Patients Undergoing Breast Conservation Research Articles

Evaluating the Effect of MarginProbe® Use on Re-excisions After Partial Mastectomy: A Single-Institution Analysis.

Breast conservation therapy is a widely accepted approach in treating breast cancer, yet the average re-excision rates are approximately 25% despite surgical advancements. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved MarginProbe® device uses radiofrequency spectroscopy for intraoperative margin assessment, potentially reducing re-excision rates. This study evaluated the effectiveness of MarginProbe® in reducing re-excisions compared with standard of care (SOC). A prospective cohort with MarginProbe® usage during partial mastectomies from June 2019 to July 2023 (153 patients) was compared with a retrospective control group without the device from January 2015 to May 2019 (300 patients). Both groups underwent partial mastectomies performed by two breast surgeons. Positive margins were defined as tumor on ink for invasive cancers and within 2 mm for ductal carcinoma in situ. When control was used for patient demographics and tumor characteristics, the findings showed that MarginProbe® significantly decreased the probability of re-excision by 58% (p<0.001), although it led to a higher shave volume, with an average of 9.8cc additional tissue removed compared with SOC (p < 0.001). Human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) positivity was significantly associated with increased odds of re-excision (p = 0.036). MarginProbe® demonstrated a sensitivity of 70.1% and a specificity of 47.5%. MarginProbe® is an effective adjunct for intraoperative margin assessment to decrease re-excision rates. However, patient selection is paramount. Given its significant increase in shave volume, women with small breasts may be at higher risk for poor cosmesis. Surgeons should exercise clinical judgement when determining the suitability of MarginProbe® use for patients undergoing breast conservation. Further research is necessary to refine MarginProbe®'s specificity and to optimize its clinical application.

Long-term clinical outcomes of male breast cancer patients treated with curative intent by trimodality therapy at an academic university hospital in India.

Male breast cancer is rare and accounts for less than 1% of all breast cancer cases worldwide. This retrospective cohort study included all patients of invasive male breast cancer treated with curative intent by a trimodality approach via a multidisciplinary team at an academic university hospital in India between 2009 and 2023. Records were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Clinicopathological parameters, treatment details and survival were recorded and analysed. Thirty-four patients were included. The median (IQR) age was 55(44-63) years. Most patients were overall stage III (74%) and node positive (79%) with Scarff-Bloom-Richardson grade II (50%). Twenty-five patients (73%) were oestrogen receptor (ER) positive. Lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) and perineural invasion (PNI) were present in 62% and 21% of patients, respectively. The most common chemotherapy timing was adjuvant (53%) followed by neoadjuvant (41%), and the most commonly used regimen consisted of a combination of doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide followed by a taxane (53%). Most (85%) patients underwent a mastectomy, five patients underwent breast conservation. All patients received radiotherapy to a dose of 42.6 Gy in 16 fractions, followed by a tumour bed boost for those undergoing breast conservation. At a median follow-up of 70 months (range 10-159 months), the five and ten-year overall survival was 91% and 58%, and the five-year disease-free survival (DFS) was 67%. The median DFS was 72 months. On univariate analysis, the tumour sub-type (Luminal versus TNBC) significantly predicted DFS (P = 0.03 log-rank). Breast cancer in males has a high incidence of node positivity, ER positivity and LVSI. Even with advanced stages at presentation, trimodality therapy in a multidisciplinary setting offers good long-term outcomes.

Neoadjuvant pertuzumab, docetaxel, carboplatin, and trastuzumab (PTCH) regimen in patients with HER2 positive early, locally advanced, and oligometastatic breast cancer: Real-world Indian experience.

e12556 Background: Pertuzumab/docetaxel/carboplatin/trastuzumab (PTCH) regimen constitutes one of the standard neoadjuvant treatments in human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) positive breast cancer. The real-world outcomes of its use from the Indian sub-continent are lacking. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 114 HER2-positive BC patients presenting with nonmetastatic or oligometastatic disease and treated with a uniform PTCH regimen in a neoadjuvant setting at the All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India, between Jan 2015 to May 2023. Total six cycles of PTCH [pertuzumab (840 mg loading followed by 420 mg), docetaxel (75 mg/m2), carboplatin (AUC 6), trastuzumab (8 mg/kg loading followed by 6 mg/kg) q21 days] were administered with primary GCSF prophylaxis. The primary outcome was invasive disease-free survival (iDFS). The secondary outcomes included pathological complete response (pCR) rates, overall survival (OS), and toxicity. Adjuvant trastuzumab is used for patients achieving pCR, while for patients not achieving pCR option of adjuvant trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) or trastuzumab was decided based on patient affordability. Results: One hundred and fourteen (114) patients were included with a median age of 47 years (range, 23-70). Overall, 52 (45.6%) patients had hormone-positive disease and 73 (64.01%) were premenopausal. Forty patients (35.08%) had stage II, 62 (54.38%) had stage III, and 12(10.5%) had oligometastatic disease. Sixty-one (53.5%) patients underwent breast conservation surgery and pCR was observed in 62 (54.38%) cases. With a median follow-up of 31 months, the 3-year iDFS was 81.5% and overall OS was not reached. Median iDFS was 33 months in patients with node-positive disease and was not reached in patients with node-negative disease. Three-year iDFS was 68.1% in patients who achieved pCR and 49.8% in those who did not achieve pCR (p=0.001). Grade 3/4 toxicity was seen in 26.7% of patients which caused dose modification and interruption in 13.9% of patients. The most common grade 3/4 toxicity was diarrhea in16 (14.03%) cases and thrombocytopenia in 11 (9.6)% cases . Febrile neutropenia was seen in 4 (3.5%) patients. Four patients (3.5%) had a reversible decrease in cardiac left ventricular ejection fraction. Conclusions: In a real-world context, PTCH is an effective and safe anthracycline-free regimen for use in curative (adjuvant and neoadjuvant) setting for HER2 positive breast cancer in Indian women Using neoadjuvant PTCH may improve pCR and obviate the need for adjuvant T-DM1 after surgery making it a cost-effective strategy in limited recourse setting. The survival outcomes were significantly better among those with node-negative disease and among those who achieved a pCR.

An overview of psychological analysis of patients with breast cancer undergoing total mastectomy and breast conservation surgery and its impact on objectified body consciousness at a tertiary care cancer centre.

e12537 Background: Breast cancer is the most common cancer among females, and surgery plays a central role in its treatment. Surgical treatments may have a negative psychological impact on women’s mental health regarding their body image. The purpose of this study was to compare the psychological health insights pertaining to objectified body consciousness scores before and after the surgery and also to observe whether these scores were comparable across the surgery types. Methods: This retrospective qualitative study included 706 breast carcinoma patients who underwent either Breast Conservation Surgery or Total Mastectomy at Manipal Cancer Centre, between the years 2020-2021. A validated questionnaire of Objectified Body Consciousness was used to obtain responses at diagnosis and at 6 months postsurgery and final scores were calculated for both instances. Two sample t- tests/analysis of variance and Chi-square tests were used to compare continuous and categorical variables respectively. Results: Out of total 706 breast cancer patients, 402 patients underwent Breast Conservation Surgery and 304 underwent Total Mastectomy procedure. A statistically significant change was seen in the mean Objectified Body Consciousness Score (14.22±15.44) for all patients when compared pre-operatively (72.72±11.38) and postoperatively (60.15±17.58). This change was higher in the Total Mastectomy group (29.38±11.53). Also, statistically significant rise in scores was seen with increasing age. There was a statistically significant difference between BCS and Total Mastectomy groups with respect to the distribution of age group, marital status, types of cancer, stage and grade of cancer, NACT administration and postoperative mean objectified body consciousness scores of patients (p-value &lt;0.05). Conclusions: We could affirmatively conclude in our study that younger breast cancer patients and all patients who underwent a total mastectomy, had more psychological apprehension with the body image post-surgery, signifying these groups should be encouraged by healthcare professionals to reach out for counselling at the earliest. Knowing the pre-operative Objectified Body Consciousness scores and the type of surgery the patient is going to undergo, will help us to streamline categorical psycho-educational programs for each group and personalise our healthcare professionals to encourage women to reach out to social support groups and directed counselling at the earliest. This will help women adapt to their transformed life and be mentally prepared for the changes that are expected post-surgery.

A Prospective Study of the Efficacy of Endofascial Axillary Dissection to Reduce Axillary Seroma Formation

Abstract Introduction Seroma formation is a common complication following axillary dissection. The pathogenesis of seroma is poorly understood. Various chemical and mechanical methods have been tried to reduce seroma with varying results. In this study, we look at a novel method of axillary dissection to reduce seroma and its attendant morbidity. The objective of the study is to compare endofascial axillary lymphadenectomy with routine axillary lymphadenectomy regarding axillary drain output following breast conservation surgery. Methods We did a prospective interventional study of endofascial axillary dissection in patients undergoing breast conservation surgery. Comparison was done with historical controls who underwent breast conservation surgery with routine axillary lymphadenectomy before the study period. All patients were operated by the same surgeon. Results Breast conservation surgery with endofascial axillary dissection was performed in 36 patients and compared with 36 patients who underwent routine axillary dissection before the study period. The mean total axillary drain output in the endofascial and routine groups were 796.8 and 1,259.3 mL, respectively (p = 0.001). The average day of drain removal in the endofascial and routine groups were 10.8 and 14.9 days, respectively (p = 0.001). The nodal yield of the endofascial and routine groups were 15.3 and 16.4 nodes, respectively (p = 0.449). The duration of surgery of the endofascial and routine groups were 89.3 and 85.1 minutes, respectively (p = 0.366). Conclusion Endofascial axillary dissection significantly reduced the mean total axillary drain output and resulted in early drain removal compared with routine axillary dissection. There were no significant differences in the nodal yield, operative time, seroma aspirations, and wound complications between the endofascial and routine axillary dissection groups.

Abstract PO3-20-05: Phase II Study of Genomically Guided Radiation Dose Personalization in the Management of Triple Negative Breast Cancer

Abstract Background: Our group has previously developed the radiosensitivity index (RSI) using a multigene expression model that is directly proportional to tumor radioresistance (high RSI = increased radioresistance). RSI has been previously validated in two datasets of patients with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). In this study, we will run a selective dose personalization study in TNBC patients undergoing breast conservation therapy (BCT). Based on patients RSI scores, they will either receive a radiation therapy (RT) boost of 10 Gy to the tumor cavity or not. Given our data in two independent datasets, the current study will reveal the feasibility and benefit of selective genomic dose personalization in TNBC following BCT. Trial Design: The study is designed as a prospective, nonrandomized, phase II trial of genomically guided RT in the management of TNBC undergoing BCT. Patients will be allocated to one of two groups based on their RSI determination from fresh frozen tissue collected by biopsy or at the time of BCT. These groups will be Group A, RSI optimized whole breast radiotherapy alone or with a 10 Gy boost or Group B, RSI not optimized whole breast radiotherapy with a boost of 10 Gy to tumor cavity. Patients will receive standard of care chemotherapy, neoadjuvant or adjuvant. Eligibility: TNBC patients undergoing BCT. Specific Aims: To determine the three-year local control following genomically guided dose personalization in the management of TNBC following BCT. Secondary objectives include determination of overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), and quality of life (QOL) following genomically guided dose personalization. Statistical Methods: The primary hypothesis is the three-year local control rates differ for groups A and B, against the null hypothesis that the two rates are identical. Patients will allocate approximately 78% in group A and 22% in group B and local control rates are expected to be 96% and 75%, respectively. Assuming 80% power and 10% type I error for a log-rank test, 86 patients are needed. An interim analysis will be completed when 4 disease progression events are observed. There will be approximately 43 patients at the time of interim analysis. Patient Accrual: This study is open with 1 patient enrolled at the time of submission. A total of 86 patients will be enrolled. Contact Information: Kamran A. Ahmed MD, Moffitt Cancer Center, email: kamran.ahmed@moffitt.org, Clinical trial information: NCT05115474. Funding: Moffitt and Morton Plant Mease Foundations. Citation Format: Kamran Ahmed, Iman Washington, Matthew Mills, Michelle DeJesus, Youngchul Kim, Ronica Nanda, Javier Torres-Roca, Steven Eschrich, Janis De La Iglesia, John Puskas, Marilin Rosa, Jason Wilson, Paula Lundgren, Negar Golesorkhi, Nazanin Khakpour, Susan Hoover, Marie Lee, John Kiluk, Melissa Mallory, Christine Laronga, Laura Kruper, Brian Czerniecki, Roberto Diaz. Phase II Study of Genomically Guided Radiation Dose Personalization in the Management of Triple Negative Breast Cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO3-20-05.

Abstract PO5-23-05: The Impact of Bi-Annual Diagnostic Imaging on Detecting Ipsilateral Breast Recurrence in Patients Undergoing Breast Conserving Surgery for Breast Cancer

Abstract Introduction: Breast conserving surgery (BCS) represents the preferred option for surgical treatment for a majority of patients with early-stage breast cancer who are eligible for this approach. When compared with mastectomy approaches, BCS provides patients with equivalent survival while preserving the affected breast. It is necessary to achieve clear surgical margins as positive lumpectomy margins are associated with an increased risk for ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence. With advances in imaging techniques, as well as effective systemic therapy and contemporary radiation therapy, local recurrence after BCS has decreased and overall survival for patients has improved. Retrospective studies have quantified the recurrence rate in unifocal breast cancer as 8 - 15% at 20 years. The NCCN recommends annual mammography at least 6 months after post-lumpectomy radiation therapy, but there is little data regarding more frequent surveillance after lumpectomy in the early post-operative setting. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of short interval surveillance mammography on the detection of early in-breast recurrence in patients undergoing BCS. Methods: Our IRB-approved Breast Cancer Database was queried for patients enrolled from 11/2009 to 6/2023 who underwent breast conservation surgery for a diagnosis of in situ or invasive breast cancer in this retrospective analysis. Per our institutional protocol, patients were recommended to undergo diagnostic mammography of the treated breast(s) every 6 months for 2 years after BCS. After the initial 2 year period, bilateral mammography was performed annually in the absence of other indications. Additional supplemental imaging such as breast ultrasound and MRI were performed at physician discretion and based on patient risk and breast density. Variables of interest included the presence of pathogenic germline mutations, family history of breast cancer, and disease characteristics. Our primary endpoint was ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence. Results: Of 2491 patients who underwent breast conservation surgery for in situ or invasive breast cancer, 191 (7.7%) developed recurrent disease, including ipsilateral and contralateral recurrence, and distant disease, in the study period. A total of 83 (3.2%) patients developed ipsilateral breast recurrence during the entire study period. Of those, 19 (22.9%) were detected within the first two years after surgery. Six of the 19 patients (31.6%) had their recurrences detected on yearly diagnostic mammography while 6 (31.6%) patients had their recurrences detected on interval 6-month unilateral diagnostic imaging. In both groups, 5/6 recurrences were invasive disease after an original diagnosis of invasive cancer, and the remaining patient had recurrent DCIS. The remaining 7/19 patients (36.8%) had their ipsilateral recurrences detected on palpation or other diagnostic imaging. In this group as well, there was one case of recurrent DCIS, with the remaining 6 cases representing recurrent invasive cancer. Of the 19 patients with ipsilateral recurrences, none had pathogenic germline mutations. 4 of the 19 patients (21%) had positive margins after their initial lumpectomy surgery with re- excisions required to achieve clear margins. Conclusion: Interval diagnostic surveillance imaging every 6 months after breast conserving surgery identified almost one-third of the ipsilateral breast tumor recurrences that occurred within the first 2 years after surgery in our population. While our numbers are small, the relationship of re-excision lumpectomy surgery to subsequent risk for local recurrence has been described by others, and bears further study. Particularly in view of our observation that the majority of in-breast recurrences were invasive, our data supports the practice of more frequent imaging follow up in the first 2 years after breast conserving surgery. Citation Format: Pabel Miah, Laura Fiedler, Anthony Baez, Athanasios Sevdalis, Alyssa Marmer, Charles DiMaggio, Linda Pak, Richard Shapiro, Karen Hiotis, Deborah Axelrod, Amber Guth, Freya Schnabel. The Impact of Bi-Annual Diagnostic Imaging on Detecting Ipsilateral Breast Recurrence in Patients Undergoing Breast Conserving Surgery for Breast Cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO5-23-05.

Surveillance Imaging in Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Breast Conserving Surgery With Chest Wall Perforator Flap Reconstruction

Surveillance Imaging in Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Breast Conserving Surgery With Chest Wall Perforator Flap Reconstruction

An Overview of Psychological Analysis of Breast Cancer Patients undergoing Modified Radical Mastectomy and Breast Conservation Surgery and its impact on Objectified Body Consciousness at a Tertiary Care Cancer Centre in South India

BackgroundBreast cancer is the most common cancer among females, and surgery plays a central role in its treatment. Surgical treatments may have a negative psychological impact on women's mental health regarding their body image. The purpose of this study was to compare the psychological health insights pertaining to objectified body consciousness scores before and after the surgery and also to observe whether these scores were comparable across the surgery types. Materials and MethodsThis retrospective analysis of prospectively maintained data included 706 breast carcinoma patients who underwent either Breast Conservation Surgery or Modified Radical Mastectomy at tertiary care Cancer Centre, between the years 2020 to 2021. A validated questionnaire of Objectified Body Consciousness was used to obtain responses at diagnosis and at 6 months postsurgery and final scores were calculated for both instances. Two sample t-tests/analysis of variance and Chi-square tests were used to compare continuous and categorical variables respectively. ResultsOut of total 706 breast cancer patients, 402 patients underwent Breast Conservation Surgery and 304 underwent Modified radical mastectomy procedure. A statistically significant change was seen in the mean Objectified Body Consciousness Score (14.22 ± 15.44) for all patients when compared preoperatively(72.72 ± 11.38) and postoperatively(60.15 ± 17.58). This change was higher in the Modified Radical Mastectomy group(29.38 ± 11.53). Also, statistically significant rise in scores was seen with increasing age. ConclusionWe could affirmatively conclude in our study that younger breast cancer patients and all patients who underwent a Modified Radical Mastectomy, had more psychological apprehension with the body image postsurgery, signifying these groups should be encouraged by healthcare professionals to reach out for counselling at the earliest.

10-year mastectomy trends among breast cancer phenotypes: A national cohort study.

584 Background: Breast cancer tumor phenotype has prognostic value with triple negative (TN) cancers having higher rates of distant metastases early. While tumor phenotypes are prognostic, published data demonstrates that the choice of local therapy does not affect this predisposition or affect survival. This study was performed to determine whether mastectomy is being performed more frequently for TN or HER2+ phenotypes, relative to hormone receptor positive (HR+) phenotypes despite the lack of benefit this should provide. Methods: Data from the National Cancer Database (NCDB) was analyzed from 2010 through 2019 to assess mastectomy trends and associations with patient and tumor characteristics. Women with invasive breast cancer were included. Women with Stage IV disease were excluded. Patients were categorized as mastectomy or breast conservation surgery. Patient and tumor characteristics were compared across groups using chi-square and Wilcoxon rank sum tests, and a multivariable logistic regression model was fit to assess the association between mastectomy and tumor phenotype controlling for patient and tumor characteristics. Results: 543,590 patients were evaluated. 173,380 (31.9%) patients underwent mastectomy, and 370,210 (68.1%) patients underwent breast conservation surgery. Mean age at diagnosis was 56. There were 425,174 HR+, 64,960 HER2+, and 53,456 TN tumors. The proportion of patients undergoing mastectomy peaked in 2013 at 36.14% before declining. Compared to HR+, HER2+ patients were more likely to undergo mastectomy, OR 1.39 p &lt; 0.0001 (95% CI 1.35 – 1.43); however, there was no significant difference in mastectomy between HR+ patients and TN patients. Compared to whites, black patients were less likely to undergo mastectomy, OR 0.71 p &lt; 0.0001 (95% CI 0.69 – 0.74), and individuals of Hispanic ethnicity less likely to undergo mastectomy, OR 0.92 p &lt; 0.0001 (95% CI 0.89 – 0.95). Compared to private insurance, Medicare had a greater association with mastectomy, OR 1.2 p &lt; 0.0001 (95% CI 1.18 – 1.23). There was no significant difference between other forms of insurance (Medicaid, other government insurance, no insurance) and private insurance. Education and income were not associated with different frequencies of mastectomy. Patients with higher comorbidity scores were more likely to undergo mastectomy. Conclusions: Mastectomy rates have been declining since 2013 at CoC centers. While TN breast cancer is not associated with increased mastectomy percent, mastectomy continues to be performed more frequently for HER2+ positive phenotype when adjusting for tumor and patient characteristics. These data suggest a need for education about HER2 positive phenotype due to a possible lack of understanding about the why such tumors pose a risk, and the role of local therapy in treating them.

Oncoplastic Augmentation Mastopexy in Breast Conservation Therapy: Retrospective Study and Postoperative Complications.

Oncoplastic techniques, in conjunction with lumpectomy and adjuvant radiotherapy, have been demonstrated to achieve good aesthetic results and cancer outcomes in the treatment of patients with macromastia or significant ptosis. This study evaluated a series of patients undergoing breast conservation with concomitant oncoplastic-augmentation-mastopexy and a contralateral augmentation-mastopexy. Patients undergoing lumpectomy for breast conservation were identified via a retrospective chart review. Inclusion criteria included patients with ptosis and preexisting breast implants or insufficient breast volume undergoing oncoplastic implant placement/exchange and mastopexy. Demographic characteristics, operative details, and complications were assessed. Thirty-four consecutive patients (64 breasts, 4 unilateral procedures) were included in the study. Average age was 51.4 years, average body mass index was 27, and 38.2% were smokers/former smokers. The average operative time was 2.5 hours. Furthermore, 38.2% of patients received chemotherapy, and 82.4% of patients received breast adjuvant radiotherapy. The average length of follow-up was 11.7 months. In the sample that received radiation, the capsular contracture rate was 25%, with a 7.1% contracture revision rate. For the entire group, a total of 8 patients (23.5%) underwent revisions for either positive margins (8.8%), capsular contracture (8.8%), implant loss (2.9%), or cosmetic concerns (2.9%). One patient developed a pulmonary embolism. Oncoplastic-augmentation-mastopexy is a safe technique with acceptable complication rates. This technique is best used for breast cancer patients with breast ptosis and a paucity of breast volume or preexisting implants who wish to pursue breast-conserving therapy. The revision rates are acceptable compared with single-stage cosmetic augmentation procedures as well as other oncoplastic techniques described in the literature, but patients must be clearly counseled on contracture risk.

The Impact of Oncoplastic Reduction on Initiation of Adjuvant Radiation and Need for Reexcision: A Database Evaluation.

Partial breast reconstruction with oncoplastic reduction can provide breast cancer patients with improved aesthetic outcomes after breast conservation therapy. This study evaluates the implications of simultaneous oncoplastic reduction with lumpectomy on complication rates, time to adjuvant radiation therapy, and rates of margin reexcision compared with lumpectomy alone. The Clinformatics Data Mart Database is a national deidentified commercial claims data warehouse. From 2003 to 2020, adult female patients were queried to identify patients with a breast cancer diagnosis with International Classification of Disease codes. Among those, current procedural terminology codes were used to identify those who underwent lumpectomy alone versus lumpectomy with oncoplastic reduction. Patient demographics, complications, adjuvant oncologic therapies, and need for reexcision were recorded. Patients not continuously enrolled for at least 6 months before and after the index procedure were excluded. Multivariable regression and χ 2 tests were used for statistical analysis. Of 53,165 patients meeting criteria (mean age, 61.4 ± 11.6 years), 1552 (2.9%) underwent oncoplastic reduction. Diagnoses of most nonsurgical complications (seroma, wound dehiscence, postoperative infection, fat necrosis, tissue necrosis, and nonspecified complications of surgical care) were significantly higher in the oncoplastic reduction group, as were rates of some surgical complications (hematoma, seroma, and tissue debridement). However, undergoing oncoplastic reduction did not impact time to adjuvant radiation ( P = 0.194) and protected against positive margins requiring repeat lumpectomy or completion mastectomy ( P < 0.001). In patients undergoing breast conservation therapy, simultaneous oncoplastic reduction decreased occurrence of positive margins and did not impact time to adjuvant radiation therapy despite increased rates of surgical and nonsurgical complications.

A Prospective Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Intraoperative Injection of Technetium Tc 99m Tilmanocept with Technetium Tc 99m Sulfur Colloid in Breast Cancer Lymphatic Mapping

Introduction. Technetium-labeled sulfur colloid (TSC) is a radiolabeled mapping agent commonly used for sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNBx). Tilmanocept, a CD206 receptor-targeted mapping agent, has gained recent popularity due to potential advantages of rapid and quick uptake to the SLNs. The objectives of this study were to assess (1) the difference in the number of SLNs harvested using tilmanocept versus TSC and (2) the difference in time to transcutaneous localization when using an intraoperative injection approach. Methods. Patients undergoing breast conservation and SLNBx were consented and randomized to receive either 0.5 mCi of filtered TSC or 0.5 mCi of tilmanocept injected intradermally immediately after induction of anesthesia. Axillary transcutaneous gamma detector probe counts were taken at 1-minute intervals until a hot spot was identified. SLNs were then identified and excised. Additional nodes were excised if their counts per second (cps) were greater than 10% of the cps of the hottest SLN. The number of SLNs was based on both number of nodes collected intraoperatively and the number recorded in the final pathology report. Results. The study population consisted of 86 patients, 48 randomized to tilmanocept and 38 to TSC. There were no significant differences in patient or tumor characteristics between the two groups. Localization rates were 100% for both cohorts. The mean number of SLNs identified and removed was not significantly different ( p = 0.34 , intraoperatively; p = 0.57 , pathology reported). Time to transcutaneous localization was 3.3 ± 2.0 minutes for tilmanocept and 3.9 ± 2.3 minutes for TSC ( p = 0.19 ). The average cps for the hottest node was 2,180.0 ± 2,460.5 in the tilmanocept group compared to 2,679.3 ± 2,687.5 in the TSC group ( p = 0.94 ). Conclusion. There was no significant difference in the number of SLNs harvested or in the time to transcutaneous localization when using tilmanocept versus TSC as the radiolabeled mapping agents for intraoperative injection and mapping. Either agent can be used without any significant difference in performance.

Omission of Radiation in Conservative Treatment for Breast Cancer: Opportunity for De-escalation of Care

IntroductionDe-escalation of breast cancer treatment aims to reduce patient and financial toxicity without compromising outcomes. Level I evidence and National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines support omission of adjuvant radiation in patients aged >70 y with hormone-sensitive, pT1N0M0 invasive breast cancer treated with endocrine therapy. We evaluated radiation use in patients eligible for guideline concordant omission of radiation. MethodsSubgroup analysis of patients eligible for radiation omission from two pooled randomized controlled trials, which included stage 0-III breast cancer patients undergoing breast conserving surgery, was performed to evaluate factors associated with radiation use. ResultsOf 631 patients, 47 (7.4%) met radiation omission criteria and were treated by 14 surgeons at eight institutions. The mean age was 75.3 (standard deviation + 4.4) y. Majority of patients identified as White (n = 46; 97.9%) and non-Hispanic (n = 44; 93.6%). The mean tumor size was 1.0 cm; 37 patients (88.1%) had ductal, 4 patients (9.5%) had lobular, and 17 patients (40.5%) had low-grade disease. Among patients eligible for radiation omission, 34 (72.3%) patients received adjuvant radiation. Those who received radiation were significantly younger than those who did not (74 y, interquartile range = 4 y, versus 78 y, interquartile range = 11 y, P = 0.03). There was no difference in radiation use based on size (P = 0.4), histology (P = 0.5), grade (P = 0.7), race (P = 1), ethnicity (P = 0.6), institution (P = 0.1), gender of the surgeon (P = 0.7), or surgeon (P = 0.1). ConclusionsFewer than 10% of patients undergoing breast conservation met criteria for radiation omission. Nearly three-quarters received radiation therapy with younger age being a driver of radiation use, suggesting ample opportunity for de-escalation, particularly among younger eligible patients.

123. The Impact of Oncoplastic Reduction on Initiation of Adjuvant Radiation and Need for Re-excision: A Database Evaluation

Purpose: Partial breast reconstruction with oncoplastic reduction can provide breast cancer patients with improved aesthetic outcomes following breast conservation therapy. This study evaluates the implications of simultaneous oncoplastic reduction with lumpectomy on complication rates, time to adjuvant radiation therapy, and rates of margin re-excision compared to lumpectomy alone. Methods: The Clinformatics® Data Mart Database is a national deidentified commercial claims data warehouse. From 2003-2020, adult female patients were queried with International Classification of Disease (ICD-9 and ICD-10) codes to identify patients with a breast cancer diagnosis. Among those, common procedural terminology (CPT) codes were used to identify those who underwent lumpectomy alone versus lumpectomy with oncoplastic reduction. Patient demographics, complications, adjuvant oncologic therapies, and need for re-excision were recorded. Patients who were not continuously enrolled for at least six months before and after the index procedure were excluded. Chi squared and multivariable regression tests were used for statistical analysis. Results: Of 53,165 patients meeting criteria (mean age 61.4 ± 11.6 years), 1,552 (2.9%) underwent oncoplastic reduction. Diagnoses of most non-surgical complications (seroma, wound dehiscence, postoperative infection, fat necrosis, tissue necrosis, and non-specified complications of surgical care) were significantly higher in the oncoplastic reduction group, as were rates of some complications requiring surgical intervention (hematoma, seroma, and tissue debridement). However, undergoing oncoplastic reduction did not have an impact on time to adjuvant radiation (p=0.187) and protected against positive margins requiring repeat lumpectomy or completion mastectomy (p less than 0.001). Conclusion: In patients undergoing breast conservation therapy, simultaneous oncoplastic reduction decreased occurrence of positive margins and did not impact time to adjuvant radiation therapy, despite increased rates of surgical and non-surgical complications.

A real-world experience of TCH (docetaxel/carboplatin/trastuzumab) regimen in early, locally advanced and oligometastatic HER2 positive breast cancer from tertiary care center in North India.

e12505 Background: In HER2 positive breast cancer, TCH is a safe and efficacious anthracycline free regimen used as both adjuvant and neoadjuvant modality. Three is scarcity of data regarding its long term safety and efficacy from India. Methods: This retrospective study comprised of 210HER2 positive breast cancer female patients treated with TCH [docetaxel (75mg/m2), carboplatin (AUC=6) and trastuzumab (8mg/kg loading followed by 6mg/kg) q 21 days with GSF prophylaxis] protocol for 6 cycles at our centre between Jan 2014 and Dec 2021. All eligible patients received maintenance trastuzumab, hormonal therapy and radiotherapy as per institutional protocol. The information regarding baseline clinico-demographic characteristics, treatment details, outcomes and toxicities were collected and evaluated. Results: The median age was 49 years (23-72), 113 (53.8%) were post-menopausal and 100 (47.6%) were Estrogen receptor/Progesterone receptor positive. Sixty-eight (32.4%) patients were stage I and II, 112 (53.3%) stage III and 30 (14.3%) were oligometastatic. TCH regimen was given as neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in 130 (61.9%) patients and as adjuvant chemotherapy in 80 (38.1%) patients. Of the patients receiving NACT, 114 (87.6%) patients underwent surgery. Twenty-two (19.3%) patients underwent breast conservation surgery and 92 (80.7%) underwent modified radical mastectomy. Over the study period, 62 (29.5%) patients had progression of the disease and 22 (10.5%) patients died. With a median follow up of 31.9 months, 3-year disease free survival (DFS) was 63.5% and overall survival (OS) was 90.8%. Median DFS was 31 months in patients with node positive disease and was not reached in patients with node positive disease. Of the patients who received NACT, pathologic complete response (pCR) was recorded in 42 (36.8%) patients. Three-year DFS was 59.1% in patients who achieved pCR and 44.8% in those who did not achieve pCR. Any grade 3/4 toxicity was seen in 26.7% patients which caused dose modification in 13.9% patients. The most common grade 3/4 hematological toxicity was anemia (15.1%) and thrombocytopenia (10.4%), while non-hematological toxicity was diarrhea (11.6%). Febrile neutropenia was seen in 4 (1.9%) patients. Four patients (1.9%) had reversible decrease in cardiac left ventricular ejection fraction. Conclusions: Anthracycline free TCH regimen is an effective and safe regimen for use in curative (adjuvant and neoadjuvant) setting for HER2 positive breast cancer in Indian women with outcomes comparable to the anthracycline based regimens reported in literature.

Margex (margin re-excision experience): The impact of margin re-excision. Study protocol

Background: Breast conserving surgery provides equivalent oncologic outcomes to mastectomy for early breast cancer. In 2016, the National Margins Audit prospectively audited margin re-excision rates in 2858 patients undergoing breast conservation in the UK and Ireland. The margin re-excision rate was 17.2%. Minimalising adverse outcomes, their sequela of events and subsequent negative patient experience is paramount. The NHS Cancer Strategy has emphasised the need to equally prioritise improving cancer patient experience with improving clinical outcomes.

249P Significance of intraoperative frozen assessment of cavity shave margins in patients undergoing breast conservation surgery: A tertiary care centre experience

Breast conservation surgery (BCS) is the preferred surgical treatment modality for eligible breast cancer patients. Oncological safety and aesthetic outcomes remain the primary objective of breast conservation surgery. Positive margin status following BCS needs revision surgery, which leads to increased patient anxiety, cost of treatment and delay in start of adjuvant treatment. We evaluated the significance and accuracy of intraoperative frozen section assessment of cavity shave margins (IOFSA) in patients undergoing BCS.

A comparison of timely completion of hypofractionated and traditional adjuvant radiation therapy in early-stage breast cancer: Evidence of impact on reducing racial and socioeconomic disparities

BackgroundTimely completion of adjuvant radiation after breast conservation therapy is associated with decreased mortality and increased disease-free survival. Few data exist comparing timely completion between hypofractionated radiation and traditional radiation at a national level or across racial and socioeconomic cohorts. MethodsA retrospective review of the National Cancer Database (2012–2016) on patients undergoing breast conservation therapy for early-stage breast cancer, specifically T1 or T2, N0, M0 patients, was performed. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to compare timely completion of hypofractionated radiation (within 5 weeks of initiation) and traditional radiation (within 7 weeks) across patient, tumor, and facility characteristics. ResultsIn total, 210,816 patients met criteria, with 59.4% receiving traditional radiation (n = 125,140) and 40.6% receiving hypofractionated radiation (n = 85,676). Overall, 82.8% of patients achieved timely completion of radiation. Among hypofractionated radiation patients, 94.5% of patients achieved timely completion, whereas only 74.8% of traditional radiation patients achieved timely completion (P < .0001). Regarding race/ethnicity, all groups benefited substantially in timely completion of hypofractionated radiation over traditional radiation. However, both treatment cohorts demonstrated that Black (odds ratio (hypofractionated radiation) = 0.842, odds ratio (traditional radiation) = 0.821) and Hispanic (odds ratio (hypofractionated radiation) = 0.917, odds ratio (traditional radiation) = 0.907) patients had lower odds of timely completion compared to White patients (P < .0001). Lower high school graduation rate, median income for patients’ ZIP code, and Medicaid were also associated with lower odds of timely completion for both hypofractionated radiation and traditional radiation (both P < .0001). ConclusionTimely completion of radiation therapy in breast conservation therapy is greater for patients receiving hypofractionated radiation than traditional radiation across racial and socioeconomic cohorts. Disparities in timely completion were substantially reduced with hypofractionated radiation utilization. However, there are treatment disparities across racial and socioeconomic cohorts that persist in both treatment groups.

Abstract P3-03-20: The association of preoperative MRI with surgical decision-making in patients with early-stage breast cancer: A multi-institutional analysis

Abstract Background: Lumpectomy with radiation (breast conservation) and mastectomy have equivalent overall survival. However, recent studies suggest that patients undergoing breast conservation have lower rates of recurrence compared to those undergoing mastectomy. A 2013 meta-analysis by Houssami, et al. found that the rate of mastectomy in patients who had preoperative MRI was 16%, twice as high as that in patients who did not have preoperative MRI. A multi-institutional analysis was performed to investigate the possible impact of modern MRI on the surgical management of early-stage breast cancer (ESBC). Methods: A retrospective comparative cohort study included patients with in-situ and invasive breast cancer eligible for breast conservation surgery from two institutions (NY and FL). Patients who received preoperative systemic therapy were excluded. Eligibility for breast conservation was defined as clinical stage Tis-2. Risk factors for the bilateral or multicentric disease were compared between the two groups including breast density, menopausal status, and concerning family history. The rate of ipsilateral mastectomy in lumpectomy-eligible women was compared between patients who did and did not receive preoperative MRI. Chi-square analysis was used to compare rates between groups. P values &amp;lt;0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results: 505 patients diagnosed between 1/2016-4/2019 (NY) and 2/2020-12/2020 (FL) underwent primary surgery for ESBC. 434 did not receive neoadjuvant therapy and were included in the analysis. 292 (67.3%) had preoperative MRI. There was no difference in the proportion of patients who were premenopausal or who met the criteria for genetic testing by family history. The largest dimension on preoperative imaging was similar between the two groups. Patients who had MRI were younger (median age 58 vs. 68, p&amp;lt;0.001) and more likely to have group 3 or 4 breast density (64.5% vs. 27.1%, p&amp;lt;0.001). Patients who underwent preoperative MRI were twice as likely to undergo mastectomy as their first surgery (32.6% vs. 15.3%, p&amp;lt;0.001). The rate of re-excision was similar between the two groups (MRI 13.0% vs. no MRI 10.8% p=0.511). Of note, the final pathologic size of the invasive or in-situ component was similar between the two groups (Table 1). Conclusion: Younger age and greater breast density are associated with preoperative MRI receipt and all three factors likely play a role in choosing mastectomy. Young women with dense breasts represent a unique cohort of patients that may be particularly susceptible to cancer-related worry and anxiety related to additional biopsies, and therefore may be more likely to opt against continued breast imaging. Since approximately 70% of patients with ESBC undergo preoperative MRI, future work should focus on mitigating these challenges to improve shared decision-making. Table 1.Comparison of ESBC Patients Who Did and Did Not Receive MRIMRI (n=292) %, median (IQR)No MRI (n=142)%, median (IQR)p-valueAge58 years (50-65)68 years (60-76)&amp;lt;0.001bPremenopausal27%21%0.108Dense Breasts65%27%&amp;lt;0.001bMeet Criteria for Genetic Testing40%38%0.207Imaging Size13 mm (9-21)12 mm (8-20)0.315Mastectomy as First Surgery33%15%&amp;lt;0.001bPlan for Repeat Surgerya20%24%0.402Re-excision13%11%0.511Pathologic Size (Invasive)13 mm (8-20)13 mm (9-22)0.482Pathologic Size (DCIS)10 mm (5-20)8 mm (3-15)0.093aRepeat surgery includes re-excision, completion mastectomy, and axillary dissectionbDenotes significant p-values. Citation Format: Peter A Borowsky, Seraphina Choi, Orly Morgan, Amy K White, Claudya Morin, Jose Net, Susan Kesmodel, Neha Goel, Yamini Patel, Alexa Griffiths, Joshua A Feinberg, Aaron Kangas-Dick, Charusheela Andaz, Christina Giuliano, Natalie Zelenko, Donna-Marie Manasseh, Patrick Borgen, Kristin E Rojas. The association of preoperative MRI with surgical decision-making in patients with early-stage breast cancer: A multi-institutional analysis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-03-20.