Effects Of Patch Isolation Research Articles

Scale‐dependent effects of landscape structure on pollinator traits, species interactions and pollination success

The environmental filtering of species traits can influence the identity of their interaction partners and the contribution of species interactions to ecosystem functioning, but the extent to which this process is influenced by landscape composition and configuration remains unclear. We combined a field experiment with an agent‐based model to assess how landscape structure and local flower patch isolation affect pollinator body‐size distribution and plant–pollinator interactions, sampled at different spatial extents. We then evaluated how these changes in pollinator functional (i.e. body‐size) diversity influence plant reproduction. We observed higher pollinator functional diversity in less‐isolated patches, which promoted plant reproduction via a relationship between functional diversity and interaction complementarity. This complementarity occurred partly because larger pollinators interacted with more plant species. Moreover, we showed that patch configuration at the landscape level can change the direction of these local‐scale patch isolation effects on pollinator body‐size distribution, functional diversity and plant–pollinator interactions. Importantly, these relationships were robust to sampling spatial extent. Thus, management strategies to promote pollination should account for local resources and landscape structure, because response, effect and interaction traits like body size connect landscape filtering effects with local community responses and outcomes of interaction‐based functions.

Habitat amount, not patch size and isolation, drives species richness of macro‐moth communities in countryside landscapes

AbstractAimOur aim was to test whether species richness patterns are best explained by the effect of the total amount of habitat within the landscape, or instead by a combination of patch size and patch isolation effects. To this end, we jointly contrast the habitat amount hypothesis and countryside biogeography with patch size and isolation concepts from island biogeography.LocationThree multi‐habitat landscapes in Peneda‐Gerês National Park, NW Portugal.TaxonMacro‐moths (Lepidoptera).MethodsLight‐trapping using a semi‐nested design at 84 fixed sites which were each repeatedly sampled six times.ResultsAutocovariate models show that sampling sites with a higher number of forest and meadow macro‐moth species (alpha diversity) were surrounded by a higher amount of forest and meadow habitat, respectively within a 160 and 320 m radius (scale of effect). These top‐ranked models, containing only habitat amount as a significant variable, had lower Akaike's information criteria (AIC) than models (only) containing patch size and/or isolation. Complementary to this, the countryside species–area relationship (SAR) model outperforms the classic SAR model, so that the effective area of habitat explains landscape species richness (gamma diversity) across spatial scales (beta diversity) better than the classic SAR. Specifically, we show that forest macro‐moths have a higher spatial turnover than meadow macro‐moths and that, on average, there are more species in forest than in meadow habitat.Main conclusionsThe habitat amount hypothesis predicts alpha species richness in multi‐habitat landscapes better than do patch size and isolation while the countryside SAR predicts beta and gamma diversity better than the classic SAR. We suggest that evidence is mounting to revise the application of the classical approaches of island biogeography and metapopulation theory to conservation biogeography.

An early synthesis of the habitat amount hypothesis

The ecological literature is filled with studies highlighting the importance of both habitat loss and fragmentation on biodiversity. The patch concept has been central to these findings, being also at the heart of many ecological theories. Recently, the habitat amount hypothesis has been proposed as an alternative, where the patch concept is put to a rest, and both patch size and patch isolation effects on species richness are reduced to a single gradient: habitat loss in the landscape. As this theory stated clear predictions that could be experimentally tested, many formal tests of the hypothesis have been published recently and this study aims at synthesizing their results. A meta-analysis of 13 tests of the habitat amount hypothesis was conducted, to produce a single combined test of the theory. The 13 tests combined suggest that effects of patch size and isolation, while controlling for habitat amounts, do exist although their overall effect is weak (r = 0.158). Literal interpretations of the habitat amount hypothesis, where patch size and isolation have absolutely no effect on species richness, are probably oversimplifications of the processes at work. Still, the theory could prove useful as a baseline of the effects of habitat loss, against which patch size and isolation effects must be contrasted.

Rethinking patch size and isolation effects: the habitat amount hypothesis

AbstractI challenge (1) the assumption that habitat patches are natural units of measurement for species richness, and (2) the assumption of distinct effects of habitat patch size and isolation on species richness. I propose a simpler view of the relationship between habitat distribution and species richness, the ‘habitat amount hypothesis’, and I suggest ways of testing it. The habitat amount hypothesis posits that, for habitat patches in a matrix of non‐habitat, the patch size effect and the patch isolation effect are driven mainly by a single underlying process, the sample area effect. The hypothesis predicts that species richness in equal‐sized sample sites should increase with the total amount of habitat in the ‘local landscape’ of the sample site, where the local landscape is the area within an appropriate distance of the sample site. It also predicts that species richness in a sample site is independent of the area of the particular patch in which the sample site is located (its ‘local patch’), except insofar as the area of that patch contributes to the amount of habitat in the local landscape of the sample site. The habitat amount hypothesis replaces two predictor variables, patch size and isolation, with a single predictor variable, habitat amount, when species richness is analysed for equal‐sized sample sites rather than for unequal‐sized habitat patches. Studies to test the hypothesis should ensure that ‘habitat’ is correctly defined, and the spatial extent of the local landscape is appropriate, for the species group under consideration. If supported, the habitat amount hypothesis would mean that to predict the relationship between habitat distribution and species richness: (1) distinguishing between patch‐scale and landscape‐scale habitat effects is unnecessary; (2) distinguishing between patch size effects and patch isolation effects is unnecessary; (3) considering habitat configuration independent of habitat amount is unnecessary; and (4) delineating discrete habitat patches is unnecessary.

The effect of patch isolation on epifaunal colonization in two different seagrass ecosystems

The macrofaunal colonization of isolated habitats is affected by many factors, ranging from distance to the nearest source population to the dispersal mechanism of the species. We investigated the initial epifaunal colonization at two sites, one situated in the Northern Gulf of Mexico and the other in the Northern Baltic Sea. At each site, artificial seagrass units were placed at 10- and 20-m distances from a continuous seagrass meadow, as well as inside the meadow over a 5-day colonization time. With the exception of amphipods in Gulf of Mexico, patch isolation had a negative effect on colonization for the other faunal species, irrespective of the sites. This inverse colonization pattern of amphipods suggests that they are not equally sensitive to patch isolation in different regions. Our results indicate that increasing habitat isolation can have serious consequences for the community composition of seagrass epifauna. Furthermore, we emphasize the need for larger-scale latitudinal comparative studies.

Distribution of burnet moths (Zygaenaspp.) in relation to larval and adult resources on two spatial scales

Abstract. Metapopulation theory predicts habitat patch area and isolation to be the main factors affecting the distribution of species dependent of patchily distributed habitats, but the need for multiple resources, which might be spatially separated, is often ignored.Here, I studied the effect of host plant and nectar flower distributions on the spatial distribution of pupae and adults of two species of burnet moths (Zygaena filipendulaeandZygaena lonicerae), on two spatial scales.At the landscape scale (10 × 12 km), moths were patchily distributed, but there was no effect of patch isolation on the occurrence of any of the species. On the local scale (2 × 2 km), I expected to find additive effects of the local abundances of larval and adult resources and their abundances in the surrounding areas, but instead, moth abundance decreased with increasing resource connectivity. I interpret this as an aggregation effect, such that at low resource abundances in the area, moths tend to aggregate in patches with higher flower densities.My results also supported the hypothesis that the spatial distribution of individuals at one life stage is restricted by the requirement of other life stages, because the abundance of pupae of both species were associated with floral resources and abundance of imagos was related to larval resources.I conclude that in studies aiming at understanding the relative importance of local and regional factors for species distributions, it is important to account for the habitat requirements of all life stages.

Urban amphibian assemblages as metacommunities

1. Urban ecosystems are expanding throughout the world, and urban ecology is attracting increasing research interest. Some authors have questioned the value of existing ecological theories for understanding the processes and consequences of urbanization. 2. In order to assess the applicability of metacommunity theory to urban systems, I evaluated three assumptions that underlie the theory - the effect of patch area, the effect of patch isolation, and species-environment relations - using data on assemblages of pond-breeding amphibians in the Greater Melbourne area of Australia. I also assessed the relative impact of habitat fragmentation, habitat isolation, and changes to habitat quality on these assemblages. 3. Poisson regression modelling provided support for an important increase in species richness with patch area (pond size) and a decrease in species richness with increasing patch isolation, as measured by surrounding road cover. Holding all other variables constant, species richness was predicted to be 2.8-5.5 times higher at the largest pond than at the smallest, while the most isolated pond was predicted to have 12-19% of the species richness of the least isolated pond. Thus, the data were consistent with the first two assumptions of metacommunity theory evaluated. 4. The quality of habitat at a pond was also important, with a predicted 44-56% decrease in the number of species detected at ponds with a surrounding vertical wall compared with those with a gently sloping bank. This demonstrates that environmental differences between habitat patches were also influencing amphibian assemblages, providing support for the species-sorting and/or mass-effect perspectives of metacommunity theory. 5. Without management intervention, urbanization may lead to a reduction in the number of amphibian species persisting in urban ponds, particularly where increasing isolation of ponds by roads and associated infrastructure reduces the probability of re-colonization following local extinction. Journal of Animal Ecology (2006) 75, 757-764 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2006.01096.x.

Fitness-consequences of geitonogamous selfing in a clonal marine angiosperm (Zostera marina).

Plant mating systems have received considerable attention because the proportion of selfed vs. outcrossed progeny is an important evolutionary factor. In clonally reproducing plants, geitonogamous selfing between distant ramets belonging to the same genet is expected to be widespread, yet empirical data are sparse. Nothing is known about between-ramet selfing in aquatic flowering plants with subaqueous pollen transfer, most of which display pronounced clonal reproduction. From two locations in the western Baltic Sea, I present data on the effects of patch isolation and clonal diversity on the outcrossing rate of eelgrass, Zostera marina L., based on the genotypes of maternal plants and recently fertilized ovules scored at eight microsatellite loci. There were no differences in outcrossing rates between vegetation patches and continuous meadow although patches were nearly always composed of single genets. Quantitative effects of clonal diversity were present in the continuous vegetation where a significant positive correlation between genet diversity and the proportion of outcrossed offspring was detected (Kendall's τ=0.82, P=0.0017). On a population-scale as well, the genotypic diversity was positively correlated with outcrossing. The relative fitness of selfed offspring was low (ω ± 95% confidence interval=0.56 ± 0.032 and 0.322 ± 0.15) indicating that geitonogamy incurred substantial fitness costs. Selfing rates in Z. marina may not be in evolutionary equilibrium because of spatial and temporal heterogeneity of clonal size and diversity. The high prevalence of dioecy in seagrasses may have evolved to avoid the fitness costs associated with geitonogamy.

The effect of patch isolation on reproductive synchrony in the root vole

Both social and environmental cues can synchronise breeding, but are likely to operate at different spatial and temporal scales. Here we test if breeding is synchronised at the patch or the population level in experimental patchy populations of root voles. We found no overall synchronisation neither at the patch nor at the population level. However, at the patch level, breeding was synchronised within patches if the patches were isolated and thus had little exchange of animals with other patches. In accordance with what has been predicted for matrilineally structured populations, we conclude that breeding synchrony is facilitated when social cues are exchanged within stable female groups.