Patient Global Impression Of Improvement Ratings Research Articles

Comparison of outcomes between pessary use and surgery for symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse: A prospective self-controlled study.

PurposeWe compared the degree of pelvic floor symptom improvement between pessary use and prolapse surgery.Materials and MethodsPessary-naïve women who elected prolapse surgery were enrolled and used a pessary preoperatively (for ≥7 days and ≤30 days). Pelvic floor symptoms were assessed at baseline, after pessary use, and at 3 months postoperatively. The primary outcome was concordance in the degree of symptoms improvement between pessary use and surgery, as assessed by Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I). Secondary outcomes were related to prolapse specific symptoms on validated questionnaires (POPDI-6, PFIQ-7). The McNemar test was used for comparisons of discordant pairs for comparisons of the PGI-I ratings after pessary use and surgery.ResultsSixty-one participants were enrolled (March 2016 through April 2019) and 58 patients used a pessary. Mean±standard deviation age was 60.7±10.7 years; 24.1% had prior hysterectomy, and 13.8% had prior prolapse surgery. While both treatments demonstrated symptomatic improvement, concordance in the degree of overall improvement on the PGI-I score was poor (n=40); responses significantly favored more improvement postoperatively (p<0.001). Pessary use and surgery were associated with significant improvements in prolapse symptoms from baseline on POPDI-6 (both p<0.001) and POPIQ-7 (pessary, p=0.002; surgery, p<0.001). The degree of improvement was larger postoperatively compared to post-pessary use on POPDI-6 (p<0.001) and PFIQ-7 (p=0.004).ConclusionsBoth pessary use and surgery significantly improved pelvic floor symptoms from baseline. However, concordance in degrees of improvement between these treatments was poor, with more favorable outcomes after surgery for prolapse symptoms.

Impact of Galcanezumab on Total Pain Burden: A Post Hoc Analysis of a Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study in Patients with Episodic Cluster Headache.

PurposeIn a phase 3 study, galcanezumab significantly reduced the frequency of episodic cluster headache attacks across weeks 1–3 (primary endpoint) compared with placebo. However, multiple pain dimensions may contribute to the total burden of episodic cluster headache pain. This post hoc analysis assessed the impact of galcanezumab on the total pain burden of episodic cluster headache using a composite measure.Patients and MethodsPatients with episodic cluster headache were randomized 1:1 to galcanezumab 300 mg or placebo once monthly for 8 weeks. Mean weekly total pain burden was calculated (daily cluster headache attack frequency × average duration × average pain severity summed over 7 days) using data collected in an electronic patient-reported outcomes diary. Change from baseline in weekly total pain burden across weeks 1–3 was compared between galcanezumab and placebo. To explore construct validity, mean weekly total pain burden scores were stratified by Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) responses at the week 4 clinic visit.ResultsThe reduction from baseline in mean weekly total pain burden was significantly greater with galcanezumab (N=49) than with placebo (N=57): the least squares mean difference was −11.18 severity-weighted hours (p=0.035). Median weekly total pain burden decreased as PGI-I ratings improved, from 33.6 to 5.0 severity-weighted hours for patients who felt “very much worse” and “very much better,” respectively.ConclusionGalcanezumab significantly reduced mean weekly total pain burden compared with placebo in patients with episodic cluster headache. The composite pain measure demonstrated construct validity. Total pain burden may provide a holistic measure of the pain of episodic cluster headache.Clinical TrialsClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02397473.

Short- and long-term efficacy and safety of duloxetine in women with predominant stress urinary incontinence

Objective:To evaluate short- and long-term safety and efficacy of duloxetine in women with predominant stress urinary incontinence (SUI).Research design and methods:The study was a 6-week, double-blind, randomised, parallel, placebo-controlled study followed by an uncontrolled open-label extension (OLE) run in 342 study centres in 16 European countries. Women with predominant SUI were randomly assigned to placebo (n = 1380) or duloxetine 40 mg twice daily (n = 1378) for 6 weeks. Completers of the acute phase were enrolled in the OLE, which had a minimum duration of 6 weeks and ended, based on the approval status of duloxetine in the participating country.Clinical Trial Registry:www.clinicaltrials.gov; NCT00190996.Main outcome measures:The primary outcome measure was the change in incontinence episode frequency (IEF) over 6 weeks. Secondary outcome measures were the long-term maintenance of effect on IEF and Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I), the short- and long-term impact on quality of life using the King’s Health Questionnaire (KHQ), and the long-term safety of duloxetine.Results:After 6 weeks, the decrease in weekly IEF was significantly greater with duloxetine treatment compared to placebo (−50.0 vs. −29.9%; p < 0.001). The percentage of responders (defined as ≥50% decrease in IEF) was significantly higher with duloxetine treatment than with placebo (50.6 vs. 31.2%; p < 0.001). Duloxetine treatment was associated with improvements in weekly pad use (−31.4%), PGI-I ratings (63.6%), and KHQ score (−6.25) compared to placebo (−12.5%, 48.5% and −3.13, respectively, all p < 0.001). Treatment-emergent adverse events were significantly more common during duloxetine treatment (48.3%) than placebo (33.3%), (p < 0.001). Of the 2290 patients continuing into the OLE, 1165 (42.2%) completed the available duration, and 592 (21.5%) discontinued because of an adverse event (percentages relative to total randomised patients). Long-term efficacy in the OLE was assessed over a 72-week period and was maintained over that time. However, the results should be interpreted within the context that better responding patients are more likely to remain on duloxetine, while patients responding poorly are more likely to discontinue over time.Conclusions:Duloxetine seems to be an efficacious treatment with an acceptable safety profile for women with SUI. Achieved improvement is maintained over the longer term in those women who remain on therapy.

Patient-Assessed Versus Physician-Assessed Disease Severity and Outcome in Patients With Nonspecific Pain Associated With Major Depressive Disorder

This post hoc analysis compared how patients and physicians estimate disease severity and global improvement during 8 weeks of treatment for major depressive disorder (MDD) with associated nonspecific pain. In addition, predictors of pain and depression were identified. Data were derived from a double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, European study (conducted from May 2005 to May 2006) in adult outpatients with MDD (DSM-IV criteria) and moderate pain not attributable to a diagnosed organic pain syndrome (Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form [BPI-SF] average pain score ≥ 3). Patients were randomly assigned to duloxetine 60 mg/day or placebo and treated for 8 weeks. Physicians were asked to rate severity of depression by using the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and the Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Illness (CGI-S) and CGI-Improvement (CGI-I) scales. Patients were asked to assess pain using the BPI-SF, psychological symptomatology (9 domains including depression) with the Symptom Checklist-90-Revised (SCL-90-R), and overall improvement with the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I). Multivariate linear regressions were performed as post hoc analyses to identify predictors of disease assessment at baseline and at the end of the study using a last-observation-carried-forward approach. All SCL-90-R domains improved during the 8 weeks of treatment. At baseline, the MADRS was associated only with the SCL-90-R obsessive-compulsive score, while the SCL-90-R depression score was associated with the BPI-SF average pain score and with many SCL-90-R subscores. The global impression of improvement was rated higher by the physicians than by the patients. At the end of the study, CGI-I was significantly associated with a decrease in depression severity (MADRS; p < .0001), younger age (p = .0005), and a decrease of the SCL-90-R interpersonal sensitivity score (p = .0359), but not with BPI-SF average pain. In contrast, patient-rated PGI-I was significantly associated with the SCL-90-R depressive domain (p < .0001), BPI-SF average pain (p = .0003), and the SCL-90-R anxiety domain (p = .0041) scores. In patients with MDD associated with at least moderate nonspecific pain, physicians consider mainly the change in depressive symptoms as measured by MADRS in their CGI-I ratings, while patients also consider pain, depression, and anxiety in their PGI-I ratings. When treating depression and assessing treatment outcome, a broad spectrum of symptoms needs to be monitored. clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00191919.

Long‐term efficacy of duloxetine in women with stress urinary incontinence

To assess the maintenance of efficacy of duloxetine beyond 3 months, using data from several long-term, open-label studies, as the efficacy of duloxetine 40-mg twice daily for treating women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) for up to 3 months has been established in several randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials. Data from 1424 patients (Cohort A) enrolled in three 12-week, placebo-controlled clinical trials and their uncontrolled, open-label extensions, and in one uncontrolled, open-label study, were used to assess long-term continuation rates and continued efficacy based on responses to the validated Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) scale for up to 30 months. Data from another 2758 patients (Cohort B) enrolled in an additional placebo-controlled study and its open-label extension were used to assess PGI-I ratings, reductions in incontinence episode frequency (IEF) recorded on urinary diaries, and the relationship between PGI-I ratings and reductions in IEF for up to 72 weeks. In Cohort A, the duloxetine continuation rate at 1 year was 42.5%. At 12, 24 and 30 months, most (83%, 83% and 88%, respectively) patients in Cohort A who continued treatment rated their incontinence in one of the three 'better since starting treatment' PGI-I categories. Both the median IEF reductions (50-77%) and the PGI-I 'better' ratings (70-88% of patients) remained fairly consistent over 72 weeks in Cohort B. Finally, IEF reductions increased with increasing PGI-I ratings (approximately 46% for 'a little better', 75% for 'much better' and 95% for 'very much better') over the first year of treatment. The benefits of duloxetine were maintained in patients who continued treatment for up to 30 months. However, these favourable results need to be interpreted cautiously, as many patients discontinued treatment and those with better responses are more likely to continue taking medication.

Efficacy and safety of duloxetine in elderly women with stress urinary incontinence or stress-predominant mixed urinary incontinence

Objectives To evaluate the efficacy and safety of duloxetine in community-dwelling women ≥65 years with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) or stress-predominant mixed urinary incontinence (S-MUI) versus placebo. Methods Patients were randomly assigned for 12 weeks to placebo ( N = 134) or duloxetine ( N = 131) (20 mg twice daily [BID] for 2 weeks and 40 mg BID for an additional 10 weeks), followed by a double-blind 4-week dose de-escalation/discontinuation phase. The primary efficacy variable was the percent change in incontinence episode frequency (IEF) from baseline to endpoint. Other variables included absolute IEF change, responder rate, changes in mean time between voids (MTBV), weekly continence pad usage, the impact of treatment on quality of life, patient's global impression of improvement (PGI-I), and changes in depression and cognition. Results Duloxetine-treated patients had a significantly greater decrease from baseline to endpoint in mean IEF/week than placebo-treated patients (−52.47% vs. −36.70%, P < 0.001). The IEF responder rate (≥50% reduction in IEF/week) was 57.1% in the duloxetine group and 35.2% in the placebo group ( P < 0.001). Significant benefits of duloxetine were also demonstrated for weekly continence pad usage ( P = 0.011), MTBV ( P < 0.001), incontinence quality of life questionnaire (I-QOL) scores ( P < 0.001), and PGI-I ratings ( P < 0.001). Patients with depressive symptoms and cognitive impairments were few and changes were insignificant. The proportion of patients with ≥1 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was similar with both treatments, but dry mouth, fatigue, constipation, and hyperhidrosis were significantly more common in women taking duloxetine. Conclusions Duloxetine is a safe and effective treatment for elderly women with symptoms of SUI or S-MUI.

Duloxetine compared with placebo for the treatment of women with mixed urinary incontinence

Evaluate duloxetine in the treatment of women with mixed urinary incontinence (MUI). 588 women, 19-85 years old with >or=4 incontinence episodes/week were randomly assigned to duloxetine 80 mg/day (N = 300) or placebo (N = 288). Patients were classified into three symptom subgroups: stress or urge predominant MUI (SPMUI or UPMUI) or balanced MUI (BMUI) based on their responses to the validated Stress/Urge Incontinence Questionnaire. Half the population was randomly assigned to have urodynamics; SPMUI, UPMUI, and BMUI condition diagnoses were based on signs, symptoms, and urodynamic observations. The primary outcome measure was the change in incontinence episode frequency (IEF). Secondary outcome measures included the Incontinence Quality of Life (I-QOL) scores, the ICI Quality of Life (ICIQ-SF) score, and the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) rating. At baseline, women with SPMUI averaged 15.9 IEF/week (61% stress), those with UPMUI averaged 13.2 (70% urge), and those with BMUI averaged 16.5 (52% urge). Overall IEF decreases were significantly greater with duloxetine than placebo (median percent reduction 60% vs. 47%, P < 0.001); both UUI and SUI episodes were significantly decreased with duloxetine (median SUI IEF reduction 59% vs. 43%, P = 0.001; UUI IEF reduction 58% vs. 40%, P < 0.001). Duloxetine IEF decreases were significantly greater for patients with SPMUI conditions and symptoms and for those with UPMUI conditions but not symptoms. Significant benefits were also demonstrated with duloxetine for improvements in I-QOL total score (11.5 points vs. 8.1 points, P = 0.002), all three I-QOL subscale scores, and for the ICIQ-SF score (-2.6 vs. -1.7, P = 0.002) as well as for PGI-I ratings (much/very much better 44.2% vs. 27.3%, P = 0.001). Duloxetine demonstrated significant efficacy in this population of women with MUI.

Duloxetine versus placebo for the treatment of women with stress predominant urinary incontinence in Taiwan: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial

BackgroundThis manuscript compares the efficacy and safety of duloxetine with placebo in Taiwanese women with SUI.MethodsTaiwanese women with SUI were were randomly assigned to placebo (n = 61) or duloxetine 80 mg/day (n = 60) in this double-blind, 8-week, placebo-controlled study. Outcome variables included: incontinence episode frequency (IEF), Incontinence Quality of Life questionnaire (I-QOL) scores, and Patient Global Impression of Improvement rating (PGI-I).ResultsDecrease in IEF was significantly greater in duloxetine-treated than placebo-treated women (69.98% vs 42.56%, P < .001). No treatment differences in I-QOL scores were significant. There were significant differences in PGI-I rating. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were experienced by more duloxetine-treated than placebo-treated women (80.0% vs 44.3%; P < .001). Discontinuations due to adverse events were significantly greater for duloxetine-treated than placebo-treated women (26.7% vs 6.6%; P = .003).ConclusionData provide evidence for the safety and efficacy of duloxetine for the treatment for Taiwanese women with SUI.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00475358

Impact of duloxetine on quality of life for women with symptoms of urinary incontinence

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of duloxetine in improving quality of life among women with stress and mixed urinary incontinence. The study included 451 women with self-reported stress incontinence episodes (>or=1/week) who were randomized to duloxetine (40 mg BID) or placebo in a double-blind, usual care design. Patients and physicians were allowed to titrate, augment, and/or discontinue treatment. Concomitant treatments were permitted. The primary outcome was the Incontinence Quality of Life Questionnaire (I-QOL) score, with assessments at 3, 6, and 9 months. Other measures included the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) and adverse events. The adjusted mean change in I-QOL total score was greater in the duloxetine group than in the placebo group and at a level comparable to that found in previous clinical trials, but the difference between placebo and duloxetine was not statistically significant in the intent-to-treat, last observation carried forward (LOCF) analysis. The difference approached statistical significance in favor of duloxetine at 3 months (p=0.07). PGI-I ratings did not demonstrate significant superiority for duloxetine in LOCF analysis; however, study completers taking duloxetine were significantly more likely to rate themselves as "better" (70.2%) than completers taking placebo (50.8%, p<0.05). Women utilized a variety of treatment methods including pelvic floor muscle training, estrogen, anticholinergic medication, weight reduction, and smoking cessation. In this study, while mean I-QOL change scores were numerically higher for the duloxetine group than mean change scores for the placebo group, this difference was not statistically significant. Among women who completed the study on study drug, a significantly greater proportion of duloxetine women versus placebo women rated their condition to be better.