Pathogenesis Of Severe COVID-19 Research Articles

Natural Killer Cells Do Not Attenuate a Mouse-Adapted SARS-CoV-2-Induced Disease in Rag2-/- Mice.

This study investigates the roles of T, B, and Natural Killer (NK) cells in the pathogenesis of severe COVID-19, utilizing mouse-adapted SARS-CoV-2-MA30 (MA30). To evaluate this MA30 mouse model, we characterized MA30-infected C57BL/6 mice (B6) and compared them with SARS-CoV-2-WA1 (an original SARS-CoV-2 strain) infected K18-human ACE2 (K18-hACE2) mice. We found that the infected B6 mice developed severe peribronchial inflammation and rapid severe pulmonary edema, but less lung interstitial inflammation than the infected K18-hACE2 mice. These pathological findings recapitulate some pathological changes seen in severe COVID-19 patients. Using this MA30-infected mouse model, we further demonstrate that T and/or B cells are essential in mounting an effective immune response against SARS-CoV-2. This was evident as Rag2-/- showed heightened vulnerability to infection and inhibited viral clearance. Conversely, the depletion of NK cells did not significantly alter the disease course in Rag2-/- mice, underscoring the minimal role of NK cells in the acute phase of MA30-induced disease. Together, our results indicate that T and/or B cells, but not NK cells, mitigate MA30-induced disease in mice and the infected mouse model can be used for dissecting the pathogenesis and immunology of severe COVID-19.

Type 2 diabetes and its genetic susceptibility are associated with increased severity and mortality of COVID-19 in UK Biobank

Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is known as one of the important risk factors for the severity and mortality of COVID-19. Here, we evaluate the impact of T2D and its genetic susceptibility on the severity and mortality of COVID-19, using 459,119 individuals in UK Biobank. Utilizing the polygenic risk scores (PRS) for T2D, we identified a significant association between T2D or T2D PRS, and COVID-19 severity. We further discovered the efficacy of vaccination and the pivotal role of T2D-related genetics in the pathogenesis of severe COVID-19. Moreover, we found that individuals with T2D or those in the high T2D PRS group had a significantly increased mortality rate. We also observed that the mortality rate for SARS-CoV-2-infected patients was approximately 2 to 7 times higher than for those not infected, depending on the time of infection. These findings emphasize the potential of T2D PRS in estimating the severity and mortality of COVID-19.

SARS-CoV-2 primed platelets–derived microRNAs enhance NETs formation by extracellular vesicle transmission and TLR7/8 activation

BackgroundHyperactive neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) formation plays a key role in the pathogenesis of severe COVID-19. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are vehicles which carry cellular components for intercellular communication. The association between COVID-19 patients-derived EVs and NETs formation remains elusive.MethodsWe explored the roles of EVs in NETs formation from 40 COVID-19 patients with different disease severities as well as 30 healthy subjects. The EVs-carried microRNAs profile was analyzed using next generation sequencing approach which was validated by quantitative reverse transcription PCR. The regulatory mechanism of EVs on NETs formation was investigated by using an in vitro cell-based assay, including immunofluorescence assay, flow cytometry, and immunoblotting.ResultsCOVID-19 patient–derived EVs induced NETs formation by endocytosis uptake. SARS-CoV-2 spike protein-triggered NETs formation was significantly enhanced in the presence of platelet–derived EVs (pEVs) and this effect was Toll-like receptor (TLR) 7/8- and NADPH oxidase-dependent. Increased levels of miR-21/let-7b were revealed in EVs from COVID-19 patients and were associated with disease severity. We demonstrated that the spike protein activated platelets directly, followed by the subsequent intracellular miR-21/let-7b upregulation and then were loaded into pEVs. The pEVs-carried miR-21 interacted with TLR7/8 to prime p47phox phosphorylation in neutrophils, resulting in NADPH oxidase activation to promote ROS production and NETs enhancement. In addition, miR-21 modulates NF-κB activation and IL-1β/TNFα/IL-8 upregulation in neutrophils upon TLR7/8 engagement. The miR-21 inhibitor and TLR8 antagonist could suppress efficiently spike protein-induced NETs formation and pEVs primed NETs enhancement.ConclusionsWe identified SARS-CoV-2 triggered platelets–derived GU-enriched miRNAs (e.g., miR-21/let-7b) as a TLR7/8 ligand that could activate neutrophils through EVs transmission. The miR-21-TLR8 axis could be used as a potential predisposing factor or therapeutic target for severe COVID-19.

Circulating markers of extracellular matrix remodelling in severe COVID-19 patients.

Abnormal remodelling of the extracellular matrix (ECM) has generally been linked to pulmonary inflammation and fibrosis and may also play a role in the pathogenesis of severe COVID-19. To further elucidate the role of ECM remodelling and excessive fibrogenesis in severe COVID-19, we examined circulating levels of mediators involved in various aspects of these processes in COVID-19 patients. Serial blood samples were obtained from two cohorts of hospitalised COVID-19 patients (n=414). Circulating levels of ECM remodelling mediators were quantified by enzyme immunoassays in samples collected during hospitalisation and at 3-month follow-up. Samples were related to disease severity (respiratory failure and/or treatment at the intensive care unit), 60-day total mortality and pulmonary pathology after 3-months. We also evaluated the direct effect of inactivated SARS-CoV-2 on the release of the different ECM mediators in relevant cell lines. Several of the measured markers were associated with adverse outcomes, notably osteopontin (OPN), S100 calcium-binding protein A12 and YKL-40 were associated with disease severity and mortality. High levels of ECM mediators during hospitalisation were associated with computed tomography thorax pathology after 3-months. Some markers (i.e. growth differential factor 15, galectin 3 and matrix metalloproteinase 9) were released from various relevant cell lines (i.e. macrophages and lung cell lines) in vitro after exposure to inactivated SARS-CoV-2 suggesting a direct link between these mediators and the causal agent of COVID-19. Our findings highlight changes to ECM remodelling and particularly a possible role of OPN, S100A12 and YKL-40 in the pathogenesis of severe COVID-19.

Cell-intrinsic and -extrinsic effects of SARS-CoV-2 RNA on pathogenesis: single-cell meta-analysis.

Single-cell RNA-seq has been used to characterize human COVID-19. To determine if preclinical models successfully mimic the cell-intrinsic and -extrinsic effects of severe disease, we conducted a meta-analysis of single-cell data across five model species. To assess whether dissemination of viral RNA in lung cells tracks pathology and results in cell-intrinsic and -extrinsic transcriptomic changes in COVID-19. We conducted a meta-analysis by analyzing six publicly available, scRNA-seq data sets. We used dual mapping (host and virus) and differential gene expression analyses to compare viral+ and viral- cell populations. We conducted a principal component analysis to identify successful models of human COVID-19. We found expression of viral RNA in many non-epithelial cell types. Fibroblasts, macrophages, and endothelial cells exhibit clear evidence of viral-intrinsic and -extrinsic effects on host gene expression. Using viral RNA expression, we found that K18-hACE2 mice most closely modeled severe human COVID-19, followed by hamsters. Ferrets and macaques are poor models of human disease due to the low presence of viral RNA. Moreover, we found that increased transcripts of certain key inflammatory genes such as IL1B, IL18, and CXCL10 are not restricted to virally infected cells, suggesting these genes are regulated in a paracrine or autocrine fashion. These data affirm widespread dissemination of viral RNA in the lung, which may be key in the pathogenesis of severe COVID-19 and demonstrate ferrets and Rhesus macaques are poor models of human COVID-19. IMPORTANCE We conducted a high-resolution meta-analysis of scRNA-seq data from humans and five animal models of COVID-19. This study reports viral RNA dissemination in several cell types in human data as well as in some of the pre-clinical models. Using this metric, the K18-hACE2 mouse model, followed by the hamster model, most closely resembled human COVID-19. We observed clear evidence of viral-intrinsic effects within cells (e.g., IRF5 expression) as well as viral-extrinsic cytokine modulation (e.g., IL1B, IL18, CXCL10). We observed proinflammatory chemokine expression in cells devoid of viral RNA expression, suggesting autocrine/paracrine interferon regulation. This report serves as a resource-synthesizing data from COVID-19 humans and animal models and suggesting improvements for relevant pre-clinical models that may aid future diagnostic and therapeutic development projects.

Longitudinal whole blood transcriptomic analysis characterizes neutrophil activation and interferon signaling in moderate and severe COVID-19

A maladaptive inflammatory response has been implicated in the pathogenesis of severe COVID-19. This study aimed to characterize the temporal dynamics of this response and investigate whether severe disease is associated with distinct gene expression patterns. We performed microarray analysis of serial whole blood RNA samples from 17 patients with severe COVID-19, 15 patients with moderate disease and 11 healthy controls. All study subjects were unvaccinated. We assessed whole blood gene expression patterns by differential gene expression analysis, gene set enrichment, two clustering methods and estimated relative leukocyte abundance using CIBERSORT. Neutrophils, platelets, cytokine signaling, and the coagulation system were activated in COVID-19, and this broad immune activation was more pronounced in severe vs. moderate disease. We observed two different trajectories of neutrophil-associated genes, indicating the emergence of a more immature neutrophil phenotype over time. Interferon-associated genes were strongly enriched in early COVID-19 before falling markedly, with modest severity-associated differences in trajectory. In conclusion, COVID-19 necessitating hospitalization is associated with a broad inflammatory response, which is more pronounced in severe disease. Our data suggest a progressively more immature circulating neutrophil phenotype over time. Interferon signaling is enriched in COVID-19 but does not seem to drive severe disease.

Lipoprotein(a) Does Not Predict Thrombotic Events and In-Hospital Outcomes in Patients with COVID-19.

The prothrombotic and proinflammatory properties of lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) have been hypothesized to play a role in the pathogenesis of severe COVID-19; however, the prognostic impact of Lp(a) on the clinical course of COVID-19 remains controversial. This study aimed to investigate whether Lp(a) may be associated with biomarkers of thrombo-inflammation and the occurrence of thrombotic events or adverse clinical outcomes in patients hospitalized for COVID-19. We consecutively enrolled a cohort of patients hospitalized for COVID-19 and collected blood samples for Lp(a) assessment at hospital admission. A prothrombotic state was evaluated through D-dimer levels, whereas a proinflammatory state was evaluated through C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin, and white blood cell (WBC) levels. Thrombotic events were marked by the diagnosis of deep or superficial vein thrombosis (DVT or SVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA), acute coronary syndrome (ACS), and critical limb ischemia (CLI). The composite clinical end point of intensive care unit (ICU) admission/in-hospital death was used to evaluate adverse clinical outcomes. Among 564 patients (290 (51%) men, mean age of 74 ± 17 years) the median Lp(a) value at hospital admission was 13 (10-27) mg/dL. During hospitalization, 64 (11%) patients were diagnosed with at least one thrombotic event and 83 (15%) patients met the composite clinical end point. Lp(a), as either a continuous or categorical variable, was not associated with D-dimer, CRP, procalcitonin, and WBC levels (p > 0.05 for all correlation analyses). In addition, Lp(a) was not associated with a risk of thrombotic events (p > 0.05 for multi-adjusted odds ratios) nor with a risk of adverse clinical outcomes (p > 0.05 for multi-adjusted hazard ratios). In conclusion, Lp(a) does not influence biomarkers of plasma thrombotic activity and systemic inflammation nor has any impact on thrombotic events and adverse clinical outcomes in patients hospitalized for COVID-19.

Targeted capture enrichment and sequencing identifies HLA variants associated with the severity of COVID-19.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is currently a global pandemic. The pathogenesis of severe COVID-19 has been widely investigated, but it is still unclear. Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) plays a central role in immune response, and its variants might be related to COVID-19 progression and severity. To investigate the hypothesis that individual HLA variations could alter the course of COVID-19 and might be associated with the severity of COVID-19. In this study, we conducted an HLA targeted capture enrichment and sequencing of severe COVID-19 patients matched to mild cases. A total of 16 COVID-19 patients, confirmed by SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA polymerase-chain-reaction (PCR) test and chest computed tomography (CT) scan, were enrolled in this study. The HLA targeted capture enrichment and sequencing were conducted. HLA typing was performed by comparing contigs with IPD-IMGT/HLA Database. In this study, 139 four-digit resolution HLA alleles were acquired. The results showed that HLA-DRB3*01:01 allele was significantly associated with the severity of COVID-19 (odds ratio [OR] = 27.64, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.35-560.50, P = 0.0064). And HLA-K*01:01 might be a potential risk factor for COVID-19 severity (OR = 0.11, 95% CI = 0.017-0.66, P = 0.019), but HLA-K*01:02 might be a protective factor (OR = 7.50, 95% CI = 1.48-37.92, P = 0.019). Three non-classical HLA alleles, including HLA-DRB3*01:01, HLA-K*01:01, HLA-K*01:02 were identified to be associated with the severity of COVID-19 by comparing mild and severe patients. The current findings would be helpful for exploring the influence of HLA gene polymorphisms on the development and severity of COVID-19.

Molecular Mimicry between SARS-CoV-2 and Human Endocrinocytes: A Prerequisite of Post-COVID-19 Endocrine Autoimmunity?

Molecular mimicry between human and microbial/viral/parasite peptides is common and has long been associated with the etiology of autoimmune disorders provoked by exogenous pathogens. A growing body of evidence accumulated in recent years suggests a strong correlation between SARS-CoV-2 infection and autoimmunity. The article analyzes the immunogenic potential of the peptides shared between the SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein (S-protein) and antigens of human endocrinocytes involved in most common autoimmune endocrinopathies. A total of 14 pentapeptides shared by the SARS-CoV-2 S-protein, thyroid, pituitary, adrenal cortex autoantigens and beta-cells of the islets of Langerhans were identified, all of them belong to the immunoreactive epitopes of SARS-CoV-2. The discussion of the findings relates the results to the clinical correlates of COVID-19-associated autoimmune endocrinopathies. The most common of these illnesses is an autoimmune thyroid disease, so the majority of shared pentapeptides belong to the marker autoantigens of this disease. The most important in pathogenesis of severe COVID-19, according to the authors, may be autoimmunity against adrenals because their adequate response prevents excessive systemic action of the inflammatory mediators causing cytokine storm and hemodynamic shock. A critique of the antigenic mimicry concept is given with an assertion that peptide sharing is not a guarantee but only a prerequisite for provoking autoimmunity based on the molecular mimicry. The latter event occurs in carriers of certain HLA haplotypes and when a shared peptide is only used in antigen processing

Multiomic analysis reveals cell-type-specific molecular determinants of COVID-19 severity.

The determinants of severe COVID-19 in healthy adults are poorly understood, which limits the opportunity for early intervention. We present a multiomic analysis using machine learning to characterize the genomic basis of COVID-19 severity. We use single-cell multiome profiling of human lungs to link genetic signals to cell-type-specific functions. We discover >1,000 risk genes across 19 cell types, which account for 77% of the SNP-based heritability for severe disease. Genetic risk is particularly focused within natural killer (NK) cells and T cells, placing the dysfunction of these cells upstream of severe disease. Mendelian randomization and single-cell profiling of human NK cells support the role of NK cells and further localize genetic risk to CD56bright NK cells, which are key cytokine producers during the innate immune response. Rare variant analysis confirms the enrichment of severe-disease-associated genetic variation within NK-cell risk genes. Our study provides insights into the pathogenesis of severe COVID-19 with potential therapeutic targets.

Impairment of neutrophil functions and homeostasis in COVID-19 patients: association with disease severity

BackgroundA dysregulated immune response is emerging as a key feature of critical illness in COVID-19. Neutrophils are key components of early innate immunity that, if not tightly regulated, contribute to uncontrolled systemic inflammation. We sought to decipher the role of neutrophil phenotypes, functions, and homeostasis in COVID-19 disease severity and outcome.MethodsBy using flow cytometry, this longitudinal study compares peripheral whole-blood neutrophils from 90 COVID-19 ICU patients with those of 22 SARS-CoV-2-negative patients hospitalized for severe community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and 38 healthy controls. We also assessed correlations between these phenotypic and functional indicators and markers of endothelial damage as well as disease severity.ResultsAt ICU admission, the circulating neutrophils of the COVID-19 patients showed continuous basal hyperactivation not seen in CAP patients, associated with higher circulating levels of soluble E- and P-selectin, which reflect platelet and endothelial activation. Furthermore, COVID-19 patients had expanded aged-angiogenic and reverse transmigrated neutrophil subsets—both involved in endothelial dysfunction and vascular inflammation. Simultaneously, COVID-19 patients had significantly lower levels of neutrophil oxidative burst in response to bacterial formyl peptide. Moreover patients dying of COVID-19 had significantly higher expansion of aged-angiogenic neutrophil subset and greater impairment of oxidative burst response than survivors.ConclusionsThese data suggest that neutrophil exhaustion may be involved in the pathogenesis of severe COVID-19 and identify angiogenic neutrophils as a potentially harmful subset involved in fatal outcome.Graphic

Heterologous Immune Responses of Serum IgG and Secretory IgA Against the Spike Protein of Endemic Coronaviruses During Severe COVID-19

Defining immune correlates of disease severity is important to better understand the immunopathogenesis in COVID-19. Here we made use of a protein microarray platform to detect IgG- and IgA-reactive antibodies in sera and saliva respectively, and assess cross-reactivity between SARS-CoV-2 and endemic coronaviruses (eCoVs). IgG responses against the full protein of spike, but not the S1 subunit, were significantly higher in convalescent sera of patients with severe disease compared to mild disease and healthy controls. In addition, we detected reactivity of secretory IgA to eCoVs in saliva of patients with severe disease, not present in patients with moderate disease or seropositive healthy controls. These heterologous immune responses are in line with non-protective cross-reactivity, and support a potential role for immune imprinting in the pathogenesis of severe COVID-19.

Low Levels of Granulocytic Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells May Be a Good Marker of Survival in the Follow-Up of Patients With Severe COVID-19.

Infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) causes a disease (coronavirus disease 2019, COVID-19) that may develop into a systemic disease with immunosuppression and death in its severe form. Myeloid-derived suppressive cells (MDSCs) are inhibitory cells that contribute to immunosuppression in patients with cancer and infection. Increased levels of MDSCs have been found in COVID-19 patients, although their role in the pathogenesis of severe COVID-19 has not been clarified. For this reason, we raised the question whether MDSCs could be useful in the follow-up of patients with severe COVID-19 in the intensive care unit (ICU). Thus, we monitored the immunological cells, including MDSCs, in 80 patients admitted into the ICU. After 1, 2, and 3 weeks, we examined for a possible association with mortality (40 patients). Although the basal levels of circulating MDSCs did not discriminate between the two groups of patients, the last measurement before the endpoint (death or ICU discharge) showed that patients discharged alive from the ICU had lower levels of granulocytic MDSCs (G-MDSCs), higher levels of activated lymphocytes, and lower levels of exhausted lymphocytes compared with patients who had a bad evolution (death). In conclusion, a steady increase of G-MDSCs during the follow-up of patients with severe COVID-19 was found in those who eventually died.

Clinical Management of COVID-19 in Cancer Patients with the STAT3 Inhibitor Silibinin

COVID-19 pathophysiology is caused by a cascade of respiratory and multiorgan failures arising, at least in part, from the SARS-CoV-2-driven dysregulation of the master transcriptional factor STAT3. Pharmacological correction of STAT3 over-stimulation, which is at the root of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and coagulopathy/thrombosis events, should be considered for treatment of severe COVID-19. In this perspective, we first review the current body of knowledge on the role of STAT3 in the pathogenesis of severe COVID-19. We then exemplify the potential clinical value of treating COVID-19 disease with STAT3 inhibitors by presenting the outcomes of two hospitalized patients with active cancer and COVID-19 receiving oral Legalon®—a nutraceutical containing the naturally occurring STAT3 inhibitor silibinin. Both patients, which were recruited to the clinical trial SIL-COVID19 (EudraCT number: 2020-001794-77) had SARS-CoV-2 bilateral interstitial pneumonia and a high COVID-GRAM score, and showed systemic proinflammatory responses in terms of lymphocytopenia and hypoalbuminemia. Both patients were predicted to be at high risk of critical COVID-19 illness in terms of intensive care unit admission, invasive ventilation, or death. In addition to physician’s choice of best available therapy or supportive care, patients received 1050 mg/day Legalon® for 10 days without side-effects. Silibinin-treated cancer/COVID-19+ patients required only minimal oxygen support (2–4 L/min) during the episode, exhibited a sharp decline of the STAT3-regulated C-reactive protein, and demonstrated complete resolution of the pulmonary lesions. These findings might inspire future research to advance our knowledge and improve silibinin-based clinical interventions aimed to target STAT3-driven COVID-19 pathophysiology.

COVID-19 and Sepsis

The COVID-19 pandemic has created a major alteration in the medical literature including the sepsis discussion. From the outset of the pandemic, various reports have indicated that although there are some unique features pertinent to COVID-19, many of its acute manifestations are similar to sepsis caused by other pathogens. As a consequence, the old definitions now require consideration of this new etiologic agent, namely SARS-CoV-2. Although the pathogenesis of COVID-19 has not been fully explained, the data obtained so far in hospitalized patients has revealed that serum cytokine and chemokine levels are high in severe COVID-19 patients, similar to those found with sepsis. COVID-19 may involve multiple organ systems. In addition to the lungs, the virus has been isolated from blood, urine, faeces, liver, and gallbladder. Results from autopsy series in COVID-19 patients have demonstrated a wide range of findings, including vascular involvement, congestion, consolidation, and hemorrhage as well as diffuse alveolar damage in lung tissue consistent with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The presence of viral cytopathic-like changes, infiltration of inflammatory cells (mononuclear cells and macrophages), and viral particles in histopathological samples are considered a consequence of both direct viral infection and immune hyperactivation. Thromboembolism and hyper-coagulopathy are other components in the pathogenesis of severe COVID-19. Although the pathogenesis of hypercoagulability is not fully understood, it has been pointed out that all three components of Virchow’s triad (endothelial injury, stasis, and hypercoagulable state) play a major role in contributing to clot formation in severe COVID-19 infection. In severe COVID-19 cases, laboratory parameters such as hematological findings, coagulation tests, liver function tests, D-dimer, ferritin, and acute phase reactants such as CRP show marked alterations, which are suggestive of a cytokine storm. Another key element of COVID-19 pathogenesis in severe cases is its similarity or association with hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH). SARS-CoV-2 induced cytokine storm has significant clinical and laboratory findings overlapping with HLH. Viral sepsis has some similarities but also some differences when compared to bacterial sepsis. In bacterial sepsis, systemic inflammation affecting multiple organs is more dominant than in COVID-19 sepsis. While bacterial sepsis causes an early and sudden onset clinical deterioration, viral diseases may exhibit a relatively late onset and chronic course. Consideration of severe COVID-19 disease as a sepsis syndrome has relevance and may assist in terms of determining treatments that will modulate the immune response, limit intrinsic damage to tissue and organs, and potentially improve outcome.

Complement inhibition in severe COVID-19 - Blocking C5a seems to be key.

With great interest we read the report by Annane and colleagues describing the effect of blocking complement factor C5 with the antibody eculizumab in patients with severe COVID-19 [1]. Results of this non-controlled study show an important proof of principle of complement inhibition therapy in patients with severe COVID-19. Increasing evidence point towards a critical role of the proinflammatory anaphylatoxin C5a in the pathogenesis of severe COVID-19 [2–4]. A previous study showed that controlling the anaphylatoxin C5a in disease requires a specifically targeted inhibition [5].

Tenofovir-based PrEP for COVID-19: an untapped opportunity?

Early in the pandemic, when the Centers for Disease Control identified possible risk factors for COVID-19, it was rational to include HIV due to concerns that an impaired immune response could lead to severe infection. As the data bore out over time, however, there was little evidence that HIV increased COVID-19 risk in settings with good access to antiretroviral therapy (ART) [1]. Furthermore, observational studies of people with HIV (PWH) and in-vitro studies yielded intriguing results around the potential activity of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) against COVID-19. TDF in combination with emtricitabine (FTC), TDF/FTC (Truvada®), is used worldwide for HIV treatment and pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). The first signal came in June, with publication of a Spanish cohort study of 77 590 PWH taking ART [1]. The incidence per 10 000 persons of COVID-19 diagnosis among people taking TDF/FTC was 16.9 (95% confidence interval, CI, 10.5–25.9), compared to 28.3–39.1 for those on other antiviral regimens and 41.7 in the general population. Risks of hospital admission and death from COVID-19 were both similarly reduced, although channeling bias (with healthier patients prescribed TDF/FTC) could not be ruled out. Participants taking a formulation of tenofovir that is safer in renal disease—tenofovir alafenamide (TAF)—fared no better than the general population, supporting the possibility of confounding. However, TDF also leads to approximately 10-fold higher extracellular tenofovir concentrations than TAF, corresponding to greater penetration into some mucosal tissues [2] and possibly stronger immunomodulatory effects [1,3]. While this finding was provocative, it was the pattern that emerged from other cohort studies that caught the interest of the HIV research community. In a cohort of 3.5 million people (16% HIV positive) in the Western Cape, South Africa, PWH taking TDF/FTC who contracted SARS-CoV-2 experienced 59% lower mortality from COVID-19 than those taking abacavir or zidovudine (aHR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.21–0.78) [4]. In this case, without TAF/FTC availability, channeling bias was likely not a factor. A third cohort of 750 men who have sex with men and transgender women found that PrEP users who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies showed higher rates of asymptomatic infection (42.7% of PrEP users vs. 21.7% of non-PrEP users; P = 0.07) [5]. This mild outcome occurred despite PrEP users having a higher seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 than those not on PrEP (15.0% vs. 9.2%); this might be due to greater social contact among people using PrEP during the pandemic. What could explain these observations? In-vitro and molecular docking studies suggest that tenofovir inhibits RNA-dependent RNA polymerase of SARS-CoV-2, although with weaker binding than remdesivir, which did not improve clinical outcomes in the WHO SOLIDARITY trial, and showed faster time to recovery, but not improved survival in ACTT-1 [6–9]. TDF also has immunomodulatory effects, including decreased production of interleukin (IL)-8 and IL-10 [3]. Both IL-8 and IL-10 have been shown to predict COVID-19 severity [10] and IL-10 may play a detrimental role in the pathogenesis of severe COVID-19 [11]. Other drugs targeting IL-8, such as colchicine, are under investigation for COVID-19, with one trial of outpatient colchicine demonstrating reduced rates of death or hospitalization in the group with polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-confirmed COVID-19 [12,13]. Although TAF did not show activity against COVID-19 in a cell model [14], TDF was not examined in that study, and there is other promising data for TDF in vitro and in a preclinical animal model. Among ferrets, SARS-CoV-2 viral loads decreased in nasal swabs with the administration of TDF/FTC, whereas lopinavir-ritonavir and hydroxychloroquine (both now shown to be ineffective for COVID-19 in clinical trials) had no effect on the animals’ nasal viral titers [15]. While subject to confounding, these observational and animal model studies are compelling enough to warrant further evaluation of TDF in randomized controlled trials for COVID-19 prevention and treatment. Such trials, however, have been few. For instance, a trial to examine TDF/FTC vs. placebo for COVID-19 prophylaxis in Spain has been recruiting healthcare workers since April, but the trial coincided with the introduction of nonpharmaceutical interventions, such as universal masking, and has not met its endpoints. Other sizable trials of TDF or TAF are planned or recruiting in Brazil, Colombia, Argentina, and France, but no trials of tenofovir for COVID-19 are registered in the U.S. or U.K. SOLIDARITY—the WHO's ongoing adaptive trial—recently reported that remdesivir, hydroxychloroquine, lopinavir, and interferon beta-1a all lacked benefit among patients hospitalized with COVID-19, but has not yet examined tenofovir [8]. It is notable that costly or scarce drugs—including remdesivir, a drug designed for Ebola but found to be ineffective; baricitinib, a janus kinase inhibitor for rheumatoid arthritis; and interferon beta-1a, a multiple sclerosis drug costing over $7 000 per month—were chosen for ACTT-2 and SOLIDARITY over an inexpensive and widely-available ART agent with promising in-vitro activity against SARS-CoV-2. Given our 30 years of experience treating HIV and a deep bench of available therapies, why not examine more ART agents—particularly TDF—in early adaptive trials? One possible explanation is that TDF is generic, meaning that it lacks a commercial sponsor and has fewer available pathways for investigation. Whereas patented drugs can be efficiently investigated by their manufacturer, generics rely on public agencies, who must choose between many therapeutic candidates and still often rely on industry for drug donations and trial support [16]. Many publicly funded trials opted to investigate hydroxychloroquine, in the context of overwhelming public interest, which unfortunately proved ineffective. Agents with stale patents or limited generic entry—still costly to purchase and study, but without financial incentives for the manufacturer to support trials—are potentially the ones least studied. Drug manufacturers have shown a strong public commitment in COVID-19, releasing patented drugs at fair prices and donating large supplies of experimental COVID-19 therapies. Nevertheless, they are for-profit companies and are primarily incentivized to investigate brand-name drugs for COVID-19. Gilead, which manufactures TDF, TAF, and remdesivir, is unlikely to fund trials of generic TDF, and alternative funding mechanisms are needed [16]. Importantly, even if tenofovir has lower efficacy than other experimental agents against COVID-19, its wide availability and low cost might still enable a greater public health impact. Indeed, due to its cost of roughly $3 000 per course and lack of clinical benefit in the SOLIDARITY trial [8], the WHO did not recommend remdesivir for worldwide use against COVID-19. Operation Warp Speed showcased the potential of public-private partnerships to overcome traditional market forces and accelerate discovery of COVID-19 interventions. We advocate that TDF/FTC or TDF be added as an arm to ongoing adaptive trials, such as ACTIV-2 or SOLIDARITY, or examined in investigator-led trials with support from Gilead. Supplies should be donated by Gilead to support its study in the United States and Europe, or purchased from generic manufacturers abroad. The swift arrival of a vaccine for COVID-19 is heartening, but vaccines will not be available in low-resource settings for some time. Some will not respond to vaccines and others may decline vaccination. Availability of more than one prevention option is likely to increase uptake, as we have seen for birth control and, increasingly, for HIV PrEP. As we learned from hydroxychloroquine, promoting untested drugs for COVID-19 can cause harm, both through adverse drug reactions and by constraining supply to those who rely on the drug for other conditions. In the case of tenofovir, there are also risks of HIV resistance if TDF becomes an experimental therapy for COVID-19. We do not advocate experimental use of tenofovir outside of trials, but rather, urge WHO and NIH to consider inclusion of tenofovir and other generic antiviral therapies in multiarmed therapeutic trials. We are urgently in need of COVID-19 therapies, especially for outpatients, that are both effective and accessible in low-resource settings around the world. Acknowledgements Funding/support: This research was supported by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases/National Institutes of Health grant R01AI158013 (M.A.S. and M.G.) and US NIAID P30AI027763 (M.G.) Role of the funder/sponsor: The National Institutes of Health had no role in the preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript or decision to submit it for publication. Conflicts of interest Dr C. DeJong reports that, in 2018, she was deposed as a legal expert witness in a case pertaining to pharmaceutical marketing to physicians. The other authors have nothing to disclose.

A neutrophil activation signature predicts critical illness and mortality in COVID-19

AbstractPathologic immune hyperactivation is emerging as a key feature of critical illness in COVID-19, but the mechanisms involved remain poorly understood. We carried out proteomic profiling of plasma from cross-sectional and longitudinal cohorts of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 and analyzed clinical data from our health system database of more than 3300 patients. Using a machine learning algorithm, we identified a prominent signature of neutrophil activation, including resistin, lipocalin-2, hepatocyte growth factor, interleukin-8, and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, which were the strongest predictors of critical illness. Evidence of neutrophil activation was present on the first day of hospitalization in patients who would only later require transfer to the intensive care unit, thus preceding the onset of critical illness and predicting increased mortality. In the health system database, early elevations in developing and mature neutrophil counts also predicted higher mortality rates. Altogether, these data suggest a central role for neutrophil activation in the pathogenesis of severe COVID-19 and identify molecular markers that distinguish patients at risk of future clinical decompensation.

Recombinant ADAMTS13 reduces abnormally up-regulated von Willebrand factor in plasma from patients with severe COVID-19

Thrombosis affecting the pulmonary and systemic vasculature is common during severe COVID-19 and causes adverse outcomes. Although thrombosis likely results from inflammatory activation of vascular cells, the mediators of thrombosis remain unconfirmed. In a cross-sectional cohort of 36 severe COVID-19 patients, we show that markedly increased plasma von Willebrand factor (VWF) levels were accompanied by a partial reduction in the VWF regulatory protease ADAMTS13. In all patients we find this VWF/ADAMTS13 imbalance to be associated with persistence of ultra-high-molecular-weight (UHMW) VWF multimers that are highly thrombogenic in some disease settings. Incubation of plasma samples from patients with severe COVID-19 with recombinant ADAMTS13 (rADAMTS13) substantially reduced the abnormally high VWF activity, reduced overall multimer size and depleted UHMW VWF multimers in a time and concentration dependent manner. Our data implicate disruption of normal VWF/ADAMTS13 homeostasis in the pathogenesis of severe COVID-19 and indicate that this can be reversed ex vivo by correction of low plasma ADAMTS13 levels. These findings suggest a potential therapeutic role for rADAMTS13 in helping restore haemostatic balance in COVID-19 patients.

Diabetes predicts severity of COVID-19 infection in a retrospective cohort: A mediatory role of the inflammatory biomarker C-reactive protein.

Diabetes is a risk factor for developing severe COVID‐19, but the pathogenesis remains unclear. We investigated if the association of diabetes and COVID‐19 severity may be mediated by inflammation. We also hypothesized that this increased risk may extend to prediabetes. Hospitalized patients in Singapore with COVID‐19 were subdivided into three groups in a retrospective cohort: normoglycemia (HbA1c: ≤5.6%), prediabetes (HbA1c: 5.7%–6.4%) and diabetes (HbA1c: ≥6.5%). The primary outcome of severe COVID‐19 was defined by respiratory rate ≥30, SpO2 ≤93% or intensive care unit admission. The association between clinical factors on severe COVID‐19 outcome was analyzed by cox regression. Adjusted mediation analysis of C‐reactive protein (CRP) on the relationship between diabetes and severe COVID‐19 was performed. Of 1042 hospitalized patients, mean age 39 ± 11 years, 13% had diabetes, 9% prediabetes and 78% normoglycemia. Severe COVID‐19 occurred in 4.9% of subjects. Compared to normoglycemia, diabetes was significantly associated with severe COVID‐19 on both univariate (hazard ratio [HR]: 9.94; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.54–17.84; p < .001) and multivariate analysis (HR: 3.99; 95% CI: 1.92–8.31; p < .001), while prediabetes was not a risk factor (HR: 0.94; 95% CI: 0.22–4.03; p = .929). CRP, a biomarker of inflammation, mediated 32.7% of the total association between diabetes and severe COVID‐19 outcome. In conclusion, CRP is a partial mediator of the association between diabetes and severe COVID‐19 infection, confirming that inflammation is important in the pathogenesis of severe COVID‐19 in diabetes.