Passive Fixation Research Articles

Outcome of transvenous lead extraction in nonagenarians: A single-center retrospective study.

Transvenous lead extraction (TLE) for cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED)-related infections has increased. The incidence of TLE in nonagenarians is low, with limited reports outlining the outcomes of this procedure. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to clarify the outcomes of TLE in nonagenarians. Patients with TLE treated at our hospital between 2014 and 2023 were retrospectively examined; patient characteristics, device type, indications, procedures, complications, and clinical data of nonagenarians were analyzed. Of 12 patients with 24 leads (active fixation lead, n=11; passive fixation lead, n=13) who underwent TLE, the indication for TLE was infection (pocket infection, n=8; sepsis, n=4). Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis was the most frequently identified causative agent (n=4). The median patient age was 91 years; five patients were female. The median lead dwell time was 9 years. Excimer laser sheath (16 leads), mechanical sheath (five leads), Evolution RL (one lead), and manual traction (two leads) were employed in TLE. The procedure was successful in all patients, and only one had a minor complication. Six patients required CIED re-implantation, and leadless pacemakers were selected for five patients. The 30-day mortality after TLE was 0%. TLE can be safely performed in nonagenarians. The decision to perform TLE should not be based on old age alone; the suitability of removing infected CIEDs should be determined based on each patient's condition.

Clinical Usefulness of the Active Fixation Quadripolar Left Ventricular Lead Compared With the Passive Fixation Quadripolar Lead in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.

This study compared the stability of the Medtronic Attain Stability Quad (ASQ), a novel quadripolar active fixation left ventricular (LV) lead with a side helix, to that of conventional quadripolar leads with passive fixation (non-ASQ) and evaluated their LV lead performance. In all, 183 consecutive patients (69 ASQ, 114 non-ASQ) who underwent cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) between January 2018 and June 2021 were enrolled. Complications, including elevated pacing capture threshold (PCT) levels, phrenic nerve stimulation (PNS), and LV lead dislodgement, were analyzed during the postimplantation period until the first outpatient visit after discharge. The frequency of LV lead-related complications was significantly lower in the ASQ than non-ASQ group (14% vs. 30%, respectively; P=0.019). Specifically, LV lead dislodgement occurred only in the non-ASQ group, and elevated PCT levels were significantly lower in the ASQ group (7% vs. 23%; P=0.007). Kaplan-Meier analysis confirmed a significantly lower incidence of LV lead-related complications in the ASQ group (log-rank P=0.005). Cox multivariable regression analysis showed a significant reduction in lead-related complications associated with ASQ (hazard ratio 0.44; 95% confidence interval 0.23-0.83; P=0.011). The ASQ group exhibited fewer LV lead-related complications requiring reintervention and setting changes than the non-ASQ group. Thus, the ASQ may be a favorable choice for CRT device implantation.

Roles of MDA-LDL/OX-LDL/LOX-1 and TNF-α/TLR4/NF-κB Signaling Pathways in Myocardial Damage by Implantations of Cardiac Pacemakers in Elderly Patients.

Permanent pacemakers are an established treatment for sick sinus syndrome and high-grade atrioventricular block. Permanent cardiac pacemaker implantations may damage the myocardium. This study evaluated markers of myocardial injury, oxidative stress and inflammation in elderly patients with permanent pacemaker implantations. Various markers were measured at 1, 2, 3 and 4 months after permanent pacemaker implantations in elderly patients. The levels of high-sensitivity troponin T (hsTnT), lectin-like oxidized low-density lipoprotein receptor-1 (LOX-1), malondialdehyde-modified low-density lipoprotein (MDA-LDL), oxidized low-density lipoprotein (OX-LDL), tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) and nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB) were increased in 2-month group compared with control and 1- month groups (P<0.001), and were further increased at 4-month group compared with 2- and 3- month groups after pacemaker implantations (P<0.001). Patients with dual-chamber pacemakers had higher levels of hsTnT, LOX-1, MDA-LDL, OX-LDL, TNF-α, TLR4 and NF-κB than patients with single chamber pacemakers (P<0.001). Patients who underwent the pacemakers with the active fixation leads had raised levels of hsTnT, LOX-1, MDA-LDL, OX-LDL, TNF-α, TLR4 and NF-κB compared patients with pacemakers using the passive fixation leads (P<0.001). Myocardial blood flows in 3-month and 4-month groups were lower than 1-month and 2-month groups (P<0.001). Levels of hsTnT, LOX-1, MDA-LDL, OX-LDL, TNF-α, TLR4 and NF-κB were elevated in elderly patients with permanent pacemaker implantations and the activations of oxidative stress and pro-inflammatory signalling pathways may be associated with myocardial damages and ischemia after pacemaker implantations in elderly patients.

Removal of spontaneously fractured leads with their proximal ends in the heart and vasculature -experience among 3847 lead extraction procedures

Abstract Background Spontaneous fractures and insulation breaks of the intracardiac leads near their entry into the venous system cause the proximal end of the fractured lead slide into the veins, with potential subsequent looping in the heart and secondary complications. So far, this topic has not been extensively studied. As it is a relatively uncommon finding, it has been described in a few number of case studies only. The aim of the study was to describe the phenomenon of leads migrated proximal end (LMPEs) into the cardiovascular system and techniques for such leads removal. Methods Retrospective analysis of 3847 transvenous lead extractions (TLE). Results Over a 17-year period 72 (1.87%) leads with migrated proximal ends (LMPEs) (mean dwell time 148.0 months) were extracted, mainly ventricular leads (56.94%). Overall, 68.06% of MPLEs had their cut proximal ends located in the venous system. Most of them were pacing (95.83%) and passive fixation (98.61%) leads. Independent risk factors for LMPEs included abandoned leads (OR=8.473; p&amp;lt;0.001) and leads on both sides of the chest (2.981; p=0.045). Higher NYHA class lowered the probability of leads with migrated proximal ends (LMPEs) (OR=0.380; p&amp;lt;0.001). Extraction complexity was higher in the MPLE group than in remained patients. Femoral approach was most often used (62.50%), contrary to superior (23.61%) and combined approach (11.11%). Lead dilatation was necessary in 80.56%, and grasping and traction was effective in 18.06%. In 66.7%, the proximal end was strongly attached to the wall and a pulling loop had to be applied. In 15.28% of procedures the lead was wrapped around a pig-tail catheter ("spaghetti twisting technique"), which was sometimes sufficient to free the lead end. This manoeuvre was especially helpful in releasing the leads with their tip in the distal branch of the pulmonary artery. All these manoeuvres were performed from the femoral or superior approach, depending on the anatomical conditions. Extraction of MPLEs did not influence long-term survival. The rate of major complications was 2.78% but it may be attributed to long implant duration (152.2 months) and were not the result of extraction of LMPEs. Conclusions 1. Extraction of leads with migrated proximal ends (LMPEs) is rare among other TLE procedures (1.9%), 2. Risk factors include abandoned leads and presence of leads on both sides of the chest. 3. Complexity of LMPEs extraction is higher as regards procedure duration, unexpected procedure difficulties, use of advanced tools and techniques but rates of major complications are comparable to other leads but in spite of a high level of procedure complexity its effectiveness is also high (procedural success rate 93.06%) with an acceptable rate of major complications. 4. Extraction of LMPEs did not influence long-term survival.

Lead break during extraction - predisposing factors and impact on procedure complexity and outcome on the basis of analysis of 3825 procedures

Abstract Background There are no reports describing lead break (LB) during transvenous lead extraction (TLE). Our aim was to compare the effectiveness of different approaches and tools used for LB removal during 127 procedures. Methods Retrospective analysis of 3825 consecutive TLEs using mechanical sheaths. Results Fracture of the lead defined as LB with a long lead fragment (LF) occurred in 2.48%, LB with a short LF in 1.20%, LB with the tip of the lead in 1.78% and LB with loss of a free-floating LF in 0.57% of cases. In total, extractions with LB occurred in 6.04%. In cases in which lead remnant was equivalent to a lead fragment (more than the lead tip only) there was a 50.31% chance of removing the LF in its entirety and an 18.41% chance of significantly reducing its length (to less than 4 cm). Risk factors for LB are similar to those for major complications and increased procedure complexity: long lead dwell time [OR=1.018], higher LV ejection fraction, multiple previous CIED-related procedures and extraction of passive fixation leads. A superior approach was the most popular (75.59%), femoral (15.75%) and combined (8.66%) approaches were the least common. Broken lead fragments (BLFs) were removed in their entirety in 63.78% and BLF length was significantly reduced (to less than 4 cm) in 24.41%. The best results were achieved when BLFs were longer (&amp;gt;4 cm) (66.67%), either free-floating or in the pulmonary circulation (68.42%) but not in cases of short BLFs (20.0%). Complete procedural success was achieved in 70.87% of procedures, the lead tip retained in the heart wall and short BLFs were found in 25.98%, whereas BLFs &amp;gt; 4 cm were left in place in 3.15% of procedures only. There was no relationship between approach in lead remnant removal and long-term mortality. All forms of LB were associated with increased procedure complexity and major complications (9.96% and 1.53%). There was no procedure-related death among such patients and LB did not affect survival after TLE. Conclusions 1. LB during TLE occurs in 6.04% of procedures and it increases procedure complexity and risk of major complications. Thus, the possibility of LB should be taken into account when planning lead extraction strategy and training. 2. Effectiveness of fractured lead removal is satisfactory. 3.Risk factors for lead fracture are implant duration (16.27 years on average), ventricular leads (71.65%), passive fixation leads (97.63%) and pacemaker leads (92.13%), but not ICD leads (only 7.87% of lead fractures). 4. Broken lead removal using a coronary sinus access sheath as a "subclavian workstation" for continuation of dilatation with conventional tools deserves attention.

LECOM (Lead Extraction COMplexity): a new scoring system for prediction of a difficult procedure

Abstract Background Transvenous lead extraction (TLE) can become far more complex when unanticipated difficulties arise. Aim The aim of this study was to develop a simple scoring system that allows prediction of difficulty and complexity of this important procedure. Methods Based on a retrospective analysis of 3741 extraction procedures (extended fluoroscopy time, need for second-line instruments, and advanced techniques and instruments), a 5-point Complex Indicator of Difficulty of T(LE) Procedure (CID-TLEP) scale was developed. Two or more points on the CID-TLEP scale indicated a higher level of procedure complexity. Results Multivariate regression analysis showed that patient age below 51 years at first CIED implantation, number of abandoned leads, number of previous CIED-related procedures, passive fixation leads to be extracted, multiple leads to be extracted, and a ratio of dwell time of oldest extracted lead to patient age during TLE of &amp;gt;0.13 are significant predictors of higher levels of lead extraction complexity. The ROC analysis demonstrated that the total number of points (the sum of the odds ratios of the above variables) of &amp;gt;9.697 indicated a 21.83% higher probability of complex TLE (sensitivity 74.08%, specificity 74.46%). Finally, the logistic function model was employed, and a simple equation for Lead Extraction COMplexity was constructed to predict the probability of a difficult procedure. The risk of complex extraction (in percentage) was calculated as [1/(1 + 55.34·0.754X)]·100 (P &amp;lt; 0.001). Conclusion (1) The LECOM score can effectively predict the risk of a difficult transvenous lead extraction procedure, and (2) Predicting the probability of a more complex procedure may help clinicians in planning lead removal and improving patient management. (3) Simple on-line calculator should be available to predict a difficulty of planned TLE procedure and to allow to send more demanding patient to more experienced high-volume centre.

Brain2GAN: Feature-disentangled neural encoding and decoding of visual perception in the primate brain.

A challenging goal of neural coding is to characterize the neural representations underlying visual perception. To this end, multi-unit activity (MUA) of macaque visual cortex was recorded in a passive fixation task upon presentation of faces and natural images. We analyzed the relationship between MUA and latent representations of state-of-the-art deep generative models, including the conventional and feature-disentangled representations of generative adversarial networks (GANs) (i.e., z- and w-latents of StyleGAN, respectively) and language-contrastive representations of latent diffusion networks (i.e., CLIP-latents of Stable Diffusion). A mass univariate neural encoding analysis of the latent representations showed that feature-disentangled w representations outperform both z and CLIP representations in explaining neural responses. Further, w-latent features were found to be positioned at the higher end of the complexity gradient which indicates that they capture visual information relevant to high-level neural activity. Subsequently, a multivariate neural decoding analysis of the feature-disentangled representations resulted in state-of-the-art spatiotemporal reconstructions of visual perception. Taken together, our results not only highlight the important role of feature-disentanglement in shaping high-level neural representations underlying visual perception but also serve as an important benchmark for the future of neural coding.

Leads with the Cut Proximal Ends Migrated into the Heart and Vasculature: A Rare Phenomenon among 3847 Lead Extraction Procedures.

Background: The study aimed to describe the phenomenon of leads migrated (MPLE) into the cardiovascular system (CVS). Methods: Retrospective analysis of 3847 transvenous lead extractions (TLE). Results: Over a 17-year period, 72 (1.87%) MPLEs (median dwell time 137.5 months) were extracted, which included mainly ventricular leads (56.94%). Overall, 68.06% of MPLEs had their cut proximal ends in the venous system. Most of them were pacing (95.83%) and passive fixation (98.61%) leads. Independent risk factors for MPLE included abandoned leads (OR = 8.473; p < 0.001) and leads located on both sides of the chest (2.981; p = 0.045). The higher NYHA class lowered the probability of MPLE (OR = 0.380; p < 0.001). Procedure complexity was higher in the MPLE group (procedure duration, unexpected procedure difficulties, use of additional (advanced) tools and alternative venous approach). There were no more major complications in the MPLE group, but the rate of procedural success was lower due to more frequent retention of non-removable lead fragments. Extraction of MPLEs did not influence long-term survival. Conclusions: 1. Extraction of leads with MPLE is rare among other TLE procedures (1.9%), 2. risk factors include abandoned leads and presence of leads on both sides of the chest but a higher NYHA class lowers the probability of MPLE, 3. complexity of MPLE extraction is higher regarding procedure duration, unexpected procedure difficulties, use of advanced tools and techniques but rates of major complications are comparable, and 4. extraction of MPLEs did not influence long-term survival.

Lead Break during Extraction: Predisposing Factors and Impact on Procedure Complexity and Outcome: Analysis of 3825 Procedures.

Background: Currently, there are no reports describing lead break (LB) during transvenous lead extraction (TLE). Methods: This study conducted a retrospective analysis of 3825 consecutive TLEs using mechanical sheaths. Results: Fracture of the lead, defined as LB, with a long lead fragment (LF) occurred in 2.48%, LB with a short LF in 1.20%, LB with the tip of the lead in 1.78%, and LB with loss of a free-floating LF in 0.57% of cases. In total, extractions with LB occurred in 6.04% of the cases studied. In cases in which the lead remnant comprises more than the tip only, there was a 50.31% chance of removing the lead fragment in its entirety and an 18.41% chance of significantly reducing its length (to less than 4 cm). Risk factors for LB are similar to those for major complications and increased procedure complexity, including long lead dwell time [OR = 1.018], a higher LV ejection fraction, multiple previous CIED-related procedures, and the extraction of passive fixation leads. The LECOM and LED scores also exhibit a high predictive value. All forms of LB were associated with increased procedure complexity and major complications (9.96 vs. 1.53%). There was no incidence of procedure-related death among such patients, and LB did not affect the survival statistics after TLE. Conclusions: LB during TLE occurs in 6.04% of procedures, and this predictable difficulty increases procedure complexity and the risk of major complications. Thus, the possibility of LB should be taken into account when planning the lead extraction strategy and its associated training.

Analysis of 1051 ICD Leads Extractions in Search of Factors Affecting Procedure Difficulty and Complications: Number of Coils, Tip Fixation and Position-Does It Matter?

Background: Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) leads are considered a risk factor for major complications (MC) during transvenous lead extraction (TLE). Methods: We analyzed 3878 TLE procedures (including 1051 ICD lead extractions). Results: In patients with ICD lead removal, implant duration was almost half as long (69.69 vs. 114.0 months; p < 0.001), procedure complexity (duration of dilatation of all extracted leads, use of more advanced tools or additional venous access) (15.13% vs. 20.78%; p < 0.001) and MC (0.67% vs. 2.62%; p < 0.001) were significantly lower as compared to patients with pacing lead extraction. The procedural success rate was higher in these patients (98.29% vs. 94.04%; p < 0.001). Extraction of two or more ICD leads or additional superior vena cava (SVC) coil significantly prolonged procedure time, increased procedure complexity and use of auxiliary or advanced tools but did not influence the rate of MC. The type of ICD lead fixation and tip position did not affect TLE complexity, complications and clinical success although passive fixation reduces the likelihood of procedural success (OR = 0.297; p = 0.011). Multivariable regression analysis showed that ICD lead implant duration ≥120 months (OR = 2.956; p < 0.001) and the number of coils in targeted ICD lead(s) (OR = 2.123; p = 0.003) but not passive-fixation ICD leads (1.361; p = 0.149) or single coil ICD leads (OR = 1.540; p = 0.177) were predictors of higher procedure complexity, but had no influence on MC or clinical and procedural success. ICD lead implant duration was of crucial importance, similar to the number of leads. Lead dwell time >10 years is associated with a high level of procedure difficulty and complexity but not with MC and procedure-related deaths. Conclusions: The main factors affecting the transvenous removal of ICD leads are implant duration and the number of targeted ICD leads. Dual coil and passive fixation ICD leads are a bit more difficult to extract whereas fixation mechanism and tip position play a much less dominant role.

Strategies to maximize lead tensile strength during extraction in three families of pacing leads

BackgroundTraction force that can be applied to an extraction rail is based on lead tensile strength, a product of its construction. A strong rail allows safe advancement of the extraction sheath. This study expands previous work providing strategies to optimize INGEVITY rail strength. ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to measure forces that leads encounter in a simulated extraction procedure, determine lead response, and develop extraction recommendations for INGEVITY, INGEVITY+, and FINELINE II lead families. MethodsLeads were positioned in a simulated right atrial appendage implant. Subsequent traction forces enabled evaluation of lead tensile strength and effectiveness of preparation/extraction techniques. ResultsSignificant findings include (1) preserving the lead terminal pin did not decrease lead tensile strength and typically maximized it; (2) the weakest region is between the cathode and anode; (3) mid lead scar increases traction force tolerance until that scar is removed; and (4) optimal rail strength was observed using a multivenous approach with a femoral snare. Unique lead family findings include increased tensile strength of FINELINE II polyurethane vs silicone and INGEVITY active fixation vs passive fixation. ConclusionThis study teaches the implanting clinician there are specific extraction techniques available to improve the removal of leads that may be the best option for a patient's clinical needs. Bench testing demonstrates that lead construction drives lead behavior during an extraction. Preserving the lead terminal pin provides consistent and, in most cases, optimal rail strength. If clinically indicated, a multivenous approach using a femoral snare significantly increases rail strength and protects the vulnerable lead tip.

Neuromuscular Disorders And Prosthodontic Strategies In Complete Denture Patients

Neuromuscular disorders leads to loss of muscle function because they affect the musculature and/or the nervous system. Etiology could be due to autoimmune disorders, genetic/hereditary disorders. The process of mastication is controlled and coordinated by a well-defined neurological system which primarily consists of skeletal muscles, motor and sensory nerve fibers. This neuromuscular control involves in every phase of complete denture prosthesis construction. Skeletal muscles directly play a vital role in complete denture prosthesis function. A good muscular control and coordination is necessary for denture stability by means of active and passive muscle fixation. Muscles of mastication and muscles of facial expression are widely involved in denture stability. Hence neuromuscular control plays a vital role in denture construction as well as function.

Subacute right ventricular perforation from a passive fixation pacemaker lead - a multidisciplinary diagnostic and management work-up

Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) implantation procedure has a complication rate of 5-6% according to most studies. Lead perforation is a possible and serious adverse event which can present with a spectrum of symptoms from asymptomatic to sudden death. Diagnostic tools in case of suspected lead perforation are X-ray, transthoracic echocardiography, pacemaker interrogation and computed tomography with the last one being the gold standard. Lead extraction could be done endovascularly or surgically. Transvenous removal is a possible option for active &amp;#64257; xation leads, while removal of passive &amp;#64257; xation leads is preferably done surgically, because of the bulky tip of the lead, which could damage the heart chambers and the vessels. In this article, we present a case of a massive ventricular perforation from a passive &amp;#64257; xation lead, further complicated by a cardiac tamponade. Surgical removal was the treatment of choice with subsequent implantation of a permanent dual-chamber pacemaker.&amp;nbsp;

LECOM (Lead Extraction COMplexity): A New Scoring System for Predicting a Difficult Procedure.

(1) Background: Transvenous lead extraction (TLE) can become far more complex when unanticipated difficulties arise. The aim was to develop a simple scoring system that allows for the prediction of the difficulty and complexity of this significant procedure. (2) Methods: Based on analysis of 3741 TLE procedures with and without complicating factors (extended fluoroscopy time, need for second-line instruments, and advanced techniques and instruments), a five-point Complex Indicator of Difficulty of (TLE) Procedure (CID-TLEP) scale was developed. Two or more points on the CID-TLEP scale indicate a higher level of procedure complexity. (3) Results: Patient age below 51 years at first CIED implantation, number of abandoned leads, number of previous procedures, passive fixation and multiple leads to be extracted, and a ratio of dwell time of oldest lead to patient age during TLE of >0.13 are significant predictors of higher levels of lead extraction complexity. The ROC analysis demonstrates that a point total (being the sum of the odds ratios of the above variables) of >9.697 indicates a 21.83% higher probability of complex TLE (sensitivity 74.08%, specificity 74.46%). Finally, a logistic function was calculated, and we constructed a simple equation for lead extraction complexity that can predict the probability of a difficult procedure. The risk of complex extraction (as a percentage) is calculated as [1/(1 + 55.34 · 0.754X)] · 100 (p < 0.001). (4) Conclusion: The LECOM score can effectively predict the risk of a difficult transvenous lead extraction procedure, and predicting the probability of a more complex procedure may help clinicians in planning lead removal and improving patient management.

Impact of fixation mechanism and helix retraction status on right ventricular lead extraction

BackgroundThe impact of lead fixation mechanism on extractability is poorly characterized. ObjectiveWe aimed to compare the technical difficulty of transvenous lead extraction (TLE) of active vs passive fixation right ventricular (RV) leads. MethodsA total of 408 patients who underwent RV TLE by a single expert electrophysiologist at Oregon Health & Science University between October 2011 and June 2022 were identified and retrospectively analyzed; 331 (81%) had active fixation RV leads and 77 (19%) had passive fixation RV leads. The active fixation cohort was further stratified into those with successfully retracted helices (n = 181) and failed helix retraction (n = 109). A numerical system (0–9) devised using 6 procedural criteria quantified a technical extraction score (TES) for each RV TLE. The TES was compared between groups. ResultsHelix retraction was successful in ≥55% of active fixation TLEs. The mean TES for active-helix retracted, active-helix non-retracted, and passive fixation groups was 1.8, 3.5, and 3.7, respectively. The TES of the active-helix retracted group was significantly lower than those of the active-helix non-retracted group (adjusted P < .01) and the passive fixation group (adjusted P < .01). There was no significant difference in TES between the passive fixation and active-helix non-retracted groups in multivariate analysis (P = .18). The TLE success rate of the entire cohort was >97%, with a major complication rate of 0.5%. ConclusionTLE of active fixation leads where helical retraction is achieved presents fewer technical challenges than does passive fixation RV lead extraction; however, if the helix cannot be retracted, active and passive TLE procedures present similar technical challenges.

Changes in vestibular-related responses to combined noisy galvanic vestibular stimulation and cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation.

Vestibular nuclei and cerebellar function comprise vestibular neural networks that control vestibular-related responses. However, the vestibular-related responses to simultaneous stimulation of these regions are unclear. This study aimed to examine whether the combination of noisy galvanic vestibular stimulation (nGVS) and cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation (ctDCS) using a complex transcranial electrical stimulation device alters vestibular-dominant standing stability and vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) function. The center of foot pressure (COP) sway and VOR of participants (28 healthy, young adults) were assessed under four conditions of transcranial electrical stimulation using nGVS and ctDCS. The COP was calculated with the participant standing on a soft-foam surface with eyes closed using a force plate to evaluate body sway. VOR measurements were collected via passive head movements and fixation on a target projected onto the front wall using a video head impulse test (vHIT). VOR gain was calculated in six directions using a semicircular canal structure based on the ratio of eye movement to head movement. The nGVS + ctDCS and nGVS + sham ctDCS conditions decreased COP sway compared to the sham nGVS + ctDCS and sham nGVS + sham ctDCS conditions. No significant differences were observed in the main effect of stimulation or the interaction of stimulation and direction on the vHIT parameters. The results of this study suggest that postural stability may be independently affected by nGVS. Our findings contribute to the basic neurological foundation for the clinical application of neurorehabilitation using transcranial electrical stimulation of the vestibular system.

Effective and safe long-term transvenous extraction of the novel active fixation coronary sinus lead

Active fixation systems for leads in the coronary system minimize the risk of micro and macro dislodgement. However, extracting these leads is riskier than in the case of leads of passive fixation. This was confirmed by the results of the extraction of Medtronic StarFix lead. The new Medtronic 20066 Attain Stability lead was designed to combine the stability of fixation with the feasibility of extraction. In our report, we present the case of extraction of 36th month Medtronic 20066 Attain Stability lead. The lead was safely and entirely extracted with simple traction after securing with a locking stylet without visible damage to either the fixating mechanism or coronary veins. Our experience suggests that extraction of the Medtronic 20066 Attain Stability lead even after relatively long dwelling time seems to be substantially simpler and safer than the extraction of Medtronic StarFix lead.

Transvenous lead extraction, factors affecting procedural difficulty

Background A complex transvenous lead extraction (TLE) procedure could be associated with lower success and higher complication rates in inexperienced hands. In this study, we aim to assess the factors that determine procedural difficulty in TLE. Methods We retrospectively studied 200 consecutive patients undergoing TLE in a single referral centre from June 2020 to December 2021. Lead extraction difficulty was assessed by the success of simple manual traction with or without a locking stylet, the need for advanced extraction tools and the number of tools required to extract the lead. Logistic and linear regression analyses were used to determine the factors independently affecting these 3 parameters. Results 363 leads were extracted from 200 patients (79% males, mean age 66.85 years). The indication for TLE was device-related infection in 51.5%. Multivariate analysis revealed the lead indwelling time to be the only factor affecting the 3 parameters of difficulty. Passive fixation leads and dual coil leads increased procedural difficulty by affecting 2 parameters each. Factors that affected one parameter included infected leads, coronary sinus leads, older age of the patient and a history of valvular heart disease, all associated with a simpler procedure. Right ventricular leads were associated with a more complex one. Conclusion The most important factor that increased TLE procedural difficulty was a longer lead indwelling time, followed by passive fixation and dual-coil leads. Other contributing factors were the presence of infection, coronary sinus leads, older patients, a history of valvular heart disease and right ventricular leads.

Impact of right ventricular lead position on the outcomes of transvenous lead extraction

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background Transvenous lead extraction of apically positioned right ventricular (RV) leads could be more challenging compared to septal leads, however there is no scientific evidence regarding this issue. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of the RV lead position on extraction outcomes. Methods Data from consecutive patients undergoing transvenous lead extraction between 2014 and 2022 were retrospectively analysed. Extracted RV leads were divided into apical and non-apical groups, according to the preoperative chest X-ray images. Complete success rate of lead extraction was compared between the two groups. Results A total of 197 patients (mean age 65±14 years, 73,6% male, mean EF 50%) underwent transvenous lead extraction of 408 leads due to pocket infection (n=132, 67%), endocarditis (n=40, 20%), or non-infectious indications (n=25, 13%). 218/408 (53%) leads were right ventricular, of which 142 (65%) were extracted from an apical and 42 (19%) from a non-apical position, respectively. 34 cases (16%) with RV leads in both locations or RV leads previously pulled back from the right ventricle were excluded. There was no significant difference in the ratio of ICD leads or dual-coils between the two groups, however apical electrodes were older and had more frequently passive fixation compared to non-apical RV leads. Locking stylets, powered sheaths or snare technique were used in 88%, 82% and 30%, respectively, without any significant difference between the two groups. The complete success rate of lead extraction was higher in the non-apical group compared to apical leads (97,7% vs. 83,2%) (Odds Ratio (OR) 0,12; 95% CI 0,16-0,92; p=0,04). After adjustment for typical risk factors of extraction failure (i.e. age of leads, ICD leads, dual-coils, passive fixation) the difference become non-significant (adjusted OR 0,24; 95% CI 0,03-2,08; p=0,19). Conclusion In this single-centre, high-risk patient cohort we found better success rate of RV lead extraction from non-apical positions compared to apical leads, without statistically significant difference on multivariate analysis. Our results are hypothesis generating, and call for further research evaluating the impact of the RV lead position on extraction outcomes with larger patient populations.

P190 TWIDDLER’S SYNDROME IN A 96–YEAR–OLD PATIENT TREATED BY REPOSITIONING THE VENTRICULAR LEAD

Abstract A 96–years–old woman was admitted to our cardiological intensive care unit in December 2022 with atrioventricular dissociation, with a junctional ventricular escape rhythm at a rate of 38 beats per minute, and an atrial rhythm dissociated from the ventricular rhythm, at a rate of 80 beats per minute (Figure 1). The patient had a history of third–degree atrioventricular block, effectively treated with single–chamber pacemaker implantation (Assurity MRI SR, Abbott), operation performed approximately 10 months before access, in February 2022. The patient underwent a chest X–ray, which showed "coiling" of the ventricular catheter in the pacemaker pocket area (left subclavicular), with macroscopic dislocation of the ventricular electrode, which had its distal tip in the right atrium (Figure 2). Therefore, the clinical case was typical of Twiddler‘s syndrome. The patient would therefore have undergone revision surgery. An attempt was made to reposition the original lead, with passive fixation (Isoflex 1948/58, Abbott), by inserting a "straight" stylet, a procedure which was done effectively. The ventricular lead was repositioned in the right ventricular apex. The detected parameters were optimal (sensing 7 mV, ventricular barrier threshold 0.5 mV/0.4 ms, impedance 797 Ohm). The result was considered acceptable. The remainder of the hospital stay was without complications. The patient was discharged on the fifth day in good general condition. Twiddler syndrome is defined as a dislocation of one or more catheters, resulting in the catheters "coiling" in the pocket of the device. It is usually related to the manipulation of the generator by the patient itself. It usually occurs within a year of implantation and is usually more common in females, the elderly, the obese, pediatric patients, or patients with psychiatric disorders. The identification of patients at risk for this pathology, the adequate education of the patient and family regarding the management of the device, the use of catheters with active fixation, as well as the fixation of the generator device to the pectoral muscle, through non–absorbable sutures. In the case described, the patient denied manipulation of the device, which however could not be excluded, given the age of the patient.