PD-L1 Expression In Breast Cancer Research Articles

LncRNA ZNF649-AS1 promotes trastuzumab resistance and TAM-dependent PD-L1 expression in breast cancer by regulating EXOC7 alternative splicing

BackgroundTrastuzumab resistance is a serious clinical problem in the treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer (BC). The lncRNA ZNF649-AS1 was previously found to promote HER2-positive BC trastuzumab resistance. The study aims to explore the molecular mechanism of ZNF649-AS1 in HER2-positive BC trastuzumab resistance. MethodsTumor tissue and peripheral blood samples were collected from 20 HER2-positive BC patients with trastuzumab-resistant and non-resistant, respectively. Trastuzumab-resistant BC cell lines SKBR-3-TR and BT474-TR were established. RIP was employed to confirm the binding of ZNF649-AS1, PRPF8 and exocyst complex component 7 (EXOC7). RNA expression of EXOC7-L (Full length of EXOC7) and EXOC7-S (Spliceosome of EXOC7) were detected using agarose gel electrophoresis. Expressions of macrophage markers CD68+ CD206+ were measured by flow cytometry. ResultsZNF649-AS1 expression was upregulated in HER2-positive BC trastuzumab resistance. ZNF649-AS1 downregulation inhibited trastuzumab resistance in HER2-positive BC. ZNF649-AS1 regulated EXOC7 alternative splicing by binding with PRPF8. EXOC7-S knockdown suppressed trastuzumab resistance and TAM-dependent PD-L1 expression in HER2-positive BC. EXOC7-S overexpression abolished the effects of ZNF649-AS1 knockdown on trastuzumab resistance and TAM-dependent PD-L1 expression in HER2-positive BC. ConclusionZNF649-AS1 promoted trastuzumab resistance and TAM-dependent PD-L1 expression in HER2-positive BC via promoting alternative splicing of EXOC7 by PRPF8.

Effect of storage time of paraffin sections on the expression of PD-L1 (SP142) in invasive breast cancer

BackgroundPD-L1 staining using long-stored paraffin sections may not be consistent with the true PD-L1 expression of patients. Therefore, it is necessary to explore the expression of PD-L1(SP142) in paraffin sections of invasive breast cancer with different storage times and the optimal storage temperature for unstained paraffin sections.MethodsThe study included 71 cases of PD-L1(SP142) positive breast cancer. The unstained paraffin sections were stored at room temperature conditions (20–25 °C), 4 °C, -20 °C and − 80 °C, respectively. PD-L1 staining was performed at 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12 and 24 weeks of storage. PD-L1 expression was assessed with a continuity score.ResultsThe PD-L1 antigen was gradually lost as the storage time of paraffin sections increased. The PD-L1 positivity rate was 97.18% at 1 week for the sections stored at room temperature, and decreased from 83.10 to 71.83% for the sections stored for 2 weeks to 4 weeks, and 61.97%, 54.93%, and 32.93% for 8, 12, and 24 weeks, respectively. When stored at low temperatures of 4 °C, -20 °C and − 80 °C, the positivity rate decreases with the same trend but more slowly compared to room temperature. The mean IC score of PD-L1 also showed a gradual decrease in all cases. In the consistency analysis, PD-L1 expression in slices stored at room temperature for 2 weeks was consistent with PD-L1 expression in fresh slices (ICC ≥ 0.9 for all slices), and PD-L1 expression in slices stored at 4 °C or -20 °C for 4 weeks was consistent with PD-L1 expression in fresh slices (ICC ≥ 0.9 for all slices). When stored under refrigeration at -80 °C, PD-L1 expression in slices stored for 3 weeks was consistent with that in fresh slices (ICC ≥ 0.9).ConclusionsTo our knowledge, this is the first article on the effect of preservation time and preservation temperature of paraffin sections on PD-L1 expression in breast cancer. Long-term storage of paraffin sections of unstained invasive breast cancer can lead to antigen loss of PD-L1 (SP142). Refrigerated storage of paraffin sections can delay antigen loss, with best results at 4 °C or -20 °C, and a storage time of no more than 4 weeks is recommended.

High dose Vitamin C inhibits PD-L1 by ROS-pSTAT3 signal pathway and enhances T cell function in TNBC

Vitamin C (VitC) presents excellent anti-tumor effect for long time. Recently, high dose VitC achieved by intravenous administration manifests superior anti-tumor effect. However, the functions and detailed mechanisms of high dose VitC’s role in cancer immunity are not fully understood. This study investigates the effect of high dose VitC on PD-L1 expression in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) and the potential mechanism. Results showed VitC inhibited PD-L1 expression in breast cancer cell lines and enhanced anti-tumor effects of T cells. Furthermore, we found VitC inhibited PD-L1 transcription through ROS-pSTAT3 signal pathways. Consistent with in vitro results, in vivo study showed VitC suppressed tumor growth in immunocompetent mice and enhanced CD8+ T cells infiltration and function in tumor microenvironment. Our findings identify the effects of high dose VitC on PD-L1 expression and provide a rationale for the use of high dose VitC as immunomodulator for cancer therapy.

Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes (TILS) and PD-L1 Expression in Breast Cancer: A Review of Current Evidence and Prognostic Implications from Pathologist's Perspective.

With the rise of novel immunotherapies able to stimulate the antitumor immune response, increasing literature concerning the immunogenicity of breast cancer has been published in recent years. Numerous clinical studies have been conducted in order to identify novel biomarkers that could reflect the immunogenicity of BC and predict response to immunotherapy. In this regard, TILs have emerged as an important immunological biomarker related to the antitumor immune response in BC. TILs are more frequently observed in triple-negative breast cancer and HER2+ subtypes, where increased TIL levels have been linked to a better response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and improved survival. PD-L1 is a type 1 transmembrane protein ligand expressed on T lymphocytes, B lymphocytes, and antigen-presenting cells and is considered a key inhibitory checkpoint involved in cancer immune regulation. PD-L1 immunohistochemical expression in breast cancer is observed in about 10-30% of cases and is extremely variable based on tumor stage and molecular subtypes. Briefly, TNBC shows the highest percentage of PD-L1 positivity, followed by HER2+ tumors. On the other hand, PD-L1 is rarely expressed (0-10% of cases) in hormone-receptor-positive BC. The prognostic role of PD-L1 expression in BC is still controversial since different immunohistochemistry (IHC) clones, cut-off points, and scoring systems have been utilized across published studies. In the present paper, an extensive review of the current knowledge of the immune landscape of BC is provided. TILS and PD-L1 expression across different BC subtypes are discussed, providing a guide for their pathological assessment and reporting.

Analysis of PD-L1 Expression in Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis in Asian Population.

This study aimed to investigate the level of PD-L1 protein expression in patients with BCs who were of Asian descent. Three databases were conducted on this article up to August 10th, 2022. The reference lists of the publications were examined for further studies, and in cases of duplicates, a study with a larger sample size was added. In survival analysis, the hazard ratio (HR) was applied to the circumstances characterized by the frequency of occurrences, and for the clinicopathological characteristic, the best-adjusted odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) was employed. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was utilized to evaluate selection criteria, comparison, and exposure to establish the quality of the technique in the under-consideration studies. The Z test determined the association analysis of OS, DFS, and clinicopathological characteristics with PD-L1 expression. All eight trials for OS and six for DFS were considered, with 4.111 and 3.071 participants, respectively. Overexpression of PD-L1 was linked to a reduced OS compared to individuals with undetectable expression (HR= 1.58, 95% CI 1.04-2.40; P=0.03). We analyzed clinicopathological features, and it elevated in individuals with histological grade III (OR=2.39, 95% CI 1.26-4.54; P=0.008) and positive node (OR=0.68, 95% CI 0.48-0.97; P<0.05). Overexpression of PD-L1 was associated with a shorter OS in BCs patients. High PDL1 was higher in persons with nodal positivity and histological grade III.

Subpopulations of B lymphocytes in patients with breast cancer depending on the PD-L1 status

Aim. To study the association between the functional potency and degree of maturity of B lymphocytes and PD-L1 expression in breast cancer patients.Materials and methods. The study included 37 patients with the morphologically verified diagnosis of invasive breast cancer of no special type (IBC NST). The PD-L1 status was determined immunohistochemically using the Ventana SP142 assay (Roche, USA). Using the multiplex flow cytometry-based assay and high-throughput sequencing of the tumor microenvironment, subpopulations of B lymphocytes and their CD27 and PD1 expression profiles were determined, taking into account the PD-L1 status.Results. In the tumor microenvironment, regardless of the PD-L1 status, expression signatures of five lymphocyte subpopulations were determined. However, in PD-L1-positive patients, the levels of B lymphocytes and immunoglobulin class-switched B lymphocytes were higher compared with PD-L1-negative patients. Evaluation of the number of different B lymphocyte subpopulations by flow cytometry showed that PD-1-positive B lymphocytes predominated in the tumor microenvironment in PD-L1-positive patients, regardless of the degree of lymphocyte maturity.Conclusion. The results of the study showed predominance of mature committed B lymphocytes and memory B lymphocytes capable of synthesizing immunoglobulins of different classes and Th2 cytokines involved in type 2 immune response in PD-L-positive tumor microenvironment. It suggests that immunotherapy with PD-L1 inhibitors is highly likely to activate cells with protumor potential and can ultimately contribute to breast cancer progression.

Abstract P2-23-17: Programmed death ligand-1 expression in triple-negative breast cancer from Nigeria

Abstract Introduction: The incidence of triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) in West Africa appears to mirror the higher incidence of the disease among African American women in the United States. However, there remains a paucity of molecular data on TNBC from sub-Saharan Africa, despite the emergence of effective immunotherapies. Methods: Consecutive patients diagnosed with invasive breast cancer between March 2018-Jan 2020 were identified from a prospective clinical database and paired biobank at Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospital (OAUTH). All specimens were processed and fixed in formalin within 60 minutes of excision by a trained pathologist. Tissue sections (4μm thick) representative of tumor were selected for routine evaluation of estrogen, progesterone and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 expression by immunohistochemistry. This was performed at OAUTH with adequate controls according to the ASCO/CAP guidelines and verified at an outside institution for quality assurance. Additional sections from the FFPE blocks of TNBC specimens were further stained using the Dako PharmDx 22C3 PD-L1 commercial assay according to manufacturer protocols at Dalhousie University. External on-slide controls included tonsil, PD-L1 negative TNBC, and PD-L1 positive TNBC. PD-L1 expression was scored using the combined positive score (CPS), which is the number of 22C3 staining tumour cells, lymphocytes, and macrophages divided by the number of viable tumour cells, multiplied by 100. The threshold for a positive result was a CPS of ≥10 as per manufacturer instructions and institutional protocol. Research ethics board approval as well as data and material transfer agreements between institutions was obtained for this study. Results: From 85 cases, 32 were TNBC (37.6%). The mean age and BMI were 49.6±SD 7.7 and 26.2±5.7, respectively. The majority of patients presented with locally advanced disease (64.2% Stage III, 14.2% Stage IV). Seventy-nine percent (78.5%) of patients received an average of five cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (SD 2.3). From 32 TNBC specimens, 27 had available FFPE tissue blocks, and of those, 24 had interpretable PD-L1 IHC for inclusion in the analysis. A total of 37.5% (9/24) of cases demonstrated a CPS ≥10. Conclusions: Over a third of breast cancer specimens in this Nigerian cohort were triple negative, 37.5% of which had PD-L1 CPS scores of ≥10. These results suggest a large proportion of patients in Nigeria may benefit from access to immunotherapy. This is the first reported incidence of PD-L1 expression in breast cancer from sub-Saharan Africa. Citation Format: Olalekan Olasehinde, Funmilola Wuraola, Aleksandra Kajetanowicz, Gilllian Bethune, Marcia Edelweiss, Peter Ntiamoah, Oluwole Odujoko, Avinash Sharma, Victoria Mango, Peter Kingham, Olusegun Alatise, Gregory Knapp. Programmed death ligand-1 expression in triple-negative breast cancer from Nigeria [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-23-17.

Predictive significance of HIF-1α, Snail, and PD-L1 expression in breast cancer.

Currently, the prediction of breast cancer (BC) effectiveness to drug treatment is based on determining the expression level of steroid hormone receptors and human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2). However, significant differences in individual response to drug treatment require the search for new predictive markers. Here, by comprehensively examining HIF-1α, Snail, and PD-L1 expression in BC tumor tissue, we demonstrate that high levels of these markers correlate with unfavorable factors of BC prognosis: the presence of regional and distant metastases and lymphovascular and perineural invasion. Analyzing the predictive significance of markers, we show that the most significant predictors of chemoresistant HER2-negative BC are a high PD-L1 level and a low Snail level, while in HER2-positive BC, only a high PD-L1 level is an independent predictor of chemoresistant BC. Our results suggest that using immune checkpoint inhibitors in these groups of patients may improve drug therapy effectiveness.

A Dual-Mode Imaging Nanoparticle Probe Targeting PD-L1 for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Chemotherapy has remained the mainstay of treatment of triple-negative breast cancer; however, it is significantly limited by the associated side effects. PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibition therapy (ICI) has been a breakthrough for this patient population in recent years. PD-L1 expression is crucial in immunotherapy since it is a major predictor of PD-1/PD-L1 antibody response, emphasizing the significance of monitoring PD-L1 expression. Nonetheless, it is hard to assess the expression of PD-L1 before surgery, which has highlighted the urgency for a precise and noninvasive approach. Herein, we prepared a dual-mode imaging nanoparticle probe to detect PD-L1. The particle size, zeta potential, biocompatibility, and imaging ability of NPs were characterized. The synthesized NPs showed slight cytotoxicity and good T2 relaxivity. The targeted NPs accumulated more in 4T1 cells than nontargeted NPs in vitro. The in vivo experiment further demonstrated the distribution of targeted NPs in tumor tissues, with changes in NIRF and MR signals observed. Our study indicated that SPIO-aPD-L1-Cy5.5 NPs can be used to monitor PD-L1 expression in breast cancer as NIRF/MR contrast agents.

Clinical impact of PD-L1 expression in triple-negative breast cancer patients with residual tumor burden after neoadjuvant chemotherapy

BackgroundStudies on PD-L1 expression in breast cancer have gained importance in recent years, especially in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Our aim was to analyze the differential expression of PD-L1 to explore its correlation with response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and patient survival.MethodsPD-L1 expression was evaluated immunohistochemically (Ventana SP263 clone kit) by staining tumor specimen. PD-L1 positivity was defined as membranous staining > 1%, > 5%, > 10%, and > 20% on either tumor cell (TC) and /or immune cell (IC).ResultsFifty patients with locally advanced TNBC, who had a partial response to NACT, were included in the study. PD-L1 staining was observed in TCs in 25 patients (50%) and in ICs in 23 patients (46%) when PD-L1 > 1% was considered positive. Patients with PD-L1 positivity on ICs were more likely to respond to chemotherapy as measured by “MD Anderson Cancer Center Residual Cancer Burden Index” (14/22, 63.6% vs. 10/27, 37%, p = 0.064). The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) rates were 46.3% and 51.4%, respectively. A high (> 20%) tumoral PD-L1 positivity was associated with a better DFS and DSS.ConclusionsStudies in the literature mostly focused on PD-L1 expression in inflammatory cells. However, our results suggest that patients with a high PD-L1 expression on TCs were more likely to have a better outcome. Since patients with residual tumor burden who express PD-L1 on TILs were more likely to respond to NACT, an immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in addition to NACT would be an important option for TNBC with locally advanced disease.

Mucin-type sialyl-Tn antigen is associated with PD-L1 expression and predicts poor clinical prognosis in breast cancer.

A recent study showed that mucin-type sialylated O-linked glycans could induce the increased expression of PD-L1 via binding to Siglec receptors. However, the relationship between the expression of the mucin-type sialyl-Tn antigen (sTn) and PD-L1 remains unclear in breast cancer (BC). Therefore, we investigate the clinicopathological and prognostic effects of sTn expression and its relationship with PD-L1 expression in BC tissues. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 380 invasive BC patients between January 2011 and January 2014. The last follow-up time was January 31, 2019 with a median follow-up of 62 months. The expression of the sTn antigen and PD-L1 in 380 tumor specimens was assessed by immunohistochemistry. Correlations between sTn/PD-L1 expression and clinicopathological features and prognoses were analyzed. In BC tissues, the positive expression rate of PD-L1 (20.5%) was much lower than that of sTn (41.8%). Pearson's contingency analysis showed that sTn and PD-L1 expression in tumor tissues demonstrated a high correlation (P<0.001). High sTn expression was associated with negative ER expression (P<0.001), positive HER-2 status (P<0.001), advanced tumor stage (P<0.001), high density of CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) (P=0.028), and positive lymph node metastasis (P=0.002). Moreover, patients with concomitant high expression of both markers had the highest risk of relapse (P<0.001) and mortality (P<0.001). The multivariate Cox regression model revealed that positive sTn expression (HRos: 1.941, 95% CI: 1.168, 3.223, Pos=0.028; HRpfs: 1.739, 95% CI: 1.063, 2.847, Ppfs=0.010) and positive PD-L1 expression (HRos: 1.912, 95% CI: 1.138, 3.212, Pos=0.017; HRpfs: 1.863, 95% CI: 1.116, 3.110, Ppfs=0.014) were independent indicators for poor overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), respectively. BC patients who expressed both sTn and PD-L1 had poorer survival. Therefore, combinational therapy with dual blockade might benefit BC patients with sTn(+)/PD-L1(+) expression, which requires further examination in future clinical trials.

Higher PD-L1 Immunohistochemical Detection Signal in Frozen Compared to Matched Paraffin-Embedded Formalin-Fixed Tissues.

Purpose: Response to anti-PD-L1/PD-1 immunotherapy correlates with PD-L1 expression in breast cancer. However, the prevalence of PD-L1 positive breast cancer is variable, which could be due to differences in the population/cohort of patients tested or the preservation/detection technology used. To investigate this variability, we examined the effect of two tissue preservation methods on PD-L1 immunohistochemical detection in breast cancer. Methods: We compared PD-L1 expression in patient-matched frozen (FR) and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues of breast cancer patients. PD-L1 expression was assessed using tumor proportion score (TPS, simply PD-L1 score), and case positivity was determined with PD-L1 score ≥5. Results: In FFPE tissues, PD-L1 was positive in 7–10% of tested patients, depending on the antibody used. In patient-matched FR tissues, the same antibodies showed positive PD-L1 expression in 20–30% of cases. The impact of the antibody tested on the rate of PD-L1 positivity (% of PDL1 positive cases) was minor, as evident in the near perfect concordance between PD-L1 score obtained using the different antibodies whether tested in FR or FFPE tissues. However, there was a systematic drop by an average of 13–20% in the PD-L1 score obtained in FFPE tissues compared to their patient-matched FR tissues. Conclusions: In the tested patient-matched cohort, there was consistently a higher PD-L1 score in FR than FFPE tissues, regardless of the antibody used, demonstrating a significant effect on PD-L1 detection due to the preservation method. These findings should inspire further work to improve the sensitivity of PD-L1 detection and possibly search for more sensitive antibodies in FFPE tissues.

TET2 Inhibits PD-L1 Gene Expression in Breast Cancer Cells through Histone Deacetylation.

Simple SummaryProgrammed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) is an essential immune checkpoint molecule that helps tumor cells to escape the immune surveillance. The aim of the current study was to investigate the epigenetic mechanisms underlying the aberrant expression of PD-L1 in breast cancer cells. Here, we identified TET2 as a negative regulator of PD-L1 gene transcription in breast cancer cells. Mechanistically, TET2 recruits HDAC1/2 to the PD-L1 promoter and facilitates the deacetylation of H3K27ac, resulting to the suppression of PD-L1 gene transcription. Our work reveals an unanticipated role of TET2-HDAC1/2 complex in the regulation of PD-L1 gene expression, providing new insights into the epigenetic mechanisms that drive immune evasion during breast cancer pathogenesis.Activation of PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint is a critical step for the immune evasion of malignant tumors including breast cancer. However, the epigenetic mechanism underlying the aberrant expression of PD-L1 in breast cancer cells remains poorly understood. To investigate the role of TET2 in the regulation of PD-L1 gene expression, quantitative reverse transcription PCR (RT-qPCR), Western blotting, chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay and MeDIP/hMeDIP-qPCR were performed on MCF7 and MDA-MB-231 human breast cancer cells. Here, we reported that TET2 depletion upregulated PD-L1 gene expression in MCF7 cells. Conversely, ectopic expression of TET2 inhibited PD-L1 gene expression in MDA-MB-231 cells. Mechanistically, TET2 protein recruits histone deacetylases (HDACs) to PD-L1 gene promoter and orchestrates a repressive chromatin structure to suppress PD-L1 gene transcription, which is likely independent of DNA demethylation. Consistently, treatment with HDAC inhibitors upregulated PD-L1 gene expression in wild-type (WT) but not TET2 KO MCF7 cells. Furthermore, analysis of the CCLE and TCGA data showed a negative correlation between TET2 and PD-L1 expression in breast cancer. Taken together, our results identify a new epigenetic regulatory mechanism of PD-L1 gene transcription, linking the catalytic activity-independent role of TET2 to the anti-tumor immunity in breast cancer.

Rho-associated protein kinase-dependent moesin phosphorylation is required for PD-L1 stabilization in breast cancer.

Expression of programmed cell death ligand (PD-L1) is associated with poor prognosis in breast cancer. Understanding the regulation of PD-L1 expression in breast cancer could provide a new strategy for breast cancer treatment. Here, we demonstrate that moesin (MSN) phosphorylation by Rho-associated protein kinase (ROCK) stabilizes PD-L1 protein levels. Our results indicate that phosphorylated MSN may compete with the E3 ubiquitin ligase SPOP for binding PD-L1. ROCK inhibition via the Y-27632 inhibitor or MSN silencing decreased PD-L1 expression, resulting in T-cell activation both invitro and invivo. Administration of Y-27632 into immunocompetent Balb/c mice bearing breast tumors suppressed tumor progression and enhanced CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell infiltration. RNA-seq analysis of Y-27632-treated mouse tumors revealed that ROCK inhibition upregulated several immune response genes. However, the combination of Y-27632 and an anti-PD-1 antibody did not show additive or synergistic effects due to reduced PD-L1 in the presence of Y-27632. Our study unravels a previously unappreciated mechanism of PD-L1 regulation through the ROCK-MSN pathway. Moreover, we found that ROCK inhibitors could be combined with breast cancer immunotherapy.

Comparison of three scoring methods using the FDA-approved 22C3 immunohistochemistry assay to evaluate PD-L1 expression in breast cancer and their association with clinicopathologic factors

BackgroundIn the evaluation of PD-L1 expression to select patients for anti-PD-1/PD-L1 treatment, uniform guidelines that account for different immunohistochemistry assays, different cell types and different cutoff values across tumor types are lacking. Data on how different scoring methods compare in breast cancer are scant.MethodsUsing FDA-approved 22C3 diagnostic immunohistochemistry assay, we retrospectively evaluated PD-L1 expression in 496 primary invasive breast tumors that were not exposed to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 treatment and compared three scoring methods (TC: invasive tumor cells; IC: tumor-infiltrating immune cells; TCIC: a combination of tumor cells and immune cells) in expression frequency and association with clinicopathologic factors.ResultsIn the entire cohort, positive PD-L1 expression was observed in 20% of patients by TCIC, 16% by IC, and 10% by TC, with a concordance of 87% between the three methods. In the triple-negative breast cancer patients, positive PD-L1 expression was observed in 35% by TCIC, 31% by IC, and 16% by TC, with a concordance of 76%. Associations between PD-L1 and clinicopathologic factors were investigated according to receptor groups and whether the patients had received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The three scoring methods showed differences in their associations with clinicopathologic factors in all subgroups studied. Positive PD-L1 expression by IC was significantly associated with worse overall survival in patients with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and showed a trend for worse overall survival and distant metastasis-free survival in triple-negative patients with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Positive PD-L1 expression by TCIC and TC also showed trends for worse survival in different subgroups.ConclusionsOur findings indicate that the three scoring methods with a 1% cutoff are different in their sensitivity for PD-L1 expression and their associations with clinicopathologic factors. Scoring by TCIC is the most sensitive way to identify PD-L1-positive breast cancer by immunohistochemistry. As a prognostic marker, our study suggests that PD-L1 is associated with worse clinical outcome, most often shown by the IC score; however, the other scores may also have clinical implications in some subgroups. Large clinical trials are needed to test the similarities and differences of these scoring methods for their predictive values in anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy.

Prognostic Implications of PD-L1 Expression in Breast Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Immunohistochemistry and Pooled Analysis of Transcriptomic Data.

Conflicting data have been reported on the prognostic value of PD-L1 protein and gene expression in breast cancer.Experimental Design: Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science Core Collection were searched, and data were extracted independently by two researchers. Outcomes included pooled PD-L1 protein positivity in tumor cells, immune cells, or both, per subtype and per antibody used, and its prognostic value for disease-free and overall survival. A pooled gene expression analysis of 39 publicly available transcriptomic datasets was also performed. Of the initial 4,184 entries, 38 retrospective studies fulfilled the predefined inclusion criteria. The overall pooled PD-L1 protein positivity rate was 24% (95% CI, 15%-33%) in tumor cells and 33% (95% CI, 14%- 56%) in immune cells. PD-L1 protein expression in tumor cells was prognostic for shorter overall survival (HR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.07-2.46; P = 0.02); there was significant heterogeneity (I2 = 80%, P heterogeneity < 0.001). In addition, higher PD-L1 gene expression predicted better survival in multivariate analysis in the entire population (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.74-0.90; P < 0.001 for OS) and in basal-like tumors (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.52-0.80; P < 0.001 for OS; P interaction 0.005). The largest to our knowledge meta-analysis on the subject informs on PD-L1 protein positivity rates and its prognostic value in breast cancer. Standardization is needed prior to routine implementation. PD-L1 gene expression is a promising prognostic factor, especially in basal-like breast cancer. Discrepant prognostic information might be related to PD-L1 gene expression in the stroma.

Abstract P2-08-25: PD-L1 expression at the protein and RNA levels as prognostic factor in early breast cancer

Abstract Introduction:PD-L1 expression as assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) is a clinically relevant biomarker in certain malignancies such as lung cancer, since it selects appropriate candidates for PD-1 blockade. Since these agents are under evaluation for breast cancer, discovering and validating predictive biomarkers is of outmost importance. However, the clinical utility of PD-L1 expression in breast cancer is questionable, in light of prior inconclusive reports which have used various IHC antibodies, scoring methods and cut-offs. Moreover, there are only few previous studies on comparing IHC and RNA data at the same cohort, not limited to a single subtype.Methods: Our cohort is derived from a nested case-control study consisting of 619 patients diagnosed with primary breast cancer between 1997-2005 in Stockholm health care region.Tissue microarrays from epithelial tumor areas have been constructed using duplicate cores from primary tumors and tissue sections were used for IHC with PD-L1 (Ventana; clone SP263) antibody. Positivity was defined as the presence of any single cell with membranous expression of PD-L1. Gene expression profiling was performed using DNA microarrays (GSE48091). Data on clinical and pathological tumor characteristics, survival, loco-regional and systemic treatments, and follow-up have been collected. Correlations between transcript and protein expression levels were estimated using Mann-Whitney test, while survival analyses were conducted using the Kaplan-Meier method. Furthermore, we associated an immune gene module score (IMS) –whose predictive power in neoadjuvant and metastatic settings has been previously demonstrated- with PD-L1 transcript levels by using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient.Results: IHC data were available for 87.4% (541/619) of the patients. PD-L1 was expressed on tumor cells in 9.6% (52/541) of the patients while it was also expressed by immune cells in 23.1% (125/541) of the patients. Any PD-L1 expression (tumor and/or immune cells) was noted in 24.2% (131/541) of the patients. PD-L1 transcript levels and protein expression on tumor, immune and/or both cell types were statistically significantly associated (p&amp;lt; 2.2e-16). In the whole cohort, patients with higher PD-L1 transcript levels were associated with better breast cancer-specific survival(BCSS) (p=0.0061). In addition, within intrinsic subtypes, high PD-L1 transcript expression was significantly associated with better BCSS only in basal-like (p=0.019) disease. There was no significant correlation between improved BCCS and PD-L1 protein expression by tumor (p=0.13), immune (p=0.12) or both types of cells (p=0.2). PD-L1 transcript levels were also positively associated with the IMS (Spearman's rho = 0.85). Conclusions:The prognostic value of PD-L IHC expression in breast cancer remains inconclusive. However, RNA expression of PD-L1 may be more informative as a prognostic factor, especially in basal-like disease and merits further validation. Citation Format: Zerdes I, Sifakis E, Matikas A, Tobin NP, Charlotte R, Rassidakis GZ, Bergh J, Foukakis T. PD-L1 expression at the protein and RNA levels as prognostic factor in early breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-08-25.

PD-L1 expression in breast cancer: expression in subtypes and prognostic significance: a systematic review.

To systematically review the literature on the expression of PD-L1 in primary BC, variation of expression between subtypes and effect on overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Additionally, for studies in the neoadjuvant setting, we have reviewed the ability of PD-L1 to predict pathological complete response (pCR). Articles included in this review were retrieved by searching PubMed (1966-2018) and EMBASE (1980-2018). The following search terms were used: "PD-L1 expression" and "breast cancer" (PubMed234; EMBASE 161). Thirty-seven articles were found relevant to this study. We summarize important findings from these works, and show that the observed PD-L1 expression in the studies varies greatly, with expression rates ranging from 0 to 83% across subtypes. PD-L1 expression in relation to prognosis both in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy setting remains controversial, with studies finding better, worse, or no effect on prognosis. We also show that a wide variety of strategies are used when evaluating PD-L1 immunohistochemically, e.g., different cut-off points, different cell types evaluated, and different perceptions of when a cell is positive for PD-L1 (cytoplasmic vs membrane staining). Further investigation of PD-L1 expression in breast cancer and its effect on prognosis is required. There is little consensus on the methods used to evaluate PD-L1 expression immunohistochemically, and this may contribute to the diverging results found in this study.

Prognostic implications of PD-L1 expression in breast cancer at the protein and mRNA levels.

e14284 Background: Conflicting data have been reported on the prognostic value of PD-L1 expression per immunohistochemistry (IHC) in breast cancer (BC). There is a paucity of data on the role of PD-L1 gene expression (GE). Methods: Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science Core Collection were searched and data were extracted independently by two researchers. Outcomes included pooled PD-L1 positivity in tumor cells, immune cells or both, per subtype and per antibody used; and the prognostic value of PD-L1 positivity for DFS and OS. Heterogeneity was assessed using the Q and I2 statistics. A pooled GE analysis of 39 publicly available transcriptomic datasets was also performed. Results: Of the initial 4184 entries, 38 retrospective studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The overall pooled PD-L1 positivity rate in tumor cells was 24%, 33% in immune cells and 25% in both; highest positivity was reported with Dako 28-8 clone. PD-L1 IHC expression in tumor cells was prognostic for shorter DFS (HR = 1.36, 95% CI 1.02 – 1.83, p &lt; 0.04) and OS (HR = 1.66; 95% CI 1.09 – 2.50, p = 0.02); there was significant heterogeneity. PD-L1 IHC expression in immune cells was associated with better DFS (HR = 0.61; 95% CI 0.51 – 0.73, p &lt; 0.001) and OS (HR = 0.53, 95% CI 0.39 – 0.73, p &lt; 0.001) in TNBC. In addition, higher PD-L1 GE predicted better survival in multivariate analysis in the entire population (HR = 0.70, 95% CI 0.60 – 0.82, p &lt; 0.001 for DFS and HR = 0.84, 95% CI 0.75 – 0.93, p = 0.001 for OS) and in basal-like tumors (HR = 0.55, 95% CI 0.38 – 0.80, p = 0.001 for DFS and HR = 0.63, 95% CI 0.50 – 0.79, p &lt; 0.001 for OS), pinteraction 0.124 for DFS and 0.005 for OS. Conclusions: The largest to our knowledge meta-analysis on IHC PD-L1 expression in BC informs on PD-L1 positivity rates and its prognostic value. Standardization is needed prior to routine implementation. PD-L1 GE is a promising prognostic factor, especially in basal-like BC.

Clinicopathological correlation of PD-L1 expression in primary and metastatic breast cancer and infiltrating immune cells

Few studies have evaluated the expression of the programmed cell death-1 and its ligand-1 (PD-L1) in breast cancer. In this study, we correlated differential expression of PD-L1 in breast cancer (BC) and its microenvironment from a cohort of patients with BC, paired locally metastatic disease to regional lymph nodes (LNs) and nonpaired distantly metastatic disease (mets). PD-L1 expression was correlated with several pathologic and clinical parameters in tumor and tumor immune cells (ICs; CD3, CD4, CD8, CD20, and CD68) using the Ventana antibody (SP263) in 41 BCs, 46 paired mets in LNs, and 46 distant mets. There was 100% agreement for PD-L1 expression on tumor and ICs between BC and matched LN. PD-L1 is differentially expressed in primary BC and regional nodal disease. Expression correlated with higher grade, hormone receptor negativity, and highly proliferative tumors (P < .001). In LNs, the high positivity rate was driven by triple-negative status (70% versus 5%; P < .0001). In contrast, there was significantly near-total absence of PD-L1 expression in distant mets compared with BC and LNs (2%-4% in mets versus 17%-20% in BC and LN, P = .009). IC density varied in BC and metastatic tumors with predominance of CD3 and CD68 and near total absence of CD20 cells. PD-L1 expression was mainly associated with CD68 cells. There were consistent higher numbers of CD3 (CD8 > CD4) than CD20 cells in primary and metastatic tumors. Correlation of PD-L1 expression in BC and its microenvironment may be useful for the development of new treatment strategies.