ObjectiveThis study evaluates the RID-MyC (Rapid Identification of Mycoses using CRISPR) assay, a CRISPR/Cas12a-based diagnostic tool, for its efficacy in diagnosing fungal endophthalmitis (FE), comparing it with panfungal PCR and culture methods. DesignA comparative cross-sectional study assessing the performance of the RID-MyC assay against established diagnostic modalities for FE. SubjectsThe study included 133 intraocular samples from 117 patients with suspected microbial endophthalmitis. MethodsThe study compared the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of the RID-MyC assay against panfungal PCR and culture. The Limit of Detection (LoD) for Aspergillus flavus and Candida albicans was determined for both RID-MyC and panfungal PCR across three different media: nuclease-free water (NFW), aqueous humor (AH), and vitreous humor (VH). Discrepancy analysis was conducted for discordant results, incorporating clinical outcomes and responses to antifungal treatment. Main Outcome MeasuresThe study primarily assessed the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV for clinical samples. Time to diagnosis was also evaluated. ResultsThe RID-MyC assay demonstrated a sensitivity of 88.24% (CI: 63.56% to 98.54%) and specificity of 93.1% (CI: 86.86% to 96.98%), with PPV and NPV of 65.22% (CI: 48.45% to 78.91%) and 98.18% (CI: 93.62% to 99.50%), respectively. Discrepancy analysis enhanced sensitivity to 90.48% (CI: 69.62% to 98.83%) and specificity to 96.43% (CI: 91.11% to 99.02%). The RID-MyC assay was 10 to 1000-fold more sensitive than panfungal PCR in detecting Aspergillus flavus and Candida albicans in intraocular specimens. The time to diagnosis with the RID-MyC assay was consistently under two hours. ConclusionsThe RID-MyC assay may advance the rapid and precise diagnosis of FE, with possible relevance to other invasive fungal conditions.
Read full abstract