Pax6 Paired Domain Research Articles

Whole-genome sequencing of multiple related individuals with type 2 diabetes reveals an atypical likely pathogenic mutation in the PAX6 gene

Pathogenic variants in more than 14 genes have been implicated in monogenic diabetes; however, a significant fraction of individuals with young-onset diabetes and a strong family history of diabetes have unknown genetic etiology. To identify novel pathogenic alleles for monogenic diabetes, we performed whole-genome sequencing (WGS) on four related individuals with type 2 diabetes – including one individual diagnosed at the age of 31 years – that were negative for mutations in known monogenic diabetes genes. The individuals were ascertained from a large case-control study and had a multi-generation family history of diabetes. Identity-by-descent (IBD) analysis revealed that the four individuals represent two sib-pairs that are third-degree relatives. A novel missense mutation (p.P81S) in the PAX6 gene was one of eight rare coding variants across the genome shared IBD by all individuals and was inherited from affected mothers in both sib-pairs. The mutation affects a highly conserved amino acid located in the paired-domain of PAX6 - a hotspot for missense mutations that cause aniridia and other eye abnormalities. However, no eye-related phenotype was observed in any individual. The well-established functional role of PAX6 in glucose-induced insulin secretion and the co-segregation of diabetes in families with aniridia provide compelling support for the pathogenicity of this mutation for diabetes. The mutation could be classified as “likely pathogenic” with a posterior probability of 0.975 according to the ACMG/AMP guidelines. This is the first PAX6 missense mutation that is likely pathogenic for autosomal-dominant adult-onset diabetes without eye abnormalities.

PAX6 missense variants in two families with isolated foveal hypoplasia and nystagmus: evidence of paternal postzygotic mosaicism

PAX6 is considered the master regulator of eye development, the majority of variants affecting this gene cause the pan-ocular developmental eye disorder aniridia. Although no genotype-phenotype correlations are clearly established, missense variants affecting the DNA-binding paired domain of PAX6 are usually associated with non-aniridia phenotypes like microphthalmia, coloboma or isolated foveal hypoplasia. In this study, we report two missense heterozygous variants in the paired domain of PAX6 resulting in isolated foveal hypoplasia with nystagmus in two independent families: c.112 C > G; p.(Arg38Gly) and c.214 G > C; p.(Gly72Arg) in exons 5 and 6, respectively. Furthermore, we provide evidence that paternal postzygotic mosaicism is the cause of inheritance, with clinically unaffected fathers and reduced affected allele fraction. This work contributes to increase the phenotypic spectrum caused by PAX6 variants, and to our knowledge, is the first report to describe the presence of postzygotic parental mosaicism causing isolated foveal hypoplasia with nystagmus. These results support the growing evidence that suggest an overestimation of sporadic cases with PAX6 variants, which has strong implications for both genetic counselling and family planning.

A novel nuclear localization signal spans the linker of the two DNA-binding subdomains in the conserved paired domain of Pax6.

Paired box (Pax) 6, a member of the Pax family of transcription factors, contains two DNA-binding domains, called the paired domain (PD) and the homeodomain (HD), and plays pivotal roles in development of structures such as the eye, central nervous system and pancreas. Pax6 is a major developmental switching molecule because, for example, ectopic expression of the Pax6 gene can induce ectopic whole eye development. Intensive research has been devoted to elucidating the molecular mechanism(s) involved in the function(s) of Pax6, but many issues remain unexplained. One of the important issues is to identify the nuclear localization signal (NLS) in the PD of Pax6, which is predicted to have a stronger NLS activity than that in the HD. We produced expression plasmid constructs that encode the chick Pax6 protein modified to delete the entire PD except for fragments containing putative NLS sequences, and electroporated them in ovo into the developing chick midbrain to define the NLS of the PD. The results show that the NLS in the PD of chick Pax6 consists of an unusually long sequence of 36 amino acid residues. Within this long NLS motif, the central 18 amino acids comprising two consecutive nine-residue segments showed highest NLS activity; this central area corresponds to the C-terminal half of the third α-helix of the PAI subdomain and the subsequent 11 amino acids of a 16-residue linker between PAI and the adjacent RED subdomain. This information helps to elucidate the molecular mechanism by which Pax6 plays a pivotal role during ontogeny.

Transcriptional complexes involving PAX3‐FOXO1

Rhabdomyosarcoma is a rare soft tissue cancer that most often affects children and young adults but can occur at any age. Of the three types of Rhabdomyosarcoma, Embryonal, Alveolar, and Anaplastic, we focus on Alveolar Rhabdomyosarcoma (ARMS). Patients with ARMS have a chromosomal translocation that results in the production of a fusion protein, PAX3‐FOXO1. Although there are other translocations present in ARMS patients, PAX3‐FOXO1 is the most common and is liked with a more aggressive disease phenotype. A search of an updated ChIP‐seq screen of 3881 PAX3‐FOXO1 putative binding sites revealed that 36% contained both a PAX3 paired domain and FOXO1 recognition sequence within close proximity. With the knowledge that protein‐protein interactions involving FOXO1 have been shown to contribute to DNA targeting, we then examined the regions surrounding these dual motifs for the presence of common transcription factor binding sites. A number of common recognition sites, including those for MYOD, AP4R, and NEUR were overrepresented as compared to the expected distribution of these sequences in the genome. We are currently examining the contribution of these and other transcription factors to PAX3‐FOXO1 DNA‐binding through several in vitro assays. Identification of PAX3‐FOXO1 binding partners will give more detail about the mechanism of PAX3‐FOXO1 targeting and gene activation.Support or Funding InformationNIH SC2GM095430UNCF Stem Scholars Program (USSP)NIH‐BUILD (TL4MD009637)

Functional dissection of the Pax6 paired domain: Roles in neural tube patterning and peripheral nervous system development

During development of the CNS, stem and progenitor cell proliferation, cell fate designation, and patterning decisions are tightly regulated by interdependent networks of key transcriptional regulators. In a genetic approach we analyzed divergent functionality of the PAI and RED sub-domains of the Pax6 Paired domain (PD) during progenitor zone formation, motor and interneuron development, and peripheral connectivity at distinct levels within the neural tube: within the hindbrain, mutation of the PAI sub-domain severely affected patterning of the p3 and pMN domains and establishment of the corresponding motor neurons. Exit point designation of hypoglossal axons was disturbed in embryos harboring either mutations in the PD sub-domains or containing a functional Pax6 Null allele. At brachial spinal levels, we propose a selective involvement of the PAI sub-domain during patterning of ventral p2 and pMN domains, critically disturbing generation of specific motor neuron subtypes and increasing V2 interneuron numbers. Our findings present a novel aspect of how Pax6 not only utilizes its modular structure to perform distinct functions via its paired and homeodomain. Individual sub-domains can exert distinct functions, generating a new level of complexity for transcriptional regulation by one single transcription factor not only in dorso-ventral, but also rostro-caudal neural tube patterning.

PAX3‐FOXO1 Directed Transcriptional Activation is Mediated by PAX3 and FOXO1 Recognition Sequences

Alveolar Rhabdomyosarcoma (ARMS) patients carrying a chromosomal translocation of PAX3 and FOXO1 have the highest mortality rates, indicating the importance of understanding how this transcription factor influences gene expression. A search of an updated ChIP-seq screen of 3881 PAX3-FOXO1 putative binding sites revealed that 36% contained both a PAX3 paired domain and FOXO1 recognition sequence within close proximity. These data along with in vitro studies with several known and putative PAX3-FOXO1 targets suggest that both the PAX3 and FOXO1 DNA-binding domains mediate interactions with DNA. In addition, mutation of either the FOXO1 element or amino acids in the FOXO1 DNA-binding domain result in decreased PAX3-FOXO1 directed transcriptional activation. However, there exist many sequence variations within these putative binding sites, representing a need to perform further investigations to identify the sequence limitations of the PAX3-FOXO1 interaction. We are also interested in the biological environment in which PAX3-FOXO1 gene activation occurs and have determined a number of transcription factors that are overrepresented in regions that contain putative PAX3-FOXO1 dual motifs.

Crystallization and preliminary X-ray diffraction analysis of the Pax9 paired domain bound to a DC5 enhancer DNA element.

Pax genes belong to a family of metazoan transcription factors that are known to play a critical role in eye, ear, kidney and neural development. The mammalian Pax family of transcription factors is characterized by a ∼128-amino-acid DNA-binding paired domain that makes sequence-specific contacts with DNA. The diversity in Pax gene activities emerges from complex modes of interaction with enhancer regions and heterodimerization with multiple interaction partners. Based on in vitro optimal binding-site selection studies and enhancer identification assays, it has been suggested that Pax proteins may recognize and bind their target DNA elements with different binding modes/topologies, however this hypothesis has not yet been structurally explored. One of the most extensively studied DNA target elements of the Pax6 paired domain is the eye-lens specific DC5 (δ-crystallin) enhancer element. In order to shed light on Pax6-DC5 DNA interactions, the related paired-domain prototype Pax9 was crystallized with the minimal δ-crystallin DC5 enhancer element and preliminary X-ray diffraction analysis was attempted. A 3.0 Å resolution native data set was collected at the National Synchrotron Light Source (NSLS), Brookhaven from crystals grown in a solution consisting of 10%(w/v) PEG 20K, 20%(v/v) PEG 550 MME, 0.03 M NaNO3, 0.03 M Na2HPO4, 0.03 M NH2SO4, 0.1 M MES/imidazole pH 6.5. The data set was indexed and merged in space group C2221, with unit-cell parameters a = 75.74, b = 165.59, c = 70.14 Å, α = β = γ = 90°. The solvent content in the unit cell is consistent with the presence of one Pax9 paired domain bound to duplex DNA in the asymmetric unit.

The hunt for a PAX3‐FOXO1 motif (939.4)

Alveolar Rhabdomyosarcoma (ARMS) patients carrying a chromosomal translocation of PAX3 and FOXO1 have the highest mortality rates, indicating the importance of understanding how this transcription factor influences gene expression. Many studies have been performed to identify PAX3‐FOXO1 target genes and while some overlapping gene sets have been identified, there exists great variation in the genes identified. The search for these target genes is hampered by a lack of understanding of the full DNA‐binding capabilities of this fusion protein. We have examined the truncated FOXO1 DNA‐binding domain in PAX3‐FOXO1 and found that it retains activity, but does not have the same sequence specifications for binding as full length FOXO1. A search of 1463 PAX3‐FOXO1 putative binding sites revealed that 37% contained both a PAX3 paired domain and FOXO1 recognition sequence within close proximity. The sequences containing the dual motif mapped to 160 genes with the most interesting of these known to be regulated by PAX3‐FOXO1 such as MET or upregulated in response to PAX3‐FOXO1 expression such as ABAT and PBK. Here we present additional data exploring the sequence variations on the PAX3 and FOXO1 recognition sequences found within Pax3‐FOXO1 putative binding sites as well as in vitro confirmation of the interaction.Grant Funding Source: Supported by NIH SC2GM095430

An Allelic Series at the Paired Box Gene 6 (Pax6) Locus Reveals the Functional Specificity of Pax Genes

The advent of the ocular and nervous system in metazoan evolution coincides with the diversification of a single ancestral paired box (Pax) gene into Pax6, Pax6(5a), and Pax2. To investigate the role of these Pax genes in neural development, we have generated an allelic series of knock-in models at the Pax6 locus. We showed that although Pax6(5a) and Pax2 could not replace Pax6 for its autoregulation in lens induction or for neural differentiation in retina, Pax6(5a) was sufficient for corneal-lenticular detachment. In brain development, cell proliferation in the cerebral cortex and dorsoventral patterning of the telencephalon and neural tube were partially rescued in either knock-in mutant. Contrary to the previous belief, our genetic studies showed that the Pax6 isoform Pax6(5a) could potentially play a role in neuronal differentiation in brain development. Importantly, Pax2 showed greater rescue efficiency than Pax6(5a) in the telencephalon even though the latter was identical to Pax6 outside the paired domain. In studying Ngn2, a Pax6 direct target gene in telencephalon, we showed that the level of Ngn2 expression correlated with the in vitro binding of Pax2, Pax6, and Pax6(5a) paired domain on its enhancer. Our results show that Pax6 is uniquely required for eye development, but in brain development, Pax6 can be functionally substituted by related Pax family genes that share a similar paired domain binding specificity.

Clinical and mutation analysis of 51 probands with anophthalmia and/or severe microphthalmia from a single center

Clinical evaluation and mutation analysis was performed in 51 consecutive probands with severe eye malformations – anophthalmia and/or severe microphthalmia – seen in a single specialist ophthalmology center. The mutation analysis consisted of bidirectional sequencing of the coding regions of SOX2, OTX2, PAX6 (paired domain), STRA6, BMP4, SMOC1, FOXE3, and RAX, and genome-wide array-based copy number assessment. Fifteen (29.4%) of the 51 probands had likely causative mutations affecting SOX2 (9/51), OTX2 (5/51), and STRA6 (1/51). Of the cases with bilateral anophthalmia, 9/12 (75%) were found to be mutation positive. Three of these mutations were large genomic deletions encompassing SOX2 (one case) or OTX2 (two cases). Familial inheritance of three intragenic, plausibly pathogenic, and heterozygous mutations was observed. An unaffected carrier parent of an affected child with an identified OTX2 mutation confirmed the previously reported nonpenetrance for this disorder. Two families with SOX2 mutations demonstrated a parent and child both with significant but highly variable eye malformations. Heterozygous loss-of-function mutations in SOX2 and OTX2 are the most common genetic pathology associated with severe eye malformations and bi-allelic loss-of-function in STRA6 is confirmed as an emerging cause of nonsyndromal eye malformations.

Transcriptional activity of paired homeobox Pax6 is enhanced by histone acetyltransferase Tip60 during mouse retina development

Pax6 is a member of the Pax family of transcription factors that contains a DNA binding paired-box and homeobox domain. In animals, including humans, Pax6 plays a key role in development, regulating organogenesis of the eye and brain. The current data show that histone acetyltransferase Tip60 physically interacts with Pax6 in developing post-natal day 4 (P4) mouse retinas. We also found that Tip60 binds with paired-domain of Pax6 using its chromo- and zinc-finger-containing regions, and that these protein interactions were needed for the effective full-transcriptional activation of Pax6. Furthermore, among the combinations of Pax6-target gene interactions using its two DNA binding domain, paired- and homeobox domain, Tip60 significantly enhanced the transcriptional activity of Pax6 on the paired-domain binding sequence (P6CON) containing reporter construct (pCON) than other homeo domain and chimera binding containing pP3 and pCON/P3 constructs. Taken together, these results suggest that Tip60 binds with Pax6 and that this physical interaction leads to the full-transcriptional activation of Pax6 during retina development.

Pax3 Stimulates p53 Ubiquitination and Degradation Independent of Transcription

BackgroundPax3 is a developmental transcription factor that is required for neural tube and neural crest development. We previously showed that inactivating the p53 tumor suppressor protein prevents neural tube and cardiac neural crest defects in Pax3-mutant mouse embryos. This demonstrates that Pax3 regulates these processes by blocking p53 function. Here we investigated the mechanism by which Pax3 blocks p53 function.Methodology/Principal FindingsWe employed murine embryonic stem cell (ESC)-derived neuronal precursors as a cell culture model of embryonic neuroepithelium or neural crest. Pax3 reduced p53 protein stability, but had no effect on p53 mRNA levels or the rate of p53 synthesis. Full length Pax3 as well as fragments that contained either the DNA-binding paired box or the homeodomain, expressed as GST or FLAG fusion proteins, physically associated with p53 and Mdm2 both in vitro and in vivo. In contrast, Splotch Pax3, which causes neural tube and neural crest defects in homozygous embryos, bound weakly, or not at all, to p53 or Mdm2. The paired domain and homeodomain each stimulated Mdm2-mediated ubiquitination of p53 and p53 degradation in the absence of the Pax3 transcription regulatory domains, whereas Splotch Pax3 did not stimulate p53 ubiquitination or degradation.Conclusions/SignificancePax3 inactivates p53 function by stimulating its ubiquitination and degradation. This process utilizes the Pax3 paired domain and homeodomain but is independent of DNA-binding and transcription regulation. Because inactivating p53 is the only required Pax3 function during neural tube closure and cardiac neural crest development, and inactivating p53 does not require Pax3-dependent transcription regulation, this indicates that Pax3 is not required to function as a transcription factor during neural tube closure and cardiac neural crest development. These findings further suggest novel explanations for PAX3 functions in human diseases, such as in neural crest-derived cancers and Waardenburg syndrome types 1 and 3.

Relative roles of the different Pax6 domains for pancreatic alpha cell development

BackgroundThe transcription factor Pax6 functions in the specification and maintenance of the differentiated cell lineages in the endocrine pancreas. It has two DNA binding domains, the paired domain and the homeodomain, in addition to a C-terminal transactivation domain. The phenotype of Pax6-/- knockout mice suggests non-redundant functions of the transcription factor in the development of glucagon-expressing α-cells as this cell type is absent in the mutants. We ask the question of how the differentiation of pancreatic endocrine cells, in particular that of α-cells, is affected by selective inactivation of either one of the three major domains of Pax6.ResultsThe Pax6Aey18 mutant mouse line, in which the paired domain is inactivated, showed a phenotype similar to that of Pax6-/- knockout mice with a near complete absence of glucagon-positive α-cells (0-4 cells/section; ≤1% of wt), reduced β-cell area (74% of wt) and disorganized islets. The proportion of ghrelin-positive ε-cells was expanded. In Pax6Sey-Neu mutants, which lack the transactivation domain, α-and β-cells where reduced to 25 and 40% of wt, respectively. We also studied two mouse lines with mutations in the homeodomain, Pax64Neu and Pax6132-14Neu. Neighboring amino acids are affected in the two lines and both point mutations abolish DNA binding of the classical P3 homeodomain target sequence. The pancreatic phenotype of the two mutants however was divergent. While Pax64Neu homozygotes showed a reduction of α- and β-cells to 59 and 61%, respectively, pancreatic endocrine development was unaltered in the Pax6132-14Neu mutant strain.ConclusionsWe show that inactivation of the Pax6 paired domain leads to a more severe phenotype with regards to the differentiation of pancreatic α-cells than the loss of the transactivation domain. The analysis of two different homeodomain mutants suggests that the binding of Pax6 to P3 homeodomain consensus sequences is not required for α-cell development. It rather seems that the homeodomain has a modulating role in Pax6 function, possibly by facilitating a PH0-like binding confirmation on paired domain target genes like proglucagon. This function is differentially affected by the two homeodomain mutations analyzed in this study.

Pax6-5a Promotes Neuronal Differentiation of Murine Embryonic Stem Cells

Pax6 genes are highly conserved and important for eye development. Vertebrates predominantly produce two alternatively spliced Pax6 isoforms, Pax6 and Pax6-5a. Pax6-5a differs from Pax6 by the presence of 14 additional amino acids encoded by exon 5a. These additional amino acids occur in the Pax6 paired domain and thus influence its DNA-binding properties. However, little is known about Pax6-5a's physiological functions. Here we establish murine embryonic stem (ES) cell lines in which expression of either the human Pax6 or Pax6-5a isoform is negatively controlled by tetracycline. We report that, in contrast to Pax6 expression, Pax6-5a expression strongly induces ES cells to differentiate into neurons. Moreover, using DNA microarray analysis, we have identified the transcription factor basic helix loop-helix domain containing, class b2 (bHLHb2) in Pax6-5a-expressing ES cells. Our Pax6 isoform-expressing ES cell lines may serve as useful models for identifying Pax6-regulated genes that are important for neurogenesis and/or eye development.

Regulatory Pathway Analysis by High-Throughput In Situ Hybridization

Automated in situ hybridization enables the construction of comprehensive atlases of gene expression patterns in mammals. Such atlases can become Web-searchable digital expression maps of individual genes and thus offer an entryway to elucidate genetic interactions and signaling pathways. Towards this end, an atlas housing ∼1,000 spatial gene expression patterns of the midgestation mouse embryo was generated. Patterns were textually annotated using a controlled vocabulary comprising >90 anatomical features. Hierarchical clustering of annotations was carried out using distance scores calculated from the similarity between pairs of patterns across all anatomical structures. This process ordered hundreds of complex expression patterns into a matrix that reflects the embryonic architecture and the relatedness of patterns of expression. Clustering yielded 12 distinct groups of expression patterns. Because of the similarity of expression patterns within a group, members of each group may be components of regulatory cascades. We focused on the group containing Pax6, an evolutionary conserved transcriptional master mediator of development. Seventeen of the 82 genes in this group showed a change of expression in the developing neocortex of Pax6-deficient embryos. Electromobility shift assays were used to test for the presence of Pax6-paired domain binding sites. This led to the identification of 12 genes not previously known as potential targets of Pax6 regulation. These findings suggest that cluster analysis of annotated gene expression patterns obtained by automated in situ hybridization is a novel approach for identifying components of signaling cascades.

PAX6 and SOX2‐dependent regulation of the Sox2 enhancer N‐3 involved in embryonic visual system development

Sox2 is universally expressed in the neural and placodal primordia in early stage embryos, and this expression depends on various phylogenetically conserved enhancers having different regional and temporal specificities. The enhancer N-3 was identified as a regulator of the Sox2 gene active in the diencephalon, optic vesicle, and after the contact of the vesicle with the ectoderm, in the lens placodal surface area, suggesting its involvement in embryonic visual system development. A 36-bp minimal essential core sequence was defined in the 568-bp-long enhancer N-3, which in a tetrameric form emulates the original enhancer activity. The core sequence comprises a SOX-binding sequence and a non-canonical PAX6 (Paired domain) binding sequence, and is activated by the synergistic action of SOX2 and PAX6 in transfected cells. The SOX and PAX6 binding sequences of the N-3 core are arranged with the same orientation and spacing as the DC5 sequence of the delta-crystallin enhancer previously demonstrated to be cooperatively bound by SOX2 and PAX6. The N-3 core sequence was also bound by these factors in a cooperative fashion, but with a higher threshold of these factors' levels than DC5, and the enhancer effect of the tetrameric sequence activated by exogenous SOX2 and PAX6 was less pronounced than that of DC5. The observations suggest that gene activation mechanisms that depend on the cooperative interaction of SOX2 and PAX6 but with different thresholds of the factor levels are crucial for the regulation of visual system development.

The MH1 domain of Smad3 interacts with Pax6 and represses autoregulation of the Pax6 P1 promoter.

Pax6 transcription is under the control of two main promoters (P0 and P1), and these are autoregulated by Pax6. Additionally, Pax6 expression is under the control of the TGFβ superfamily, although the precise mechanisms of such regulation are not understood. The effect of TGFβ on Pax6 expression was studied in the FHL124 lens epithelial cell line and was found to cause up to a 50% reduction in Pax6 mRNA levels within 24 h. Analysis of luciferase reporters showed that Pax6 autoregulation of the P1 promoter, and its induction of a synthetic promoter encoding six paired domain-binding sites, were significantly repressed by both an activated TGFβ receptor and TGFβ ligand stimulation. Subsequently, a novel Pax6 binding site in P1 was shown to be necessary for autoregulation, indicating a direct influence of Pax6 protein on P1. In transfected cells, and endogenously in FHL124 cells, Pax6 co-immunoprecipitated with Smad3 following TGFβ receptor activation, while in GST pull-down experiments, the MH1 domain of Smad3 was observed binding the RED sub-domain of the Pax6 paired domain. Finally, in DNA adsorption assays, activated Smad3 inhibited Pax6 from binding the consensus paired domain recognition sequence. We hypothesize that the Pax6 autoregulatory loop is targeted for repression by the TGFβ/Smad pathway, and conclude that this involves diminished paired domain DNA-binding function resulting from a ligand-dependant interaction between Pax6 and Smad3.

DNA Recognition by the Brinker Repressor – An Extreme Case of Coupling Between Binding and Folding

The Brinker (Brk) nuclear repressor is a major element of the Drosophila Decapentaplegic morphogen signaling pathway. Its N-terminal part has weak homology to the Antennapedia homeodomain and binds to GC-rich DNA sequences. We have investigated the conformation and dynamics of the N-terminal 101 amino acid residues of Brk in the absence and in the presence of cognate DNA by solution NMR spectroscopy. In the absence of DNA, Brk is unfolded and highly flexible throughout the entire backbone. Addition of cognate DNA induces the formation of a well-folded structure for residues R46 to R95. This structure consists of four helices forming a helix-turn-helix motif that differs from homeodomains, but has similarities to the Tc3 transposase, the Pax-6 Paired domain, and the human centromere-binding protein. The GC-rich DNA recognition can be explained by specific major groove hydrogen bonds from the N-terminal end of helix α3. The transition from a highly flexible, completely unfolded conformation in the absence of DNA to a well-formed structure in the complex presents a very extreme case of the “coupling of binding and folding” phenomenon.

Structure of the N-terminal fragment of topoisomerase V reveals a new family of topoisomerases

Topoisomerases are involved in controlling and maintaining the topology of DNA and are present in all kingdoms of life. Unlike all other types of topoisomerases, similar type IB enzymes have only been identified in bacteria and eukarya. The only putative type IB topoisomerase in archaea is represented by Methanopyrus kandleri topoisomerase V. Despite several common functional characteristics, topoisomerase V shows no sequence similarity to other members of the same type. The structure of the 61 kDa N-terminal fragment of topoisomerase V reveals no structural similarity to other topoisomerases. Furthermore, the structure of the active site region is different, suggesting no conservation in the cleavage and religation mechanism. Additionally, the active site is buried, indicating the need of a conformational change for activity. The presence of a topoisomerase in archaea with a unique structure suggests the evolution of a separate mechanism to alter DNA.

Crystallization and preliminary X-ray analysis of the Pax6 paired domain bound to thePax6gene enhancer

Pax6 is a member of the Pax family of transcription factors and is essential for eye development. Pax6 has two DNA-binding domains: the paired domain and the homeodomain. The Pax6 paired domain is involved in Pax6 gene autoregulation by binding to its enhancer. In this study, crystallization and preliminary X-ray diffraction analysis of the mammalian Pax6 paired domain in complex with the Pax6 gene enhancer was attempted. The Pax6 paired domain complexed with an optimized 25 bp DNA fragment was crystallized by the hanging-drop vapour-diffusion method. The crystal diffracted synchrotron radiation to 3.0/3.7 A resolution and belongs to the monoclinic space group P2(1), with unit-cell parameters a = 62.21, b = 70.69, c = 176.03 A, beta = 90.54 degrees. Diffraction data were collected to 3.7 A resolution.