The paper examines the event of the pandemic in three aspects: a metaphor of our age, an issue of ethics, a new phase of anthropogenesis. As the metaphor of the era, the pandemic stars as Belikov (A. Chekhov’s The Man in the Case): the form of bio-phobia and socio-phobia, the growing sterility of contacts, socializing over distances, closeness, and the priority of packaging (covers) before the procedures of openness, nudity, fusion. There appears a change in genres: the detective as a genre based on the revelation and removal of a shroud of mystery, the punishment of crime, gives way to the genre of the protectIva (from protegere: to shroud, to pull the veil, to shield). The protective is a genre to avert a catastrophe, protect against crime that has already become a norm, — the experience of survival on edge. There emerges homo tegens, “man who enclothes”, who pulls a veil over everything including himself. The pandemic as an issue of ethics poses a multitude of ethical challenges and choices (between utilitarianism and egalitarianism, the principles of "not doing bad things" and "doing good"). The pandemic as the dawn of a new phase of anthropogenesis demonstrates the transformation of a man climbing and walking upright into a man sitting (in front of the screen) — Homo Sedens. With the development of civilization and the transition to intellectual work and a sedentary lifestyle, sight and hearing gain superiority. These organs are of remote perception, and in this sense, they meet the requirements of social distance and self-isolation that favour the preservation of man as a species. Physical sensitivity and tactility in the culture of Late Modern times have a paradoxical linkage with a change in the concepts of tact and decorum, with the ability to keep a distance, not to impose their views on another person. The author expects the consequence of the pandemic to be the movement of the frontier of civilization deep into the virtual worlds. Globalization is moving from an extroverted stage to an introverted one. The author concludes that when faced with a common danger that does not make national, ethnic, or religious distinctions, humankind becomes a concrete reality that one used to feel vague.