Patients Undergoing Spine Surgery Research Articles

Does the Application of Topical Vancomycin Reduce Surgical Site Infections in Spine Surgery? A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Surgical site infections (SSIs) represent a major challenge in spine surgery, leading to severe morbidity, mortality, and increased costs. The local application of antibiotics, particularly vancomycin, has emerged as a potential strategy. Individual randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have disagreed about the efficacy of topical vancomycin in preventing SSIs after spine surgery, and so a meta-analysis that pools data from those RCTs might be helpful to inform clinicians' decisions on the topic. This meta-analysis of RCTs asked: Does intrawound topical vancomycin reduce the risk of (1) SSIs, (2) deep SSIs, and (3) superficial SSIs in patients undergoing spine surgery? PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar (pages 1-20) were searched up through March 13, 2024 (search performed on March 13, 2024). Inclusion criteria consisted of English or non-English-language RCTs comparing the implementation of topical vancomycin in spine surgery to its nonuse and assessing its efficacy in preventing SSI, while exclusion criteria consisted of nonrandomized comparative studies, single-arm noncomparative studies, comparative studies based on national databases or from the same center as other included studies, studies posted to preprint servers, studies reporting incomplete/nonrelevant outcomes, and studies adding another SSI preventive measure. The studies were assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Heterogeneity was evaluated by Q tests and I2 statistics. We used a random-effects model when considerable heterogeneity was observed (all SSIs, deep SSIs); otherwise, a fixed-effects model was used (all SSIs subanalysis, superficial SSIs). Furthermore, the fragility index was calculated for each of the assessed outcomes when there was no difference between the two groups to assess how many patients were needed to experience the outcomes for a difference to become present. The studied outcomes were the risks of SSIs, deep SSIs, and superficial SSIs. Deep SSIs were defined by the included trials as SSIs underneath the fascia, otherwise they were considered superficial. Six RCTs representing a total of 2140 patients were included, with 1053 patients in the vancomycin group and 1087 in the control group. Using an alpha of 0.05, our meta-analysis had 80% power to detect a risk difference of 1.5% for the primary outcome between patients who did and did not receive vancomycin. The age of the patients in the vancomycin group ranged from 37 to 52 years, while the age in the control group ranged from 34 to 52 years. The surgical procedures consisted of both instrumented and noninstrumented spinal procedures. Overall, the risk of bias in the included studies was either low or unclear, with none of the studies having a high risk of bias in any of the assessed categories (selection bias, performance bias, detection bias, attrition bias, and reporting bias). We found no difference in the risk of SSI between the vancomycin and control groups (3.0% [32 of 1053] versus 3.9% [42 of 1087], relative risk 0.74 [95% CI 0.35 to 1.57]; p = 0.43). Ten additional patients (4.8% infection risk) in the control group would need to experience an SSI for a difference to be observed between the two groups. We found no difference in the risk of deep SSI between the vancomycin and control groups (1.8% [15 of 812] versus 2.7% [23 of 860], relative risk 0.69 [95% CI 0.24 to 2.00]; p = 0.50). Seven additional patients (3.5% infection risk) in the control group would need to experience a deep SSI for a difference to be observed between the two groups. We found no difference in the risk of superficial SSI between the vancomycin and control groups (1.0% [6 of 620] versus 1.4% [9 of 662], relative risk 0.68 [95% CI 0.25 to 1.89]; p = 0.46). Seven additional patients (2.4% infection risk) in the control group would need to experience a superficial SSI for a difference to be observed between the two groups. This meta-analysis of randomized trials examining use of topical vancomycin in spine surgery failed to show efficacy in reducing infection, and thus we do not recommend routine use of topical vancomycin for this indication. Future large-scale trials would be needed if surgeons believe that between-group differences smaller than those for which we were powered here (this meta-analysis had 80% power to detect a between-group difference of 1.5% in infection risk) are clinically important, and large database surveys may be informative in terms of assessing for postoperative adverse events associated with the use of vancomycin powder. Level I, therapeutic study.

Impact of Targeted Systemic Therapy and Radiotherapy on Patients Undergoing Spine Surgery for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.

In patients undergoing spine surgery for renal cell carcinoma (RCC), we sought to: (1) describe patterns of postoperative targeted systemic therapy and radiotherapy (RT), (2) compare perioperative outcomes among those treated with targeted systemic therapy to those without, and (3) evaluate the impact of targeted systemic therapy and/or RT on overall survival (OS) and local recurrence (LR). A single-institution, retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing spine surgery for metastatic RCC from 2010 to 2021 was undertaken. Treatment groups were RT alone, targeted systemic therapy alone, dual therapy consisting of RT and targeted systemic therapy, and neither therapy. Multivariable Cox regression controlled for age, race, sex, insurance, and preoperative targeted systemic therapy. Forty-nine patients underwent spine surgery for RCC. Postoperatively, 4 patients (8%) received RT alone, 19 (38.8%) targeted systemic therapy alone, 12 (24.5%) dual therapy, and 13 (28.6%) neither. All groups were similar in demographics, preoperative Karnofsky Performance Score (P = 0.372), tumor size (P = 0.413), readmissions (P = 0.884), complications (P = 0.272), Karnofsky Performance Score (P = 0.466), and Modified McCormick Scale (P = 0.980) at last follow-up. Higher 1-year survival was found in dual therapy (83.3%) compared with other therapies. OS was significantly longer in patients with dual therapy compared with other therapies (log-rank; P = 0.010). Multivariate Cox regression (HR = 0.08, 95% CI = 0.02-0.31, P < 0.001) showed longer OS in dual therapy compared with other therapies. Seven patients (14.3%) experienced LR, and a similar time to LR was found between groups (log-rank; P = 0.190). In patients undergoing metastatic spine surgery for RCC, postoperative dual therapy demonstrated significantly higher 1-year survival and OS compared with other therapies. Multidisciplinary management of metastatic RCC is necessary to ensure timely implementation of targeted systemic therapy and RT to improve outcomes.

Effect of desflurane anesthesia on flash visual evoked potential monitoring in patients undergoing spine surgery: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BackgroundFlash visual evoked potentials (FVEPs) are a reliable method for protecting visual function during spine surgery in prone position. However, the popularization and application of FVEPs remain limited due to the unclear influence of various anesthetics on FVEPs. Exploring the effects of anesthetic drugs on FVEP and establishing appropriate anesthesia maintenance methods are particularly important for promoting and applying FVEP. According to the conventional concept, inhaled narcotic drugs significantly affect the success of FVEP monitoring, FVEP extraction, and interpretation. Nonetheless, our previous study demonstrated that sevoflurane-propofol balanced anesthesia was a practicable regimen for FVEPs. Desflurane is widely used in general anesthesia for its rapid recovery properties. As the effect of desflurane on FVEP remains unclear, this trial will investigate the effect of different inhaled concentrations of desflurane anesthesia on amplitude of FVEPs during spine surgery, aiming to identify more feasible anesthesia schemes for the clinical application of FVEP.Methods/ designA total of 70 patients undergoing elective spinal surgery will be enrolled in this prospective, randomized controlled, open-label, patient-assessor-blinded, superiority trial and randomly assigned to the low inhaled concentration of desflurane group (LD group) maintained with desflurane-propofolremifentanil-balanced anesthesia or high inhaled concentration of desflurane group (HD group) maintained with desflurane-remifentanil anesthesia maintenance group at a ratio of 1:1. All patients will be monitored for intraoperative FVEPs, and the baseline will be measured half an hour after induction under total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA). After that, patients will receive 0.5 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) of desflurane combined with propofol and remifentanil for anesthesia maintenance in the LD group, while 0.7–1.0 MAC of desflurane and remifentanil will be maintained in the HD group. The primary outcome is the N75-P100 amplitude 1 h after the induction of anesthesia. We intend to use the dual measure evaluation, dual data entry, and statistical analysis by double trained assessors to ensure the reliability and accuracy of the results.DiscussionThis randomized controlled trial aims to explore the superiority effect of low inhaled concentration of desflurane combined with propofolremifentanil-balanced anesthesia versus high inhaled concentration of desflurane combined with remifentanil anesthesia on amplitude of FVEPs. The study is meant to be published in a peer-reviewed journal and might guide the anesthetic regimen for FVEPs. The conclusion is expected to provide high-quality evidence for the effect of desflurane on FVEPs and aim to explore more feasible anesthesia schemes for the clinical application of FVEPs and visual function protection.Trial registrationThis study was registered on clinicaltrials.gov on July 15, 2022. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05465330.

Telemedicine in Follow-up after Spine Surgery: Need of the Hour.

Purpose There is an acute shortage of neurosurgeons and spine surgeons especially in rural areas of low- and middle-income countries including India. Patients of spine surgery need to travel long distances for follow-up at tertiary care hospitals. This study was done to evaluate role and success rate of telemedicine in follow-up after spine surgery based on patients' diagnosis and demographic features and to identify barriers to successful telemedicine consultations. Materials and Methods All patients undergoing spine surgeries including craniovertebral junction (CVJ) surgeries from January 2021 to June 2022 were included in the study. Success rate of telemedicine was calculated using a simple formula: Success rate of telemedicine = successful telemedicine consultations / total number of telemedicine consultation × 100. Success rate was evaluated with respect to demographic features and underlying disease-related factors. Results Eighty-four patients formed the study group in which a total of 181 video teleconsultations were done. Overall success rate of telemedicine was 82.87%. Higher socioeconomic and educational statuses were related to higher success rates of tele-consultations ( p < 0.05). Difficulty in assessing neurological condition using video call in follow-up cases of CVJ and issues related to Internet communication network leading to inability to video call and share image/videos were major causes of failures. Conclusion Telemedicine may prove an effective option for following up patients undergoing spine surgeries except CVJ, which is likely to improve further with improvements in Internet connectivity.

Letter to the Editor. Preoperative depression among patients undergoing spine surgery.

Letter to the Editor. Preoperative depression among patients undergoing spine surgery.

Prevención de eventos trombóticos en pacientes sometidos a cirugía de artrodesis lumbar por vía posterior: experiencia en nuestro centro. Estudio retrospectivo de casos

There is no generalized consensus regarding perioperative prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism (VTE), either on using or timing it in patients undergoing spine surgery. VTE is a current concern because, even though being an uncommon event, it can cause serious complications. The aim of the present study is to propose guidelines for the prevention of thrombotic events in posterior spinal surgery, either as deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary thromboembolism. If the number of patients getting prophylaxis drugs is reduced a subsequent reduction of the incidence of epidural hematoma can be expected. A number of 235 patients who had undergone posterior spinal arthrodesis in the previous five years were studied. Mechanical thromboprophylaxis measures consisting of compression stockings were applied in all of them. Anticoagulant drugs were also applied whenever risk factors for thrombosis were observed. Early weight-bearing was resumed immediately after surgery. Demographic, clinical, and surgical variables were collected, as well as complications appearing during the follow-up period, that was scheduled at one, two, four, six and twelve months after the surgery. Thrombotic events, if present, were diagnosed by clinical and imaging tests such as ultrasound and CT angiography. From the total 235 patients of this series, one hundred and fifty-three cases met the study inclusion criteria. A total of four thrombotic events appeared, one in the form of deep vein thrombosis and other three in the form of pulmonary thromboembolism. These last patients suffering an embolism died because of it. None of the variables studied had statistical significance for the occurrence of a thrombotic event. All four patients who suffered thrombotic events were receiving anticoagulant drugs, in addition to mechanical compression stockings, because of the presence of risk factors for thrombosis. By applying the fore mentioned protocol, adequate prevention of thromboembolic events was achieved in this study population of patients undergoing posterior spinal surgery.

Abdominal Aortic Calcification is Associated with Degeneration of The Paraspinal Muscles - A Retrospective cross-sectional Study.

Retrospective cohort study. To analyze the relationship of abdominal aortic calcification (AAC) and a reduction in the cross-sectional area (CSA) and the fatty infiltration (FI) of the paravertebral muscles in patients undergoing lumbar fusion surgery. Both AAC and paraspinal muscle degeneration have been shown to be associated with poorer outcomes after surgical treatment of degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine. However, there is a lack of data on the association between AAC and paraspinal muscle changes in patients undergoing spine surgery. We retrospectively analyzed patients undergoing lumbar fusion for degenerative spinal pathologies. Muscular and spinal degeneration were measured on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). AAC was classified on lateral lumbar radiographs. The association of AAC and paraspinal muscle composition was assessed by a multivariate regression analysis adjusted for age, sex, body mass index (BMI), comorbidities, and lumbar degeneration. A total of 301 patients was included. Patients with AAC showed significantly higher degrees of intervertebral disc and facet joint degeneration as well as higher total endplate scores at the L3/4 level. The univariable regression analysis showed a significant positive correlation between the degree of AAC and the FI of the erector spinae (b=0.530, P<0.001) and multifidus (b=0.730, P<0.001). The multivariable regression analysis showed a significant positive correlation between the degree of AAC and the FI of the erector spinae (b=0.270, P=0.006) and a significant negative correlation between the degree of AAC and the CSA of the psoas muscle (b=-0.260, P=0.003). This study demonstrates a significant and independent association between AAC and degeneration of the erector spinae and the psoas muscles in patients undergoing lumbar fusion. As both AAC and degeneration of paraspinal muscles impact postoperative outcomes negatively, preoperative assessment of AAC may aid in identifying patients at higher risk after lumbar surgery.

Incidence of Complications in Obese Patients Undergoing Elective Spine Surgery Under General Anesthesia: A Retrospective Study

Abstract Background The prevalence of obesity has been increasing worldwide. Simultaneously, the number of obese patients undergoing anesthesia and the risk of anesthesia-related complications are increasing. Our study aimed to identify the incidence of intraoperative anesthetic complications in obese patients undergoing elective spine surgery. Methods Electronic medical records of patients with a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m2 who underwent elective spine surgery at the Neurological Institute of Thailand between January 2018 and December 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. The primary outcome was the incidence of five anesthetic adverse events: difficult intubation, oxygen desaturation, hypotension, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), and pressure skin lesions. Logistic regression was used for statistical analysis. Results A total of 165 obese patients' medical records were analyzed. Their mean age was 56.8 ± 11.9 years, and median BMI (interquartile range) was 32.04 kg/m2 (31.11–34.69 kg/m2). Fifty-one patients (30.9%) experienced adverse events. Six patients (3.6%) with class 3 obesity had anesthetic complications. The most common adverse event was intraoperative hypotension (26.7%), followed by pressure skin lesions (4.2%), intraoperative oxygen desaturation (1.2%), and MACCE (0.6%). No difficult intubations or deaths occurred. Conclusion The incidence of overall intraoperative anesthetic complications in obese patients undergoing spine surgery was 30.9%, and class 3 obesity was an independent risk factor for these complications. Consequently, well-trained, vigilant, and experienced anesthesiologists should manage anesthesia in these patients.

Inadequate Spinal Anesthesia in Lumbar Spine Surgery Is Related to Volume of the Thecal Sac

Spinal anesthesia (SA) is used in lumbar surgery but initial adequate analgesia fails in some patients. In these cases, spinal redosing or conversion to general endotracheal anesthesia is required, both of which are detrimental to the patient experience and surgical workflow. We reviewed cases of lumbar surgery performed under spinal anesthesia from 2017 - 2021. We identified 12 cases of inadequate first dose, then selected 36 random patients as controls. We used a measurement tool to approximate the volume of the dural sac for each patient using T2-weighted sagittal MRI sequences. Patients who had an inadequate first dose of anesthesia had a significantly larger dural sac volume, 22.8 ± 7.9 cm3 in the inadequate dose group, and 17.4 ± 4.7 cm3 in controls (p=0.043). The inadequate dose group was significantly younger, 54.2 ± 8.8 years in failed first dose, and 66.4 ± 11.9 years in control (p=0.001). The groups did not differ by surgical procedure (p=0.238), level (p=0.353), ASA score (p=0.546), or co-morbidities. We found that age, larger height, and dural sac volume are risk factors for an inadequate first dose of SA. The availability of spinal MRI in patients undergoing spine surgery allows the preoperative measurement of their thecal sac size. In the future, this data may be used to personalize spinal anesthesia dosing based on individual anatomic variables and potentially reduce the incidence of failed spinal anesthesia in spine surgery.

Efficacy and utility of antifibrinolytics in pediatric spine surgery: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Antifibrinolytics have gained increasing attention in minimizing blood loss and mitigating the risks associated with massive transfusions, including infection and coagulopathy in pediatric patients undergoing spine surgery. Nevertheless, the selection of optimal agent is still a matter of debate. We aim to review the utility of these agents and compare the efficacy of antifibrinolytics in pediatric and adolescent spine surgeries. A comprehensive search was performed in Scopus, Web of Science, and MEDLINE databases for relevant works. Studies providing quantitative data on predefined outcomes were included. Primary outcome was perioperative bleeding between the groups. Secondary outcomes included transfusion volume, rate of complications, and operation time. Twenty-eight studies were included in the meta-analysis incorporating 2553 patients. The use of Tranexamic acid (RoM: 0.71, 95%CI: [0.62-0.81], p < 0.001, I2 = 88%), Aprotinin (RoM: 0.54, 95%CI: [0.46-0.64], p < 0.001, I2 = 0%), and Epsilon-aminocaproic acid (RoM: 0.71, 95%CI: [0.62-0.81], p < 0.001, I2 = 60%) led to a 29%, 46%, and 29% reduction in perioperative blood loss, respectively. Network meta-analysis revealed higher probability of efficacy with Tranexamic acid compared to Epsilon-aminocaproic acid (P score: 0.924 vs. 0.571). The rate of complications was not statistically different between each two antifibrinolytic agent or antifibrinolytics compared to placebo or standard of care. Our network meta-analysis suggests a superior efficacy of all antifibrinolytics compared to standard of care/placebo in reducing blood loss and transfusion rate. Further adequately-powered randomized clinical trials are recommended to reach definite conclusion on comparative performance of these agents and to also provide robust objective assessments and standardized outcome data and safety profile on antifibrinolytics in pediatric and adolescent pediatric surgeries.

Cervical Spine Surgery Following COVID-19 Infection: When is it Safe to Proceed?

Retrospective. We utilized the NIH National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C) database to characterize the risk profile of patients undergoing spine surgery during multiple time windows following the COVID-19 infection. While the impact of COVID-19 on various organ systems is well documented, there is limited knowledge regarding its effect on perioperative complications following spine surgery or the optimal timing of surgery after an infection. We asked the National COVID Cohort Collaborative for patients who underwent cervical spine surgery. Patients were stratified into those with an initial documented COVID-19 infection within 3 time periods: 0-2 weeks, 2-6 weeks, or 6-12 weeks before surgery. A total of 29,449 patients who underwent anterior approach cervical spine surgery and 46,379 patients who underwent posterior approach cervical spine surgery were included. Patients who underwent surgery within 2 weeks of their COVID-19 diagnosis had a significantly increased risk for venous thromboembolic events, sepsis, 30-day mortality, and 1-year mortality, irrespective of the anterior or posterior approach. Among patients undergoing surgery between 2 and 6 weeks after COVID-19 infection, the 30-day mortality risk remained elevated in patients undergoing a posterior approach only. Patients undergoing surgery between 6 and 12 weeks from the date of the COVID-19 infection did not show significantly elevated rates of any complications analyzed. Patients undergoing either anterior or posterior cervical spine surgery within 2 weeks from the initial COVID-19 diagnosis are at increased risk for perioperative venous thromboembolic events, sepsis, and mortality. Elevated perioperative complication risk does not persist beyond 2 weeks, except for 30-day mortality in posterior approach surgeries. On the basis of these results, it may be warranted to postpone nonurgent spine surgeries for at least 2 weeks following a COVID-19 infection and advise patients of the increased perioperative complication risk when urgent surgery is required.

Preoperative nutritional status and postoperative health outcomes in older adults undergoing spine surgery: Electronic health records analysis

AimTo examine whether a high nutritional risk status, assessed via the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI), is independently associated with postoperative health outcomes, including unplanned intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, infectious complications, and prolonged length of stay in older patients undergoing spine surgery. MethodsWe conducted a retrospective descriptive study analyzing electronic health records from a tertiary hospital, including data from 1,014 patients aged ≥70 undergoing elective spine surgery between February 2013 and March 2023. ResultsHigh nutritional risk patients had significantly higher odds of unplanned ICU admission, infectious complications, and prolonged length of stay compared to low-risk patients. For each one-point increase in GNRI, there was a significant 0.91- and 0.95-fold decrease in the odds of unplanned ICU admission and infectious complications, respectively. ConclusionGNRI screening in older patients before spine surgery may have potential to identify those at elevated risk for postoperative adverse outcomes.

116 The Role of Spinal Surgery Among NF2 Patients With Spinal Tumors: Surgery-associated Characteristics and Response to Bevacizumab

INTRODUCTION: Neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) patients develop spinal neoplasms. Determining indications for spine surgery remains challenging, as localization of spine related symptoms can be confounded by intracranial or peripheral neuropathology. Additionally, patient selection must be balanced with pre-existing comorbidities NF2 incurs with the goal to maintain or improve quality of life. METHODS: Seventy-nine patients were enrolled retrospectively based upon NF2 diagnosis and radiographic presence of spine tumors from three tertiary academic centers. Demographic data, clinical findings, treatment course, and spine tumor pathology were collected for all patients. RESULTS: Forty-eight percent of patients received spine surgery (38/79, 48.1%). Patients undergoing spine surgery had lower age of symptom onset (15.4 vs. 25.6, p = 0.015), increased cervical (4.2 vs 2.4, p = 0.005) and overall spine tumor burden (10.3 vs 6.2, p &lt; 0.001) and presence of neck (9 vs 1, p = 0.006) and radicular pain (8 vs 1, p = 0.012). Over a quarter of our patients received BEV (25/79, 31.6%), with majority experiencing symptom onset before age 20 (17/19, 89.5%). Schwannoma was the most common BEV-treated pathology. Only one patient experienced worsening of tumor burden at one year while on BEV, and five patients required spine surgery after receiving BEV. CONCLUSIONS: NF2 patients who require spine surgery typically present at younger ages with large cervical spine tumor burden and associated symptomology. It is crucial that surgery-associated demographics and symptomology are identified. BEV was utilized in patients with aggressive, early-onset spine disease. Further, BEV halted spine disease progression in all patients except one, with minimal additional spine surgery required. Its ability to slow aggressive, NF2-associated spine tumors should be considered for clinical trial.

Anesthesia Considerations in Patients Undergoing Spine Surgery with Evoked Potential Monitoring

Intra-operative neuromonitoring (IONM) facilitates monitoring of the functional integrity of neural structures under general anesthesia. It aids in early detection of injury and minimizes postoperative neurologic deficit. IONM may be used during spine surgery, where either the blood supply to the spinal cord could be compromised or the surgical procedures where there is manipulation of the spinal cord. Somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) and motor evoked potentials (MEPs) are used to monitor the sensory and motor tracts in the spinal cord, respectively. Preoperatively, a team of surgeons, anesthetists, and neurophysiologists must discuss about modalities of IONM to be used, expected changes, and alarm criteria. Anesthesia drugs need to be appropriately selected to facilitate IONM, as they affect the SSEP and MEP response obtained. Both total intravenous anesthesia and balanced anesthesia technique may be used, with appropriate titration of drugs. False-positive changes in evoked potentials (EPs) must be prevented by a steady anesthesia state and physiologic parameters. It is preferable to have a checklist to follow whenever changes in EP response are observed to rule out surgical, anesthetic, and monitoring-related causes for change in response. Risk–benefit must be assessed before the selection of a patient for EP monitoring as it may be rarely associated with complications such as burns, seizures, and bite injuries to lips, tongue, and endotracheal tube. Teamwork with meticulous planning, preparation, and multidisciplinary communication is essential for the safe conduct of spine surgeries with SSEP and MEP monitoring. In this review, we discuss various considerations for anesthesia management in patients with intraoperative EP monitoring.

Earlier Radiation Is Associated with Improved 1-Year Survival After Metastatic Spine Tumor Surgery

ObjectivesIn patients undergoing metastatic spine surgery, we sought to: 1) report time to postoperative radiation therapy (RT), 2) describe the predictive factors of time to postoperative RT, and 3) determine if earlier postoperative RT is associated with improved local recurrence (LR) and overall survival (OS). MethodsA single-center, retrospective cohort study was undertaken of all patients undergoing spine surgery for extradural metastatic disease and receiving RT within 3-months postoperatively between 02/2010-01/2021. Time to postoperative RT was dichotomized at <1month vs. 1-3months. The primary outcomes were LR, OS, and 1-year survival. Secondary outcomes were wound complication, Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS), and Modified McCormick Scale (MMS). Regression analyses controlled for age, BMI, tumor size, preoperative RT, preoperative/postoperative chemotherapy, and type of RT. ResultsOf 76 patients undergoing spinal metastasis surgery and receiving postoperative RT within 3-months, 34(44.7%) received RT within 1month and 42(55.2%) within 1-3months. Patients with larger tumor size (β=-3.58,95%CI=-6.59,-0.57,p=0.021) or new neurological deficits (β=-16.21,95%CI=-32.21,-0.210,p=0.047) had a shorter time to RT. No significant association was found between time to RT and LR or OS on multivariable logistic/Cox regression. However, patients who received RT between 1-3month had a lower odd of 1-year survival compared to those receiving RT within 1month (OR=0.18,95%CI=0.04-0.74,p=0.022). Receiving RT within 1month vs. 1-3month was not associated with wound complications (7.1% vs. 2.9%,p=0.556)(OR=4.40,95%CI=0.40-118.0,p=0.266) or KPS/MMS. ConclusionsSpine surgeons, oncologists, and radiation oncologists should make every effort to start RT within 1 month to improve 1-year survival after metastatic spine tumor surgery.

Evaluating a targeted person-centred pain management intervention programme in lumbar spine surgery - a controlled segment-specific before-and-after interventional design

BackgroundPostoperative pain management in lumbar spine surgery care remains a challenge. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of a person-centred postoperative pain management intervention programme on lumbar spine surgery patients on postoperative pain, shared decision-making, and satisfaction with postoperative pain management.MethodsThe study was performed with a controlled before-and-after interventional design in an orthopaedic unit at a university hospital. Person-centred pain management for patients undergoing spine surgery was developed in co-creation by a multi-professional team and implemented throughout the care pathway. The usual care group (pre-intervention) served as a comparison to the intervention group. Pain intensity, shared decision-making in pain management, and patient satisfaction with results of pain management, served as patient-reported measures, collected using the International Pain Outcomes questionnaire and analysed using descriptive statistics.ResultsThe intervention showed no benefit for patients’ pain and satisfaction, while shared decision-making in pain management was significant lower in the intervention group than in the conventional group. The per-protocol analysis showed no significant differences between groups.ConclusionThe initial assumption of the study, that the implementation of a co-created structured person-centred care pathway would improve patient-reported outcomes, was not confirmed. The periodically low fidelity to the intervention due to organizational constraints (due to sub-optimal organizational conditions and managerial support) may have affected the results.

Deformable registration of preoperative MR and intraoperative long-length tomosynthesis images for guidance of spine surgery via image synthesis

PurposeImproved integration and use of preoperative imaging during surgery hold significant potential for enhancing treatment planning and instrument guidance through surgical navigation. Despite its prevalent use in diagnostic settings, MR imaging is rarely used for navigation in spine surgery. This study aims to leverage MR imaging for intraoperative visualization of spine anatomy, particularly in cases where CT imaging is unavailable or when minimizing radiation exposure is essential, such as in pediatric surgery. MethodsThis work presents a method for deformable 3D-2D registration of preoperative MR images with a novel intraoperative long-length tomosynthesis imaging modality (viz., Long-Film [LF]). A conditional generative adversarial network is used to translate MR images to an intermediate bone image suitable for registration, followed by a model-based 3D-2D registration algorithm to deformably map the synthesized images to LF images. The algorithm’s performance was evaluated on cadaveric specimens with implanted markers and controlled deformation, and in clinical images of patients undergoing spine surgery as part of a large-scale clinical study on LF imaging. ResultsThe proposed method yielded a median 2D projection distance error of 2.0 mm (interquartile range [IQR]: 1.1–3.3 mm) and a 3D target registration error of 1.5 mm (IQR: 0.8–2.1 mm) in cadaver studies. Notably, the multi-scale approach exhibited significantly higher accuracy compared to rigid solutions and effectively managed the challenges posed by piecewise rigid spine deformation. The robustness and consistency of the method were evaluated on clinical images, yielding no outliers on vertebrae without surgical instrumentation and 3% outliers on vertebrae with instrumentation. ConclusionsThis work constitutes the first reported approach for deformable MR to LF registration based on deep image synthesis. The proposed framework provides access to the preoperative annotations and planning information during surgery and enables surgical navigation within the context of MR images and/or dual-plane LF images.

A Clinical Practice Guideline for Prevention, Diagnosis and Management of Intraoperative Spinal Cord Injury: Recommendations for Use of Intraoperative Neuromonitoring and for the Use of Preoperative and Intraoperative Protocols for Patients Undergoing Spine Surgery.

Development of a clinical practice guideline following the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) process. The objectives of this study were to develop guidelines that outline the utility of intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) to detect intraoperative spinal cord injury (ISCI) among patients undergoing spine surgery, to define a subset of patients undergoing spine surgery at higher risk for ISCI and to develop protocols to prevent, diagnose, and manage ISCI. All systematic reviews were performed according to PRISMA standards and registered on PROSPERO. A multidisciplinary, international Guidelines Development Group (GDG) reviewed and discussed the evidence using GRADE protocols. Consensus was defined by 80% agreement among GDG members. A systematic review and diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) meta-analysis was performed to synthesize pooled evidence on the diagnostic accuracy of IONM to detect ISCI among patients undergoing spinal surgery. The IONM modalities evaluated included somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs), motor evoked potentials (MEPs), electromyography (EMG), and multimodal neuromonitoring. Utilizing this knowledge and their clinical experience, the multidisciplinary GDG created recommendations for the use of IONM to identify ISCI in patients undergoing spine surgery. The evidence related to existing care pathways to manage ISCI was summarized and based on this a novel AO Spine-PRAXIS care pathway was created. Our recommendations are as follows: (1) We recommend that intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring be employed for high risk patients undergoing spine surgery, and (2) We suggest that patients at "high risk" for ISCI during spine surgery be proactively identified, that after identification of such patients, multi-disciplinary team discussions be undertaken to manage patients, and that an intraoperative protocol including the use of IONM be implemented. A care pathway for the prevention, diagnosis, and management of ISCI has been developed by the GDG. We anticipate that these guidelines will promote the use of IONM to detect and manage ISCI, and promote the use of preoperative and intraoperative checklists by surgeons and other team members for high risk patients undergoing spine surgery. We welcome teams to implement and evaluate the care pathway created by our GDG.

Accuracy of Intraoperative Neuromonitoring in the Diagnosis of Intraoperative Neurological Decline in the Setting of Spinal Surgery-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Systematic review and meta-analysis. In an effort to prevent intraoperative neurological injury during spine surgery, the use of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) has increased significantly in recent years. Using IONM, spinal cord function can be evaluated intraoperatively by recording signals from specific nerve roots, motor tracts, and sensory tracts. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) studies to evaluate the efficacy of IONM among patients undergoing spine surgery for any indication. The current systematic review and meta-analysis was performed using the Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis statement for Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies (PRISMA-DTA) and was registered on PROSPERO. A comprehensive search was performed using MEDLINE, EMBASE and SCOPUS for all studies assessing the diagnostic accuracy of neuromonitoring, including somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP), motor evoked potential (MEP) and electromyography (EMG), either on their own or in combination (multimodal). Studies were included if they reported raw numbers for True Positives (TP), False Negatives (FN), False Positives (FP) and True Negative (TN) either in a 2 × 2 contingency table or in text, and if they used postoperative neurologic exam as a reference standard. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were calculated to evaluate the overall efficacy of each modality type using a bivariate model adapted by Reitsma et al, for all spine surgeries and for individual disease groups and regions of spine. The risk of bias (ROB) of included studies was assessed using the quality assessment tool for diagnostic accuracy studies (QUADAS-2). A total of 163 studies were included; 52 of these studies with 16,310 patients reported data for SSEP, 68 studies with 71,144 patients reported data for MEP, 16 studies with 7888 patients reported data for EMG and 69 studies with 17,968 patients reported data for multimodal monitoring. The overall sensitivity, specificity, DOR and AUC for SSEP were 71.4% (95% CI 54.8-83.7), 97.1% (95% CI 95.3-98.3), 41.9 (95% CI 24.1-73.1) and .899, respectively; for MEP, these were 90.2% (95% CI 86.2-93.1), 96% (95% CI 94.3-97.2), 103.25 (95% CI 69.98-152.34) and .927; for EMG, these were 48.3% (95% CI 31.4-65.6), 92.9% (95% CI 84.4-96.9), 11.2 (95% CI 4.84-25.97) and .773; for multimodal, these were found to be 83.5% (95% CI 81-85.7), 93.8% (95% CI 90.6-95.9), 60 (95% CI 35.6-101.3) and .895, respectively. Using the QUADAS-2 ROB analysis, of the 52 studies reporting on SSEP, 13 (25%) were high-risk, 10 (19.2%) had some concerns and 29 (55.8%) were low-risk; for MEP, 8 (11.7%) were high-risk, 21 had some concerns and 39 (57.3%) were low-risk; for EMG, 4 (25%) were high-risk, 3 (18.75%) had some concerns and 9 (56.25%) were low-risk; for multimodal, 14 (20.3%) were high-risk, 13 (18.8%) had some concerns and 42 (60.7%) were low-risk. These results indicate that all neuromonitoring modalities have diagnostic utility in successfully detecting impending or incident intraoperative neurologic injuries among patients undergoing spine surgery for any condition, although it is clear that the accuracy of each modality differs.PROSPERO Registration Number: CRD42023384158.

Gaps in cognitive care among older patients undergoing spine surgery.

Among older adults undergoing surgery, postoperative delirium is the most common complication. Cognitive impairment and dementia are major risk factors for postoperative delirium, yet they are frequently under-recognized. It is well established that applying delirium preventive interventions to at-risk individuals can reduce the likelihood of delirium by up to 40%. The aim of this study was to evaluate how often delirium preventive interventions are missing in patients at risk for delirium due to baseline cognitive impairment. We conducted a retrospective study using data from the observational study Perioperative Anesthesia Neurocognitive Disorder Assessment-Geriatric (PANDA-G) and clinical data from the University of California San Francisco delirium prevention bundle. Patients age 65+ received preoperative multidomain cognitive assessment as part of a research protocol prior to undergoing inpatient spine surgery at a single major academic institution. Results of the cognitive testing were not available to clinical teams. Using electronic medical records, we evaluated if patients who were cognitively impaired at baseline received delirium prevention orders, sleep orders, and avoidance of AGS Beers Criteria® potentially inappropriate medications. Of the 245 patients included in the study, 42% were women. The mean [SD] age was 72 [5.2] years. Preoperative cognitive impairment was identified in 40% of participants (N = 98), and of these, 34% had postoperative delirium. Of patients with preoperative cognitive impairment, 45% did not receive delirium preventive orders, 43% received PIMs, and 49% were missing sleep orders. At least one of the three delirium preventive interventions was missing in 70% of the patients. Undiagnosed preoperative cognitive impairment among older adults undergoing spine surgery is common. When cognitive test results were not available to clinicians, patients with baseline cognitive impairment frequently did not receive evidence-based delirium preventive interventions. These findings highlight an opportunity to improve perioperative brain health care via preoperative cognitive assessment and clinical communication.