Patient Withdrew Research Articles

Home self-testing of complete blood counts in patients with breast cancer during chemotherapy: A proof-of-concept cohort study in e-oncology.

Before administration of myelosuppressive chemotherapy, complete blood counts (CBC) collected at the hospital/nursing stations are evaluated to avoid severe bone marrow suppression. This maintains disease fixation which often reduces their quality of life. This mixed-method study examined at home self-testing of CBC, the test quality, and the effects on patients' mental well-being. Patients with breast cancer receiving chemotherapy were recruited and trained to perform capillary finger prick CBC testing at home using the HemoScreen Point-of-Care instrument and to upload the test results to the hospital's IT system subsequently. A venous reference CBC sample was taken and tested at the hospital on the day of self-testing. Semi-structured interviews with open-ended components were performed to investigate the user experience and the impact of self-testing on the patients' everyday lives. Thirty-nine patients completed the self-testing education using the HemoScreen instrument. Eight patients withdrew, while the remaining 31 patients performed 161 home tests (2-11 tests per patient) over a 4-month period. The test results compared well with the venous reference CBCs except for platelet counts (correlation coefficient 0.26). Qualitative interviews with nine of the 31 patients emphasized that the patients were comfortable using the self-testing instrument and becoming an active partner in their own treatment. CBC self-testing at home produced clinically valid hemoglobin and white blood cell counts with the added benefit that the patients became active partners in their own treatment course, which was of great importance for the patients and increased their wellbeing.

Iptacopan Efficacy and Safety to Treat Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria (PNH): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) is an uncommon blood condition caused by complement-mediated hemolysis. In early clinical studies, iptacopan, an oral factor B inhibitor, showed promise in treating PNH. This systematic review aimed to compile information on the effectiveness and safety of iptacopan for PNH.A systematic review was performed using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) standards. The Medline, Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane Central databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies that evaluated iptacopan for PNH. The primary efficacy outcomes were hemoglobin and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) changes. A fixed-effects model was used for the meta-analysis. Six studies (three prospective cohorts, two RCTs, and one non-randomized trial) were included, comprising 197 patients. Iptacopan therapy significantly increased hemoglobin levels (mean differences (MD) = 12.98 g/L; 95% CI: 11.82-14.13; p < 0.0001) and decreased LDH (MD = -83.55 IU/L; 95% CI: -83.77 to -83.34; p < 0.0001). Subgroup analyses revealed more significant hemoglobin increases in European vs. Asian populations, studies with baseline Hb > 10 g/dL vs. < 10 g/dL, and studies lasting > 24 weeks vs. ≤ 24 weeks. LDH decreases were more pronounced in studies with baseline LDH > 500 IU/L vs. < 500 IU/L. The incidence of adverse events ranged from 66% to 90%, with the most common being headache, nasopharyngitis, and diarrhea. Serious adverse events occurred in 0-20% of patients across studies. Only one patient withdrew because adverse effects were reported across all studies.Preliminary data support iptacopan's effectiveness in improving hemoglobin levels and lowering hemolysis in PNH, both as a monotherapy and in combination with usual treatment. The safety profile appears to be excellent, with a minimal incidence of major adverse events and treatment discontinuation. Further studies are needed to validate the effectiveness and safety of larger, longer-term trials. Iptacopan is a viable oral therapy option for PNH.

Effect of a Mobile Health-Based Remote Interaction Management Intervention on the Quality of Life and Self-Management Behavior of Patients With Low Anterior Resection Syndrome: Randomized Controlled Trial.

People who undergo sphincter-preserving surgery have high rates of anorectal functional disturbances, known as low anterior resection syndrome (LARS). LARS negatively affects patients' quality of life (QoL) and increases their need for self-management behaviors. Therefore, approaches to enhance self-management behavior and QoL are vital. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of a remote digital management intervention designed to enhance the QoL and self-management behavior of patients with LARS. From July 2022 to May 2023, we conducted a single-blinded randomized controlled trial and recruited 120 patients with LARS in a tertiary hospital in Hefei, China. All patients were randomly assigned to the intervention group (using the "e-bowel safety" applet and monthly motivational interviewing) or the control group (usual care and an information booklet). Our team provided a 3-month intervention and followed up with all patients for an additional 3 months. The primary outcome was patient QoL measured using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30. The secondary outcomes were evaluated using the Bowel Symptoms Self-Management Behaviors Questionnaire, LARS score, and Perceived Social Support Scale. Data collection occurred at study enrollment, the end of the 3-month intervention, and the 3-month follow-up. Generalized estimating equations were used to analyze changes in all outcome variables. In the end, 111 patients completed the study. In the intervention group, 5 patients withdrew; 4 patients withdrew in the control group. Patients in the intervention group had significantly larger improvements in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 total score (mean difference 11.51; 95% CI 10.68-12.35; Cohen d=1.73) and Bowel Symptoms Self-Management Behaviors Questionnaire total score (mean difference 8.80; 95% CI 8.28-9.32; Cohen d=1.94) than those in the control group. This improvement effect remained stable at 3-month follow-up (mean difference 14.47; 95% CI 13.65-15.30; Cohen d=1.58 and mean difference 8.85; 95% CI 8.25-9.42; Cohen d=2.23). The LARS score total score had significantly larger decreases after intervention (mean difference -3.28; 95% CI -4.03 to -2.54; Cohen d=-0.39) and at 3-month follow-up (mean difference -6.69; 95% CI -7.45 to -5.93; Cohen d=-0.69). The Perceived Social Support Scale total score had significantly larger improvements after intervention (mean difference 0.47; 95% CI 0.22-0.71; Cohen d=1.81). Our preliminary findings suggest that the mobile health-based remote interaction management intervention significantly enhanced the self-management behaviors and QoL of patients with LARS, and the effect was sustained. Mobile health-based remote interventions become an effective method to improve health outcomes for many patients with LARS. Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2200061317; https://tinyurl.com/tmmvpq3.

45 INTerpath-004: A phase 2, randomized, double-blind study of pembrolizumab with V940 (mRNA-4157) or placebo in the adjuvant treatment of renal cell carcinoma

Abstract Background The PD-1 inhibitor pembrolizumab is approved as monotherapy for the adjuvant treatment of patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) who are at increased risk of recurrence following nephrectomy or nephrectomy and resection of metastatic lesions based on results from the phase 3 KEYNOTE-564 trial. Novel combination strategies could provide further clinical benefit in the adjuvant setting. V940 (mRNA-4157) is an individualized neoantigen therapy that is hypothesized to increase the antitumor activity of T cells and enhance the activity of pembrolizumab. V940 plus pembrolizumab showed improved clinical outcomes for stage III/IV melanoma compared with pembrolizumab alone in the phase 2b KEYNOTE-942 study. INTerpath-004 is a global, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, phase 2 trial (NCT06307431) designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of adjuvant pembrolizumab with V940 or placebo in patients with RCC who have undergone nephrectomy. Methods Eligible patients are adults with histologically or cytologically confirmed RCC with clear cell or papillary histology (intermediate-high risk [pT2 Gr4, N0, M0 or pT3 Gr3/4, N0, M0], high-risk [pT4, N0, M0 or pT any stage, N1, M0], or M1 NED [solid, isolated, soft tissue metastases that can be completely resected at the time of nephrectomy or ≤2 years from nephrectomy]) with or without sarcomatoid features. Patients must have undergone nephrectomy and/or metastasectomy ≤12 weeks prior to randomization and be tumor-free as assessed by investigator. Patients must not have received prior systemic therapy ≤4 weeks or radiotherapy ≤2 weeks prior to randomization. Approximately 272 patients will be randomly assigned 1:1 to receive pembrolizumab 400 mg intravenously every 6 weeks for up to 9 cycles in combination with either V940 1 mg or placebo intramuscularly every 3 weeks for up to 9 doses or treatment discontinuation due to unacceptable toxicity, disease recurrence, patient withdrawal, or investigator decision. Randomization will be stratified by histology (clear cell vs papillary) and disease risk (intermediate-high vs high vs M1 NED). Imaging assessments (computed tomography or magnetic resonance imagery) will be performed every 12 weeks through year 2, every 16 weeks in years 3-5, and every 24 weeks in year 6 and beyond. The primary endpoint is disease-free survival by investigator assessment. Secondary endpoints include distant metastasis-free survival, overall survival, and safety parameters including adverse events (AEs), laboratory test results, and vital signs. AEs will be monitored throughout the study and for 30 days after the last dose of treatment (90 for serious AEs) and graded per National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0. Efficacy will be assessed in all randomly assigned patients, and safety will be assessed in all patients who received ≥1 dose of study intervention. Recruitment is ongoing.

Dupilumab in Adults With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis

Moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease that often requires continuous long-term systemic management. Long-term safety and efficacy data for treatment options are critically important. To assess the safety and efficacy of dupilumab treatment for up to 5 years in adults with moderate to severe AD. The 5-year LIBERTY AD open-label extension study was conducted from September 2013 to June 2022 at 550 sites in 28 countries. The study enrolled adult patients with moderate to severe AD who had participated in previous dupilumab clinical trials. Data were analyzed from August 2022 to February 2023. At enrollment, patients initiated a regimen of subcutaneous dupilumab, 200 mg, weekly (400-mg loading dose). The regimen was amended in June 2014 to dupilumab, 300 mg, weekly (600-mg loading dose) based on a dose-ranging study and again in November 2019 to dupilumab, 300 mg, every 2 weeks to align with the regulatory regimen approvals. The primary end points were the incidence and rate of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Key secondary end points included incidence and rate of serious TEAEs and adverse events of special interest, proportion of patients achieving an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score of 0 or 1 (clear or almost clear), and proportion of patients with 75% or more improvement in the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) from the parent study baseline. A total of 2677 patients were enrolled and treated in the open-label extension study; 1611 (60.2%) were male, and the mean (SD) age was 39.2 (13.4) years. A total of 334 patients (12.5%) completed treatment up to week 260. The most common reasons for withdrawal were due to regulatory approval of dupilumab in compliance with the study protocol (810 of 1380 [58.7%]), patient withdrawal (248 of 1380 [18.0%]), and adverse events (116 of 1380 [8.4%]). Exposure-adjusted rates of TEAEs were generally stable or declined throughout the study. Common TEAEs (incidence of 5% or greater) included nasopharyngitis, worsening AD, upper respiratory tract infection, conjunctivitis, conjunctivitis allergic, headache, oral herpes, and injection-site reaction. At week 260, 220 of 326 patients (67.5%) achieved an IGA score of 0 or 1 and 288 of 324 (88.9%) achieved 75% or greater improvement in the EASI. The mean (SD) EASI score was 16.39 (14.60) at baseline and 2.75 (5.62) at end of study. In this study, there was sustained safety and efficacy of continuous long-term dupilumab treatment for adults with moderate to severe AD.

Comparative efficacy and safety of gabapentin, pregabalin, oxcarbazepine, and duloxetine in diabetic peripheral neuropathy: A network meta-analysis

Abstract Purpose: To conduct a network meta-analysis comparing the safety and efficacy of gabapentin (GBP), pregabalin (PGB), oxcarbazepine (OXC), and duloxetine (DLX) in treating diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN). Materials and Methods: The study’s eligibility criteria includee randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with a focus on DPN patients receiving GBP, PGB, DLX, or OXC versus placebo. Noncompliant trials with incomplete information and observational studies were excluded. Results: Twelve (RCTs) of PGB, 2 of GBP, 3 of DLX, and 1 of OXC met the inclusion criteria. When drugs were compared for efficacy (direct comparison), GBP (Odd’s ratio [OR] = 3.208, P &lt; 0.001) was most effective followed by OXC (OR = 2.4, P = 0.0248), DLX (OR = 2.346, P &lt; 0.001), and PGB (OR = 2.161, P &lt; 0.001). When drugs were compared for withdrawal due to adverse drug reaction (ADR) (direct comparison), GBP (OR = 1.3818, P = 0.766) was safest followed by PGB (OR = 2.16, P &lt; 0.001), DLX (OR = 2.469, P &lt; 0.001), and OXC (OR = 4.4967, P = 0.001). Indirect comparison was done for efficacy, DLX was statistically significant than PGB and OXC (DLX vs. PGB, P = 0.03; DLX vs. OXC, P = 0.02). When indirect comparison was done for patient withdrawal due to ADR, OXC was worst (GBP vs. OXC, P = 0.0001; PGB vs. OXC, P = 0.007; DLX vs. OXC, P = 0.015). When drugs were compared for individual ADRs (direct comparison), dizziness was most commonly seen with OXC (OR = 9.6535, P = 1.8425), headache with OXC (OR = 3.8686, P = 0.006), somnolence with PGB (OR = 5.189, P &lt; 0.001), and nausea with DLX (OR = 3.264, P &lt; 0.001). GBP was most effective and safest drug followed by OXC &gt; DLX &gt; PGB for efficacy and PGB &gt; DLX &gt; OXC for safety. Conclusion: In evaluating medications for DPN against placebo, GBP and OXC demonstrated the highest effectiveness while maintaining a favorable safety profile.

Bone Pain and Survival Among Patients With Metastatic, Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer

The presence of bone pain is significantly associated with worse overall survival (OS) in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer. However, there are few data regarding bone pain and survival outcomes in the context of metastatic, hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (MHSPC). To compare survival outcomes among patients with MHSPC by presence or absence of baseline bone pain at diagnosis. This post hoc secondary analysis, conducted from September 1 to December 31, 2023, used patient-level data from SWOG-1216, a phase 3, prospective randomized clinical trial that enrolled patients with newly diagnosed MHSPC from 248 academic and community centers across the US from March 1, 2013, to July 15, 2017. All patients in the intention-to-treat population who had available bone pain status were eligible and included in this secondary analysis. In the SWOG-1216 trial, patients were randomized (1:1) to receive either androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with orteronel, 300 mg orally twice daily (experimental group), or ADT with bicalutamide, 50 mg orally daily (control group), until disease progression, unacceptable toxic effects, or patient withdrawal. Overall survival was the primary end point; progression-free survival (PFS) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response were secondary end points. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used for both univariable and multivariable analyses adjusting for age, treatment type, Gleason score, disease volume, Zubrod performance status, and PSA level. Of the 1279 male study participants, 301 (23.5%) had baseline bone pain at MHSPC diagnosis and 896 (70.1%) did not. Bone pain status was unavailable in 82 patients (6.4%). The median age of the 1197 patients eligible and included in this secondary analysis was 67.6 years (IQR, 61.8-73.6 years). Compared with patients who did not experience bone pain, those with baseline bone pain were younger (median age, 66.0 [IQR, 60.1-73.4] years vs 68.2 [IQR, 62.4-73.7] years; P = .02) and had a higher incidence of high-volume disease (212 [70.4%] vs 373 [41.6%]; P < .001). After adjustment, bone pain was associated with shorter PFS and OS. At a median follow-up of 4.0 years (IQR, 2.5-5.4 years), patients with bone pain had median PFS of 1.3 years (95% CI, 1.1-1.7 years) vs 3.7 years (95% CI, 3.3-4.2 years) in patients without initial bone pain (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR], 1.46; 95% CI, 1.22-1.74; P < .001) and OS of 3.9 years (95% CI, 3.3-4.8 years) vs not reached (NR) (95% CI, 6.6 years to NR) in patients without initial bone pain (AHR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.34-2.05; P < .001). In this post hoc secondary analysis of the SWOG-1216 randomized clinical trial, patients with baseline bone pain at MHSPC diagnosis had worse survival outcomes than those without bone pain. These data suggest prioritizing these patients for enrollment in clinical trials, may aid patient counseling, and indicate that the inclusion of bone pain in prognostic models of MHSPC may be warranted. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01809691.

CD22-directed CAR T-cell therapy for large B-cell lymphomas progressing after CD19-directed CAR T-cell therapy: a dose-finding phase 1 study

Outcomes are poor for patients with large B-cell lymphoma who relapse after CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy (CAR19). CD22 is a nearly universally expressed B-cell surface antigen and the efficacy of a CD22-directed CAR T-cell therapy (CAR22) in large B-cell lymphoma is unknown, which was what we aimed to examine in this study. In this single centre, open-label, dose-escalation phase 1 trial, we intravenously administered CAR22 at two dose levels (1 million and 3 million CAR22-positive T cells per kg of bodyweight) to adult patients (aged ≥18 years) who relapsed after CAR19 or had CD19-negative large B-cell lymphoma. The primary endpoints were manufacturing feasibility, safety measured by the incidence and severity of adverse events and dose-limiting toxicities, and identification of the maximum tolerated dose (ie, the recommended phase 2 dose). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04088890) and is active, but closed for enrolment. From Oct 17, 2019, to Oct 19, 2022, a total of 41 patients were assessed for eligibility; however, one patient withdrew. 40 patients underwent leukapheresis and 38 (95%) had CAR T-cell products manufactured successfully. The median age was 65 years (range 25-84), 17 (45%) were women, 32 (84%) had elevated pretreatment lactate dehydrogenase, 11 (29%) had refractory disease to all previous therapies, and patients had received a median of four lines of previous therapy (range 3-8). Of the 38 patients treated, 37 (97%) had relapsed after previous CAR19. The identified maximum tolerated dose was 1 million CAR T cells per kg. Of 29 patients who received the maximum tolerated dose, no patients developed a dose-limiting toxicity or grade 3 or higher cytokine release syndrome, immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome, or immune effector cell-associated haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis-like syndrome. This trial identifies CD22 as an immunotherapeutic target in large B-cell lymphoma and demonstrates the durable clinical activity of CAR22 in patients with disease progression after CAR19 therapy. Although these findings are promising, it is essential to recognise that this is a phase 1 dose-finding study. Further investigations are warranted to establish the long-term efficacy and to delineate the patient subgroups that will derive the most benefit from this therapeutic approach. National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Stanford Cancer Institute, Leukemia & Lymphoma Society, Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, Lymph & Co, and the European Hematology Association.

CNSC-02. PEDIATRIC BRAIN TUMOR CONSORTIUM (PBTC)-056: A PHASE 1 STUDY OF THE ADAM-10 INHIBITOR, INCB007839, IN CHILDREN WITH RECURRENT/PROGRESSIVE HIGH-GRADE GLIOMAS TO TARGET MICROENVIRONMENTAL NEUROLOGIN-3

Abstract BACKGROUND Pediatric high-grade gliomas (pHGGs), including diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG), are a leading cause of central nervous system tumor-related morbidity and mortality in children. Neuronal activity promotes growth of HGGs; one key mechanism is neuronal activity-regulated shedding of neuroligin-3 into the glioma microenvironment, mediated by the protease (A Disintegrin and Metalloprotease) ADAM10. ADAM10 inhibition slows tumor growth in preclinical pHGG models. Here, we report results of the clinical trial PBTC-056 (NCT04295759) evaluating safety and tolerability of INCB007839, an inhibitor of the ADAM 10 and 17 proteases. METHODS Patients aged 3-21 years old with recurrent/progressive pHGGs, including DIPG, were eligible. Additional eligibility criteria included measurable disease and failure of at least 1 standard treatment. One dose level (120mg/m2/dose twice daily [BID]) was tested, and the trial was subsequently amended to require prophylactic anticoagulation with enoxaparin due to an unanticipated toxicity. The primary objective was to assess the safety and tolerability of INCB007839 for children with pHGGs. RESULTS 12 of 13 eligible subjects were evaluable. Median age was 13.5 years (4.9-20.7 years). Diagnoses included: DIPG (54%), glioblastoma multiforme (31%), anaplastic astrocytoma (8%) and CNS primary tumor NOS (8%). All patients were treated at DL1 and remained on study for 1-4 courses. The most common toxicities were lymphopenia, elevated transaminases, and fatigue. There were 3 dose-limiting toxicities: Grade 5 cerebral venous thrombosis (n=1), Grade 3 alanine aminotransferase increase (n=1) and Grade 2 thrombocytopenia (n=1). Ten patients progressed/relapsed during active treatment, 1 patient died on treatment, and 2 patients withdrew (1 prior to starting therapy). CONCLUSIONS INCB007839 was generally well tolerated with a recommended phase 2 dose of 120mg/m2/dose BID and concurrent prophylactic anti-coagulation. These data, combined with foundational preclinical studies targeting neuron-cancer interactions, open the door to possible cancer neuroscience strategies, including combination therapy, for pediatric high-grade gliomas.

Effects of intensive lifestyle changes on the progression of mild cognitive impairment or early dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease: a randomized, controlled clinical trial

BackgroundEvidence links lifestyle factors with Alzheimer’s disease (AD). We report the first randomized, controlled clinical trial to determine if intensive lifestyle changes may beneficially affect the progression of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or early dementia due to AD.MethodsA 1:1 multicenter randomized controlled phase 2 trial, ages 45-90 with MCI or early dementia due to AD and a Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score of 18 or higher. The primary outcome measures were changes in cognition and function tests: Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC), Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS-Cog), Clinical Dementia Rating–Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB), and Clinical Dementia Rating Global (CDR-G) after 20 weeks of an intensive multidomain lifestyle intervention compared to a wait-list usual care control group. ADAS-Cog, CDR-SB, and CDR-Global scales were compared using a Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon rank-sum test, and CGIC was compared using Fisher’s exact test. Secondary outcomes included plasma Aβ42/40 ratio, other biomarkers, and correlating lifestyle with the degree of change in these measures.ResultsFifty-one AD patients enrolled, mean age 73.5. No significant differences in any measures at baseline. Only two patients withdrew. All patients had plasma Aβ42/40 ratios <0.0672 at baseline, strongly supporting AD diagnosis. After 20 weeks, significant between-group differences in the CGIC (p= 0.001), CDR-SB (p= 0.032), and CDR Global (p= 0.037) tests and borderline significance in the ADAS-Cog test (p= 0.053). CGIC, CDR Global, and ADAS-Cog showed improvement in cognition and function and CDR-SB showed significantly less progression, compared to the control group which worsened in all four measures. Aβ42/40 ratio increased in the intervention group and decreased in the control group (p = 0.003). There was a significant correlation between lifestyle and both cognitive function and the plasma Aβ42/40 ratio. The microbiome improved only in the intervention group (p <0.0001).ConclusionsComprehensive lifestyle changes may significantly improve cognition and function after 20 weeks in many patients with MCI or early dementia due to AD.Trial registrationApproved by Western Institutional Review Board on 12/31/2017 (#20172897) and by Institutional Review Boards of all sites. This study was registered retrospectively with clinicaltrials.gov on October 8, 2020 (NCT04606420, ID: 20172897).

Concentrated growth factor and collagen as barrier materials in alveolar ridge preservation for posterior teeth: a prospective cohort study with one-year follow-up.

This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of concentrated growth factor (CGF) membrane and collagen as barrier materials in sealing the alveolar socket in alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) in the posterior region during a one-year follow-up. A total of 24 patients who underwent ARP in the posterior region were selected for inclusion and randomly assigned to the CGF group (12 cases) and Collagen group (12 cases). The patients in both groups underwent extraction of posterior teeth. The extraction sockets were filled with a bone substitute to the level of the pre-extraction buccal and lingual or palatal alveolar bone plates. The wounds in the CGF group were closed with a fabricated CGF overlaying the upper edge of the bone substitute material, whereas those in the Collagen group were closed with Bio-Oss Collagen. The implants were placed after 6 months. The evaluation was based on implant retention, re-grafting rate, and vertical and horizontal alveolar ridge bone volume changes measured by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Data were statistically analyzed using SPSS 28.0 software. No patient withdrew throughout the follow-up period. No implant failure and no severe peri-implant or mucosal soft tissue complications were observed. Six months after the operation, the degree of vertical alveolar ridge height resorption in the CGF group was lower than that in the Collagen group (P<0.05). There were no statistically difference between the groups at 1 year after the operation (P>0.05). The amount of bone reduction in horizontal alveolar ridge width showed no difference between the groups at 6 months and 1 year after surgery (P>0.05). CGF membrane and Bio-Oss Collagen as barrier materials for posterior ARP inhibited reduction in alveolar ridge bone mass.

INTerpath-001: Pembrolizumab with V940 (mRNA-4157) versus pembrolizumab with placebo for adjuvant treatment of high-risk stage II-IV melanoma.

TPS9616 Background: The anti−PD-1 antibody pembrolizumab is approved as adjuvant therapy for stage IIB-C and stage III melanoma by AJCC 8th ed, following complete resection. Adjuvant pembrolizumab has improved recurrence-free survival (RFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) in patients with high-risk melanoma, but many patients experience disease recurrence. In the randomized phase 2b KEYNOTE-942 study, the individualized neoantigen therapy V940 showed improved RFS and DMFS when used in combination with pembrolizumab versus pembrolizumab monotherapy in patients with stage III or IV melanoma. INTerpath-001 (NCT05933577) is a double-blind phase 3 randomized controlled trial designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of adjuvant pembrolizumab plus V940 versus pembrolizumab plus placebo in patients with resected high-risk stage II-IV melanoma. Methods: Eligible patients are aged ≥18 years with surgically resected stage IIB or IIC (pathologic or clinical), III, or IV cutaneous melanoma per AJCC 8th ed and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. Patients are ineligible if they have received any prior systemic therapy and if more than 13 weeks has elapsed between last surgical resection and first dose of pembrolizumab. Patients with ocular or mucosal melanoma and past or current in-transit metastases or satellitosis are excluded. All patients must provide a blood sample and a formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor sample for sequencing. Patients will be stratified by risk (IIB, IIC, IIIA, and IIIB vs IIIC/D and IV) and age (&lt;65 years vs ≥65 years). Approximately 1089 patients will be randomly assigned 2:1 to receive pembrolizumab 400 mg plus V940 1 mg or pembrolizumab 400 mg with placebo. Pembrolizumab will be administered intravenously every 6 weeks and v940 or placebo will be administered intramuscularly every 3 weeks. Treatment will continue for up to 9 doses or until disease recurrence, unacceptable toxicity, or patient withdrawal. The primary end point is RFS by investigator review. Secondary end points are DMFS by investigator review, overall survival, safety and tolerability, and quality of life. Hazard ratios and 95% CIs will be estimated using a stratified Cox regression model with the Efron method of handling ties. Between-treatment differences will be evaluated using a stratified log-rank test. Enrollment is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT05933577 .

BGB-11417-203: An ongoing, phase 2 study of sonrotoclax (BGB-11417), a next-generation BCL2 inhibitor, in patients with Waldenström macroglobulinemia.

TPS7090 Background: Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors and anti-CD20 antibody-based systemic therapy are included within the preferred treatment algorithms for Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM). However, to date, no treatments have been approved for patients with WM that is refractory to both BTK inhibitors and anti-CD20 therapy. Venetoclax, the first-generation BCL2 inhibitor, has demonstrated clinical activity in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) WM (Castillo et al. J Clin Oncol. 2022), but it has no regulatory approvals in WM. Sonrotoclax, a next generation BCL2 inhibitor, is more selective and a more pharmacologically potent inhibitor of BCL2 than venetoclax. In a phase 1 trial, sonrotoclax monotherapy was well tolerated at all dose levels tested up to 640 mg and showed promising evidence of antitumor activity in patients with R/R WM (Soumerai et al. Blood. 2022). Based on the data from these earlier studies, a phase 2 study of sonrotoclax monotherapy in patients with WM has been initiated and is currently recruiting. Methods: BGB-11417-203 (NCT05952037) is an open-label, international, phase 2 study. Eligible patients have histologically confirmed WM that is R/R to both BTK inhibitor therapy and anti-CD20–based systemic therapy combined with chemotherapy or a proteasome inhibitor (PI; Cohort 1); R/R to anti-CD20–based systemic therapy combined with chemotherapy or a PI and who are intolerant to BTK inhibitor therapy (Cohort 2); or R/R to a BTK inhibitor and who are unsuitable for chemoimmunotherapy (Cohort 3). Patients who have received previous treatment with a BCL2 inhibitor are ineligible. Approximately 85 patients will be enrolled across cohorts and will receive sonrotoclax until disease progression, death, unacceptable toxicity, patient withdrawal, loss to follow-up, or study termination. The primary endpoint is major response rate (MRR; defined as partial response or better) in Cohort 1 per IWWM-11 criteria, as assessed by independent review committee (IRC). Key secondary endpoints include MRR assessed by investigator (INV) in Cohort 1 and by IRC and INV in both Cohorts 2 and 3; overall response rate, duration of response, and progression-free survival by IRC and INV; overall survival; and safety and tolerability. Patient recruitment is ongoing in Australia, the US, China, and Europe. Clinical trial information: NCT05952037 .

Adjunct role of potassium-rich vegetarian diet and a novel potassium food supplement to improve pain in chronic rheumatoid arthritis on supervised standard care: a randomised controlled study

IntroductionAn earlier food survey showed dietary potassium deficiency in rheumatoid arthritis (RA).ObjectiveTo evaluate an adjunct role of oral potassium to reduce joint pain in RA.Methods172 consenting eligible symptomatic patients (median...

Preliminary results from the phase 2 study of AFM24 in combination with atezolizumab in patients with EGFR wild-type (EGFR-WT) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

2522 Background: Immunotherapy combinations could be a promising strategy to overcome resistance to existing therapies. AFM24, a first in class, bispecific, tetravalent innate cell engager, binds CD16A on innate effector cells (NK cells and macrophages) and EGFR on solid tumors, redirecting and enhancing the innate and possibly the adaptive immune response towards tumors. Atezolizumab, a PD-L1 inhibitor, abrogates activation of the PD-1 immune checkpoint, potentiating the adaptive immune response. This Phase 1/2a study (NCT05109442) is evaluating if combining AFM24 with atezolizumab synergistically enhances both innate and adaptive immunity to effectively target EGFR+ solid tumors. Here we report initial results of the EGFR-WT NSCLC expansion cohort. Methods: The recommended Phase 2 dose of 480 mg AFM24 is given intravenously (IV) weekly in combination with 840 mg atezolizumab IV fortnightly, in patients with advanced or metastatic EGFR-WT NSCLC who progressed on ≥1 prior line of therapy including at least a platinum doublet and a checkpoint inhibitor (CPI). The primary endpoint is overall response rate by RECIST v1.1 by Investigator assessment. Secondary endpoints include safety, pharmacokinetics, and immunogenicity. Treatment is given in four-week cycles until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, investigator discretion, or patient withdrawal of consent. Tumor assessments are performed at screening, cycles 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12; and every three cycles thereafter. Results: As of January 2024, 17 patients in the EGFR-WT NSCLC cohort received AFM24 and atezolizumab for a mean (range) duration of 14.4 (1–33) weeks. Median (range) age is 66 (45–75) years; 82.4% male; European Cooperative Oncology Status Performance Score 0–1; median (range) number of prior lines is 2 (1–5). The combination was well tolerated with no new or unexpected toxicities observed compared to each single agent. The most common AFM24-related adverse events were infusion-related reactions (10 Grade 1–2, two Grade 3). Of the 15 response-evaluable patients, one complete response and three PRs were confirmed; two showed shrinkage of ≥50% in target lesions from baseline. All responders were resistant to prior CPI. Seven patients achieved stable disease as BOR. After a median follow-up time of 5.5 (95% CI 3.45; 5.55) months, 8 patients are still on treatment including all responders. Conclusions: AFM24 with atezolizumab shows remarkable signs of clinical efficacy, even in patients with resistance to prior CPI, and a well-tolerated and manageable safety profile in patients with EGFR-WT NSCLC. The study is ongoing and up to 40 patients will be enrolled into this cohort. Clinical trial information: NCT05109442 .

TOPOLOGY: A phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and toxicities of PLX038, in patients with locally advanced or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer.

TPS1142 Background: Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) is an anti-TROP2 antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) with an SN-38 payload (topoisomerase I inhibitor) that was recently approved for use in advanced triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). The rapid spontaneous linker hydrolysis in sacituzumab-govitecan releases a very large amount of SN-38 cargo systemically, which may in part contribute to efficacy and also in part be responsible for systemic side effects (1). PLX038 is a 40 kDa 4-arm PEG-SN38 conjugate with a half-life of 5 days. It has a controlled, slow-release rate which allows high SN-38 exposure over an extended period of time with a low Cmax, and very low levels of SN-38-glucuronide. The PLX038 nanomolecule also penetrates large pores of tumor vasculature, and accumulates and is retained in the tumor for long periods. The prolonged exposure of tumors to SN-38 may result in increased efficacy without resulting in severe gastrointestinal toxicity. We hypothesize that PLX038 may be effective in patients with advanced TNBC who have been previously treated with standard chemotherapy regimens. Methods: This is an open label, multi-centric phase II study designed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and efficacy of PLX038 in locally advanced or metastatic TNBC previously treated with at least two prior cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens for locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer including an anthracycline, taxane and sacituzumab govitecan. Patients will be treated at a dose of 1730mg/m2 IV infusion on Day 1 of each cycle Q3W (every 21 days, 1 cycle = 1 injection) after at least a first cycle at 1300mg/m2. At the discretion of the treating physician, the PLX038 dose will be increased to 1730 mg/m2 for patients who tolerate at least 1 cycle. All included patients will receive PLX038 as single agent as long as study is ongoing or until progression of disease, unacceptable toxicity, patient withdrawal of consent, Investigator decision, lost to follow-up, death, patient non-compliance, or study termination by Sponsor. The primary endpoint is the best tumor response (defined as partial or complete response in the first 6 months of treatment) assessed by investigators per RECIST v1.1 criteria, with tumor assessments every 8 weeks (± 7 days). Secondary endpoints include i) efficacy criteria (time to response, duration of response, progression-free survival, overall survival), ii) toxicity criteria (AE/SAEs), iii) association between PLX038 efficacy and biomarkers (homologous recombination defect, replication stress-related biomarkers such as SFLN11 expression, RB1 loss), iv) PK/PD analysis. A Simon's two-stage optimum design will be used, and a maximum of N=44 patients will be included, 1. Santi et al., Biodrugs 2024. Clinical trial information: NCT06162351 .

Carbopol 934-based transethosomal gel of Glycyrrhizic acid for the management of skin cancer

Glycyrrhizic acid (GA) exhibited potential anti-cancer efficacy and was used for the treatment of skin cancer. Transethosomes were developed to improve the solubility, bioavailability, and permeability of GA since it shows high solubility in ethanol. The topical route offers the benefits of higher patient compliance, easy administration, and withdrawal in case of any side effects. The GA loaded transethosome (GA-TE) was optimized by using the Box-Behnken design. The optimized GA-TE formulation was characterized for vesicle size, and zeta potential, which were 127.6 ± 0.8 nm and −24.41 ± 0.7 mV respectively. The % entrapment efficiency and % drug loading of the optimized GA-TE formulation were found to be 85.22 ± 0.94 % and 6.22 ± 0.43 % respectively. The prepared GA-TE formulation was converted to topical gel by incorporating 1 % Carbopol 934 as a gelling agent. The texture analysis of GA-TE gel showed that the values of cohesiveness, work of cohesion, consistency, and firmness were suitable for the topical delivery system for skin cancer as compared to the conventional gel. The results of ex-vivo and in-vitro permeation of GA-TE gel showed better and enhanced permeation than conventional gel. The confocal laser scanning microscopy results showed better permeation, retention, deposition, and distribution of rhodamine B-loaded GA-TE gel formulation into the skin as compared to conventional gel. The produced GA-TE formulation was proven to be beneficial in treating skin cancer based on the in-vivo results.

Abstract PS16-02: Efficacy and safety of first-line atezolizumab + bevacizumab + paclitaxel in patients with advanced triple-negative breast cancer: the ATRACTIB phase 2 trial

Abstract BACKGROUND Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive tumor characterized by poor outcomes and new treatment strategies are urgently required. The programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) antibody (Ab) atezolizumab (ATZ) combined with first-line (1L) nab-paclitaxel (nab-PTX) is approved in multiple countries for the treatment of PD-L1-positive patients (pts) with advanced TNBC (aTNBC) based on a significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) and a numerically higher and clinically meaningful median overall survival (OS). A synergism between antiangiogenic therapy and immunotherapy (IO)-based strategies has been observed preclinically and in different tumor types, but data in aTNBC is lacking. METHODS ATRACTIB (NCT04408118) is an international, open-label, single-arm, phase 2 trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of 1L ATZ + BVZ + PTX for pts with aTNBC, regardless of their tumors’ PD-L1 status. Adult pts with untreated, unresectable locally advanced/metastatic TNBC were included. Pts who had received (neo)adjuvant taxane-based chemotherapy (CT) and/or IO and/or an antiangiogenic agent had to have had a relapse with a disease-free interval beyond 12 months (mo). Pts received intravenous ATZ 840 mg + BVZ 10 mg/kg on days (D)1 and D15 + PTX 90 mg/m2 on D1, 8, and 15 of every 28-day cycle until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, death, or patient withdrawal. Tumor assessments were performed every 8 weeks for the first 12 mo and every 12 weeks thereafter. Baseline PD-L1 expression was centrally assessed using 22C3 (combined positive score [CPS]) and SP142 (expression on tumor-infiltrating immune cells [ICs]) Abs. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed PFS by RECIST v.1.1. Key secondary endpoints included OS, objective response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), duration of response (DoR), and safety. Median PFS was analyzed with exponential maximum likelihood estimation (H0: ≤7.0 mo; HA: ≥9.5 mo). We estimated that enrolling 100 pts would provide 80% power at one-sided α nominal level of 5%, assuming a 10% drop-out rate. RESULTS Between October 2020 and May 2022, 100 female pts from 28 centers across 5 European countries were included. Median age was 55.0 years (32.0 - 84.0), 57.0% of pts had visceral disease, 46.0% had ≥3 metastatic sites, and 70.0% had received prior treatment for early BC (taxane-based CT in 87.1% of them). A total of 82 and 85 tumor samples out of 100 pts were available for PD-L1 assessment using 22C3 and SP142 assays, respectively. Most pts had PD-L1-negative tumors (87.8% with 22C3 [CPS &amp;lt; 10] and 97.6% with SP142 [expression on &amp;lt; 1% positive of ICs]). At data cutoff (15th September 2023), 23 pts were still on therapy. With a median follow-up of 16.7 mo (1.1 - 34.1), median PFS was 11.0 mo (95% CI, 9.0 - 13.2). OS data were immature at data cutoff, with 30 events. Estimated 18-month OS was 69.4% (95% CI, 58.4% - 78.1%). ORR was 63.0% (95% CI, 52.8% - 72.4%), CBR was 79.0% (95% CI, 69.7% - 86.5%), and median DoR was 10.0 mo (95% CI, 7.2 - 13.8). Regarding safety, the most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were peripheral neuropathy (68.0%) and fatigue (62.0%). Grade (G) 3/4 treatment-related TEAEs occurred in 47.0% of pts, mainly peripheral neuropathy (13.0%) and neutropenia (12.0%). Any-grade immune-related TEAEs, thrombosis or embolism, and bleeding occurred in 13.0% (5.0%; G≥3), 4.0% (1.0%; G≥3), and 10.0% (0.0%; G≥3) of pts, respectively. There were no drug-related deaths. CONCLUSIONS 1L ATZ + BVZ + PTX demonstrated encouraging anti-tumor activity in aTNBC pts, most of them presenting with PD-L1-negative tumors. Median PFS seems to be much higher compared with that previously reported with other IO-based regimens in a similar patient population. The safety profile was consistent with the known safety data of ATZ and BVZ combined with CT, without significant added toxicity. These results merit further research of this combination for PD-L1-negative aTNBC. Citation Format: Maria Gion, Patricia Cortez-Castedo, Isabel Blancas, Alfonso Cortés, Frederik Marmé, Salvador Blanch, Serafin Morales Murillo, Nieves Díaz, Isabel Calvo-Plaza, Sabela Recalde, Alejandro Martínez-Bueno, Manuel Ruiz-Borrego, Elisenda Llabres, María Teresa Taberner, Michelino de Laurentiis, José Ángel García-Sáenz, Jana Repkova, Antonio Antón, Joseph Gligorov, Susana de la Cruz, Oliver Hoffmann, Jacques Medioni, Melissa Phillips, Miguel Sampayo-Cordero, Daniel Alcalá-López, José Manuel Pérez-García, Antonio Llombart-Cussac, Javier Cortés. Efficacy and safety of first-line atezolizumab + bevacizumab + paclitaxel in patients with advanced triple-negative breast cancer: the ATRACTIB phase 2 trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PS16-02.

Comparison between propofol and total inhalational anaesthesia on cardiovascular outcomes following on-pump cardiac surgery in higher-risk patients: a randomised controlled pilot and feasibility study

ObjectivesMyocardial revascularisation and cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) can cause ischaemia-reperfusion injury, leading to myocardial and other end-organ damage. Volatile anaesthetics protect the myocardium in experimental studies. However, there is uncertainty about...

Safety and Tolerability of Online Adaptive High-Field Magnetic Resonance-Guided Radiotherapy.

In 2018, the first online adaptive magnetic resonance (MR)-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) system using a 1.5-T MR-equipped linear accelerator (1.5-T MR-Linac) was clinically introduced. This system enables online adaptive radiotherapy, in which the radiation plan is adapted to size and shape changes of targets at each treatment session based on daily MR-visualized anatomy. To evaluate safety, tolerability, and technical feasibility of treatment with a 1.5-T MR-Linac, specifically focusing on the subset of patients treated with an online adaptive strategy (ie, the adapt-to-shape [ATS] approach). This cohort study included adults with solid tumors treated with a 1.5-T MR-Linac enrolled in Multi Outcome Evaluation for Radiation Therapy Using the MR-Linac (MOMENTUM), a large prospective international study of MRgRT between February 2019 and October 2021. Included were adults with solid tumors treated with a 1.5-T MR-Linac. Data were collected in Canada, Denmark, The Netherlands, United Kingdom, and the US. Data were analyzed in August 2023. All patients underwent MRgRT using a 1.5-T MR-Linac. Radiation prescriptions were consistent with institutional standards of care. Patterns of care, tolerability, and technical feasibility (ie, treatment completed as planned). Acute high-grade radiotherapy-related toxic effects (ie, grade 3 or higher toxic effects according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0) occurring within the first 3 months after treatment delivery. In total, 1793 treatment courses (1772 patients) were included (median patient age, 69 years [range, 22-91 years]; 1384 male [77.2%]). Among 41 different treatment sites, common sites were prostate (745 [41.6%]), metastatic lymph nodes (233 [13.0%]), and brain (189 [10.5%]). ATS was used in 1050 courses (58.6%). MRgRT was completed as planned in 1720 treatment courses (95.9%). Patient withdrawal caused 5 patients (0.3%) to discontinue treatment. The incidence of radiotherapy-related grade 3 toxic effects was 1.4% (95% CI, 0.9%-2.0%) in the entire cohort and 0.4% (95% CI, 0.1%-1.0%) in the subset of patients treated with ATS. There were no radiotherapy-related grade 4 or 5 toxic effects. In this cohort study of patients treated on a 1.5-T MR-Linac, radiotherapy was safe and well tolerated. Online adaptation of the radiation plan at each treatment session to account for anatomic variations was associated with a low risk of acute grade 3 toxic effects.