Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation Score Research Articles

Cast-OFF 2: one week versus three to five weeks of plaster cast immobilization for non-or minimally displaced distal radius fractures, a stepped wedge cluster randomized controlled trial.

Implementation of one week of cast immobilization followed by gradually increasing wrist mobilization for non- or minimally displaced DRF and comparison of the functional outcomes and pain scores with the usual care (three to five weeks of cast immobilization). Design: A randomized stepped wedge cluster design, prospective cohort. Academic and peripheral hospitals in level 1, 2, and 3 trauma centers. All patients between 18 and 85 years old with an isolated non- or minimally and nonreduced DRF were eligible for inclusion. Participating hospitals were randomized to transition from usual care (three to five weeks of cast immobilization) to one week of cast immobilization, following the stepped wedge design. Patient characteristics, secondary dislocation, surgical treatment, visual analog scale (VAS), Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE), Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Pain Interference (PROMIS-PI), Pain Catastrophizing Scale 4 (PCS-4), and patient satisfaction were compared between control, and intervention group at week 1, 3-5, 6, month 3, 6, and 12. A difference around 11 points on the PRWE scale was considered clinically significant. 402 patients were included (control n=197 vs intervention n=205, 267/135, female/male). There were no differences in age (53.7 ± 18.6 vs 53.3 ± 19.5, P = 0.27), sex (66% vs 67% female, P 0.44), dominant hand fractured (44% vs 53%, P 0.39), and type of fracture (39% vs 41% extra-articular, P = 0.44) After six weeks, the PRWE score showed no clinically significant differences (-4.5 [CI -12.9, 4.02], P = 0.30). No significant differences were observed for function, pain scores, and patient satisfaction between groups (all P > 0.05). Furthermore, there was no significant difference in secondary dislocation rate (control 1.5% vs intervention 1.0%, p=0.32, P = 0.32) and operation rate (control 1.5% versus 1.5% intervention P = 0.92). This study compared one week of cast immobilization followed by gradually increasing wrist mobilizationto the usual care of three to five weeks for nonreduced DRF. No clinically significant differences in function, pain scores, patient satisfaction, secondary dislocation, and operations were observed. Therefore, one week of plaster immobilization can be safely recommended for the non- or minimally displaced and nonreduced DRF treatment. Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Surgical Treatment of Periarticular Distal Radius Fracture in Elderly: A Systematic Review

Background/Objectives: The treatment of periarticular distal radius fractures remains challenging. Different surgical treatment options have been proposed as alternatives to conservative treatment. This systematic review aims to compare the functional outcomes, radiological outcomes, and complications among volar locking plates (VLPs), Kirschner-wire fixations, and external fixations (EFs) for distal radius fractures in patients aged 60 years and older. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, Cochrane, and Science Direct databases assessing the effects of VLP, EF, and K-wire treatments for distal radius fractures in patients aged 60 years and over. The primary outcome was the evaluation of the range of motion (ROM) degrees after three surgical procedures, trying to assess the best treatment option. The secondary outcome included evaluation of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score, quick-DASH score, Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) score, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score, grip strength, radiographic assessment, and complications comparing VLPs, EFs and K-wires. Results: A total of 23 studies were included, comparing VLP, EF, and K-wire fixation. The overall population comprised 5618 patients, with 4690 females and 1015 males, of which 4468 patients were treated with VLP, 503 with EF, and 647 with K-wire. The most common complications among the VLP group were complex regional pain syndrome (7.5%) and carpal tunnel syndrome (6.8%); for the EF group, infections (9.8%) and carpal tunnel syndrome (6.8%); and for the K-wire group, carpal tunnel syndrome (7.5%) and infections (6.9%). Conclusions: VLP showed better clinical outcomes in the first few months after treatment. However, these differences decreased over time and became similar after one year. EF and K-wire fixations remain easier to manage during surgery.

Impact of teardrop angle correction on functional outcomes in die punch fractures of the distal radius: retrospective study

Background: Anatomic reduction of die punch fractures of the distal radius is crucial to optimize functional outcomes. The teardrop angle, formed by the volar cortex and articular surface, reflects distal radius alignment and articular congruity. This study evaluated the relationship between teardrop angle correction and clinical/functional results following surgical fixation of these injuries. Methods: This retrospective study included patients undergoing open reduction and internal fixation for die punch distal radius fractures between 2015-2020. Patients were divided into two groups based on teardrop angle correction: group 1 (≤10°) and group 2 (>10°). Disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) scores, patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE) scores, range of motion, and grip strength were assessed at final follow-up (minimum 12 months). Multivariate analysis identified predictors of functional outcomes. Results: 60 patients were included (32 in group 1, 28 in group 2). Groups were similar in baseline demographics and injury characteristics. Group 2 (>10° correction) had significantly better outcomes including lower DASH scores (14.5 versus 24.6, p=0.003), lower PRWE scores (21.6 versus 36.8, p=0.002), greater grip strength (84.6% versus 71.2%, p=0.005), increased flexion (62.5° versus 52.7°, p=0.004), and extension range of motion (55.8° versus 43.5°, p<0.001). On multivariate analysis, greater teardrop angle correction was an independent predictor of improved DASH and PRWE scores. Conclusions: Obtaining >10° of teardrop angle correction during surgical fixation of die punch distal radius fractures correlated with superior functional outcome scores, grip strength, and mobility compared to ≤10° of correction. These findings emphasize the importance of restoring distal radius anatomy and articular congruity in this injury pattern. Precise intraoperative correction of the teardrop angle deformity should be a key goal.

The Effect of Patient-Reported Allergies on Patient-Reported Outcomes in Carpal Tunnel Release.

Patient-reported allergies have been shown to be a risk factor for poor surgical outcomes in a variety of orthopedic procedures. The relationship between patient-reported allergies and outcomes in carpal tunnel surgery remains unclear. A retrospective electronic medical chart review was conducted on 390 patients who underwent primary carpal tunnel releases, without concomitant procedures, who completed preoperative and postoperative Quick Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand or Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation scores, with a minimum of 1-year follow-up. Patient demographic data and patient-reported outcome measures were collected. Patients were grouped based on the number of allergies reported (≤3 allergies or ≥4 allergies), and statistical analysis was performed. Three hundred and ninety patients were included in the analysis (347 patients [89.0%] with ≤3 allergies; 43 patients [11.0%] with ≥4 allergies). Patients were predominantly female (n = 243, 62.3%), and the median age at surgery was 61 years. Patients with ≥4 allergies were more likely to be female (88.4% vs 59.1%), older (64.3 years vs 60.3 years), and more likely to be taking psychotropic medication (51.2% vs 28.2%). No differences were seen in patient-reported outcomes at any time point preoperatively or postoperatively, with both groups showing similar postoperative improvement. Patients with a high number of reported allergies have similar improvement in patient-reported outcomes following carpal tunnel release as low-allergy cohorts.

Comparison of surgical and conservative therapy in older patients with distal radius fracture: a prospective randomized clinic al trial

IntroductionThe distal radius fracture is considered the most common fracture in humans. For fractures classified as Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthese (AO) 23-C1 + C2, there is no consensus on treatment in older patients due to inconsistent study results. The aim of this study was to compare conservative and surgical treatment in relation to wrist function and satisfaction in patients older than 65 years.MethodsIn this prospective randomized clinical trial, patients aged older than 65 years who suffered an isolated AO-classified C1 or C2 distal radius fracture were randomized to surgical treatment using palmar plate osteosynthesis or conservative treatment. Patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE) score and disabilities of arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) was assessed 3, 6 and 12 months post-interventionally. Satisfaction, range of motion (ROM) and pain scores were evaluated at 6 weeks and 3, 6 and 12 months post-interventionally.ResultsA total of 80 patients with a mean age of 77.3 years (± 6.1 years) in the conservative group and 72.5 years (± 5.3 years) in the surgery group were included. Both the PRWE score, and the DASH score showed a statistically significant difference between the two groups after 3 months, 6 months and 12 months (p < 0.001). Patients in the surgical cohort showed a statistically significant higher satisfaction at the 6-week, 6-month and 12-month follow-up (p < 0.001 6 weeks + 12 months; p = 0.004 6 months).ConclusionIn this prospective randomized study, surgical treatment proved to be superior to conservative treatment in terms of the primary outcome variable PRWE score. Satisfaction was significantly better in the surgical group.

A Comparison Between Volar Locking Plates and Percutaneous Pinning in the Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures: A Systematic Review

Percutaneous fixation with Kirschner wires and open reduction and internal fixation with volar locking plates are the most common surgical techniques for managing distal radius fractures (DRFs). As the superiority of either technique is yet to be established, we aimed to conduct an updated systematic review to compare these techniques for the optimal management of unstable DRFs. We conducted a comprehensive literature search to identify studies comparing fixation outcomes for DRFs between groups treated with Kirschner wires and those treated with volar locking plates. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. The revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool was used to assess the methodological quality of RCTs. Meta-analyses were performed only on outcome measures that were reported at the same time points using the same metrics across three or more RCTs. Evaluated outcomes included the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score, grip strength, wrist range of motion, and radiological outcomes. We also assessed the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) score and incidence of complications. Fourteen RCTs with 2,226 patients were included in the meta-analysis. DASH scores were significantly lower in the plating group at all time points. PRWE outcomes favored the plating group at follow-ups greater than 1 year. There were no significant differences in radiological outcomes or incidence of complications between the two groups. Although the plating group provided marginally better functional outcomes at 1 year after surgery, the K-wire group remained a viable alternative. The reported differences should be interpreted cautiously because of the inherent variability of the included RCTs. High-quality RCTs with strict inclusion criteria and standard postoperative protocols are essential to generalize our results across all age groups and fracture types to overcome our study's limitations. Therapy/Prevention, Etiology/Harm II.

Outcome of Trapeziectomy and Ligament Reconstruction and Tendon Interposition for Patients Aged Less Than 56 Years: A Retrospective Study With a Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up

The purpose of this study was to determine the long-term consequences of trapeziectomy and ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition (LRTI) for trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis in patients aged less than 56 years. A retrospective study was performed to investigate the outcome of trapeziectomy and LRTI with a follow-up period of greater than 5 years in patients aged less than 56 years at the time of surgery. Patients completed the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH), the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE), and a 10-point visual analog score for pain (VAS). Objective assessments included thumb opposition, palmar and radial abduction angles, and grip, lateral key, and thumb tip pinch strengths. Radiographic assessments of the thumb carpometacarpal joint were performed in three planes, and the trapezial space and trapezial space to metacarpal height ratios were calculated. Between January 2005 and December 2017, 105 patients were treated. Forty-eight patients with 58 thumbs returned for review. The mean patient age at the time of surgery was 52.5 years, and 96% of the patients were women. The mean follow-up period from surgery was 11 years. The mean VAS score was 1. A significant association was found between younger age at the time of surgery and increased proximal migration of the metacarpal, between high VAS pain scores and high PRWE and DASH scores, weak grip, lateral key pinch and thumb tip pinch strength, and Kapandji score, and between the follow-up period and increasing VAS pain, PRWE, and DASH scores. Trapeziectomy and LRTI are effective procedures for patients aged less than 56 years. The benefits of surgery should be balanced against the deterioration in the outcome measures of DASH and PRWE and increasing VAS scores with increasing intervals from surgery. Therapeutic IV.

The association between smartphone addiction and thumb/wrist pain among medical students of Jazan University, Saudi Arabia, A cross-sectional study.

The past decade has witnessed a revolution in smartphones owing to their growing importance and various applications. However, excessive usage can lead to addiction and joint pain in the wrist/thumb area. Despite these negative effects, smartphones offer medical students access to the resources they need. To determine the association between smartphone addiction and thumb/wrist pain among undergraduate students of Jazan University. A cross-sectional self-administrated, online survey and online convenience sample technique was used. The collected data were analyzed using SPSS Software. This survey included 337 participants, of which two-thirds were female (66.8%) and the rest male (33.2%); 32.6% of the respondents were studying in the College of Medicine. Of the 337 participants, 32% reported experiencing pain in their wrists or at the back of their neck while using a smartphone. The study found an average Smartphone Addition Scale-Short Version (SAS-SV) score of 32.5 ± 8.0 out of 50 and a total Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation score of 48.8 ± 14.7, with a pain score of 13.3 ± 11.0 and a function score of 35.5 ± 11.7. The study also revealed a significant association between smartphone addiction and thumb/wrist pain (P value = 0.029), with females and students of the College of Applied Medical Science associated with higher SAS-SV scores, thereby indicating higher smartphone addiction. Significant correlation exists between smartphone addiction and thumb/wirst pain among medical students of Jazan University.

Serial Range of Motion and Grip Strength Measurements, Patient-Reported Outcomes, and Radiographic Thresholds Associated With Less Satisfactory Outcomes After Low-Energy Distal Radius Fracture in Women Aged 50 Years and Older

To document the change of clinical (wrist motion and grip strength) measurements and Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) scores at 9 weeks and 3, 6, and 12 months after distal radius fracture (DRF) in women 50 years and older with exclusively isolated, displaced, and low-energy DRFs treated by either closed and/or open reduction and to relate these outcomes to their radiographic results. In this retrospective single-institution cohort study, patients' post-DRF clinical measurements and PRWE scores were prospectively collected from December 2007 through September 2018 and stratified according to their final radiographic values of volar/dorsal tilt, ulnar variance, and radial inclination. Of the 1,319 women identified, 1,126 (85%) were treated nonsurgically, and 193 (15%) were treated operatively. At 12 months, patients averaged restoration (ratio of injured and uninjured sides' values) of 96% pronation, 95% extension, 91% supination, 81% flexion, and 80% (77% nondominant, 85% dominant) grip strength. The mean PRWE score was 39.5 at week 9 and 14.4 at 12 months with 54% of patients scoring <10 and 13% scoring zero. The mean volar/dorsal tilt, ulnar variance, and radial inclination values in those treated nonsurgically were 1.4° dorsal,+3.9 mm, and 18.0°, respectively. Analogous values in patients treated surgically were 6° volar,+2.6 mm, and 22°, respectively. Volar tilt ≥25°, dorsal tilt >10°, ulnar variance >+7.5 mm, and radial inclination ≤13° were thresholds beyond which motion and grip strength were reduced and/or PRWE scores increased. In general, older patients experienced more residual deformity and were less likely to have undergone surgery. Generally, outcomes were satisfactory for patients with radiographic results within identified thresholds for acceptable fracture reduction. Outcomes were significantly less favorable for patients with radiographic results beyond these thresholds; for these patients, early surgical intervention should be considered. Low-energy DRFs should prompt bone density investigation. Therapeutic 2b.

Functional and Radiological Outcomes Following Arthroscopic-Assisted Reduction and Fixation of Intra-Articular Distal Radius Fractures

Abstract Background: Intra-articular distal radius fractures (DRFs) are prevalent injuries that are usually difficult to treat and rehabilitate. These injuries may be associated with ligamentous injuries or intra-articular loose fragments. This study aims to assess the functional and radiological results of using arthroscopic-assisted reduction and fixation, which offers direct visualization of the joint surface, evaluation of intra-articular ligaments, and removal of loose fragments, potentially enhancing recovery outcomes. Patients and Methods: This quasi-experimental interventional study evaluated the functional and radiological outcomes of arthroscopic-assisted reduction and fixation for intra-articular DRFs. The study included 26 patients who met specific inclusion criteria, and data collection involved preoperative assessment, patient preparation, operative measures, postoperative care, and follow-up evaluations using various scoring systems. Results: The range of motion showed a significant (P &lt; 0.001) improvement over the study duration: flexion increased from 42.81° ± 11.81° at 6 weeks to 54.23° ± 14.95° at 12 months, and extension improved from 56.88° ± 13.28° to 68.38° ± 13.43°. In addition, there was a significant reduction in disability and wrist-related symptoms, as indicated by improvements in the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) scores (6 weeks: 25.80 ± 15.85 vs. 12 months: 5.27 ± 8.61; P &lt; 0.01) and Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) scores at the same follow-up intervals (6 weeks: 46.04 ± 22.49 vs. 12 months: 9.54 ± 12.03; P &lt; 0.001). Chronic illness and injuries like triangular fibrocartilage complex tears affected outcomes negatively. Age, ulnar variance, and palmar tilt were significantly correlated with DASH and PRWE scores. Conclusion: Arthroscopic-assisted reduction and fixation for intra-articular DRFs resulted in favorable outcomes regarding the range of motion, disability, and wrist-related symptoms. Further research and long-term follow-up studies are recommended to validate the positive outcomes of arthroscopic-assisted reduction and fixation for intra-articular DRFs, compare it with other surgical approaches, and assess its economic implications.

Intra-Articular Corrective Osteotomy for Distal Radial Intra-Articular Malunion Using Patient-Matched Instruments: A Prospective, Multicenter, Open-Label, Single-Arm Trial.

Corrective osteotomy for intra-articular malunion is a challenging procedure. However, recent advancements, including patient-matched instruments created on the basis of preoperative computer simulation, enable accurate intra-articular correction. We hypothesized that intra-articular corrective osteotomy using patient-matched instruments for the treatment of distal radial intra-articular malunion would reduce intra-articular deformity and restore wrist function at 12 months of follow-up. This prospective study included 12 patients with distal radial intra-articular malunion who underwent intra-articular corrective osteotomy external to the joint using patient-matched instruments. The primary end point was the maximum step-off on the articular surface of the distal radius, measured with use of computed tomography (CT), with an expected postoperative value of ≤1.5 mm. The secondary end points included the gap of the articular surface; range of motion; grip strength; pain evaluated using a visual analog scale (VAS); patient satisfaction; Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score; and Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) score. A mean postoperative step-off of ≤1.5 mm for the primary end point was assessed with use of the 1-sample t test. The secondary end points were assessed with use of the Dunnett multiple comparison test. The average step-off significantly improved from 3.75 ± 1.04 mm preoperatively to 0.51 ± 0.40 mm at the 52-week postoperative follow-up and was maintained within 1.5 mm. The average wrist and forearm range of motion, VAS score, grip strength, DASH score, and PRWE score significantly improved. Eleven patients were either very satisfied or satisfied with their outcomes. The use of patient-matched instruments could contribute to improving postoperative outcomes of intra-articular corrective osteotomy procedures involving the distal radius. Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Medium-Term Patient-Reported Outcomes after Surgical Management of Perilunate Injury: A Multiinstitutional Experience

Abstract Background There is a lack of consensus on the optimal treatment of perilunate injuries (PLIs). Open reduction with internal fixation with scapholunate (SL) ligament repair is recommended; however, procedures such as lunotriquetral (LT) ligament repair, carpal tunnel release (CTR), proximal row carpectomy, denervation, and arthrodesis may also be used. Purpose The purpose of this study was to assess patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after surgical management of PLIs. Methods A retrospective review of surgically treated PLIs at two institutions in a major metropolitan city from 2014 to 2020 was conducted. Demographics, radiographic data, and details of surgical management were reviewed. PROs were prospectively collected and analyzed. Results Eighty-seven patients with surgically managed PLIs were identified. The average time to surgery was 4 ± 7days. Twenty-six percent of patients presented with acute median neuropathy. Thirty-seven patients provided PROs for analysis. Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation scores were 22 ± 12.9, 14.4 ± 11.3, and 37 ± 22 for pain, function, and total scores, respectively. Satisfaction was 7 ± 3 Sixteen percent of patients were unable to maintain employment due to their injury. The interval to return to work was 6.3 ± 7.7 months. Conclusion PLIs cause significant morbidity and affect patients' ability to return to work. While open reduction with SL repair is routinely performed to treat PLIs, additional procedures may be considered. Undergoing concurrent CTR in the absence of neurological symptoms showed no differences in outcomes. Level of Evidence Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Long-Term Patient-Reported Outcomes following Proximal Row Carpectomy.

Background Proximal row carpectomy (PRC) is a procedure used for pain relief from arthrosis that preserves some degree of range of motion (ROM). Dorsal capsular interposition (DCI) is an option for cases where some chondral loss of the capitate is present. Purposes The aim of this study is to assess what factors influence long-term patient-reported outcomes following PRC and specifically to evaluate the role of DCI. Additionally, this study aims to report the long-term postoperative ROM in patients with DCI. Methods Patients who underwent PRC in the period between 2002 and 2017 were retrospectively identified, resulting in a cohort of 162 patients. Patient-reported outcomes were obtained using validated questionnaires and were completed by 59 patients at a median follow-up time of 8.5 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 6.0-13). Multivariable linear regression was performed to identify factors independently associated with patient-reported outcomes. Results The median PRWE (Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation) score was 17 (IQR: 5.5-52), the median QuickDASH (Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) score was 16 (IQR: 4.5-39), and the median NRS (Numeric Rating Scale) Pain score was 1 (IQR: 0-3). The mean flexion-extension ROM was 70 ± 24 degrees. After correcting for gender, involvement of the capitate cartilage was independently associated with worse QuickDASH scores. Conclusions PRC is associated with good functional outcomes and pain control at long-term follow-up. This generally also applied to patients who underwent DCI; however, the role of DCI in those with capitate cartilage injury remains unclear. Preexistent damage to the capitate cartilage was associated with worse QuickDASH scores. Level of Evidence II, Prognostic study.

Comparing Open and Arthroscopic Grafting for Scaphoid Nonunion: Is There Truly a Noticeable Difference?

Scaphoid nonunion remains a challenging injury with no clear consensus on treatment. Surgical options, such as bone grafting procedures, are available for the treatment of scaphoid nonunions. While open grafting provides direct visualization, it is theoretically believed to lead to several problems due to the complex ligamentous structure responsible for wrist stability and challenges in the vascular supply of the scaphoid. On the other hand, despite its technical challenges, arthroscopic grafting is thought to avoid complications by preserving surrounding tissues. (1) Do patients undergoing bone grafting via arthroscopy for scaphoid nonunion report better function than patients undergoing an open procedure? (2) Do patients undergoing bone grafting via arthroscopy for scaphoid nonunion demonstrate better objective outcomes, such as ROM, extremity strength, and bony union? Between January 2012 and January 2022, we operated on 141 patients with scaphoid nonunion. The following patients were excluded from this study: 33 patients with scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse and arthritis, 18 patients with proximal pole fractures, 5 patients with previous surgeries, 16 patients with avascular necrosis, and 8 patients with the radius used as a graft source. In total, 28 patients underwent open grafting, and 33 patients underwent arthroscopic grafting; for both groups, the iliac crest was used as the graft source. Two patients with nonunion were observed in each treatment group, and they were excluded from the study. Results from the remaining 26 patients treated with open grafting and 31 patients treated with arthroscopic grafting (totaling 57 patients) were analyzed. The decision to treat patients with open or arthroscopic methods was not based on a particular reason. In our clinic, we initially preferred open grafting for treating nonunion of the scaphoid. Subsequently, we began to prefer arthroscopic methods for the treatment of these injuries. Twenty patients in the arthroscopic group had additional ligamentous injuries, which were simultaneously treated arthroscopically. All patients in both groups had at least 1 year of follow-up, but 48% of patients treated arthroscopically and 42% of those treated with open approaches were lost before 2 years of follow-up. The remaining patients had follow-up periods longer than 24 months. Our primary analysis was performed at 1 year, and we did a secondary analysis at 2 years. We compared the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE), QuickDASH, and VAS scores of the patients. We also compared ROM and grip and pinch strength in patients' contralateral wrists. We used predefined, evidence-based thresholds for the minimum clinically important differences for these outcome measures. According to the 1-year functional analysis, we found no clinically important difference between the open surgery group and the arthroscopic surgery group in terms of PRWE score (median [IQR] 19 [25] versus 8 [9], difference of medians 11; p = 0.001), QuickDASH (median 14 [23] versus 7 [11], difference of medians 7; p = 0.004), and VAS scores (median 2 [2] versus 1 [1], difference of medians 1; p = 0.02). At 1 year, there were no differences in objective measurements, including grip strength (median 81 [16] versus 85 [14], difference of medians 4; p = 0.60), pinch strength (median 82 [18] versus 81 [15], difference of medians 1; p = 0.85), and ROM (flexion-extension median 83 [22] versus 85 [13], difference of medians 2; p = 0.74; radial deviation-ulnar deviation median 80 [36] versus 85 [14], difference of medians 5; p = 0.61). In the 2-year analysis, no clinically important difference was observed in terms of PRWE score, and no differences were found in terms of QuickDASH, VAS, strength tests, and ROM between the open and arthroscopic groups. No difference was observed in the union rates between the open group and the arthroscopic group (93% [26 of 28] versus 94% [31 of 33], OR 1.19 [95% CI 0.16 to 9.06]; p = 0.86). In comparing open surgical procedures with arthroscopic techniques for the treatment of scaphoid nonunions, the present study revealed no differences in functional outcomes and objective measures such as ROM and strength tests at both the 1-year and 2-year follow-up visits. Although technically more challenging, arthroscopy provides a potential advantage, such as addressing concomitant ligament injuries simultaneously. However, patients did not perceive a difference between the two surgical methods. In future studies, investigating long-term outcomes in a larger population will contribute to better elucidating this issue. Level III, therapeutic study.

Does Platelet-Rich Plasma Deserve a Role in Accelerating the Recovery of Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy Following Distal Radius Fracture?

This study was to evaluate the efficacy of multiple platelet-rich plasma injections in reflex sympathetic dystrophy following distal radius fracture after previous various treatments have failed. This comparative prospective study was designed for 64 patients of reflex sympathetic dystrophy developed following distal radius fracture, from January 2009 to December 2020 were enrolled in this study. This cohort of patient was given either four multiple subcutaneous platelet-rich plasma injections at weekly interval (n = 32) or two injections in a month with 15days interval (n = 32). The primary outcome measure assessed with patient rated wrist evaluation questionnaire score. The secondary outcome was a visual analogue scale pain score. The final follow up was at 2years. p ≤ 0.05 is considered statistically. The patient rated wrist evaluation score for usual and specific activities and EQ-VAS for pain level showed statistically significant greater improvement in group A (42 21%) compared to group B (19 24%), (p = 0.37). Patients also had improvement in wrist movements with no statistically significant differences in both groups. The standard difference in means of all three functional scores was almost similar between both groups A and B (standard difference in means = 0.032; 95% CI 0.236-0.830; p = 0.495), considered clinically meaningful. This study results suggest autologous platelet-rich plasma injections seem to be safe, cost effective, efficacious algorithm treatment for reflex sympathetic dystrophy following distal radius fracture patients where previous treatments have failed.

Long-Term Outcomes of Wrist Arthroplasty Using the ReMotion™ Implant in Non-inflammatory Wrist Pathology.

Background: Wrist arthroplasty is increasingly offered to patients with symptomatic wrist arthritis as an alternative to wrist arthrodesis. The purpose of this study was to present our outcomes with the ReMotion™ wrist arthroplasty in a consecutive series of patients with wrist arthritis from non-inflammatory conditions. Methods: Thirteen (eight women, nine dominant wrists) patients, 68 (44-85) years of age with advanced radiocarpal arthritis due to SLAC/SNAC (11) and Kienbock disease (2) had a ReMotion™ (Stryker, Michigan, USA) wrist arthroplasty implanted, and were prospectively followed for 7 (4-9) years. The outcome measures included patient-rated wrist and hand evaluation (PRWHE) score, disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire (QuickDASH) score, visual analogue pain score (0-10) on the radial and ulnar aspect of the wrist at rest (VASrR/VASuR) and activity (VASrA/VASuA), active wrist range of motion (AROM) including flexion, extension, ulnar and radial deviation, pronation and supination and grip and key-pinch strength measured preoperatively and at yearly follow-ups by independent hand therapists. Results: Six patients had ten re-operations during the follow-up including four revisions to a new arthroplasty. Four were considered loose at follow-up. A significant reduction in PRWHE (63 to 12), radial pain at activity (6 to 1) and increased pronation (85° v 90°) was observed. Conclusions: We found a high complication and reoperation rate, two out of 13 had no complications or reoperations. The ReMotion™ arthroplasty should be used with caution in non-inflammatory wrist patients and the patients followed closely. A high reoperation and revision rate can be expected, and surgeons familiar with revision arthroplasty procedures should perform the surgery. Level of Evidence: Level II (Therapeutic).

Clinical Outcomes and Failure Rate of Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Foveal Repair Were Comparable between Arthroscopic and Open Techniques.

Background: This study compared clinical outcomes between arthroscopic and open repair of triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) foveal tears in chronic distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) instability patients. Methods: A total of 79 patients who had gone through foveal repair of TFCC using arthroscopic technique (n = 35) or open technique (n = 44) between 2016 and 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. The visual analog scale (VAS) score for pain, active range of motion (ROM), grip strength, Mayo Modified Wrist Score (MMWS), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire score, and Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) score at 2-4-6-12-24 months postoperatively were compared between two groups. Results: Two years after the operation, clinical parameters (VAS, MMWS, DASH, and PRWE), grip strength, and ROM showed significant advancement in the two groups in comparison to their values measured preoperatively (p < 0.001). Nonetheless, we could not identify any statistically significant differences in the above clinical factors between the two groups. The arthroscopic group showed a better flexion-extension arc at 2 months and supination-pronation arc at 2 and 4 months than the open group (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences between the two groups at 2 years postoperatively. Ten patients (12.6%) had recurrent instability (three in the arthroscopic group and seven in the open group, p = 0.499). Similarly, both groups showed no significant difference in the return to work period. Conclusions: Arthroscopic foveal repair of TFCC provided similarly favorable outcomes and early recovery of pain and ROM compared to open repair.

VARIABLE ANGLE LOCKING PLATE VERSUS MULTIPLE K WIRE FIXATION FOR INTRA-ARTICULAR DISTAL RADIUS FRACTURE: A PROSPECTIVE COMPARATIVE STUDY OF FUNCTIONAL OUTCOME IN ELDERLY

Distal radius fracture (DRF) is a common wrist injury and it accounts for about one-sixth of emergency department visits. In spite of availability of various treatment options, none is universally effective for comminuted intraarticular fracture, because of varied fractures patterns. Two commonly used surgical methods are multiple K-wire fixation and open reduction and internal fixation by variable angle locking plates. Objective of the study was to compare functional outcomes of variable angle locking plate and multiple K wire fixation for intra-articular distal radius fracture in elderly. Prospective observational study was conducted among the patients of distal radius fractures with age more than 50 years. Patients were divided in to two groups with 24 cases in each group. Group one included patients treated with variable angle locking plate and group two included patients treated with multiple K-wires. Post surgery patients were assessed at 6 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months. Evaluation was done clinically, and the outcomes were assessed by using the Disabilities Arm, Shoulder and Hand (quickDASH) score (primary outcome), Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) score, range of motion, grip strength and were compared between the groups. Patients treated with variable angle locking plate was found to have better functional outcome than those treated with multiple K-wire initially during the study, but later by the end of the study at 12 months, both groups were found to be having similar outcomes, with no significant difference between the groups. This signifies that among variable angle locking plate and multiple K-wire fixation, no single procedure is superior to the other in long term.

Establishment and preliminary evaluation of CT-based classification for distal radius fracture

Establish a new classification system of distal radius fracture based on computed tomographic (CT), and evaluate its reliability and reproducibility preliminarily, and provide a new theoretical reference for clinicians to use the clinical classification system. The imaging data and clinical data of 204 inpatients with distal radius fracture during 6 years from January 1, 2014 to January 1, 2019 in orthopaedic department were analyzed retrospectively and classified based on CT. Three observers evaluated the image data of 48 randomly selected cases based on CT at different time nodes of T1 and T2. Cohen's kappa was used to calculate the consistency. At the last follow-up, patients' Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH), Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE), and VAS scores were collected. Among 204 cases, there were 12 cases of type 1, including 6 cases of type 1-D, 4 cases of type 1-V and 2 cases of type 1-R. There were 6 cases of type 2, including 2 cases of type 2-DV, 2 cases of type 2-DR and 2 cases of type 2-VR. There were 186 cases of type 3, including 32 cases of type 3–0, 127 cases of type 3–1 and 27 cases of type 3–2. There was no significant difference in DASH, PRWE and VAS scores among all types (P > 0.05). The results of interobserver reproducibility were kappa = 0.985, ICC = 0.984 in the first evaluation, kappa = 0.986, ICC = 0.986 in the second evaluation. The results of intraobserver reproducibility were O1 = 0.991, O2 = 0.991, O3 = 0.989 respectively. The new classification system of distal radius fracture based on CT has theoretical and practical significance for incision selection, fracture reduction and internal fixation. 123 classification system is clear, comprehensive, easy to understand and remember. Moreover, it has higher interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility than other systems reported at present.

Evaluation of Patient Expectations and Outcomes after Distal Radius Fractures.

Patient expectations influence patient-reported outcomes after musculoskeletal injuries. The goal of this study is to determine how pretreatment expectations correlate with outcomes in patients with distal radius fractures. Seventy-five patients with an isolated distal radius fracture were prospectively enrolled into nonoperative and operative cohorts. The Trauma Expectation Factor-Trauma Outcome Measure (TEF-TOM) score was the primary outcome measure. Trauma Expectation Factor scores were recorded at the time of enrollment, and TOM scores were recorded at 3, 6, and 12 months. Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (qDASH) and Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) scores were also recorded. Trauma Outcome Measure scores at all time points were worse than expected (P < .01). Expectations were higher for patients younger than 65 years than for the 65+ group (P = .02). In patients aged 65+ years, mean TOM at 3 months was not significantly different than expected (P = .11) but decreased by 6 (P = .04) and 12 months (P < .01). Baseline TEF and TEF-TOM scores were not significantly different between operative and nonoperative groups (P = .37). Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand and PRWE scores were not significantly different between age or treatment groups at the final follow-up. The overall treatment of distal radial injuries in our study did not meet patient expectations. Patients aged 65 years or older had lower expectations but were not able to predict their outcomes better than patients aged <65 years. There were no differences in TEF or TOM by treatment method. Patients demonstrated improved functional outcomes (qDASH/PRWE) at all time points regardless of age and treatment method.