Patient Involvement In Decision Research Articles

#3012 Great impact of the results of PREMs and PROMs in all stages of chronic kidney disease. Analysis of 281 patients

Abstract Background and Aims In recent years, there has been a growing interest in the use and relevance of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measures (PROMs) and Patient-Reported Experience Measures (PREMs). The main objective of the study is to analyze scores in quality of life, anxiety, depression, and functional capacity using tests that assess PREMs and PROMs in patients at different stages of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Method Multicenter, cross-sectional, observational, non-interventional study with 281 patients (84 on hemodialysis, 48 on peritoneal dialysis, 50 with kidney transplant, 50 with advanced CKD, and 49 patients with CKD stages 1-2). Two professionals conducted interviews for data collection from all patients. Collected data: For PROMs: PFS (Piper Fatigue Scale), HADS (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), FACIT-F (Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue Scale), SF-36, VAS (Visual Analogue Scale). For PREMs - PACIC test (Patients' Assessment of Chronic Illness Care), in addition to other comorbidity indices and laboratory analyses. ANOVA statistical analysis was used for group comparison. Results Although patients showed significant differences in age and comorbidities, our analysis shows that the most PROMs do not discriminate between different stages of CKD. The PROMs that most discriminate between different stages of CKD are those related to the Piper Fatigue Scale test. PREMs, analyzed using the PACIC scale, do achieve said discrimination (Table 1). Conclusion The analysis of PROMs and PREMs show the significant impact that CKD has on health-related quality of life. Some PROMs can discriminate between different stages of CKD, but the most effective ones are PREMs, which are an indirect indicator of the quality of care received, contributing to patient involvement in decision-making and empowerment.

Social concordance and patient reported experiences in countries with different gender equality: a multinational survey

BackgroundPatient reported experiences (PREMs) are important indices of quality of care. Similarities in demography between patient and doctor, known as social concordance, can facilitate patient-doctor interaction and may be associated with more positive patient experiences. The aim of this research is to study associations between gender concordance, age concordance and PREMs (doctor-patient communication, involvement in decision making, comprehensiveness of care and satisfaction) and to investigate whether these associations are dependent on a countries’ Gender Equality Index (GEI).MethodsSecondary analysis on a multinational survey (62.478 patients, 7.438 GPs from 34 mostly European countries) containing information on general practices and the patient experiences regarding their consultation. Multi-level analysis is used to calculate associations of both gender and age concordance with four PREMs.ResultsThe female/female dyad was associated with better experienced doctor-patient communication and patient involvement in decision making but not with patient satisfaction and experienced comprehensiveness of care. The male/male dyad was not associated with more positive patient experiences. Age concordance was associated with more involvement in decision making, more experienced comprehensiveness, less satisfaction but not with communication. No association was found between a country’s level of GEI and the effect of gender concordance.ConclusionConsultations in which both patient and GP are female are associated with higher ratings of communication and involvement in decision making, irrespective of the GEI of the countries concerned. Age concordance was associated with all PREMs except communication. Although effect sizes are small, social concordance could create a suggestion of shared identity, diminish professional uncertainty and changes communication patterns, thereby enhancing health care outcomes.

Efficacy of Educational Intervention on Decision Conflict

Background: Decision conflict usually occurs from poor patient involvement in decision making which may cause regrets about the options that were chosen. Health professionals should impart antenatal education to enhance a mother’s belief about her birthing. Objective: To assess the effect of supportive educational intervention on decision conflict among primipara mothers with a fear of childbirth (FOC). Methods: An randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted on 205 primipara mothers with an FOC attending Gynae OPD. At 24–28 weeks of pregnancy, mothers were screened for FOC WDEQ-A and then randomly allocated to the experimental (103) and control group (102) and assessed for decision conflict by using a decisional conflict scale. The experimental group was given Supportive educational intervention. At 37–38 weeks of pregnancy, both groups were again assessed for decision conflict. Three participants from the experimental and two from the control group were lost to follow up and the final post-test was completed by 200 participants. Data analysis was done by calculating frequency, mean, standard deviation, Fisher Exact test, chi-square, t-test and F-test using SPSS version 18. Results: There was a significantly lower post-intervention decision conflict score in the experimental group as compared to the control group ( p < .001). No difference was observed in the pre-test score in both groups. Conclusion: Supportive educational intervention was effective in primipara mothers for reducing decision conflict. Improving antenatal emotional well-being will lead to a positive childbirth experience with better perinatal outcomes.

Are we gaining valid consent for dental extractions? A retrospective audit on restorability assessment at one dental institution.

Introduction This paper explores the widely relevant topic of obtaining valid consent in dental practice, focusing on assessing restorability of teeth planned for extraction. The General Dental Council stresses discussing treatment options, benefits and risks for informed decision-making. The study evaluates if pertinent factors, including tooth structure, endodontic status, periodontal health and patient considerations, are considered before consent.Aim To ensure restorability has been assessed and all options communicated with patients for completeness of the consent process before tooth extraction.Objective To assist clinicians in their systematic assessment of a tooth's restorability and provide a framework for contemporaneous documentation.Materials and methods A two-week retrospective audit of oral surgery outpatients at a dental hospital in London was conducted, analysing the frequency of restorability discussions and patient involvement in decision-making. A simplified restorability guide and educational interventions were introduced to target the set standard of 100% of consenting clinicians to discuss restorability with patients.Results Results from two audit cycles show a significant increase in documented restorability discussions and consideration of patient factors.Discussion The study recognised restorability assessment subjectivity, thus creating a simplified tool for clinicians. Patients may lack awareness of restorability options, consequences of edentulism, future costs and tooth replacement considerations, emphasising the importance of documented discussions.Conclusion Educational interventions and a simplified restorability guide proved beneficial and showed significant improvement in communication with patients regarding restorability and gaining valid consent. Further consideration should be given to barriers patients face when opting for tooth extraction of their restorable teeth, including discussions regarding long-term consequences.

Integrating Shared Decision-Making into Undergraduate Oncology Education: A Pedagogical Framework.

The integration of shared decision-making (SDM) into undergraduate oncology education represents a critical evolution in medical pedagogy, reflecting the growing complexity and patient-centric focus of contemporary healthcare. This paper introduces a comprehensive pedagogical framework designed to embed SDM within the undergraduate medical curriculum, particularly in oncology, where the multiplicity of treatment options and their profound impact on patient life underscore the necessity of this approach. Grounded in a systematic literature review and aligned with established educational theories, this framework proposes twelve strategic approaches to cultivate future physicians proficient in both clinical acumen and patient-collaborative decision-making. The framework emphasizes real-world clinical experience, role-playing, case studies, and decision aids to deepen students' understanding of SDM. It advocates for the development of communication skills, ethical deliberation, and cultural competence, recognizing the multifaceted nature of patient care. The inclusion of patient narratives and evidence-based decision-making further enriches the curriculum, offering a holistic view of patient care. Additionally, the integration of digital tools within the SDM process acknowledges the evolving technological landscape in healthcare. The paper also addresses challenges in implementing this framework, such as curricular constraints and the need for educator training. It underscores the importance of continual evaluation and adaptation of these strategies to the dynamic field of medical education and practice. Overall, this comprehensive approach aims not only to enhance the quality of oncological care but also to prepare medical students for the complexities of modern medicine, where patient involvement in decision-making is both a necessity and an expectation.

Patient Characteristics and the Extent to Which Clinicians Involve Patients in Decision Making: Secondary Analyses of Pooled Data.

The occurrence of shared decision making (SDM) in daily practice remains limited. Various patient characteristics have been suggested to potentially influence the extent to which clinicians involve patients in SDM. To assess associations between patient characteristics and the extent to which clinicians involve patients in SDM. We conducted a secondary analysis of data pooled from 10 studies comparing the care of adult patients with (intervention) or without (control) a within-encounter SDM conversation tool. We included studies with audio(-visual) recordings of clinical encounters in which decisions about starting or reconsidering treatment were discussed. In the original studies, the Observing Patient Involvement in Decision Making 12-items (OPTION12 item) scale was used to code the extent to which clinicians involved patients in SDM in clinical encounters. We conducted multivariable analyses with patient characteristics (age, gender, race, education, marital status, number of daily medications, general health status, health literacy) as independent variables and OPTION12 as a dependent variable. We included data from 1,614 patients. The between-arm difference in OPTION12 scores was 7.7 of 100 points (P < 0.001). We found no association between any patient characteristics and the OPTION12 score except for education level (p = 0.030), an association that was very small (2.8 points between the least and most educated), contributed mostly by, and only significant in, control arms (6.5 points). Subanalyses of a stroke prevention trial showed a positive association between age and OPTION12 score (P = 0.033). Most characteristics showed no association with the extent to which clinicians involved patients in SDM. Without an SDM conversation tool, clinicians devoted more efforts to involve patients with higher education, a difference not observed when the tool was used. Most sociodemographic patient characteristics show no association with the extent to which clinicians involve patients in shared decision making.Clinicians devoted less effort to involve patients with lower education, a difference that was not observed when a shared decision-making conversation tool was used.SDM conversation tools can be useful for clinicians to better involve patients and ensure patients get involved equally regardless of educational background.

Promoting patient-centered care in nursing education and the consequences of the Covid-19 pandemic. Results of a survey of nursing school principals in Germany

Background: Patient-centered care is largely determined by the manner in which patients and health care professionals such as nurses interact and communicate. To enable nurses to become familiar with the concept of patient-centered care and to learn concrete approaches to action, the training and qualification phase plays a central role. Although aspects of patient- and person-centered care can be found in the curricula of nursing training, it is unclear to what extent the associated competencies are being taught in nursing schools. Therefore, the aim of the study was to assess the educational goals and expected competencies acquired in nursing training regarding patient-centered care. In addition, it was investigated whether the acquisition of competencies changed during the Covid-19 pandemic.&#x0D; Methods: An online survey was conducted from March to April 2022 among members of the management team of German nursing schools. The questionnaires of N=347 respondents could be included in the analysis. Educational goals were assessed by a self-developed scale with nine items that could be rated on a 4-point Likert scale. The expected acquisition of competencies for patient-centered care were assessed on three subscales rated on a 5-point Likert scale. These focused on I) patient-centered decision making, II) patient-centered communication and interaction an III) patient-centered attitude. Information on sociodemographics, characteristics of the nursing school and digital health literacy was also obtained.&#x0D; Results: Members of the management team of nursing schools rated education goals regarding to patient centered care as important, with an general mean score of 3.6 (SD .34). Significant age or regional differences could not be found. However, there was a significant difference in gender: Female members of the school management team rated the educational goals as significantly more important overall than male members. The overall mean score in expected acquisition of competencies ranged in the subscales between 3.2 (SD 6.1) and 3.6 (SD .63). No significant sex, age or regional differences could be identified. Regarding the Covid-19 pandemic, about one third of the respondents stated that the acquisition of competences among nursing students has declined in the following aspects: involvement of patients in decision making, participation of patients in care situations as well as needs-based information, counselling, advice and education of patients.&#x0D; Conclusion: The results indicate that members of the management team of nursing schools highly value patient-centered care as an educational goal. However, they rated the nursing students' acquisition of competency on this issue as mid-level. The Covid-19 pandemic also contributed to a decline in patient-centred care competencies in a significant proportion. These findings should be further researched in future studies and there is as well the need for improving training and qualification programmes in nursing education regarding patient-centred care.

Personalizing electrolytes in the dialysis prescription: what, why and how?

Maintenance hemodialysis patients suffer from multiple comorbidities and treatment-related complications. A personalized approach to hemodialysis prescription could reduce some of these burdens by preventing complications such as excessive changes in blood pressure, arrhythmias, post-dialysis fatigue and decreased quality of life. A patient-centered approach to dialysate electrolyte concentrations represents one such opportunity. In addition to modifications in dialysate electrolyte concentrations, consideration of individual factors such as patients' serum concentrations, medication profiles, nutritional status and comorbidities is critical to tailoring hemodialysis prescriptions to optimize patient outcomes. The development of personalized dialysis treatment depends on the collection of comprehensive patient data, advances in technology, resource allocation and patient involvement in decision-making. This review discusses how the treatment of maintenance hemodialysis patients could benefit from individualized changes in certain dialysis fluid components.

The Role of the Surveyor in Discharge Planning for Patient Safety

This article reviews the critical process of patient discharge from hospitals and its challenges, with a focus on the length of stay (LOS) as an indicator of therapeutic success and treatment costs. Emphasis is placed on the importance of accurate diagnosis, appropriate discharge planning, and the prevention of readmissions to the hospital. Utilising the Calgary Family System Theory (CSFT) and the concept of Person-Centered Care (PCC), this piece underscores the significance of an individualised approach, patient involvement in decision-making, effective communication, and multidisciplinary collaboration in the discharge process. Thus, effective discharge planning can enhance the quality of patient care and reduce the economic burden associated with patient readmissions.

A Prospective Cohort Study of Medical Decision-Making Roles and Their Associations with Patient Characteristics and Patient-Reported Outcomes among Patients with Heart Failure.

Among patients with heart failure (HF), we examined 1) the evolution of patient involvement in decision making over 2 y, 2) the association of patient characteristics with decision-making roles, and 3) the association of decision-making roles with distress, spiritual well-being, and quality of physician communication. We administered the survey every 4 mo over 24 mo to patients with New York Heart Association class 3/4 symptoms recruited from inpatient clinics. The decision-making roles were categorized as no patient involvement, physician/family-led, joint (with family and/or physicians), patient-led, or patient-alone decision making. The associations between patient characteristics and decision-making roles were assessed using a mixed-effects ordered logistic regression, whereas those between patient outcomes and decision-making roles were investigated using mixed-effects linear regressions. Of the 557 patients invited, 251 participated in the study. The most common roles in decision making at baseline assessment were "no involvement" (27.53%) and "patient-alone decision making" (25.10%). The proportions of different decision-making roles did not change over 2 y (P = 0.37). Older age (odds ratio [OR] = 0.97; P = 0.003) and being married (OR = 0.63; P = 0.035) were associated with lower involvement in decision making. Chinese ethnicity (OR = 1.91; P = 0.003), higher education (OR = 1.87; P = 0.003), awareness of terminal condition (OR = 2.00; P < 0.001), and adequate self-care confidence (OR = 1.74; P < 0.001) were associated with greater involvement. Compared with no patient involvement, joint (β = -0.58; P = 0.026) and patient-led (β = -0.59; P = 0.014) decision making were associated with lower distress, while family/physician-led (β = 4.37; P = 0.001), joint (β = 3.86; P < 0.001), patient-led (β = 3.46; P < 0.001), and patient-alone (β = 3.99; P < 0.001) decision making were associated with better spiritual well-being. A substantial proportion of patients was not involved in decision making. Patients should be encouraged to participate in decision making since it is associated with lower distress and better spiritual well-being. The level of involvement in medical decision making did not change over time among patients with heart failure. A substantial proportion of patients were not involved in decision making throughout the 24-mo study period.Patients' involvement in decision making varied by age, ethnicity, education level, marital status, awareness of the terminal condition, and confidence in self-care.Compared with no patient involvement in decision making, joint and patient-led decision making were associated with lower distress, and any level of patient involvement in decision making was associated with better spiritual well-being.

Shared decision-making in physiotherapy: a cross-sectional study of patient involvement factors and issues in Japan

BackgroundEvidence-based medicine education has not focused on how clinicians involve patients in decision-making. Although shared decision-making (SDM) has been investigated to address this issue, there are insufficient data on SDM in physiotherapy. This study aimed to clarify the issues concerning patient involvement in Japan, and to examine whether SDM is related to perceptions of patient involvement in decision-making.MethodsThe study participants were recruited from among acute and sub-acute inpatients and community residents receiving physiotherapy outpatient care, day care, and/or home rehabilitation. The Control Preference Scale (CPS) was used to measure the patients' involvement in decision-making. The nine-item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) was used to measure SDM. In analysis I, we calculated the weighted kappa coefficient to examine the congruence in the CPS between the patients' actual and preferred roles. In analysis II, we conducted a logistic regression analysis using two models to examine the factors of patient involvement.ResultsAnalysis I included 277 patients. The patients' actual roles were as follows: most active (4.0%), active (10.8%), collaborative (24.6%), passive (35.0%), and most passive (25.6%). Their preferred roles were: most active (3.3%), active (18.4%), collaborative (39.4%), passive (24.5%), and most passive (14.4%). The congruence between actual and preferred roles by the kappa coefficient was 0.38. Analysis II included 218 patients. The factors for patient involvement were the clinical environment, the patient's preferred role, and the SDM-Q-9 score.ConclusionsThe patients in Japan indicated a low level of decision-making involvement in physiotherapy. The patients wanted more active involvement than that required in the actual decision-making methods. The physiotherapist's practice of SDM was revealed as one of the factors related to perceptions of patient involvement in decision-making. Our results demonstrated the importance of using SDM for patient involvement in physiotherapy.

Perspectives of Patients and Professionals on Patient Education in Complex Endovascular Aortic Repair

Misinterpretation of patient preferences in perioperative education can lead to an undesired treatment decision. This explorative interview study presents differences in perspectives of patients and professionals on patient education in complex endovascular aortic aneurysm management. Using convenience sampling, a cross-sectional interview study was performed among patients who were in various stages of the decision-making process for complex endovascular aortic repair. Five physicians were interviewed, representing the main providers of clinical information. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed inductively. Twelve patients (mean age 76.6 [standard deviation: 6.4], 83% male) were interviewed. Ten (83%) felt like they had no other realistic option besides undergoing surgery, whereas all professionals (5/5) stressed the importance of delicate patient selection. Five patients out of 10 (50%) who commented on their preferred decisional role considered the professional's advice as decisive. All but 1 patient (11/12) reported that the information was easy to understand, whereas 4 out of 5 professionals (80%) doubted whether patients could fully comprehend everything. Patients experienced a lack of information on the recovery process, although professionals stated that this was addressed during consultation. Several differences were found in the perspectives of patients and professionals on education in complex aortic aneurysm management. In order to optimize patient involvement in decision-making, professionals should be aware of these possible discrepancies and address them during consultation. Future research could focus on these differences in more detail by including more patients depending on their treatment and decision stages.

Evaluating the Impact of a Training Program in Shared Decision-Making for Neurologists Treating People with Migraine.

Migraine symptoms vary significantly between patients and within the same patient. Currently, an increasing number of therapeutic options are available for symptomatic and preventive treatment. Guidelines encourage physicians to use shared decision-making (SDM) in their practice, listening to patients' treatment preferences in order to select the most suitable and effective therapy. Although training for healthcare professionals could increase their awareness of SDM, results concerning its effectiveness are inconclusive. This study aimed to analyze the impact of a training activity to promote SDM in the context of migraine care. This was addressed by evaluating the impact on patients' decisional conflict (main objective), patient-physician relationship, neurologists' perceptions of the training and patient's perception of SDM. A multicenter observational study was conducted in four highly specialized headache units. The participating neurologists received SDM training targeting people with migraine in clinical practice to provide techniques and tools to optimize physician-patient interactions and encourage patient involvement in SDM. The study was set up in three consecutive phases: control phase, in which neurologists were blind to the training activity and performed the consultation with the control group under routine clinical practice; training phase, when the same neurologists participated in the SDM training; and SDM phase, in which these neurologists performed the consultation with the intervention group after the training. Patients in both groups with a change of treatment assessment during the visit completed the Decisional conflict scale (DCS) after the consultation to measure the patient's decisional conflict. Also, patients answered the patient-doctor relationship questionnaire (CREM-P) and the 9-item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9). The mean ± SD scores obtained from the study questionnaires were calculated for both groups and compared to determine whether there were significant differences (p < 0.05). A total of 180 migraine patients (86.7% female, mean age of 38.5 ± 12.3years) were included, of which 128 required a migraine treatment change assessment during the consultation (control group, n = 68; intervention group, n = 60). A low decisional conflict was found without significant differences between the intervention (25.6 ± 23.4) and control group (22.1 ± 17.9; p = 0.5597). No significant differences in the CREM-P and SDM-Q-9 scores were observed between groups. Physicians were satisfied with the training and showed greater agreement with the clarity, quality and selection of the contents. Moreover, physicians felt confident communicating with patients after the training, and they applied the techniques and SDM strategies learned. SDM is a model currently being actively used in clinical practice for headache consultation, with high patient involvement in the process. This SDM training, while useful from the physician's perspective, may be more effective at other levels of care where there is still room for optimization of patient involvement in decision-making.

Patient Involvement in Decisions regarding Emergency Department Discharge: A Multimethod Study.

Unmet care needs and more than one reasonable discharge solution have been identified among patients in the emergency department. Less than half of the patients attending emergency care have reported being involved in decisions to the degree they have wanted. Having a person-centered approach, such as involving patients in decisions regarding their discharge, has been reported as being associated with beneficial outcomes for the patient. The aim of the study was to explore the extent of patients' involvement in discharge planning in acute care and how patient involvement in decisions regarding discharge planning is managed in clinical practice. A multimethod study, including both quantitative and qualitative data, was carried out. The quantitative part included a descriptive and comparative analysis of additional data from the patient's medical records and patient's responses to the CollaboRATE questionnaire. The qualitative part included a content analysis of notes from field studies of interactions between healthcare professionals and patients. A total of 615 patients from an emergency department at a medium-sized hospital completed the questionnaire. Roughly, a third gave top-box scores (36%), indicating optimal involvement in decisions. Two factors, being discharged home and not readmitted, were significantly associated with the experience of being involved. In clinical practice, there was a focus on symptoms, and diagnostic tools and choice of treatment were decisive for the further care trajectory of the patients. Speed and low continuity left limited opportunities for dialogue to uncover patients' preferences. At the same time, the patients did not expect to be involved. Two out of three patients did not experience being involved in decisions regarding emergency department discharge. The interactions reflected an organizational structure in which the conditions for patient involvement were limited. Uncovering opportunities and initiatives to increase the number of patients who experience being involved in decisions is important tasks for the future.

Patient involvement in decisions about discharge from the emergency department: A qualitative interview study of the healthcare professionals’ experiences

BackgroundPatients in the emergency department are less involved in making decisions than they would like to be. Involving patients improves health-related outcomes, but success depends on the healthcare professional’s ability to act in a patient-involving manner, and therefore more knowledge is needed about the healthcare professional’s perspective of involving patients in the decisions. AimTo explore what challenges healthcare professionals experience in their daily practice regarding patient involvement in decisions when planning discharge from the emergency department. MethodFive focus group interviews were conducted with nurses and physicians. The data were analyzed using content analysis. FindingsThe healthcare professionals described how they experienced that there is no choice to offer the patients in the clinical practice. First, they had to manage the department’s routines, which directed them to focus on acute needs and avoid overcrowding. Second, it was too difficult to navigate the diversity of patients with different characteristics. Third, they wanted to guard the patient from a lack of genuine options. ConclusionThe healthcare professionals experienced patient involvement as incompatible with professionalism. If patient involvement is to be practiced, then new initiatives are needed to improve the conversation with the individual patient about decisions regarding their discharge.

A prospective cohort study of decision-making role preferences of patients with advanced cancer and their family caregivers.

This study aimed to examine (1) the evolution of patients-caregiver dyad decision-making role preferences over 3years and the predictors of these preferences; and (2) discordance in decision-making role preferences among dyads. A total of 311 patients with advanced solid cancer and their caregivers in Singapore reported their preferences for decision-making roles every 3months. The predictors for decision-making role preferences among dyads were identified via the actor-partner interdependence framework using a mixed-effect ordered logistic model. The proportion of patients and caregivers preferring patient-led decision-making was higher at the end of third year compared to baseline (patients: 40% vs. 20%, p value <.01; caregivers: 33% vs. 21%, p value=.03). Patients with female (odds ratio [OR], 1.74; p value <.01) and older (1-year OR, 1.02; p value <.01) caregivers and younger patients (1-year OR, 0.97; p value <.01) preferred higher involvement in decision-making. Caregivers with tertiary education (vs. lower education) (OR, 1.59; p value= .02) and those who accurately understood patients' treatment goals (OR, 1.37; p value= .01) preferred greater patient involvement in decision-making. Conversely, caregivers of female patients (OR, 0.68; p value= .03) and younger patients (1-year OR, 0.98; p value <.01) preferred lesser patient involvement in decision-making. The proportion of patient-caregiver dyads with discordance in preferred decision-making was lower at the end of the third year (51%) compared to baseline (68%) (p value <.01). Despite a reduction in the proportion of dyads with discordance toward the end-of-life, the percentage with discordance remained high throughout the illness trajectory. Interventions facilitating open communication between dyads should be pursued in efforts to decrease dyadic discordance.

Reflecting on challenges and opportunities for the practice of person-centred rehabilitation

Objectives To (1) reflect on challenges to the practice of person-centred rehabilitation; and (2) propose opportunities for the development of person-centred rehabilitation. Challenges Person-centred practice has received widespread endorsement across healthcare settings and is understood to be an important, positive approach in rehabilitation. However, the rhetoric of this approach does not always translate meaningfully into practice. Emphasis on patient choice, patient involvement in decision making, and increasing patient capacity for self-management have become a proxy for person-centred rehabilitation in lieu of a more fundamental shift in practice and healthcare structures. System (e.g. biomedical orientation), organisational (e.g. key performance indicators) and professional (e.g. identity as expert) factors compete with person-centred rehabilitation. Opportunities Four key recommendations for the development of person-centred rehabilitation are proposed including to: (1) develop a principles-based approach to person-centred rehabilitation; (2) move away from the dichotomy of person-centred (or not) rehabilitation; (3) build person-centred cultures of care in rehabilitation; and (4) learn from diverse perspectives of person-centred rehabilitation. Conclusion Fixed assumptions about what constitutes person-centred rehabilitation may limit our ability to respond to the needs of persons and families. Embedding person-centred ways of working is challenging due to the competing drivers and interests of healthcare systems and organisations. A principles-based approach, enabled by person-centred cultures of care, may achieve the aspirations of person-centred rehabilitation.

Treatment decision-making among patients with metastatic prostate cancer: Impact of decision locus of control on functional outcomes and decision satisfaction.

Shared decision-making (SDM) for metastatic prostate cancer (mPC) engages patients in the decision-making process and may be associated with better outcomes relative to physician- or patient-directed decision-making. We assessed the association between decision locus of control (DLOC) and patient-reported quality of life (QOL), functional outcomes, and decision satisfaction among mPC patients. After a clinic visit in which a treatment decision was made (baseline), mPC patients completed DLOC and QOL surveys. QOL was re-assessed at 2- and 4-months post-baseline. Mean scores for each QOL dimension (physical, emotional, cognitive, social, and role functioning) were compared by DLOC group using mixed effects models. Patient preferences for DLOC and provider communication techniques were similarly collected via survey. Median age of participants (N = 101) was 69 years (range: 49-92); most were White (80%) and married (82%). 62% reported using SDM. At baseline, there were no differences in QOL dimensions between DLOC groups. At 4 months, patient-directed (p = 0.01) and SDM (p = 0.03) were associated with better physical functioning than physician-directed decision-making, and there was an indication of potentially greater decision satisfaction among patients who reported patient-directed (p = 0.06) or SDM (p = 0.10). SDM was the most reported preferred DLOC. mPC patients reporting SDM had better physical functioning at 4 months than physician- or patient-directed decision-making, suggesting measurable benefit from patient involvement in decision-making. Future investigations of these associations in larger, more diverse populations can further clarify these previously unmeasured benefits of patient engagement in treatment decisions.

An AI-based patient-specific clinical decision support system for OA patients choosing surgery or not: study protocol for a single-centre, parallel-group, non-inferiority randomised controlled trial

BackgroundOsteoarthritis (OA) affects 20% of the adult Danish population, and the financial burden to society amounts to DKK 4.6 billion annually. Research suggests that up to 75% of surgical patients could have postponed an operation and managed with physical training. ERVIN.2 is an artificial intelligence (AI)-based clinical support system that addresses this problem by enhancing patient involvement in decisions concerning surgical knee and hip replacement. However, the clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of using such a system are scantily documented.ObjectiveThe primary objective is to investigate whether the usual care is non-inferior to ERVIN.2 supported care. The second objective is to determine if ERVIN.2 enhances clinical decision support and whether ERVIN.2 supported care is cost-effective.MethodsThis study used a single-centre, non-inferiority, randomised controlled in a two-arm parallel-group design. The study will be reported in compliance with CONSORT guidelines. The control group receives the usual care. As an add-on, the intervention group have access to baseline scores and predicted Oxford hip/knee scores and HRQoL for both the surgical and the non-surgical trajectory. A cost-utility analysis will be conducted alongside the trial using a hospital perspective, a 1-year time horizon and effects estimated using EQ-5D-3L. Results will be presented as cost per QALY gain.DiscussionThis study will bring knowledge about whether ERVIN.2 enhances clinical decision support, clinical effects, and cost-effectiveness of the AI system. The study design will not allow for the blinding of surgeons.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04332055. Registered on 2 April 2020.

"I know my body better than anyone else": a qualitative study of perspectives of people with lived experience on antimicrobial treatment decisions for injection drug use-associated infections.

People who inject drugs (PWID) are at risk for severe bacterial and fungal infections including skin and soft tissue infections, endocarditis, and osteomyelitis. PWID have high rates of self-directed discharge and are often not offered outpatient antimicrobial therapies, despite studies showing their efficacy and safety in PWID. This study fills a gap in knowledge of patient and community partner perspectives on treatment and discharge decision making for injection drug use (IDU)-associated infections. We conducted semi-structured interviews with patients (n = 10) hospitalized with IDU-associated infections and community partners (n = 6) in the Portland, Maine region. Community partners include peer support workers at syringe services programs (SSPs) and outreach specialists working with PWID. We transcribed and thematically analyzed interviews to explore perspectives on three domains: perspectives on long-term hospitalization, outpatient treatment options, and patient involvement in decision making. Participants noted that stigma and inadequate pain management created poor hospitalization experiences that contributed to self-directed discharge. On the other hand, patients reported hospitalization provided opportunities to connect to substance use disorder (SUD) treatment and protect them from outside substance use triggers. Many patients expressed interest in outpatient antimicrobial treatment options conditional upon perceived efficacy of the treatment, perceived ability to complete treatment, and available resources and social support. Finally, both patients and community partners emphasized the importance of autonomy and inclusion in medical decision making. Although some participants acknowledged their SUD, withdrawal symptoms, or undertreated pain might interfere with decision making, they felt these medical conditions were not justification for health care professionals withholding treatment options. They recommended open communication to build trust and reduce harms. Patients with IDU-associated infections desire autonomy, respect, and patient-centered care from healthcare workers, and may self-discharge when needs or preferences are not met. Involving patients in treatment decisions and offering outpatient antimicrobial options may result in better outcomes. However, patient involvement in decision making may be complicated by many contextual factors unique to each patient, suggesting a need for shared decision making to meet the needs of hospitalized patients with IDU-associated infections.