Patient-Assessed Acromegaly Symptom Questionnaire Research Articles

Psychiatric disorders and anger in patients with controlled acromegaly.

Acromegaly (ACRO) is a chronic rare disease caused by a pathological increase in growth hormone (GH) secretion. In ACRO an increased prevalence of psychiatric disorders has been demonstrated, in particular depressive disorders, associated to a significant deterioration of the quality of life, independently from disease control. In addition, anger feelings, often detected in subjects affected by chronic disease, have not yet been investigated, in pituitary patients. Aim of the study was to evaluate in ACRO patients with a controlled disease, compared to patients suffering for non-functioning pituitary adenoma (NFPA) 1) prevalence of depressive and anxiety disorders, and 2) expression and control of anger feelings. The second purpose was to evaluate the correlation between psychiatric disorders, anger feelings and the "activity of disease," that is active ACRO that needs medical treatment versus cured ACRO. This is a cross-sectional, observational study, which included 53 patients enrolled at the Neuroendocrinology Outpatient Clinic of "Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino". Of the 53 enrolled patients (24 male and 29 female), 34 had ACRO, while 19 had NFPA, as control group. All subjects went through the following self-administered, validated psychological tools: SF-36 (Short-Form 36 Item); STAXI - 2; BDI-II (Beck Depression Inventory -II); STAI (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory). Only in ACRO group, patients completed PASQ (Patient-Assessed Acromegaly Symptom Questionnaire) and ACROQoL (Acromegaly Quality of Life Questionnaire) questionnaires. In addition 45 patients underwent the International Neuropsychiatric Short Interview to assess the presence of a psychiatric disorder. For each patient, anthropometric, clinical and biochemical information was collected. A higher frequency of psychiatric anxiety and mood disorders (not reported in the medical history) was observed in patients with controlled ACRO. In the SF-36 questionnaire, a lower score was found in the "emotional well-being" items in ACRO compared to NFPA, particularly in those with cured ACRO. Cured acromegalic patients had a worse score in "emotional well-being," "energy/fatigue" and "general health" items. Finally, subjects in ACRO group obtained a lower score in the ability to control anger and a higher score in the physical expression of it, demonstrating a tendency to more aggressive behaviors. This study showed that psychiatric illness is often hidden in patient suffering from ACRO, despite normal IGF-I levels. Recovery from the disease do not necessarily improve QoL scores, in fact in cured patients the quality of life can be even worse.

Association between pain, arthropathy and health-related quality of life in patients suffering from acromegaly. A cross-sectional study

Despite successful therapy, acromegalic patients have reduced health-related quality of life (HRQoL) compared to healthy controls. Finding predictors of poor HRQoL can be crucial to improving these patients' global health state. Aim: The primary objective of the study was to find out predictors of HRQoL. Secondary objectives were: (I) to determine correlations with AcroQoL subscales, and (II) to identify predictors for subscales. In this cross-sectional study conducted in 2019 at the Messina Policlinic Hospital, 45 acromegalic patients were assessed at the Physical and Rehabilitative Medicine Ambulatory. During routine outpatient clinic attendances, the following questionnaires were administered: Acromegaly Quality of Life Questionnaire (AcroQoL), Patient-Assessed Acromegaly Symptom Questionnaire (PASQ), and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC). We furthermore included the following variables obtained by medical record review: age, BMI, disease duration, previous surgery (Yes/No), previous radiotherapy (Yes/No), use of GH lowering medications (Yes/No), hypertension (Yes/No), diabetes mellitus (Yes/No), and biochemical control of the disease (Yes/No): immunoradiometric assays were employed to serum GH and IGF-1 measurements to identify biochemical control of the disease. Correlation between outcome measures and AcroQoL has been performed. Pearson's r was calculated for continuous data following normal distribution (AcroQoL, PASQ, AcroQoL-B, AcroQoL-R, WOMAC-P), while Spearman's rank order correlation was calculated for non-normally distributed data (WOMAC, WOMAC-F, WOMAC-S, AcroQoL-P) and point-biserial correlation for binary variables (biochemically controlled disease, use of GH lowering medications, radiotherapy, surgery). The same correlation analysis was performed for the AcroQoL subscales. Multiple linear regression with backwards, stepwise analysis was used to assess the influence on AcroQoL of correlated variables. AcroQoL was strongly negatively correlated with PASQ (r=-0.700, p<0.001) and negatively correlated with WOMAC [rs (43)=-0.530, p<0.001] and among WOMAC subscales with WOMAC-Physical fitness [rs (43)=-0.518, p<0.001] WOMAC-Pain [r (43)=-0.428, p=0.003], WOMAC-Stiffness [rs (43)=-0.393, p=0.007], and radiotherapy [r (43) =-0.314, p=0.035]. After univariate stepwise regression, PASQ was the strongest independent predictor of AcroQoL, with R2 of 0.392 [F (1,43)=27.695, p<0.001]. This study shows that the severity of painful symptoms is the most important predictor of HRQoL in patients with acromegaly; at the same time, acromegalic arthropathy leads to pain and to a variable amount of functional impairment, exerting great impact on the patient's perception of his health status. Measure of the progression of arthropathy and symptomatic management could lead to a great HRQoL benefit.

Self-reported symptoms in patients with acromegaly: a 6-month follow-up in a single neurosurgical center.

Acromegaly is characterized by hypersecretion of growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), accompanied by a compromise in the perception of wellness. The Patient-Assessed Acromegaly Symptom Questionnaire (PASQ) is relevant to assessing signs and symptoms but is mainly used to evaluate the efficacy of a pharmacological intervention. To explore the perioperative variation in symptom severity, the divergence between subgroups stratified according to clinical outcomes or treatment modalities, and the interaction between symptom scores and clinical indices, we prospectively recruited 106 patients with acromegaly from 2016 to 2018. Oral glucose tolerance and GH tests were performed, and PASQ was administered before treatment and 6 months postoperatively. Patients were divided into active (n = 49) and remission (n = 57) groups according to postoperative GH and IGF-1 levels. PASQ scores and GH and IGF-1 levels decreased significantly postoperatively in both groups. A significantly higher preoperative headache score and greater extent of decrease in arthralgia were seen in the active and remission groups, respectively. No significant variation in PASQ scores was found between patients receiving surgery alone and those receiving preoperative somatostatin analogs. Preoperative fasting GH (GH0) levels were positively correlated with preoperative excessive perspiration. Further regression analyses validated the variation in GH0 as a noteworthy determinant of the extent of change in soft-tissue swelling, excessive perspiration, fatigue, and total PASQ scores. Patient-reported symptoms were substantially alleviated after surgery, independent of endocrine remission or use of preoperative somatostatin. A GH level decrease was a notable coefficient for PASQ scores.

Patient-reported outcomes in patients with acromegaly treated with pegvisomant in the ACROSTUDY extension: A real-world experience

To report the effects of pegvisomant (PEGV) treatment on patient-reported outcomes in acromegaly patients. We conducted an extension study of an open-label, multinational, non-interventional study (ACROSTUDY) evaluating the long-term safety and efficacy of PEGV for acromegaly in routine clinical practice. Enrolled patients were rollover patients from ACROSTUDY, or treatment naïve/semi-naïve (NSN; no PEGV within 6 months of enrollment). Exploratory efficacy endpoints were changes in symptoms with the Patient-Assessed Acromegaly Symptom Questionnaire (PASQ) and quality of life with the Acromegaly Quality of Life questionnaire (AcroQoL) analyzed by controlled or uncontrolled IGF-I levels. Results were analyzed in all patients, in NSN patient subgroup, and by diabetes status. A total of 544 patients with acromegaly were enrolled, including 434 rollover subjects from ACROSTUDY and 110 NSN patients. Mean PEGV treatment duration was 7.8 years (range, 0-19.6 years). Overall, the majority of PASQ scores improved over time, but there was no significant difference between IGF-I controlled or uncontrolled groups. In the NSN subgroup, most PASQ and AcroQoL scores remained similar to baseline up to 1 year, regardless of IGF-I control. Patients with diabetes reported better PASQ scores over time with PEGV treatment, regardless of IGF-I control. IGF-I normalization increased from 10% of patients at baseline to more than 78% at year 10, with a mean daily PEGV dose of 18.7mg. Overall, patients treated with PEGV had small improvements in PASQ. While IGF-I normalization increased with PEGV treatment, IGF-I control had no effects on PASQ and AcroQoL scores.

Improvement in Symptoms and Health-Related Quality of Life in Acromegaly Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BackgroundWhereas biochemical response is often used as a primary study outcome, improvement in symptoms and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is the relevant goal for patients to consider treatment successful. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the effect of treatment on symptoms and HRQoL in acromegaly.MethodsSeven electronic databases were searched for longitudinal studies assessing patient-reported symptoms or HRQoL in acromegaly. Meta-analyses were performed to assess differences during treatment for the Acromegaly Quality of Life Questionnaire (AcroQoL) and Patient-Assessed Acromegaly Symptom Questionnaire (PASQ), and standardized mean difference (SMD) for individual symptoms (interpretation: 0.2 small, 0.5 moderate, and 0.8 large effect). Treatment-naive and previously treated patients were assessed separately.ResultsForty-six studies with 3301 patients were included; 24 contributed to quantitative analyses. Thirty-six studies used medication as main treatment, 1 transsphenoidal adenomectomy, and 9 various treatments. Symptoms and HRQoL both improved: AcroQoL increased 2.9 points (95% CI, 0.5 to 5.3 points), PASQ decreased –2.3 points (95% CI, –1.3 to –3.3 points), and individual symptom scores decreased for paresthesia –0.9 (95% CI, –0.6 to –1.2), hyperhidrosis –0.4 (95% CI, –0.1 to –0.6), fatigue –0.3 (95% CI, –0.1 to –0.6), arthralgia –0.3 (95% CI, –0.1 to –0.5), headache –0.3 (95% CI, 0.0 to –0.6), and soft-tissue swelling –0.2 (95% CI, 0.0 to –0.4).ConclusionSymptoms and HRQoL improved during acromegaly treatment. Consensus is needed on which symptoms should be included in a potential core outcome set, taking into account symptom frequency, severity, and sensitivity to change, which can be used in clinical practice and as outcome in trials.

Soluble Klotho: a possible predictor of quality of life in acromegaly patients

PurposeAlthough quality of life (QoL) is improved in patients with acromegaly after disease control, QoL correlates only weakly with traditional biomarkers. Our objective is to investigate a potential relation between the new serum biomarker soluble Klotho (sKlotho), GH and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) levels, and QoL.MethodsIn this prospective cohort study, we investigated 54 acromegaly patients biochemically well-controlled on combination treatment with first-generation somatostatin receptor ligands (SRLs) and pegvisomant (PEGV) at baseline and 9 months after switching to pasireotide LAR (PAS-LAR; either as monotherapy, n = 28; or in combination with PEGV, n = 26). QoL was measured by the Patient-Assessed Acromegaly Symptom Questionnaire (PASQ) and Acromegaly Quality of Life (AcroQoL) questionnaire.ResultsSwitching to PAS-LAR treatment significantly improved QoL without altering IGF-1 levels. QoL did not correlate with GH or IGF-1 levels, but sKlotho correlated with the observed improvements in QoL by the AcroQoL global (r = −0.35, p = 0.012) and physical subdimension (r = −0.34, p = 0.017), and with PASQ headache (r = 0.28, p = 0.048), osteoarthralgia (r = 0.46, p = 0.00080) and soft tissue swelling score (r = 0.29, p = 0.041). Parallel changes in serum sKlotho and IGF-1 (r = 0.31, p = 0.023) suggest sKlotho and IGF-1 to be similarly dependent on GH. Comparing the PAS-LAR combination therapy and the monotherapy group we did not observe a significant difference in improvement of QoL.ConclusionsPatients experienced improved QoL during PAS-LAR, either as monotherapy or in combination with PEGV. Soluble Klotho concentrations appear to be a useful marker of QoL in acromegaly patients but the underlying mechanisms remain to be investigated.

SUN-LB080 ACROSTUDY - Safety and Efficacy of a Cohort of 110 Naïve Patients with Acromegaly Treated with Pegvisomant

Background: ACROSTUDY is an open-label, non-interventional post-authorization safety study that began in 2004 to evaluate safety in at least 1000 acromegaly patients treated with the GH receptor antagonist pegvisomant (PEGV). This commitment was fulfilled in Jan 2013. ACROSTUDY was later amended to enroll an additional 110 patients that were naïve/semi-naive to PEGV treatment. Semi-naïve patients are defined as not having received PEGV therapy for at least 6 months prior to enrollment. Objectives: The primary objectives were to: 1) assess the long-term safety of PEGV in real world practice; 2) assess the effect of IGF-I normalization on treatment outcomes, including safety, glucose control and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Patients & Methods: 110 patients with Acromegaly 53.6% male, 81.8% Caucasian, median age 42.4 years at diagnosis; median age 48.9 years at PEGV start. Patients were considered ‘IGF-I Controlled’ if the most temporally-related IGF-I measurement was normal for that laboratory. Safety data including adverse events and liver tests were collected. IGF-I and HbA1C were measured; PROs were evaluated using the Acromegaly Quality of Life Questionnaire (AcroQoL) and PatientAssessed Acromegaly Symptom Questionnaire (PASQ), stratified by IGF-I control. Results: No new safety signals were identified in this sub-study. IGF-I SDS >2 decreased from 87% of patients at baseline to 31% at year 2 at a mean dose(±SD) of 10.4(±7.45) mg/day; patients with IGF-I SDS <2 had a mean dose of 14.8(±6.7). Among IGF-I controlled patients, median (range) HbA1C levels were 5.8% (5.4-6.1) at baseline and 5.6% (4.5-7.2) at year 2; in IGF-I uncontrolled patients, HbA1C was 6.1% (4.9-6.6) at baseline and 6.3% (2.9-10.6) at year 2. Among IGF-I controlled patients, median (range) global AcroQoL scores were 54.6 (24-73) at baseline and 61.4 (13-86) at year 2; while in IGF-I uncontrolled patients, median global AcroQoL score was 59.7 (8-92) at baseline and 63.6 (25-76) at year 2. Among IGF-I controlled patients, median (range) total PASQ score was 20 (3-38) at baseline and 17.5 (1-40) at year 2; in IGF-I uncontrolled patients, median total PASQ score was 17 (0-44) at baseline and 14 (3-39) at year 2. A greater number of the six individual symptoms of the PASQ score showed a positive trend for improvement from baseline to year 2 in the IGF-I controlled patients than in the uncontrolled patients. Summary: In this real-life world international study, overall biochemical control (i.e. normal IGF-I) was achieved with pegvisomant in 64.3% patients by year 2. Improved IGF-I control was associated with improved HbA1C, QoL and symptoms of acromegaly. One limitation of the study was that the PEGV dose may not have been adequately titrated to achieve IGF-I normalization. Unless otherwise noted, all abstracts presented at ENDO are embargoed until the date and time of presentation. For oral presentations, the abstracts are embargoed until the session begins. s presented at a news conference are embargoed until the date and time of the news conference. The Endocrine Society reserves the right to lift the embargo on specific abstracts that are selected for promotion prior to or during ENDO.

SUN-LB079 Acrostudy - Safety And Treatment Outcomes In 2221 Patients With Acromegaly Treated With Pegvisomant: Real World Experience

ACROSTUDY is an open-label, non-interventional post-authorization safety study (PASS) that began in 2004 to evaluate safety in at least 1000 acromegaly patients treated for 5 years with the GH receptor antagonist pegvisomant (PEGV). This commitment was fulfilled in 2013 but ACROSTUDY was extended as a voluntary PASS, ultimately collecting data on 2221 patients who were followed through Dec 2017. Objectives: To monitor the long-term safety of PEGV including the pituitary tumor volume, as prescribed in clinical practice. Patients & Methods: 50.8% were male, 92.4% Caucasian with median age 41.1 years (1.7-83.7) at diagnosis and median age 49.7 years (3.9-85.6) at start of PEGV. Mean duration of PEGV treatment was 9.3 years (0.0-20.8); 80.8% of patients started PEGV on a daily schedule and patients came from fifteen countries. Safety data included adverse events, change in tumor volume and liver tests. Efficacy was measured by IGF-I control (Patients were considered ‘IGF-I Controlled’ if the most temporally-related IGF-I measurement was normal for the local reference laboratory). Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were evaluated using the PatientAssessed Acromegaly Symptom Questionnaire (PASQ). Results: No new safety signals were identified in the study. IGF-I SDS >2 decreased progressively from 88.4% of patients at baseline to 34.8% at year 5 at a mean dose(±SD) of 19.2(±12.9) mg/day; 63.3% of patients with a documented normal IGF-I SDS had a mean dose of 16.2(±9.03), while 1.9% had IGF-I SDS < -2 at a mean dose of 16.5(±5.81). 1795 Patients had at least 1 local pituitary imaging result reported: 71.1% of patients reported no change, 17.3% reported a decrease and 7.1% reported an increase in tumor size while 4.5% reported both an increase and a decrease. Scans reported as showing a meaningful change in tumor volume (n=264) were re-evaluated centrally by an independent expert: 54 were corroborated enlarged, 84 were decreased, 12 were read as both increased and decreased, 23 were read as no change and 40 inconclusive; thus the overall incidence of (corroborated) tumor increases was 3.0% and decreases 4.7%. In the overall cohort, AST and/or ALT were >3 × ULN at any time during PEGV treatment in 3.2% of patients. PASQ score was 15 (0-46) at baseline and 10 (0-41) at year 8. Summary: In this real world international study, overall biochemical control (i.e. normal IGF-I) progressively improved with pegvisomant, and was achieved in 63.3% patients by year 5. Improved IGF-I control was associated with improved symptoms of acromegaly. Importantly, in this large cohort of patients the incidence of pituitary tumor increase and liver test elevations were low, and similar to previously reported rates. One limitation of this observational study was that the PEGV dose may not have been adequately titrated to achieve IGF-I normalization. Unless otherwise noted, all abstracts presented at ENDO are embargoed until the date and time of presentation. For oral presentations, the abstracts are embargoed until the session begins. s presented at a news conference are embargoed until the date and time of the news conference. The Endocrine Society reserves the right to lift the embargo on specific abstracts that are selected for promotion prior to or during ENDO.

Prediction of therapy response in acromegalic patients under pegvisomant therapy within the German ACROSTUDY cohort.

This study aimed at investigating predicting factors for therapy response under growth hormone receptor antagonist therapy with a focus on subjective and patient-oriented measures. Observational, multicenter nested-cohort study including 271 selected patients with the diagnosis of acromegaly and a minimum of one-year follow-up period within the German ACROSTUDY cohort (total cohort: n=514). Outcome measures were the change of the biomarker IGF-1 (IGF-1 change and IGF-1 normalisation) between baseline and after 1year of pegvisomant therapy (12±6months). Main predictors were patient-assessed subjective measures according to the Patient-Assessed Acromegaly Symptom Questionnaire (PASQ) in conjugation with age, gender, BMI, max. dosage of pegvisomant at follow-up and IGF-1 before the start of pegvisomant therapy. The mean age of the study population was 51.2 (13.9) years and the mean BMI was 29.5 (5.1)kg/m(2). In adjusted analyses, none of the individual perceived health (PASQ) scores, but age, BMI and IGF-1 at baseline were predictive for an IGF-1 decrease after 1year of pegvisomant therapy and BMI and IGF-1, but equally none of the PASQ items, were predicting IGF-1 normalisation. Age, BMI and baseline IGF-1 but not subjective perceived health measures predict therapy response under second line medical therapy with pegvisomant.

Conventional and novel biomarkers of treatment outcome in patients with acromegaly: discordant results after somatostatin analog treatment compared with surgery

Control of disease activity in acromegaly is critical, but the biochemical definitions remain controversial. To compare traditional and novel biomarkers and health status in patients with acromegaly treated with either surgery alone or somatostatin analog (SA). Sixty-three patients in long-term remission based on normalized total IGF1 levels after surgery alone (n=36) or SA (n=27) were studied in a cross-sectional manner. The groups were comparable at diagnosis regarding demographic and biochemical variables. Each subject underwent 3 h of serum sampling including a 2-h oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Health status was measured by two questionnaires: EuroQoL and Acrostudy (Patient-assessed-Acromegaly symptom questionnaire (PASQ)). Total and bioactive IGF1 (μg/l) levels were similar (total: 185 ± 10 (SA) versus 171 ± 8 (surgery) (P=0.28); bioactive: 1.9 ± 0.2 vs 1.9 ± 0.1 (P=0.70)). Suppression of total and free GH (μg/l) during OGTT was blunted in the SA group (total GH(nadir): 0.59 ± 0.08 (SA) versus 0.34 ± 0.06 (surgery) (P=0.01); free GH(nadir): 0.43 ± 0.06 vs 0.19 ± 0.04 (P<0.01)). The insulin response to OGTT was delayed, and the 2-h glucose level was elevated during SA treatment (P=0.02). Disease-specific health status was better in patients after surgery (P=0.02). i) Despite similar and normalized IGF1 levels, SA treatment compared with surgery alone was associated with less suppressed GH levels and less symptom relief; ii) this discordance may be due to specific suppression of hepatic IGF1 production by SA; iii) we suggest that biochemical assessment during SA treatment should include both GH and IGF1.

Change of symptoms and perceived health in acromegalic patients on pegvisomant therapy: a retrospective cohort study within the German Pegvisomant Observational Study (GPOS)

This study aimed at investigating how symptoms and perceived health changes in acromegalic patients during pegvisomant treatment in respect to IGF-1 levels and disease characteristics. Retrospective, multicentre cohort study in 131 acromegalic patients within the German Pegvisomant Observational Study (GPOS). Outcome measure was the change of perceived health evaluated by the Patient-Assessed Acromegaly Symptom Questionnaire (PASQ) between baseline and after 1 year of pegvisomant therapy. Predictors were change in IGF-1 levels, maximal pegvisomant dosage, adverse events and comorbidities. Perspiration, soft tissue swelling and perceived health improved after 1 year of pegvisomant therapy while other symptoms such as headache, fatigue and joint pain remained largely unchanged over time. The highest mean IGF-1/upper limit of normal (ULN) values before pegvisomant therapy were found in those patients with a reported amelioration in perspiration and soft tissue swelling after 1 year of pegvisomant treatment. The highest mean decrease of IGF-1/ULN was found in those patients with reported amelioration of numbness and tingling of limbs. Other factors such as decrease in fasting glucose may play a role as independent predictor for some symptoms such as the improvement of headache, perspiration and perceived health, while other factors such as maximal pegvisomant dosage, occurrence of adverse events, tumour growth, or liver enzyme elevation did not play a predictive role. Patients' symptoms and perceived health are in part an independent construct, not merely reflecting IGF-1 status or biochemical control. Subjective measures should therefore be regularly documented in acromegalic patients as a patient-oriented indicator for treatment success.

The German ACROSTUDY: past and present

Pivotal studies have demonstrated that pharmacotherapy with pegvisomant (Somavert) is a highly effective treatment for acromegaly. Since clinical experience with the drug was very limited, the Pegvisomant Observational Study was launched in Germany immediately with the drug becoming commercially available to patients early in 2004. Its purpose was to record safety and efficacy data on as many patients as possible. As of 12th August 2008 a total of 371 patients (185 males, 186 females) had been included in the study. They were on pegvisomant therapy for an average of 118 weeks. Median and mean doses of pegvisomant were 15 and 16.4 mg/day respectively. Treatment efficacy was monitored by IGF1 levels and the patients symptoms were evaluated by completion of a questionnaire (patient-assessed acromegaly symptom questionnaire). Safety data included liver function tests, fasting glucose, HbA1c measurements, and tumor size monitoring by repeated magnetic resonance imaging. Normalization of IGF1 ranged from 55.7% of the 273 patients assessed after 6 months to 71.3% of 202 patients assessed after 24 months of treatment. It was 70.7% after 36 months (133 patients), 64.8% at 48 months (71 patients), and 58.4% after 60 months (24 patients). In 39 patients (10.9%) treatment was discontinued due to serious adverse events or adverse events with 25 (6.7%) of these patients having a potential causal relationship with the pegvisomant treatment. Liver function tests became abnormal in 20 patients and another three patients were recorded to have hepatobiliary disorders. Tumor size increase was reported in 20 patients, but only confirmed in nine patients by careful revision of all available images. Local injection site reactions were observed in 12 patients. In conclusion, in this large group of pegvisomant-treated patients, long-term data for up to 5 years of treatment are now available. In 71.3% of patients with previously not sufficiently treatable acromegaly, IGF1 levels were normalized by pegvisomant therapy. Elevated transaminases usually normalized after discontinuation but in half of the affected patients also despite continuation of treatment without dose alteration. Tumor progression was a rare event. It did not exceed the expected rate in patients with acromegaly not treated with pegvisomant. As from this presently largest database of acromegalic patients treated with pegvisomant, long-term results are encouraging. The German data are now merged into the global ACROSTUDY and will constitute a major portion of the international ACROSTUDY project as a continuing global web-based observational study.

Quality of Life in Acromegalic Patients during Long-Term Somatostatin Analog Treatment with and without Pegvisomant

The objective of the study was to assess whether weekly administration of 40 mg pegvisomant (PEG-V) improves quality of life (QoL) and metabolic parameters in acromegalic patients with normal age-adjusted IGF-I concentrations during long-acting somatostatin analog (SSA) treatment. This was a prospective, investigator-initiated, double blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study. Twenty acromegalic subjects received either PEG-V or placebo for two consecutive treatment periods of 16 wk, separated by a washout period of 4 wk. Efficacy was assessed as change between baseline and end of each treatment period. QoL was assessed by the Acromegaly Quality of Life Questionnaire (AcroQoL) and the Patient-Assessed Acromegaly Symptom Questionnaire (PASQ). The AcroQoL (P = 0.008) and AcroQoL physical (P = 0.002) improved significantly after PEG-V was added. The addition of PEG-V also significantly improved the PASQ (P = 0.038) and the single PASQ questions, perspiration (P = 0.024), soft tissue swelling (P = 0.036), and overall health status (P = 0.035). No significant change in Z-score of IGF-I (P = 0.34) was observed during addition of PEG-V. Transient liver enzyme elevations were observed in five subjects (25%). Improvement in quality of life was observed without significant change in IGF-I after the addition of 40 mg pegvisomant weekly to monthly SSA therapy in acromegalic patients who had normalized IGF-I on SSA monotherapy. These data question the current recommendations in how to assess disease activity in acromegaly. Moreover, the findings question the validity of the current approach of medical treatment in which pegvisomant is used only when SSA therapy has failed to normalize IGF-I.