Patient Beliefs Research Articles

Exploring self-care health-related beliefs, values and attitudes with older patients.

Person-centred care is based on the notion that patients' independence and dignity is sustained during the care planning process. Negotiating person-centred care with the older person involves exploring their self-care beliefs, values and attitudes. This article discusses patient beliefs, values and attitudes in the context of self-care and suggests ways in which nurses might explore these as a collaborative enquiry. The author also describes the use of a simple reflective framework as a starting point for engaging in this exploration.

The Roles of Understanding and Belief in Prognostic Awareness.

Conventional understanding and research regarding prognostic understanding too often focuses on transmission of information. However, merely overcoming barriers to patient understanding may not be sufficient. In this article the authors provide a more nuanced understanding of prognostic awareness, using oncological care as an overarching example, and discuss factors that may lead to prognostic discordance between physicians and patients. We summarize the current literature and research and present a model developed by the authors to characterize barriers to prognostic awareness. Ultimately, multiple influences on prognostic understanding may impede acceptance by patients even when adequate transfer of information takes place. Physicians should improve how they transmit prognostic information, as this information may be processed in different ways. A model of misunderstandings in awareness, ranging from patient understanding to patient belief, may be useful to guide future discussions. Future decision-making studies should consider these many variables so that interventions may be created to address all aspects of the prognostic disclosure process.

Một số đặc điểm về tuân thủ sử dụng thuốc kháng động kinh của người bệnh động kinh tại Trung tâm Thần kinh Bệnh viện Bạch Mai

Epilepsy is a common disease, affecting about 65 million people in the world, accounting for 1% of the global burden of disease. Many aspects are affected such as: Economic, social and especially the quality of life. Some researches have shown that the quality of life of people with epilepsy is much lower than that of healthy people. Treatment of epilepsy is necessary. However, epilepsy treatment is difficult with a high rate of seizure recurrence. One of the important causes of seizure recurrence is the medication non-adherence that even making the disease more difficult to control. Objective: Describe the characteristics of medication adherence in epilepsy patients at the Bach Mai neurology center and analyze some related factors. Subjects and methods: Cross-sectional descriptive study on patients who were diagnosed and treated for outpatient epilepsy, came for follow-up examination at the neurology center of Bạch Mai hospital. Patient classification based on medication adherence characteristics and patients beliefs about drug use, through MMAS-8 scale and BMQ scale. Results: Out of 193 patients, 80.5% of them often had difficulty remembering to take medication, 11.4% felt bothered when adhering to treatment. 0% of patients achieved a high level of compliance, 27.5% at average level and 72.5% at low level). Conclusion: The majority of patients have a moderate level of knowledge about epilepsy, with most of them understanding that epilepsy can be cured, the available treatment methods, and the necessity of adhering to medication. However, they also recognize the serious issue of using stimulants. Despite this, none of the patients achieved a high level of adherence, with most showing low adherence to treatment, primarily due to occasionally forgetting to take their medication.

The Potential of Artificial Intelligence Tools for Reducing Uncertainty in Medicine and Directions for Medical Education.

In the field of medicine, uncertainty is inherent. Physicians are asked to make decisions on a daily basis without complete certainty, whether it is in understanding the patient's problem, performing the physical examination, interpreting the findings of diagnostic tests, or proposing a management plan. The reasons for this uncertainty are widespread, including the lack of knowledge about the patient, individual physician limitations, and the limited predictive power of objective diagnostic tools. This uncertainty poses significant problems in providing competent patient care. Research efforts and teaching are attempts to reduce uncertainty that have now become inherent to medicine. Despite this, uncertainty is rampant. Artificial intelligence (AI) tools, which are being rapidly developed and integrated into practice, may change the way we navigate uncertainty. In their strongest forms, AI tools may have the ability to improve data collection on diseases, patient beliefs, values, and preferences, thereby allowing more time for physician-patient communication. By using methods not previously considered, these tools hold the potential to reduce the uncertainty in medicine, such as those arising due to the lack of clinical information and provider skill and bias. Despite this possibility, there has been considerable resistance to the implementation of AI tools in medical practice. In this viewpoint article, we discuss the impact of AI on medical uncertainty and discuss practical approaches to teaching the use of AI tools in medical schools and residency training programs, including AI ethics, real-world skills, and technological aptitude.

Adherence to Systemic Therapy for Atopic Dermatitis in Adult Patients in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease that significantly impacts both pediatrics and adults. Despite the availability and proven efficacy of systemic medications, there remains a critical issue of non-adherence among patients. This study aimed to assess adherence to systemic therapy among Saudi adult patients with AD. The study employed a cross-sectional study with an online questionnaire that was distributed among a convenience sample of 1,154 adult patients with AD in Saudi Arabia. In addition to descriptive statistical analysis, Pearson's correlation and chi-squared tests were used to determine the correlations between adherence to systemic therapy for AD and its predictable factors. AD was diagnosed over five years in 61.3% of the participants. The vast majority of those diagnosed with AD (73%) were prescribed systemic medications, with a moderate level of adherence to this therapy. While adherence to systemic therapy significantly correlated with improved quality of life, factors including forgetfulness, side effect concerns, patient's belief in medication importance, disease severity, and medication complexity impacted adherence to this mode of therapy. Factors including patient's belief in medication importance, disease severity, and medication complexity impacted adherence. The findings of this study highlight the need for multifaceted interventions to improve adherence to systemic therapy for AD. Addressing patient concerns about the use of systemic therapy for AD and reinforcing the importance of medication use for long-term disease management and quality-of-life improvement is recommended to explore the barriers to adherence and enhance compliance to systemic therapy in this population.

Doxycycline as Post-Exposure Prophylaxis: Awareness, Beliefs, and Interest Among Patients with and at Risk for HIV.

Recent studies have demonstrated the efficacy of doxycycline as post-exposure prophylaxis (doxy-PEP) for sexually transmitted infection (STI) prevention, but little is known regarding patient beliefs and interest in doxy-PEP. We conducted a cross-sectional survey of adults (≥ 19 years) receiving care for HIV treatment (PWH) or prevention (pre-exposure prophylaxis, PrEP) between May-October 2023. The 32-question survey was organized into three parts: doxy-PEP awareness/beliefs/interest/concerns, sexual history, and demographics. Fishers Exact and Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to compare responses between groups. Multivariate logistic regression identified predictive factors for doxy-PEP interest and concern(s). 166 participants completed the survey. Mean age was 43 years, 83% were male, 22% Black, and 13% Hispanic. Forty-one participants (25%) were on PrEP. Most respondents (75%) were unaware of doxy-PEP. Factors associated with doxy-PEP interest were respondents prescribed PrEP (aOR 2.67; 95% CI, 1.15-6.21) and belief of high risk for STI (aOR, 4.50; 95% CI, 2.24-9.07). Higher doxy-PEP concerns were associated with age ≤40 years (aOR, 3.10; 95% CI, 1.47-6.52), > high school education (aOR, 3.47; 95% CI, 1.64-7.33), and belief of high risk for STI (aOR, 2.58; 95% CI, 1.21-5.50). In this single-site cohort survey study, most respondents were unaware of doxy-PEP but expressed interest and low levels of overall concern. Clinicians should offer doxy-PEP access to all patients at high risk for STIs or requesting the treatment after shared decision-making discussions.

"The medicine is not something that interests me at all." Beliefs, health-related behaviors, and medication adherence in patients with symptomatic peripheral arterial disease

Abstract Background Despite evidence-based guidelines recommending secondary prevention with antithrombotics and lipid-lowering therapies, adherence to optimal pharmacological therapies remains suboptimal in patients with symptomatic lower extremity peripheral arterial disease (PAD), potentially contributing to excess morbidity and mortality. However, the behavioral factors and health beliefs underlying this behavior are still poorly understood. Purpose To explore the health-related behaviors and beliefs of patients with symptomatic PAD regarding secondary preventive therapy. Methods Using a qualitative design, we conducted individual semi-structured interviews with patients diagnosed with symptomatic PAD. Participants were recruited from four departments of vascular surgery in Denmark from December 2022 to January 2024. Data analysis was performed using framework analysis based on the six domains of the Health Belief Models1 (HBM) as analytical framework: perceived susceptibility, severity, benefits, barriers, cues to action, and self-efficacy. The HBM is widely used for conceptualizing individual’s attitudes and beliefs to explain and predict health behaviours. Results Sixteen patients participated in the study: seven adherent and nine non-adherent patients. Based on the HBM components, the following findings emerged (Figure 1). Patients expressed low perceived awareness of the severity of PAD and its potential consequences, not recognizing PAD as a systemic condition associated with broader cardiovascular risk. The perception of PAD centered around the experience of excruciating leg pain and its impact on everyday life. This focus on symptoms affected the perceived benefits of secondary preventive therapies. Patients lacked knowledge about the importance and goal of treatment and did not link the secondary preventive therapy to PAD, often associating it only with other cardiovascular diseases. Barriers included inadequate understanding of the chronic progressive nature of PAD and its severity, experience and fear of side-effects, prescription confusion, pill burden, financial constraints, and allergies. Fear of recurring pain, complications, and early death served as strong internal adherence triggers. Paradoxically, despite expressing fear, some patients were only adherent to antithrombotic therapy, not assigning the same importance to statins. Other cues to action included practical arrangements as well as establishing a trusting patient-provider relationship and receiving comprehensive and logical explanations. Conclusions This study provided new perspectives on the multifaceted challenges hindering adherence to secondary preventive therapy among patients with symptomatic PAD. Notably, the insufficient knowledge regarding the chronic progressive nature of PAD and its cardiovascular implications, underscores the need for enhanced patient education and tailored interventions to ensure optimal secondary preventive therapy.Figure 1

The knowledge, attitude and practice of cardiologists versus other specialists about the safety and efficacy of influenza vaccination in patients with cardiovascular diseases

Abstract Background Influenza vaccination has been shown to reduce the occurrence of cardiovascular events, both in the general population and especially in individuals with cardiovascular disease. However, the extent to which cardiologists and other physicians support and prescribe influenza vaccination for patients with cardiovascular diseases is not known. Purpose To explore cardiologists' and other specialists' opinions on the safety and efficacy of influenza vaccination in preventing cardiovascular events. Methods From September 2023 to February 2024, a survey was conducted among physicians of any specialty, following the Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES). The survey was available in 5 languages. Participants' opinions were assessed using Likert-type scales. Non-probabilistic convenience sampling was employed, and duplicated responses were prevented using the SurveyMonkey® platform that identifies duplicated IP addresses. Results A total of 2550 physicians from 44 countries answered the survey; the mean age was 46.1±13.1 years, 46.4% were women, and 17.1% were in training. Among respondents 43.6% were cardiologists. While 91.8% of participants considered the influenza vaccine to be very safe, and 90.6% believed that adverse effects of this intervention were rare, a significant proportion did not consider Influenza vaccine to be very beneficial in reducing acute myocardial infarction (54.4% for cardiologists vs 59.3% for other specialists, p=0.013) or stroke (62.2% for cardiologists vs 64.9% for other specialists, p=0.167). summarizes the participants’ opinions regarding the benefits and risks of influenza vaccination. Regarding potential barriers to achieving higher vaccination rates among patients with cardiovascular disease, cardiologists' opinions were similar to those of other specialists (Table 2). Patient beliefs and patients’ fear of vaccine-related adverse effects were identified as major barriers by both cardiologists and other specialists. Only 19.0% of participants reported having some type of checklist system to remind them to recommend the vaccine to their patients. While 73.0% of participants found this topic highly relevant to their daily clinical practice, with no differences between groups (p=0.178), a notable proportion, comprising 48.5% of cardiologists and 47.1% of other specialists, expressed the necessity for additional training to address the risk-benefit ratio of influenza vaccination with their patients (p=0.485). Conclusion Our data suggest that cardiologists and other specialists view the influenza vaccine as safe with a low rate of adverse effects, both in the general population and in individuals with cardiovascular disease. However, a significant proportion of them are unaware of the vaccination's benefit in reducing cardiovascular events. Additionally, about half of the surveyed professionals expressed a need for further education to discuss the benefits of vaccination with their patients.

Why do older adults stop cancer screening? Findings from the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey.

Prostate and breast cancer screening are prevalent among older adults, even among those unlikely to benefit. We aimed to evaluate why older adults stop cancer screening, including the role of physician recommendations. We used nationally representative data from the 2019 Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey (MCBS). We included women aged 76 and older without a history of breast cancer and men aged 71 and older without a history of prostate cancer. The primary outcome was reason for discontinuing screening, categorized as follows: (1) physician recommendation against screening; (2) absence of a recommendation to screen; and (3) patient-driven reason, such as patient preferences or beliefs. We evaluated reasons for screening discontinuation by health status and educational attainment using age-stratified multinomial logistic regression. The sample included 7350 participants representing a weighted population of 22,498,715. Overall, 53% of women underwent screening mammography in the past year or intended to continue screening. Among those who stopped screening, 5% reported a recommendation to stop screening from their doctor, 48% reported no recommendation, and 32% reported a patient-driven reason for cessation. Findings did not differ by educational attainment or health status, including among the oldest patients. For men, 61% were screened with PSA in the past year or intended to continue. Among those who stopped, 3% reported a recommendation against screening, 54% reported no recommendation, and 27% reported a patient-driven reason for cessation. Men with higher educational attainment were more likely to report that their physician recommended against screening (4% vs. 1%, p = 0.01) and that their doctor did not recommend screening (58% vs. 47%, p = 0.01). Reasons for screening cessation did not differ by health status, including among the oldest patients. Cancer screening remains common, even among those with limited potential for benefit, but discussions around screening cessation are rare. Improving communication between patients and physicians may improve screening decision quality.

Healthcare professionals beliefs and priorities for the rehabilitation of patients after ankle fracture surgery: A qualitative study

ObjectiveThe study aims to understand healthcare professionals’ (HCPs) beliefs and practices in the treatment and rehabilitation of patients after ankle fracture surgery, with the goal of informing new rehabilitation interventions based on these insights. BackgroundThere is considerable variation in postoperative rehabilitation advice given to patients with ankle fractures, leading to inconsistent care. Prior studies have primarily focused on patients' experiences, making it crucial to explore HCPs' perspectives to identify areas for intervention. MethodsThe study utilised semi-structured interviews with HCPs involved in the multicentre randomised controlled Weightbearing in Ankle Fractures (WAX) trial. Interviewees included physiotherapists, consultant trauma and orthopaedic surgeons, and trainee surgeons. Interviews were conducted between February 2020 and December 2021. Data were analysed using a mixed deductive and inductive approach, aligning with the Behavioural Change Wheel framework to translate findings into potential intervention strategies. Results18 Interviews were conducted, revealing discrepancies between patient and HCP beliefs about recovery, particularly regarding weight-bearing and managing physical symptoms like swelling and numbness. HCPs expressed varying beliefs on the safety of early weight-bearing and recognised historical practice and medicolegal concerns influencing rehabilitation advice. Themes highlighted the need for clearer communication, standardised advice, and the impact of HCPs' remarks on patients' recovery confidence. ConclusionsFindings underscore the mismatch between patient expectations and HCP guidance, emphasising the need for consensus on rehabilitation protocols. The study advocates for tailored rehabilitation pathways that address individual patient recovery trajectories, reduce dependency on HCPs, and encourage patient self-management.

What patients with kidney stones believe about their condition.

Patients' beliefs about their illness are of central importance in understanding how a person adjusts to their condition and adheres to self-management recommendations. No previous studies have set out to quantitatively examine Illness beliefs in patients with kidney stones (KS). 112 patients with radiological confirmation of KS (59% male, mean (x̄) age = 50.1 years [sd14.15 years], 50.5% previous surgical treatment) attending for clinical consultation completed the Brief-Illness Perception Questionnaire alongside a range of demographic and illness related variables. Template analysis was undertaken on the free text responses of patients' beliefs about what had caused their KS. Almost a third (31.2%) of patients did not know what had caused their KS. Of those who cited a cause, dietary factors, fluid intake, medical risk factors (e.g. Inflammatory bowel disease), genetics, and psychological factors were ranked as the most important. Patients generally believed they had a reasonable understanding of KS (x̄=6.32 [sd3.21]), but reported poor levels of personal control over their KS (x̄=2.90 [sd2.93]) and high confidence in the effectiveness of treatments (x̄=8.64 [sd1.90]). Patients with a recurrence believed KS had a significantly greater impact on their life (z=-2.56, p = 0.01) and had greater emotional consequences (z=-2.77, p < 0.01). Perceptions of poor personal control over KS and a strong belief in medical/surgical treatment was evident regardless of first or recurrent stone, gender, age, previous surgical management of KS or time since diagnosis. Results highlight the need to actively increase patients' perceptions of personal control in the management and prevention of KS.

Effect of chiropractic care on low back pain for active-duty military members: Mediation through biopsychosocial factors.

This study evaluates biopsychosocial factors as mediators of the effect of chiropractic care on low back pain (LBP) intensity and interference for active-duty military members. Data from a multi-site, pragmatic clinical trial comparing six weeks of chiropractic care plus usual medical care to usual medical care alone for 750 US active-duty military members with LBP were analyzed using natural-effect, multiple-mediator modeling. Mediation of the adjusted mean effect difference on 12-week outcomes of PROMIS-29 pain interference and intensity by 6-week mediators of other PROMIS-29 physical, mental, and social health subdomains was evaluated. The effect difference on pain interference occurring through PROMIS-29 biopsychosocial factors (natural indirect effect = -1.59, 95% CI = -2.28 to -0.88) was 56% (95% CI = 35 to 96) of the total effect (-2.82, 95% CI = -3.98 to -1.53). The difference in effect on pain intensity occurring through biopsychosocial factors was smaller (natural indirect effect = -0.32, 95% CI = -0.50 to -0.18), equaling 26% (95% CI = 15 to 42) of the total effect (-1.23, 95% CI = -1.52 to -0.88). When considered individually, all physical, mental, and social health factors appeared to mediate the effect difference on pain interference and pain intensity with mental health factors having smaller effect estimates. In contrast with effects on pain interference, much of the effect of adding chiropractic care to usual medical care for US military members on pain intensity did not appear to occur through the PROMIS-29 biopsychosocial factors. Physical and social factors appear to be important intermediate measures for patients receiving chiropractic care for low back pain in military settings. Further study is needed to determine if the effect of chiropractic care on pain intensity for active-duty military occurs through other unmeasured factors, such as patient beliefs, or if the effect occurs directly.

Exploring cannabis information and perceptions of cannabis harms among patients with cancer.

361 Background: Cannabis use is rising among both the general and cancer populations. While the impact of cannabis on cancer care remains unclear, many patients who use cannabis report improvement in their cancer-related symptoms. However, little is known about the potential impact of cannabis on cancer development and treatment outcomes. Understanding patient beliefs about cannabis risks and their awareness of information about cannabis use may be important for future patient education. Here, we explored patient perceptions of harms and information-seeking habits on cannabis. Methods: Patients with cancer were recruited across outpatient ambulatory clinics at the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (Toronto, Canada) through convenience sampling from July to August 2023. A one-time, paper-based, self-administered questionnaire was used to assess sociodemographic characteristics, perceptions of cannabis harms, and awareness of cannabis information. Multivariable regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with perceptions of cannabis use. Results: Among 243 participants, median age was 65 years, 45% reported lifetime cannabis use (12% were using cannabis at the time of survey), 50% were cigarette smokers, 62% were not employed full-time, and 77% spoke English as a primary language at home. Half (51%) of the participants reported being worried about the potential impacts of cannabis on their health. Current tobacco users (aOR=0.46 [0.19-1.07], p=0.07), primary English speakers at home (aOR=0.53 [0.28-1.01], p=0.06) and those not currently employed (aOR=0.57 [0.33-0.99], p=0.04) were less worried about the effect of cannabis on their health. Despite the perceived harms of cannabis, 84% of participants never sought cannabis-related information, while 40% wanted to know more about the influence of cannabis on cancer risk and treatment. Furthermore, Most (90%) participants reported never having discussed cannabis with their oncologists, but 93% felt it was important for healthcare providers to ask patients about cannabis use. Conclusions: Many patients with cancer are worried about the impact of cannabis on their health and want to know more about cannabis use in cancer care. Most patients report it is important for healthcare providers to have discussions about cannabis use. With the rising prevalence of cannabis use among patients with cancer, validated tools to assess cannabis use and cannabis-related educational resources specific to cancer risk and treatment outcomes should be explored to help address informational needs.

Implications of genetic attributions for addiction among addiction professionals

Given increasing emphasis on understanding the role of genes in the etiology of addictive disorders, the present study aimed to investigate the implications of genetic explanations of addiction for attitudes and beliefs about patients among addiction treatment providers. Participants were recruited from addiction-related professional organizations. The sample included professionals with medical backgrounds (n = 153) and with nonmedical backgrounds (n = 232). They viewed a description of a fictitious patient with either alcohol use disorder or gambling disorder, which was experimentally varied to indicate the presence or absence of a genetic cause. They completed measures of their genetic attributions for the patient's symptoms as well as their attitudes and beliefs about the patient. The presence of a genetic explanation increased genetic attribution ratings but did not significantly affect other measured variables. However, participants' genetic attributions for the patient's symptoms were associated with significantly lower ascriptions of blame to the patient and greater belief in the effectiveness of medication, but also with reduced confidence in the effectiveness of psychotherapy and with pessimism about the patient's prognosis. Geneticized, biomedical conceptualizations of addiction may have implications for treatment providers' attitudes toward patients.

Patients’ reasons for consulting a general practitioner at the time of having dental problems: a qualitative study

IntroductionMany patients consult general practitioners instead of dentists for their oral and dental problems every year. This study aims to find the reasons why patients consult general practitioners when they have dental problems.MethodsThe sample consisted of patients visiting dentists and general practitioners in Kerman, Iran. A thematic interview guide, semi-structured questions, and a mind map that allowed for structured and open-ended questions were prepared and used for the interviews. All interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim by a final-year student. Data collection, transcription, and analysis were conducted simultaneously to allow for new topics to be raised and theoretical saturation to be reached. When researchers determined that sufficient information was available for analysis and understanding of patient opinions and beliefs, the interview process was stopped. As all audio conversations were recorded with the participant’s permission, no note-taking was done during the interviews, which allowed for greater focus on the participants’ conversation. The obtained data was analyzed using the content analysis.ResultsA total of 52 patients were included in this study. The codes related to patients participating in this research, along with the number of respondent groups related to each code were as follows: patient’s perceptions of general practitioner(GP) and dental practitioner’s scope of work [21], flawed dental system (34), dental anxiety [28], financial considerations [25], and more accessibility to GPs (31). Dental abscesses and dental pain were reported as the most common reasons for consulting GPs.ConclusionMost participants agreed that dental problems are more effectively treated by dentists. Reasons for visiting a general practitioner included lack of a specific dentist, dissatisfaction with dental treatments, lack of a dentist nearby, absence of emergency dental care, and familiarity with a physician. The most common reasons for visits were toothache and dental abscesses. Patients also sought treatment for TMJ pain, referred nerve pain, wisdom tooth pain, numbness and tingling in the jaw, gum inflammation, oral lesions, and ulcers. Furthermore, other factors such as opening hours, appointment systems and waiting time can also affect patient’s consult behaviors regarding dental problems.

Factors Associated with Corticosteroid Adherence in Sarcoidosis.

We measured corticosteroid medication adherence (CMA) in sarcoidosis patients and analyzed if demographic and clinical factors, beliefs about medications, corticosteroid side-effects, psychosocial status, and the doctor-patient relationship were associated with corticosteroid adherence. Sarcoidosis patients receiving corticosteroids were eligible to participate. CMA was measured using the Medication Adherence Response Scale-10 (MARS-10), a validated patient reported outcome measure (PRO). Data collection included patient demographics and clinical variables to assess their sarcoidosis phenotype. The patients were administered additional PROs concerning their psychosocial status, beliefs about medication use, corticosteroid side-effects and the strength of their doctor-patient relationship. 132 patients were enrolled. Their mean prednisone dose was 9.9 ± 7.5mg/day. 75% (99/132) were adherent with corticosteroids (MARS-10 ≥ 6) and 25% (33/132) were nonadherent (MARS-10 < 6). All demographic features, education level, and annual family income were not associated with CMA. Most clinical variables including spirometry, use of additional sarcoidosis drugs, number of organs involved with sarcoidosis were not associated with CMA. Almost all PROs including a better attitude toward medication use, less psychological issues, less corticosteroid side-effects, and a stronger doctor-patient relationship were associated with better CMA. A multi-logistic regression found that patient-doctor communication and the patient's intrinsic beliefs about the use of medications remained associated with CMA. We found no significant relationship between demographic or socioeconomic factors and CMA. Few clinical factors were associated with CMA. In a univariate analysis, CMA was associated with physician-doctor communication, beliefs about medication use, psychological/emotional issues, and corticosteroid side-effects. Only the first two of these factors remained associated with CMA in a multi-logistic analysis. These data suggest that CMA is heavily influenced by sarcoidosis patient beliefs about medications, and less so by patient demographics.

Patients' experience of telehealth clinics during the COVID-19 pandemic: Cross-sectional study.

Globally, the Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic in 2019 has accelerated the adoption of telehealth technologies. The implementation of the Saudi Telemedicine Network (STN) and other digital health initiatives, such as the telehealth clinic (THC) at King Abdullah bin Abdulaziz University Hospital (KAAUH), exemplifies this trend in Saudi Arabia. The aim of this study was to explore the patients' experience of THC in KAAUH during the COVID-19 pandemic and their' beliefs about their readiness to replace the traditional onsite clinical visits with THC from March to September 2020. A cross-sectional study targeted all 1398 patients who utilized THC at KAAUH. A self-administrated, validated survey collected the data. The survey used a Likert scale and included questions on satisfaction with THC services and the perceived effectiveness of telehealth as a substitute for in-person visits. The collected data was analyzed using frequency and percentage. A total of 252 patients responded to the THC postvisit survey. Overall, 217 patients (86%) were satisfied, 32 patients (13%) were dissatisfied, and only 3 patients (1%) were neutral about THC. Most patients (65.5%) agree that THC provided enough information about their health conditions, which can substitute for clinical visits. About 18.3% of patients were neutral, while 16.3% disagreed with the effectiveness of THC services and believed that they could not replace onsite visits. During the COVID-19 pandemic, most patients were satisfied at KAAUH-THC in Saudi Arabia and believed that it could replace the onsite visit to a physician's clinic. The 2 main causes of the patient's belief that THC could not replace an onsite clinical visit were: First, nonadherence to appointments led to missed calls and a complete medical service. Second, the patient's perception is that a physical examination and lab investigation cannot be completed through THC.

Factors associated with dietary practices and beliefs on food of patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases: A multicentre cross-sectional study

ObjectivesTo investigate dietary practices and beliefs of patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs) and associated factors. MethodsIn 2019–2020, a cross-sectional multicentre study enrolled patients with inflammatory arthritis (IA) (rheumatoid arthritis [RA], axial spondyloarthritis [axSpA]) or hand osteoarthritis (HOA) from secondary- and tertiary-care centres. A self-administered questionnaire explored dietary practices and patients’ perceived effects of diet, foods and beverages on symptoms. Univariable and multivariable analyses investigated factors associated with diets and patients’ views. ResultsOf 448 included patients, data for 392 were analysed (123 with RA, 161 with axSpA, 108 with HOA), 26% were on or had been on at least one exclusion diet (mostly cow's milk- and gluten-free diets in IA, mostly cow's milk-free diet and detox/fasting in HOA). Only 5% of patients followed the Mediterranean diet. Among patients who had tried a diet, 51% reported a decrease in pain. Overall, 42% of patients identified at least one food or beverage that increased or decreased pain. On multivariable analyses, dieting or the perceived effect of food on pain was associated with health beliefs (positive or negative), the use of complementary and alternative medicines, and lack of support or information from healthcare professionals. Patients had received little dietary information from their physicians. ConclusionsThis study provides insights into patients’ dietary practices and factors associated with these practices, including patients’ health beliefs and insufficient support by health professionals, in RMDs.

Beliefs of Moroccan patients with chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases regarding medication: related factors and correlation with therapeutic adherence

BackgroundMedication adherence is one of the key elements of the management of patients with chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases (CIRDs), adherence/medication regimes are prone to being influenced by beliefs about medicines; such beliefs can influence the management and quality of life of patients. Several factors may be associated with these beliefs, including demographic and clinical factors, as well as socio-psychological factors. The aim of this study is to assess beliefs regarding medications among Moroccan patients with CIRDs, the factors associated with these beliefs, and the correlation of these factors with medication adherence.Material and methodThis cross-sectional study included patients with CIRDs. Sociodemographic data, comorbidities, and information about CIRDs (type, disease duration, pain evaluation, disease activity and treatments) were collected. Beliefs regarding medication were assessed by the Belief about Medicine Questionnaire (BMQ). Therapeutic adherence was assessed using the Arabic version of the Compliance Questionnaire in Rheumatology (CQR). Sociopsychological factors, such as catastrophism and trust in physicians, were assessed by the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) and the Trust in Physicians Scale (TPS), respectively.ResultOur sample included 189 patients. The average age was 47.49 ± 13.7; 52.4% had comorbidities; and 49.2% had a low level of education. Of the patients, 49.7% were on glucocorticoids, 61.9% on conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and 6.3% on biologics. The median necessity-concern differential was 6 [1–12]. Of the patients, 67.4% strongly believed that medication was essential to maintain their health. The long-term side effects were the main concerns about medicines (51.3%). In a multivariate analysis, there was a statistically significant association between low level of education, catastrophizing, methotrexate use, and trust in the physician as independent factors and the BMQ necessity-concern differential as the dependent factor. There was also a significant correlation between CQR and the BMQ necessity score.ConclusionMoroccan patients with CIRDs have a rather positive perception of their medication. This perception seems to influence their adherence to treatment. Low levels of education, catastrophizing, methotrexate use, and trust in physicians are the most important factors associated with patients’ beliefs regarding medication.

Factors that influence vaccination communication during pregnancy: provider and patient perspectives using the theoretical domains framework.

Vaccination during pregnancy is recommended but uptake is low and evidence on the topic is limited. This study aimed to identify the drivers of current behavior and barriers to change for health care practitioners (HCPs) and pregnant patients in Canada. This study is an in-depth qualitative investigation of the factors influencing HCPs' vaccination communication during pregnancy, as well as factors influencing pregnant patients' vaccination uptake in Canada using the Theoretical Domains Framework. Three data sources were used: (1) perinatal HCP interviews before COVID-19; (2) perinatal HCP interviews regarding vaccine communication after COVID-19; and (3) survey of pregnant or lactating women after COVID-19. Forty-seven interviews and 169 participant responses were included. Perinatal HCPs reported limited information on vaccine communication or difficulty keeping up-to-date (Environmental context and resources; Knowledge; Beliefs about capabilities). HCPs lacked confidence and struggled with lack of training to address vaccine hesitancy without alienating patients (Beliefs about capabilities; Skills). Pregnant or lactating women struggled with the amount of information they felt was imposed on them, had concerns about the perceived negative consequences of vaccination, and felt pressure to understand what was best for them and their babies (Knowledge; Beliefs about consequences; Social influences). Our study provides a theory-based approach to identify influencing factors that can be mapped to theory-based intervention components, improving the likelihood of intervention effectiveness. The study is the first step in adapting an existing intervention to improve vaccine communication during pregnancy, ultimately, increasing vaccination uptake. http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A260.