Patient-controlled Analgesia Pump Research Articles

Effects of pericapsular nerve group block on early postoperative cognitive function in older people undergoing hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block has emerged as a reliable analgesia technique for hip arthroplasty (HA). However, the effects of PENG block on perioperative neurocognitive disorder (PND) after HA has not yet been assessed. The present study aimed to investigate the effects of PENG block on early postoperative cognitive function in older people undergoing hip arthroplasty. Sixty older patients undergoing HA under spinal anesthesia were randomly assigned to group P (n = 30) receiving PENG block with ropivacaine and patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) pump with sufentanil after surgery or group C (n = 30) only receiving PCIA pump with sufentanil after surgery. The primary outcome was the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score at 7 days postoperatively. Secondary outcomes consisted of the incidence of PND 7 days postoperatively, the static VAS pain scores at 6, 12, 24, and 48h postoperatively; cumulative sufentanil consumption and the requirement of rescue analgesia during the 0-24h period after surgery; quality of recovery-15 (QoR-15) scale scores at 24h postoperatively; and the plasma levels of high mobility group box protein 1 (HMGB1) preoperatively and 1day after surgery, and adverse events. After surgery, the PENG block group had higher MMSE score than the control group at 7 days postoperatively (27.0 ± 1.8 vs. 26.1 ± 1.7, P = 0.048), with a mean difference of 0.9 (95%CI, 0.1-0.9). The incidence of PND at 7 days postoperatively was 6.7% in group P, lower than that of 30% in group C (P = 0.044). In group P, the static VAS scores at 6, 12, and 24h postoperatively were significantly lower than those in group C (all P < 0.05). Compared with group C, the cumulative sufentanil consumption and the number of patients required rescue analgesia during the 0-24h period after surgery were significantly lower in group P (all P < 0.05). The scores of QoR-15 scale were higher in group P at 24h postoperatively than those in group C (P < 0.05). Patients in group P showed lower plasma levels of HMGB1 than group C at 1day after surgery (P < 0.05), and the rate of complications didn't differ between both groups. Older people undergoing HA receiving a PENG block for perioperative analgesia experience improved early postoperative cognitive function, reduced postoperative pain, higher quality of recovery, and less postoperative inflammatory response. Chictr.org.cn identifier ChiCTR2200061055 (Date of registry: 15/06/2022, prospectively registered).

Labor epidural analgesia among Han and Uyghur parturients: a prospective observational study in China

BackgroundDisparities in pain sensitivity and tolerance have been described, however, little is known about variability in the experience of labor pain and childbirth in China. MethodsThis prospective observational study was conducted at a tertiary hospital in Xinjiang, China with two major ethnic groups: Han and Uyghur women. Women with a vaginal delivery with labor epidural analgesia were enrolled. The primary outcome was cervical dilation at labor epidural analgesia request, and multivariable linear regression analysis was performed to determine associated variables. Secondary outcomes were pain score at epidural request and epidural analgesics use. Data presented as mean ± standard deviation. ResultsCervical dilatation at labor epidural analgesia request was significantly lower (1.2 ± 0.7 vs. 0.8 ± 0.6 cm; p=0.0095), and pain score (numerical pain scale 0-10) was significantly higher (0.8 ± 1.0 vs. 4.2 ± 1.2; p=0.0002) among Uyghur compared to Han women. In the multivariate model, Uyghur women had a lower cervical dilation (p=0.0392) and a higher pain score (p<0.0001) at epidural request. During the labor process, a larger proportion of Uyghur women used the patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) pump (77.8% vs 53.6%, p=0.0011). They pressed the pump in a significantly shorter time (61.3±41.2 vs 104.0±105.2min, p=0.0015) and for more times (1.9±1.7 vs 1.2±1.4, p=0.0022), contributing to significantly more epidural analgesic use (sufentanil: 0.06±0.02 vs 0.07±0.03 μg/kg/h, p=0.0150, ropivacaine: 0.11±0.04 vs 0.14±0.06 mg/kg/h, p=0.0003, respectively). ConclusionsOur findings suggest that Uyghur women experience labor pain with higher levels of pain with a higher use of epidural analgesics than Han women. Further studies are needed to evaluate whether these differences are clinically relevant.FundingThis study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 72074162).Ethics and Trial registration: Ethical approval was obtained (www.chictr.org.cn Identifier: ChiCTR2200062630).

Effect of multimodal opioid-sparing anesthesia on intestinal function and prognosis of elderly patients with hypertension after colorectal cancer surgery

PurposeColorectal cancer (CRC) surgery in elderly patients with hypertension poses challenges due to potential complications and prolonged recovery. This study aimed to assess the impact of multimodal opioid-sparing anesthesia on intestinal function and prognosis of elderly hypertension patients undergoing CRC surgery.MethodsA total of 80 elderly hypertension patients who underwent open surgery for CRC in the People’s Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region from October 2020 to October 2022 were selected and randomly divided into two group (A and B, n = 40) through the random number table method. Group A received multimodal opioid-sparing anesthesia, defined as low-dose opioid general anesthesia combined with a transversus abdominis plane block, incision infiltration with local anesthetics, and postoperative analgesia via a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) pump, with the remifentanil dose set at one-third (± 10%) of the conventional group’s dose. Group B received conventional opioid anesthesia, involving standard general anesthesia maintained with remifentanil at 0.4–0.5 µg/(kg·min), incision infiltration with local anesthetics, and postoperative PCA. Primary outcomes included mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR), changes in albumin, C-reactive protein (CRP) and white blood cell (WBC), indicators of intestinal function recovery (the recovery time of bowel sounds, the first exhaust time, the first defecation time and the feeding recovery time), and visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores. Second outcomes included postoperative complications and total hospital stays.ResultsAfter excluding 8 patients, 72 were included in the final analysis. Compared with patients in the B group, patients in the A group exhibited shorter recovery time of bowel sounds, first exhaust time and feeding recovery time (P < 0.05), higher levels of postoperative albumin, and lower levels of CRP and WBC (P < 0.05). Moreover, the incidence of nausea and vomiting was lower and the total hospital stays were fewer in the A group than in the B group (P < 0.05).ConclusionMultimodal opioid-sparing anesthesia contributes to rapid recovery of postoperative intestinal function and reduction of postoperative adverse reactions. Therefore, it is safe and feasible to apply multimodal opioid-sparing anesthesia to elderly hypertension patients receiving open surgery for CRC.

Effect of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation on postoperative recovery quality in patients undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery: a randomized controlled trial

To observe the effects of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation (TEAS) on postoperative recovery and pain in patients undergoing elective endoscopic sinus surgery. One hundred and six patients scheduled for elective endoscopic sinus surgery were randomly divided into an observation group and a control group, with 53 patients in each group. Patients in both groups received TEAS or sham TEAS, respectively, from 30 min before intravenous anesthesia induction until the end of surgery. Acupoints selected were bilateral Neiguan (PC 6) and Zusanli (ST 36). The quality of requirements-15 (QoR-15) scores were assessed on the day before surgery (T0) and on postoperative days 1 (T1), 2 (T2) and 3 (T3). Pain visual analogue scale (VAS) scores were recorded at T1, T2 and T3. Athens insomnia scale (AIS) scores were measured at T0, T1, T2 and T3 in the two groups. The incidence of postoperative nausea-vomiting and dizziness-headache, usage of analgesics, number of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) pump presses, and extubating time were also recorded in the two groups. At T1, T2 and T3, the observation group had higher QoR-15 scores (P<0.01, P<0.001) and lower AIS scores (P<0.001) than the control group. At T1 and T2, the observation group had lower pain VAS scores than the control group (P<0.001). The incidence of postoperative nausea-vomiting and dizziness-headache was 24.5% (13/53) and 37.7% (20/53) in the observation group, which were lower than 56.6% (30/53) and 66.0% (35/53) in the control group (P<0.01). There were no statistically significant differences in the use of rescue analgesics or the number of PCA pump presses between the two groups (P>0.05). The extubating time was shorter in the observation group compared with that in the control group (P<0.001). TEAS could improve postoperative recovery quality, alleviate postoperative pain, improve sleep quality, and reduce the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing elective endoscopic sinus surgery.

A Randomised Clinical Trial to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Dexmedetomidine-Ropivacaine Versus Fentanyl-Ropivacaine for Epidural Labour Analgesia.

Background An epidural block is a superior potent approach to labour analgesia, and ropivacaine combined with fentanyl has been successfully practised for it. Dexmedetomidine, as a novel form of labour analgesia, must be researched further. Our study results give insight into the epidural block and come up with a pioneering approach for labour analgesia. Methodology A total of 68 parturients were assigned to two equal groups and received either dexmedetomidine with ropivacaine (Group RD) or fentanylwith ropivacaine (Group RF). Parturients received a loading dose and maintenance was given using a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) pump. Analgesia onset time, labour duration, rescue dose requirement, and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain scores were noted. Appearance, Pulse, Grimace, Activity and Respiration (APGAR) scores of newborns, Ramsay Sedation Scale (RSS) scores of mothers, and maternal side effects were observed. Results Group RDshowed a shorter onset time of analgesia (group RD: 12.50 ± 1.31 minutes vs. group RF: 15.26 ± 1.46 min), less local anaesthetics requirement (group RD: 47.54 ±5.37 ml vs. group RF: 59.05 ± 6.62 ml), less number of bolus doses (group RD: 0.15 ± 0.36 vs. group RF: 1.21 ± 0.95), and shorter duration from the epidural administration to the delivery (group RD: 312.97 ± 42.40 minutes vs. group RF: 345.94 ±14.67 minutes) than group RF. VAS values of the RD group were significantly less than the RF group. The RSS scores were comparably low in both groups, and excessive sedation was not seen in any group. Newborn APGAR values were comparably on the higher side in the two groups. Adverse effects were observed in the two groups, like hypotension, nausea/vomiting, bradycardia, shivering, and pruritus, which were insignificant. Conclusion The RD group showed an improved analgesic effect with a quicker onset of action,reduced requirement of local anaesthetics, and lower VAS scores compared to the RF group. With ropivacaine, dexmedetomidine shows more efficacy than fentanyl during epidural block and is a safe alternative for labour pain management.

Effects of Local Wound Infiltration Post-Mastectomy Using Bupivacaine Alone, Bupivacaine With Ketamine, and Bupivacaine With Dexmedetomidine: A Randomized Double-Blind Study.

Background and aim While the infiltration of surgical incisions with local anesthetics is not a new practice, it remains a crucial component of contemporary multimodal analgesia protocols. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of using adjuvants in combination with local anesthetic wound infiltration for pain management in patients undergoing mastectomy surgery. Methods Eighty-one patients aged 18-60 years, classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade I or II, were scheduled for unilateral mastectomy and randomly assigned to three groups of 27 each. The groups were designated as Group C (bupivacaine alone), Group D (bupivacaine with dexmedetomidine), and Group K (bupivacaine with ketamine). Group C received 0.25% bupivacaine alone, Group D received 0.25% bupivacaine with 1 mcg/kg dexmedetomidine, and Group K received 0.25% bupivacaine with 1 mg/kg ketamine. The time to achieve a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score of 3 following local wound infiltration was recorded for each group. Additionally, total postoperative fentanyl intake during the first 24 hours, as measured by the patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) pump, was compared among the groups. Sedation levels were assessed using the Ramsay Sedation Scale (RSS). Data were analyzed using the Chi-Square test and one-way ANOVA in IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 28.0 (Released 2021; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Results Demographic factors were similar across the three groups. Analysis of the VAS scores revealed that the ketamine group provided better postoperative pain control than the dexmedetomidine group (p < 0.001). Groups D (71.72 ± 71.73) and K (3.53 ± 13.42) had significantly lower 24-hour fentanyl intake (in mcg) compared to Group C (the control group), as measured by PCA. Additionally, Group C had a significantly lower RSS at the sixth hour (p = 0.003) compared to both Groups D and K. Conclusion Ketamine, when used as an adjuvant to bupivacaine for local infiltration, enhances the effectiveness and prolongs postoperative analgesia more effectively than dexmedetomidine in patients undergoing mastectomy.

Effects of popliteal plexus block after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized clinical trial

Background and objectivesMotor-sparing peripheral nerve blocks enhance multimodal opioid-sparing strategies after total knee arthroplasty. We hypothesized that adding a popliteal plexus block to a femoral triangle block could reduce 24-hour...

Limitations of Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia Following Abdominoplasty.

Effective postoperative pain management is essential for patient satisfaction and an uneventful postoperative course, particularly in body contouring procedures. Systemic analgesic regimens can be supported by regional procedures, such as the transverse abdominis plane (TAP) block, but these have a limited duration of action. In contrast, thoracic epidural analgesia offers the possibility of a longer-lasting, individualized regional anesthesia administered by a patient-controlled analgesia pump. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of a patient-controlled epidural analgesia to better classify the clinical value of this procedure in abdominoplasties. This work reviewed the digital medical charts of patients who underwent selective abdominoplasty without combined surgical procedures between September 2018 and August 2022. Evaluated data comprise the postoperative analgesia regimen, including on-demand medication, mobilization time, inpatient length of stay, and clinical outcome. The patients were grouped by the presence of a thoracic epidural catheter. This catheter was placed before anesthetic induction and a saturation dose was preoperatively applied. Postoperative PCEA patients received a basal rate and could independently administer boluses. Basal rate was individually adjusted during daily additional pain visits. The study cohort included 112 patients. Significant differences in the demand for supportive nonepidural opiate medication were shown between the patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) group (n = 57) and the non-PCEA group (n = 55), depending on the time after surgery. PCEA patients demanded less medication during the early postoperative days (POD 0: PCEA 0.13 (±0.99) mg vs non-PCEA 2.59 (±4.55) mg, P = 0.001; POD 1: PCEA 0.79 mg (±3.06) vs non-PCEA 2.73 (±3.98) mg, P = 0.005), but they required more during the later postoperative phase (POD 3: PCEA 2.76 (±5.60) mg vs non-PCEA 0.61 (±2.01) mg, P = 0.008; POD 4: PCEA 1.64 (±3.82) mg vs non-PCEA 0.07 (±2.01) mg, P = 0.003). In addition, PCEA patients achieved full mobilization later (PCEA 2.67 (±0.82) days vs non-PCEA 1.78 (±1.09) days, P = 0.001) and were discharged later (PCEA 4.84 (±1.23) days vs non-PCEA 4.31 (±1.37) days, P = 0.005). Because the postoperative benefits of PCEA are limited to potent analgesia immediately after abdominoplasty, less cumbersome, time-limited regional anesthesia procedures (such as TAP block) appear not only adequate but also more effective.

Bilateral ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block for postoperative pain relief in major traumatic spine surgery: A randomized controlled trial.

Spine fixation surgery for traumatic vertebral fractures is associated with severe pain and is often difficult to control. Traditionally systemic opioids have been the mainstay of analgesia for these procedures, which can lead to hyperalgesia, nausea, ileus, sedation, cognitive impairment, dependence, etc., limiting usage of opioids. The Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a novel ultrasound-guided procedure with easily identifiable sonoanatomy. We hypothesized that a multimodal approach involving ESPB to a conventional analgesic regimen with local infiltration for patients undergoing major traumatic spine surgeries might provide better perioperative analgesia and reduce the need for postoperative opioid requirements. A randomized control prospective trial was conducted on 34 ASA grade I -II patients aged 18 to 65 years who were scheduled to undergo elective posterior spine fixation surgery with ASIA B to E after traumatic spine fracture under general anesthesia. Patients were randomized to Group A which included patients who received general anesthesia with ESPB, and Group B, or the control group, included patients who received general anesthesia with systemic analgesics and postoperative local infiltration without ESPB. Intraoperative total fentanyl consumption, VAS score at 0, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 hours, time to activate patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) pump, total morphine consumption, and opioid-related side effects were monitored and compared in both groups. Postoperative PCA morphine consumption was significantly lower in group A patients who received ESPB than those in the control group (17.06 ± 9.59 vs 37.82 ± 9.88 P value = <0.0001). VAS scores at rest and movement at 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 hours were significantly lower (P value = 0.05) in the ESPB group compared with the control group at all time points. Bilateral ultrasound-guided Erector spinae plane block, when administered in traumatic spine patients undergoing spine fixation surgery, provides better analgesia with statistically decreased VAS scores and less postoperative opioid requirement.

Evaluation of the Effect of Smart Pump Interoperability on Infusion Errors in the Pediatric Hospital Setting.

Smart pump interoperability is a newer technology integrating intravenous medication -infusion instructions from the electronic medical record into a smart pump. This technology has demonstrated significantly decreased medication errors in the adult population; however, this has not been reported in pediatrics. The purpose of this study was to compare the frequency and severity of infusion related errors before and after the implementation of smart pump interoperability at a pediatric institution. This was a retrospective study conducted at multiple institutions within the same health care system to assess the effect of smart pump interoperability on infusion errors. Data were retrospectively analyzed for a 6-month period prior to (January-June 2020) and after (January-June 2022) smart pump interoperability implementation. All who received medications via a smart pump were included in the analysis. Infusions were excluded if administered via a patient-controlled analgesia pump, epidural pump, or intravenously pushed without using a smart pump. A total of 143,997 versus 165,343 infusions were administered in the before versus after interoperability group. There were significant decreases in mild, moderate, and severe harm averted events once interoperability was implemented (p < 0.001). Errors caught before administration decreased after interoperability implementation from 197 events to 20 events because of fewer overall errors (p < 0.001). The number of guardrail alert overrides was significantly reduced, from 23,751 to 5885 (p < 0.001), as was the number of high-risk overrides, from 5851 to 207 (p < 0.001). Implementing smart pump interoperability significantly reduced the frequency and severity of infusion errors and high-risk overrides at a pediatric institution.

Feasibility of hydromorphone PCA 10-day simple mode home management of patients in severe pain: A prospective multicenter study.

e24072 Background: Pain is a common symptom affecting patients with cancer. In clinical practice patients with advanced refractory cancer pain often face multiple anti-tumor treatments and prefer treatment at home or in community clinics versus hospitalization; thus, pain relief and drug management are challenging. Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) is an essential component of analgesic treatment. However, difficulties associated with PCA configuration, unified pump configuration mode, and tube blockage may limit its use by both doctors and patients, negatively affecting large-scale promotion of PCA technology in hospitals and at home. In this study we optimized PCA parameters to resolve problems around cumbersome operation and tube blockage, thereby increasing pump utility and feasibility. We refer to this mode as the "10-day simple mode." The study objective is to evaluate the analgesic effect of the "10-day simple mode" of hydromorphone PCA and to explore its home-based convenience and use. Methods: A total of 100 patients with refractory cancer pain were included in this study. The pump configuration mode was divided into two stages. The first (titration) stage was: hydromorphone + normal saline with a total volume of 24 ml and pump speed of 1.0 ml/h. The second (maintenance) stage was: hydromorphone + normal saline with a total volume of 288 ml and pump speed of 1.2 ml/h with PCA of 2.4 ml. During the maintenance stage, if pain control was unsatisfactory the background dose was increased based on the number of PCA presses in the previous 24 hours. Patients' numeric rating scale (NRS) scores, quality of life scores, and adverse reactions were recorded before and after treatment. Results: Patients' average NRS score before treatment was 7.4 (7-10). Average time to successful titration was 49.6 minutes (35.6-56.9) and 40.7% of patients achieved successful titration within 30 minutes. After titration, the average NRS score was 3.2 (0-6). There was a statistically significant difference in NRS scores before and after titration (p &lt; 0.05). During maintenance, 56.0% of patients experienced breakthrough pain on day 1, when the average NRS score was 5.2. As background dosing continued breakthrough pain and average NRS score gradually decreased (p &lt; 0.05). Quality of life scores and patient satisfaction measured before and after 10 days of PCA pump use showed significant improvement (p &lt; 0.001). Conclusions: For patients with refractory cancer pain, the hydromorphone PCA "10-day simple mode" produces good analgesic effect, is easy to manage, and suitable for patients seeking home-based pain relief. These results warrant further clinical study. Clinical trial information: NCT05744089 .

Continuous flow local anesthetic wound infusion for post-operative analgesia following kidney transplantation.

Some patients with end stage renal disease are or will become narcotic-dependent. Chronic narcotic use is associated with increased graft loss and mortality following kidney transplantation. We aimed to compare the efficacy of continuous flow local anesthetic wound infusion pumps (CFLAP) with patient controlled analgesia pumps (PCA) in reducing inpatient narcotic consumption in patients undergoing kidney transplantation. In this single-center, retrospective analysis of patients undergoing kidney transplantation, we collected demographic and operative data, peri-operative outcomes, complications, and inpatient oral morphine milligram equivalent (OME) consumption. Four hundred and ninety-eight patients underwent kidney transplantation from 2020 to 2022. 296 (59%) historical control patients received a PCA for postoperative pain control and the next 202 (41%) patients received a CFLAP. Median age [53.5vs. 56.0 years, p=.08] and BMI [29.5vs. 28.9kg/m2, p=.17] were similar. Total OME requirement was lower in the CFLAP group [2.5vs. 34 mg, p<.001]. Wound-related complications were higher in the CFLAP group [5.9%vs. 2.7%, p=.03]. Two (.9%) patients in the CFLAP group experienced cardiac arrhythmia due to local anesthetic toxicity and required lipid infusion. Compared to PCA, CFLAP provided a 93% reduction in OME consumption with a small increase in the wound-related complication rate. The utility of local anesthetic pumps may also be applicable to patients undergoing any unilateral abdominal or pelvic incision.

Impact of the addition of dexmedetomidine to patient-controlled intravenous analgesia on postoperative pain-sleep interaction cycle and delirium: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BackgroundThe reciprocal nexus between sleep and pain is well-documented, with the deleterious impact of operative trauma potentially playing a pivotal role in the dysregulation of this interplay, which could significantly contribute to the manifestation of postoperative delirium (POD). Studies have investigated the effect of adding dexmedetomidine (DEX) to patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) pumps on postoperative pain-sleep interaction cycle and POD, but conclusions remained uncertain. The objective of this investigation is to perform a meta-analysis that thoroughly assesses the impact of integrating DEX into PCIA, focusing on analgesic effectiveness, sleep quality, and the incidence of delirium in postoperative patients. MethodsPubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, SinoMed, and Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Platform were searched, for publications in any language, from database inception to September 2023. Our analysis encompassed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that examine the therapeutic efficacy and risk profile of adding DEX to the PCIA on the postoperative pain-sleep interaction cycle, by focusing on changes in postoperative analgesia (Visual analog scale (VAS) score), sleep efficiency, sleep structure, subjective sleep score (Assen insomnia scale and numerical rating scale) and adverse event rate. Results34 RCTs (4324 patients) were analyzed. This study shows DEX improved analgesia and reduced VAS scores at 6, 12, and 24 h after surgery. Sleep efficiency was enhanced on the 1st and 2nd postoperative night. DEX improved sleep structure at the 1st postoperative night by reducing non-rapid eye movement stage 1 (N1) sleep and increasing non-rapid eye movement stage 2 (N2) and non-rapid eye movement stage 3 (N3) sleep. At the 2nd night, DEX reduced N1 sleep and increased N2 sleep, but not N3 sleep. Data from AIS and NRS showed improvement in subjective sleep scores on the 1st postoperative night and 2nd night. Additionally, DEX decreased the occurrence of POD on the 24 h and first-three days. ConclusionThis study shows that the typical DEX doses added to PCIA with sufentanil were 2–5 μg/kg or approximately 200–250 μg, and the addition of DEX to PCIA can improve pain-sleep interaction cycle from multiple perspectives, and further decrease the occurrence of POD.

Effect of esketamine on postoperative analgesia and postoperative delirium in elderly patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery

ObjectiveTo investigate the analgesic effect of esketamine combined with low-dose sufentanil in elderly patients after gastrointestinal surgery, and whether the anti-inflammatory effect of esketamine is involved in the mechanism of postoperative delirium.MethodWe enrolled sixty elderly patients (age ≥ 65 years old, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade I-III) who underwent gastrointestinal surgery. Patients were randomly assigned to Group C (control group) who received sufentanil 2 ug/kg, and Group E (experimental group) who received sufentanil 1.5 ug/kg + esketamine 1 mg/kg, with 30 patients in each group. All patients underwent total intravenous anesthesia during the surgery and were connected to a patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) pump after surgery. The primary outcome was the evaluation of pain at 4, 24, 48 h after surgery which was evaluated by NRS scores. In secondary outcomes, inflammation was assessed by measuring IL-6 levels using ELISA. The postoperative delirium and the occurrence of adverse reactions were observed on the 1st and 3rd day after surgery.ResultsThe NRS scores at 4, 24, and 48 h after surgery in the experimental group [(4.53 ± 1.22), (3.46 ± 0.73), (1.37 ± 0.99)] were lower than that in the control group [(5.23 ± 1.16), (4.46 ± 0.77), (2.13 ± 0.78)] (P < 0.05). The concentration of serum IL-6 in the experimental group at 24 and 48 h after operation [(15.96 ± 4.65), (11.8 ± 3.24)] were lower than that in the control group [(23.07 ± 4.86), (15.41 ± 4.01)] (P < 0.05); the incidence of postoperative delirium in the experimental group was less than that in the control group (P < 0.05); there was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting between the two groups (P > 0.05), and neither group had nightmares or delirium.ConclusionEsketamine may enhance postoperative pain management compare with sufentanil, and esketamine has anti-inflammatory effects that reduce the incidence of postoperative delirium.Trial registrationFull name of the registry: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry. Trial registration number: ChiCTR2300072374. Date of registration:2023/06/12

A Randomized Control Study to Assess the Efficacy of Intrathecal Morphine in Patients on Patient-Controlled Analgesia Pump With Morphine for Postoperative Pain Relief After Elective Laparotomy.

Introduction Laparotomy is associated with significantprolonged postoperative pain, which can cause an adverse neuroendocrine stress response. Intrathecal morphine (ITM) retains an important place in pain management after major laparotomysince it is easier to administer and has a relatively lesser possibility of failure and technical difficulty. Aim The study aims to compare the effect of the administration of ITM with intravenous (IV) morphine administered by a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) pump on postoperative analgesia after elective laparotomy. The primary objective was to compare total morphine consumption while secondary objectives were to compare pain assessed by the visual analog scale (VAS) and adverse reactions to opioids. Methods Sixty patients who underwent elective laparotomy were enrolled in this study. Thirty patients were enrolled in the study group (ITM+PCA) where ITM (200 mcg) was administered before laparotomy and intravenous morphine was initiated with PCA postoperatively. In the control group, only intravenous morphine was given with PCA postoperatively for pain relief. Parameters in both groups were compared, where estimation of cumulative morphine dose was the primary outcomeand pain as assessed by VASand side effects of opioids were the secondary outcomes. Results Patients in the ITM (ITM+PCA) group required less morphine (6.6 ± 2.96 vs. 24.77 ± 6.79 mg of morphine, p < 0.001) compared to patients on PCA. There was no statistically significant difference in VAS score and adverse effects between both groups. Conclusion Preoperative ITM can be used as an effective and safe modality for alleviating immediate postoperative pain following laparotomy.

Different doses of nalmefene combined with hydromorphone hydrochloride for postoperative analgesia after colorectal surgery: a randomized controlled study

BackgroundHydromorphone hydrochloride has a satisfactory postoperative analgesic effect for patients with colorectal cancer but is accompanied by a relatively high incidence of adverse events. Low-doses of naloxone combined with opioids for patient-controlled analgesia can reduce the incidence of drug-related adverse events. Nalmefene is a more selective opioid receptor antagonist than naloxone. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of low-doses of nalmefene on the analgesic effect and incidence of adverse events of patients with hydromorphone patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) undergoing colorectal radical surgery.MethodsNinety-nine patients undergoing elective laparoscopic or hand-assisted laparoscopic radical surgery under general anaesthesia were randomly divided into three groups. Group N1 received hydromorphone hydrochloride 0.15 mg/kg + nalmefene 2 µg/kg; Group N2 received hydromorphone hydrochloride 0.15 mg/kg + nalmefene 0.5 µg/kg; and the control group (Group C) received hydromorphone hydrochloride 0.15 mg/kg. All medications were diluted to 100 ml with normal saline. The primary outcome was pain intensity at 12 h after surgery; the secondary outcomes were the occurrence of nausea, vomiting and pruritus and the total analgesic consumption of the PCA pump at 1 h, 6 h, 12 h, 24 and 48 h after surgery.ResultsThe NRS scores of Group N1 (2 µg/kg) were significantly lower than those of Group C (P = 0.025), and no difference was found between group N2 and group C (P > 0.05). Among the three groups, the NRS scores of Group N1 (2 µg/kg) were significantly lower than those of Group C at 12 h (P = 0.01) and 48 h (P = 0.01) postoperatively. Compared with 12 h postoperatively, the NRS scores were lower at 24 h postoperatively in Group N1 and Group C (P < 0.05) and significantly lower at 48 h postoperatively in all three groups (P < 0.001). There was a significant difference in the incidence of pruritus among the three groups (P = 0.036).ConclusionsNalmefene at a dosage of 2 µg/kg enhances the postoperative analgesic effect of hydromorphone hydrochloride and reduces the occurrence of postoperative pruritus.Trial RegistrationThe trial was registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (Registration number: ChiCTR2000033520, date: 03/06/2020).

Effects of contralateral versus ipsilateral electroacupuncture for analgesia and rehabilitation after unilateral total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a treatment for advanced knee osteoarthritis. Since postoperative pain affects rehabilitation, this study aimed to determine whether electroacupuncture (EA) contralateral to the surgical site is more effective than ipsilateral EA or sham EA in terms of relieving postoperative pain and promoting post-TKA rehabilitation. In this parallel, single-blind randomized controlled trial, 114 patients undergoing unilateral TKA were assigned to the contralateral EA (EA on the contralateral side + sham EA on the ipsilateral), ipsilateral EA (EA on the ipsilateral + sham EA on the contralateral side), or sham EA (sham EA on both sides) groups (n = 38 each). Treatment was performed once daily on postoperative days 1-3. The visual analog scale (VAS) scores, additional opioid doses via patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) pump, Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) knee scores, active/passive range of motion (AROM/PROM), swelling around the knee joint, and Hamilton anxiety scale (HAMA) scores were used for postoperative evaluation. At 3 days postoperatively, the VAS scores, HSS scores, AROM/PROM, swelling around the knee, and HAMA scores in the contralateral EA and ipsilateral EA groups were significantly improved compared with baseline. In addition, VAS scores, HSS scores, PROM and swelling around the knee were significantly better in the contralateral and ipsilateral EA groups than in the sham EA group, but similar in the two true EA groups. Furthermore, PCA additional dose release was significantly higher in the sham EA group than in the two true EA groups (which did not significantly differ). At 10 days postoperatively, the HSS scores, AROM/PROM, and HAMA scores were better in the contralateral and ipsilateral EA groups than in the sham EA group, but similar in the two true EA groups. Contralateral EA is more effective than sham EA for treating postoperative pain following TKA, but has an analgesic effect similar to that of ipsilateral EA. ChiCTR1800020297 (Chinese Clinical Trial Registry).

Pain Management Throughout Pediatric Laparoscopic Appendectomy: A Systematic Review.

Opioid-related fatalities are a leading cause of accidental death in the United States. Appendicitis is a common cause of abdominal pain in children and adolescents. The management of pain throughout the laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) in the pediatric population is a critical concern. This study aimed to evaluate trends in analgesic use and patient satisfaction following LA, with a focus on reducing the reliance on opioids for pain management. From 2003 to 2023, 18258 articles were filtered for all types of analgesic use with LA. The publications were screened using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, and 19 studies were included for analysis and review. The study included peer-reviewed experimental and observational studies involving individuals under 18 years. Pain management strategies varied across studies, involving a combination of analgesics, nerve blocks, and wound infiltrations. Analgesics such as acetaminophen, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and opioids were administered before and after surgery. Some studies implemented patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) pumps. Other studies explored non-pharmacological interventions like magnetic acupuncture. The results showed a reduction in the need for postoperative analgesics in patients treated with LA, particularly when using non-opioid medications and novel analgesic techniques. Pediatric patients who received gabapentin reported lower opioid use, shorter hospital stays, and high satisfaction rates. However, the reliance on opioids remained significant in some cases, particularly among patients with peritonitis who required more morphine. Pain management in pediatric patients is multifaceted, involving preoperative and postoperative analgesics, nerve blocks, and PCA pumps. Efforts to improve pain management following pediatric LA while reducing opioid reliance are essential in the context of the ongoing opioid epidemic. The findings from this study highlight the potential benefits of non-opioid analgesics, nerve blocks, and alternative methods for managing postoperative pain in <18 appendectomy patients. Further research and standardization of pain management protocols are needed to ensure optimal patient outcomes and minimize the risk of opioid-related complications.

Knowing the Dose to Control the Dose: Optimizing Patient-Controlled Analgesia in Adults with Sickle Cell Disease (SCD)

Introduction: Acute painful episodes are the most common cause of hospitalization in SCD. Intravenous (IV) opioids are the analgesic of choice to treat pain requiring hospitalization in adults. On-demand IV opioid dosing can be either via a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) pump or via intermittent nurse bolus. Advantages of PCA include better analgesia accessibility and relative independence from staff. However, significant variability exists in PCA management. A multicenter, randomized-controlled trial of PCA strategies in SCD was terminated early due to slow accrual, stemming from barriers such as suboptimal communication between inpatient teams. Additional limitations with PCA include technological limitations and incomplete charting through a manual process. We initiated a quality improvement project to understand patterns of PCA use in patients hospitalized for SCD pain crises at our institution. Methods: We performed a retrospective manual chart review on all adult patients diagnosed with SCD pain crises admitted to the University of Cincinnati Medical Center (UCMC) from October 1 through December 31, 2022. Inpatient data collected included reason for admission, length of stay, and documentation of inpatient opioid usage in daily clinical notes. Hospitalizations requiring intensive care admission for severe complications were excluded. Outpatient data collected included demographics and outpatient opioid prescriptions via the state prescription drug monitoring database. The study was approved by the UCMC IRB. Results: Fifteen patients were admitted to UCMC a total of 24 times for SCD pain crises during the 3-month period. The patients ranged in age from 21 years to 73 years (median age 33 years, interquartile range (IQR) 19.5 years) and the majority (11/15) were women. Disease-modifying therapies prescribed included hydroxyurea (8/15, 53%), chronic transfusions (2/15, 13%), chronic transfusions plus hydroxyurea (1/15), voxelotor (1/15), no disease-modifying therapy (2/15). Nine patients were prescribed daily outpatient opioids that included an oral long-acting opioid plus an oral short-acting opioid. Out of the 24 hospitalizations, 11 were for an uncomplicated pain crisis, 10 were complicated by mild acute chest syndrome (mild hypoxia and/or abnormal chest imaging), and 3 patients experienced other treatable complications (2 with Staphylococcus epidermidis bacteremia, 1 with deep venous thrombosis). Five patients were admitted two or more times. Two patients, admitted a total of 5 times, were maintained on nurse-administered IV bolus opioids during their admissions, in addition to oral opioids. The remainder of the patients were treated with a hydromorphone PCA pump with on-demand bolus dosing only, in addition to home long-acting oral opioids when applicable. Two patients were ultimately transitioned from PCA onto nurse-administered bolus IV opioids, due to failure to achieve adequate analgesia with PCA. In 9 out of the 19 admissions using a PCA, daily MME or the equivalent was charted in at least one progress note (47%). The median LOS in the subgroup in which PCA use was charted at least once was 7 (IQR 3.5) days. In the 10 admissions on a PCA in which daily MME was never charted (53%), the median LOS was 11 (IQR 6.25) days. Among patients not receiving outpatient opioids, daily MMEs from the PCA in the first few days of hospitalization (when recorded) ranged from 24 to 520 (median 178, IQR 241) MME. In patients who had daily chronic pain on outpatient opioid therapy, daily inpatient MME from PCA ranged from 360 to 1020 (median 545, IQR 418) MME. In patients with multiple admissions during the study period, the recorded daily opioid use was about two times that in the single admission group (median 673, IQR 500 MME in the multiple admissions group; vs median 329, IQR 351 MME in the single admission group). Conclusions: Our data suggest that length of stay is shortened by ~4 days when clinicians quantify daily opioid use for patients on PCA. In addition, patients with frequent admissions tend to have higher inpatient daily opioid use. This hints that readmission may be partly driven by mild withdrawal when on outpatient opioids at lower MME. A major barrier to data collection was inconsistent documentation of daily opioid use. The next step in our quality improvement project is an educational curriculum on inpatient opioid management for residents and hospitalists.

Inpatient Use of Extended-Release (ER) Opioids for Vaso-Occlusive Crisis Associated with Increased Length of Stay for ER Opioid-Naïve Patients

Background: The intermittent acute pain syndrome associated with sickle cell disease (SCD) is a poorly understood phenomenon with complex pathophysiology. Given the broad spectrum of analgesic interventions, including immediate-release (IR) and extended-release (ER) opioids, healthcare providers are challenged with the task of safely and effectively escalating inpatient opioid regimens, especially in the setting of limited guidelines outlining the combination of different opioid formulations. Despite SCD being the most common genetic disorder in the United States, more research is required to improve physician expertise with appropriate and timely pain management of vaso-occlusive crisis. Methods: This study was a retrospective chart review (n=200) of patients with known SCD requiring hospitalization for acute pain secondary to vaso-occlusive crisis without an alternative etiology of pain symptoms. The review included a patient population aged 18-67 years old with 43.5% males and 56.5% females hospitalized from 2/1/2022 to 5/6/2022. The primary outcome measure was hospital length of stay (LOS) for adequate pain control compared against varying factors of inpatient opioid-prescribing practices, including initiation or continuation (if prescribed within 6 months prior to admission encounter per PDMP review) of an ER opioid formulation, degree of morphine milligram equivalents (MME) escalation from outpatient regimen, utilization of a sickle cell analgesic order set, and initiation of patient-controlled analgesia pump (PCA). A secondary outcome measure investigated was the quantitative comparison of highest daily prescribed MME in relation to the aforementioned inpatient variables. Data analysis was completed using Wilcoxon Rank Summary analysis, with a significant p-value set to &amp;lt; 0.05. Results: Among the primary outcome analysis, the only significant factor affecting LOS was the introduction of an ER opioid. The results show that within the patient cohort naïve to an outpatient ER opioid (n=105), ER opioid-incorporated inpatient analgesic regimens resulted in a significantly increased mean LOS compared to IR opioid monotherapy regimens, with an average of 8.8 inpatient days as compared to 5.3 days, respectively (p-value &amp;lt; 0.001). For the patients prescribed an outpatient ER opioid at baseline (n=95), the continuation of an inpatient ER opioid did not result in a significant change in mean LOS, calculated as 6.7 days vs. 6.0 days in the continued and non-continued groups, respectively (p-value = 0.716). Among the secondary outcome measures, utilization of a sickle cell order set and PCA did not significantly affect degree of MME escalation. Conclusions: Limited evidence-based recommendations for the treatment of acute pain episodes in SCD has resulted in widely varying opioid regimens prescribed by inpatient providers and has created clinical challenges regarding the optimization of pain management. This study investigated inpatient opioid regimens utilized in treatment of vaso-occlusive crisis and found that the initiation of ER opioids resulted in increased length of stay for ER opioid-naïve patients as compared to treatment with IR opioids alone. These results question the benefit of inpatient ER opioids in relation to the risk of opioid dependence and MME escalation.