint peak angular velocities and pitch velocity, as well as examine how pitchers’ joint angular velocities differ between high and healthy body-fat percentage (BF%) groups. Forty high-school and college softball pitchers (170.6 ± 6.3 cm, 75.5 ± 16.1 kg, 16 ± 2 years, 34.6 ± 7.4 BF%) completed body composition testing and were placed in one of two groups: 1) high-fat% (≥32%) or 2) healthy-fat% (<32%). Pitchers completed fastball trials. Kinematic data were tracked using an electromagnetic system synced with motion analysis software. Peak and times-series joint angular velocities were tracked over the final 101 frames of the pitch. Pitch velocity was significantly correlated with peak elbow flexion (r = .380, p = .016) and wrist flexion (r = .621, p < .001) angular velocity. A small difference in elbow joint angular velocity was found between body fat percentage groups between ball release and follow-through (SPM(t)1,38 = 3.296, p = .003). Peak joint angular velocities are related to pitch velocity and slight differences in movement patterns exist according to pitcher body fat percentage.

Lead knee flexion angle is associated with both ball velocity and upper extremity joint moments in collegiate baseball pitchers

ABSTRACT An important aspect of the pitching motion is the lead leg knee angle, from initial lead foot contact to ball release, which can influence pitching performance and injury potential. Understanding the implication of this angle is essential to appropriately coach baseball pitchers. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine the lead leg knee flexion influence on both ball velocity and the elbow varus moment. Kinematic and kinetic data were collected using standard optoelectronic motion capture methods from 121 collegiate pitchers and analysed using a random intercept, mixed effects regression model to evaluate the association between the knee angle on peak ball velocity and peak elbow varus moment, independently. Statistically significant associations between the knee flexion angle and ball velocity as well as with the elbow varus moment were noted. The data indicated that a 10° increase in knee flexion at ball was associated with a 2.1 Nm reduction in the peak elbow varus moment (p = 0.021, r2 = 0.12) and a 0.2 m/s reduction in peak ball velocity (p = 0.010, r2 = 0.11). This study provides scientific evidence that the lead knee flexion angle influences both upper extremity stresses and ball velocity.

Increased Elbow and Olecranon Injury History in Professional Pitchers With Increased Elbow Flexion at Ball Release

Background: Elbow flexion at late portions of the pitch has been associated with increased elbow varus torque, a kinetic surrogate associated with injury risk. Direct examinations of injury incidence with elbow flexion angles have not been conducted in professional pitchers. Purpose: To compare elbow and shoulder injury incidence among professional baseball players stratified by degree of elbow flexion at ball release (BR). Study Design: Descriptive laboratory study. Methods: Professional pitchers (N = 314) were instructed to pitch between 8 and 12 fastballs while being evaluated using motion capture technology. Upper extremity injury incidence was recorded upon interview. Pitchers were subsequently subdivided into 3 groups based on increasing elbow flexion at BR. Analysis of variance was used to compare participant characteristics and kinematic and peak kinetic variables. An odds ratio (OR) was calculated to determine the risk of having a previous upper extremity injury based on the degree of elbow flexion at BR. Results: A total of 116 pitchers (132 documented injuries) had a previous upper extremity injury, with elbow injury (76 injuries; 57.6%) being the most common. Evaluation of kinetic values showed that pitchers with the smallest elbow flexion at BR had significantly less peak elbow flexion torque than did those with greatest elbow flexion at BR (3.8 ± 0.5 vs 4.1 ± 0.6 %weight × height; P = .003). Pitchers who demonstrated a greater than average degree of elbow flexion at BR when pitching were more likely to have a history of elbow injury (OR, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.14-3.40; P = .015) and olecranon spur formation or stress fracture (OR, 5.79; 95% CI, 1.25-26.85; P = .025). Conclusion: Pitchers with greater elbow flexion at BR had significantly higher odds of previous injury of the elbow and olecranon. Increasing elbow flexion has been shown to place the medial elbow in a position to carry a greater amount of load, which may be exacerbated during the final moments of the pitching motion. Professional pitchers can consider decreasing elbow flexion at BR as a potential, modifiable risk factor for elbow injury, in particular for olecranon spur formation and fracture. Clinical Relevance: This study attempts to associate injury incidence with a modifiable, kinematic variable for an at-risk population.

Peak Elbow Flexion Does Not Influence Peak Shoulder Distraction Force or Ball Velocity in NCAA Division I Softball Pitchers.

Background:High shoulder distraction force has been observed in softball pitchers during the acceleration phase (top of the pitch to ball release) of a pitch. Increasing elbow flexion may reduce shoulder forces and the susceptibility to pain by shortening the lever arm of the throwing arm.Purpose:To determine the association of peak elbow flexion during the acceleration phase of the pitch with peak shoulder distraction force and ball velocity.Study Design:Descriptive laboratory study.Methods:A total of 61 female collegiate softball pitchers (mean age, 19.9 ± 1.9 years; mean height, 175.7 ± 5.7 cm; mean weight, 83.6 ± 12.7 kg; 49 right-handed) volunteered for this study. Biomechanical data were collected with a 3-dimensional electromagnetic tracking system while the pitchers threw 3 maximal-effort fastballs at a regulation distance. Peak elbow flexion and peak shoulder distraction force were calculated for the acceleration phase and averaged across the 3 trials. Ball velocity was assessed with a radar gun.Results:Simple linear regression analyses indicated that peak elbow flexion did not influence peak shoulder distraction force during the acceleration phase of the pitch (F(1,59) = 2.412; P = .126), with R 2 = 0.023. Additionally, peak elbow flexion during the acceleration phase of the pitch did not influence ball velocity (F(1,59) = 2.435; P = .124), with R 2 = 0.023. A bivariate correlation analysis showed a significant association between ball velocity and shoulder distraction force (R 2 = 0.343; P = .007) in which ball velocity constituted approximately 34% of the variance in shoulder distraction force.Conclusion:Peak elbow flexion did not influence ball velocity or peak shoulder distraction force during the acceleration phase of a windmill softball pitch. However, there was a significant and positive relationship between ball velocity and peak shoulder distraction force. These results may indicate that ball velocity and other kinematic variables may be more related to shoulder distraction force than elbow flexion.Clinical Relevance:Increasing elbow flexion can shorten the lever arm, but it did not reduce shoulder distraction force or increase ball velocity. Therefore, elbow flexion may be more useful as a description of the pitching style rather than a single measure related to increased performance or the risk of injuries. Future research should continue to examine the relationship between other kinematic parameters with shoulder distraction force.

Understanding Bench Press Biomechanics-Training Expertise and Sex Affect Lifting Technique and Net Joint Moments.

Mausehund, L and Krosshaug, T. Understanding bench press biomechanics-Training expertise and sex affect lifting technique and net joint moments. J Strength Cond Res 37(1): 9-17, 2023-The purpose of this study was to compare normalized net joint moments (NJMs), moment arms, and muscle activity in the bench press exercise between powerlifters and recreationally strength-trained lifters and between women and men. Thirty-four healthy adults, including 12 powerlifters (6 women and 6 men) and 22 recreational lifters (9 women and 13 men), performed a 6-8 repetition maximum set of the bench press, while elbow and shoulder NJMs and moment arms and electromyographic (EMG) activity of 6 upper extremity muscles were recorded. The results showed that training expertise and sex affected bench press technique substantially. Powerlifters applied a different bar path which impacted joint kinematics to a greater extent and joint kinetics to a lesser extent. Specifically, powerlifters had lower normalized peak elbow NJMs and shorter joint ROMs than recreational lifters ( p ≤ 0.05), yet no differences in normalized shoulder NJMs and muscle activity were observed. Women showed lower normalized mean shoulder NJMs, higher normalized peak elbow NJMs, and higher mean elbow to shoulder NJM ratios than men ( p ≤ 0.05). The muscle activity of the long head of the triceps brachii and the elbow to shoulder EMG ratio were higher, yet muscle activity of the sternocostal and abdominal head of the pectoralis major was lower for female than for male subjects ( p ≤ 0.05). In conclusion, powerlifters and men are more shoulder dominant when performing the bench press than recreational lifters and women, respectively. These findings will have implications for resistance training program design, expected training adaptations and bench press performance.

Biomechanics Related to Increased Softball Pitcher Shoulder Stress: Implications for Injury Prevention

Background: Softball pitchers exhibit high throwing shoulder distraction force, which is a theorized mechanism of throwing shoulder overuse injury. Windmill pitching involves a variety of highly individualistic pitching styles, and certain kinematics preceding ball release likely influence the amount of shoulder stress that a pitcher accrues. Purpose: To examine the association of trunk and throwing arm kinematics, kinetics, and timing variables with peak throwing shoulder distraction force in high school softball pitchers. Study Design: Descriptive laboratory study. Methods: A total of 37 high school pitchers (mean ± SD; height, 1.71 ± 0.06 m; weight, 75.53 ± 16.12 kg; age, 16 ± 2 years) threw 10 fastball pitches at regulation distance (43 ft [13.1 m]) and with maximum effort. Kinematic data were collected at 240 Hz using an electromagnetic motion capture system synced with motion analysis software. The 3 fastest pitches were averaged and analyzed. Kinematic, kinetic, and timing variables were entered into a stepwise linear regression analysis. Results: Four variables were included in the significant model (F4,39 = 147.51; P < .001) and explained peak shoulder distraction force (R2 = 0.944; adjusted R2 = 0.938; SE = 0.036): increased peak elbow distraction force (t = 19.90; P < .001) and extension moment (t = 3.63; P = .001), as well as decreased elbow flexion velocity (t = −2.37; P = .023) and trunk flexion at foot contact of the pitch (t = −3.00; P = .005). Conclusion: Elbow kinetics and angular velocity, as well as trunk positioning at foot contact, are associated with peak throwing shoulder distraction force in high school softball pitchers. Clinical Relevance: Variables associated with peak throwing shoulder distraction force provide information regarding injury mechanism and coachable cues that might reduce shoulder injury risk among pitchers.

Association of Pitch Timing and Throwing Arm Kinetics in High School and Professional Pitchers

Background: Understanding the relationship between the temporal phases of the baseball pitch and subsequent joint loading may improve our understanding of optimal pitching mechanics and contribute to injury prevention in baseball pitchers. Purpose: To investigate the temporal phases of the pitching motion and their associations with ball velocity and throwing arm kinetics in high school (HS) and professional (PRO) baseball pitchers. Study Design: Descriptive laboratory study. Methods: PRO (n = 317) and HS (n = 54) baseball pitchers were evaluated throwing 8 to 12 fastball pitches using 3-dimensional motion capture (480 Hz). Four distinct phases of the pitching motion were evaluated based on timing of angular velocities: (1) Foot-Pelvis, (2) Pelvis-Torso, (3) Torso-Elbow, and (4) Elbow-Ball. Peak elbow varus torque, shoulder internal rotation torque, and shoulder distraction force were also calculated and compared between playing levels using 2-sample t tests. Linear mixed-effect models with compound symmetry covariance structures were used to correlate pitch velocity and throwing arm kinetics with the distinct temporal phases of the pitching motion. Results: PRO pitchers had greater weight and height, and faster ball velocities than HS pitchers (P < .001). There was no difference in total pitch time between groups (P = .670). PRO pitchers spent less time in the Foot-Pelvis (P = .010) and more time in the Pelvis-Torso (P < .001) phase comparatively. Shorter time spent in the earlier phases of the pitching motion was significantly associated with greater ball velocity for both PRO and HS pitchers (Foot-Pelvis: B = −6.4 and B = −11.06, respectively; Pelvis-Torso: B = −6.4 and B = −11.4, respectively), while also associated with increased shoulder proximal force (Pelvis-Torso: B = −76.4 and B = −77.5, respectively). Decreased time in the Elbow-Ball phase correlated with greater shoulder proximal force for both cohorts (B = −1150 and B = −645, respectively) with no significant correlation found for ball velocity. Conclusion: Significant differences in temporal phases exist between PRO and HS pitchers. For all pitchers, increased time spent in the final phase of the pitching motion has the potential to decrease shoulder distraction force with no significant loss in ball velocity. Clinical Relevance: Identifying risk factors for increased shoulder and elbow kinetics, acting as a surrogate for loading at the respective joints, has potential implications in injury prevention.

The Role of Upper Body Biomechanics in Elite Racewalkers.

The aim of this study was to analyze the link between the upper and lower body during racewalking. Fifteen male and 16 female racewalkers were recorded in a laboratory as they racewalked at speeds equivalent to their 20-km personal records [men: 1:23:12 (±2:45); women: 1:34:18 (±5:15)]; a single representative trial was chosen from each athlete for analysis and averaged data analyzed. Spatial variables (e.g., stride length) were normalized to stature and referred to as ratios. None of the peak upper body joint angles were associated with speed (p < 0.05) and there were no correlations between pelvic motion and speed, but a medium relationship was observed between peak pelvic external rotation (right pelvis rotated backwards) and stride length ratio (r = 0.37). Greater peak shoulder extension was associated with lower stride frequencies (r = −0.47) and longer swing times (r = 0.41), whereas peak elbow flexion had medium associations with flight time (r = −0.44). Latissimus dorsi was the most active muscle at toe-off during peak shoulder flexion; by contrast, pectoralis major increased in activity just before initial contact, concurrent with peak shoulder extension. Consistent but relatively low rectus abdominis and external oblique activation was present throughout the stride, but increased in preparation for initial contact during late swing. The movements of the pelvic girdle were important for optimizing spatiotemporal variables, showing that this exaggerated movement allows for greater stride lengths. Racewalkers should note however that a larger range of shoulder swing movements was found to be associated with lower stride frequency, and smaller elbow angles with increased flight time, which could be indicative of faster walking but can also lead to visible loss of contact. Coaches should remember that racewalking is an endurance event and development of resistance to fatigue might be more important than strength development.

The effect of forearm position on elbow flexion strength in nursing, occupational, and physical therapy students.

Novice nurses, occupational and physical therapist's injury rates are alarming. To test for differences in peak elbow flexion forces (PEFF) by profession using different forearm positions. Entry-level RN, OT, and PT students performed 3-repetitions of standing PEFF in forearm supination, pronation, and neutral. A one-way repeated measures ANOVA determined the forearm position with the greatest PEFF. A one-way ANOVA assessed differences in PEFF between professions. The alpha level was set at p≤0.05 for all analyses. Thirty 30 RN, 25 OT, and 30 PT students (x = 23.27 + /-3.29 yrs.) were studied. A one-way repeated measures ANOVA revealed a significant difference in PEFF between positions (F(2,168) = 144.3, p < 0.0001). A significant (p < 0.0001) pairwise comparison revealed neutral produced the greatest (28.15 + /-12.64 kg) and pronation the least PEFF (17.27 + /-7.40). PEFF was significantly different between position by profession (supination: F(2,82) = 10.14, p < 0.0001; pronation: F(2,82) = 10.33, p < 0.0001; neutral: F(2,82) = 13.39, p < 0.0001). PTs were significantly stronger than OTs and RN students in all forearm positions (p < 0.01). Neutral PEFF was greatest and PT students demonstrated greater PEFF than OT and RN students.

Energy generation, absorption, and transfer at the shoulder and elbow in youth baseball pitchers

ABSTRACT Performance during the baseball pitch is dependent on the flow of mechanical energy through the kinetic chain. Little is known about energy flow during the pitching motion and it is not known whether patterns of energy flow are related to pitching performance and injury risk. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to quantify energy generation, absorption, and transfer across the shoulder and elbow during the baseball pitch and explore the associations between these energetic measures, pitch speed, and traditional measures of upper extremity joint loading. The kinematics of 40 youth baseball pitchers were measured in a controlled laboratory setting. Energy flow between the thorax, humerus, and forearm was calculated using a segmental power analysis. Regression analyses revealed that pitch speed was best predicted by arm cocking phase shoulder energy transfer to the humerus and peak elbow valgus torque was best predicted by arm acceleration-phase elbow energy transfer to the forearm. Additionally, energy transfer across the shoulder and elbow generally exhibited the strongest correlations to pitch speed and upper extremity joint loads. These data reinforce the importance of energy transfer through the kinetic chain for producing high pitch speeds and provide descriptive data for energy flow during baseball pitching not previously found in the literature.

Effect of post-stroke spasticity on voluntary movement of the upper limb

BackgroundHemiparesis following stroke is often accompanied by spasticity. Spasticity is one factor among the multiple components of the upper motor neuron syndrome that contributes to movement impairment. However, the specific contribution of spasticity is difficult to isolate and quantify. We propose a new method of quantification and evaluation of the impact of spasticity on the quality of movement following stroke.MethodsSpasticity was assessed using the Tonic Stretch Reflex Threshold (TSRT). TSRT was analyzed in relation to stochastic models of motion to quantify the deviation of the hemiparetic upper limb motion from the normal motion patterns during a reaching task. Specifically, we assessed the impact of spasticity in the elbow flexors on reaching motion patterns using two distinct measures of the ‘distance’ between pathological and normal movement, (a) the bidirectional Kullback–Liebler divergence (BKLD) and (b) Hellinger’s distance (HD). These measures differ in their sensitivity to different confounding variables. Motor impairment was assessed clinically by the Fugl-Meyer assessment scale for the upper extremity (FMA-UE). Forty-two first-event stroke patients in the subacute phase and 13 healthy controls of similar age participated in the study. Elbow motion was analyzed in the context of repeated reach-to-grasp movements towards four differently located targets. Log-BKLD and HD along with movement time, final elbow extension angle, mean elbow velocity, peak elbow velocity, and the number of velocity peaks of the elbow motion were computed.ResultsUpper limb kinematics in patients with lower FMA-UE scores (greater impairment) showed greater deviation from normality when the distance between impaired and normal elbow motion was analyzed either with the BKLD or HD measures. The severity of spasticity, reflected by the TSRT, was related to the distance between impaired and normal elbow motion analyzed with either distance measure. Mean elbow velocity differed between targets, however HD was not sensitive to target location. This may point at effects of spasticity on motion quality that go beyond effects on velocity.ConclusionsThe two methods for analyzing pathological movement post-stroke provide new options for studying the relationship between spasticity and movement quality under different spatiotemporal constraints.

American Academy of Sports Physical Therapy Platform Presentation Abstracts SPL1–SPL82

American Academy of Sports Physical Therapy Platform Presentation Abstracts SPL1–SPL82