Patient-clinician Interaction Research Articles

Validity of wearable sensors for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) rehabilitation: A study in younger and older healthy participants

BackgroundWith 100,000 total knee arthroplasty (TKA) procedures taking place in the United Kingdom annually, the demand on rehabilitation services is high. Most regimes are home-based. Without clinician-patient interaction, detection of rehabilitation concerns can be delayed, reducing the chance of successful early intervention. Wearable technologies, such as MotionSenseTM (Stryker, US), may offer a solution to this problem by remotely supporting post-operative TKA rehabilitation through the provision of personalised rehabilitation and tracking of home exercises, enabling healthcare professionals to continuously monitor rehabilitation progress remotely. Validation of such devices against a known kinematic model in activities of daily living is important for confident interpretation of resulting clinical data. The aim of this study therefore was to validate the accuracy of MotionSenseTM against a clinical motion capture standard. MethodsTwenty younger and 14 older healthy, able-bodied adults attended one testing session (Younger: 24 ± 4 years old; Older: 71 ± 5 years old). Movement was tracked using Vicon motion analysis and a Plug-In-Gait lower body model was applied to all participants. Three activities were performed – walking, stair ascent, stair descent. The knee flexion angle root mean square error (RMSE) between the technologies was determined. ResultsFor both groups the knee flexion RMSE remained below 3° for all activities. The combined RMSE for all adults was 2.4° for walking, 2.7° for stair ascent, and 2.6° for stair descent. The signed error increased during the swing phase of gait. ConclusionMotionSenseTM was found to accurately estimate knee flexion angles during several common activities compared to Vicon motion capture.

How Do Paediatricians Manage Comfort with Uncertainty in Clinical Decision-Making.

While healthcare practice is inherently characterised by uncertainty, there is a paucity of formal curricular training to support comfort with uncertainty (CWU) in postgraduate training. Indeed, some evidence suggests medical training inherently conflicts with CWU in emphasizing pedagogies focussing on "fixing" the problem. While referral patterns increase significantly, dealing with uncertainty has direct implications for patient referral rates and use of valuable healthcare resources. Paediatricians in Ireland were invited to participate. Face-to-face interviews were conducted after participants watched videos of varied clinician-patient interactions.. Two researchers independently analysed the collected data using thematic analysis. Triangulation and member checking was performed to ensure validity of findings. A reflection journal documented the research journey. Thirty four paediatricians participated. Five themes were identified: the interplay between quality of information, uncertainty and decision-making, confidence in clinical assessment and first-hand patient evaluation, anxiety and fear experienced by medical professionals when dealing with complex and serious conditions, strategies employed by medical professionals in managing their own uncertainty and the impact of societal and parental expectations on medical decision-making. These are moderated by a number of factors, most significantly the child's caregivers' comfort with doctors reassurance (CDR). Enacted management will diverge from the consultant's clinical plan when the caregiver's CDR cannot be satisfactorily supported. Clinician CWU in the paediatric context is inextricably linked to caregiver CDR. The complexities and central importance of social context in understanding CWU has important implications for how we develop educational activities to support clinician CWU and patient/care-giver CDR. This may translate to efficient use of limited resources in healthcare settings.

Advancing Clinical Practice: The Potential of Multimodal Technology in Modern Medicine.

Multimodal technology is poised to revolutionize clinical practice by integrating artificial intelligence with traditional diagnostic modalities. This evolution traces its roots from Hippocrates' humoral theory to the use of sophisticated AI-driven platforms that synthesize data across multiple sensory channels. The interplay between historical medical practices and modern technology challenges conventional patient-clinician interactions and redefines diagnostic accuracy. Highlighting applications from neurology to radiology, the potential of multimodal technology emerges, suggesting a future where AI not only supports but enhances human sensory inputs in medical diagnostics. This shift invites the medical community to navigate the ethical, practical, and technological changes reshaping the landscape of clinical medicine.

Current and Future Implementation of Digitally Delivered Psychotherapies: An Exploratory Mixed-Methods Investigation of Client, Clinician, and Community Partner Perspectives.

Following the initial outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, mental health clinicians rapidly shifted service delivery from in-person to digital. This pivot was instrumental in maintaining continuity of care and meeting increased mental health service demands. Many mental health services have continued to be offered via digital delivery. The long-term implications of delivering services via digital media remain unclear and need to be addressed. This study aimed to identify current micro (i.e., clinician-patient interactions), meso (i.e., clinician-clinic manager interactions), and macro (i.e., government-policy maker interactions) level issues surrounding the use of digital mental health interventions (DMHI). Such integrated assessments are important for optimizing services to improve treatment outcomes and client satisfaction. Participants were recruited between January 2022 and April 2023. Quantitative data were collected using a survey informed by the Hexagon Tool. Qualitative data were collected from online semi-structured interviews and focus groups and analyzed using rapid thematic analysis. Survey data were collected from 11 client and 11 clinician participants. Twenty-six community partner participants were interviewed for this study. Client and clinician participants expressed satisfaction with the implementation of DMHI. Community partner participants generally agreed, reporting that such services will play an integral role in mental healthcare moving forward. Community partners shared that certain issues, such as uncertainty surrounding policies and regulations related to digital delivery, must be addressed in the future. Participants in this study supported the use of DMHI despite difficulties implementing these programs, asserting that such services are not a temporary fix but a pivotal cornerstone in the future of mental healthcare service delivery.

Focus on the blind spots of clinician-patient interactions: A critical narrative review of collusion in medical setting.

Collusions, interpersonal phenomena with an impact on patients, significant others, clinicians, and care, are mainly described in the psychotherapeutic literature but also occur in the medical setting. Comprehended as an unconscious bond between two or more persons from a psychotherapeutic perspective, definitions and collusive situations described in the medical setting vary. The question arises whether medical collusions, compared to collusions occurring in the psychiatric setting emerge in different clinical situations or are not identified as transference-countertransference experiences, since there is less sensitivity for the unconscious dimensions of care. We systematically reviewed the medical literature on collusions. Even though a read threat, avoidance of unpleasant feelings (mainly anxiety), runs through the described collusions, the unconscious dimensions and associated defensive maneuvers are rarely evoked. Given the expressed desire to act on collusions in medicine, involving third-party psychiatric liaison clinicians, who supervise clinicians, and hereby help to disentangle collusions, could be beneficial.

Patient-clinician interactions in shared diabetes/nephrology consultations - A qualitative observation study.

The incidence of chronic disease is increasing worldwide which, in turn, increases the demand for healthcare services. To meet these demands, healthcare systems are adapting their services in order to reduce treatment costs and ensure coherence for patients with multiple diseases. One form of adaptation is shared outpatient consultations between internal medical specialties. However, little is known about how patients interact with multiple clinicians in shared consultations. This project aimed to explore how patients with diabetes and chronic kidney disease interact with multiple clinicians in a shared outpatient setting. We performed a qualitative ethnographic study, combining focused participant observations with informal field interviews. We included 17 participants, nine males and eight females with a mean age of 67.3 in the project. The data analysis was guided by Braun and Clarke's reflexive thematic analysis and Arthur Kleinman's theory of illness and disease. We found one over-arching theme: 'A consultation which encompassed both illness and disease' and four subthemes: (1) 'The medical focal point' pertained to the focus on physiological measurements in dialogue between patients and clinicians. (2) 'The possibility of negotiations' illustrated how decisions about dialysis and pharmacological treatment were based on negotiations. (3) 'Speaking different languages' displayed how patients used alternative illness-based explanations whereas clinicians tended to use biomedical language. (4) 'Perceptions of everyday life' concerned what patients considered was best for them when managing their illness and everyday lives. Patients present information on how they balance life with physiological and psychosocial challenges. When clinicians employ a biomedical perspective, opportunities to gain information on patients' illness behaviours or cues to negotiate are missed. Patients prioritise functioning on a daily level over following treatment regimes. These findings are tenuous and require verification in similar studies in similar settings. Shared Outpatient Clinic, Patient-clinician interactions.

Augmented Reality-Based Chronic Wound Healing Assessment Using 3D Stereoscopic Imaging and Self-Organizing Maps

Background: Chronic wounds (CW) present significant public health challenges, impacting individuals' well-being and daily activities. Traditional wound measurement methods, such as the ruler technique, are time-consuming, imprecise, and pose infection risks. Advances in wound care technology, including artificial intelligence (AI) and augmented reality (AR), have improved wound healing (WH) assessment accuracy and enhanced clinician-patient communication. Methods: This study developed a novel CW evaluation device combining AR and a stereoscopic camera system. The device captures images using two Leopard Imaging LI-OV580 stereo cameras and a pico-projector to create a 3D wound model. The system calculates the wound area by processing stereoscopic images, utilizing structured-from-motion techniques and convolutional neural networks (CNNs). Additionally, the device measures epipolar and projection errors (PE) during AR-based wound evaluation. A Self-Organizing Map (SOM) was employed to refine the 3D reconstruction of the wound. Results: The AR-PE analysis demonstrated the device's accuracy, with the lowest PE recorded at 20 cm from the wound area. The projection error increased as the measurement distance moved toward the edges of the wound. The average epipolar error (EE) was 0.46 pixels, indicating high precision in stereoscopic measurements. Conclusion: The study introduced a non-invasive CW evaluation device that improves wound assessment accuracy and clinician-patient interaction. By utilizing 3D wound modeling and AR, the system enables more effective communication and progress tracking during WH. The results suggest this technology could enhance CW management, offering a reliable alternative to traditional methods.

Addressing diagnostic uncertainty and excellence in emergency care—from multicountry policy analysis to communication practice in Australian emergency departments: a multimethod study protocol

IntroductionCommunication failings may compromise the diagnostic process and pose a risk to quality of care and patient safety. With a focus on emergency care settings, this project aims to examine...

“Who’s watching?”: Exploring patients’ acceptance of having their consultations livestreamed for educational purposes

Shortages of clinical placements are an ever-increasing global challenge. Livestreaming clinical experiences to remotely-located learners shows promise in addressing this challenge. However, little is known about the acceptability of livestreamed clinical experiences for patients. Understanding patient views is critical to determine feasibility of this method of delivering clinical experience. This study reports on the experiences of 11 patients who participated in a livestreamed clinical experience in general practices in Yorkshire, United Kingdom. Up to five remotely-located medical students participated in each consultation. Semi-structured interviews were conducted and analysed using thematic analysis. Findings suggest that a livestreamed clinical experience did not impact patients’ experience of their consultation, including willingness to withdraw from the consultation. Smartglasses worn by clinicians did not impede patient-clinician interaction, likely because they did not obstruct eye contact. Patient views varied as to whether or not they preferred to see students on the computer screen during the consultation, raising potential tensions between student learning needs and patient preference. Most patients had no preference as to whether students participated remotely or in person. These findings show promise in terms of patient acceptability but further research evaluating patient perspectives in greater numbers and in other clinical contexts is important.

Thyroid nodules: diagnosis and management.

Thyroid nodules, with a prevalence of almost 25% in the general population, are a common occurrence. Their prevalence varies considerably depending on demographics such as age and sex as well as the presence of risk factors. This article provides a comprehensive overview of the prevalence, risk stratification and current management strategies for thyroid nodules, with a particular focus on changes in diagnostic and therapeutic protocols that have occurred over the past 10 years. Several sonography-based stratification systems (such as Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data Systems (TIRADS)) might help to predict the malignancy risk of nodules, potentially eliminating the need for biopsy in many instances. However, large or suspicious nodules necessitate cytological evaluation following fine-needle aspiration biopsy for accurate classification. In the case of cytology yielding indeterminate results, additional tools, such as molecular testing, can assist in guiding the management plan. Surgery is no longer the only treatment for symptomatic or malignant nodules: active surveillance or local ablative treatments might be beneficial for appropriately selected patients. To enhance clinician-patient interactions and discussions about diagnostic options, shared decision-making tools have been developed. A personalized, risk-based protocol promotes high-quality care while minimizing costs and unnecessary testing.

Exploring the role of therapeutic alliance and biobehavioural synchrony in musculoskeletal care: Insights from a qualitative study

BackgroundPerson-centred care underscores the therapeutic alliance (TA) as fundamental, fostering positive treatment outcomes through collaborative patient-clinician interactions. Biobehavioural synchrony within the TA, essential for effective care, reflects an adaptive process where organisms align responses during interactions. Enactivism and active inference provide profound insights into human perception, reshaping musculoskeletal care understanding. Touch and verbal communication, integral to the TA, foster synchrony and alignment of personal beliefs. AimThis study aimed to identify the tools used by manual therapists in musculoskeletal care to establish a TA with patients. Furthermore, it endeavours to evaluate the alignment of these strategies with current literature and their correlation with biobehavioural synchrony, enactivism, and the role of touch in active inference. MethodsThe methodology followed rigorous qualitative research principles, particularly Grounded Theory and interpretative-constructivist principles, conducting eleven semi-structured interviews with open-ended questions. ResultsThe core category identified in the study is elucidated as follows: "Interwoven Connection: The Fabric of Therapeutic Synchrony." The interviews unveiled three main categories, each comprising sub-categories: (1) Creating a meaningful dialogue; (2) Promoting active patient participation; (3) Synchronisation. ConclusionFostering meaningful dialogue, patient involvement, and therapeutic synchrony is crucial for a robust therapeutic alliance in musculoskeletal care. This underscores the importance of establishing a deep connection between clinicians and patients, central to effective person-centred care. Clinicians must prioritise two-way communication, empathy, and patient collaboration in defining personalised goals. Emphasizing touch and seeking patient feedback are also pivotal. Further research is needed to explore these elements and their impact.

Creating virtual patients using large language models: scalable, global, and low cost

Virtual patients (VPs) have long been used to teach and assess clinical reasoning. VPs can be programmed to simulate authentic patient-clinician interactions and to reflect a variety of contextual permutations. However, their use has historically been limited by the high cost and logistical challenges of large-scale implementation. We describe a novel globally-accessible approach to develop low-cost VPs at scale using artificial intelligence (AI) large language models (LLMs). We leveraged OpenAI Generative Pretrained Transformer (GPT) to create and implement two interactive VPs, and created permutations that differed in contextual features. We used systematic prompt engineering to refine a prompt instructing ChatGPT to emulate the patient for a given case scenario, and then provide feedback on clinician performance. We implemented the prompts using GPT-3.5-turbo and GPT-4.0, and created a simple text-only interface using the OpenAI API. GPT-4.0 was far superior. We also conducted limited testing using another LLM (Anthropic Claude), with promising results. We provide the final prompt, case scenarios, and Python code. LLM-VPs represent a ‘disruptive innovation’ – an innovation that is unmistakably inferior to existing products but substantially more accessible (due to low cost, global reach, or ease of implementation) and thereby able to reach a previously underserved market. LLM-VPs will lay the foundation for global democratization via low-cost-low-risk scalable development of educational and clinical simulations. These powerful tools could revolutionize the teaching, assessment, and research of management reasoning, shared decision-making, and AI evaluation (e.g. ‘software as a medical device’ evaluations).

Development of a Web-Based Interactive Tool for Visualizing Breast Cancer Clinical Trial Tolerability Data.

Longitudinal patient tolerability data collected as part of randomized controlled trials are often summarized in a way that loses information and does not capture the treatment experience. To address this, we developed an interactive web application to empower clinicians and researchers to explore and visualize patient tolerability data. We used adverse event (AE) data (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events) and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) from the NSABP-B35 phase III clinical trial, which compared anastrozole with tamoxifen for breast cancer-free survival, to demonstrate the tools. An interactive web application was developed using R and the Shiny web application framework that generates Sankey diagrams to visualize AEs and PROs using four tools: AE Explorer, PRO Explorer, Cohort Explorer, and Custom Explorer. To illustrate how users can use the interactive tool, examples for each of the four applications are presented using data from the NSABP-B35 phase III trial and the NSABP-B30 trial for the Custom Explorer. In the AE and PRO explorers, users can select AEs or PROs to visualize within specified time periods and compare across treatments. In the cohort explorer, users can select a subset of patients with a specific symptom, severity, and treatment received to visualize the trajectory over time within a specified time interval. With the custom explorer, users can upload and visualize structured longitudinal toxicity and tolerability data. We have created an interactive web application and tool for clinicians and researchers to explore and visualize clinical trial tolerability data. This adaptable tool can be extended for other clinical trial data visualization and incorporated into future patient-clinician interactions regarding treatment decisions.

"We Wanna Be Nurses Because We Want the Human Connection": Acceptability and Usability of a Person-Centered Narrative Intervention in an Acute Care Setting.

The use of narrative interventions in health care is an effective way to communicate connection between patients and clinicians. The electronic health record (EHR) is a primary mode of communicating patient information across clinical teams. Thus, incorporating a person-centered cocreated narrative with patients into the EHR is an opportunity to share a person's cultural values, beliefs, and preferences; provide connection; and foster positive patient-clinician interactions. This study of a person-centered narrative intervention was a randomized controlled trial to test intervention effects on the person's (patient) perceptions of the quality of communication with their nurses and their psychosocial and existential well-being. This article describes the clinical team's experiences and reach of the cocreated person-centered narrative integration into the patient's EHR. The data collected included (1) exit interviews (n = 14), (2) a usability survey (n = 8), and (3) data collected from the EHR for clinicians (n = 600) who accessed the uploaded narratives. Overall, the System Usability Scale and nurse participant's experiences provided confirmation that the person-centered narrative intervention was usable. There were also interprofessional groups of clinicians in the health care system who accessed the narratives. Future research should continue to identify core components and implementation strategies of EHR-integrated person-centered narratives in complex health care settings.

Cancer Patients' Perspectives and Requirements of Digital Health Technologies: A Scoping Literature Review.

Digital health technologies have the potential to alleviate the increasing cancer burden. Incorporating patients' perspectives on digital health tools has been identified as a critical determinant for their successful uptake in cancer care. The main objective of this scoping review was to provide an overview of the existing evidence on cancer patients' perspectives and requirements for patient-facing digital health technologies. Three databases (CINAHL, MEDLINE, Science Direct) were searched and 128 studies were identified as eligible for inclusion. Web-based software/platforms, mobile or smartphone devices/applications, and remote sensing/wearable technologies employed for the delivery of interventions and patient monitoring were the most frequently employed technologies in cancer care. The abilities of digital tools to enable care management, user-friendliness, and facilitate patient-clinician interactions were the technological requirements predominantly considered as important by cancer patients. The findings from this review provide evidence that could inform future research on technology-associated parameters influencing cancer patients' decisions regarding the uptake and adoption of patient-facing digital health technologies.

Association between language discordance and unplanned hospital readmissions or emergency department revisits: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background and objectiveStudies conflict about whether language discordance increases rates of hospital readmissions or emergency department (ED) revisits for adult and paediatric patients. The literature was systematically reviewed to investigate...

Unpacking complexity in addressing the contribution of trauma to women's ill health: a qualitative study of perspectives from general practice.

There is an intricate relationship between the mind and the body in experiences of health and wellbeing. This can result in complexity of both symptom presentation and experience. Although the contribution of life trauma to illness experience is well described, this is not always fully recognised or addressed in healthcare encounters. Negotiating effective and acceptable trauma-informed conversations can be difficult for clinicians and patients. To explore the experience of primary care practitioners caring for women through a trauma-informed care lens. Qualitative study in the general practice setting of England, with reflections from representatives of a group with lived experience of trauma. This was a secondary thematic analysis of 46 qualitative interviews conducted online/by telephone to explore primary care practitioners' experiences of supporting women's health needs in general practice, alongside consultation with representatives of a lived-experience group to contextualise the findings. Four themes were constructed: 'you prioritise physical symptoms because you don't want to miss something'; you do not want to alienate people by saying the wrong thing; the system needs to support trauma-informed care; and delivering trauma-informed care takes work that can have an impact on practitioners. Primary care practitioners are aware of the difficulties in discussing the interface between trauma and illness with patients, and request support and guidance in how to negotiate this supportively. Lack of support for practitioners moves the focus of trauma-informed care from a whole-systems approach towards individual clinician-patient interactions.

What are the perspectives of patients with hand and wrist conditions, chronic pain, and patients recovering from stroke on the use of patient and outcome information in everyday care? A Mixed-Methods study

PurposeTo evaluate the patients’ perspectives on the use of patient- and outcome information tools in everyday care and to investigate which characteristics affect general understanding and perceived value of patient- and outcome information.MethodsThis mixed-methods study included surveys and interviews on understanding, experience, decision-support, and perceived value in patients with hand and wrist conditions and chronic pain. We synthesized our quantitative and qualitative findings using a triangulation protocol and identified factors independently associated with general understanding and perceived value of patient- and outcome information using hierarchical logistic regression.ResultsWe included 3379 patients. The data triangulation indicated that patients understand the outcome information, they find it valuable, it supports decision-making, and it improves patient-clinician interaction. The following variables were independently associated with better general understanding: having more difficulty with questionnaires (standardized odds ratio 0.34 [95%-CI 031–0.38]), having a finger condition (0.72 [0.57–0.92]), longer follow-up (0.75 [0.61–0.91]), and undergoing surgical treatment (ref: non-surgical treatment, 1.33 [1.11–1.59]). For more general value, these were: having more difficulty with questionnaires (0.40 [0.36–0.44]), having a wrist condition (0.71 [0.54–0.92]), better hand function (1.12 [1.02–1.22]), and requiring help with questionnaires (1.65 [1.33–2.05]).ConclusionPatients value the use of patient- and outcome information tools in daily care and find it easy to understand. The factors associated with understanding and value can be targeted to personalized and value-based healthcare. We recommend using outcome information to improve patient independence, empowerment, and involvement in decision-making.

Intelligent Clinical Documentation: Harnessing Generative AI for Patient-Centric Clinical Note Generation

Comprehensive clinical documentation is crucial for effective healthcare delivery, yet it poses a significant burden on healthcare professionals, leading to burnout, increased medical errors, and compromised patient safety. This paper explores the potential of generative AI (Artificial Intelligence) to streamline the clinical documentation process, specifically focusing on generating SOAP (Subjective, Objective, Assessment, Plan) and BIRP (Behavior, Intervention, Response, Plan) notes. We present a case study demonstrating the application of natural language processing (NLP) and automatic speech recognition (ASR) technologies to transcribe patient-clinician interactions, coupled with advanced prompting techniques to generate draft clinical notes using large language models (LLMs). The study highlights the benefits of this approach, including time savings, improved documentation quality, and enhanced patient-centered care. Additionally, we discuss ethical considerations, such as maintaining patient confidentiality and addressing model biases, underscoring the need for responsible deployment of generative AI in healthcare settings. The findings suggest that generative AI has the potential to revolutionize clinical documentation practices, alleviating administrative burdens and enabling healthcare professionals to focus more on direct patient care.

The good pain patient: a critical evaluation of patients’ self-presentations in specialist pain clinics

ABSTRACT Established research supports collaborative patient-clinician communication as a means of improving pain management and decreasing opioid use by patients with chronic pain. However, much of this scholarship emphasises clinicians’ capacities to shape and improve communication; limited research investigates patients’ roles in this process. Drawing on 40 ethnographic observations of patient-clinician interactions, clinical spaces and case conferences within one specialist pain clinic in Brisbane, Australia, this paper investigates how and why patients present themselves in particular ways within consultations. Our theoretical lens combines concepts from Goffman on patienthood and stigma with Foucauldian theories of pastoral and disciplinary power. Findings suggest that elements of the clinical environment – namely posters – usher patients towards presenting in what we conceptualise as the ‘good pain patient’ role. In this role, patients demonstrate that they are moral, responsible, and contributing members of society. Yet, such a role is problematic to opening communication, with the role constraining what is socially acceptable for patients with chronic pain to say, do, or feel. In recognising how clinical contexts facilitate problematic good pain patient presentations, this paper directs attention to the spatial and relational nature of implicit clinical expectations and constrained good pain patient presentations.