Paradoxical Puborectalis Contraction Research Articles

The Relevance of the Excessive Perineal Descent in the Obstructed Defecation Syndrome: A Prospective Study of 141 Patients.

Despite the widely accepted association between excessive straining and perineal descent, the clinical significance of perineal descent in patients with obstructed defecation syndrome is still unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of pathological perineal descent in patients with obstructed defecation syndrome and the impact of perineal descent on symptoms severity. This was a prospective multicenter uncontrolled study. The study involved 3 hospital pelvic-care centers and was conducted from January 2018 to January 2022. The study included 141 consecutive adult patients with an obstructed defecation syndrome score of 9 or more and no evidence of organic GI pathology. All the patients underwent dynamic pelvic MRI and, in case of suspected paradoxical puborectalis contraction, anal manometry. Main outcome measures were the prevalence of excessive perineal descent and the correlation between perineal descent and obstructed defecation syndrome score. One hundred twenty-eight patients (90.7%) completed magnetic resonance examination and were included in the analysis. Of these, 18 patients (14.1%) had a physiological perineal descent and 110 (85.9%) had an excessive perineal descent. Excessive perineal descent was found in 46.1% of patients (12/26) with MRI signs of paradoxical puborectalis contraction and in 96% of patients (98/102) with normal puborectalis relaxation. In this latter group of patients, a good correlation between obstructed defecation syndrome score and maximum perineal descent during straining was found (Spearman r test: 0.68; p < 0.0001). The study was limited by the small sample size and by the strong selection of the study population. Excessive perineal descent is a common finding in patients with obstructed defecation syndrome and high symptoms score, occurring almost consistently in patients without paradoxical puborectalis contraction. In these patients, the maximum perineal descent seems to be well correlated with symptoms severity. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/C135 . ANTECEDENTES:A pesar de la asociación ampliamente aceptada entre el esfuerzo excesivo y el descenso perineal, la importancia clínica del descenso perineal en pacientes con síndrome de defecación obstruida aún no está clara.OBJETIVO:Evaluar la prevalencia del descenso perineal patológico en pacientes con síndrome de defecación obstruida y el impacto del descenso perineal en la severidad de los síntomas.DISEÑO:Este fue un estudio prospectivo multicéntrico no controladoENTORNO CLINICO:El estudio involucró a tres centros hospitalarios de atención pélvica y se llevó a cabo entre enero de 2018 y enero de 2022.PACIENTES:El estudio incluyó a 141 pacientes adultos consecutivos con puntuación del síndrome de defecación obstruida ≥ 9 y sin evidencia de patología gastrointestinal orgánica. A todas las pacientes se les realizó resonancia magnética pélvica dinámica y, en caso de sospecha de contracción puborrectal paradójica, manometría anal.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Las principales medidas de resultado fueron la prevalencia del descenso perineal excesivo y la correlación entre el descenso perineal y la puntuación del síndrome de defecación obstruida.RESULTADOS:Ciento veintiocho (90,7%) pacientes completaron el examen de resonancia magnética y fueron incluidos en el análisis. De estos, 18 (14,1%) presentaron descenso perineal fisiológico y 110 (85,9%) descenso perineal excesivo. Se encontró descenso perineal excesivo en el 46,1% (12/26) de los pacientes con signos de contracción puborrectal paradójica en la resonancia magnética y en el 96% (98/102) de los pacientes con relajación puborrectal normal. En estos últimos pacientes se encontró una buena correlación entre la puntuación del síndrome de defecación obstruida y el descenso perineal máximo durante el esfuerzo (prueba r de Spearman: 0,68; p < 0,0001).LIMITACIONES:El estudio estuvo limitado por el pequeño tamaño de la muestra y por la fuerte selección de la población de estudio.CONCLUSIONES:El descenso perineal excesivo es un hallazgo común en pacientes con síndrome de defecación obstruida y alto puntaje de síntomas, ocurriendo casi constantemente en pacientes sin contracción puborrectal paradójica. En estos últimos pacientes el descenso perineal máximo parece estar bien correlacionado con la severidad de los síntomas. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCRC135 . (Traducción- Dr. Francisco M. Abarca-Rendon ).

Obstructed defecation syndrome associated with paradoxical puborectalis contraction: osteopathic treatment versus anal biofeedback. Results of a pilot study.

Biofeedback is the most widespread rehabilitative therapy for the treatment of anismus after failed conservative treatment. Osteopathy represents an alternative therapy for constipation. The aim of this study was to evaluate short- and long-term results of osteopathic treatment as compared to biofeedback in patients with dyssynergic defecation. This was a prospective cohort pilot study on 30 patients with dyssynergic defecation enrolled at the Colorectal Clinic of the University Hospital of Ferrara, Italy, from May 2015 to May 2016 and followed until May 2020. Dyssynergic defecation was defined as the inappropriate contraction of the pelvic floor or less than 20% relaxation of basal resting sphincter pressure (on anal manometry) with adequate propulsive forces during attempted defecation. Dyssynergic patients were divide into 2 treatment groups: 15 patients had osteopathy and 15 patients had biofeedback. Before and 3months after rehabilitation treatment, all patients had anorectal manometry, defecography, and ultrasound, and were evaluated with the Cleveland Clinic Florida (CCF) constipation score, obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS) score, Colo-rectal-anal Distress Inventory (CRADI-8), Colo-rectal-anal Impact Questionnaire (CRAIQ-7), and the Brusciano Score (BS). To evaluate the efficacy of osteopathy and biofeedback in the long-term, all patients completed the above-mentioned questionnaires 5years later via a telephone interview. The two treatments were similarly effective in the short term with reduction in questionnaires scores, and increase in the percentage of anal sphincter release at straining at anorectal manometry in both groups. The ODS score was significantly reduced in biofeedback group (p = 0.021). The 3-month post-treatment BS was lower in the osteopathy group, but this just failed to reach statistical significance (p = 0.050). Periodic rehabilitation reinforcements were provided. The CCF constipation score decreased significantly in the osteopathy group (p = 0.023) after 5years. Osteopathy is a promising treatment for dyssynergic defecation, and it can be associated with biofeedback.

Early Effects of High-intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) Treatment for Prostate Cancer on Fecal Continence and Anorectal Physiology

To evaluate high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) effects on anorectal physiology and fecal continence or constipation, and on quality of life (QoL). We prospectively evaluated 26 patients with localized prostate cancer who underwent HIFU. The Rome III criteria for functional constipation, the Cleveland Clinic Florida Fecal Incontinence Score, and the Fecal Incontinence QoL Score questionnaires were answered before and after treatment. Anorectal manometry was used to evaluate resting and squeezing pressures, sustained contraction, paradoxical puborectalis contraction, rectal sensation, and rectal capacity. Thirteen patients underwent hemiablation and 13 underwent whole-gland ablation. There was no difference between groups regarding the Rome III criteria for functional constipation results. The Cleveland Clinic Florida Fecal Incontinence Score results showed that 3 (11.5%) of patients had mild fecal incontinence before HIFU and 5 (19.2%) had it afterward (P=.625). No patients reported poor QoL due to fecal incontinence in the Fecal Incontinence QoL Score. Anorectal manometry demonstrated no decrease in resting pressure after treatment (P=.299), while squeezing pressure significantly increased from 151.87 to 167.91 mm Hg (P=.034). The number of patients with normal sustained contraction remained the same (20 [77%]). Paradoxical puborectalis contraction was seen in 12 (46%) of the patients before the procedure and in 13 (50%) after (P=.713). Improvement in sensory parameters was not significant: first sense changed from 73.46 to 49.71 mL (P=.542) and first urge from 98.27 to 82.88 mL (P=.106). Rectal capacity had a nonsignificant decrease from 166.15 to 141.15mL (P=.073). HIFU did not cause significant changes in anorectal physiology. Fecal incontinence or constipation after HIFU was not observed via validated questionnaires.

MR defecography in ano-rectal dysfunction: a clinical-radiological correlation study

BackgroundThe aim of this work is to assess the diagnostic accuracy of MR defecography in ano-rectal dysfunction [ARD] for proper treatment planning.ResultsMR defecography was done to 30 patients with ARD for detection of its functional and structural causes. Increased perineal descent was detected in 70% of cases, rectocele in 46.7%, rectal intussusception in 40%, cystocele in 26.7%, uterine prolapse in 27.7%, enterocele in 13.3%, and paradoxical puborectalis contraction in 30%.ConclusionMR defecography is an essential diagnostic tool for optimum management of ano-rectal dysfunction patients.

MR defecography in obstructed Defecation syndrome

Abstract Background ODS is an emerging clinical problem, especially for adult female patients (80%–90%). The pathophysiology of ODS remains to be clearly defined. This is because anatomic defects, such as internal rectal prolapse and rectocele, may be associated with functional alterations, such as paradoxical puborectalis contraction and spastic external sphincter contraction. Aim of the Work Obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS) is a type of constipation characterized by fragmented stools, need for straining at defecation, sense of incomplete evacuation, tenesmus, urgency and pelvic heaviness. This study is aimed to assess and compare and matching the role of Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI defecography) with the cilincal diagnosis in such patients. Pateints and Methods This retrospective, case-control study was conducted on twenty patients suffering from obstructive defecation syndrome that have been diagnosed clinically. The patients age is ranged between 16 and 69 years old. Results Statistically MRI study showed significant anatomical defects (p &amp;lt; 0.05) as the followings: Most of patients had Rectocele (65%), Disenergic Pelvic Syndrome (DPS) because of pelvic floor descents in (55%) of patients. Intossusception(45%),Cystocele (30%), interocele(25%), Anismus(15%) and uterine prolapsed (15%) Conclusion MRI has good value to detect abnormalities pertinent to posterior compartment in pelvis. Results of MR imaging showed positive agreement with clinical diagnosis of ODS in65% of patients. MRI showed 90% sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values as well as accuracy. MRI assessment of the posterior pelvic compartment can be indicated to detect the anatomical defects and lead to more successfully patient management and subsequently decreases the rate of postoperative recurrence.

MR Defecography in Assessing Functional Defecation Disorder: Diagnostic Value of the Defecation Phase in Detection of Dyssynergic Defecation and Pelvic Floor Prolapse in Females

Objective: Dyssynergic defecation (DD) and pelvic floor prolapse often coexist in female functional defecation disorder. A retrospective study was performed to evaluate the ability of dynamic MR sequences with the straining and defecation phase to detect paradoxical puborectalis contraction and occult multiple-compartments disorders. Methods: Fifty-three females clinically diagnosed with DD underwent magnetic resonance defecography. The dynamic sequences consist of rest, squeeze, straining, and defecation. The straining phase (pre rectal filling) and defecation phase (post rectal filling) were acquired to assess for pelvic floor relaxation and pelvic organ descent. MR images were analyzed by 2 radiologists with regard to paradoxical puborectalis contraction (changes in the anorectal angle [ARA]) and the presence of pelvic organ prolapse in straining phase and defecation phase independently. Statistical analysis was performed using Wilcoxon’s matched-pairs signed-ranks test and Crosstabs test for matched pairs. Results: Among the 53 patients with DD, 24 individuals (45.3%) were diagnosed DD with multifocal disorders. Comparison between the straining and the defecation phase revealed that there was no significant difference in the change of the ARA (p > 0.05), while significant differences were found in cystocele, vaginal or cervical prolapse, rectocele and descending perineum syndrome between the straining and the defecation phase (p < 0.05). The defecation phase with impaired evacuation distinguished additional anterior/middle compartments findings in female DD patients. Conclusion: The straining phase and the defecation phase have the same ability in assessing paradoxical puborectalis contraction of the DD. Compared with the straining phase, the defecation phase provides the maximum stress to the pelvic floor resulting in complete levator ani relaxation. In addition to diagnosing the abnormal anorectal function, the defecation phase with the discharge of the rectal filling demonstrates maximum anterior/middle pelvic organ descent in DD patients.

Role of MR Defecography in the Assessment of Obstructed Defecation Syndrome

AbstractBackground: Obstructed Defecation Syndrome (ODS) is characterized by the urge to defecate but an impaired ability to expel the fecal bolus. Symptoms include unsuccessful fecal evacuation attempts, excessive straining, pain, bleeding after defecation, and a sense of incomplete fecal evacuation. ODS has been linked to anatomic abnormalities of rectocele, rec-toanal or recto-rectal intussusception, paradoxical puborectalis contraction, pelvic organ prolapse, descending perineum syndrome, solitary rectal ulcer syndrome, sigmoidocele, and enterocele. A functional abnormality such as pelvic floor dyssynergia, decreased rectal compliance and decreased rectal sensation has also been shown to contribute to symptoms of ODS.Objective: To assess the role of MR defecography in finding functional abnormalities in patients with obstructed defecation syndrome.Patients and Methods: A prospective study was carried out on 30 patients (20 females and 10 males) with clinical symptoms of obstructed defecation syndrome for a period longer than 6 months. Patients were assessed statically using T2 weighted images and dynamically by MR defecography using fast imaging via steady-state acquisition sequences. All patients had symptoms of obstructed defecation syndrome as unsuccessful fecal evacuation attempts, excessive straining, pain during defecation, a sense of incomplete fecal evacuation and digital rectal evacuation.Results: A total of 30 patients with a mean age of 40.2 with 20 (66.7%) females and 10 (33.3%) males. MR defecog-raphy revealed rectocele in 19 (63.3%) of all patients and cystocele in 17 (56.7%) patients. Four patients (13.3%) had rectal intussusception. Spastic pelvic floor syndrome was found in 2 patients (6.75%). Multicompartmental dysfunction was observed in 18 (60%) of the female patients.Conclusion: MR defecography was proven to be highly valuable in assessing patients with obstructed defecation syndrome, particularly females as it depicts multicompart-mental dysfunction in females with a seemingly single com-partment symptom ultimately changing the treatment approach.

Immediate results from biofeedback and anorectal electrostimulation in the treatment of paradoxical puborectal muscle contraction in women with obstructed defecation

ObjectiveThis study was conducted to evaluate the effects of “biofeedback” (BF), electrostimulation (ES), and of the high-fiber diet associated with behavioral therapy in women with obstructed evacuation and paradoxical puborectalis contraction and to compare the results among these three modalities. MethodThirty-one women were evaluated who fulfilled the Rome III Criteria, and with an electromanometric test positive for the presence of contraction in the evacuation maneuver. These patients were randomized into three groups: group I – conventional treatment of constipation, group II – conventional treatment of constipation associated with biofeedback and group III – conventional treatment of constipation associated with electrostimulation. At the beginning of this study and after six weeks, subjective and objective parameters of the anorectal function were evaluated using the Wexner constipation scoring system, the Bristol scale, an visual analogical scale, and anorectal electromanometry. ResultsAll patients demonstrated improvement in bowel satisfaction, stool frequency, effort and feeling of incomplete evacuation, stool-type modifications, and improvement in the quality of life. On examination, there was increased mean pressure of voluntary contraction in group III (p=0.043), decreased sensitivity threshold in group II (p=0.025) and III (p=0.012) and decreased maximum rectal capacity in group II (p=0.005). Only 19.4% (n=6) had their dynamic defecation normalized, and 80.6% (n=25) expressed clinical, non-instrumental, improvement. ConclusionThe conventional treatment of constipation, biofeedback and electrostimulation show a significant subjective improvement in symptoms of obstructed evacuation and in quality of life, regardless of the reversal of the paradoxical puborectalis contraction.

Functional Disorders of Constipation: Paradoxical Puborectalis Contraction and Increased Perineal Descent.

Paradoxical puborectalis contraction (PPC) and increased perineal descent (IPD) are subclasses of obstructive defecation. Often these conditions coexist, which can make the evaluation, workup, and treatment difficult. After a thorough history and examination, workup begins with utilization of proven diagnostic modalities such as cinedefecography and anal manometry. Advancements in technology have increased the surgeon's diagnostic armamentarium. Biofeedback and pelvic floor therapy have proven efficacy for both conditions as first-line treatment. In circumstances where PPC is refractory to biofeedback therapy, botulinum toxin injection is recommended. Historically, pelvic floor repair has been met with suboptimal results. In IPD, surgical therapy now is directed toward the potentially attendant abnormalities such as rectoanal intussusception and rectal prolapse. When these associated abnormalities are not present, an ostomy should be considered in patients with IPD as well as medically refractory PPC.

Use of Biofeedback Combined With Diet for Treatment of Obstructed Defecation Associated With Paradoxical Puborectalis Contraction (Anismus): Predictive Factors and Short-term Outcome.

Numerous studies have described the use of biofeedback therapy for the treatment of anismus. Success rates vary widely, but few data are available regarding factors predictive of success. Our aim was to evaluate short-term results of biofeedback associated with diet in patients with obstructed defecation because of anismus and to investigate factors that may affect the results. Patients were identified from a single-institution prospectively maintained database. This study was conducted in a tertiary hospital. Consecutive patients who had obstructed defecation associated with anismus and were treated with biofeedback associated with diet were eligible. Each patient underwent anal manometry and/or dynamic anal ultrasound. Patients with anismus and were treated with biofeedback associated with diet. Patients classed as having a satisfactory response to therapy and those classed as having an unsatisfactory response were compared with regard to sex, age, Cleveland Clinic Florida constipation score, functional factors (anal resting and squeeze pressures and reversal of paradoxical puborectalis contraction on manometry), and anatomic factors in women (history of vaginal delivery, number of vaginal deliveries, menopause, hysterectomy, and previous anorectal surgery). A total of 116 patients were included (75 women and 41 men). Overall, 59% were classed as having a satisfactory response (decrease in constipation score, >50%). Patients with satisfactory responses to biofeedback plus diet did not differ from those with unsatisfactory responses with regard to clinical, anatomic, and physiological factors. This was not a randomized controlled trial. Biofeedback combined with diet is a valuable treatment option for patients with obstructed defecation syndrome associated with anismus, and more than half of our patients of both sexes achieved a satisfactory response. Improvement was not related to reversal of paradoxical contraction of puborectalis muscles at manometry. Patient sex, age, previous anorectal surgery, anorectal manometry pressures, and vaginal delivery, menopause, and hysterectomy in women did not significantly affect outcome.

Avaliação manométrica anorretal de mulheres adultas com diagnóstico clínico e urodinâmico de bexiga hiperativa

Anorectal manometry is a diagnostic method often used in clinical practice for assessing functional anorectal disorders and pelvic floor. The dysfunctional voiding, anorectal and pelvic floor has been considered as contributing factors of the symptoms of overactive bladder. To evaluate the results with anorectal manometry in adult women with clinical and urodynamic diagnostics of overactive bladder. Twenty-five adult women (mean age 45.5 ± 11.9 years) with clinical and urodynamic diagnostic of overactive bladder underwent anorectal manometry and the results of this assessment were compared to a control group of eighteen women (mean age 33.9 ± 10.7 years) with no urinary or intestinal disorders and without clinical criteria for diagnosis of overactive bladder. Paradoxical puborectalis contraction occurred in six patients in the overactive bladder group and none of the controls. There were no significant between group differences in the following manometric parameters: rectoanal inhibitory reflex, rectal sensitivity, maximum tolerable volume, resting pressure, and hypertonia at rest. Mean squeeze pressure was 182.2 mmHg in the overactive bladder group versus 148.1 mmHg in the control group. Women with overactive bladder had increased incidence of paradoxical puborectalis contraction than women in the control group.

Evaluation of Constipation

The evaluation of the chronically constipated patient is multifaceted and challenging. Many clinicians define constipation according to the latest Rome III diagnostic criteria for functional gastrointestinal disorders. Female sex, older age, low fiber diet, a sedentary life style, malnutrition, polypharmacy, and a lower socioeconomic status have all been identified as risk factors for functional constipation. In elderly patients, it is important to rule out a colonic malignancy as the cause of constipation. The initial evaluation of the constipated patient includes a detailed history to elicit symptoms distinguishing slow transit constipation from obstructive defecation. Slow transit and obstructive defecation are the two major subtypes of functional constipation. In addition, the clinician should identify any secondary causes of constipation. The office examination of the constipated patient includes an abdominal, perineal, and a rectal exam. Many patients improve with lifestyle modification. When dietary interventions and lifestyle modifications fail, many diagnostic studies are available to further evaluate the constipated patient. Sitzmark transit study, nuclear scintigraphic defecography, electromyography, anorectal manometry, balloon expulsion test, paradoxical puborectalis contraction, cinedefecography, and dynamic magnetic resonance imaging defecography have all been used to diagnose the underlying causes of functional constipation.

Good Post-operative Results Depend on Strict Patient Selection and Strict Operative Procedure

See Article on Page 140-144 Post-operative results are variable. Some rectoceles might be caused by a paradoxical puborectalis contraction leading to an outlet obstruction and to disappointing surgical results [1]. Thus, an anorectal physiologic study including anal sponge (anal plug) electromyography should be performed for excluding non-relaxing puborectalis syndrome [2]. In that case, biofeedback therapy should be applied first. A vital point for a good post-operative result is the tightness (strength) of the reconstructed rectovaginal septum even though long-term post-operative results aredisappointing [3]. A larger decrease in the rectocele diameter means greater strength of the rectovaginal septum.

Simplified Evaluation of the Paradoxical Puborectalis Contraction With Surface Electrodes

Paradoxical puborectalis contraction during defecation is one possible explanation for constipation. The degree of paradoxical contraction can be evaluated by intramuscular electromyography from the puborectalis and external anal sphincter muscles. This study aimed to determine whether a noninvasive technique with surface electrodes placed over the subcutaneous part of the external anal sphincter is feasible in the evaluation of paradoxical activity. Twenty-five patients with constipation were studied. Sphincter muscle activity during strain and squeeze maneuvers was recorded using surface electrodes placed 1 cm from the anal verge. In addition, intramuscular recordings were made simultaneously from the external anal sphincter and puborectalis muscles. The degree of paradoxical activation was calculated as a strain/squeeze index. The patients were examined either in the left lateral position or sitting on a commode. The study revealed significant (P < .01) correlations between indices obtained from the surface anal sphincter recordings and the intramuscular recordings (from the external anal sphincter and the puborectalis muscles). Surface recordings from the external anal sphincter seem to be an equally reliable, less time consuming, and less painful alternative to invasive measurements of paradoxical activity. In a few patients, however, invasive recordings may still be required.

The Constipated Child: Is There a Correlation Between Symptoms and Manometric Findings?

The aim of our study was to evaluate patients referred for care of chronic constipation. We compared results of the anorectal manometry studies with a patient/guardian questionnaire about the patients' constipation. From patients seen for constipation in the department of pediatric gastroenterology, 123 were prospectively enrolled and they completed symptom questionnaires. These patients already were treated with stool softeners, either by the referring primary care physician or by the referring gastroenterologist. Anorectal manometry was performed per standard protocol. Of the 123 patients enrolled in the study, 57.7% were male. Patient age ranged from 0.2 to 17.8 years, and the mean age was 7.5 years. The average duration of constipation was 4.84 years. The average number of stools per week was 3.6. Average time spent in the defecation process was 13.3 minutes. The incidence of hematochezia was 30%. Delayed passage of meconium was reported in 45 of 99 patients (45.5%). Significant correlation was found between frequency of soiling and threshold for rectoanal inhibitory reflex (P = 0.029). The volume of first urge also was positively correlated with frequency of soiling (P = 0.034). There was significant correlation of withholding behavior and the maximum volume tolerated (P = 0.020). The presence of blood in stool was inversely correlated with the maximum volume tolerated (P = 0.004). No correlation was found between severity of complaints and the presence of paradoxical puborectalis contraction. Of the patients, 90.5% had paradoxical puborectalis contraction. Significant correlation was found between frequency of soiling and rectoanal inhibitory reflex, as well as soiling and volume of first urge. There was correlation between withholding behaviors and maximum volume tolerated. The presence of blood inversely correlated with maximum volume tolerated. Anorectal manometry continues to provide additional new information and to assist in managing patients with this common chronic pediatric affliction.

Paradoxical Puborectalis Contraction and Increased Perineal Descent

Paradoxical puborectalis contraction and increased perineal descent are two forms of functional constipation presenting as challenging diagnostic and treatment dilemmas to the clinician. In the evaluation of these disorders, the clinician should take special care to exclude anatomic disorders leading to constipation. Physical examination is supplemented by additional diagnostic modalities such as cinedefecography, electromyography, manometry, and pudendal nerve tefninal motor latency. Generally, these investigations should be used in combination with the two playing the more relied upon techniques. Treatment is typically conservative with biofeedback playing a principal role with favorable results when patient compliance is emphasized. When considering paradoxical puborectalis contraction, failure of biofeedback is usually augmented with botulinum toxin injection. Increased perineal descent is generally treated with biofeedback and perineal support maneuvers. Surgery has little or no role in these conditions. The patient who insists on surgical intervention for either of these two conditions should be offered a stoma.

Poor symptomatic relief and quality of life in patients treated for “solitary rectal ulcer syndrome without external rectal prolapse”

Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (SRUS) is a chronic disabling condition. Several therapeutic options have been advocated including conservative approaches and surgery, bringing into question their functional outcomes. This study aimed to assess treatment procedures on both anorectal complaints and quality of life (QoL) using standardised self-administered questionnaires. Forty-one patients who underwent treatments for SRUS in two referral centres were reviewed. A standardised self-administered questionnaire including incontinence (Cleveland Clinic), constipation (Knowles-Eccersley-Scott symptom, KESS) and gastrointestinal quality of life index validated scoring systems was mailed to each patient (median follow-up, 36 months). Correlation between treatment options, functional results and quality of life was analysed. The mean Cleveland Clinic and KESS scores were respectively 5.3+/-5.8 (normal 0) and 19.1+/-8 (normal<9). The mean QoL score reached 89+/-28.8 (normal 125). A linear correlation between the QoL score and functional results was observed. There was no influence of treatment options on QoL results. A multivariate analysis identified five parameters predictive of a better QoL: presence of paradoxical puborectalis contraction, absence of descending perineum, absence of procidentia, age<40 and treatment exclusively based on laxatives. Despite several therapeutic options including surgery, patients with SRUS still frequently complain of disturbed anorectal function and significant alteration of their QoL.

Colectomy as treatment for constipation in selected patients.

The aim of this study was to conduct a prospective assessment of the results of total abdominal colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis (TAC) in patients with colonic inertia. Overall, 416 patients were evaluated for chronic constipation. Of the patients 54 (13 per cent) had colonic inertia, defined as diffuse marker delay during transit study without paradoxical puborectalis contraction on cinedefaecography or electromyography. All 54 patients (42 women and 12 men), with a mean age of 49 (range 17-78) years, underwent TAC. Preoperative bowel frequency was a mean of one every 8 days, requiring large doses of laxatives, enemas or both. There was no major postoperative morbidity; five patients were readmitted due to bowel obstruction, three for successful conservative management while the other two required enterolysis. After a mean follow-up of 27 (range 2-51) months these 54 patients reported a mean frequency of spontaneous bowel movements of 3.7 (range 1-10) per day. 'Excellent' or 'good' outcome was reported by 51 patients (94 per cent). TAC can be performed with acceptable morbidity and 94 per cent of patients will have satisfactory improvement in bowel habit.

Anorectal Physiology in Solitary Ulcer Syndrome: A Case-Matched Series

Solitary ulcer syndrome is a rare condition characterized by inflammation and chronic ulcer of the rectal wall in patients suffering from outlet constipation. Despite similar surgical options (rectopexy, anterior resection), solitary ulcer syndrome may differ from overt rectal prolapse with regard to symptoms and pathogenesis. The present work analyzed differences between these conditions in a case-control physiology study. From 1997 to 2002, 931 consecutive subjects were investigated in a single physiology unit for anorectal functional disorders. Standardized questionnaires, anorectal physiology, and evacuation proctography were included in a prospective database. Diagnosis of solitary ulcer syndrome was based on both symptoms and anatomic features in 25 subjects with no overt rectal prolapse (21 females and 4 males; mean age, 37.2 +/- 15.7 years) and no past history of anorectal surgery. They were compared with age-matched and gender-matched subjects: 25 with outlet constipation (also matched on degree of internal procidentia), 25 with overt rectal prolapse without any mucosal change, and 14 with overt rectal prolapse and mucosal changes. Subjects with solitary ulcer syndrome reported symptomatic levels (digitations, pain, incontinence) similar to those of patients with outlet constipation, but they had significantly more constipation and less incontinence than patients with overt rectal prolapse. Compared with each of the three control groups (dyschezia, rectal prolapse without mucosal change, and rectal prolapse with mucosal change), subjects with solitary ulcer syndrome more frequently had an increasing anal pressure at strain (15 vs. 5, 3, and 1, respectively ; P < 0.01) and a paradoxical puborectalis contraction (15 vs. 9, 1, and 1, respectively; P < 0.05). With respect to evacuating proctography, complete rectal emptying was achieved less frequently in this group (5 vs. 12, 23, and 10, respectively; P < 0.05). Compared with patients with overt rectal prolapse, mean resting and squeezing anal pressures were significantly higher in both groups of subjects with solitary ulcer syndrome and with outlet constipation. Prevalence and levels of anatomic disorders (perineal descent, rectocele) did not differ among the four groups except for rectal prolapse grade and prevalence of enterocele (higher in overt rectal prolapse group). Interestingly, and despite matched controls for degree of intussusception, individuals with solitary ulcer syndrome had circular internal procidentia more often compared with those suffering from outlet constipation without mucosal lesions (15 vs. 8, P < 0.05). This case-controlled study quantifies functional anal disorders in patients suffering from solitary ulcer syndrome. Despite no proven etiologic factor, sphincter-obstructed defecation and circular internal procidentia both may play an important part in the pathogenesis and an exclusive surgical approach may not be appropriate in this context.

Evaluation of the Paradoxical Sphincter Contraction by a Strain/Squeeze Index in Constipated Patients

One finding in patients with constipation is the paradoxical puborectalis contraction, i.e. , activation of the sphincter muscles during straining instead of relaxation. The aims of this study were to evaluate the importance of needle placement in sphincter-electromyography and to evaluate a strain/squeeze index in constipated patients and control subjects. We investigated consecutively 194 constipated patients and 16 control subjects with integrated electromyography during straining and squeezing and calculated a strain/squeeze index. The examination was performed in the puborectalis and in the external anal sphincter muscle through hook-electrodes. There was a strong correlation between indices in the puborectalis muscle and in the external anal sphincter muscle (r = 0.70-0.80, P < 0.001). Forty-seven patients (24 percent) had a mean index of greater than 50 compared with none in the control group (P = 0.01). Mean overall index in patients was 24 (range, 0-306) vs. 18 (range, 0-45) in controls (P = 0.12). Patients with an index greater than 50 had impaired rectal evacuation (P < 0.001), increased threshold for urge (P < 0.05), and tended to have fewer stools (P = 0.06). Quantification of paradoxical contraction in the puborectalis and external anal sphincter with a strain/squeeze index differentiates patients in whom paradoxical activity may be a cause of constipation. An index above 50 may be of pathologic significance. Correlations between activity in the puborectalis and external anal sphincter muscle were strong which suggests that investigation in one of them is sufficient.