Patient Safety Indicators Research Articles

Call to Action: Quality and Simulation Professionals Should Collaborate.

Simulation is underutilized as a tool to improve healthcare quality and safety despite many examples of its effectiveness to identify and remedy quality and safety problems, improve teamwork, and improve various measures of quality and safety that are important to healthcare organizations, eg, patient safety indicators. We urge quality and safety and simulation professionals to collaborate with their counterparts in their organizations to employ simulation in ways that improve the quality and safety of care of their patients. These collaborations could begin through initiating conversations among the quality and safety and simulation professionals, perhaps using this article as a prompt for discussion, identifying one area in need of quality and safety improvement for which simulation can be helpful, and beginning that work.

Increased Risk and Unique Clinical Course of Patient Safety Indicator-3 Pressure Injuries Among COVID-19 Hospitalized Patients.

The COVID-19 pandemic introduced unique challenges to healthcare systems, particularly in relation to patient safety and adverse events during hospitalization. There is limited understanding of COVID-19's association with some patient safety indicators (PSIs). This study aimed to investigate the impact of COVID-19 infection on the rate of PSI-3 events and its implications on quality metrics. We compared PSI-3 event rates between COVID-19-infected and uninfected patients and examined the clinical characteristics of COVID-19 patients experiencing PSI-3 events. This is a retrospective study at Mayo Clinic hospitals between January 2020 and February 2022, analyzing patients meeting PSI-3 denominator eligibility criteria. PSI-3 events were identified using AHRQ WinQI software. Patients were categorized based on COVID-19 status. Patient demographics, characteristics, and PSI-3 rates were compared. A case series analysis described clinical details of COVID-19 patients with PSI-3 events. Of 126,781 encounters meeting PSI-3 criteria, 8674 (6.8%) had acute COVID-19 infection. COVID-19-infected patients were older, more likely to be male, non-white, and had private insurance. PSI-3 rates were significantly higher in COVID-19 patients (0.21% versus 0.06%, P < 0.0001), even after risk adjustment (adjusted risk ratio, 3.24, P < 0.0001). The case series of 17 COVID-19 patients with PSI-3 events showed distinctive clinical characteristics, including higher medical device-related pressure injuries, and greater predisposition for head, face, and neck region. Acute COVID-19 infection correlates with higher PSI-3 event rates. Current quality indicators may require adaptation to address the pandemic's complexities and impact on patient safety. Further research is needed to comprehensively understand the intricate relationship between COVID-19 and patient outcomes.

Traditional and Complementary Medicine Use among Cancer Patients in Asian Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Globally, cancer patients frequently use T&CM during their treatment for various reasons. The primary concerns regarding the use of T&CM among cancer patients are the potential risks associated with interactions between pharmaceuticals and T&CM, as well as the risk of noncompliance with conventional cancer treatments. Despite the higher prevalence of T&CM use in Asia, driven by cultural, historical, and resource-related factors, no prior review has tried to estimate the prevalence and influencing factors of T&CM use and disclosure among cancer patients in this region. This study aims to examine the prevalence and disclosure rates of T&CM use among cancer patients in Asia to assess various factors influencing its use across different cancer treatment settings in Asia. Systematic research on T&CM use was conducted using four databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and CINAHAL) from inception to January 2023. Quality was assessed using the Appraisal Tool for Cross-Sectional Studies (AXIS). A random effects model was used to estimate the pooled prevalence of T&CM use, and data analysis was performed using Stata Version 16.0. Among the 4849 records retrieved, 41 eligible studies conducted in 14 Asian countries were included, involving a total of 14,976 participants. The pooled prevalence of T&CM use was 49.3%, ranging from 24.0% to 94.8%, and the disclosure rate of T&CM use was 38.2% (11.9% to 82.5%). The most commonly used T&CM modalities were herbal medicines and traditional medicine. Females were 22.0% more likely to use T&CM than males. A subgroup analysis revealed the highest prevalence of T&CM use was found in studies conducted in East Asia (62.4%) and those covered by both national and private insurance (55.8%). The disclosure rate of T&CM use to physicians remains low. Moreover, the factors influencing this disclosure are still insufficiently explored. Since the disclosure of T&CM use is a crucial indicator of patient safety and the quality of cancer treatment prognosis, future research should focus on identifying the determinants of non-disclosure.

Latent Profile Analysis of Pressure Injury Knowledge Levels Among Nursing Staff in Tertiary General Hospitals.

Aims/Background The prevalence of pressure injuries (PIs) is a widely used clinical indicator of patient safety and quality of care. Nurses' understanding of pressure injury (PI) can significantly impact the treatment outcomes for patients. This study, based on latent profile analysis (LPA), reveals the characteristics associated with PI knowledge levels among clinical nurses in district and county tertiary medical institutions. We aim to help nursing managers formulate training plans accurately so that clinical nurses can provide high-level skin care services for patients. Method In June 2023, 1482 nurse staff from 4 tertiary general hospitals at the district and county level in Chengdu were chosen as research subjects using the convenience sampling method. Responses to the general information questionnaire, the Chinese Version of Pressure Ulcer Knowledge Assessment Tool (C-PUKAT), and the Chinese Version of Attitude towards Pressure ulcer Prevention (C-APuP) were used to compare the population's characteristics based on LPA. Results Three latent profiles of nurses' PI knowledge were identified: weak foundation type (46.3%), strengthening foundation type (42.7%), and special improvement type (11.0%). Subjects' departments, administrative positions, highest degrees and PI prevention attitude scores, as well as whether they have participated in the training, all differed significantly between latent profile groups (p < 0.05). Conclusion The PI knowledge level of nursing staff at the district and county tertiary general hospitals requires urgent improvement. Nursing managers should prioritize the management level and quality of PI training among clinical nursing staff. Precise training programs can be developed based on different categories of nursing staff to enhance their PI knowledge, thereby effectively improving the quality of healthcare for inpatients.

Effect of Feedback Provision on Improving Patient Safety Indices Based on Hospital Accreditation Model: A Study in Shahid Rahnemoon Hospital, Yazd

Background: Accreditation means systematic evaluation of health service centers with specific standards. One of the most important goals of the accreditation process is to improve patient safety. Patient safety visits are one of the most important standards for improving safety. One of the ways to increase the effectiveness of visits is holding feedback sessions. Objectives: The present study was conducted with the aim of assessing the effect of feedback provision on improving patient safety indices based on the hospital accreditation model in Shahid Rahnemoon Hospital, Yazd. Methods: The present study is a semi-experimental study with a before-and-after design that was conducted in Shahid Rahnemoon Hospital, Yazd, from September to December 2021 and January to August 2022. After each visit, formal feedback sessions were held with the attendance of patient safety team members and officials of the visited wards/units. Evaluation indicators included patient safety indicators in accreditation standards, such as error reporting, rate of unwanted events, and patient safety culture score. These were measured before and after feedback. The tools used were the patient safety standards evaluation checklist based on the accreditation model, the patient safety culture questionnaire, and other indicators extracted using documentation. The Patient Safety Culture Evaluation Questionnaire was completed by 360 nurses working in the hospital in the form of a census. Analysis was done using descriptive statistical tests and paired t-tests with STATA 14.2 software. Results: Based on the results of the study, safety feedback was provided to increase patient safety indicators in different departments and units of hospitals [t = - 4.8652, w/df = 10, P = 0.0007, (P = 0.05)]. A significant difference was observed in the amount of error reporting (P = 0.031) and patient safety (P &lt; 0.001) before and after the intervention. The degree of compliance with the dimensions of the patient safety culture had a statistically significant difference before and after the intervention (P &lt; 0.001). Conclusions: Providing a safety feedback program had a significant positive effect on the consumption and consequences of the patient’s safety culture. Therefore, conducting regular safety visits and setting up a direct feedback program to each department/unit after the visit, and the follow-up of corrective measures, will lead to an increase in patient safety standards.

Rates Of Patient Safety Indicators In Belgian Hospitals Were Low But Generally Higher Than In US Hospitals, 2016-18.

More than two decades ago, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality developed its Patient Safety Indicators (PSIs) to monitor potentially preventable and severe adverse events within hospitals. Application of PSIs outside the US was explored more than a decade ago, but it is uncertain whether they remain relevant within Europe, as no up-to-date assessments of overall PSI-associated adverse event rates or interhospital variability can be found in the literature. This article assesses the nationwide occurrence and variability of thirteen adverse events for a case study of Belgium. We studied 4,765,850 patient stays across all 101 hospitals for 2016-18. We established that although adverse event rates were generally low, with an adverse event observed in 0.1percent of medical hospital stays and in 1.2percent of surgical hospital stays, they were higher than equivalent US rates and were prone to considerable between-hospital variability. Failure-to-rescue rates, for example, equaled 23percent, whereas some hospitals exceeded nationwide central line-associated bloodstream infection rates by a factor of 8. Policy makers and hospital managers can prioritize PSIs that have high adverse event rates or large variability, such as failure to rescue or central line-associated bloodstream infections, to improve the quality of care in Belgian hospitals.

Characteristics of Patients Hospitalized to Community Hospitals With Malignant Brain Tumors and Factors Associated With Discharge Destination.

Our main objective was to compare the characteristics and hospital outcomes of patients with primary and metastatic brain malignancies and to investigate the associated factors related to hospital outcomes. We conducted a retrospective, cross-sectional study of 1628 patients with brain malignancies from 8 community hospitals between 2017 and 2022 who were identified using International Classification of Disease codes. A stepwise logistic regression was used to identify demographics and clinical characteristics associated with in-hospital mortality and home discharge. The median age was 65 years old, with 72.5% of patients having metastatic brain malignancies. After 7.2 days of hospital stay, 49.2% were discharged home, and 102 patients expired during hospitalization. Increased age, medical coverage by Medicare, hemiplegia or paraplegia, lower initial hemoglobin level, increased length of stay, and the use of electrolyte replacement, antibiotics, laxatives, heparin, and anticonvulsants were associated with a decreased likelihood of discharge to home. No medical insurance, Medicaid insurance coverage, comorbidities of cerebrovascular disorder, the need to stay in the intensive care unit, patient safety indicator events, and the use of antibiotics, oral analgesics, and ipratropium-albuterol were associated with increased odds of in-hospital mortality. We identified several predictor variables that delineate differences between both mortality risk and home discharge in patients with primary and metastatic brain tumors. Understanding these predictor variables can be helpful in improving the acute and post-acute care of this population.

Development and psychometric validation of a patient safety assessment tool in German Radiation Oncology: the PaSaGeRO Study protocol

IntroductionEnsuring patient safety in radiation oncology is crucial for delivering high-quality healthcare. Patient safety indicators (PSIs) provide a mechanism for identifying, quantifying and evaluating risks and the effectiveness of safety...

Safe provision of nursing care as predicted by nursing students: A cross-sectional study

Background &amp; Aim: Assessment of safety culture and nursing students’ competencies in patient safety is essential for readiness to provide quality and safe care. The objectives of the study are to examine how nursing students perceive patient safety culture and to evaluate factors that may influence their perceptions. Methods &amp; Materials: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted using the Slovak version of the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture for Nursing Students and the Questionnaire for Measuring Demographic Variables and Information on the Education Process. The study involved 242 nursing students from two faculties in Slovakia. Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Results: None of the dimensions of patient safety culture was rated by the nursing students above the necessary level of 75 %. Statistically significant correlations and differences were found between the nursing students’ perceptions of patient safety culture and some selected sociodemographic variables. Multiple regression analysis revealed significant associations between the nursing students’ perceptions of patient safety culture and overall patient safety grade, the number of reported events in the workplace, and the number of reported events by nursing students. Conclusion: Recognising nursing students’ perceptions of patient safety culture enables identification of weaknesses, and early implementation of targeted interventions and educational initiatives to increase overall patient safety in care provision. Future research should focus on recognizing relationships between perceived patient safety culture, teamwork, education, and indicators of safe and quality care during clinical training from nursing students’ perspective.

국내 병원의 주요 환자안전지표 적용에 대한 연구: 2017-2021 퇴원손상심층조사 자료를 이용하여

국내 병원의 주요 환자안전지표 적용에 대한 연구: 2017-2021 퇴원손상심층조사 자료를 이용하여

Perioperative patient safety indicators-A Delphi study.

To identify, define and achieve consensus on perioperative patient safety indicators within a Swedish context. A modified Delphi method. A purposeful sample of 22 experts, all experienced operating room nurse specialists, was recruited for this study. A questionnaire was constructed incorporating statements derived from a preceding study. The experts were asked to rate the importance of each statement concerning patient safety during the perioperative phase. The data collection occurred through an online survey platform between November 2022 and April 2023. The CREDES checklist guided the reporting of this study. The three-round Delphi study resulted in consensus on 73 statements out of 103, encompassing 74% process indicators and 26% structure indicators. Key areas of consensus included the use of the Surgical Safety Checklist and optimizing the operating room environment. Consensus was reached on perioperative safety indicators, underscoring the intricate challenges involved in ensuring patient safety in the operating room. It emphasizes the important integration of both structure and process indicators for comprehensive safety assessment during surgical procedures. Recognizing the difficulty in measuring factors like teamwork and communication, essential for patient safety, the study offers practical guidance. It underlines a balanced approach and specific consensus areas applicable in clinical practice to enhance perioperative patient safety. This study provides concrete practice guidance and establishes a structured framework for evaluating perioperative care processes. It emphasizes the critical role of professionals having the necessary skills and being present during surgical procedures. Additionally, the study underscores the paramount importance of effective communication and teamwork within the operating room team, substantively contributing to overall patient safety enhancement. The study focused on addressing the challenge of ensuring patient safety in operating rooms, acknowledging the persistent complications related to surgery despite global efforts to eliminate avoidable harm in healthcare. Consensus was reached on 73 crucial indicators for perioperative patient safety, emphasizing a balanced approach integrating both process and structure indicators for a comprehensive assessment of safety during surgical procedures. The study has a broad impact on professionals and healthcare systems, providing concrete guidance for practice and offering a structured process for evaluating perioperative care. The study is reported informed by 'Guidance on Conducting and REporting DElphi Studies (CREDES) in palliative care: Recommendations derived from a methodological systematic review'. No patient or public contribution.

The Transparency in Nurses’ Work Environment and the Patient Safety

Transparency in nursing work environments is pivotal for enhancing patient safety and improving care quality. This study aims to identify work-related factors that influence nursing transparency and patient safety in a hospital setting. Employing a quantitative, non-experimental descriptive approach, this study surveyed 260 nurses from a pool of 800 at an educational hospital using an electronic questionnaire. The questionnaire assessed patient safety indicators, incident reporting transparency, work environment, and perceptions of patient safety culture. Data were analyzed using SPSS. The research highlights a significant correlation between work environments and transparency in incident reporting. Results indicated that better work environments are associated with higher levels of transparency and safety culture perception. The study also found that personal involvement in errors was underreported, suggesting a gap in the desired transparent culture. Enhancing the nursing work environment is crucial for improving transparency and patient safety, and strategic improvements in these areas can significantly bolster overall healthcare quality.

917: Patient Safety in German Radiation Oncology (PaSaGeRO): A Review on Patient Safety Indicators.

917: Patient Safety in German Radiation Oncology (PaSaGeRO): A Review on Patient Safety Indicators.

Patient Safety Indicators at an Academic Veterans Affairs Hospital: Addressing Dual Goals of Clinical Care and Validity

Hospital-acquired complications add to patient morbidity and mortality, costs, length of stay, and negative patient experience. Patient Safety Indicators (PSIs) are a validated and widely used metric to evaluate hospital administrative data on preventing these events. Although many studies have addressed PSI validity, few have aimed to reduce PSI through clinical care. The authors aimed to reduce PSI events by addressing both validity and clinical care. Frontline clinicians used a deep dive template to provide input on all PSI cases, which were then reviewed by a PSI task force to identify performance gaps. After analyzing the frequency of gaps and cost-vs.-impact of potential solutions, five interventions were implemented to address the three most common, highly weighted PSIs: pressure ulcers, postoperative venous thromboembolism (VTE), and postoperative sepsis. Clinical care interventions included increasing patient mobility by creating a specialized mobility technician position, skin care audits to prevent pressure ulcers, and increasing use of pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis. Administrative interventions addressed improving clinician-coding concordance for sepsis and increasing documentation of comorbidities. After interventions, the number of PSI events for composite PSI, VTE, and sepsis decreased by 41.3% (p = 0.039), 85.2% (p = 0.0091), and 51.5% (p = 0.063), respectively, relative to the preintervention period. Pressure ulcers increased by 33.3% (p = 0.0091). Hospital complications cause substantial burden to hospitals, patients, and caregivers. Addressing administrative and clinical factors with targeted interventions led to reduction in composite PSI. Further efforts are needed locally to reduce the pressure ulcer PSI.

330 Accuracy and Clinical Significance of Neurosurgical Patient Safety Indicator Events Reported by Centers for Medicare Services

INTRODUCTION: Data on patient safety indicator (PSI) events are used by Center for Medicare Services (CMS) for determining reimbursement to hospitals, and public quality reporting. It is unclear whether the process used by CMS to detect PSI events is accurate, and whether PSI events affect clinical outcomes in neurosurgical patients. METHODS: We reviewed CMS reported PSI events in neurosurgical patients at our hospital from July 1, 2018, through December 31, 2019. Discharge billing codes were reviewed in order to assess whether CMS criteria for PSI were met. Charts were reviewed by experienced clinicians in order to assess the accuracy and clinical significance of CMS reported PSI events. For deep venous thrombosis/pulmonary embolism (DVT/PE) PSI events, chart reviews were performed in order to assess whether standard of care prophylaxis was administered. RESULTS: 14 PSI events were reported in 11 patients, representing 1.3% of neurosurgical procedures in fee for service medicare patients. 7 patients underwent spinal surgery and 4 underwent cranial surgery. PSI events included DVT/PE (n = 6), postoperative hematoma (n = 2), postoperative respiratory failure (n = 5), and iatrogenic pneumothorax (n = 1). Only 10/14 PSI events (71%) met CMS criteria based on discharge billing codes, and only 8/14 PSI events (57%) met CMS criteria based on chart review. All PSI events that were confirmed based on chart review required specific medical or surgical treatment, but only 5 (63%) led to increased length of stay, and no patients had residual adverse effects at hospital discharge. 5/6 patients with chart confirmed DVT/PE (83%) received standard of care DVT prophylaxis. CONCLUSIONS: CMS-reported PSI events have significant rates of inaccuracy. PSI events may not correlate with meaningful adverse clinical outcomes. DVT/PE PSI events were not associated with breaches in standard of care.

Rounds Redesign: Our Experience In Splitting Interdisciplinary Rounds

Our hospital developed and implemented a major redesign of interdisciplinary rounds in order to achieve more efficient interdisciplinary communication in this challenging post-COVID era. The goal was to involve all key participants in a structured initiative to improve discharge planning, review important patient safety indicators, and enhance patient-physician communication. The comprehensive redesign, based on the Institute for Healthcare Improvement model, restructured the rounds into two distinct components: interdisciplinary disposition and clinical rounds. This new, dichotomous structure resulted in improved median discharge time, better identified estimated date of discharge and streamlined communication among care team providers. Combined with second rounds by physicians on patients getting discharged, there was an improvement in patient experience domains.

Patient Safety Indicators During the Initial COVID-19 Pandemic Surge in the United States.

The COVID-19 pandemic presented a challenge to inpatient safety. It is unknown whether there were spillover effects due to COVID-19 into non-COVID-19 care and safety. We sought to evaluate the changes in inpatient Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality patient safety indicators (PSIs) in the United States before and during the first surge of the pandemic among patients admitted without COVID-19. We analyzed trends in PSIs from January 2019 to June 2020 in patients without COVID-19 using data from IBM MarketScan Commercial Database. We included members of employer-sponsored or Medicare supplemental health plans with inpatient, non-COVID-19 admissions. The primary outcomes were risk-adjusted composite and individual PSIs. We analyzed 1,869,430 patients admitted without COVID-19. Among patients without COVID-19, the composite PSI score was not significantly different when comparing the first surge (Q2 2020) to the prepandemic period (e.g., Q2 2020 score of 2.46 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 2.34-2.58] versus Q1 2020 score of 2.37 [95% CI, 2.27-2.46]; P = 0.22). Individual PSIs for these patients during Q2 2020 were also not significantly different, except in-hospital fall with hip fracture (e.g., Q2 2020 was 3.42 [95% CI, 3.34-3.49] versus Q4 2019 was 2.45 [95% CI, 2.40-2.50]; P = 0.01). The first surge of COVID-19 was not associated with worse inpatient safety for patients without COVID-19, highlighting the ability of the healthcare system to respond to the initial surge of the pandemic.

Prevalence, risk factors and impact of delirium in adult inpatients in a tertiary care hospital: A point prevalence study.

To describe the point prevalence, risk factors and possible outcomes of delirium in inpatients. A cross-sectional point prevalence study. Delirium is an acute brain syndrome that negatively affects patients, healthcare professionals and institutions alike; it is common in inpatient settings and is preventable in about one third of cases. Although guidelines recommend systematic screening and assessment, delirium is often unrecognised, undiagnosed and uncoded. There is a lack of valid data on this patient safety indicator in German-speaking countries. The study was conducted in a tertiary care hospital in Switzerland on 5 July 2022. Specially trained registered nurses collected data from all patients meeting the inclusion criteria using CAM, ICDSC or mCAM-ED. Data were analysed descriptively with stratification by delirium status, setting and surgery. The point prevalence across all settings was 6.9% (27/390), with large variation between settings: ICU 28.6% (4/14), IMC 28.0% (7/25), wards 4.6% (15/326) and ED 4% (1/25). Surgical patients were almost twice as likely to be affected as medical patients (8.9% vs. 4.8%). Patients with delirium differed most clearly from those without by having a larger number of ICD-10 F-diagnoses, a larger number of medications and higher age, which are known risk factors. Moreover, those with delirium had more missed diagnoses, increased mortality, more adverse events and higher costs. A significant number of patients experienced delirium and adverse clinical outcomes. Missed delirium diagnoses may further jeopardise patient safety and result in lost revenue. It remains unclear to what extent the risk factors and effects of delirium are causal and what determinants underlie missed diagnoses. Consistent identification of high-risk patients and treatment settings with elevated risk, accompanied by the implementation of effective preventive and management strategies, is critical to addressing delirium.

Relationship between patient safety indicator events and hospital location for inpatient hysterectomy.

Previous studies suggest surgical quality outcomes are similar between rural and urban hospitals, but data about gynecology in rural hospitals is sparse. This was a retrospective cohort study utilizing the National Inpatient Sample database from the Agency of Healthcare Research and Quality. Patients who underwent benign hysterectomy for non-prolapse indications between 2012-2016 were identified using ICD-9 and 10 codes. Patients were stratified into rural or urban non-teaching groups; urban teaching hospitals were the referent group. The primary outcome was the rate of patient safety indicator (PSI) events. PSI events were identified using ICD-9 and 10 codes. Statistical analysis was performed using analysis of variance and uni- and multivariate Poisson regressions. 154,810 patients met all inclusion criteria. The cumulative rate of PSI events was 11.9% at rural hospitals, 13.9% at urban non-teaching hospitals and 16.9% at urban teaching hospitals, P<0.001. The most common PSI events were postoperative metabolic derangement, hemorrhage, and accidental puncture. The rate of transfusion was highest in urban teaching hospitals (6.7%) and similar for rural (5.1%) and urban non-teaching hospitals (5.5%), P<0.001. The rate of genitourinary tract injury was between 1.4-1.6%, and similar across sites, P=0.89. After adjusting for confounders, the risk of PSI events was similar across locations. The risk of transfusion was lower at rural hospitals (aRR=0.84, 95% CI: 0.74-0.94). Hysterectomy performed at rural hospitals, typically thought of as having low surgical volume compared to urban hospitals, is associated with similar risk of PSI events and lower risk of transfusion.

Prevalence of pressure injury on the medical wards of public general hospitals in Kuwait: a national cross-sectional study

BackgroundPressure injury is a severe problem that can significantly impact a patient’s health, quality of life, and healthcare expenses. The prevalence of pressure injuries is a widely used clinical indicator of patient safety and quality of care. This study aims to address the research gap that exists on this topic in Kuwait by investigating the prevalence of pressure injuries and preventive measures on the medical wards of the country’s public general hospitals.MethodsA cross-sectional research design was adopted to measure the point prevalence of pressure injuries on 54 medical wards in the public general hospitals. Data, including variables pertaining to hospitals, patients, pressure injuries and preventive practices, were collected using an online form. The data were processed and analysed using Microsoft Excel and SPSS 23 (α level = 0.05). Analysis provided an overview of patient, pressure injury characteristics and preventive measures, and the relationships between the patient and pressure injury characteristics and the prevalence of pressure injuries. A model for predicting the determinants of pressure injury prevalence was constructed from a linear regression analysis.ResultsThe mean national prevalence of pressure injury was 17.6% (95% CI: 11.3–23.8). Purely community-acquired pressure injuries represent the majority of pressure injuries nationally (58.1%). Regarding preventive measures, “pressure injury assessment on admission” has been provided to 65.5% of patients. Correlation analysis revealed that the only statistically significant correlation with the prevalence of hospital-acquired pressure injury was “pressure injury assessment on admission”, which was strongly negative (ρ = −0.857). Therefore, this was the only variable included in the regression analysis as a predictor of pressure injury prevalence (Beta = 0.839). The results showed many statistically significant differences between hospitals with respect to the variables studied.ConclusionsThe national pressure injury prevalence is high compared to the global rate. The higher percentage of purely community-acquired pressure injuries requires particular attention. Many risk factors for the development of pressure injuries are public health concerns, and effective mitigating strategies are needed. Further research is required to assess the knowledge, attitude, and behaviour of nurses with respect to pressure injuries, and to evaluate preventive and management practices.