Partial Pancreaticoduodenectomy Research Articles

Serum amylase on postoperative day 1 is superior to serum lipase in predicting clinically relevant pancreatic fistula after partial pancreaticoduodenectomy.

To compare the predictive value of serum amylase and lipase regarding the occurrence of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (cr-POPF) after partial pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). Data from 228 consecutive patients undergoing PD were obtained from a prospective database. Serum amylase and lipase were measured on postoperative days (PODs) 0-2. Receiver-operating characteristics analysis was performed and cutoff values were tested using logistic regression. Serum amylase had a larger area under the curve (AUC) on POD1 (AUC 0.89, p <0.001) than serum lipase. For serum amylase POD 1, a cutoff value of 70 U/l showed sensitivity and specificity of 100% and 70% for the diagnosis of cr-POPF. Serum amylase POD 1 > 70 U/l (OR 9.815, 95% CI 3.683-26.152, p < 0.001), drain amylase POD 1 > 300 U/l (OR 2.777, 95% CI 1.071-7.197, p= 0.036), and a small (≤ 3mm) pancreatic duct diameter (OR 3.705, 95% CI 1.426-9.627, p= 0.007) were significant predictors of cr-POPF in the multivariable analysis. Patients were divided into three risk groups based on serum amylase POD 1 and pancreatic duct diameter. This model had a good performance in discriminating cr-POPF (AUC 0.846, 95% CI 0.793-0.898). The sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive value for the combination of serum amylase POD 1 <70 U/l and pancreatic duct diameter >3 mm were 100%, 70%, and 100%. Serum amylase POD 1 was superior to serum lipase in predicting cr-POPF after PD. The proposed risk prediction model had a sensitivity and negative predictive value of 100%, allowing for early identification of cr-POPF.

Education Team Time Out in Oncologic Visceral Surgery Optimizes Surgical Resident Training and Team Communication–Results of a Prospective Trial

Surgical education is highly dependent on intraoperative communication. Trainers must know the trainee's training level to ensure high-quality surgical training. A systematic preoperative dialogue (Educational Team Time Out, ETO) was established to discuss the steps of each surgical procedure. Over 6 months, ETO was performed within a time limit of 3 minutes. Digital surveys on the utility of ETO and its impact on performance were conducted immediately after surgery and at the end of the study period among the staff of the participating disciplines (trainer, trainee, surgical nursing staff, anaesthesiologists, and medical students). The number of surgical substeps performed was recorded and compared with the equivalent period one year earlier. ETO was performed in 64 of the 103 eligible operations (62%). Liver resection (n = 37) was the most frequent procedure, followed by left-sided colorectal surgery (n = 12), partial pancreaticoduodenectomy (n = 6), right-sided hemicolectomies (n = 5), and thyroidectomies (n = 4). Anaesthesiologists most frequently reported that ETO had a direct impact on their work during surgery (90.9%). The influence scores were 46.8% for trainees, 8.8% for trainers, 53.3% for surgical nursing staff and 66.6% for medical students. During the implementation of ETO, a trend towards more assisted substeps in oncologic visceral surgery was seen compared to the corresponding period one year earlier (51% vs.40%; p = 0.11). ETO leads to improved intraoperative communication and more performed substeps during complex procedures, which increases motivation and practical training. This concept can easily be implemented in all surgical specialties to improve surgical education.

Clinical Implications of Postoperative Hyperamylasemia after Partial Pancreaticoduodenectomy

Introduction: The present study aimed to examine the clinical implications of postoperative hyperamylasemia (POH) after partial pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). Methods: Data from all consecutive patients undergoing PD were obtained from a prospectively maintained database and reviewed. POH was defined as an elevation of serum pancreatic amylase above the upper limit of normal (53 U/L) on postoperative days 0–2. Clinically relevant POH (cr-POH) was defined as POH in patients with clinically relevant (Clavien-Dindo ≥ III) postoperative complications. Results: POH occurred in 61 of 170 (35.9%) and cr-POH in 24 of 170 (14.1%) patients. Patients with POH had higher rates of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (cr-POPF) (44.3 vs. 3.7%, p < 0.001) and clinically relevant postoperative complications than those without POH (39.3 vs. 21.1%, p = 0.001). Patients with cr-POH had higher C-reactive protein (CRP, milligrams per liter) levels on third (257.7 vs. 187.85 mg/L, p = 0.016) and fourth (222.5 vs. 151, p = 0.002) postoperative day (POD) than those with POH alone. Serum procalcitonin (PCT, micrograms per liter) levels on POD 2 (1.2 vs. 0.4 μg/L, p = 0.028) and POD 3 (0.85 vs. 0.4 μg/L, p = 0.001) were also higher in patients with cr-POH. Rates of cr-POPF in patients with cr-POH were higher than in those with POH alone (70.8 vs. 27%, p = 0.001). POH (OR 0.011, 95% CI: 0.001–0.097, p < 0.001) was an independent predictor of cr-POPF in the multivariable analysis. A high-risk pathology, defined as nonadenocarcinoma/nonchronic pancreatitis pathology (OR 0.277, 95% CI: 0.106–0.727, p = 0.009), and a small duct diameter (OR 0.333, 95% CI: 0.139–0.796, p = 0.013) were independent predictors of POH in the multivariable analysis. Conclusion: POH is a frequent, but not always clinically relevant, finding after partial PD. Serum CRP and PCT levels in the early postoperative period can be used to identify patients with cr-POH. POH is an independent risk factor for increased postoperative morbidity, including cr-POPF, after partial PD.

Systematic review on the use and management of drainages in pancreatic surgery

Abstract Objective The use of drains in pancreatic surgery, both in distal pancreatectomy (DP) and partial pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is controversial. The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the potential benefit of drainage use in pancreatic surgery on postoperative outcomes. Methods A systematic literature search was performed in MEDLINE, Web of Science and CENTRAL. All RCTs investigating the use and management of any drainage in patients undergoing pancreatectomy were included. Data on mortality, postoperative complications and length of hospital stay (LOS) were analysed. A random-effects model for Mantel-Haenzsel and inverse variance analysis was used. Cochrane RoB 2.0 tool and GRADE approach was used for assessment of risk of bias and certainty of evidence. Results Ten RCTs investigating drainage vs no drainage, timing of drainage removal or type of drainage in PD such as DP with a total of 2004 patients were included. Drainage vs no drainage: Three RCTs (two with PD and DP, one with PD only). Neither mortality (OR 1.57, 95%-CI: 0.62 to 3.93 p=0.34) nor overall complications (OR 0.88, 95%-CI: 0.71 to 1.08, p=0.21) differed between both groups (certainty of evidence: low). However, one trial was stopped prematurely because of higher 90-day mortality in the no drainage group. Early vs late drainage removal: Four RCTs (two with PD and DP, two with PD only). Early drain removal resulted in both a significant reduction of chyle leak (OR 0.22, 95%-CI: 0.06 to 0.59, p&amp;lt;0.01) as well as a shortening of LOS (mean difference -2.64 days, 95%CI: -4.63 to -0.65, p&amp;lt;0.01). For both outcomes the certainty of evidence was moderate. Mortality, postoperative pancreatic fistula and hemorrhage showed no difference between early vs late drainage removal (certainty of evidence: low). Active vs passive drainage: Three RCTs (one with PD and DP, two with PD only). None of the studies found any significant difference in outcome with regard to the type of drainage. Conclusion There is no evidence that drainages after pancreatic surgery should be standard of care. However, there is also no evidence that placing a drain leads to worse outcomes. If a drainage is used it should be removed early to avoid chyle leak and accelerate hospital discharge.

How does antecolic reconstruction compare with retrocolic reconstruction after partial pancreaticoduodenectomy?

How does antecolic reconstruction compare with retrocolic reconstruction after partial pancreaticoduodenectomy?

Protocol of a prospective study investigating the association of PAncreatic parenchymal RISk factors with postoperative pancreatic fistula after partial pancreaticoduodenectomy (PARIS trial)

IntroductionPartial pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) is the treatment of choice for many malignant and benign diseases of the pancreatic head. Postoperative complication rates of up to 40% are regularly reported. One of...

Intraoperative endoluminal pyloromyotomy as a novel approach to reduce delayed gastric emptying after pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy – a retrospective study

Background: One of the most common complications after partial pancreaticoduodenectomy or pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy is the delayed gastric emptying, which is associated with a reduction of quality of life, longer hospital stay and higher costs. The aim of this retrospective study, was to assess whether an intraoperative endoluminal pyloromyotomy during pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy prior to the duodenojejunostomy reduces the rate of delayed gastric emptying. Another objective of this study, was to proof the safety of this operation technique, through analyzing the rate of postoperative complications, delayed gastric emptying grades, duration of hospital stay and postoperative mortality.

Intraoperative endoluminal pyloromyotomy for reduction of delayed gastric emptying after pylorus preserving partial pancreaticoduodenectomy (PORRIDGE trial): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

BackgroundPylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (ppPD) is a standard surgical procedure for the treatment of resectable neoplasms of the periampullary region. One of the most common postoperative complications after ppPD is delayed gastric emptying (DGE) which reduces quality of life, prevents a timely return to a solid oral diet and prolongs the length of hospital stay. In a retrospective analysis, intraoperative endoluminal pyloromyotomy was associated with a reduced rate of DGE. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of intraoperative endoluminal pyloromyotomy on postoperative DGE after ppPD in a randomised and controlled setting.MethodsThis randomised trial features parallel group design with a 1:1 allocation ratio and a superiority hypothesis. Patients with a minimum age of 18 years and an indication for ppPD are eligible to participate in this study and will be randomised intraoperatively to receive either endoluminal pyloromyotomy or atraumatic stretching of the pylorus. The sample size calculation (n=64 per study arm) is based on retrospective data. The primary endpoint is the rate of DGE within 30 days. Secondary endpoints are quality of life, operation time, estimated blood loss, length of hospital stay, morbidity and mortality.DiscussionDGE after ppPD is a common complication with an incomplete understood aetiology. Prevention of DGE could improve outcomes and enhance quality of life after one of the most common procedures in pancreatic surgery. This trial will expand the existing evidence on intraoperative pyloromyotomy, and the results will provide additional data on a simple surgical technique that could reduce the incidence of postoperative DGE.Trial registrationGerman Clinical Trials RegisterDRKS00013503. Registered on 27 December 2017.

Antecolic versus retrocolic reconstruction after partial pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Pancreatic cancer remains one of the five leading causes of cancer deaths in industrialised nations. For adenocarcinomas in the head of the gland and premalignant lesions, partial pancreaticoduodenectomy represents the standard treatment for resectable tumours. The gastro- or duodenojejunostomy after partial pancreaticoduodenectomy can be reestablished via either an antecolic or retrocolic route. The debate about the more favourable technique for bowel reconstruction is ongoing. To compare the effectiveness and safety of antecolic and retrocolic gastro- or duodenojejunostomy after partial pancreaticoduodenectomy. In this updated version, we conducted a systematic literature search up to 6 July 2021 to identify all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), the Cochrane Library 2021, Issue 6, MEDLINE (1946 to 6 July 2021), and Embase (1974 to 6 July 2021). We applied no language restrictions. We handsearched reference lists of identified trials to identify further relevant trials, and searched the trial registries clinicaltrials.govand World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform for ongoing trials. We considered all RCTs comparing antecolic with retrocolic reconstruction of bowel continuity after partial pancreaticoduodenectomy for any given indication to be eligible. Two review authors independently screened the identified references and extracted data from the included trials. The same two review authors independently assessed risk of bias of included trials, according to standard Cochrane methodology. We used a random-effects model to pool the results of the individual trials in a meta-analysis. We used odds ratios (OR) to compare binary outcomes and mean differences (MD) for continuous outcomes. Of a total of 287 citations identified by the systematic literature search, we included eight randomised controlled trials (reported in 11 publications), with a total of 818 participants. There was high risk of bias in all of the trials in regard to blinding of participants and/or outcome assessors and unclear risk for selective reporting in six of the trials. There was little or no difference in the frequency of delayed gastric emptying (OR 0.67; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.41 to 1.09; eight trials, 818 participants, low-certainty evidence) with relevant heterogeneity between trials (I2=40%). There was little or no difference in postoperative mortality (risk difference (RD) -0.00; 95% CI -0.02 to 0.01; eight trials, 818 participants, high-certainty evidence); postoperative pancreatic fistula (OR 1.01; 95% CI 0.73 to 1.40; eight trials, 818 participants, low-certainty evidence); postoperative haemorrhage (OR 0.87; 95% CI 0.47 to 1.59; six trials, 742 participants, low-certainty evidence); intra-abdominal abscess (OR 1.11; 95% CI 0.71 to 1.74; seven trials, 788 participants, low-certainty evidence); bile leakage (OR 0.82; 95% CI 0.35 to 1.91; seven trials, 606 participants, low-certainty evidence); reoperation rate (OR 0.68; 95% CI 0.34 to 1.36; five trials, 682 participants, low-certainty evidence); and length of hospital stay (MD -0.21; 95% CI -1.41 to 0.99; eight trials, 818 participants, low-certainty evidence). Only one trial reported quality of life, on a subgroup of 73 participants, also without a relevant difference between the two groups at any time point. The overall certainty of the evidence was low to moderate, due to some degree of heterogeneity, inconsistency and risk of bias in the included trials. There was low- to moderate-certainty evidence suggesting that antecolic reconstruction after partial pancreaticoduodenectomy results in little to no difference in morbidity, mortality, length of hospital stay, or quality of life. Due to heterogeneity in definitions of the endpoints between trials, and differences in postoperative management, future research should be based on clearly defined endpoints and standardised perioperative management, to potentially elucidate differences between these two procedures. Novel strategies should be evaluated for prophylaxis and treatment of common complications, such as delayed gastric emptying.

Gallbladder carcinoma and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

Gallbladder carcinoma and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma Abstract. In this article, we focus on three entities of malignant biliary tumors: gallbladder carcinoma, distal and perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. Those are rare malignant tumors which require an extensive interdisciplinary expertise in the treatment of hepato-pancreato-biliary conditions in order to provide an appropriate diagnostic work-up, correctly assess resectability and come up with a clear-cut multimodal treatment plan. Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (Klatskin-tumour) usually requires the most complex evaluation of resectability, which involves not only the assessment of vascular in- and outflow and an adequate biliary drainage, but also aims to ensure that enough functional liver tissue is left after resection. To this end, preoperative portal vein embolization may be used to increase the size the future liver remnant. In highly selected, unresectable cases of perihilar cholangiocarinoma, or if a primary sclerosing cholangitis is present, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by liver transplantation can be evaluated as a curative option. Distal cholangiocarcinomas usually are treated by a partial pancreaticoduodenectomy (Whipple operation). The surgical treatment of gallbladder cancer ranges from simple cholecystectomy to major liver resection with complex biliary and vascular reconstruction, dependent on tumour stage. The surgical treatment is usually followed by an adjuvant regimen of Capecitabine which can significantly improve survival, while a combination Cisplatin and Gemcitabine is used in the palliative setting.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy vs. ERCP for preoperative biliary drainage in patients undergoing pancreatic resection

Abstract Objective Preoperative bile drainage in patients with obstructive jaundice due to pancreatic head malignancy is needed, if pancreatic head resection cannot be performed in a timely fashion. The safety and efficacy of ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy (HGS) as an alternative to the established endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography (ERCP) with stent placement needs further investigation. Methods Clinicopathological data of patients who underwent partial or total pancreaticoduodenectomy between January 2017 and December 2019 in a major swiss hepatopancreatobiliary center were assessed. We compared the HGS with ERCP/stent regarding the kinetics of bilirubin decrease, the procedure-related morbidity, and the postoperative surgical outcomes. Results During the study period, 102 patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy or total pancreatectomy for pancreatic malignancy. Preoperative bile drainage was performed in 65 patients (20 HGS, 45 ERCP). HGS was associated with a faster (6 vs. 10 days, P = 0.042) and more effective (133 µmol/L vs. 101 µmol/L, P = 0.037) reduction of the serum bilirubin levels. HGS was safe and did not differ from ERCP with stent placement concerning post-interventional complications (P = 0.565), postoperative mortality (P = 0.996) and postoperative morbidity (P = 0.896), including infectious complications (wound infection, P = 0.662/ intra-abdominal abscess, P = 0.587), severe pancreatic fistula (P = 0.587), bile leak (P = 0.131), and postoperative hemorrhage (P = 0.886). Conclusion HGS performed in a specialized multidisciplinary hepatopancreatobiliary center is feasible and safe and may result in more accelerated and effective bile drainage compared to the established ERCP. In patients with obstructive jaundice related to pancreatic malignancy unable to undergo adequate bile drainage by ERCP, HGS may be an effective alternative method enabling surgery in a timely manner.

Extended lymph node resection versus standard resection for pancreatic and periampullary adenocarcinoma.

Pancreatic and periampullary adenocarcinomas account for some of the most aggressive malignancies, and the leading causes of cancer-related mortalities. Partial pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) with negative resection margins is the only potentially curative therapy. The high prevalence of lymph node metastases has led to the hypothesis that wider excision with the removal of more lymphatic tissue could result in an improvement of survival, and higher rates of negative resection margins. To compare overall survival following standard (SLA) versus extended lymph lymphadenectomy (ELA) for pancreatic head and periampullary adenocarcinoma. We also compared secondary outcomes, such as morbidity, mortality, and tumour involvement of the resection margins between the two procedures. We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, PubMed, and Embase from 1973 to September 2020; we applied no language restrictions. Randomised controlled trials (RCT) comparing PD with SLA versus PD with ELA, including participants with pancreatic head and periampullary adenocarcinoma. Two review authors independently screened references and extracted data from study reports. We calculated pooled risk ratios (RR) for most binary outcomes except for postoperative mortality, for which we estimated a Peto odds ratio (Peto OR), and mean differences (MD) for continuous outcomes. We used a fixed-effect model in the absence of substantial heterogeneity (I² < 25%), and a random-effects model in cases of substantial heterogeneity (I² > 25%). Two review authors independently assessed risk of bias, and we used GRADE to assess the quality of the evidence for important outcomes. We included seven studies with 843 participants (421 ELA and 422 SLA). All seven studies included Kaplan-Meier curves for overall survival. There was little or no difference in survival between groups (log hazard ratio (log HR) 0.12, 95% confidence interval (CI) -3.06 to 3.31; P = 0.94; seven studies, 843 participants; very low-quality evidence). There was little or no difference in postoperative mortality between the groups (Peto odds ratio (OR) 1.20, 95% CI 0.51 to 2.80; seven studies, 843 participants; low-quality evidence). Operating time was probably longer for ELA (mean difference (MD) 50.13 minutes, 95% CI 19.19 to 81.06 minutes; five studies, 670 participants; moderate-quality evidence). There was substantial heterogeneity between the studies (I² = 88%; P < 0.00001). There may have been more blood loss during ELA (MD 137.43 mL, 95% CI 11.55 to 263.30 mL; two studies, 463 participants; very low-quality evidence). There was substantial heterogeneity between the studies (I² = 81%, P = 0.02). There may have been more lymph nodes retrieved during ELA (MD 11.09 nodes, 95% CI 7.16 to 15.02; five studies, 670 participants; moderate-quality evidence). There was substantial heterogeneity between the studies (I² = 81%, P < 0.00001). There was little or no difference in the incidence of positive resection margins between groups (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.58 to 1.13; six studies, 783 participants; very low-quality evidence). There is no evidence of an impact on survival with extended versus standard lymph node resection. However, the operating time may have been longer and blood loss greater in the extended resection group. In conclusion, current evidence neither supports nor refutes the effect of extended lymph lymphadenectomy in people with adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas.

Intraoperative endoluminal pyloromyotomy as a novel approach to reduce delayed gastric emptying after pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy\u2014a retrospective study

BackgroundDelayed gastric emptying (DGE) is one of the most common complications after pylorus-preserving partial pancreaticoduodenectomy (ppPD). The aim of this retrospective study was to assess whether an intraoperative pyloromyotomy during ppPD prior to the creation of duodenojejunostomy reduces DGE.MethodsPatients who underwent pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy between January 2015 and December 2017 were divided into two groups on the basis of whether an intraoperative pyloromyotomy was performed (pyloromyotomy (PM) group) or not (no pyloromyotomy (NP) group). The primary endpoint was DGE according to the ISGPS definition. The confirmatory analysis of the primary endpoint was performed with multivariate analysis.ResultsOne hundred and ten patients were included in the statistical analysis. Pyloromyotomy was performed in 44 of 110 (40%) cases. DGE of any grade was present in 62 patients (56.4%). The DGE rate was lower in the PM group (40.9%) compared with the NP group (66.7%), and pyloromyotomy was associated with a reduced risk for DGE in univariate (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.16–0.76; P = 0.008) and multivariate analyses (OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.13–0.77; P = 0.011). The presence of an intra-abdominal complication was an independent risk factor for DGE in the multivariate analysis (OR 5.54, 95% CI 2.00–15.36; P = 0.001).ConclusionIntraoperative endoluminal pyloromyotomy during ppPD was associated with a reduced risk for DGE in this retrospective study. Pyloromyotomy should be considered a simple technique that can potentially reduce DGE rates after ppPD.

The relationship between cholecystokinin secretion and pancreatic [11C]methionine uptake in patients after partial pancreaticoduodenectomy.

The pancreatic uptake of [11C]methionine ([11C]MET) is associated with beta-cell function and insulin secretion, but [11C]MET uptake and its relationship with exocrine pancreatic performance are less well studied. The postprandial release of cholecystokinin (CCK) depends on gastric emptying velocity and triggers exocrine pancreas secretion. Therefore, we assumed that high postprandial CCK concentrations stimulate the uptake of [11C]MET in the residual pancreas following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Nineteen tumor-free patients after pancreaticoduodenectomy (median age: 64; 25/75 quantile: 56-67years); ten males, nine females and ten healthy controls (median age: 24; 25/75 quantile: 23.8-26years) were given a mixed meal. Plasma CCK, insulin and glucose concentrations were measured before and at 10, 20, 30, 60, 90, 150 and 180min after ingestion. Simultaneously, 800MBq of [11C]MET were administered and the activity [maximum tissue standardized uptake values (SUVmax)] over the pancreas was measured using PET-CT at 15, 30 and 60min after injection. Integrated CCK (AUC30) correlated with SUVmax (AUC60, R2 = 0.45, p value = 0.0013). Multivariate analysis revealed postprandial insulin (AUC60) and CCK concentrations and young age as significant independent predictors of [11C] methionine uptake. The association between CCK concentrations and pancreatic [11C]MET uptake might indicate a causal relationship. Further research should assess whether [11C]MET uptake could serve as a less invasive tool to assess exocrine pancreas activity.

Preoperative Bacterobilia Is an Independent Risk Factor of SSIs after Partial PD

Introduction: The impact of bacterobilia on postoperative surgical and infectious complications after partial pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is still a matter of debate. Methods: All patients undergoing PD with and without a preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) with complete information regarding microbial bile colonization were included. Logistic regression was applied to assess the influence of bacterobilia on postoperative outcome. Results: One hundred seventy patients were retrospectively analysed. Clinically relevant postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ III) occurred in 40 (23.5%) patients, clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistulas in 29 (17.1%) patients, and surgical site infections (SSIs) in 16 (9.4%) patients. Thirty-seven of 39 (94.9%) patients with PBD and 33 of 131 (25.2%) patients without PBD had positive bile cultures (p < 0.001). A polymicrobial bile colonization was reported in 9 of 33 (27.3%) patients without PBD and 27 of 37 (73%) patients with PBD (p < 0.001). Resistance to ampicillin-sulbactam was shown in 26 of 37 (70.3%) patients with PBD and 12 of 33 (36.4%) patients without PBD (p = 0.001). PBD (OR 0.015, 95% CI 0.003–0.07, p < 0.001) and male sex (OR 3.286, 95% CI 1.441–7.492, p = 0.005) were independent predictors of bacterobilia in the multivariable analysis. Bacterobilia was the only independent predictor of SSIs in the multivariable analysis (OR 0.143, 95% CI 0.038–0.535, p = 0.004). Conclusions: Patients with a PBD show significantly higher rates of bacterobilia, polymicrobial bile colonization, and resistance to ampicillin-sulbactam. Bacterobilia is an independent predictor of SSI after PD.

C-reactive protein and drain amylase accurately predict clinically relevant pancreatic fistula after partial pancreaticoduodenectomy.

C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT) have shown to be reliable predictors of inflammatory complications and anastomotic leak after colorectal surgery. Their predictive value after partial pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) remains unclear. All consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies (2009-2018) at our hospital were included. Drain amylase was evaluated on postoperative day (POD) 1, serum CRP and PCT were evaluated on POD 1-3. Receiver-operating characteristics curves were performed and significant cut-off values were tested using logistic regression. Among 188 patients who underwent partial PD, clinically relevant pancreatic fistulas (POPF) occurred in 30 (16%) patients, including 20 (10.6%) with Grade B and 10 (5.3%) patients with Grade C. Postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo≥III) were reported in 46 (24.5%) patients, including Grade IIIa in 16 (8.5%), IIIb in 18 (9.6%), IVa in 3 (1.6%), IVb in 2 (1.1%) and V in 7 (3.7%) patients. Drain amylase on POD 1 showed the largest area under the curve (0.872, p < 0.001), followed by CRP (0.803, p < 0.001) and PCT on POD 3 (0.651, p < 0.011). Drain amylase on POD 1>303 U/l (OR 0.045, 95% CI 0.010-0.195, p<0.001), CRP>203mg/l (OR 0.098, 95% CI 0.041-0.235, p<0.001) and PCT>0.85μg/l (OR 0.393, 95%CI 0.178-0.869, p=0.02) were significant predictors of relevant POPF in the univariate analysis. CRP > 203 mg/l (OR 0.098, 95% CI 0.024-0.403, p = 0.001) and drain amylase > 303 U/l (OR 0.064, 95% CI 0.007-0.554, p = 0.01) remained independent predictors in the multivariable analysis. The combination of drain amylase on POD 1 and CRP on POD 3 had a sensitivity and specificity of 87.4% and 90.9% to predict relevant POPF. Drain amylase on POD 1 and CRP on POD 3 can accurately predict clinically relevant POPF after partial pancreaticoduodenectomy. The accuracy of PCT on POD 3 is limited.

Fluconazole treatment in severe ectopic Cushing syndrome

SummarySevere Cushing syndrome (SCS) is considered an emergency that requires immediate treatment to lower serum cortisol levels. Fluconazole may be considered an alternative treatment in Cushing syndrome when ketoconazole is not tolerated or unavailable. We report a 39-year-old woman with a history of partial pancreaticoduodenectomy due to a periampullary neuroendocrine tumor with locoregional extension. Three years after surgery, she developed liver metastases and was started on 120 mg of lanreotide/month, despite which, liver metastases progressed in the following 6 months. The patient showed extreme fatigue, muscle weakness, delirium, moon face, hirsutism and severe proximal weakness. Laboratory tests showed anemia, hyperglycemia and severe hypokalemia. 24-h urinary free cortisol: 2152 nmol/day (reference range (RR): <276), morning serum cortisol 4883.4 nmol/L (RR: 138–690), ACTH 127.3 pmol/L (RR: 2.2–10). She was diagnosed with ectopic ACTH syndrome (EAS). On admission, she presented with acute upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding and hemodynamic instability. Intravenous fluconazole 400 mg/day was started. After 48 h, her mental state improved and morning cortisol decreased by 25%. The dose was titrated to 600 mg/day which resulted in a 55% decrease in cortisol levels in 1 week, but then had to be decreased to 400 mg/day because transaminase levels increased over 3 times the upper normal level. After 18 days of treatment, hemodynamic stability, lower cortisol levels and better overall clinical status enabled successful bilateral adrenalectomy. This case report shows that intravenous fluconazole effectively decreased cortisol levels in SCS due to EAS.Learning points:Severe Cushing syndrome can be effectively treated with fluconazole to achieve a significant improvement of hypercortisolism prior to bilateral adrenalectomy.Intravenous fluconazole is an alternative treatment when ketoconazole is not tolerated and etomidate is not available.Fluconazole is well tolerated with mild side effects. Hepatotoxicity is usually mild and resolves after drug discontinuation.

A multicentre, prospective, randomized trial evaluating the effect of matrix-bound sealant on pancreatic fistula after partial pancreaticoduodenectomy

A multicentre, prospective, randomized trial evaluating the effect of matrix-bound sealant on pancreatic fistula after partial pancreaticoduodenectomy

Safety of Blumgart's Anastomosis During Traverso Operation is Independent of Diagnosis and Risk Factors for Pancreaticojejunal Anastomotic Failure

Background : The partial pancreaticoduodenectomy, either known as pylorus-preserving Traverso-Longmire procedure, is a sophisticated operation which is associated with a high morbidity. Morbidity is primarily caused by leakage of the pancreatic anastomosis with its consecutive complications like fistula. We investigated the safety of the Blumgart´s anastomosis during Traverso operation and analysed well-established risk factors regarding an association to pancreatic anastomotic failure. Methods : In this retrospective study we included 133 consecutive patients, who underwent a Traverso-Longmire operation from 2007-2014. Analysis contained risk factors (gender, age, ASA, BMI, final diagnosis, prolonged jaundice, presurgical pancreatic duct stenting, operating room time, postoperative morbidity, length of postoperative hospital stay) hospital mortality, surgical and perioperative management. Chi-Square Test was used to analyze a statistical significance. Results : The overall pancreatic anastomotic failure rate was n=21/133 (15,8%). Most events were pancreatic leakage grade A (n=14/133; 10,5%). Grade B occurred in 5 cases (n=5/133; 3,8%), grade C occurred in 2 cases (n=2/133; 1,5%). Mortality was 1,5% (n=2/133). No suggestible or independent risk factors were detected as predictors of postoperative anastomotic failure. Conclusion : The Blumgart anastomosis during Traverso operation is a safe technique and its feasibility is independent of diagnosis and risk factors for pancreaticojejunal anastomotic failure.

A multicentre, prospective, randomized trial evaluating the effect of matrix-bound sealant on pancreatic fistula after partial pancreaticoduodenectomy

A multicentre, prospective, randomized trial evaluating the effect of matrix-bound sealant on pancreatic fistula after partial pancreaticoduodenectomy