Pathological Complete Remission Rate Research Articles

Comparison of immunochemotherapy and chemotherapy alone in conversion therapy for locally advanced unresectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

The clinical value of preoperative immunochemotherapy and simple chemotherapy induction regimen in the conversion therapy of locally advanced unresectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is still unclear. Retrospective analysis was conducted on patients with unresectable cT4b stage ESCC who underwent conversion surgery in our hospital from January 2020 to December 2022. According to the preoperative induction treatment plan, they were divided into induction immunochemotherapy group (iICT group) and induction chemotherapy group (iCT group). The conversion surgery rate, R0 resection rate, radiological and pathological tumor responses, safety, and short-term survival outcomes were analyzed. The results showed that a total of 199 patients with cT4b locally advanced unresectable ESCC who underwent preoperative induction therapy were included in this study. Among them, there were 64 cases (32.2%) in the iICT group, 135 cases (67.8%) in the iCT group. There was a statistically significant difference in objective response rate (73.5% vs 48.9%) and conversion surgery rate (81.3% vs 66.7%), between the iICT and iCT groups (P=0.001 and P=0.019). Among the two groups of patients who underwent surgery, there were statistically significant differences in R0 resection rate (94.2% vs 82.2%) and pathological complete remission rate (23.1% vs 6.7%) between the iICT and iCT groups (P=0.043 and P=0.004). And there was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of grade 3 and above between two groups (P=0.928). The 2-year EFS of the iICT group and iCT group were 76.4% and 42.4%, respectively, with statistically significant differences (P=0.006). Compared with simple chemotherapy, the combination of PD-1 inhibitors and chemotherapy can achieve better conversion surgery rate, tumor response and event-free survival in the conversion therapy of locally advanced unresectable ESCC.

Preliminary results from a multi-center phase Ib/II study of RC48-ADC combined with tislelizumab as neoadjuvant treatment in patients with HER2 positive locally advanced muscle-invasive urothelial bladder cancer (Hope-03).

e16595 Background: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of RC48-ADC, a humanized anti-HER2 antibody conjugated with monomethyl auristatin E, and tislelizumab, a PD-1 antibody, as a novel neoadjuvant treatment combination in patients with HER2 positive locally advanced muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). The study design has been presented at 2022 ESMO Asia meeting. The preliminary results would be reported this time. Methods: This is a Ib/II, multi-center, open-label, single-arm study (ChiECRCT20210564). 51 patients with pathological and imaging diagnosed cT2-4bN0-3M0-1a HER2 positive MIBC will be included. RC48-ADC is given every 2 weeks with a maximum dose of 120mg intravenously, and tislelizumab is given every three weeks at the dose of 200mg intravenously. Treatment efficacy will be performed by imaging and transurethral resection of tumors after the neoadjuvant treatment. Patients without disease progression will receive radical cystectomy or bladder-sparing therapies based on individual risk profiles and preferences. The primary endpoints are clinical complete remission rate (cCR, T0/Ta/Tis), pathological complete remission rate (pCR) and safety. The secondary endpoints are disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), local recurrence free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis free survival (DMFS) and quality of life. Results: Until now, 18 patients were included successfully, with 3 female patients and 15 male patients. And the median age was 64.47 years old. Of them, 7 patients were HER2(2+), and 11 patients were HER2(3+). The clinical stages were T2-4aN0-3M1a. Sixteen patients had the primary efficacy evaluation by now. After the neoadjuvant treatment, 7 patients were T0, 4 patients Tis, 2 patients partial response (PR), 2 patients stable disease (SD) and 1 patient suffered from progress of local disease. Hence the cCR rate was 68.75%, and the DCR was 90.91%. Fourteen patients chose radiotherapy as bladder-sparing therapy and no evidence of tumor in 6 patients who received treatment efficacy after radiotherapy. Two patients received radical cystectomy and pT3N0M0 was achieved for both. No patient died so far. For safety analysis, 4 patients suffered from immune-related adverse event, namely, grade 2 myositis, grade 1 elevated transaminase and grade 1 hyperthyroidism which led to treatment interruption of tislelizumab. And 10 patients experienced RC48-ADC related toxicities, including grade 1 elevated transaminase, grade 1 erythra and grade 1 paresthesia. No treatment related dose reduction happened. Conclusions: The novel neoadjuvant combination of RC48-ADC and tislelizumab showed promising down stage efficacy in patients with HER2 positive locally advanced MIBC and the toxicities were manageable, which would be verified by the final analysis. Clinical trial information: ChiECRCT20210564.

Preliminary results from a multi-center phase Ib/II study of RC48-ADC combined with tislelizumab as neoadjuvant treatment in patients with HER2 positive locally advanced muscle-invasive urothelial bladder cancer (Hope-03).

e16595 Background: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of RC48-ADC, a humanized anti-HER2 antibody conjugated with monomethyl auristatin E, and tislelizumab, a PD-1 antibody, as a novel neoadjuvant treatment combination in patients with HER2 positive locally advanced muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). The study design has been presented at 2022 ESMO Asia meeting. The preliminary results would be reported this time. Methods: This is a Ib/II, multi-center, open-label, single-arm study (ChiECRCT20210564). 51 patients with pathological and imaging diagnosed cT2-4bN0-3M0-1a HER2 positive MIBC will be included. RC48-ADC is given every 2 weeks with a maximum dose of 120mg intravenously, and tislelizumab is given every three weeks at the dose of 200mg intravenously. Treatment efficacy will be performed by imaging and transurethral resection of tumors after the neoadjuvant treatment. Patients without disease progression will receive radical cystectomy or bladder-sparing therapies based on individual risk profiles and preferences. The primary endpoints are clinical complete remission rate (cCR, T0/Ta/Tis), pathological complete remission rate (pCR) and safety. The secondary endpoints are disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), local recurrence free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis free survival (DMFS) and quality of life. Results: Until now, 18 patients were included successfully, with 3 female patients and 15 male patients. And the median age was 64.47 years old. Of them, 7 patients were HER2(2+), and 11 patients were HER2(3+). The clinical stages were T2-4aN0-3M1a. Sixteen patients had the primary efficacy evaluation by now. After the neoadjuvant treatment, 7 patients were T0, 4 patients Tis, 2 patients partial response (PR), 2 patients stable disease (SD) and 1 patient suffered from progress of local disease. Hence the cCR rate was 68.75%, and the DCR was 90.91%. Fourteen patients chose radiotherapy as bladder-sparing therapy and no evidence of tumor in 6 patients who received treatment efficacy after radiotherapy. Two patients received radical cystectomy and pT3N0M0 was achieved for both. No patient died so far. For safety analysis, 4 patients suffered from immune-related adverse event, namely, grade 2 myositis, grade 1 elevated transaminase and grade 1 hyperthyroidism which led to treatment interruption of tislelizumab. And 10 patients experienced RC48-ADC related toxicities, including grade 1 elevated transaminase, grade 1 erythra and grade 1 paresthesia. No treatment related dose reduction happened. Conclusions: The novel neoadjuvant combination of RC48-ADC and tislelizumab showed promising down stage efficacy in patients with HER2 positive locally advanced MIBC and the toxicities were manageable, which would be verified by the final analysis. Clinical trial information: ChiECRCT20210564.

Evolution of neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer regimens over 12 years and pathologic response rates according to tumor subtypes and clinical stage: A single-center retrospective study.

Given the evolution of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) for breast cancer, this study aimed to analyze trends in NAT regimens over time and patients' pathological responses, tumor stages, and subtypes. Data were analyzed for 548 patients with cT1-4N0-3M0 breast cancer who received NAT at Shandong Cancer Hospital between 2011 and 2022. The 12-year study period was divided into six 2-year periods termed P1 to P6. From P1 to P6, the proportion of stage II patients treated with NAT increased from 6.4% to 33.8% compared with same-stage operable breast cancer (r = 0.228, P < 0.001), while the proportion of the full-course group increased from 50.0% to 99.0% (r = 0.354, P < 0.001). The pathologic complete remission (pCR) rate in the full-course group increased from 30.8% to 54.6% (r = 0.248, P < 0.001). In the full-course human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 positive (HER2+) group, the proportion of chemotherapy combined with inhibition therapy increased from 33.3% to 100% (r = 0.530, P < 0.001). Furthermore, dual inhibition therapy increased from 0 to 98.9%. The proportion of the nonanthracycline group (dual inhibition) increased from 56.0% at P5 to 76.6% at P6 (r = 0.190, P = 0.042). In the full-course Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) group, the proportion of platinum therapy increased from 0 to 41.9% (r = 0.324, P < 0.001) and immune drugs increased from 0 to 53.2% (r = 0.500, P < 0.001). Overall, the results indicate an increasing proportion of patients receiving NAT therapy over time. Furthermore, there were increases in HER2 + patients receiving inhibition therapy (especially dual inhibition) and TNBC patients receiving platinum and immune therapy as part of NAT. Notably, these changes were associated with improved outcomes.

RC48-ADC combined with tislelizumab as neoadjuvant treatment in patients with HER2-positive locally advanced muscle-invasive urothelial bladder cancer: a multi-center phase Ib/II study (HOPE-03).

Bladder cancer with high expression of human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) is related to pathological malignancy and poor prognosis. The standard care for muscle-invasive urothelial bladder cancer (MIBC) is neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by radical cystectomy (RC) with pelvic lymph node dissection. For HER2-positive MIBC, the efficacy of cisplatin-based NAC is unsatisfactory, and adverse reactions are inevitable or even intolerable. New regimens with higher efficiency and lower toxicity need to be explored in the neoadjuvant setting for this population. HOPE-03 is a multi-center, open-label, single-arm, phase Ib/II study aiming to evaluate the safety and efficacy of RC48-ADC (disitamab vedotin (DV)), a humanized anti-HER2 antibody conjugated with monomethyl auristatin E, and tislelizumab (PD-1 antibody) as a novel neoadjuvant treatment combination in patients with HER2-positive locally advanced urothelial MIBC. Fifty-one patients with cT2-4bN0-3M0-1a pathology- and imaging-diagnosed HER2 positive (immunohistochemistry status 3+ or 2+ or 1+) MIBC were recruited. Of these patients, six were enrolled in the dose-escalation phase (three patients in the RC48-ADC 1.5 mg/kg group and three patients in the 2.0 mg/kg group), and 45 patients were enrolled in the phase II study (the expected recommended phase II dose for RC48-ADC was 2.0 mg/kg). Patients without disease progression received radical cystectomy or bladder-sparing therapies as their preference after neoadjuvant treatment. The primary endpoints were clinical complete remission rate (cCR rate; T0/Ta/Tis), pathological complete remission rate (pCR rate), and safety. The secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and quality of life. The HOPE-03 trial provides a description of the safety profile of RC-48 and tislelizumab combination in the neoadjuvant treatment of HER2-positive locally advanced urothelial MIBC, and the efficacy is explored as well in this population. https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=137111, identifier ChiCTR2200060153.

Addition of immune checkpoint inhibitors to chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in patients with triple-negative breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a relatively common malignant tumor with high mortality rates. There are limited treatment options and current therapy regimens often fall short of providing positive outcomes. The development of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have provided a vital treatment option although efficacy has varied. Here, we review patient response to current TNBC treatment with and without the addition of ICIs. A systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane, and EMBASE library databases was done to search eligible studies published from their inception through April 3, 2022. The primary outcome indicators used were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), pathological complete response rate (pCR) and objective remission rate (ORR), while adverse events (AEs) were also analyzed. Publication bias and sensitivity analyses and were performed to evaluate the quality of assessment. Overall, the meta-analysis looked at seven randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that included 4631 patients with TNBC. Results showed an improvement in PFS for patients receiving ICI in addition to chemotherapy (CT) in both the intent-to-treat (ITT) population and PD-L1 positive patients. Increased pCR rates were observed in all patients irrespective of PD-L1 status as well as increased ORR in the ITT which was more notable in PD-L1 positive subjects. While significant improvement in OS was observed only in PD-L1 positive individuals, the use of ICIs plus CT resulted in severe adverse reactions, specifically immune-related. This study supports the increased efficacy of ICIs in combination with CT compared to CT alone in patients with TNBC, with the most notable benefit observed in PD-L1 positive patients. However, combination therapy increases the risk of adverse reactions which warrants further investigation.

Selection of breast cancer subtypes to improve benefits of intensive dose‑dense chemotherapy: A systematic meta‑analysis.

Breast cancer (BC) is the most commonly diagnosed cancer and the second leading cause of cancer mortality among women worldwide. A large number of patients experience recurrence and BC-associated mortality following adjuvant chemotherapy. The present study aimed to determine the most suitable pathological subtype of BC to benefit from intensive dose-dense (DD) chemotherapy. A total of four electronic databases were searched from inception up to March 10, 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and retrospective studies comparing DD chemotherapy with standard chemotherapy in patients with BC were included. Pairwise random effects and network meta-analyses were performed to summarize efficacy and safety outcomes. A total of 27 original studies including 27,580 patients with BC were included. In terms of efficacy, the present study evaluated overall survival, disease-free survival, event-free survival, recurrence-free survival, pathological complete response and objective remission rate. Significant differences were identified in overall, hormone receptor+ (HR+) and HR- subgroups. Furthermore, from the network analysis, the HR+ and Her2- subgroups had the highest ranking, and these findings suggested that HR+/Her2- patients with BC should adhere to a treatment strategy including intensive DD chemotherapy, which is also characterized by an acceptable safety profile. In conclusion, patients with HR+ and Her2- BC were revealed to be the most suitable pathological type and are most likely to benefit from intense DD chemotherapy. The present study was registered with PROSPERO, CRD2022420351567.

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy with Chemotherapy versus Chemotherapy Alone in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Propensity Score and Inverse Probability Treatment Weighting Analysis.

This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) and neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy (NICT) combined with radical lung cancer resection for the treatment of patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). To adjust for confounding factors, we innovatively adopted two matching methods: propensity score (PS) and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). We conducted a retrospective analysis of the clinicopathological features and prognosis of patients with resectable NSCLC treated with NCT or NICT combined with radical lung cancer resection using propensity score matching (PSM) at a ratio of 1:1 and IPTW to balance potential bias. After PSM, 116 pairs of patients who had undergone NCT or NICT were selected for the final analysis. The pathological complete remission (pCR) and major pathological remission (MPR) rates were significantly better in the NICT group than in the NCT group (pCR rate of 44.8% vs 2.6%, P< 0.001; MPR rate of 66.4% vs 20.7%, P< 0.001). No significant difference was seen between the NICT and NCT groups in terms of postoperative complications (12.1% vs 9.5%, P=0.182). Patients in the NICT group had significantly better disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival(OS) than those in the NCT group ([3-year DFS: 75.2% vs 43.3%, P< 0.001] and [3-year OS: 91.5% vs 58.0%, P< 0.001]). Among all patients, those with postoperative pathology of pCR had better DFS (P< 0.001) and OS (P= 0.009). Patients with postoperative pathology of MPR had better DFS (P< 0.001) and OS (P< 0.001). The IPTW method yielded similar pathologic and prognostic results. Patients with resectable NSCLC treated with NICT had better pathological responses and prognosis, than those treated with NCT, and the safety profiles of NICT and NCT were similar.

Can neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy combined with immunotherapy benefit patients with microsatellite stable locally advanced rectal cancer? a pooled and integration analysis.

To assess the clinical efficacy of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy combined with immunotherapy for patients with microsatellite stable (MSS) locally advanced rectal cancer and provide evidence to support clinical decision-making. A systematic search was conducted on the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Collaboration databases, conference summaries, and Chinese databases for clinical studies that investigated neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy combined with immunotherapy for the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer with MSS status. The search spanned from the inception of each database through July 2023. Data from the identified studies were extracted using a pre-designed table, and efficacy outcomes were analyzed. An integrated analysis was conducted using Stata 12.0 software. Eight studies were included, comprising 204 patients with locally advanced MSS rectal cancer who received chemoradiotherapy combined with immunotherapy. The integrated analysis revealed a pathologic complete remission rate of 0.33, a sphincter preservation rate of 0.86, an R0 resection rate of 0.83, a major pathologic remission rate of 0.33, and a clinical complete remission rate of 0.30. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy combined with immunotherapy demonstrates significant short-term efficacy in MSS-type locally advanced rectal cancer, notably enhancing the pathologic complete remission and sphincter preservation rates. This combination is a recommended treatment for patients with MSS-type rectal cancer.

Safety and efficacy of tislelizumab plus chemotherapy as preoperative treatment in potentially resectable locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients.

Locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) requires more preoperative regiments in the era of immunotherapy. Tislelizumab was approved for first-line treatment for advanced lung cancer, bringing hope for preoperative therapy in LA-NSCLC. The aim of this study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of preoperative tislelizumab plus chemotherapy in LA-NSCLC. The medical records at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University were examined retrospectively from September 2019 to June 2022 for this descriptive single-arm cohort study. Patients with LA-NSCLC were treated with tislelizumab plus platinum-based dual-drug regimens for 2-6 cycles and regular imaging assessments were performed every 1-2 cycles. Data including demographic characteristics, clinicopathological staging, adverse events and surgery-related details were recorded in specifically designed forms. Forty patients met the inclusion criteria of the study and 23 patients underwent curative intent surgeries. Significantly clinical and pathological downstaging was observed, with the objective response rate being 65.00%, leading to a major pathological remission (MPR) rate of 56.52% and a pathological complete remission (pCR) rate of 34.78%. Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 4 patients and no perioperative death occurred. The 1-year progress-free survival rate and the 1-year overall survival rate were 85.0% and 90.0%, respectively. Tislelizumab plus chemotherapy as preoperative therapy demonstrates promising antitumour activity for potentially resectable LA-NSCLC with high MPR, pCR and acceptable toxicity and survival.

325. CAMRELIZUMAB IN COMBINATION WITH CHEMOTHERAPY VERSUS CHEMORADIOTHERAPY FOR THE CONVERSION OF UNRESECTABLE ESOPHAGEAL CARCINOMA: A PROSPECTIVE CLINICAL STUDY PROTOCOL

Abstract Background Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by esophagectomy is the standard of care for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, approximately 30% of patients still develop distant metastases and have a high incidence of treatment-related adverse events. Immunotherapy, as a new modality for anti-cancer treatment, has shown promising clinical benefits for patients with ESCC. The synergistic effects of immunotherapy and radiotherapy make their combination promising as neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced ESCC. Methods All participants who meet the inclusion criteria will be enrolled after signing the informed consent form. Patients with thoracic segment esophageal cancer with clinical stage T2–3 N0 M0 or T2–3 N+ M0 will be included. They will be treated with radical surgery within 4–8 weeks after the completion of two cycles of neoadjuvant radiotherapy in combination with camrelizumab according to the study schedule. The primary endpoint is the major pathological remission rate of all per-protocol patients. The secondary endpoints are the R0 resection rate, pathological complete remission rate, and adverse events. The interim analysis will be conducted after half of the planned number of patients have been enrolled. The trials will be terminated when more than two treatment-related deaths occur or fewer than five patients have major pathological remission. Discussion We designed this prospective single-arm phase II clinical study to evaluate the combination of camrelizumab and standard radiotherapy as preoperative neoadjuvant therapy for patients with resectable ESCC as part of the quest for better treatment options for patients with locally advanced ESCC. Trial registration: This trial protocol has been registered on NIH Clinical Trials database (www.clinicaltrials.gov/, NCT05176002). The posted information will be updated as needed to reflect protocol amendments and study progress.

Clinical characteristics and pathologic complete response (pCR) rate after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in postpartum women with breast cancer

PurposeBreast cancer (BC) is currently the leading cause of death in women worldwide. Studies have confirmed that pregnancy is an independent factor affecting the survival of BC patients. BC found during pregnancy, lactation, or shortly after delivery is what we used to think of as pregnancy-associated breast cancer (PABC). The current expert definition of this concept is not uniform; however, there is growing evidence that postpartum breast cancer (PPBC) differs from other types of BC in terms of both biological features and prognosis, with a slightly different focus on diagnosis and treatment. With the increase of female reproductive age population and changes in fertility policies in China, patients with PPBC are receiving increasing attention. Here, we systematically analyzed the clinicopathological characteristics and chemotherapeutic response of patients with PPBC. We retrospectively analyzed the clinicopathological data, molecular subtypes, chemotherapy regimens, and pathological complete remission (pCR) rates of 1343 patients with non-metastatic BC at Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital from January 1, 2012 to May 31, 2023. The categorical data were compared by chi-square test and Fisher exact test using logistic regression model. Predictor variables with P < 0.05 in the univariate analysis were included in the multivariate regression analysis to investigate the relationship between different age groups and pCR.ResultsA total of 714 patients were eligible for analysis in this study, and 667 patients had a history of pregnancy, 40 (5.6%) of whom were PPBC patients. When diagnosed with BC, patients with PPBC were younger, more likely to undergo breast-conserving surgery (BCS), and more likely to achieve pCR (P < 0.05). In molecular typing, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2)-positive and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) were more frequent. In the entire cohort, HER-2 expression and delivery status were independent predictors of pCR rates in BC patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).ConclusionOur findings suggest that postpartum status is an independent predictor of pCR attainment in BC patients. PPBC is more sensitive to chemotherapy than other patients.We need to pay more attention to this group and achieve individualized treatment, which will help us treat BC better and provide new targets and blueprints for our clinical therapy.

Comparison of Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy Plus Chemotherapy versus Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Patients with Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Propensity Score Matching Study.

This study compares the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy (NICT) and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) combined with radical esophagectomy in patients with resectable, locally advanced esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC). Patients with locally advanced ESCC treated with NICT or NCRT combined with esophagectomy between March 2016 and May 2022 were retrospectively analyzed and propensity score matched (PSM) in a 1:2 ratio to balance potential bias. After PSM, 110 patients who received NCRT and 55 patients who received NICT were selected for the final analysis. The probability of tumor regression grade 0 and the rate of pathological complete remission (pCR) were significantly higher in the NCRT group than in the NICT group (57.3% vs 32.7%, P=0.003 and 48.2% vs 29.1%, P=0.030, respectively). The incidence of postoperative complications in the NCRT group was not significantly different from that in the NICT group (P=0.082). Patients in the NCRT group had significantly better disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) than those in the NICT group (12-month DFS rate: 94.3% vs 81.8%, P=0.006; 12-month OS rate: 100.0% vs 95.4%, P=0.032). However, the results of the 24-month follow-up showed that there was also a statistically significant difference in DFS between the two groups. Patients with postoperative pCR had a longer DFS (P< 0.001). Short-term follow-up results show that NCRT has a significantly better pathologic response and prognosis than NICT in the treatment of patients with locally advanced ESCC. NCRT and NICT have similar safety profiles.

Effects of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes on nonresponse rate of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with invasive breast cancer

High level of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) can predict the rate of total pathological complete remission (tpCR) of breast cancer patients who receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). This study focused on evaluating the data of patients whose primary tumor and/or lymph node metastasis show nonresponse (NR) to NACT, trying to provide a basis for the clinical decision which patients will develop NACT resistance. The study included breast cancers from 991 patients who received NACT. ROC curve analysis confirmed that TILs showed significant predictive value for NR of hormone receptor (HR)+HER2− and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Among HR+HER2− breast cancer, TILs ≥ 10% was an independent predictor for low NR rate. Furthermore, positive correlation of TILs with Ki67 index and Miller-Payne grade, and negative correlation with ER and PR H-scores were only identified in this subgroup. In TNBC, TILs ≥ 17.5% was an independent predictor for low NR rate. The predictive value of low TILs on NR may facilitate to screen patients with HR+HER2− or TNBC who may not benefit from NACT. HR+HER2− breast cancer with low levels of TILs should be carefully treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and other alternatives such as neoadjuvant endocrine therapy can be considered.

Lowering the bar for consideration of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in early-stage HER2-positive breast cancers.

e12534 Background: The use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has contributed to increased rates of disease-free survival (DFS) as well as overall survival in breast cancer patients, specifically those with HER2-positive disease. Stage 2 patients with HER2-positive disease including tumors &gt; 2cm as well as node positive disease receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy as per current NCCN guidelines. The aim of our study was to understand outcomes in patients with early breast cancer receiving chemotherapy. Methods: We extracted data on patients with initial clinical stages IA-IB breast cancer who had HER2-positive status on initial biopsy and received chemotherapy plus anti-HER2 therapy in the Henry Ford Health System between January 2016 to June 2020. Patients with T2 or above and/or node positive disease were excluded. Results: Of the 229 total patients that met eligibility criteria, 159 (71%) were white, 65 (28%) were African American. 99% were females. The median age at diagnosis was 61 years. Estrogen receptor positivity was noted in 85% (196/229) of the patients. NAC was given to 56 patients (24%) of which 26 (46%) were African American and 45 (80%) were hormone receptor positive. 5 (9%) patients achieved pathological complete remission (CR). Remaining 51 patients (91%) did not have pathological CR. Of these, 17 (33%) patients had the same stage at surgery after NAC and 34 (66%) were upstaged on final pathological evaluation. 21 patients with residual disease (41%) underwent treatment change in the form of either ado-trastuzumab emtasine (TDM-1) or additional radiation therapy or repeat surgery. Of note, 34 of the 51 patients were treated for residual disease after 2019 with TDM-1. 54 (95%) patients are alive currently. Of the 173 patients that received adjuvant chemotherapy (76%), 39 (23%) were African American and 150 (87%) had hormone receptor positive disease. 19 of these (11%) were upstaged at surgery compared to the initial biopsy requiring treatment change. 163 (94%) are alive currently with no disease recurrence. Conclusions: Our study results suggest that NAC is used in minority of breast cancer patients, especially with stages 1A and 1B. Pathological CR rate in our study population was low and majority of patients who got NAC as well as a small percent of those who received adjuvant chemotherapy had disease upstaged based on surgical pathology results. We believe that this could be because of inaccurate initial staging due to limitations of imaging techniques and our population being mostly hormone receptor positive. With approval of TDM-1 in patients with residual disease post NAC, we may be able to improve outcomes in terms of recurrences and survival in these patients. Thus, consideration of NAC for early stage HER2-positive breast cancers appears attractive and data like our study may support ongoing prospective clinical trials.

Neoadjuvant camrelizumab plus chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer (NACI study): A prospective, single-arm, phase II trial.

5520 Background: First-line treatments for locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) have limited efficacy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is an emerging approach, however, two-thirds of patients (pts) respond to it and pts without response benefit little. PD-1 inhibitors have shown promising role in recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of preoperative PD-1 inhibitor camrelizumab combined neoadjuvant therapy for LACC. Methods: The study is designed as a multicenter, open-label, single-arm, prospective phase II study. Pts are enrolled if they had previously untreated LACC (2018 FIGO staged IB3, IIA2 and IIB/IIIC1r (tumor size &gt; 4cm). Eligible pts will receive neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy (NACIT), defined as one cycle of cisplatin (75-80 mg/m2, iv) plus nab-paclitaxel (260 mg/m2, iv) NACT and subsequent two cycles of camrelizumab (200mg, iv) combined NACT. Either surgery or concurrent chemoradiotherapy are conducted according to the response as per the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR), and the secondary endpoints were pathological complete remission (pCR) rate, rate of postoperative adjuvant treatment, event-free survival, overall survival and safety. Results: From Dec 1, 2020 to Feb 1, 2023, 83 pts were enrolled, and 78 pts were evaluated for response. The ORR was 100% (95%CI, 95.38 to 100), with 14 (17.95%) complete response (CR) and 64 (82.05%) partial response. Regarding the pathological findings of 76 pts who underwent radical surgery, 30 (39.47% (95%CI, 28.44 to 51.35)) pts achieved pCR, while 17 (22.37%) needed postoperative adjuvant treatment as indicated in NCCN guideline, of who 14 had positive pelvic nodes, positive surgical margin, and/or positive parametrium and the other three met Sedlis criteria. RECIST CR was significantly associated with pCR ( P = 0.016). Pre-treatment PD-L1 expression (Combined Positive Score) was a predictive biomarker for RECIST CR ( P = 0.036) but not for pCR ( P = 0.078) in these evaluated patients. Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 35 (44.87%) pts during NACIT; the most common were lymphocytopia (25.64%), neutropenia (12.82%) and leucopenia (8.97%). Conclusions: NACIT for LACC demonstrated extremely high ORR and pCR rate with manageable toxicity profile, and greatly reduced the need of postoperative adjuvant therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT04516616 .

CRES3T: A single-arm confirmatory trial of S-1 plus cisplatin with concurrent radical-dose radiotherapy followed by surgery for superior sulcus tumor.

8514 Background: A multicenter, single-arm, confirmatory trial (CRES3T) was conducted to investigate the efficacy and safety of S-1 plus cisplatin and concurrent radical-dose thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) followed by surgery in patients with superior sulcus tumor (SST). To date, no clinical trials on radical-dose TRT in the induction setting for SST have been conducted. Methods: SST was defined as a tumor that directly invades the chest wall including the first rib or more cephalad, subclavian artery, or subclavian vein according to CT or MRI scans. Eligible patients were 20 to 75 years old and had pathologically proven non-small cell lung cancer, performance status of 0–1, and no history of prior treatment. The patients received induction therapy consisting of three cycles of S-1 plus cisplatin with concurrent TRT (66 Gy in 33 fractions) followed by surgery. S-1 was administered orally at 40 mg/m2 twice per day, on days 1–14 along with an intravenous infusion of cisplatin (60 mg/m2) on day 1. The treatment cycles were repeated every four weeks. The primary endpoint was the 3-year overall survival (OS) rate, and key secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) rate, objective response rate (ORR), pathological complete remission (pCR) rate, and toxicity. Results: Between June 2014 and March 2019, 61 patients registered and received induction therapy. Pathological diagnoses were 30 adenocarcinoma, 20 squamous cell carcinoma, and 11 others. Radiologically diagnosed tumor invasion sites were the chest wall (n=57), subclavian artery (n=18), and subclavian vein (n=10). One patient with distant metastasis that manifested after starting induction therapy was removed from this study. Forty-nine patients underwent lobectomy and resection of the involved sites. The complete resection rate was 98% (48/49). Median follow-up time was 54 months. The 3-year OS and PFS rates were 73% (95% CI: 60–83%) and 53% (95% CI: 40–65%), respectively. The ORR and pCR rate were 42% (25/60, 95% CI: 29–54%) and 33% (16/49, 95% CI: 20–46%), respectively. Grade (G) 3 or 4 toxicities during induction therapy included neutropenia (28%), anemia (13%), thrombocytopenia (5%), and hyponatremia (8%). Two (3%) cases of pneumonia resulted in death. G3 surgical complications such as supraventricular arrhythmia, chylothorax, pleural effusion, pneumonia, mediastinitis, wound infection, and arm neuropathy developed in one (2%) patient each. One (2%) cardiac arrest on postoperative day 3 resulted in death. Conclusions: CRES3T demonstrated that induction therapy using S-1 plus cisplatin and concurrent radical-dose TRT followed by surgery was safe and effective in treating SST. Therefore, this strategy is potentially a new standard treatment for SST. (UMIN: 000014386, jRCT: s031180401.). Clinical trial information: UMIN000014386 .

Efficacy and safety of camrelizumab combined with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone as preoperative neoadjuvant therapy for resectable locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: Preliminary results from a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled study.

4064 Background: Camrelizumab combined with chemotherapy has a very ideal therapeutic effect and low toxicity in the treatment of solid tumors. camrelizumab plays an important role in the treatment of locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Methods: This study is a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled study. Inclusion criteria were patients aged 18-75 years with an ECOG score of 0-1 who had not received other treatments previously and had histologically confirmed resectable locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (clinical stages cT1-4N1-3M0 and cT3-4N0M0). Patients received camrelizumab combined with chemotherapy (albumin paclitaxel + cisplatin in chemotherapy regimen) or chemotherapy alone (albumin paclitaxel + cisplatin in chemotherapy regimen). The primary endpoints are pathological complete remission (pCR) rate and 5-year overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints including disease-free survival rate, duration of drug treatment and adverse events and we attempt to explore the correlation between drug efficacy and PD-L1 expression. The target sample size was 400 and patients were divided into two groups according to a 1:1 ratio who were received camrelizumab plus chemotherapy and chemotherapy alone. Results: From January 2021 to October 2022, 243 patients with resectable locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma from four centers were enrolled. Of these, 205 (85.2%) were male and 38 (15.6%) were female. Median age was 65 years. Most patients (182, 74.9%) were in clinical stage III and had an ECOG score of 1 (185, 76.1%). 150 patients had completed all clinical trial cycles and the result showed that among 90 patients who received camrelizumab plus chemotherapy, 25 patients achieved pathological complete remission(pCR), 39 achieved major partial remission (MPR), 11 had stable disease and 1 had progressive disease, with a pCR rate of 27.8% and MPR rate of 43.3%. Among 60 patients who received chemotherapy alone, 6 patients achieved pCR, 13 patients achieved MPR, 19 patients had stable disease and 2 patients had progressive disease, with a pCR rate of 10.0% and MPR rate of 26.7%. The most common adverse events were reactive cutaneous capillary endothelial proliferation (72.1%), nausea (42%), and leukopenia (15.5%), all of which were in grade 1 – 2 with manageable safety. Conclusions: Preliminary results of this study showed that the overall efficacy of camrelizumab plus chemotherapy was better than that of chemotherapy alone and the drug was safe and reliable. In future work, we will continue to analyze the survival outcomes, drug safety and the relationship between drug efficacy and PD-L1 expression and other biomarkers. Clinical trial information: ChiCTR2000040330 .

Phase II trial of terelizumab combined with radiotherapy of locally advanced unresectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: TREC trial.

e16086 Background: Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is the standard therapy for locally advanced unresectable esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC)，However, some patients cannot tolerate or are unwilling to CCRT. The aim of this phase II trial was to assess the efficacy and safety of the tirelizumab combined with radiotherapy in patients of locally advanced unresectable ESCC. Methods: Key eligibility criteria were as follows: ESCC of clinical stage Ⅱ-Ⅳa; aged 18 to 90 years; cannot tolerate or are unwilling to CCRT; ECOG performance status 0 or 1; and performed radiotherapy: Involvement field irradiation, nodal GTV (GTVn) (regional lymphatic metastasis) radiotherapy dose 60Gy, the esophageal gross tumor volume (GTVt) radiotherapy dose 50Gy, if the gastroscope pathology is completely relieved, otherwise it is 60Gy. All patients registered before radiotherapy. The patient received concurrent therapy with tirelizumab (200mg every time, 3-week cycle), until the disease progresses or clinical benefits are lost (the longest time is 12 months). The primary endpoint was the esophageal gross tumor pathological complete remission rate (pCR). Results: Between 01 August 2021 and 31 December 2022, 31 patients were enrolled, and 27 completed radiotherapy and at least two times of tirelizumab treatment. Data cutoff date was 31 January 2023, median follow-up time among survivors after radiotherapy was 9 months (range 4-20). The esophageal gross tumor pCR rate was 66.7% (95% CI, 14.3%-52.3%) and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of low severity (grade 1-2, 48.1%; grade 3, 7.4%; grade 4-5, no). No treatment-related mortality occurred. Two (7.4%) patients had tumor recurrence and two (7.4%) patients died (Infection and heart disease). The 1-year PFS rate, median PFS and median OS had not been reached yet. For locally advanced unresectable ESCC that can't receive CCRT, the combination of tirelizumab and radiotherapy shows promising efficacy and acceptable toxicity, providing a feasible and effective choice. The research of long-term survival analysis is under way. Conclusions: Concurrent radiotherapy with tirelizumab shows promising efficacy and controllable safety for patients with locally advanced ESCC who are unable or unwilling to undergo CCRT, and warrants further evaluation in larger studies. Clinical trial information: ChiCTR2100053182 .

Efficacy analysis of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with or without anthracyclines in female patients with HER2-positive breast cancer in China: a nationwide, multicenter, 10-year retrospective study (CSBrS-012).

In the era of targeted therapy, whether patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer are exempted from anthracycline usage in the neoadjuvant setting is controversial. Our objective was to retrospectively analyze the differences in pathological complete remission (pCR) rates between the anthracycline group and the nonanthracycline group. The CSBrS-012 study (2010-2020) included female primary breast cancer patients with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) who underwent standard breast and axillary surgery post-NAC. A logistic proportional hazard model was applied to estimate the association of covariates with pCR. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance the differences in baseline characteristics, and subgroup analyses were performed using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test. A total of 2507 patients were enrolled: the anthracycline group (n = 1581, 63%) and the nonanthracycline group (n = 926, 37%). A pCR was recorded in 17.1% (271/1581) of patients in the anthracycline group and in 29.3% (271/926) in the nonanthracycline group, and the difference in the pCR rate between the two groups was statistically significant [odds ratio (OR) = 2.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.65-2.43); p < 0.001). In the subsequent subgroup analysis, substantial differences in pCR rates between the anthracycline and nonanthracycline groups were detected in the nontargeted [OR = 1.91, 95% CI (1.13-3.23); p = 0.015] and dual-HER2-targeted populations [OR = 0.55, 95% CI (0.33-0.92); p = 0.021) before PSM, whereas differences vanished after PSM. The pCR rates between the anthracycline and nonanthracycline groups did not differ for the single target population, either before or after PSM. In the presence of trastuzumab and/or pertuzumab, the pCR rate of patients with HER2-positive breast cancer receiving anthracycline was not superior to that of patients receiving nonanthracycline. Thus, our study further provides clinical evidence for exempting anthracycline treatment in HER2-positive breast cancer in the era of targeted therapy.