Pazopanib Initiation Research Articles

Assessment of Pazopanib-Related Heart Failure in Patients With Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma - A Single Institute Analysis.

Heart failure (HF) is one of the potential adverse events of pazopanib treatment for soft tissue sarcoma (STS), but detailed reports of such HF cases are scarce. This study determined the incidence and risk factors of HF following pazopanib treatment for STS at our Institute and the clinical outcomes. This study retrospectively analyzed the cases of STS patients treated with pazopanib (n=151) between 2012 and 2020. HF occurred in 6 patients (3.9%) at the median onset of 137 (range 14-468) days after the treatment initiation. When their HF was diagnosed, pazopanib was interrupted in all 6 patients. No patients experienced HF-related death, and HF development was not a significant factor for poor overall survival. The cumulative doses of anthracyclines (>225 mg/m2) before pazopanib initiation (83% vs. 37%, P=0.031), pazopanib initiation at age ≥60 years (83% vs. 35%, P=0.026), and the baseline B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) concentration (≥50 pg/mL) before pazopanib (67% vs. 11%, P=0.002) initiation were predictive factors for post-pazopanib treatment HF. The study findings highlight the effect of past anthracycline exposure and baseline BNP for pazopanib-associated HF. Although the study patients' clinical outcomes were generally favorable, periodic monitoring of cardiac function using ultrasonic echocardiography or serum markers is essential to detect events early and begin therapeutic intervention appropriately under a cardiologist's instructions.

Pharmacist-Urologist Collaborative Management for Patients with Renal Cell Carcinoma Receiving Pazopanib Monotherapy.

Pazopanib is one of recommended treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Despite its effectiveness, patients often difficult to continue pazopanib treatment due to adverse events (AEs). We established an ambulatory care pharmacy practice that enables pharmacist-urologist collaboration to manage patients with RCC. This study evaluated the usefulness of this collaborative management. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 51 consecutive patients with metastatic RCC receiving pazopanib at the Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital between April 2014 and December 2020. Our collaborative management was implemented in October 2016. The time to pazopanib discontinuation was compared between patients who started pazopanib before (n = 30) and after (n = 21) the implementation of the collaborative management. A multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed to analyze the factors associated with pazopanib discontinuation. In the collaborative management, the oncology pharmacists had a total of 245 face-to-face patient consultations, and provided 286 suggestions [according to supportive care in pazopanib treatment (214 suggestions) were most frequent], and 236 (82.5%) were accepted by urologists. The median time to discontinuation (6.1 months vs. 2.4 months, p = 0.024) was significantly longer in the after group. Multivariate analysis showed that collaborative management (hazard ratio (HR) 0.49, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.26-0.88, p = 0.017), and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) ≥2 at pazopanib initiation (HR 3.87, 95% CI 1.47-9.13, p = 0.008) were significantly associated with pazopanib discontinuation. These results suggested that, compared to conventional management, collaborative management is effective at prolonging the time to pazopanib discontinuation.

Multicenter real-world experience of the clinical efficacy and tolerance of pazopanib in high-risk pediatric solid tumors (PazoPed)

Pazopanib, a receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, exhibits anti-tumor activity in adult bone and soft-tissue sarcomas (STS), but has not yet been approved for pediatric tumors. The primary objective was to evaluate pazopanib efficacy when used alone or in combination with topotecan. This real-world multicenter retrospective study included patients with solid tumors, aged 25 years or less at the time of initial diagnosis, treated with pazopanib outside of a clinical trial. Nineteen patients were eligible for efficacy analysis: 14 bone tumors and 5 STS. At pazopanib initiation, the median age was 16.9 years, 18 patients had metastatic disease with a median of 2 prior therapeutic lines. With 6.2 months of median follow-up, no objective response was observed, but 10 patients (52.6%) had stable disease at 8 weeks and the 6-month disease control rate was 26.3%. The median progression free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 3.0 months and 6.2 months, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed an inverse relationship between the number of prior treatment lines and PFS and OS (hazard ratio = 1.73 (p = 0.04) and 1.76 (p = 0.03), respectively). Our study showed a potential tumor control activity of pazopanib in pediatric bone and soft tissue sarcomas. Further studies are warranted to determine the optimal timing and condition for pazopanib introduction to maximize the effect.

Different patterns of pneumothorax in patients with soft tissue tumors treated with pazopanib: A case series analysis.

To investigate pneumothorax patterns in pazopanib treatment by focusing on the positional relationship between the visceral pleura and metastatic lung tumor, we examined 20 patients with advanced soft tissue tumors who developed lung metastases and underwent pazopanib treatment between 2012 and 2019. Pneumothorax was classified into two types based on the location of the metastatic lesion around the visceral pleural area before pazopanib treatment: subpleural type, within 5 mm from the pleura; and central type, >5 mm from the pleura. We investigated the rates of pneumothorax and the associated risk factors. Five patients experienced pneumothorax (three subpleural and two central types). Cavitation preceded pneumothorax in 83% of patients and led to connection of the cavitated cyst of the metastatic lesion to the chest cavity in the shorter term in patients with the subpleural type. Conversely, a more gradual increase in the cavity size and sudden cyst rupture were observed in the central type. The risk factors for pneumothorax were cavitation after initiating pazopanib and intervention before pazopanib, either ablation or surgery. The location of the metastatic lesions was not a risk factor for the occurrence of pneumothorax. In conclusion, pneumothorax is an adverse event associated with pazopanib treatment. Therefore, attention must be paid to predisposing factors such as the formation of cavitation after pazopanib initiation and previous interventions to the lungs. Moreover, because subpleural pneumothorax tends to occur earlier than the central type, a different time course can be anticipated based on the positional relationships of the metastatic lesions to the visceral pleura.

A case of uterine sarcoma with pazopanib-induced reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy syndrome

Backgrounds: Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES), clinically manifested as convulsions and impaired consciousness, is characterised by oedematous changes centring around the white matter of the occipital lobe and is a reversible condition. Pazopanib (PAZ) was approved for malignant soft tissue tumours in Japan in September 2012. We herein report our experience of a patient who was administered PAZ for uterine sarcoma and developed PRES. Case: A 64-year-old woman was administered PAZ for uterine sarcoma. On the fourth day of treatment, she was taken to the emergency department with a chief complaint of impaired consciousness (GCS: E4V2M5). Right conjugate deviation without new structural disorder was found in CT. A brain MRI performed on disease day 2 revealed a high-intensity region in the white matter of the left occipital lobe in FLAIR images. Vasogenic brain oedema was indicated and considering her clinical symptoms, PRES was suspected. On disease day 8, PRES was diagnosed as the disappearance of abnormal signals as confirmed by a second MRI. The clinical symptoms and imaging findings were improved, and the patient was discharged from the hospital on disease day 9. Discussion: Only a few cases of PAZ-induced PRES have been reported, of which only one has been reported from Japan. While these cases report the development of PRES within 9 days to 2 months after initiation of PAZ, in our patient, it was developed within three days of PAZ treatment. In general, most cases of PRES are considered reversible and have a good prognosis. However, there are some reports of irreversible PES because of delayed treatment and other factors. Based on the above reasons, we believe that we need to take PRES into account and promptly start treatment if characteristic symptoms are observed after the start of PAZ treatment.

Real-world Clinical Outcomes of Pazopanib Immediately After Discontinuation of Immunotherapy for Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma.

In the first-line (1L) setting, pazopanib (PAZ) has been recommended by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network for the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC). In 2018, immuno-oncology (IO) therapy became a commonly used 1L treatment option for aRCC. We report the real-world clinical outcomes of PAZ after IO therapy for patients with aRCC. We performed a longitudinal, retrospective medical record review study. The included patients were aged≥ 18 years, had initiated second-line and/or beyond PAZ after IO therapy for clear cell aRCC on or before October 2017, and had complete medical records available from the diagnosis of aRCC to the discontinuation of PAZ, death, or the medical record extraction date (May 2018), whichever occurred first. The primary outcome variable was the PAZ duration of therapy. The secondary outcomes were progression-free survival and overall survival since PAZ initiation, the reasons for PAZ discontinuation, and the occurrence of adverse events (AEs). A total of 258 eligible patients had initiated IO therapies before PAZ as follows: nivolumab (68%), nivolumab plus ipilimumab (14%), pembrolizumab (12%), and ipilimumab (3%). Overall, the median PAZ duration of therapy was 13.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.1-16.0 months). The median progression-free survival with PAZ after IO therapy was 13.5 months (95% CI, 11.8 months to not reached). The estimated overall survival rate of PAZ after IO therapy at 6 and 12 months was 93% and 89%, respectively. A total of 109 patients (42%) had reported an AE. The most frequently reported AEs were fatigue (29%) and diarrhea (14%). No additional safety signal of hepatotoxicity was observed (increased aspartate aminotransferase, 5%; increased alanine transaminase, 6%). In the present real-world study, second-line and/or beyond PAZ after previous IO therapy was well-tolerated and effective for patients with aRCC.

Real-world clinical outcomes of pazopanib immediately following immunotherapy discontinuation for the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma.

573 Background: In the first-line setting (1L), pazopanib (PAZ) is recommended by NCCN for treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC). In 2018, immuno-oncology (IO) therapy became commonly used 1L treatment option for aRCC. This study reports real-world clinical outcomes of PAZ following IO therapy among aRCC patients (pts) in an evolving treatment landscape. Methods: This retrospective chart review study used medical record data collected by medical oncologists. Included pts were those ≥ 18 at initiation of IO therapy who initiated 2L+ PAZ for clear cell aRCC before November 2017, and had complete medical records from the diagnosis of aRCC to discontinuation of PAZ, death, or the chart extraction date (May 2018), whichever occurred first. Primary outcome was PAZ duration of therapy (DOT). Secondary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) since PAZ initiation, reasons for PAZ discontinuation, and adverse events (AEs). Time-to-event outcomes were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier method. Results: 258 eligible pts initiated the IO therapies before PAZ as follows: nivolumab (NIVO) (68%), NIVO+ipilimumab (IPI) (14%), pembrolizumab (12%), and IPI (3%). Ninety-seven (38%), 56 (22%), and 92 (36%) pts were grouped as favorable, intermediate, or poor risk by Heng criteria, respectively. Overall, the median PAZ DOT was 13.4 months (Ms) (95% confidence interval [CI] 10.1-16.0). When stratified by lines of therapy, pts who received PAZ as 2L (n=182) or 3L+ (n=76) had DOT of 13.4 Ms (95% CI 11.1-NR) and 9.6 Ms (95% CI 6.2-NR), respectively. The PFS and OS outcomes are shown in the Table. One hundred-nine (42%) pts reported an AE. The most frequently (>10%) reported AEs were fatigue (29%), diarrhea (14%), decreased appetite (14%), and hypertension (13%). Conclusions: In this real-world study, 2+L PAZ following prior IO therapy was well-tolerated, effective, and non-cross-resistant with IO therapy for aRCC pts. [Table: see text]

Pazopanib efficacy and toxicity in a metastatic sarcoma cohort: Are Indian patients different?

There is no study till date determining the spectrum of adverse events of pazopanib in Indian patients with advanced sarcoma. We conducted a retrospective study by analyzing the case records of metastatic sarcoma patients treated with pazopanib from January 2016 to July 2017 in sarcoma medical oncology clinic. Toxicity was assessed according to CTCAE v.4.03 criteria. SPSS version 23 was used for statistical evaluation. A total of 33 patients received pazopanib. The median age was 41 years (range, 19-75 years), with a male predominance (54.5%). Twenty-six patients (78.8%) had ECOG performance status 1 at the time of pazopanib initiation. The most common type of sarcoma was synovial sarcoma, and the mean duration of pazopanib intake in patients was 4.12 months. The median follow-up was 13 months. Median progression-free survival was 5 months, and median overall survival was 18 months. Overall response rate was 6.0%. Out of the 33 patients, 42.4% (n = 14) received it after first line of therapy. Six patients (18.2%) required dose reductions due to toxicity. Thirteen (39.4%) patients experienced CTCAE grade 3 or 4 toxicities. Most common grade 3 and 4 toxicities experienced among patients were hand-foot skin reaction (18.2%) and proteinuria (9.1%). No significant difference was seen when analyzed for variables such as age, sex, ECOG performance status, comorbidities, and number of previous lines received in patients experiencing grade 3 and 4 toxicities. The spectrum of adverse events in Indian patients at doses lower than the recommended dose is distinctly different from the western population. However, this unique toxicity profile needs to be validated in prospective studies.

Dynamic changes of phenotypically different circulating tumor cells sub-populations in patients with recurrent/refractory small cell lung cancer treated with pazopanib

The aim of the study was to investigate the effect of 2nd-line pazopanib on the different CTCs subpopulations in SCLC patients and evaluate the clinical relevance of their changes. Different CTCs subpopulations were evaluated before pazopanib initiation (n = 56 patients), after one-cycle (n = 35) and on disease progression (n = 45) by CellSearch and double immunofluorescence using anti-CKs and anti-Ki67, anti-M30 or anti-Vimentin antibodies. Before treatment, CTCs were detected in 50% of patients by CellSearch whereas 53.4%, 15.5% and 74.1% patients had CK+/Ki67+, CK+/M30+ and CK+/Vim+ CTCs, respectively. One pazopanib cycle significantly decreased the number of CTCs as detected by CellSearch (p = 0.043) as well as the number of CK+/Ki67+ (p < 0.001), CK+/M30+ (p = 0.015) and CK+/Vim+ (p < 0.001) cells. On disease progression, both the incidence and CTC numbers were significantly increased (CellSearch, p = 0.027; CK+/Ki67+, p < 0.001; CK+/M30+, p = 0.001 and CK+/Vim+, p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, the detection of CK+/Vim+ CTCs after one treatment cycle (HR: 7.9, 95% CI: 2.9–21.8; p < 0.001) and CTCs number on disease progression, as assessed by CellSearch, (HR: 2.0, 95% CI: 1.0–6.0; p = 0.005) were emerged as independent factors associated with decreased OS. In conclusion, pazopanib can eliminate different CTC subpopulations in patients with relapsed SCLC. The analysis of CTCs could be used as a dynamic biomarker of treatment efficacy.

Clinical Activity of Pazopanib in Patients with Advanced Desmoplastic Small Round Cell Tumor.

Desmoplastic small round cell tumor (DSRCT) is an aggressive, often fatal soft tissue sarcoma that lacks an optimal salvage regimen. We retrospectively reviewed data from 29 pretreated DSRCT patients who received pazopanib at MD Anderson Cancer Center after failure of standard chemotherapies. Medical records of patients treated from January 2012 to December 2016 were reviewed and regression analyses were performed. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and differences in survival were assessed by a log-rank test. A landmark statistical analysis was used to assess OS at a predefined 12-week time point following pazopanib initiation. The mean age at pazopanib treatment was 27.5 years (range, 6.3-50.1 years). According to RECIST 1.1 criteria, 16 patients (55%) had stable disease, 1 patient (3%) had partial response, 1 patient (3%) had complete response, and 11 patients (38%) had progressive disease. Estimated median PFS was 5.63 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.23-7.47). Median OS was 15.7 months (95% CI: 10.3-32.4). As of December 2016, 11 patients (38%) were still alive, with a median follow-up time of 16.8 (range 3.8-30.1) months. Doses between 400 and 800 mg were included. Pazopanib was well tolerated and 23 (79%) of the patients continued it until progression or death, 4 discontinued because of side effects, and 2 were still on pazopanib at the time of data analysis. In the largest study conducted to date in DSRCT, pazopanib was well tolerated and clinically active in heavily pretreated patients who otherwise lack good treatment options. Desmoplastic small round cell tumor (DSRCT) is a rare, extremely aggressive soft tissue sarcoma subtype that most commonly occurs in adolescent and young adult males. No DSRCT-specific therapies exist, and for lack of a better treatment approach, current therapies have relied upon U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved drugs like pazopanib that exhibit clinical activity in other sarcoma subtypes. This article describes the largest experience to date using pazopanib as salvage treatment in heavily pretreated DSRCT patients. Pazopanib was well tolerated and clinically active, surpassing predefined metrics proposed by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer indicative of "active" sarcoma drugs (5.63 months progression-free survival [PSF], with 62% of the study population achieving progression-free survival at 12 weeks).

Real-world experience of everolimus as second-line treatment in metastatic renal cell cancer after failure of pazopanib.

AimWe aimed to provide real-life data on the outcomes of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients treated with everolimus as second-line treatment after failure of first-line pazopanib.Patients and methodsData from the medical charts of mRCC patients from 8 centers in Greece and Spain were reviewed. All patients had received or were continuing to receive second-line everolimus treatment after failure of first-line treatment with pazopanib. No other previous therapies were allowed. The primary end point was the determination of progression-free survival (PFS).ResultsIn total, 31 patients were enrolled. Of these, 26% had performance status (PS) >0, 88% were of intermediate/poor Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) risk group, and only 61% had undergone prior nephrectomy. Median PFS was 3.48 months (95% CI: 2.37–5.06 months). Median overall survival (OS) from everolimus initiation was 8.9 months (95% CI: 6.47–13.14 months). Median OS from pazopanib initiation was 14.78 months (95% CI: 10.54–19.08 months). Furthermore, 32% of patients temporarily discontinued everolimus due to adverse events (AEs), and 22% of patients discontinued everolimus permanently due to toxicity. Most common toxicities were anemia (29%), stomatitis (26%), pneumonitis (19%), and fatigue (10%). Moreover, 14 AEs (27%) were graded as 3 or 4 and were reported by 13 patients (42%).ConclusionThis study provides data exclusively on the sequence pazopanib–everolimus in mRCC. Everolimus has a favorable safety profile and is active. The short PFS and OS could be attributed to the fact that the pazopanib–everolimus sequence was mainly offered to patients with adverse prognostic features, resulting in a modest increase in the combined OS of our population.

Prescriber Compliance With Liver Monitoring Guidelines for Pazopanib in the Postapproval Setting: Results From a Distributed Research Network.

ObjectivesPazopanib received US Food and Drug Administration approval in 2009 for advanced renal cell carcinoma. During clinical development, liver chemistry abnormalities and adverse hepatic events were observed, leading to a boxed warning for hepatotoxicity and detailed label prescriber guidelines for liver monitoring. As part of postapproval regulatory commitments, a cohort study was conducted to assess prescriber compliance with liver monitoring guidelines.MethodsOver a 4-year period, a distributed network approach was used across 3 databases: US Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, a US outpatient oncology community practice database, and the Dutch PHARMO Database Network. Measures of prescriber compliance were designed using the original pazopanib label guidelines for liver monitoring.ResultsResults from the VA (n = 288) and oncology databases (n = 283) indicate that prescriber liver chemistry monitoring was less than 100%: 73% to 74% compliance with baseline testing and 37% to 39% compliance with testing every 4 weeks. Compliance was highest near drug initiation and decreased over time. Among patients who should have had weekly testing, the compliance was 56% in both databases. The more serious elevations examined, including combinations of liver enzyme elevations meeting the laboratory definition of Hy’s law were infrequent but always led to appropriate discontinuation of pazopanib. Only 4 patients were identified for analysis in the Dutch database; none had recorded baseline testing.ConclusionsIn this population-based study, prescriber compliance was reasonable near pazopanib initiation but low during subsequent weeks of treatment. This study provides information from real-world community practice settings and offers feedback to regulators on the effectiveness of label monitoring guidelines.

Pazopanib treatment slows progression and stabilizes disease in patients with taxane-resistant cutaneous angiosarcoma.

Although cutaneous angiosarcoma (cAS) has one of the worst prognoses among malignant skin tumors, few effective drug options for secondary treatment have been discovered to date because of the limited number of cases. Therefore, this study was aimed at determining pazopanib's potential as a new cAS treatment option. We retrospectively evaluated five patients with taxane-resistant unresectable cAS treated with pazopanib at a university hospital. Their characteristics and treatment outcomes were retrieved from their records. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), disease progression, and toxicity were evaluated; furthermore, the response to pazopanib was assessed in relation to the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR-2). The median PFS from the time of pazopanib initiation was 94days. Two patients showed partial response, two showed stable disease, and one had progressive disease in the case of the best overall response. VEGFR-2 expression was positive in all cases, and patients with high expression had improved median OS compared to that in those with low expression. VEGFR-2 expression was correlated with a longer OS. The most common toxicities were hypertension and anorexia followed by myelosuppression. This is the largest case series reported wherein pazopanib was used for taxane-resistant cAS. Although the cytoreductive effect and survival benefits were not significant in this small sample, we consider pazopanib a valid treatment option for preserving patients' quality of life. Our results suggest pazopanib treatment slows the progression of disease and stabilizes it in patients with taxane-resistant cAS.

Pazopanib plus best supportive care versus best supportive care alone in advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumours resistant to imatinib and sunitinib (PAZOGIST): a randomised, multicentre, open-label phase 2 trial

Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST) are the most common mesenchymal neoplasms of the gastrointestinal tract. Imatinib followed by sunitinib and regorafenib is the standard sequence of treatment for advanced disease. Pazopanib is effective in soft tissue sarcomas but has never been assessed in advanced GIST in a randomised trial. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of pazopanib in patients with previously treated advanced GIST. In this randomised, open-label phase 2 study, we enrolled adults (aged ≥18 years) with advanced GIST resistant to imatinib and sunitinib from 12 comprehensive cancer centres or university hospitals in France and randomly assigned them 1:1 using an interactive web-based centralised platform to 800 mg oral pazopanib once daily in 4-week cycles plus best supportive care or best supportive care alone. Randomisation was stratified by the number of previous treatment regimens (2 vs ≥3); no-one was masked to treatment group allocation. Upon disease progression, patients in the best supportive care group were allowed to switch to pazopanib as compassionate treatment. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival, analysed by intention-to-treat. All randomised participants who received at least one dose of pazopanib were included in the safety analysis. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01323400. Between April 12, 2011, and Dec 9, 2013, 81 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to pazopanib plus best supportive care (n=40) or best supportive care alone (n=41). The median follow-up was 26·4 months (IQR 22·0-37·8) in the pazopanib plus best supportive care group and 28·9 months (22·0-35·2) in the best supportive care group. 4-month investigator-assessed progression-free survival was 45·2% (95% CI 29·1-60·0) in the pazopanib plus best supportive care group versus 17·6% (7·8-30·8) in the best supportive care group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·59, 95% CI 0·37-0·96; p=0·029). Median progression-free survival was 3·4 months (95% CI 2·4-5·6) with pazopanib plus best supportive care and 2·3 months (2·1-3·3) with best supportive care alone (HR 0·59 [0·37-0·96], p=0·03). 36 (88%) of the patients originally assigned to the best supportive care group switched to pazopanib following investigator-assessed disease progression; these patients had a median progression-free survival from pazopanib initiation of 3·5 months (95% CI 2·2-5·2). 55 (72%) of the 76 pazopanib-treated patients had pazopanib-related grade 3 or worse adverse events, the most common of which was hypertension (15 [38%] in the pazopanib plus best supportive care group and 13 [36%] in the best supportive care group). 20 (26%) patients had pazopanib-related serious adverse events (14 [35%] in the pazopanib plus best supportive care group and six [17%] in the best supportive care group), including pulmonary embolism in eight (9%) patients (five [13%] in the pazopanib plus best supportive care group and three [7%] in the best supportive care group). Three pazopanib-related deaths occurred (two pulmonary embolisms [one in each group] and one hepatic cytolysis [in the best supportive care group]). Three adverse event-related but not pazopanib-related deaths occurred in the best supportive care group after switch to pazopanib; these deaths were from hyperammonaemic encephalopathy, pneumopathy, and respiratory failure. Pazopanib plus best supportive care improves progression-free survival compared with best supportive care alone in patients with advanced GIST resistant to imatinib and sunitinib, with a toxicity profile similar to that reported for other sarcomas. This trial provides reference outcome data for future studies of targeted inhibitors in the third-line setting for these patients. GlaxoSmithKline, French National Cancer Institute, EuroSARC (FP7-278742), Centre Léon Bérard.

Hypertension (HTN) as a potential biomarker of efficacy in pazopanib-treated patients with advanced non-adipocytic soft tissue sarcoma. A retrospective study based on European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) 62043 and 62072 trials

BackgroundReliable biomarkers of pazopanib’s efficacy in soft tissue sarcoma (STS) are lacking. Hypertension (HTN) is an on-target effect of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-receptor inhibitors such as pazopanib. We evaluated the association of pazopanib-induced HTN with antitumour efficacy in patients with metastatic non-adipocytic STS. MethodsAssociations between pazopanib-induced-HTN and antitumour efficacy were retrospectively assessed across 2 prospective studies (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) study 62043 and 62072) in metastatic STS patients who received pazopanib 800mg daily. Only patients with baseline blood pressure (BP)<150/90mmHg, were included. BP was measured monthly. HTN was reported according to National Cancer Institute-Common Toxicity Criteria Adverse Events (NCI-CTC AE) grading (v3.0), and as absolute differences compared to baseline. The effect of HTN developing in patients without baseline anti-hypertensive medication was assessed on progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) using a landmark analysis stratified by study; univariately using the Kaplan–Meier method and a log-rank test, and in a multivariate Cox regression model after adjustment for important prognostic factors. ResultsOf the 337 patients eligible for this analysis, 21.7% received anti-hypertensive medication at baseline and had a similar PFS and OS compared to those who did not. In patients without baseline anti-hypertensive medication, 38.6% developed HTN. As the majority of patients developing HTN did so within 5weeks after initiation of pazopanib (68.6%), this time point was used as landmark. Univariately, there was no effect on PFS or OS from occurrence of HTN within 5weeks of treatment expressed either in NCI-CTC AE criteria or as maximal differences from baseline in systolic and diastolic BP. Also in multivariate analysis, after adjusting for important prognostic factors, the occurrence of HTN expressed in the different parameters was not associated with PFS and OS. ConclusionsIn this retrospective analysis, pazopanib-induced HTN did not correlate with outcome in pazopanib-treated STS patients. The occurrence of HTN cannot serve as biomarker in this setting.

Phase I Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Study of Pazopanib in Children With Soft Tissue Sarcoma and Other Refractory Solid Tumors: A Children's Oncology Group Phase I Consortium Report

Pazopanib, an oral multikinase angiogenesis inhibitor, prolongs progression-free survival in adults with soft tissue sarcoma (STS). A phase I pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study of two formulations of pazopanib was performed in children with STS or other refractory solid tumors. Pazopanib (tablet formulation) was administered once daily in 28-day cycles at four dose levels (275 to 600 mg/m(2)) using the rolling-six design. Dose determination for a powder suspension was initiated at 50% of the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) for the intact tablet. Ten patients with STS underwent dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) scanning at baseline and 15 ± 2 days after initiation of pazopanib at the tablet MTD. Fifty-three patients were enrolled; 51 were eligible (26 males; median age, 12.9 years; range, 3.8 to 23.9 years). Hematologic and nonhematologic toxicities were generally mild, with dose-limiting lipase, amylase, and ALT elevation, proteinuria, and hypertension. One patient with occult brain metastasis had grade 4 intracranial hemorrhage. The MTD was 450 mg/m(2) for tablet and 160 mg/m(2) for suspension. Steady-state trough concentrations were reached by day 15 and did not seem to be dose dependent. One patient each with hepatoblastoma or desmoplastic small round cell tumor achieved a partial response; eight patients had stable disease for ≥ six cycles, seven of whom had sarcoma. All patients with evaluable DCE-MRI (n = 8) experienced decreases in tumor blood volume and permeability (P < .01). Placental growth factor increased, whereas endoglin and soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 decreased (P < .01; n = 41). Pazopanib is well tolerated in children, with evidence of antiangiogenic effect and potential clinical benefit in pediatric sarcoma.

Abstract C108: An expanded imaging cohort of pazopanib in children and adolescents with relapsed or refractory soft tissue sarcoma (ADVL0815): A Children's Oncology Group phase I consortium trial.

Abstract Background: Pazopanib (NCT00929903) is an orally available small molecule inhibitor of VEGFR 1–3, PDGFR α/β, and c-kit, which has been shown to prolong progression free survival in adults with soft tissue sarcoma (STS). Following a standard phase I dose escalation trial to determine the pediatric maximum tolerated dose (MTD), an expanded cohort of children and adolescents with relapsed and refractory STS and at least one lesion amenable to dynamic contrast enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) was studied to explore changes in tumor blood volume and vascular permeability following initiation of pazopanib, and to correlate these changes with clinical outcome. Methods: Oral pazopanib was administered at 450mg/m2 once daily in 28 day cycles, for up to 24 cycles. DCE-MRI scans were obtained at baseline and within 15 × 2 days after initiation of pazopanib. DCE-MRI data sets were analyzed using a two compartment kinetic model yielding estimates of fractional blood volume and the permeability transfer constant (Ki). Results: 10 subjects were enrolled [5 male; median age 17 yrs (range, 8–23)], of whom 8 had paired DCE-MRI scans of sufficient quality to be evaluable. Subjects received a median of 4 cycles (range 1–7; 3 remain on study receiving courses 6, 7 and 8). One subject had a dose limiting toxicity of Gr3 back and extremity pain with Gr3 sensory neuropathy. Other non-dose limiting toxicities occurring in &amp;gt;10% of subjects (n=10) during the first cycle included mild myelosuppression, sinus bradycardia, fatigue, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, anorexia, dehydration, dizziness, headache, liver transaminase elevation and hyperglycemia. All subjects with evaluable DCE-MRI (n=8) experienced a decrease in tumor blood volume following initiation of pazopanib, with a mean pre-treatment level of 16% (range 1–29%) versus 7% (0–15%) post-treatment (p&amp;lt;0.01). Similarly all subjects had a decrease in Ki with mean pretreatment values of 7.74 (range 2.31–20.38) ml/100g/min, decreasing post-treatment to 4.28 (range 0.19–12.60) ml/100g/min (p&amp;lt;0.01). Although limited by the small sample size, there is a suggestion that patients with best response of stable disease appear to have lower tumor blood volume at baseline than those with progressive disease. Conclusions: DCE-MRI changes in tumor blood volume and Ki in pediatric and adolescent patients with soft tissue sarcoma are supportive of physiological activity and the antiangiogenic mechanism of pazopanib. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference: Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2011 Nov 12-16; San Francisco, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2011;10(11 Suppl):Abstract nr C108.

Abstract P2-14-02: A Pilot Study of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Inhibition with Pazopanib in Patients (pts) with Lymphedema Following Breast Cancer Treatment

Abstract Purpose: Lymphedema is a significant long-term complication of primary therapy for breast cancer. VEGF has a major impact on vascular permeability and lymphangiogenesis. In a prior case control study, we found a significant increase in serum VEGF-C (median 6895 vs. 5349 pg/mL, p=0.0016) in women with lymphedema compared to women without lymphedema suggesting inhibition of VEGF-C as a potential therapeutic strategy. Methods: Pts with significant unilateral lymphedema were treated with pazopanib 800 mg/day continuously. Baseline assessments include arm volume, interstitial fluid pressure (IFP), extracellular fluid volume by lymphometer (ECF), quality of life (QOL) and plasma VEGF-C,-D, and R3. IFP was measured serially for 24 hours after the first treatment; arm volume, ECF, QOL, and plasma VEGF-C/D/R3 are assessed every 4 weeks. Results: Ten pts were enrolled. Median duration of lymphedema was 3.5 years (0.7-8.2) Median time since surgery was 5.1 years (1.0-14.2); median time since radiation (n=9) was 4.7 years (0.4-8.8). Complete IFP data are available in 7 pts. Baseline IFP was significantly higher in the affected compared to unaffected arm (mean 5.73 vs. -1.78 mmHg; p=0.0005). Mean IFP in the affected arm decreased an average of 76% 24 hours after initiation of pazopanib (5.73 vs. 1.56 mmHg; p=0.0061). Toxicity was greater than anticipated with grade 3 fatigue (n=3), arthralgia (n=2), and anorexia (n=1); three pts discontinued therapy prior to the first post-treatment assessment. Five pts met the definition of response with a ≥25% reduction in excess arm volume four weeks after initiating treatment. ECF significantly (p=0.014) decreased as well though the mean difference in excess arm volume did not significantly change (p=0.06). Conclusions: Preliminary data supports the hypothesis that VEGF plays a role in the development and/or persistence of lymphedema after local therapy for breast cancer. Pazopanib acutely decreases IFP, leading to a decrease in ECF and modest improvement in arm volume but results in significant toxicity at the dose used on this study. Subsequent studies will explore a lower dose of pazopanib in this population. This study was supported by the Breast Cancer Research Foundation with pazopanib supplied by GSK. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2010;70(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-14-02.

Congrès de la Société d'hématologie et d'immunologie pédiatrique 12-13 Octobre 2004. Le Kremlin-Bicêtre

Reliable biomarkers of pazopanib’s efficacy in soft tissue sarcoma (STS) are lacking. Hypertension (HTN) is an on-target effect of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-receptor inhibitors such as pazopanib. We evaluated the association of pazopanib-induced HTN with antitumour efficacy in patients with metastatic non-adipocytic STS.Associations between pazopanib-induced-HTN and antitumour efficacy were retrospectively assessed across 2 prospective studies (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) study 62043 and 62072) in metastatic STS patients who received pazopanib 800 mg daily. Only patients with baseline blood pressure (BP) < 150/90 mmHg, were included. BP was measured monthly. HTN was reported according to National Cancer Institute-Common Toxicity Criteria Adverse Events (NCI-CTC AE) grading (v3.0), and as absolute differences compared to baseline. The effect of HTN developing in patients without baseline anti-hypertensive medication was assessed on progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) using a landmark analysis stratified by study; univariately using the Kaplan–Meier method and a log-rank test, and in a multivariate Cox regression model after adjustment for important prognostic factors.Of the 337 patients eligible for this analysis, 21.7% received anti-hypertensive medication at baseline and had a similar PFS and OS compared to those who did not. In patients without baseline anti-hypertensive medication, 38.6% developed HTN. As the majority of patients developing HTN did so within 5 weeks after initiation of pazopanib (68.6%), this time point was used as landmark. Univariately, there was no effect on PFS or OS from occurrence of HTN within 5 weeks of treatment expressed either in NCI-CTC AE criteria or as maximal differences from baseline in systolic and diastolic BP. Also in multivariate analysis, after adjusting for important prognostic factors, the occurrence of HTN expressed in the different parameters was not associated with PFS and OS.In this retrospective analysis, pazopanib-induced HTN did not correlate with outcome in pazopanib-treated STS patients. The occurrence of HTN cannot serve as biomarker in this setting.