228 Reviews Poetry gets a chapter to itself,but theatre only figuresthrough Theatre of the Absurd in the chapter on experimental writing, and there is no discussion of autobiography except in so far as it features in autobiographical fiction. There is little that is overtly revisionisthere, either in the account of principal trends oftwentieth-century French literature or in the choice of authors fordiscussion. The roll-call of important writers runs from Proust and Gide through to Perec and Tournier, taking in Apollinaire, Bonnefoy, Ponge, Eluard, Sartre, Camus, Robbe-Grillet, Sarraute, Beckett, Ionesco, Genet, Colette, Beauvoir, Duras, and Cixous along the way. Inevitably in a book such as this, there is not enough space forsome authors who might have a claim for inclu? sion, such as Valery, Claudel, Cocteau, Mauriac, Giraudoux, or Malraux. Only one francophone author is discussed (Djebar), and the chapter on recent fiction focuses on three works, Perec's W ou le souvenir d'enfance, Tournier's Le Roi des Aulnes, and Djebar's Les Femmes d'Alger dans leur appartement. Throughout, the author high? lights existential, experiential aspects of literature, so that even the most experimental writing is shown to be engaging with important issues as it strains to find new ways to express the traumas of the twentieth century. Literature emerges as a medium in which the possibilities and limits of ideas, identity, and experience can be explored. This is not primarily intended forthe specialist; rather it attempts to demonstrate to a less expert readership that French literature of the twentieth century is not as remote from our day-to-day concerns as it might sometimes appear. The touch is light and the more obscure quirks of critical languages are either avoided or explained. The book has the virtues of elegance, reliability, and accessibility, and it can be recommended with confidence to students who are new to the field. It should become a standard feature on introductory bibliographies for literature of the last century. University of Warwick Colin Davis Multilingualism in Italy Past and Present. Ed. by Anna Laura Lepschy and Arturo Tosi. Oxford: Legenda. 2002. x + 22opp. ?35. ISBN 1-900755-78-5. This interesting collection of articles derives from papers delivered at the Italian Cultural Institute in London on 20 October 2001, on the occasion ofthe Italian Lan? guage Week, under the auspices of the Italian Foreign Ministry and the Accademia della Crusca. Each paper in the volume, edited by Anna Laura Lepschy and Arturo Tosi, offersa stimulating reading on central questions in Italian linguistics, covering subjects from the formation of the language and the role of written and spoken Ita? lian in Italy and abroad, to contemporary issues of dialectology, sociolinguistics, and translation in the context of the European Union. The firstchapter, on 'The Italian of Renaissance Elites in Italy and Europe', by Brian Richardson, looks into the differenttypes of Italian available to members of the elites and to those of lower status in the fifteenthand sixteenth centuries, from both a written and a spoken point of view. The second chapter, by the late Joe Cremona, deals with 'Italian-Based Lingua Francas around the Mediterranean' in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, tackling 'a role of Italian almost wholly ignored by the historians of language, [. . .] that of being the chief diplomatic language between Europeans and Turks in the whole of the vast Ottoman Empire' (p. 26) and Italian's status as 'default language' (p. 27) in French and English consular documents of the time from Tunis and Tripoli. The two subsequent chapters explore the notion of multilingualism: Martin Maiden deals with the 'Definition of Multilingualism in Historical Perspective' (Chap? ter 3) and Mair Parry with 'The Challenges of Multilingualism Today' (Chapter 4). Nigel Vincent's 'Benvenuto Terracini and the Problem of Language Death' (Chap? ter 5) revisits, with original insights, a 1951 article by Terracini, reflectingalso on his MLRy ioo.i, 2005 229 position in the history of the realism versus idealism debate within Italian linguistics (see in particular pp. 67-69). Language-endangerment issues are as pressing as ever fiftyyears after Terracini's analysis: if?according to figures given by David Crystal in his Language Death (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000)?we...
Read full abstract