Many approaches to restoring salt marsh habitats assume flora will naturally colonize the restoration site following the reinstatement of tidal hydrology that is appropriate for halophytes. However, this passive strategy can fail to meet restoration targets because of unfavorable site conditions and/or limited propagule dispersal. This study analyzes propagule availability in a restored southern California salt marsh that experienced slow passive revegetation following sediment addition to combat subsidence‐driven habitat loss. We performed a seedling emergence experiment to assess the quantity and species composition of viable halophyte seeds in the restoration site compared to nearby established salt marsh habitat. Additionally, we irrigated seed bank samples with freshwater or saltwater to test the effects of restoration site salinity conditions on seedling emergence and survival. Due to the proximity of the restoration site to seed sources, we expected to find ample seeds within its seed bank. However, only two seedlings emerged from restoration site seed bank samples (collected over 1.18 m2 of soil surface area), compared to an average of 44.33 seedlings from control site samples. Control site samples receiving saltwater irrigation had similar quantities of seedlings emerge, but seedlings in salt water had a reduced survival rate compared to seedlings in the freshwater treatment. Overall, these results suggest that passive restoration should be paired with techniques that retain seeds, such as increasing the topographic complexity of the restoration site. However, in scenarios where salinity or elevation may limit seedling recruitment, active planting should be considered to speed restoration trajectories.