Patterns Of Psychiatric Comorbidity Research Articles

Differences in psychiatric comorbidity patterns in patients diagnosed with chronic stress-induced exhaustion disorder and depression – A cohort study in the total population of Region Stockholm

The high prevalence of stress-related disorders and depression underscores the urgent need to unravel their impact on individual well-being. This study aim to investigate common psychiatric and stress-related diagnoses, along with postviral fatigue, in individuals with prior stress-induced exhaustion disorder (SED) and prior depression compared to those without prior SED or depression, and to study whether the psychiatric comorbidity patterns differ.The study includes individuals in Region Stockholm who, in 2011, did not have a diagnosis of SED or depression. ICD-10 diagnosis of SED, depression, or both, recorded in 2012–2013, were compared to individuals without prior SED or depression in a cohort (n = 1,362,886), aged 18 to 65. Odds ratios (OR) with 99 % confidence intervals, adjusted for age and neighborhood socioeconomic status, were calculated for psychiatric disorders and post-viral fatigue in 2014–2022.Patients with prior SED showed associations primarily with stress related diagnoses, including acute stress reaction, reaction to severe stress, as well as post-COVID-19 and post-viral fatigue syndrome. These ORs were all larger for SED than depression. Depression was primarily associated with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), alcohol related and substance use disorders, schizophrenia, schizotypal disorders, delusional disorders, manic episode, bipolar affective disorder, persistent mood disorder, neurotic disorder, borderline personality disorder, autistic disorder, Asperger's syndrome, attention -deficit hyperactivity disorder, attention-deficit disorders ADHD/ADD), and suicide attempt. These ORs were all higher for depression, although autistic disorders, ADHD/ADD and PTSD were also highly associated with prior SED (OR > 3.5).The divergent psychiatric comorbidity patterns suggest different underlying mechanisms and clinical prognosis.

Characteristics Associated With Serious Self-Harm Events in Children and Adolescents.

To identify patterns of psychiatric comorbidity among children and adolescents with a serious self-harm event. We studied children aged 5 to 18 years hospitalized with a neuropsychiatric event at 2 children's hospitals from April 2016 to March 2020. We used Bayesian profile regression to identify distinct clinical profiles of risk for self-harm events from 32 covariates: age, sex, and 30 mental health diagnostic groups. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% credible intervals (CIs) were calculated compared with a reference profile with the overall baseline risk of the cohort. We included 1098 children hospitalized with a neuropsychiatric event (median age 14 years [interquartile range (IQR) 11-16]). Of these, 406 (37%) were diagnosed with a self-harm event. We identified 4 distinct profiles with varying risk for a self-harm diagnosis. The low-risk profile (median 0.035 [IQR 0.029-0.041]; OR 0.08, 95% CI 0.04-0.15) was composed primarily of children aged 5 to 9 years without a previous psychiatric diagnosis. The moderate-risk profile (median 0.30 [IQR 0.27-0.33]; reference profile) included psychiatric diagnoses without depressive disorders. Older female adolescents with a combination of anxiety, depression, substance, and trauma disorders characterized the high-risk profile (median 0.69 [IQR 0.67-0.70]; OR 5.09, 95% CI 3.11-8.38). Younger males with mood and developmental disorders represented the very high-risk profile (median 0.76 [IQR 0.73-0.79]; OR 7.21, 95% CI 3.69-15.20). We describe 4 separate profiles of psychiatric comorbidity that can help identify children at elevated risk for a self-harm event and subsequent opportunities for intervention.

Agitation in Cognitive Disorders: Use of the National Alzheimer’s Coordinating Center Uniform Data Set (NACC‐UDS) to Evaluate the International Psychogeriatric Association Definition.

AbstractBackgroundThe consensus‐based definition of agitation by the International Psychogeriatric Association (IPA) has not been evaluated in community‐based samples who are not preselected for behavioral disturbances. Here we use a well‐characterized cohort of community‐dwelling older individuals with cognitive impairment to assess the IPA criteria associated with agitation to validate the construction of this diagnostic entityMethodWe used the National Alzheimer Coordinating Center Unified Data Set (NACC‐UDS) to select a cognitively impaired cohort across etiological diagnoses, excluding those with a primary psychiatric etiology (IPA criteria A). We used this dataset to evaluate the IPA consensus‐based provisional definition of agitation in cognitive impairment. We used clinician diagnosis of agitation as a gold standard in those with MCI and dementia and the Neuropsychiatric Inventory–Questionnaire (NPI‐Q) algorithm to define agitation symptoms (IPA Criteria B); Standardized assessments of function (including Functional Assessment Scale and CDR Sum of Boxes) were used to assess excess social/functional disability (IPA Criteria C). We examined patterns of psychiatric comorbidities to determine if they were consistent with IPA criteria (IPA Criteria D).ResultWe identified a cognitively impaired cohort (N = 19,424), across multiple etiologies (AD = 73.7%, FTLD = 9.7%, LBD = 6.8% and vascular brain injury = 3.5%). Mean (SD) age was 72.7 (10.1) years, 77.0% were non‐Hispanic White, 11.1% non‐Hispanic Black, 8.3% Hispanic, with an average of 14.7(3.7) years of education. Mean (SD) MMSE = 22.0(6.4), FAQ = 12.7(9.5), and GDS = 2.8(2.8). Clinician judgement of agitation was present in 15.7% of the sample. Those with agitation were younger, more likely to be male, had slightly lower educational levels and were more likely to be from under‐represented groups. 38.6% had agitation by NPI algorithm, with high agreement with clinician judgement. More than 84% of those with clinician judgment of agitation and 74% of those meeting the NPI algorithm demonstrated excess social/functional disability. Psychiatric comorbidities were present in 38% of the sample without evidence of agitation, and were higher in those with agitation (56% to 82%, depending on agitation definition).ConclusionAgitation ranges between 15 and 38% in those with cognitive impairment. The pattern of excess disability and presence of comorbid psychiatric symptoms in this well characterized dataset is consistent with IPA published criteria.

Psychiatric comorbidity among patients attending an addiction treatment center in Morocco

IntroductionThe comorbidity between psychiatric disorders and substance use disorders is more and more common in daily clinical practice. However, only few studies have adressed this subject in north african patients.ObjectivesThe main objective of our study was the estimation of the prevalence and patterns of psychiatric co-morbidities in substance users seeking care.MethodsOur work consisted of a cross-sectional study of a sample of patients attending outpatient substance use treatment at the addiction center in Oujda, Morocco. A hetero-questionnaire was used to collect sociodemographic data and patient history, DSM-IV criteria to assess substance abuse and dependence, and the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview [MINI] to assess psychiatric comorbidities.ResultsOur study involved 100 patients, with a male predominance (89% of users). The main substances used in the last 12 months were tobacco (78%), followed by cannabis (74%), alcohol (50%), and benzodiazepines (44%). Psychiatric comorbidity was identified in 71% of the users, 51% of whom had a depressive disorder, 35% an anxiety disorder and 10% a gambling disorder. The dependence on the substance that initially motivated the consultation was higher in patients with psychiatric comorbidity (p=0.033). The post-traumatic stress disorder was significantly associated with the presence of alcohol dependence (p=0.028). The presence of benzodiazepine dependence (p=0.025) and abuse of cocaine (p=0.028) and Ecstasy (p=0.000) were significantly associated with suicide risk.ConclusionsOur study found a high prevalence of psychiatric comorbidities among substance users seeking treatment, this should prompt clinicians to pay particular attention to this issue in order to adapt and improve their management.DisclosureNo significant relationships.

Agitation in Cognitive Disorders: Use of the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center Uniform Data Set (NACC-UDS) to Evaluate International Psychogeriatric Association Definition

ObjectiveConsensus-based definition of agitation by the International Psychogeriatric Association (IPA) has not been evaluated in community-based samples who are not preselected for behavioral disturbances. Here, we use a well-characterized cohort of community-dwelling older adults with cognitive impairment to assess the IPA criteria associated with agitation to evaluate the construction of this diagnostic entity. MethodsWe used the National Alzheimer Coordinating Center Unified Data Set (NACC-UDS) to construct the IPA consensus-based provisional definition of agitation in cognitive impairment (N = 19,424). We used clinician diagnosis of agitation as a gold standard in those with mild cognitive impairment and dementia and used the Neuropsychiatric Inventory-Questionnaire to define agitation symptoms and standardized assessments of function (including the Functional Assessment Scale and Clinical Dementia Rating Scale Sum of Boxes) to assess “excess disability.” We also examined patterns of psychiatric comorbidities to determine if they were consistent with IPA criteria. ResultsThere was agreement between the selected NPI measure of agitation and clinician judgment (sensitivity = 0.79, specificity = 0.69, Cohen's Kappa = 0.304). More than 84% of those with clinician judgment of agitation and 74% of those meeting the scale-based definition of agitation demonstrated excess social/functional disability. Comorbid psychiatric symptoms were present in 38% of the sample without agitation and higher in those with agitation by either definition. ConclusionAgitation ranges between 15% and 48% in those with cognitive impairment. The pattern of level of excess disability and the presence of comorbid psychiatric symptoms is consistent with the profile of published definitions.

Using density of antecedent events and trajectory path analysis to investigate family-correlated patterns of onset of bipolar I disorder: a comparison of cohorts from Europe and USA

BackgroundMajor contributors to the global burden of bipolar disorders (BD) are the early age at onset (AAO) and the co-occurrence of non-mood disorders before and after the onset of BD. Using data from two independent cohorts from Europe and the USA, we investigated whether the trajectories of BD-I onset and patterns of psychiatric comorbidities differed in (a) individuals with or without a family history (FH) of BD, or (b) probands and parents who both had BD-I.MethodsFirst, we estimated cumulative probabilities and AAO of comorbid mental disorders in familial and non-familial cases of BD-I (Europe, n = 573), and sex-matched proband-parent pairs of BD-I cases (USA, n = 194). Then we used time to onset analyses to compare overall AAO of BD-I and AAO according to onset polarity. Next, we examined associations between AAO and polarity of onset of BD-I according to individual experiences of comorbidities. This included analysis of the density of antecedent events (defined as the number of antecedent comorbidities per year of exposure to mental illness per individual) and time trend analysis of trajectory paths plotted for the subgroups included in each cohort (using R2 goodness of fit analysis).ResultsEarlier AAO of BD-I was found in FH versus non-FH cases (log rank test = 7.63; p = 0.006) and in probands versus parents with BD-I (log rank test = 15.31; p = 0.001). In the European cohort, AAO of BD-I was significantly associated with factors such as: FH of BD (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.60), earlier AAO of first non-mood disorder (HR: 0.93) and greater number of comorbidities (HR: 0.74). In the USA cohort, probands with BD-I had an earlier AAO for depressive and manic episodes and AAO was also associated with e.g., number of comorbidities (HR: 0.65) and year of birth (HR: 2.44). Trajectory path analysis indicated significant differences in density of antecedents between subgroups within each cohort. However, the time trend R2 analysis was significantly different for the European cohort only.ConclusionsEstimating density of antecedent events and comparing trajectory plots for different BD subgroups are informative adjuncts to established statistical approaches and may offer additional insights that enhance understanding of the evolution of BD-I.

Prevalence of mood, panic and eating disorders in obese patients referred to bariatric surgery: patterns of comorbidity and relationship with body mass index

PurposeWe aimed at investigating the lifetime prevalence of mood, eating and panic disorders in a large sample of obese patients referred to bariatric surgery. We also explored the patterns of psychiatric comorbidity and their relationship with Body Mass Index (BMI).MethodsThe sample was composed of patients consecutively referred for pre-surgical evaluation to the Obesity Center of Pisa University Hospital between January 2004 and November 2016. Clinical charts were retrieved and examined to obtain sociodemographic information, anthropometric variables and lifetime psychiatric diagnoses according to DSM-IV criteria.ResultsA total of 871 patients were included in the study; 72% were females, and most patients had BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2 (81%). Overall, 55% of the patients were diagnosed with at least one lifetime psychiatric disorder. Binge eating disorder (27.6%), major depressive disorder (16%), bipolar disorder type 2 (15.5%), and panic disorder (16%) were the most common psychiatric diagnoses. Mood disorders showed associations with panic disorder (OR = 2.75, 95% CI = 1.90–3.99, χ2 = 41.85, p = 0.000) and eating disorders (OR = 2.17, 95% CI 1.64–2.88, χ2 = 55.54, p = 0.000). BMI was lower in patients with major depressive disorder (44.9 ± 7.89) than in subjects without mood disorders (46.75 ± 7.99, padj = 0.017).ConclusionBariatric patients show high rates of psychiatric disorders, especially binge eating and mood disorders. Longitudinal studies are needed to explore the possible influence of such comorbidities on the long-term outcome after bariatric surgery.Level of evidenceV, cross sectional descriptive study.

Psychiatric Comorbidity Among Adolescents with Substance Use Disorder

Substance Use Disorder (SUD) in adolescents, is a condition in which the use of one or more substances leads to clinically significant impairment or distress. It is a significant public health problem globally with a higher burden in low and middle-income countries. To find out the frequency and pattern of psychiatric comorbidity among the adolescents with Substance Use Disorder. This descriptive and observational study was conducted in the Department of Psychiatry, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU), Dhaka, Bangladesh from March 2016 to September 2018. The present study aimed at assessing the presence of comorbid psychiatric disorders among adolescents with Substance Use Disorder (SUD) included a total of 70 adolescents. Over half (60%) of the respondents were <15 years old, and 40% of the respondents were >15 years age. The mean age of the respondents was 13.2 ± 2.1 years, and the range was 11-17 years. About 50% of the adolescents interviewed had Tobacco Use Disorder (51.4%), followed by Cannabis Use Disorder (47.1%). Among the respondents, 22.8% had no psychiatric illness. The overall psychiatric disorders among adolescents were 77.1% (54 out of 70). Most of the patients (45.7%) had more than one psychiatric disorder diagnosed. Regarding the specific disorder diagnosed Conduct Disorder was 31.4% and different socio-demographic features. Based on the findings of the study, it can be concluded that adolescents with SUD have a high rate of other comorbid psychiatric disorders.

Psychiatric Disorders and Future Violent Arrests: A Prospective Study Among Detained Girls

This study scrutinizes if detained girls with psychiatric disorders were at risk for future violent arrests during adolescence. A structured diagnostic interview was performed to determine the presence of various psychiatric disorders in 313 detained girls. Official juvenile arrest records were collected. With three exceptions that are in need of replication, psychiatric disorders (e.g., post-traumatic stress disorder, subtypes of conduct disorder), psychiatric disorder categories (e.g., anxiety disorders), and psychiatric comorbidity patterns were not prospectively related to future violent arrests. Our findings suggest that detained girls with psychiatric disorders should not be considered more dangerous than their counterparts without disorders, at least not during adolescence.

Current Pattern of Psychiatric Comorbidity and Psychotropic Drug Prescription in Child and Adolescent Patients.

Background: In recent years, patterns of the use of psychotropic drugs vary with increasing rates of psychiatric presentation and diagnosis in children and adolescents. Purpose: In this study, we aimed to investigate distributions of current psychiatric symptoms and diagnosis, patterns of the use of psychotropic drugs, and differences according to age and gender in patients presented to a child and adolescent outpatient clinic. Methods: All patients aged between 0 and 18 years presenting to a child and adolescent psychiatry outpatient clinic between November 1, 2017 and November 1, 2018 were included in the study. Files of all patients were examined in detail, and patients’ demographic characteristics, symptoms, psychiatric diagnoses established according to the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5), psychotropic drugs initiated, and side effect profiles were recorded. Psychiatric symptoms and diagnostic features of the patients were determined, and the differences were investigated according to gender. Clinical characteristics were compared between diagnosed and undiagnosed patients, and between patients with and without drug initiation. Results: Of the 2066 patients, 1298 (62.8%) were male and the mean age was 10.14 ± 4.42 years. The most common symptoms were hyperactivity (23.8%) and inattention (21.6%) in males, inattention (15.1%) and irritability (14.2%) in females, and 79% of the patients received one or more psychiatric diagnoses. The most common psychiatric diagnoses in both genders were attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), specific learning disorder (SLD), and conduct disorder, respectively. Of the patients who received a psychiatric diagnosis, 61.8% were using psychotropic drugs, with the majority of them (71.3%) receiving monotherapy. The most frequently initiated drugs included psychostimulants, antipsychotics, and antidepressants, with 28.7% of the drug user patients receiving multiple drug therapy. Conclusion: Our study indicates that rate of presentation to child and adolescent psychiatry outpatient clinics is increasing, and rates of diagnosis and initiation of psychiatry drugs are high among the presented children. The prevalence of ADHD shows an increase in males and females in our country, and psychiatric polypharmacy has reached significant rates.

Patterns of Psychiatric Comorbidity and Genetic Correlations Provide New Insights Into Differences Between Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder and Autism Spectrum Disorder

BackgroundAttention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and autism spectrum disorder (ASD) share common genetic factors but seem to have specific patterns of psychiatric comorbidities. There are few systematic studies on adults; therefore, we compared psychiatric comorbidities in adults with these two neurodevelopmental disorders using population-based data and analyzed their genetic correlations to evaluate underlying factors. MethodsUsing data from Norwegian registries, we assessed patterns of psychiatric disorders in adults with ADHD (n = 38,636; 2.3%), ASD (n = 7528; 0.4%), and both diagnoses (n = 1467; 0.1%) compared with the remaining adult population (n = 1,653,575). We calculated their prevalence ratios (PRs) and differences using Poisson regression, also examining sex-specific relations. Genetic correlations (rg) among ADHD, ASD, and the examined psychiatric disorders were calculated by linkage disequilibrium score regression, exploiting summary statistics from relevant genome-wide association studies. ResultsFor all psychiatric comorbidities, PRs differed between ADHD and ASD. Associations were strongest in individuals with ADHD and ADHD+ASD for most comorbidities, in both men and women. The relative prevalence increase of substance use disorder was three times larger in ADHD than in ASD (PRADHD, 6.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 6.1–6.4; PRASD, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.7–2.2; p < .001); however, the opposite was true for schizophrenia (PRASD, 13.9; 95% CI, 12.7–15.2; PRADHD, 4.4; 95% CI, 4.1–4.7; p < .001). Genetic correlations supported these patterns but were significantly different between ADHD and ASD only for the substance use disorder proxies and personality traits (p < .006 for all). ConclusionsAdults with ADHD, ASD, or both ADHD and ASD have specific patterns of psychiatric comorbidities. This may partly be explained by differences in underlying genetic factors.

Comorbidity Patterns Among Patients With Opioid Use Disorder and Problem Gambling: ADHD Status Predicts Class Membership

Objective: Psychiatric comorbidities are highly prevalent among individuals affected by substance use disorders and those with non-substance-related addictive disorders such as gambling disorder. More recently, the frequent co-occurrence of substance use disorders and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) has received particular attention. The aim of our study was to identify patterns of psychiatric comorbidity and to examine associations between patient group and ADHD status with class membership. Methods: Participants were patients with opioid use disorder enrolled in opioid maintenance treatment (OMT), either recruited from the community (n = 142; M age = 35.8 years; 38.7% female) or prison (n = 133; M age = 35.7 years; 21.8% female), and patients undergoing treatment for problem gambling (PrG; n = 80; M age = 43.1 years; 20% female). To enable direct comparisons, the following instruments were applied: Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview, Adult ADHD self-report scale, Wender Utah Rating Scale, and European Addiction Severity Index. We used a latent class analysis (LCA) to identify psychiatric comorbidity patterns and a multinomial logistic regression to examine associations between patient group, ADHD status, age, and gender with class membership. Results: The LCA resulted in a three-class solution: (1) a class of individuals with a relatively low probability of current psychiatric comorbidities, except for a high probability of substance use disorders; (2) a class with markedly increased probabilities of current and recurrent psychiatric comorbidities, especially for major depression; and (3) a class with very low probabilities of psychiatric comorbidities, except for moderate probabilities of substance use disorders and antisocial personality disorder. Both OMT patients recruited from the community and those in prison were less likely than PrG patients to be assigned to the most burdened class with respect to psychiatric comorbidity (class 2). Further, both individuals with ADHD in childhood and those with adult ADHD were more likely members of class 2. Conclusions: PrG patients seem to be at an even higher risk for psychiatric comorbidities compared to OMT patients. Raising awareness among practitioners for the high prevalence of psychiatric comorbidities among patients with gambling disorder and individuals with ADHD is crucial to initiate adequate treatment and to improve response.

Conduct disorder in adolescent females: current state of research and study design of the FemNAT-CD consortium

Conduct disorder (CD) is a common and highly impairing psychiatric disorder of childhood and adolescence that frequently leads to poor physical and mental health outcomes in adulthood. The prevalence of CD is substantially higher in males than females, and partly due to this, most research on this condition has used all-male or predominantly male samples. Although the number of females exhibiting CD has increased in recent decades, the majority of studies on neurobiological measures, neurocognitive phenotypes, and treatments for CD have focused on male subjects only, despite strong evidence for sex differences in the aetiology and neurobiology of CD. Here, we selectively review the existing literature on CD and related phenotypes in females, focusing in particular on sex differences in CD symptoms, patterns of psychiatric comorbidity, and callous-unemotional personality traits. We also consider studies investigating the neurobiology of CD in females, with a focus on studies using genetic, structural and functional neuroimaging, psychophysiological, and neuroendocrinological methods. We end the article by providing an overview of the study design of the FemNAT-CD consortium, an interdisciplinary, multi-level and multi-site study that explicitly focuses on CD in females, but which is also investigating sex differences in the causes, developmental course, and neurobiological correlates of CD.

Characterizing psychiatric comorbidity in children with autism spectrum disorder receiving publicly funded mental health services.

Publicly funded mental health programs play a significant role in serving children with autism spectrum disorder. Understanding patterns of psychiatric comorbidity for this population within mental health settings is important to implement appropriately tailored interventions. This study (1) describes patterns of psychiatric comorbidity in children with autism spectrum disorder who present to mental health services with challenging behaviors and (2) identifies child characteristics associated with comorbid conditions. Data are drawn from baseline assessments from 201 children with autism spectrum disorder who participated in a community effectiveness trial across 29 publicly funded mental health programs. Non-autism spectrum disorder diagnoses were assessed using an adapted Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview, parent version. Approximately 92% of children met criteria for at least one non-autism spectrum disorder diagnosis (78% attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, 58% oppositional defiant disorder, 56% anxiety, 30% mood). Logistic regression indicated that child gender and clinical characteristics were differentially associated with meeting criteria for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, oppositional defiant disorder, an anxiety, or a mood disorder. Exploratory analyses supported a link between challenging behaviors and mood disorder symptoms and revealed high prevalence of these symptoms in this autism spectrum disorder population. Findings provide direction for tailoring intervention to address a broad range of clinical issues for youth with autism spectrum disorder served in mental health settings.

Psychiatric disorders among people with cancer in low- and lower-middle-income countries: study protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

IntroductionCancer is a rapidly growing public health problem in low- and lower-middle-income countries (LLMICs). There is evidence from upper-income countries that comorbid mental illness is common and can adversely impact...

Lithium and It’s Association with Physical Disorders: Focus on theKidney

The aim of this cross-sectional study was to identify if there was a specific difference between patients with functional dystonia (DysF) and those with adult-onset, isolated idiopathic (“primary”) dystonia (DysP) in terms of psychiatric disorders, psychological stressor, dissociation correlates, and personality traits.Thirty-nine clinically definite DysF and 30 DysP patients matched by age, gender and dystonia distribution underwent psychiatric interview based on DSM-5 criteria and additional testings for global cognitive and psychiatric functions (Mini-Mental State Examination, Hamilton Depression and Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale, Apathy Scale, Somatoform Dissociation Questionnaire-20, Dissociative Experiences Scale II, and the five-dimensional Revised Neuroticism-Extroversion-Openness Personality Inventory).Almost half of our DysF patients had prior psychiatric treatment, which was significantly more frequent when compared to DysP. Patients with DysF in comparison to DysP also had considerably more frequent preceding stress, higher apathy, dissociative and somatoform scores, as well as significantly higher rate of la belle indifférence sign. This sign, stress before dystonia and prior psychiatric disorder independently predicted having DysF. Some of psychiatric disorders (i.e. substance-related disorders, schizophrenia, adjustment disorder, borderline personality disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, psychotic depression, delusional disorder) were exclusively present among DysF patients. DysF compared to DysP patients had lower scores for both extroversion and openness to experiences.Our data found different pattern of psychiatric comorbidity and personality traits between DysF and DysP patients, including a higher prevalence of psychological stressor and dissociative correlates, indicating at least a partial role of psychological mechanisms in the pathogenesis of DysF.

Is psychotherapy for functional somatic syndromes harmful to patients? A mixed method study on negative effects

The aim of this cross-sectional study was to identify if there was a specific difference between patients with functional dystonia (DysF) and those with adult-onset, isolated idiopathic (“primary”) dystonia (DysP) in terms of psychiatric disorders, psychological stressor, dissociation correlates, and personality traits.Thirty-nine clinically definite DysF and 30 DysP patients matched by age, gender and dystonia distribution underwent psychiatric interview based on DSM-5 criteria and additional testings for global cognitive and psychiatric functions (Mini-Mental State Examination, Hamilton Depression and Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale, Apathy Scale, Somatoform Dissociation Questionnaire-20, Dissociative Experiences Scale II, and the five-dimensional Revised Neuroticism-Extroversion-Openness Personality Inventory).Almost half of our DysF patients had prior psychiatric treatment, which was significantly more frequent when compared to DysP. Patients with DysF in comparison to DysP also had considerably more frequent preceding stress, higher apathy, dissociative and somatoform scores, as well as significantly higher rate of la belle indifférence sign. This sign, stress before dystonia and prior psychiatric disorder independently predicted having DysF. Some of psychiatric disorders (i.e. substance-related disorders, schizophrenia, adjustment disorder, borderline personality disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, psychotic depression, delusional disorder) were exclusively present among DysF patients. DysF compared to DysP patients had lower scores for both extroversion and openness to experiences.Our data found different pattern of psychiatric comorbidity and personality traits between DysF and DysP patients, including a higher prevalence of psychological stressor and dissociative correlates, indicating at least a partial role of psychological mechanisms in the pathogenesis of DysF.

Characterizing end-of-life decision-making in Japanese female nurses by marital status

The aim of this cross-sectional study was to identify if there was a specific difference between patients with functional dystonia (DysF) and those with adult-onset, isolated idiopathic (“primary”) dystonia (DysP) in terms of psychiatric disorders, psychological stressor, dissociation correlates, and personality traits.Thirty-nine clinically definite DysF and 30 DysP patients matched by age, gender and dystonia distribution underwent psychiatric interview based on DSM-5 criteria and additional testings for global cognitive and psychiatric functions (Mini-Mental State Examination, Hamilton Depression and Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale, Apathy Scale, Somatoform Dissociation Questionnaire-20, Dissociative Experiences Scale II, and the five-dimensional Revised Neuroticism-Extroversion-Openness Personality Inventory).Almost half of our DysF patients had prior psychiatric treatment, which was significantly more frequent when compared to DysP. Patients with DysF in comparison to DysP also had considerably more frequent preceding stress, higher apathy, dissociative and somatoform scores, as well as significantly higher rate of la belle indifférence sign. This sign, stress before dystonia and prior psychiatric disorder independently predicted having DysF. Some of psychiatric disorders (i.e. substance-related disorders, schizophrenia, adjustment disorder, borderline personality disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, psychotic depression, delusional disorder) were exclusively present among DysF patients. DysF compared to DysP patients had lower scores for both extroversion and openness to experiences.Our data found different pattern of psychiatric comorbidity and personality traits between DysF and DysP patients, including a higher prevalence of psychological stressor and dissociative correlates, indicating at least a partial role of psychological mechanisms in the pathogenesis of DysF.

High- and low-dose Acceptance and Commitment group Therapy (ACT-G) versus enhanced care for patients with severe functional somatic syndromes (STreSS-4): Preliminary results from a randomizedcontrolled trial

The aim of this cross-sectional study was to identify if there was a specific difference between patients with functional dystonia (DysF) and those with adult-onset, isolated idiopathic (“primary”) dystonia (DysP) in terms of psychiatric disorders, psychological stressor, dissociation correlates, and personality traits.Thirty-nine clinically definite DysF and 30 DysP patients matched by age, gender and dystonia distribution underwent psychiatric interview based on DSM-5 criteria and additional testings for global cognitive and psychiatric functions (Mini-Mental State Examination, Hamilton Depression and Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale, Apathy Scale, Somatoform Dissociation Questionnaire-20, Dissociative Experiences Scale II, and the five-dimensional Revised Neuroticism-Extroversion-Openness Personality Inventory).Almost half of our DysF patients had prior psychiatric treatment, which was significantly more frequent when compared to DysP. Patients with DysF in comparison to DysP also had considerably more frequent preceding stress, higher apathy, dissociative and somatoform scores, as well as significantly higher rate of la belle indifférence sign. This sign, stress before dystonia and prior psychiatric disorder independently predicted having DysF. Some of psychiatric disorders (i.e. substance-related disorders, schizophrenia, adjustment disorder, borderline personality disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, psychotic depression, delusional disorder) were exclusively present among DysF patients. DysF compared to DysP patients had lower scores for both extroversion and openness to experiences.Our data found different pattern of psychiatric comorbidity and personality traits between DysF and DysP patients, including a higher prevalence of psychological stressor and dissociative correlates, indicating at least a partial role of psychological mechanisms in the pathogenesis of DysF.

Predictors of pain perception and quality of life in a 1-year follow-up of patients with Chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CPPS)

The aim of this cross-sectional study was to identify if there was a specific difference between patients with functional dystonia (DysF) and those with adult-onset, isolated idiopathic (“primary”) dystonia (DysP) in terms of psychiatric disorders, psychological stressor, dissociation correlates, and personality traits.Thirty-nine clinically definite DysF and 30 DysP patients matched by age, gender and dystonia distribution underwent psychiatric interview based on DSM-5 criteria and additional testings for global cognitive and psychiatric functions (Mini-Mental State Examination, Hamilton Depression and Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale, Apathy Scale, Somatoform Dissociation Questionnaire-20, Dissociative Experiences Scale II, and the five-dimensional Revised Neuroticism-Extroversion-Openness Personality Inventory).Almost half of our DysF patients had prior psychiatric treatment, which was significantly more frequent when compared to DysP. Patients with DysF in comparison to DysP also had considerably more frequent preceding stress, higher apathy, dissociative and somatoform scores, as well as significantly higher rate of la belle indifférence sign. This sign, stress before dystonia and prior psychiatric disorder independently predicted having DysF. Some of psychiatric disorders (i.e. substance-related disorders, schizophrenia, adjustment disorder, borderline personality disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, psychotic depression, delusional disorder) were exclusively present among DysF patients. DysF compared to DysP patients had lower scores for both extroversion and openness to experiences.Our data found different pattern of psychiatric comorbidity and personality traits between DysF and DysP patients, including a higher prevalence of psychological stressor and dissociative correlates, indicating at least a partial role of psychological mechanisms in the pathogenesis of DysF.