Patient Acceptable Symptom State Thresholds Research Articles

Clinical Significance Thresholds in Primary and Revision Latarjet Procedures With Comparable Outcome Achievements

Background: Given the variability across populations and settings, defining the MCID and the PASS for the Rowe and ASOSS scores and patients undergoing primary and revision Latarjet it is essential to have accurate benchmarks relevant to these groups when interpreting clinical results. Purpose: To determine the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) thresholds for the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain during sports, Athletic Shoulder Outcome Scoring System (ASOSS), and Rowe scores after primary and revision Latarjet procedures for treatment of shoulder instability. Study Design: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Between January 2018 and January 2020, a retrospective review of 149 patients undergoing primary Latarjet (n = 82) and revision Latarjet (n = 67) to treat shoulder instability was performed in a single institution. Patient-reported outcome measures were collected preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively. The delta was defined as the change between the pre- and postoperative scores. Distribution-based and anchored-based approaches were used to estimate the MCID and the PASS, respectively. The optimal cutoff point and the percentage of patients achieving those thresholds were also calculated. Results: The distribution-based MCIDs after primary Latarjet were 1.1, 7.5, and 9.6 for the VAS, Rowe, and ASOSS scores, respectively. The rates of patients who achieved the MCID thresholds were 93.9%, 98.7%, and 100% for the VAS, Rowe, and ASOSS scores, respectively. The PASS thresholds after primary Latarjet were ≤1, ≥90, and ≥85 for the VAS, Rowe, and ASOSS scores, respectively. The percentages of patients who achieved PASS thresholds were 82.9%, 89%, and 86.5% for the VAS, Rowe, and ASOSS scores, respectively. The distribution-based MCIDs after revision Latarjet were 0.6, 6.2, and 3.4 for the VAS, Rowe, and ASOSS scores, respectively. The rates of patients who achieved MCID thresholds were 89.3%, 100%, and 100% for the VAS, Rowe, and ASOSS scores, respectively. The PASS thresholds were ≤3, ≥87, and ≥86 after revision Latarjet for the VAS, Rowe, and ASOSS scores, respectively. The rates of patients who achieved the PASS thresholds were 88%, 88%, and 91% for the VAS, Rowe, and ASOSS, respectively. Conclusion: This study identified useful values for the MCID and PASS thresholds in VAS, Rowe, and ASOSS scores after primary and revision Latarjet procedures for treating shoulder instability. Most patients achieved MCID and PASS benchmarks, indicating successful primary and revision Latarjet procedure outcomes. These metrics can serve as valuable parameters when analyzing parameters in future studies and have the potential to enhance patient care by optimizing treatment strategies and surgical decision making.

Defining the Patient Acceptable Symptom State Using PROMIS Following Reconstruction of the Progressive Collapsing Foot Deformity

Introduction/Purpose: Although reconstruction of the flexible progressive collapsing foot deformity (PCFD) has been shown to improve patient-reported outcomes (PROs), there is limited data describing postoperative success as defined by patient satisfaction following surgery. Distinct from the minimal clinically important difference (MCID), the patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) is a novel PRO measurement that represents the symptom threshold beyond which patients are satisfied with their postoperative outcome. The primary aim of this study was to use Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function (PF) and Pain Interference (PI) scores in combination with anchor questions to define PASS thresholds following reconstruction of the flexible PCFD. A secondary aim was to analyze how patient-specific variables and certain PCFD reconstruction procedures may impact the probability of reaching PASS thresholds. Methods: Using data collected from a foot and ankle orthopedic registry at a large academic institution, 109 patients who underwent reconstruction of a flexible PCFD between February 2019 and March 2021, had preoperative and 2-year postoperative PROMIS PF and PI scores, and 2-year postoperative responses to two PASS anchor questions (the delighted-terrible scale and the satisfied scale) were included in the study. Patients who underwent either a double or triple arthrodesis were excluded. Patient responses to the anchor questions were dichotomized and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were performed. Using the Youden Index to balance sensitivity and specificity and maximize the area under the curve (AUC), PASS thresholds with 95% confidence intervals were quantified using 2000 bootstrapped iterations. Lastly, multivariable logistic regressions were performed to analyze the influence of patient demographics, preoperative PROMIS scores, and certain PCFD reconstruction procedures on the probability of reaching the PASS thresholds. Results: The PASS threshold for PROMIS PF was found to be 42.6 using both the delighted-terrible and the satisfied scale and 73.4% of patients (80/109) reached the threshold (both AUCs: 0.91) (Table 1). The PASS thresholds for PROMIS PI defined using the delighted-terrible scale and the satisfied scale were 54.5 (AUC: 0.90) and 57.5 (AUC: 0.91), respectively, with 72.5% of patients (79/109) and 81.7% of patients (89/109) meeting the respective thresholds. Neither patient demographics nor specific PCFD reconstruction procedures affected the probability of meeting the PASS thresholds. However, a lower preoperative PROMIS PF score or a higher preoperative PROMIS PI score significantly decreased the probability of achieving the PASS thresholds. Conclusion: Following reconstruction of the flexible PCFD, PASS thresholds for the PROMIS PF and PI domains were found to be lower and higher, respectively, than population norms. This suggests that patients may be satisfied with the outcome of their surgery despite not returning to the population mean. The probability of achieving the PASS thresholds was influenced by both preoperative PROMIS PF and PI scores but not by patient demographics or certain PCFD reconstruction procedures. In addition to guiding future outcomes research, these results may help foot and ankle surgeons optimize treatment for the flexible PCFD and better manage patient expectations.

Defining the Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) for PROMIS After Hallux Valgus Correction Surgery

Introduction/Purpose: Surgical interventions to correct hallux valgus have been shown to improve patient reported outcomes (PROs); however, many of these instruments do not measure a patient’s subjective outcome experience. The patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) is defined as the symptom threshold that a patient must reach to be satisfied with the outcome of their surgery. PASS thresholds have been defined for hallux valgus correction using American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores; however, no studies have used a validated PRO metric. This is the first study that aims to establish PASS thresholds for Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores in patients following operative intervention for hallux valgus. Methods: A retrospective review of prospectively collected data within an institutional registry was performed. We identified 291 patients treated for hallux valgus with or without second hammertoe correction between February 2019 and March 2021 with at least 2-year post-operative PROMIS scores. Chart review was performed to obtain demographic information and to confirm the surgical procedures completed. Two-years post-operatively, patients answered two PASS anchor questions (Satisfaction, Delighted-Terrible scale) with Likert-scale responses, which was collected along with pre-operative and 2-year post-operative PROMIS scores via the registry. After patient’s answers to the Satisfaction and Delighted-Terrible scales were recategorized into binary responses; PASS thresholds were determined using the maximum Youden Index and a 95% confidence interval was quantified using 2000 bootstrapped iterations. Differences in patient and surgical characteristics between patients who met or did not meet the PASS threshold were compared using independent samples t-test and Pearson chi square. Results: There was excellent association between PASS thresholds and the PROMIS domains of Physical Function (50.3, AUC=0.86) and Pain Interference (51.5, AUC=0.86). Overall, 204/291 and 205/291 patients met the threshold for Physical Function (PF) and Pain Interference (PI), respectively. For both PROMIS domains, a lower BMI was associated with a higher likelihood of meeting the PASS threshold (p=0.002 for PF, p=0.032 for PI). For the PF domain, Lapidus patients were more likely to meet the PASS threshold (p=0.05), and patients with first MTP fusion were less likely to meet the PASS threshold (p=0.004). Meeting the PASS threshold wasn’t impacted by the concomitant correction of a second hammertoe. Lastly, patients with a higher pre-operative PF score had a greater chance of meeting the PASS threshold (p < 0.001). Conclusion: This is the first study to define a PASS threshold for hallux valgus correction using PROMIS scores, a validated outcomes measure. Pre-operative PROMIS scores, patient BMI, and the type of procedure performed impacted a patient’s likelihood of meeting the PASS threshold. These results may be helpful in counseling and educating patients on their chances of obtaining a satisfactory result following hallux valgus correction.

Defining the Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) for PROMIS After Hallux Rigidus Correction Surgery

Introduction/Purpose: In an ever-changing healthcare landscape, patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are becoming more important for reimbursement and evaluating the success of surgical procedures. Unfortunately, it is unclear which PROs correlate best with clinical improvement. The patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) asks the patient whether or not their outcome is acceptable at a particular post-operative time point. Recently, the use of this metric has gained traction within the foot and ankle literature. To our knowledge, this is the first study that aims to establish PASS thresholds for Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores in patients who underwent operative intervention for hallux rigidus. Methods: A retrospective review of prospectively collected data within an institutional registry was performed. We identified 174 patients treated for hallux rigidus between February 2019 and March 2021 with at least 2-year post-operative PROMIS scores. Chart review was performed to obtain demographic information and to confirm the surgical procedures that were completed. Two-years post-operatively, patients answered two PASS anchor questions (Satisfaction, Delighted-Terrible scale) with Likert- scale responses, which was collected along with pre-operative and 2-year post-operative PROMIS scores via the registry. After patient’s answers to the Satisfaction and Delighted-Terrible scales were recategorized into binary responses, PASS thresholds were determined using the maximum Youden Index and a 95% confidence interval was quantified using 2000 bootstrapped iterations. Differences in patient and surgical characteristics between patients who met or did not meet the PASS threshold were compared using independent samples t-test and Pearson chi square. Statistical significance was established at an alpha of 0.05. Results: There was excellent association between PASS thresholds and the PROMIS domains of Physical Function (48.6, AUC=0.82) and Pain Interference (52.1, AUC =0.86). Overall, 125/174 (71.8%) and 105/174 (60.3%) patients met the threshold for Physical Function (PF) and Pain Interference (PI), respectively. For the PF and PI domains, age, BMI, method of cheilectomy and use of Akin/Moberg osteotomy did not impact a patient’s likelihood of meeting the PASS threshold. For the PF domain and the PI domain stratified by the Delighted-Terrible scale, women were more likely to meet the PASS threshold than men (63.2% vs. 36.8%, p = 0.057 and 73% vs. 45%, p =0.023, respectively). Lastly, patients with a higher pre-operative PF score had a higher chance of meeting the PASS threshold (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Following operative intervention to treat hallux rigidus, pre-operative PROMIS scores were strongly associated with a patient’s likelihood of meeting the PASS threshold. After surgical intervention for hallux rigidus, less than 75% of the patients felt their outcome was acceptable; however, the PASS threshold for PF was lower than population average, so it may not be necessary for patients to reach normal physical function levels post-operatively in order to have an acceptable outcome.

Defining the patient acceptable symptom state using PROMIS following reconstruction of the progressive collapsing foot deformity

BackgroundThe patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) represents the threshold beyond which patients are satisfied with their outcome. This study aimed to define PASS thresholds for progressive collapsing foot deformity (PCFD) reconstruction using Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores and anchor question responses. MethodsThis retrospective study consisted of 109 patients who underwent flexible PCFD reconstruction, had preoperative and 2-year postoperative PROMIS scores, and 2-year postoperative anchor question responses. ROC curve analyses were performed to quantify PASS thresholds. ResultsPASS thresholds for the PROMIS Physical Function (PF) and Pain Interference (PI) domains were found to be lower and higher, respectively, than population norms. Furthermore, patients with higher preoperative PROMIS PF scores or lower preoperative PROMIS PI scores had a significantly higher likelihood of achieving the PASS thresholds. ConclusionIn addition to guiding future outcomes research, these results may help surgeons optimize treatment for PCFD and better manage patient expectations. Level of evidenceIII, retrospective cohort study

Quadriceps Tendon Autograft ACL Reconstruction With Suture Tape Augmentation: Safe Results Based on Minimum 2-Year Follow-up MRI.

The potential intra-articular effects of ≥1 year after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with independent suture tape augmentation (STA) are not fully understood. To investigate whether incorporating suture tape in an all-soft tissue quadriceps tendon autograft (QTA) ACLR leads to satisfactory patient outcomes while having no intra-articular side effects as determined by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Included were 25 patients with a mean age of 19.9 years (95% CI, 17.3-22.5 years) who underwent QTA ACLR with STA between 2016 and 2019. All patients underwent MRI at ≥1 year postoperatively and had at least a 2-year follow-up (mean, 28 months [95% CI, 26.5-29.5 months]) that included physical examination with anterior laxity testing with KT-1000 arthrometer, radiographs, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). At the final follow-up, the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and the Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) for applicable PROMs were applied to each patient. Postoperative graft and joint integrity were assessed using the Howell classification and the MRI Osteoarthritis Knee Score (MOAKS) joint effusion/synovitis grade. The Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables and the chi-square or the Fisher exact test for categorical variables were used for statistical analyses. The MRI assessment of the grafts demonstrated intact grafts in all patients. Overall, 96% of patients demonstrated grades 0 or 1 MOAKS for joint effusion/synovitis. All patient outcomes significantly improved from preoperatively to the final follow-up (P < .001), except for the Marx score, which decreased significantly (14.2 [95% CI, 12.7-15.8] vs 9.72 [95% CI, 7.3-12.2]; P = .0014). At least 68% of the patients achieved the MCID threshold, and 92% achieved the PASS threshold for all applicable PROMs. QTA ACLR with STA did not demonstrate adverse intra-articular changes on MRI at ≥1 year postoperatively. In addition, STA did not appear to negatively affect PROMs.

Establishing the Patient Acceptable Symptom State Thresholds for Patient-Reported Outcomes after Operatively Treated Tibial Plateau Fractures.

Define patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS) thresholds and factors affecting PASS thresholds for Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function (PF) and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) following operatively treated tibial plateau fractures. Retrospective cohort. Single Level I academic trauma center. All patients (n = 159) who underwent fixation of a tibial plateau fracture from 2016 to 2021 and completed patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) at minimum 1-year follow-up were enrolled for the study. PASS thresholds for global outcome (PASS-Global), pain (PASS-Pain), and function (PASS-Function) were determined using anchor-based questions such as "How satisfied are you today with your injured lower extremity?" with answer choices of very satisfied, satisfied, neutral, unsatisfied, and very unsatisfied. PASS thresholds for each PROM were calculated using 3 methods: (1) 80% specificity, (2) 75th percentile, and (3) Youden Index. Sixty percent of patients were satisfied with their global outcome and 53% with function. Using 80% specificity, 75th percentile, and Youden Index, PASS-Global thresholds were 48.5, 44.5, and 47.9 for PROMIS-PF and 56.3, 56.2, and 56.3 for KOOS-QOL, respectively. PASS-Pain threshold for KOOS-Pain was 84.4, 80.6, and 80.6, respectively. PASS-Function thresholds were 48.9, 46.8, and 48 for PROMIS-PF and 94.1, 90.2, and 86.8 for KOOS-ADL, respectively. Younger patients and those with bicondylar fractures or infections were associated with significantly lower PASS-Pain thresholds. Schatzker II fractures, lateral column involvement, or isolated lateral approach resulted in significantly higher PASS-Global and PASS-Function thresholds. This study defines global, functional, and pain PASS thresholds for tibial plateau fractures. Patients with bicondylar fractures, infections, and medial column involvement were more often unsatisfied. These thresholds are valuable references to identify patients who have attained satisfactory outcomes and to counsel patients with risk factors for unsatisfactory outcomes following tibial plateau fractures. Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Diagnosis-Specific Thresholds of the Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State for KOOS After Total Knee Arthroplasty.

This article was updated on May 1, 2024 because of a previous error, which was discovered after the preliminary version of the article was posted online. The byline that had read "Ahmed K. Emara, MD 1 *, Ignacio Pasqualini, MD 1 *, Alison K. Klika, MS 1 , Melissa N. Orr, BS 1 , Pedro J. Rullán, MD 1 , Nicolas S. Piuzzi, MD 1 , and the Cleveland Clinic Arthroplasty Group†" now reads "Ahmed K. Emara, MD 1 *, Ignacio Pasqualini, MD 1 *, Yuxuan Jin, MS 1 , Alison K. Klika, MS 1 , Melissa N. Orr, BS 1 , Pedro J. Rullán, MD 1 , Nicolas S. Piuzzi, MD 1 , and the Cleveland Clinic Arthroplasty Group†". Literature-reported minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) thresholds for patient-reported outcome measures demonstrate marked variability. The purpose of this study was to determine the minimal detectable change (MDC), MCID, and PASS thresholds for the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Pain subdomain, Physical Function Short Form (PS), and Joint Replacement (JR) among patients with osteoarthritis (OA) who underwent primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). A prospective cohort of 6,778 patients who underwent primary TKA was analyzed. Overall, 1-year follow-up was completed by 5,316 patients for the KOOS Pain, 5,018 patients for the KOOS PS, and 4,033 patients for the KOOS JR. A total of 5,186 patients had an OA diagnosis; this group had an average age of 67.0 years and was 59.9% female and 80.4% White. Diagnosis-specific MDCs and MCIDs were estimated with use of a distribution-based approach. PASS values were estimated with use of an anchor-based approach, which corresponded to a response to a satisfaction question at 1 year postoperatively. The MCID thresholds for the OA group were 7.9 for the KOOS Pain, 8.0 for the KOOS PS, and 6.7 for the KOOS JR. A high percentage of patients achieved the MCID threshold for each outcome measure (KOOS Pain, 95%; KOOS PS, 88%; and KOOS JR, 94%). The MDC 80% to 95% confidence intervals ranged from 9.1 to 14.0 for the KOOS Pain, 9.2 to 14.1 for the KOOS PS, and 7.7 to 11.8 for the KOOS JR. The PASS thresholds for the OA group were 77.7 for the KOOS Pain (achieved by 73% of patients), 70.3 for the KOOS PS (achieved by 68% of patients), and 70.7 for the KOOS JR (achieved by 70% of patients). The present study provided useful MCID, MDC, and PASS thresholds for the KOOS Pain, PS, and JR for patients with OA. The diagnosis-specific metrics established herein can serve as benchmarks for clinically meaningful postoperative improvement. Future research and quality assessments should utilize these OA-specific thresholds when evaluating outcomes following TKA. Doing so will enable more accurate determinations of operative success and improvements in patient-centered care. Prognostic Level II . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

The Promising 2-Year Performance of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System in Primary Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome

Background: Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) thresholds have been previously defined for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) at 1-year follow-up in patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome; however, the MCID and PASS thresholds are yet to be defined for the PROMIS at 2-year follow-up. Purpose: (1) To establish MCID and PASS thresholds for the PROMIS Pain Interference (PROMIS-PI) and PROMIS Physical Function (PROMIS-PF) at 2-year follow-up and (2) to correlate PROMIS scores with hip-specific patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) scores. Study Design: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Patients undergoing primary hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome between August and November 2020 with preoperative and minimum 2-year postoperative data were identified. Collected scores included those for the PROMIS-PI, PROMIS-PF, Hip Outcome Score–Activities of Daily Living (HOS-ADL), Hip Outcome Score–Sports Subscale (HOS-SS), International Hip Outcome Tool–12 (iHOT-12), and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain. MCID thresholds were calculated using the distribution-based method and PASS thresholds using the anchor-based method. Pearson correlation coefficients were used to compare scores between PROMs. Results: A total of 65 patients met the criteria for inclusion (72.3% female; mean age, 36.9 ± 13.5 years; mean body mass index, 26.2 ± 6.0). The mean follow-up was 25.3 ± 3.3 months. Significant preoperative to postoperative improvements were observed for all PROMs (P < .001). MCID thresholds and achievement rates were as follows: HOS-ADL, 10.1 and 75%, respectively; HOS-SS, 13.8 and 79%, respectively; iHOT-12, 14.0 and 67%, respectively; VAS pain, –13.8 and 78%, respectively; PROMIS-PI, –4.7 and 65%, respectively; and PROMIS-PF, 5.8 and 60%, respectively. PASS thresholds and achievement rates were as follows: HOS-ADL, 78.7 and 67%, respectively; HOS-SS, 76.4 and 62%, respectively; iHOT-12, 67.4 and 60%, respectively; VAS pain, 25.5 and 61%, respectively; PROMIS-PI, 57.0 and 65%, respectively; and PROMIS-PF, 45.6 and 58%, respectively. PROMIS-PI scores correlated most strongly with HOS-ADL (r = −0.836), HOS-SS (r = −0.767), and iHOT-12 (r = −0.719) scores and exhibited at least moderate correlations (r≥−0.595) with the other PROM scores. PROMIS-PF demonstrated moderate correlations with all the other PROM scores (r≥−0.586). Strong correlations were seen between the hip-specific PROM scores (r≥−0.745). Conclusion: This study defined 2-year MCID and PASS thresholds for the PROMIS-PI and PROMIS-PF and demonstrated moderate to strong correlations between PROMIS scores and hip-specific PROM scores.

Variability of MCID, SCB, and PASS Thresholds in Studies Assessing Patient-Reported Outcomes After Rotator Cuff Repair: A Systematic Review.

An increasing reliance on patient-reported outcomes has led to greater emphasis on minimal clinically important difference (MCID), substantial clinical benefit (SCB), and Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) thresholds in assessing rotator cuff repairs. To review the MCID, SCB, and PASS thresholds reported for patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after rotator cuff repair. Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. The PubMed, Embase, Ovid, Cochrane, and Google Scholar databases were queried for full-text journal articles in English published between January 1, 2000, and May 31, 2022. Studies with MCID, SCB, and PASS thresholds reported for patients with rotator cuff repair and a minimum of 12 months of follow-up were included. Reported MCID, SCB, and PASS thresholds and associated calculation methods were extracted. There were 41 unique studies (6331 shoulders) that met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 37 (90%) reported MCID; 16 (39%), PASS; and 11 (27%), SCB values. The most common PROMs were the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score and the Constant-Murley score. In total, 71% (29/41) of these studies referenced values in the literature, usually studies of patients undergoing rotator cuff repair (21/29). Twelve studies calculated MCID, SCB, or PASS thresholds using anchor-based approaches, whereas 6 studies also calculated thresholds using distribution-based methods. The use of MCID, SCB, and PASS in the rotator cuff repair literature is increasing, with half of the included studies published within the final 17 months of the studied period. Significant variability was seen in the reporting of MCID, SCB, and PASS threshold values after rotator cuff repair. Researchers should prioritize studies that report clinical outcome thresholds calculated using anchor-based methods and should critically review both the anchor question and its response choices. Standardization of MCID, SCB, and PASS values and calculation methods will allow for a more reliable assessment of PROMs in rotator cuff repair moving forward.

What Are the Diagnosis-Specific Thresholds of Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State in Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty?

BackgroundThis study aimed to determine the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) thresholds for Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) pain, physical short form (PS), and joint replacement (JR) 1 year after primary total hip arthroplasty stratified by preoperative diagnosis of osteoarthritis (OA) versus non-OA. MethodsA prospective institutional cohort of 5,887 patients who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty (January 2016 to December 2018) was included. There were 4,184 patients (77.0%) who completed a one-year follow-up. Demographics, comorbidities, and baseline and one-year HOOS pain, PS, and JR scores were recorded. Patients were stratified by preoperative diagnosis: OA or non-OA. Minimal detectable change (MDC) and MCIDs were estimated using a distribution-based approach. The PASS values were estimated using an anchor-based approach, which corresponded to a response to a satisfaction question at one year post surgery. ResultsThe MCID thresholds were slightly higher in the non-OA cohort versus OA patients. (HOOS-Pain: OA: 8.35 versus non-OA: 8.85 points; HOOS-PS: OA: 9.47 versus non-OA: 9.90 points; and HOOS-JR: OA: 7.76 versus non-OA: 8.46 points). Similarly, all MDC thresholds were consistently higher in the non-OA cohort compared to OA patients. The OA cohort exhibited similar or higher PASS thresholds compared to the non-OA cohort for HOOS-Pain (OA: ≥80.6 versus non-OA: ≥77.5 points), HOOS-PS (OA: ≥83.6 versus non-OA: ≥83.6 points), and HOOS-JR (OA: ≥76.8 versus non-OA: ≥73.5 points). A similar percentage of patients achieved MCID and PASS thresholds regardless of preoperative diagnosis. ConclusionsWhile MCID and MDC thresholds for all HOOS subdomains were slightly higher among non-OA than OA patients, PASS thresholds for HOOS pain and JR were slightly higher in the OA group. The absolute magnitude of the difference in these thresholds may not be sufficient to cause major clinical differences. However, these subtle differences may have a significant impact when used as indicators of operative success in a population setting.

Outcomes of Isolated Endoscopic Gluteal Tendon Repair Compared With Concomitant Endoscopic Gluteal Tendon Repair and Arthroscopic Hip Labral Repair: A Propensity-Matched Analysis With Minimum 2-Year Follow-up.

Both gluteal and labral tears are common sources of hip pain, but no studies have evaluated how concomitant arthroscopic labral repair and correction of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) affect outcomes after endoscopic gluteus/minimus repair. (1) To compare patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and clinically significant outcomes achievements between patients who underwent endoscopic gluteus medius/minimus and arthroscopic hip labral repair with correction of FAIS versus endoscopic gluteus medius/minimus repair without labral repair and (2) to define threshold scores required to achieve the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and the Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) for the Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living, Hip Outcome Score-Sports Specific, modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), 12-item international Hip Outcome Tool, and visual analog scale for pain in these patients. Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Patients who underwent primary endoscopic gluteus medius/minimus repair between 2012 and 2020 were identified. Those who underwent concomitant arthroscopic labral repair and correction of FAIS with femoroplasty or acetabuloplasty as indicated were propensity matched in a 1 to 1 ratio by sex, age, and body mass index to patients who underwent gluteus medius/minimus repair without labral repair. Patients who completed the study PROs were assessed preoperatively and at 2 years postoperatively. Threshold scores required to achieve the MCID and PASS thresholds were calculated. A total of 32 patients who underwent simultaneous gluteal and labral repair (G+L) were matched to 32 patients who underwent gluteal repair without labral repair (G); 75% of patients in the G cohort underwent labral debridement, while 25% in this cohort received no labral treatment. A significant difference was observed between groups in preoperative mHHS scores (G+L, 54.4 ± 12.9 vs G, 46.3 ± 14; P = .048) but no differences in any other PRO scores (P≥ .207). The MCID/PASS thresholds were as follows: Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living (11.14/83.82), Hip Outcome Score-Sports Specific (16.07/59.72), mHHS (11.47/70.95), 12-item international Hip Outcome Tool (13.73/45.49), and visual analog scale for pain (14.30/22). There were no significant differences in MCID or PASS achievement rates between the 2 groups (P≥ .108). Patients who underwent combined G+L demonstrated comparable PROs and clinically significant outcomes achievement rates to patients who underwent G, highlighting sustained successful outcomes for patients with gluteal tendon pathology and concomitant FAIS and labral tears.

Hip Arthroscopic Surgery With Chondrolabral Refixation, Osteochondroplasty, and Routine Capsular Closure for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: Clinical Outcomes at a Minimum 10-Year Follow-up

Background: Hip arthroscopic surgery for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) has proven to be an effective surgical intervention, with high rates of return to sport and work as well as favorable outcomes at short- and midterm follow-up. However, limited data exist on outcomes at long-term follow-up. Purpose: To evaluate patient-reported outcomes (PROs) at a minimum 10-year follow-up after primary hip arthroscopic surgery including labral repair, femoral osteochondroplasty, acetabular osteochondroplasty, and capsular closure for FAIS. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Patients who underwent primary hip arthroscopic surgery for FAIS between June 2012 and January 2013 were identified. PROs were collected preoperatively and at a minimum of 10 years postoperatively, including the Hip Outcome Score–Activities of Daily Living (HOS-ADL), Hip Outcome Score–Sports Subscale (HOS-SS), modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), International Hip Outcome Tool–12 (iHOT-12), and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain and satisfaction. Unique minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) thresholds were calculated, and their rates of achievement were analyzed. An alpha level of <.05 was used to determine statistical significance. Results: A total of 94 patients (55 female; mean age, 34.3 ± 12.4 years) were analyzed with a mean follow-up of 10.1 ± 0.3 years (range, 10.0-10.7 years). Patients demonstrated significant 10-year improvement across all PRO measures (P < .001). MCID and PASS thresholds were calculated as follows: HOS-ADL (10.4 and 85.3, respectively), HOS-SS (14.6 and 60.2, respectively), mHHS (8.8 and 76.0, respectively), VAS pain (14.6 and 27.5, respectively), and iHOT-12 (PASS: 71.4). The majority of patients achieved the MCID and PASS for each PRO measure: HOS-ADL (73.4% and 70.9%, respectively), HOS-SS (78.5% and 77.2%, respectively), mHHS (81.0% and 70.9%, respectively), VAS pain (88.6% and 70.9%, respectively), and iHOT-12 (PASS: 73.4%). Overall, 9 patients (9.6%) underwent subsequent revision hip arthroscopic surgery at a mean 4.9 ± 3.7 years (range, 1.1-10.1 years) postoperatively, and 6 patients (6.4%) underwent conversion to total hip arthroplasty at a mean 4.1 ± 3.1 years (range, 0.9-9.3 years) postoperatively. Conclusion: Patients who underwent primary hip arthroscopic surgery for FAIS utilizing contemporary methods of labral repair, acetabular and/or femoral osteochondroplasty, and capsular closure commonly experienced sustained clinical improvement and reported high levels of satisfaction at a minimum 10-year follow-up with low rates of reoperation.

Effect of Patient Characteristics on the Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State Thresholds After Arthroscopic Bankart Repair

Background: There is scarce literature on clinically significant values after arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR). Purpose: To determine the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and the patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) thresholds at 1 year for the Rowe and Athletic Shoulder Outcome Scoring System (ASOSS) scores after ABR and to determine the effect of patient characteristics on these metrics after ABR. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A retrospective review of patients undergoing ABR from a single institution between January 2017 and January 2020 was performed. Patients with at least 1 episode of instability and a minimum follow-up of 12 months were included. The exclusion criteria were as follows: bony defects of >20% on the anteroinferior portion of the glenoid based on a preoperative computed tomography scan; engaging Hill-Sachs lesions at 90° of abduction and 90° of external rotation based on an arthroscopic examination; previous surgery on the same shoulder; multidirectional instability or concomitant repair of full-thickness rotator cuff tears; superior labral anterior to posterior lesions; posterior labral tears; or humeral avulsion of the glenohumeral ligament lesions. Patient-reported outcome measures were collected both preoperatively and 1-year postoperatively. Delta was defined as the change between preoperative and 1-year postoperative scores. Distribution-based (one-half the standard deviation of the difference between pre- and postoperative outcome scores) and anchored-based approaches (response to a satisfaction question at 1 year) were used to estimate the MCID and the PASS, respectively. The optimal cutoff point, where sensitivity and specificity were maximized, and the percentage of patients achieving those thresholds were also calculated. Results: Overall, 190 patients were included. The distribution-based MCID for the Rowe and ASOSS scores were calculated to be 8.2 and 8.7, respectively. The rate of patients who achieved MCID thresholds was 96% for the Rowe and 96% for ASOSS scores. The PASS threshold for the Rowe and ASOSS scores were ≥80 and ≥90, respectively. The rate of patients who achieved PASS scores after ABR were 86% and 83%, respectively. The MCID and PASS values showed great variability based on sex (men: 8.5 and ≥85 for Rowe / 8.9 and ≥90 for ASOSS, respectively, vs women: 6.7 and ≥73 for Rowe / 8.1 and ≥75 for ASOSS), age (≥21: 8.4 and ≥80 / 9.2 and ≥90 vs <21: 7.8 and ≥75 / 7.7 and ≥85), sports participation (sports: 8.8 and ≥85 / 9.5 and ≥90 vs no sports: 8.1 and ≥75 / 8.6 and ≥80), and type of athlete (competitive: 8.4 and ≥85 / 8.9 and ≥87 vs recreational: 7.5 and ≥73 / 8.1 and ≥68). Conclusion: This study identified the MCID and PASS thresholds for the Rowe and ASOSS scores at 1 year after ABR. However, these values showed great variability when accounting for different patient characteristics such as sex, age, sports participation, and type of athlete, highlighting the importance of considering individual patient-specific characteristics for optimal treatment decision-making and ensuring treatment success tailored to each patient’s unique needs and expectations.

Patient Acceptable Symptom State Thresholds for the Knee Society Score, Oxford Knee Score, and 36-Item Short Form Survey Ten Years Following Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

BackgroundThe patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) refers to a cutoff value on any patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) scale, beyond which patients consider themselves as having achieved an acceptable outcome. This study aimed to identify PASS thresholds for knee-specific and generic PROMs at 10 years post-unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). MethodsThere were 269 patients who underwent UKA for medial osteoarthritis from 2004 to 2007 at a single institution and were surveyed preoperatively and 10 years postoperatively using the Knee Society Function Score (KSFS), Knee Society Knee Score (KSKS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) Mental Component Score (MCS), and SF-36 Physical Component Score (PCS). Treatment outcomes and expectations were assessed using an anchor question, and PASS attainment was determined using the Youden index on a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Also, a similar study that identified 2-year long-term PROM PASS thresholds for UKA was referenced and compared. ResultsOverall, 91.1% reported acceptable outcomes. The area under the curve for ROCs of KSKS, OKS, and PCS were 0.80, 0.75, and 0.71, respectively. The area under the curve for ROCs of KSFS and MCS were both 0.64. The PASS thresholds were 67.5 for KSFS, 70.5 for KSKS, 39.5 for OKS, 44.6 for PCS, and 43.8 for MCS. Patients who achieved a PASS were at least 3 times more likely to have satisfactory outcomes. ConclusionsTo our knowledge, this is the first study that identified 10-year long-term PROM PASS thresholds for UKA. Accounting for our finding that a decade-long follow-up yielded lower PASS thresholds, time-specific UKA PROM PASS thresholds should be considered. Level of evidenceIII.

Defining Thresholds and Predictors for Achieving the Patient Acceptable Symptom State for Patient-Reported Outcome Measures After Revision Hip Arthroscopy

Background: The Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) after primary hip arthroscopy has been determined; nonetheless, the PASS still needs to be defined for revision hip arthroscopy. Purpose: To define minimum 2-year follow-up PASS thresholds for the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), Nonarthritic Hip Score (NAHS), Hip Outcome Score–Sports Specific Subscale (HOS-SSS), visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, and International Hip Outcome Tool-12 (iHOT-12) after revision hip arthroscopy, and to identify predictors of achieving the PASS. Study Design: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Data were prospectively collected and retrospectively reviewed for all patients who underwent revision hip arthroscopy between April 2017 and July 2020. Patients were included if they had baseline and minimum 2-year follow-up scores for the mHHS, NAHS, HOS-SSS, VAS for pain, and iHOT-12. PASS was calculated using the anchor-based method. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to determine the thresholds for the PASS. A multivariate logistic regression was used to identify predictors for achieving the PASS. Results: A total of 318 patients who underwent revision hip arthroscopy met the inclusion criteria. Of those patients, 292 (91.8%) had baseline and minimum 2-year follow-up. Of this group, 68 patients (72.1% female and 27.9% male; mean age, 32.9 years) answered the PASS anchor question. Achievement PASS rates were 58.8%, 41.2%, 52.9%, 60.3%, and 52.9% for the mHHS, NAHS, HOS-SSS, VAS, and iHOT-12, respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) values for the PASS for mHHS, NAHS, HOS-SSS, VAS, and iHOT-12 were 0.912, 0.888, 0.857, 0.903, and 0.871, respectively, indicating excellent discrimination. The PASS for the mHHS was 76 (sensitivity, 0.809; specificity, 0.905), for the NAHS was 86.3 (sensitivity, 0.660; specificity, 1), for the HOS-SSS was 64.3 (sensitivity, 0.745; specificity, 0.905), for the VAS was 3 (sensitivity, 0.830; specificity, 0.905), and for the iHOT-12 was 64.3 (sensitivity, 0.745; specificity, 0.905). Body mass index (BMI) was identified as a significant predictor of achieving PASS for the NAHS (OR, 0.967; 95% CI, 0.940-0.996; P = .027), as patients with a BMI ≤25.4 had 1.03 times higher odds ratio of achieving PASS for the NAHS. Conclusion: After revision hip arthroscopy, the minimum 2-year follow-up PASS thresholds for the mHHS, NAHS, HOS-SSS, VAS for pain, and iHOT-12 were 76, 86.3, 64.3, 3, and 64.3, respectively. The odds ratio of achieving PASS for the NAHS was 1.03 times higher for patients with a BMI ≤25.4.

Intra-operative laxity and balance impact 2-year pain outcomes in TKA: a prospective cohort study.

The objective of this study was to determine if intra-operatively measured joint gaps are associated with 2-year pain outcomes in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and whether balance and laxity windows could be defined throughout flexion to optimize 2-year pain outcomes. Our hypothesis is that intra-operative joint gaps are associated with 2year post-operative pain outcome. A prospective study investigating 310 robotically assisted TKAs was performed. Final intra-operative joint gap data were recorded using a digital tensioner and component alignment data were recorded by the robotics system. Patient demographics and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) were recorded pre-operatively and KOOS and Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) satisfaction were recorded at 2 years post-op. A random search Simulated Annealing (SANN) optimisation algorithm was used to determine global optimum laxity and balance windows at different flexion angles which maximized the 2-year KOOS pain scores. The windows were combined to determine the impact of achieving optimal laxity and balance throughout flexion. To improve clinical utility, boundaries identified by the SANN algorithm were rounded to the nearest 0.5mm before statistical analysis. Laxity and balance windows were defined in extension (Med lax: -2.0 to 2.5mm, Lat lax: -0.5 to 2.5mm, Balance: -3.0 to 0.0mm), mid-flexion (Med lax: -1.0 to 2.5mm, Lat lax: -0.5 to 3.0mm, Balance: -2.0 to 2.0mm), and flexion (Med lax: -2.0 to 3.5mm, Lat lax: -2.0 to 1.5mm, Balance: -3.0 to 3.0mm). When all windows were satisfied, the greatest difference in KOOS pain score was observed (100.0 vs 94.4, p < 0.0001). The highest percentage of knees satisfying the Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) for KOOS pain was also observed in knees which satisfied all windows compared to knees which did not (93% vs 71%, p = 0.0009). The proportion of knees which satisfy the PASS threshold decreased in knees which only satisfied 1-3 (29%) or 4-6 (69%) windows (p ≤ 0.0018). No optimal windows were found between component alignment and KOOS pain outcome (p ≥ 0.1180). High satisfaction was found across all groups (≥ 95%). Intra-operatively measured joint gaps are associated with all KOOS sub-score outcomes at 2 years after TKA. Optimal windows for a clinically relevant improvement in post-operative KOOS pain were defined for laxity and balance but not for alignment indicating balance may have a greater impact on outcome than alignment. II.

Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score interpretation thresholds at 3 and 12 months after arthroscopic meniscal surgery. What changes, and what stays the same?

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the change in minimal important change (MIC), patient acceptable symptom state (PASS), and treatment failure (TF) thresholds for the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) from 3 to 12 months following arthroscopic meniscus surgery. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: We included patients from the Knee Arthroscopy Cohort Southern Denmark who had meniscus surgery between 2013 and 2015. We calculated the interpretation threshold values for MIC, PASS, and TF using an anchor-based adjusted predictive modeling method. Thresholds at 3 and 12 months postoperatively were compared to evaluate changes over time. RESULTS: The proportions of people who reported a clinically relevant improvement, or their symptoms being acceptable, increased by 10-15% points from 3 to 12 months after surgery. MIC thresholds for the five KOOS subscales remained stable from 3 to 12 months with statistically non-significant differences (95% confidence intervals) ranging from -0.3 (-3.0; 2.6) to -2.4 (-6.1; 1.3). All PASS thresholds except for QOL decreased by -6.5 (-11.8; -1.5) to -3.7 (-7.1; -0.4) points, indicating higher symptom-levels were accepted at 12 months. In contrast, the proportion reporting their treatment to have failed remained stable over time (19% and 17%). For QOL, a 7.4 (2.0; 13.2) higher TF threshold at 12 months suggested improved QOL was required to not consider that the treatment had failed. CONCLUSION: More patients reported being improved at one year compared to at 3 months following meniscus surgery. The KOOS MIC thresholds were stable over time, whereas time-specific PASS values should be applied after meniscus surgery.

Defining the Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) for PROMIS After Total Ankle Replacement

Category: Ankle Arthritis; Other Introduction/Purpose: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs), such as PROMIS, are a key element of evaluating success after total ankle replacement (TAR). To date, most PROs are described using absolute values or parameters like the minimum clinically important difference. However, these interpretations do not explicitly tell the surgeon the most important factor of postoperative success: is the patient satisfied with their outcome after TAR? The patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) is a novel PRO metric that attempts to bridge this gap. PASS represents the symptom threshold above which patients consider themselves well. This study aimed to establish the PROMIS thresholds for PASS in a primary cohort of TAR patients. We hypothesized that TAR patients would meet PASS and that PASS would vary with demographic variables. Methods: This is a single-institution retrospective cohort study of primary TAR patients (n=127; mean age 63.2 years; mean BMI 29.0 kg/m2; 58% male) with preoperative and 2-year postoperative PROMIS scores (domains: Physical Function, Pain Interference, Pain Intensity, Global Mental Health, Global Physical Health, &amp; Depression). At 2 years postoperatively, patients also answered 2 PASS anchor questions with Likert-scale responses: 1) Are you satisfied with the results of your surgery?; and 2) the Delighted- Terrible symptom scale. PASS thresholds with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using the anchors “Very satisfied” or “Satisfied” for question 1 and “Delighted,” “Pleased,” or “Mostly Satisfied” for question 2. Using bootstrapping technique with 1000 iterations, the Youden Index was then calculated to determine the best coordinates of specificity and sensitivity to maximize the Area Under the Curve (AUC). Finally, we analyzed preoperative variables (demographics, clinical/surgical data, and preoperative PROMIS scores) on the likelihood of achieving PASS. Results: There was a strong association between PASS thresholds and PROMIS domains, especially Physical Function (PASS threshold &gt;44.7, AUC 0.883), Pain Interference (&lt; 56.0, AUC 0.940), and Pain Intensity (&lt; 48.4, AUC 0.936). Covariate stratification demonstrated that the likelihood of achieving PASS was not affected by age, race, gender, ASA score, or BMI. PASS was less likely to be achieved by patients who had undergone prior orthopaedic surgery (P=0.013). Patients with diabetes mellitus and peripheral vascular disease were less likely to meet PASS for Physical Function (P=0.010, P=0.037), but did meet PASS for Pain domains. Patients with worse preoperative Physical Function and Depression scores were less likely to meet PASS for Physical Function postoperatively (P=0.028, P=0.041), but achieved similar PASS for Pain Interference and Pain Intensity domains. Conclusion: After TAR, the ability to reach the postoperative PASS was most strongly associated with postoperative pain scores, as evidenced by the Pain Interference and Pain Intensity domains. However, the thresholds for PASS were generally lower than population means. This demonstrates that TAR patients do not need to reach normal pain or physical function levels in order to have an acceptable symptom state postoperatively. Moreover, the ability to achieve PASS was not affected by demographic variables. Further research on PASS is warranted, and may shift how surgeons and researchers evaluate TAR patients pre- and post-operatively.

Defining Patient-relevant Thresholds and Change Scores for the HOOS JR and KOOS JR Anchored on the Patient-acceptable Symptom State Question.

When evaluating the results of clinical research studies, readers need to know that patients perceive effect sizes, not p values. Knowing the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) and the patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS) threshold for patient-reported outcome measures helps us to ascertain whether our interventions result in improvements that are large enough for patients to care about, and whether our treatments alleviate patient symptoms sufficiently. Prior studies have developed the MCID and PASS threshold for the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (HOOS JR) and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS JR) anchored on satisfaction with surgery, but to our knowledge, neither the MCID nor the PASS thresholds for these instruments anchored on a single-item PASS question have been described. (1) What are the MCID (defined here as the HOOS/KOOS JR change score associated with achieving PASS) and PASS threshold for the HOOS JR and KOOS JR anchored on patient responses to the single-item PASS instrument? (2) How do patient demographic factors such as age, gender, and BMI correlate with MCID and PASS thresholds using the single-item PASS instrument? Between July 2020 and September 2021, a total of 10,970 patients underwent one primary unilateral THA or TKA and completed at least one of the three surveys (preoperative HOOS or KOOS JR, 1-year postoperative HOOS or KOOS JR, and 1-year postoperative single-item anchor) at one large, academic medical center. Of those, only patients with data for all three surveys were eligible, leaving 13% (1465 total; 783 THAs and 682 TKAs) for analysis. Despite this low percentage, the overall sample size was large, and there was little difference between completers and noncompleters in terms of demographics or baseline patient-reported outcome measure scores. Patients undergoing bilateral total joint arthroplasty or revision total joint arthroplasty and those without all three surveys at 1 year of follow-up were excluded. A receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, leveraging a 1-year, single-item PASS (that is, "Do you consider that your current state is satisfactory?" with possible answers of "yes" or "no") as the anchor was then used to establish the MCID and PASS thresholds among the 783 included patients who underwent primary unilateral THA and 682 patients who underwent primary unilateral TKA. We also explored the associations of age at the time of surgery (younger than 65 years or 65 years and older), gender (men or women), BMI (< 30 or ≥ 30 kg/m 2 ), and baseline Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Information System-10 physical and mental component scores (< 50 or ≥ 50) for each of the MCID and PASS thresholds through stratified analyses. For the HOOS JR, the MCID associated with the PASS was 23 (95% CI 18 to 31), with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.75, and the PASS threshold was 81 (95% CI 77 to 85), with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.81. For the KOOS JR, the MCID was 16 (95% CI 14 to 18), with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.75, and the PASS threshold was 71 (95% CI 66 to 73) with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.84. Stratified analyses indicated higher change scores and PASS threshold for younger men undergoing THA and higher PASS thresholds for older women undergoing TKA. Here, we demonstrated the utility of a single patient-centered anchor question, raising the question as to whether simply collecting a postoperative PASS is an easier way to measure success than collecting preoperative and postoperative patient-reported outcome measures and then calculating MCIDs and the substantial clinical benefit. Level III, therapeutic study.