ABSTRACT Thinking of Pagan and Wiccan serials as grey literature does not come to mind at first. This is due to the evolution of the grey literature concept from when it first appeared. During the Third International Conference on Grey Literature in 1997, the concept underwent its first major definition change to include the production and distributed aspect of the literature. Three years later, the definition was further expanded to those issued from entities whose primary function is something other than publishing. 1 These changes allowed the folding of any non-commercial publication. Many early Pagan and Wiccan publications were created in a home office and then Xeroxed before being mailed, or they used a local jobber to print them. Subscriptions were available for those issued in the latter half of twentieth century. Acquisition of a small number of current occult publications is still via subscription; however, many have changed to a first come first served scenario. For example, issue seven (February 2020) of Fiddler’s Green Peculiar Parish Magazine was launched as a Kickstarter. Many others are announced on Facebook or email mailing lists with links to the official site to grab your copy while they last. Some are only available to members associated with the group and a smaller segment of these are limited to those studying the faith. How these publications originate and may be distributed places them solidly in the grey literature arena. In 2016, Valdosta State University acquired a large Pagan Archive made up of published and unpublished material. Cataloging of these resources has been a challenge. Authors may use pseudonyms and issues of periodicals may lack both enumeration and chronology. Knowledge of contemporary Neopaganism seems almost a necessity to adequately describe these resources. Research on associated people and groups is certainly needed. But there are other issues as well: name authorities and subject headings. A significant percentage of producers of Neopagan periodicals lack authority records. Prominent authors have name headings, but the groups they are associated with do not. Covens or stand-alone groups also lack name authorities. Occasionally, when an authority does exist for an entity, the creator of the authority record misinterpreted the verbiage on the publication, creating relationship errors to other organizations. On a positive side, Resource Description and Access (RDA) brings possibilities of linking names to the groups they are associated with. One of the most frustrating cataloging tasks is in the adding of Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) and Library of Congress Genre/Form Terms (LCGFT). From the beginning, no Wiccan sect had been established in LCSH, even with cataloged resources in OCLC specifically on these sects. Many of the common subjects lacked appropriate subject headings. Past practice for non-SACO (Subject Authority Cooperative) libraries was just to add the broadest subject of Occultism, Paganism, or Wicca when a more specific subject heading would be beneficial to patrons. Libraries and archives in the last decade have experienced an influx of contemporary Pagan and Wiccan collections coming to them as religious leaders have begun building collections to preserve their legacy. This article will provide helpful insight on how to describe serial resources and clarify what publications show, as well as introduce some of the new MARC fields. The discussion of RDA and new MARC fields used to catalog Neopagan resources can also be applied to all serials regardless of subject.
Read full abstract