Pars Plana Vitrectomy Group Research Articles

Post-Cataract Surgery Fungal Endophthalmitis: 6-Year Experience in Management and Outcomes at a Tertiary Eye Care Center.

This study aimed to describe the functional and anatomical outcomes of post-cataract surgery fungal endophthalmitis at King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital (KKESH). A retrospective analysis of clinical data from a single institution was performed. This study included 29 patients with post-cataract surgery endophthalmitis with suspected or confirmed fungal etiology who presented between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2022. We evaluated demographics, clinical features, microbiological assessments, and treatment strategies. The effects of various treatments on outcomes were analyzed. The need for additional treatment and functional and anatomical outcomes was also investigated. The mean time from surgery to the onset of ocular symptoms was 52.1 (SD ± 59.9; range, 3-210) days, and the mean time from surgery to the first visit to KKESH was 81.4 (SD ± 103.5; range, 2-510) days. Low culture positivity was noted in four samples, with two revealing Aspergillus sp. and two revealing Cladosporium sp. Of the 29 patients, 6 underwent pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) and received intravitreal antimicrobial/antibiotic injections. Two of the six patients also underwent simultaneous intraocular lens removal. The average number of additional treatments, regardless of visual acuity, was lower in the PPV group than in the conservative group (0.5 [SD ± 1.1; range, 0-3] and 1.48 [SD ± 1.47; range, 0-6], respectively). In the PPV group, 50% (n=3) of the eyes achieved functional success and 83.3% (n=5) of the eyes achieved anatomical success. In contrast, in the conservative group, 43.5% (n=10) of the eyes achieved functional success and 69.6% (n=16) of the eyes achieved anatomical success. For post-cataract surgery fungal endophthalmitis, a high index of suspicion and prompt PPV with empirical administration of intravitreal antifungal agents are required to achieve a favorable prognosis.

Reattachment rate with pneumatic retinopexy versus pars plana vitrectomy for single break rhegmatogenous retinal detachment

AimTo assess the primary reattachment rate (PARR) in pneumatic retinopexy (PnR) versus pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) meeting the Pneumatic Retinopexy versus Vitrectomy for the Management...

Vitrectomy versus scleral buckle for retinal detachment without posterior vitreous detachment

To compare the effectiveness and safety of scleral buckling and pars plana vitrectomy in treating retinal detachment without posterior vitreous detachment. A total of 88 eyes of 83 patients with retinal detachment without prior posterior vitreous detachment were investigated retrospectively. Group A comprised patients who underwent scleral buckling (n = 47) and Group B (n = 36) patients who were treated with pars plana vitrectomy. Anatomical success, postoperative visual acuity, and ocular adverse events were evaluated. The primary and final anatomical success rate showed a nonsignificant difference (p = 0.465 and p = 0.37 respectively). No significant difference was observed in the reoperation rate or development of epiretinal membrane between the groups (p = 0.254 and p = 0.254 respectively). However, scleral buckling resulted in significantly better visual acuity at the last follow-up (0.12 ± 0.23) compared to pars plana vitrectomy (0.37 ± 0.46, p = 0.001). The incidence of cataract progression was also significantly higher in the pars plana vitrectomy group (46%) compared to the scleral buckling group (10%, p < 0.001). Scleral buckling and pars plana vitrectomy show similar success rates in treating retinal detachment without vitreous detachment. However, due to less cataract progression and better visual acuity outcomes, scleral buckling is recommended for these cases. Determining vitreous status before surgery is crucial for optimal outcomes.

Retinal Displacement Following Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Repair.

This study aimed to report retinal displacement incidence following rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) repair with pars plana vitrectomy (PPV), scleral buckle (SB), or combined SB/PPV. A single-center, case series using Optos fundus autofluorescence (FAF) images was performed after RRD repair between April 2020 and February 2022. Retinal displacement was identified by imprinted retinal vessels on FAF imaging. One hundred ninety-four eyes were included. Ninety-seven (50.0%) eyes underwent PPV, 46 (23.7%) underwent SB, and 51 (26.3%) underwent SB/PPV. A total of 25/194 eyes (12.9%) had retinal vessel imprinting on FAF imaging consistent with retinal displacement. The SB/PPV group (9/51, 17.6%) and the PPV group (15/97, 15.5%) had significantly higher displacement rates when compared to the SB group (1/46, 2.2%; P = 0.017, P = 0.021, respectively). Retinal displacement after RRD repair is more prevalent after PPV. There was a low rate of displacement with SB. Retinal displacement was not associated with a visual acuity difference. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 2024;55:XX-XX.].

Macular perfusion, thickness, and sensitivity in phacovitrectomy versus lens-sparing vitrectomy in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment

Purpose The aim of this study was to compare phacovitrectomy (phacoPPV) to lens-sparing pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with respect to macular perfusion, thickness, and sensitivity in phakic patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Patients and methods This is a prospective, comparative, nonrandomized, interventional study that included 31 phakic eyes with primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. The patients were divided into two groups according to the preoperative lens status: group A who had significant cataract and group B who did not have significant cataract. Group A included 17 eyes for which phacoPPV was performed, while group B included 14 eyes for which lens-sparing PPV was performed. All patients were preoperatively evaluated clinically and with A-scan ultrasonography and were followed up for 4 months after surgery. Optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) and microperimetry were done at 2 and 4 months, postoperatively. Results The OCTA showed that the lens-sparing PPV was associated with significantly larger foveal avascular zone area (0.4±0.2 mm2) compared to the phacoPPV (0.2±0.1 mm2) at 2 months (P=0.048), as well as at 4 months (0.4±0.1 mm2vs. 0.2±0.1 mm2, respectively, P=0.044). However, the foveal avascular zone perimeter showed no statistically significant differences between the two groups at 2 and 4 months postoperatively. At 2 months, the deep vascular plexus (DVP) parafoveal vessel density was statistically significantly higher in the phacoPPV group (47.9±4.7%) compared to the PPV group (36.4±11.9%) (P=0.048), while at 4 months it was the DVP foveal vessel density that showed a significantly higher mean in the phacoPPV group (35.4±11.9%) compared to the PPV group (20.3±16.1%) (P=0.036). No other statistically significant intergroup differences were found with respect to other parameters for macular perfusion, and other DVP parameters. Similarly, the macular sensitivity, as well as the ganglion cell complex, and the central subfield thicknesses were comparable between the two groups. The visual outcome was also comparable at 2 and 4 months between the two groups. Conclusion PhacoPPV and lens-sparing vitrectomy were comparable with respect to OCTA, microperimetry, and visual acuity. The limited differences are too preliminary and the decision to do phacoPPV rather than lens-sparing PPV needs to be based on other determinants like the presence of preoperative lens opacity.

Factors affecting anatomical and visual outcomes in Terson syndrome managed by surgery or observation.

To investigate visual outcomes and prognostic factors of patients with Terson syndrome (TS) managed with observation or pars plana vitrectomy (PPV). retrospective review of medical records of 117 eyes from 81 patients (43 females) with TS. Main outcome measures were final best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraoperative findings and long-term sequelae. 46 (39.3%) eyes were managed conservatively and 71 (60.7%) eyes underwent PPV. Median follow-up was 8.4 months. The PPV group had significantly worse (p < 0.001) baseline BCVA (median 2.3 versus 0.7 logMAR, Snellen equivalent 20/4000 versus 20/100). Final BCVA did not differ between the two groups (p = 0.38). Final BCVA ≥ 0.3 logMAR (20/40) in the surgery group was associated with post-operative retinal detachment (p = 0.013) and macular abnormalities (p = 0.014), and in the observation group with ocular comorbidity (p = 0.008). Retinal breaks were detected intraoperatively in 25 (35.2%) eyes and were associated with an interval longer than 3 months between ocular diagnosis and surgery (p = 0.04), but not with larger gauge instrumentation and posterior vitreous detachment. Incidence of ERM did not differ among patients managed conservatively and after PPV (p = 0.9) and between eyes undergoing early or delayed surgery (p = 0.09). The most common post-operative complications were cataract in 16 (22.5%) eyes and ERM in 8 (11.3%) eyes. visual outcomes in TS are similar with both management strategies. Surgery allows faster and greater visual recovery but carries high risk of intraoperative retinal tears if delayed for longer than 3 months from initial presentation. ERM and retinal detachment are not correlated with timing of surgery or management strategy.

Comparison of complications of intrascleral fixation according to the extent of vitrectomy

BackgroundIntraocular lens (IOL) fixation is performed after intraoperative anterior or total vitrectomy. This study aimed to compare the intraoperative and postoperative complications of these two techniques.MethodsThis retrospective study included 235 eyes that underwent intrascleral fixation surgery at our hospital between July 2014 and January 2021. The eyes were classified into the anterior vitrectomy group (A-vit group; 134 eyes) and the pars plana vitrectomy group (PPV group; 101 eyes). The age, preoperative and postoperative best-corrected visual acuity, observation period, preoperative and postoperative intraocular pressure, and the incidence of intraoperative and postoperative complications were assessed.ResultsIntrascleral fixation was performed more frequently in the PPV group, and a significant difference was observed between the eyes with a history of vitrectomy and eyes with scleral buckles (p = 0.00041). In terms of the incidence of postoperative complications following intrascleral fixation, the incidence of low intraocular pressure postoperative was higher in the PPV group than that in the A-vit group, and a significant difference was observed between the two groups (p = 0.01).ConclusionsThe visual outcome and complications following intrascleral fixation did not differ according to the extent of vitreous excision.

Scleral-fixated intraocular lens implantation with "irregular, knotless, zigzag-shaped scleral tunnel suture technique" combined with pars plana vitrectomy or anterior vitrectomy.

This study aims to introduce a new suture method and report surgical outcomes of patients who underwent scleral-fixated intraocular lens (SF-IOL) implantation combined with either pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) or anterior vitrectomy (AV). Twenty-three eyes performed SF-IOL implantation combined with PPV (Group 1), and 34 eyes performed SF-IOL implantation combined with AV (Group 2) were included in the study prospectively. The SF-IOL, either polymethyl methacrylate or foldable IOL, was sutured into the sclera using PC-9 sutures in an irregular, knotless, and zigzag-shaped manner. The scleral tunnel was approximately 12-15 mm long, with at least four sharp edges. Suture tips were trimmed within the scleral tunnel. Postoperative outcomes and complications were evaluated. Both groups showed no complications such as suture tip expulsion, suture reaction, IOL dislocation, or increased intraocular pressure during postoperative visits. Group 1 exhibited a statistically significant improvement in visual acuity compared to preoperative values (P = 0.036 for the 1st month, <0.001 for the 3rd month). Similarly, Group 2 demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in visual acuity compared to the preoperative period (P = 0.001 for the 1st month, <0.001 for the 3rd month). The "irregular, knotless, and zigzag-shaped scleral tunnel suture technique" yielded favorable results in terms of IOL stability and visual acuity. This technique can be safely employed in patients undergoing SF-IOL implantation combined with PPV or AV.

Changes in optical coherence tomography biomarkers in eyes with advanced idiopathic epiretinal membrane treated with dexamethasone implantation

PurposeTo investigate the effects of vitrectomy and intravitreal dexamethasone (DEX) implantation on retinal biomarkers in patients with advanced idiopathic epiretinal membrane (IERM) and to evaluate this treatment’s anatomical and functional outcomes.MethodsThis retrospective study included 41 patients with advanced IERM who underwent vitrectomy and were divided into a pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) group (20 eyes) and a dexamethasone (DEX) group (21 eyes) based on intravitreal DEX implantation. We collected data on best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), disorganization of the retinal inner layers (DRIL), subretinal fluid, intraretinal cystoid changes (IRC), integrity of the inner-outer segment layer, and intraocular pressure.ResultsBCVA improved significantly in both groups; the DEX group had a higher visual acuity gain at 1 and 6 months (P = 0.002 and 0.023, respectively). Postoperative CMT gradually decreased in both groups, with the DEX group showing a greater decrease at 1 and 6 months (P = 0.009 and 0.033, respectively). Six months after surgery, the DRIL and IRC grades in the DEX group were significantly improved compared to those in the PPV group (P = 0.037 and 0.038, respectively). Multivariate regression analyses revealed that patients with intraoperative DEX implants were more likely to have a significant CMT reduction (≥ 100 μm) from baseline (odds ratio (OR), 9.44; 95% confidence intervals (CI), 1.58–56.56; P = 0.014) at 6 months and less likely to exhibit DRIL at 6 months postoperatively (OR, 0.08; 95% CI, 0.01–0.68; P = 0.021).ConclusionVitrectomy combined with intravitreal DEX implantation facilitates the recovery of postoperative visual acuity and improvement of anatomical outcomes in patients with advanced IERM, effectively reducing CMT and improving DRIL.

Comparison of pars plana vitrectomy and combined pars plana vitrectomy with phacoemulsification for proliferative diabetic retinopathy: A retrospective study about 120 eyes.

To compare the outcomes of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) and combined PPV with phacoemulsification (PPVCE) surgeries for proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) and cataract treatment. Retrospective analysis of 120 diabetic patients who underwent PPV or PPVCE. The key outcome indicators were best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and post-operative complications. The PPVCE group had an average age of 53 years, with 50% females and 50% males. The initial visual acuity (VA) was 1.84 log MAR. In this group, BCVA remained stable or increased in 61 eyes (74%). Regarding the PPV group, the average age was 43 years; 65% were men while 34% were women. The initial VA was 1.83 log MAR; in this group, the VA increased or remained stable in 28 eyes (73%). The evolution of the VA was rather symmetric in the two groups without a significant difference (P = 0.9). Similarly, the occurrence of postoperative complications was comparable for the main complications studied, namely the inflammatory reaction (P = 0.809), ocular hypertension (P = 0.344), corneal edema (P = 0.07), and neovascular glaucoma (P = 0.413). However, there was a decrease in BCVA (three lines) in the PPV group after 6 months of follow-up (P = 0.05) in patients with a clear lens preoperatively and who developed a clinically evident cataract. According to this study, for diabetic patients with severe cataracts and vitreoretinal disease requiring vitrectomy, combining vitrectomy with phacoemulsification as a single surgical intervention may be a suitable therapeutic choice. This approach does not significantly increase the risk of visual impairment or retinopathy development.

The Role of Preoperative Case Selection in the Training of Surgical Repair of Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment.

To analyse single-operation anatomical success (SOAS) of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) repair by junior vitreoretinal surgeons guided by preoperative individual case selection by an experienced mentor vitreoretinal surgeon. Retrospective, single institute, observational study, included all patients who underwent standard pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) or combined encircling band (CB) and PPV and gas tamponade in the treatment of RRD from November 2021 to December 2022 were included. Preoperative selection for the surgery decision, whether standard PPV or combined CB & PPV was undertaken through the senior surgeon; according to the location and extensions of the RRD, number of retinal tears (RT) and lens status. We excluded patients with tractional retinal detachment, RD with proliferative vitreoretinopathy stage C, giant tears, trauma, previous scleral buckle, schisis RD and RD requiring silicone oil. The primary outcome measure was to evaluate the single-operation anatomic success (SOAS). Secondary outcome measures evaluated whether there was a statistical significant difference between both procedures. Eighty-two eyes were included in the study. Forty-five eyes were selected for combined CB&PPV and 37 eyes for standard PPV. SOAS was achieved in 40 eyes (88.8%) in combined group and 35 eyes (94.5%) in standard PPV group. There was no statistically significant difference in the success rate between both operations, p = 0.65. Structured preoperative selection of standardized surgical techniques according to the degree of complexity of RD together with close supervision enables junior vitreoretinal surgeons in training to achieve re-attachment rates of more than 80% with both types of surgeries.

Bacterial endophthalmitis following anti-VEGF intravitreal injections: a retrospective case series

BackgroundTo describe the incidence of endophthalmitis and the treatment outcomes of acute bacterial endophthalmitis following intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections in a Brazilian hospital. The analysis was based on the timing of infection after intravitreal injection, culture results, visual acuity, and the presence of epiretinal membrane after a 1-year follow-up period, spanning nine years.MethodsThis retrospective case series, conducted over a 9-year period, aimed to evaluate the treatment outcomes of acute endophthalmitis following intravitreal Bevacizumab injections. The inclusion criteria involved a chart review of 25 patients who presented clinical signs of acute endophthalmitis out of a total of 12,441 injections administered between January 2011 and December 2019. Negative culture results of vitreous samples or incomplete data were excluded. Ultimately, 23 patients were enrolled in the study. Eight patients were treated with intravitreal antibiotic injections (IVAI) using vancomycin 1.0 mg/0.05mL and ceftazidime 2.25 mg/0.05mL, while 15 patients underwent pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) followed by intravitreal antibiotic injections at the end of surgery (IVAIES). The main outcome measures were the efficacy of controlling the infection with IVAI as a standalone therapy compared to early PPV followed by IVAIES. Data collected included pre-infection and one-year post-treatment best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), optical coherence tomography (OCT) abnormalities, and enucleation/evisceration rates. To compare groups, Mann-Whitney and ANOVA tests were employed for statistical analysis.ResultsThe incidence rate of bacterial endophthalmitis was 0.185% (1/541 anti-VEGF injections), with the highest infection rates observed in 2014 and 2017. Patients presented clinical symptoms between 2 and 7 days after injection. The most common isolated organisms were coagulase-negative Staphylococci and Streptococci spp. Treatment outcomes showed that both IVAI and PPV + IVAIES effectively controlled the infection and prevented globe atrophy. After one year, the PPV group with BCVA better than Light Perception had a significantly better BCVA compared to the IVAI group (p 0.003). However, PPV group had higher incidence of epiretinal membranes formation compared to the IVAI group. (P 0.035)ConclusionAnti-VEGF injections carry a risk of developing acute bacterial endophthalmitis. Isolated antibiotic therapy could be an effective treatment to control the infection, but performing PPV + IVAIES as a primary treatment showed promising results in terms of improving BCVA after one year, despite a higher rate of epiretinal membrane formation. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Pars plana vitrectomy versus intravitreal antibiotics for endophthalmitis management following intravitreal anti-VEGF agents: A meta-analysis.

In this meta-analysis, we aim to compare the efficacy and safety of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) versus tap-and-inject (TAI) of intravitreal antibiotics for the management of endophthalmitis secondary to intravitreal injections of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents. A systematic literature search was conducted on Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central (January 2005-October 2022). The primary analysis compared initial PPV versus TAI and the secondary analysis examined the efficacy and safety of TAI alone compared to TAI followed by PPV. The quality of non-randomized observational studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The quality of the evidence was assessed for each outcome. A random effects meta-analysis was performed. Weighted mean differences (WMDs) with 95% confidence intervals were reported. Of the 7474 screened studies, nine studies reporting on 153 eyes were included. The change in mean best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) between endophthalmitis presentation and last follow-up did not significantly differ between the initial TAI versus PPV groups (WMD = 0.05 units; 95% CI -0.12 to 0.22; p = 0.59; heterogeneity p = 0.41). The difference in pre- to post-treatment mean BCVA did not significantly differ between eyes that received TAI alone or TAI followed by PPV (WMD = 0.04 units; 95% CI -0.42 to 0.51; p = 0.85; heterogeneity p = 0.74). While the meta-analysis revealed no significant difference in the change in BCVA between PPV and TAI to treat endophthalmitis secondary to anti-VEGF agents, the quality of evidence was low with potential for confounding and selection bias. Further well-designed studies in this setting are needed.

Axial length, vitreoretinal pathology, and anterior chamber depth can predict postoperative refractive outcomes in phacovitrectomy/silicone oil removal.

To evaluate the postoperative refractive prediction error (PE) and determine the factors that affect the refractive outcomes of combined pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) or silicone oil removal (SOR) with cataract surgery. The study is a retrospective, case-series study. Totally 301 eyes of 301 patients undergoing combined PPV/SOR with cataract surgery were enrolled. Eligible individuals were separated into four groups according to their preoperative diagnoses: silicone oil-filled eyes after PPV (group 1), epiretinal membrane (group 2), macular hole (group 3), and primary retinal detachment (RD; group 4). The variables affecting postoperative refractive outcomes were analyzed, including age, gender, preoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), axial length (AL), keratometry average, anterior chamber depth (ACD), intraocular tamponade, and vitreoretinal pathology. The outcome measurements include the mean refractive PE and the proportions of eyes with a PE within ±0.50 diopter (D) and ±1.00 D. For all patients, the mean PE was -0.04±1.17 D, and 50.17% of patients (eyes) had a PE within ±0.50 D. There was a significant difference in refractive outcomes among the four groups (P=0.028), with RD (group 4) showing the least favorable refractive outcome. In multivariate regression analysis, only AL, vitreoretinal pathology, and ACD were strongly associated with PE (all P<0.01). Univariate analysis revealed that longer eyes (AL>26 mm) and a deeper ACD were correlated with hyperopic PE, and shorter eyes (AL<26 mm) and a shallower ACD were correlated with myopic PE. RD patients have the least favorable refractive outcome. AL, vitreoretinal pathology, and ACD are strongly associated with PE in the combined surgery. These three factors affect refractive outcomes and thus can be used to predict a better postoperative refractive outcome in clinical practice.

Effect of Intravitreal Conbercept Injection on Complications of Pars Plana Vitrectomy in Patients with Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy.

The effect of intravitreal conbercept (IVC) before pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) on surgical complications in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) was observed. A total of 152 patients with PDR operated on in Jiangsu Provincial People's Hospital from November 2019 to November 2020 were divided into two groups: 124 patients in the preoperative intravitreal conbercept injection + PPV group (IVC group) and 28 patients in the PPV only group (No-IVC group). Vitreous samples were collected in all eyes of patients who underwent vitrectomy, and the content of VEGF-A was measured by Luminex. The effect of conbercept on intraoperative and postoperative complications of PDR was assessed. The content of VEGF in the vitreous of the IVC group was significantly lower than that in the No-IVC group (64.50 ± 58.40 pg/mL vs. 805.17 ± 417.60 pg/mL, p < 0.001). During postoperative follow-up, early postoperative vitreous hemorrhage (VH) occurred in 13 of 142 eyes (9.15%). Compared with the No-IVC group, PDR patients with VH and fibrovascular membrane (FVM) or high complexity in the IVC group had lower intraoperative bleeding rates (p < 0.05). The early postoperative hemorrhage rate in the IVC group was lower than in the No-IVC group (6.03% vs. 23.08%, p < 0.05). The number of intraoperative electrocoagulation and iatrogenic retinal holes in the IVC group was significantly lower than in the No-IVC group (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in intraocular hypertension and NVG numbers between the two groups. Visual acuity in both groups improved after PPV surgery, reaching the highest level in the 3rd month after the operation. IVC before PPV can reduce the level of VEGF-A in the vitreous body and reduce surgical complications.

Postoperative complications after successful primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair

BackgroundTo evaluate the incidence and risk factors for cystoid macular edema (CME) and epiretinal membrane (ERM) development after surgery for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD).MethodsRetrospective observational cohort study involving 62 consecutive patients with primary RRD who underwent RRD repair with either scleral buckling (SB) or pars plana vitrectomy (PPV). SB was used in young phakic patients without posterior vitreous detachment (PVD), high myopic patients, and RRD associated with either anterior or inferior retinal tears. PPV was preferred over SB in pseudophakic patients or those with media opacity and posterior breaks that precluded the SB approach. After surgery, the macular changes, including CME and ERM development, were evaluated 3 and 6 months postoperatively. Phacoemulsification and intraocular lens (IOL) implantation were performed in phakic patients where media opacity or lens bulging did not allow the surgeon to perform surgical maneuvers. The inner limiting membrane (ILM) peeling was randomly performed in the macula-off and the macula-on RRD “pending foveal detachment” subgroup.ResultsSixty-two eyes affected by RRD who underwent SB or PPV were enrolled. CME occurred in 33.3% of the PPV group regardless of the ERM formation. No CME cases were found in the SB group. Macula-off RRD increased the risk of CME by odds ratio (OR) = 4.3 times compared to macula-on RRD regardless of the surgical procedure (p = 0.04). Macula-off status increased the risk of CME of OR = 1.73 times compared to macula-on in the PPV subgroup (p = 0.4). Combined cataract surgery and PPV increased the risk of CME by OR = 3.3 times (p = 0.16) compared to PPV alone, and ILM peeling increased the risk of postoperative CME by OR = 1.8 times (p = 0.37). ERM occurred in 28% of patients who did not undergo ILM peeling, and 29.42% of those who underwent ILM peeling developed ERM (p = 0.6).ConclusionsThe risk of postoperative CME was higher in patients with macula-off than in macula-on RRD and in those with macula-off RRD who underwent PPV. The SB would be advisable in patients with RRD sparing the macula. Furthermore, despite having several advantages, the combined phacoemulsification plus IOL implantation and PPV highly increased the risk of postoperative CME.

The Ocular Trauma Score Underestimates Visual Recovery for the Most Severe Open-Globe Injuries

To compare visual outcomes after open-globe injury (OGI) with those predicted by the Ocular Trauma Score (OTS), and to investigate the effect of treatment with pars plana vitrectomy (PPV). Retrospective cohort study. Patients presenting with OGI to an academic United States ophthalmology department from 2017 to2020. Best-corrected visual acuity (VA) measurements at the most recent follow-up were compared with final VA predicted by the OTS, based on preoperative injury characteristics. The most recently measured VA of patients treated with PPV during initial OGI repair (primary PPV group) was compared with patients treated with PPV after initial OGI repair (secondary PPV group) and patients never treated with PPV (No PPV group). Best-corrected VA in the injured eye at last follow-up; secondary outcome measures included the occurrence of vitreous hemorrhage at any time, occurrence of retinal detachment at any time, rates of additional surgery, and rates of enucleation. One-hundred and thirty-three subjects with OGI were identified and analyzed. The overall rate of PPV was 32%. Predictors of worse VA at last follow-up included older age (P= 0.047) and worse presenting VA (P < 0.001). Visual acuity outcomes for eyes in OTS categories 2 to 5 did not significantly differ from OTS predictions. However, eyes in OTS category 1 had a higher likelihood of last follow-up VA of light perception (LP) to hand motion (46% in the study cohort vs. 15% predicted by the OTS, P= 0.004) and a lower likelihood of no LP (33% vs. 74%, P < 0.001). The secondary PPV group had the worst VA at presentation among the 3 groups (P= 0.016), but VA at last follow-up did not significantly differ between the study groups (P= 0.338). The most severe OGIs (i.e., OTS category 1) had better visual outcomes than predicted by the published OTS expectations, and secondary PPV was associated with significant visual improvement despite poor prognostic predictions. Evaluation by a vitreoretinal surgeon should be considered for all patients with severe OGI, especially those in OTS category1. Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

Acute postoperative endophthalmitis after cataract operation: result of early vitrectomy within 24 hours of presentation.

To evaluate result of early pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) within 24 hours of presentation for acute postoperative endophthalmitis after cataract operation, and to determine factors that predict visual outcome. Consecutive patients who developed acute postoperative endophthalmitis within 6 weeks after cataract operation were reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups for analysis: (1) those receiving PPV within 24 hours of presentation (early PPV group), and (2) those receiving initial intravitreal antibiotics only without PPV within 24 hours of presentation (IVA group). Out of 41,411 cataract operations, 22 eyes developed acute postoperative endophthalmitis. Presenting VA was hand-movement or worse in 72.7%. The most common organisms were Staphylococcus (40.9%), Streptococcus (13.6%) and Enterococcus (13.6%). 22.7% of eyes had good final VA ≥ 20/30 and 27.3% had poor final VA < 20/400. Early PPV group had significantly lower rate of requiring additional treatments to control infection (25% versus 80%, P = 0.030), higher rate of retinal detachment (25% versus 0%, P = 0.221) and similar final logMAR VA (1.08 ± 1.08 versus 0.80 ± 0.80, P = 0.489) compared to IVA. Multivariate linear regression analysis showed that worse final VA was significantly associated with Streptococcus (ß = 1.92, P = 0.007) and retinal detachment (ß = 1.72, P = 0.005) but not with early PPV (P = 0.225). Early PPV was superior to initial intravitreal antibiotics alone as it required fewer additional treatments to control infection. Visual outcome was similar between early PPV and initial intravitreal antibiotics alone despite high number of poor presenting VA of light-perception in early PPV group. Streptococcal infection and retinal detachment were major poor prognostic factors for vision.

PNEUMATIC VITREOLYSIS VERSUS PARS PLANA VITRECTOMY IN FOCAL SYMPTOMATIC VITREOMACULAR TRACTION SYNDROME

To compare pneumatic vitreolysis and pars plana vitrectomy in the management of focal symptomatic vitreomacular traction (VMT). Patients aged 18 years or older, with idiopathic focal symptomatic VMT and best-corrected visual acuity <20/40, without any other retinal pathology were randomized to undergo pneumatic vitreolysis (Group 1) or pars plana vitrectomy (Group 2). The primary outcome measure was resolution of traction confirmed with optical coherence tomography at 3 months. Secondary outcome measures were to compare changes in best-corrected visual acuity, central foveal thickness, and complications if any. A total of 30 eyes of 30 patients were included with 15 eyes in each group. Vitreomacular traction resolved successfully in 12 of 15 (80%) eyes in Group 1 and in all (100%) eyes in Group 2 (P = 0.224). The mean visual acuity improved from 0.80 ± 0.26 (20/126 Snellen's equivalent) to 0.70 ± 0.46 logMAR (20/100 Snellen's equivalent) in Group 1 (P = 0.71) and from 0.904 ± 0.44 (20/160 Snellen's equivalent) to 0.47 ± 0.26 logMAR (20/59 Snellen's equivalent) in Group 2 (P = 0.0016). Although 4 of 15 (26.66%) eyes in Group 1 had formation of full-thickness macular hole and 7 eyes required resurgery (4 for full-thickness macular hole and 3 for unresolved VMT), none in the pars plana vitrectomy group had any complications requiring resurgery (P = 0.0063). Two eyes in the pars plana vitrectomy group had intraoperative deroofing of the fovea leading to full-thickness macular hole. Pars plana vitrectomy is better than pneumatic vitreolysis as a single intervention in the management of focal symptomatic VMT.

Comparison of Outcomes From Delayed-Onset Bleb-Related Endophthalmitis Treated With Pars Plana Vitrectomy Versus Vitreous Biopsy.

Bleb-related endophthalmitis (BRE) is a serious complication of glaucoma filtration surgery. The current study reports similar visual and intraocular pressure (IOP) outcomes in eyes treated with pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) compared with vitreous biopsy and injection of intravitreal antibiotics (TI). The purpose of this study was to investigate the isolated organisms, visual acuity (VA), and IOP outcomes associated with delayed-onset BRE in eyes treated with PPV versus TI. A retrospective chart review was conducted at the Bascom Palmer Eye Institute (Miami, Florida) and the University of Florida (Gainesville, FL) identifying patients treated for BRE with at least 1 month of follow-up from the inception of an electronic health record (2014 and 2011, respectively) through 2021. All patients had undergone bleb-forming glaucoma surgery at least 1 month before endophthalmitis diagnosis. Thirty-nine eyes from 39 patients (33 from Bascom Palmer, 6 from University of Florida) were included. Trabeculectomy was performed in 34 of 39 eyes (87.2%). Streptococcus species (9 eyes, 23.1%) and Staphylococcus species (8 eyes, 20.5%) were the most common isolated organisms and were similar in both treatment groups ( P =0.49). Baseline VA was worse in the PPV group (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution: 2.51 vs. 2.16, P =0.04), but VA at last follow-up was similar ( P =0.48) in both groups. After recovery from BRE, the average IOP in the PPV group was 15.1 mm Hg on 0.9 IOP-lowering medications compared with 12.6 mm Hg on 1.2 medications in the TI group (IOP: P =0.56; medications: P =0.80). Additional glaucoma surgery was performed in 44.4% of the PPV eyes and 16.7% of the TI eyes ( P =0.09). In eyes with delayed-onset BRE, isolated organisms, visual outcomes, and IOP control were similar after initial PPV compared with TI.