Panoramic Cone-beam Computed Tomography Images Research Articles

Comparison of mesiodistal root angulation of teeth by conventional panoramic and cone beam computed tomography images – A cross-sectional study

Accurate bracket positioning is required for proper root parallelism and for stable orthodontic treatment outcomes. This study aimed to determine the difference in mesiodistal root angulation of teeth measured on three radiographic images. A cross-sectional study was conducted using orthopantomogram (OPG), panoramic images of cone beam computed tomography (Pan-CBCT) and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). An occlusal plane was constructed in OPG and Pan-CBCT for angular measurements. The axial and sagittal views were used for assessing the mesiodistal root angulation on CBCT. Mesiodistal root angulation differences among three radiographs were assessed using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Mann-Whitney U test was applied for pairwise comparison and multinomial logistic regression was used to determine the association of sexual dimorphism with the direction of root angulation. On comparing the mesiodistal root angulation in degrees (DE) among all three groups, upper right (UR2) and left lateral incisors (UL2) were found to be statistically significant with P=0.033 and P=0.050 respectively. On pair-wise comparison, we found a statistically significant difference for upper right lateral incisor (UR2) between OPG and Pan-CBCT (P=0.045). Upper left lateral (UL2) (P=0.024) was significant in OPG and Pan-CBCT while upper left first molar (UL6) (P=0.043) in OPG and CBCT group. On comparing the sexual dimorphism in the direction of root angulation, females showed a greater tendency of mesial root angulation (5.62) times for upper right second premolar (UR5) as compared to males. There were no significant difference in mesiodistal root angulation between panoramic CBCT and CBCT images. The angulation of the upper lateral incisors was found to be significant between OPG and panoramic CBCT images, whereas the angulation of the upper right lateral incisors and left first molars was significant between OPG and CBCT images. In terms on sexual dimorphism, females showed greater mesial angulation of teeth than males.

Reliability and accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography voxel density and linear distance measurement at different voxel sizes: A study on sheep head cadaver

Background/purposeThe reliability and accuracy of linear distance and voxel density (VD) measurements are very important in dentistry. The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy and reliability of linear distances and VD measurements of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) at different voxel sizes. Materials and methodsEighteen-millimeter linears of size 40 gutta-percha were prepared in fresh sheep head. The head was scanned using CBCT with 0.25, 0.3, and 0.40 voxel sizes. Standard linear distances of gutta-percha were measured in panoramic CBCT images at 0.25, 0.3, and 0.4 voxel sizes. VD measurements were made separately on spongeous bone of palatal surfaces of the roots of teeth 4, 5, and 6 of maxilla and on cortical bone of teeth 4, 5, and 6 regions of the left and right hemimandibles through cross-sectional imaging. ResultsWe found that linear distance measurements on panoramic image of CBCT were slightly lower than physical measurements. A significant difference was not found for the gutta-percha linear distances and cortical VD measurements at different voxel sizes (P ≥ 0.05). The correlation between measurements of VD at different voxels in cortical bone was greater than 0.85 (P = 0.000). ConclusionLinear distance measurements on the sheep head cadaver of 0.25, 0.3, and 0.4 voxel sizes were similar and reliable when compared with physical measurements. In minimizing radiation exposure, VD measurement of cortical bone at 0.4 voxel-based CBCT could be used to estimate cortical bone density. However, studies should be performed on the human head cadaver.