Pancreatoduodenectomy For Pancreatic Cancer Research Articles

Modified 5-Item Frailty Index (mFI-5) may predict postoperative outcomes after pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic Cancer.

Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC) primarily affects older individuals with diminished physiological reserves. The Modified 5-Item Frailty Index (mFI-5) is a novel risk stratification tool proposed to predict postoperative morbidity and mortality. This study aimed to validate the mFI-5 for predicting surgical outcomes in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) for PDAC. Our retrospective PDAC database included patients who underwent PD between 2014 and 2023. Patients were stratified by mFI-5 scores (0 best - 5 worst), which assess preoperative CHF, diabetes mellitus, history of COPD or pneumonia, functional health status, and hypertension requiring medication. Associations between mFI-5 scores and outcomes, including postoperative complications and mortality, were analyzed using logistic regression, Cox proportional hazards models, and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Among 250 PDAC patients undergoing PD, 142 (56.8%) had mFI-5 scores ≤ 1, and 25 (10%) had scores ≥ 3. No patients had scores > 4. Higher mFI-5 scores correlated with older age (p < 0.001) and tobacco use (p = 0.036). Multivariate analysis identified age (RR 1.02, p = 0.038), ASA class (ASA III; RR 2.61, p < 0.001; ASA IV; RR 2.63, p = 0.026), and moderate alcohol consumption (RR 0.56, p = 0.038) as frailty predictors. An mFI-5 score > 2 independently associated with higher mortality (HR 2.08, p = 0.026). Median overall survival was significantly lower for patients with mFI-5 scores > 2 than for those with scores ≤ 2 (21.3 vs. 42.1 months, p = 0.022). The mFI-5 is a valuable tool for predicting postoperative morbidity and mortality in PDAC patients undergoing PD. Integrating frailty assessment into preoperative evaluations can enhance patient selection and surgical outcomes. Future research should focus on incorporating frailty assessments into surgical planning and patient management to improve outcomes in this vulnerable population.

Body composition analysis using convolutional neural network in predicting postoperative pancreatic fistula and survival after pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer

PurposeTo evaluate whether body composition measurements acquired using convolutional neural networks (CNNs) from preoperative CT images could predict postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) and overall survival (OS) after pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Methods257 patients (160 men; median age [interquartile range], 67 [60–74]) who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy for PDAC between January 2013 and December 2017 were included in this retrospective study. Body composition measurements were based on a CNN trained to segment CT images into skeletal muscle area, visceral adipose tissue (VAT), and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT). Skeletal muscle area, VAT, and SAT were normalized to height square and labeled as skeletal muscle, VAT, and SAT indices, respectively. The independent risk factors for clinically relevant POPF (grade B or C) were determined using a multivariate logistic regression model, and prognostic factors for OS were assessed using Cox proportional hazards regression analyses. ResultsAfter pancreatioduodenectomy, 27 patients developed POPF grade B or C (10.5 %, 27/257). The VAT index (odds ratio [OR] = 7.43, p < 0.001) was the only independent prognostic factor for POPF grade B or C. During the median follow-up period of 23 months, 205 (79.8 % [205/257]) patients died. For prediction of OS, skeletal muscle index (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.58, p = 0.018) was a significant factor, along with vascular invasion (HR = 1.85, p < 0.001) and neoadjuvant therapy (HR = 0.58, p = 0.011). ConclusionsA high VAT index and a low skeletal muscle index can be utilized in predicting the occurrence of POPF grade B or C and poor OS, respectively.

Minimally invasive approaches in pancreatic cancer surgery

SummaryThis literature review reflects the present evidence on minimally invasive pancreatic surgery, differentiating between distal pancreatic resection and pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer. The review analyzed studies comparing minimally invasive and open pancreatic surgery in PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and the WHO Trial Register according to the following MeSH search strategy: MeSH items: pancreatic surgery, minimally invasive surgery, robotic surgery, laparoscopic surgery, pancreatoduodenectomy, and distal pancreatic resection. In systematic reviews and meta-analysis, minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MI-DP) has been shown to result in shorter hospital stays, less blood loss, and better quality of life than open distal resection (ODP) with similar morbidity and mortality. Meta-analyses have suggested similar oncological outcomes between the two approaches. Minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy (MI-PD) has been shown to offer advantages over open surgery, including shorter length of stay and less blood loss, by expert surgeons in several studies. However, these studies also reported longer operative times. As the procedure is technically demanding, only highly experienced pancreatic surgeons have performed MI-PD in most studies, so far limiting widespread recommendations. In addition, selection of cases for minimally invasive operations might currently influence the results. Registry studies from dedicated groups such as the European Consortium on Minimally Invasive Pancreatic Surgery (E-MIPS) and randomized controlled trials currently recruiting (DIPLOMA‑1 and 2, DISPACT-2) will bring more reliable data in the coming years. In conclusion, both MI-DP and MI-PD have shown some advantages over open surgery in terms of shorter hospital stays and reduced blood loss, but their effectiveness in terms of oncological outcomes is uncertain due to limited evidence. The study highlights the need for further randomized controlled trials with larger sample sizes and registry studies to further evaluate the safety, efficacy, and oncological outcomes of minimally invasive pancreatic resections.

Practice variation in venous resection during pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer: A nationwide cohort study

BackgroundPractice variation exists in venous resection during pancreatoduodenectomy, but little is known about the potential causes and consequences as large studies are lacking. This study explores the potential causes and consequences of practice variation in venous resection during pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer in the Netherlands. MethodsThis nationwide retrospective cohort study included patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer in 18 centers from 2013 through 2017. ResultsAmong 1,311 patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy, 351 (27%) had a venous resection, and the overall median annual center volume of venous resection was 4. No association was found between the center volume of pancreatoduodenectomy and the rate of venous resections, nor between patient and tumor characteristics and the rate of venous resections per center. Female sex, lower body mass index, neoadjuvant therapy, venous involvement, and stenosis on imaging were predictive for venous resection. Adjusted for these factors, 3 centers performed significantly more, and 3 centers performed significantly fewer venous resections than expected. In patients with venous resection, significantly less major morbidity (22% vs 38%) and longer overall survival (median 16 vs 12 months) were observed in centers with an above-median annual volume of venous resections (>4). ConclusionPatient and tumor characteristics did not explain significant practice variation between centers in the Netherlands in venous resection during pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer. The clinical outcomes of venous resection might be related to the volume of the procedure.

Nationwide Impact of Centralization, Neoadjuvant Therapy, Minimally Invasive Surgery, and Standardized Pathology Reporting on R0 Resection and Overall Survival in Pancreatoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Cancer

BackgroundSurgeons aim for R0 resection in patients with pancreatic cancer to improve overall survival. However, it is unclear whether recent changes in pancreatic cancer care such as centralization, increased use of neoadjuvant therapy, minimally invasive surgery, and standardized pathology reporting have influenced R0 resections and whether R0 resection remains associated with overall survival.MethodsThis nationwide retrospective cohort study included consecutive patients after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) for pancreatic cancer from the Netherlands Cancer Registry and the Dutch Nationwide Pathology Database (2009–2019). R0 resection was defined as > 1 mm tumor clearance at the pancreatic, posterior, and vascular resection margins. Completeness of pathology reporting was scored on the basis of six elements: histological diagnosis, tumor origin, radicality, tumor size, extent of invasion, and lymph node examination.ResultsAmong 2955 patients after PD for pancreatic cancer, the R0 resection rate was 49%. The R0 resection rate decreased from 68 to 43% (2009–2019, P < 0.001). The extent of resections in high-volume hospitals, minimally invasive surgery, neoadjuvant therapy, and complete pathology reports all significantly increased over time. Only complete pathology reporting was independently associated with lower R0 rates (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.69–0.83, P < 0.001). Higher hospital volume, neoadjuvant therapy, and minimally invasive surgery were not associated with R0. R0 resection remained independently associated with improved overall survival (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.66–0.79, P < 0.001), as well as in the 214 patients after neoadjuvant treatment (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.42–0.87, P = 0.007).ConclusionsThe nationwide rate of R0 resections after PD for pancreatic cancer decreased over time, mostly related to more complete pathology reporting. R0 resection remained associated with overall survival.

ASO Visual Abstract: Nationwide Impact of Centralization, Neoadjuvant Therapy, Minimally Invasive Surgery, and Standardized Pathology Reporting on R0 Resection and Overall Survival in Pancreatoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Cancer.

ASO Visual Abstract: Nationwide Impact of Centralization, Neoadjuvant Therapy, Minimally Invasive Surgery, and Standardized Pathology Reporting on R0 Resection and Overall Survival in Pancreatoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Cancer.

Patterns of Recurrence Following Pancreatoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Cancer: Results from the Recurrence After Whipple’s (RAW) International Retrospective Cohort Study

Patterns of Recurrence Following Pancreatoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Cancer: Results from the Recurrence After Whipple’s (RAW) International Retrospective Cohort Study

Predictors of Local-only Recurrence Following Pancreatoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Cancer: Results from the Recurrence After Whipple’s (RAW) International Cohort Study

Predictors of Local-only Recurrence Following Pancreatoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Cancer: Results from the Recurrence After Whipple’s (RAW) International Cohort Study

Positive Resected Lymph Nodes and Long-term Survival after Pancreatoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Cancer: Results from the Recurrence after Whipple’s (RAW) Study

Positive Resected Lymph Nodes and Long-term Survival after Pancreatoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Cancer: Results from the Recurrence after Whipple’s (RAW) Study

HPB P67 Patterns of recurrence after pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer and the effect of palliative chemotherapy on survival

Abstract Background Pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) is recommended in fit patients with suspected early pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) affecting the pancreatic head. Unfortunately, recurrence rates are high and only a minority achieve long-term survival. This study aimed to study the patterns of recurrence in patients who undergo PD for PDAC and investigate the impact of palliative chemotherapy on survival. Methods Data was extracted from the Recurrence After Whipple's (RAW) study, a multicentre retrospective cohort study of outcomes following PD performed for pancreatic head malignancy (29 centres in 8 countries, n=1,484). Patients with PDAC who developed recurrence within five years of their operation were identified. The site of recurrence and details of palliative chemotherapy (if any) was recorded for each patient. Overall survival (OS) and time from recurrence to time of death was compared between those that received palliative chemotherapy and those that did not using the Mann-Whitney U test. Results In total, 885 patients (59.4%) had PDAC. Excluding the 37 patients who died within 90-days, 583 (68.8%) developed recurrent disease within five years (on imaging). The median number of months from time of surgery to time of recurrence was ten months (range: 0–58). Of those with recurrence, 30.4% had local recurrence only, 28.4% had local and distal recurrence, and 41.7% had distant recurrence only. The most common sites of recurrence were the liver (40.7%), the superior mesenteric artery area (33.3%), locoregional lymph nodes (20.2%), the omentum/peritoneum (14.9%), the pancreatic anastomosis site (11.8%), the superior mesenteric vein/portal vein area (10.8%), and the coeliac trunk area (9.4%). Among those with recurrence, 46.1% received palliative chemotherapy. The median number of cycles was four (range: 1–12). Just 41.2% of patients completed their planned course; 28.0% stopped their treatment due to disease progression and 17.4% stopped their treatment due to toxicity. Patients who received palliative chemotherapy had similar median OS to those who did not (both 18 months, p=0.6), however, time from recurrence to time of death was significantly longer in the former (9 vs 3 months, p&amp;lt;0.0001). Conclusions In our multicentre study, over two thirds of PD patients with PDAC developed disease recurrence within five-years of their operation. Just under half of these received palliative chemotherapy. Time from recurrence to time of death was significantly longer in those who did receive palliative chemotherapy.

Should the Splenic Vein Be Preserved-Fate of Sinistral Portal Hypertension after Pancreatoduodenectomy with Vascular Re-Section for Pancreatic Cancer.

Simple SummaryThis study aims to evaluate sinistral portal hypertension (SPH) development and its clinical impact on the long-term outcomes of patients with pancreatic cancer who underwent surgical resection with splenic vein (SV) ligation. Data from 94 consecutive patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) with vascular resection for pancreatic cancer were divided into two groups according to SV ligation, and the groups were compared. Variceal score in the SV ligation group was significantly higher than that in the SV saving group at the same postoperative periods, and clinically relevant variceal bleeding was noted in one patient from the SV ligation group. In survival analysis, there was no significant difference between the two groups. These results showed that although SV ligation induced SPH during PD for pancreatic cancer, it did not lead to clinically significant long-term complications. In addition, it did not impact the long-term survival of patients with resected pancreatic head cancer.Background: This study aims to evaluate sinistral portal hypertension (SPH) development and its clinical impact on the long-term outcomes of patients with pancreatic cancer who underwent surgical resection with splenic vein (SV) ligation. Methods: Data from 94 consecutive patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) with vascular resection for pancreatic cancer from 2008 to 2019 were retrospectively collected. The patients were divided into two groups according to whether the SV was preserved or ligated during the surgery. Their computed tomography images were serially reviewed (preoperative, 6-, 12-, and 24-months postoperative) with clinical parameters. The degree of variceal formation (variceal score) and splenomegaly were assessed, and the oncologic outcomes were compared between the two groups. Variceal score in the SV ligation group was significantly higher than that in the SV saving group at the same postoperative periods (SV saving vs. ligation: 12 months, 0.9 ± 1.3 vs. 3.5 ± 2.2, p < 0.001; 24 months, 1.4 ± 1.8 vs. 4.0 ± 3.4, p = 0.009). Clinically relevant variceal bleeding was noted in one patient from the SV ligation group (SV saving vs. ligation: 0.0% vs. 3.1%, p = 0.953). In survival analysis, there was no significant difference between the two groups (DFS; SV saving vs. ligation: 13.0 (11.1–14.9) months vs. 13.0 (10.4–15.6) months, p = 0.969, OS; SV saving vs. ligation: 35.0 (19.9–50.1) months vs. 27.0 (11.6–42.4) months, p = 0.417). Although SV ligation induced SPH during PD for pancreatic cancer, it did not lead to clinically significant long-term complications. In addition, it did not impact the long-term survival of patients with resected pancreatic head cancer.

Comment on: Venous wedge and segment resection during pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer: impact on short- and long-term outcomes in a nationwide cohort analysis.

Comment on: Venous wedge and segment resection during pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer: impact on short- and long-term outcomes in a nationwide cohort analysis.

Author response to: Venous wedge and segment resection during pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer: impact on short- and long-term outcomes in a nationwide cohort analysis.

Author response to: Venous wedge and segment resection during pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer: impact on short- and long-term outcomes in a nationwide cohort analysis.

Long-Term Outcome of Patients with Postoperative Refractory Diarrhea After Tailored Nerve Plexus Dissection Around the Major Visceral Arteries During Pancreatoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Cancer.

For pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) surgery, extended dissection of the nerve plexus (pl) around the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) or celiac artery (CA) is sometimes necessary. This consequently results in postoperative refractory diarrhea. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical impact of extended nerve plexus dissection around major arteries on postoperative diarrhea. Patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) for PDAC between January 2013 and December 2016 were included. The frequency of diarrhea (defined as a condition requiring opioid antidiarrheal drug for at least 6months after surgery) and its short- and long-term outcomes were reviewed. Of 200 consecutive patients who underwent PD, 78 (39.0%) developed postoperative refractory diarrhea (diarrhea group), and 73 of them (93.6%) underwent hemi-circumferential or more nerve dissection for SMA or CA; both plSMA and plCA dissection were associated with diarrhea. Borderline resectable artery (BR-A) PDAC was included more in the diarrhea group (32.0% vs. 13.1%, P = 0.001); however, the local recurrence rate in the diarrhea group was significantly lower than that in the non-diarrhea group (14.1% vs. 26.2%, P = 0.036). The completion of adjuvant chemotherapy and overall survival were comparable between the two groups. The pre-albumin level improved in 2years, and 61.3% of patients with diarrhea could stop opioid antidiarrheal drugs within 3years of surgery. Although the frequency of diarrhea increased following nerve plexus dissection around arteries, diarrhea was controllable and resulted in a reduced local recurrence rate. Aggressive dissection of the nerve plexus may be justified for local disease control in BR-A PDAC.

Multicenter Randomized Phase II Trial of Prophylactic Right-Half Dissection of Superior Mesenteric Artery Nerve Plexus in Pancreatoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Head Cancer

Introduction: Right-half dissection of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) nerve plexus in pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer was initiated to accomplish R0 resection; however, subsequent refractory diarrhea was a major concern. This study aimed to evaluate the necessity of this technique. Method: From April 2014 to June 2018, 74 patients with pancreatic head cancer were randomly allocated to either Group A, in which right-half dissection of the SMA nerve plexus was performed (n = 37), or Group B, in which total preservation of the nerve plexus was performed (n = 37). Short-term, long-term, and survival outcomes were prospectively compared between the groups. Results: The patient demographics, including the R0 resection rate, were not significantly different between the groups. Postoperative diarrhea occurred in 26 (70.3%) patients in Group A and 18 (48.6%) patients in Group B. There was a tendency for the development of severe diarrhea in Group A within 1 year postoperatively, and the frequency of diarrhea gradually decreased within 2 years, although that did not affect tolerance to adjuvant chemotherapy. There was no difference in either locoregional recurrence (27.0% vs. 32.4%) or systemic recurrence (46.0% vs. 46.0%). The median overall survival time in Groups A and B was 37.9 and 34.6 months, respectively (P = 0.77). Conclusions: We did not demonstrate a clinical impact of right-half dissection of the SMA nerve plexus on locoregional recurrence or survival. Therefore, the prophylactic dissection of the SMA nerve plexus is unnecessary, given that refractory diarrhea could be induced by this technique (UMIN000012241).

Venous wedge and segment resection during pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer: impact on short- and long-term outcomes in a nationwide cohort analysis.

Venous resection of the superior mesenteric or portal vein is increasingly performed in pancreatic cancer surgery, whereas results of studies on short- and long-term outcomes are contradictory. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of the type of venous resection in pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer on postoperative morbidity and overall survival. This nationwide retrospective cohort study included all patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer in 18 centres (2013-2017). A total of 1311 patients were included, of whom 17 per cent underwent wedge resection and 10 per cent segmental resection. Patients with segmental resection had higher rates of major morbidity (39 versus 20 versus 23 per cent, respectively; P < 0.001) and portal or superior mesenteric vein thrombosis (18 versus 5 versus 1 per cent, respectively; P < 0.001) and worse overall survival (median 12 versus 16 versus 20 months, respectively; P < 0.001), compared to patients with wedge resection and those without venous resection. Multivariable analysis showed patients with segmental resection, but not those who had wedge resection, had higher rates of major morbidity (odds ratio = 1.93, 95 per cent c.i. 1.20 to 3.11) and worse overall survival (hazard ratio = 1.40, 95 per cent c.i. 1.10 to 1.78), compared to patients without venous resection. Among patients who received neoadjuvant therapy, there was no difference in overall survival among patients with segmental and wedge resection and those without venous resection (median 32 versus 25 versus 33 months, respectively; P = 0.470), although there was a difference in major morbidity rates (52 versus 19 versus 21 per cent, respectively; P = 0.012). In pancreatic surgery, the short- and long-term outcomes are worse in patients with venous segmental resection, compared to patients with wedge resection and those without venous resection.

Robotic pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer with aberrant vasculature: How to do it

Robotic pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer with aberrant vasculature: How to do it

Positive neck margin at frozen section analysis is a significant preditor of tumour recurrence and poor survival after pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer

Positive neck margin at frozen section analysis is a significant preditor of tumour recurrence and poor survival after pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer

An anatomical review of various superior mesenteric artery-first approaches during pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer.

When pancreatic head cancer invades the superior mesenteric artery (SMA), attempts at curative resection are aborted. Preoperative imaging diagnostics to determine the surgical curability have yet to surpass the intraoperative information acquired via inspection, palpation, and trial dissection. Pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) is a standard measure for treating periampullary cancers. In conventional PD, SMA invasion is usually identified by dissecting the retroportal lamina, which connects the uncinate process and SMA nerve plexus after dividing the neck of the pancreas. During PD for pancreatic head cancer, this retroperitoneal margin frequently vitiates surgical curability. SMA-first approaches during PD are methods where the SMA is dissected first by severing the posterior pancreatic capsule to assess the SMA involvement of pancreatic cancer early in the operation. The first report of such an approach prompted subsequent reports of various maneuvers that are now known collectively as "artery-first" approaches. We herein review those approaches by classifying them according to (1) the side of the mesocolon from where the SMA approach occurs (supracolic or infracolic) and (2) the direction of access (right or left and anterior or posterior). The steps of the reported PD procedures are numbered according to a timeline and summarized using anatomical division of the SMA.

Multicenter randomized phase II trial of prophylactic right-half dissection of superior mesenteric artery nerve plexus in pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic head cancer.

AimRight‐half dissection of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) nerve plexus in pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer was initiated to accomplish R0 resection; however, subsequent refractory diarrhea was a major concern. This study aimed to evaluate the necessity of this technique.MethodsFrom April 2014 to June 2018, 74 patients with pancreatic head cancer were randomly allocated to either Group A, in which right‐half dissection of the SMA nerve plexus was performed (n = 37), or Group B, in which total preservation of the nerve plexus was performed (n = 37). Short‐term, long‐term, and survival outcomes were prospectively compared between the groups.ResultsThe patient demographics, including the R0 resection rate, were not significantly different between the groups. Postoperative diarrhea occurred in 26 (70.3%) patients in Group A and 18 (48.6%) patients in Group B. There was a tendency for the development of severe diarrhea in Group A within 1 year postoperatively, and the frequency of diarrhea gradually decreased within 2 years, although that did not affect tolerance to adjuvant chemotherapy. There was no difference in either locoregional recurrence (27.0% vs 32.4%) or systemic recurrence (46.0% vs 46.0%). The median overall survival time in Groups A and B was 37.9 and 34.6 months, respectively (P = 0.77).ConclusionWe did not demonstrate a clinical impact of right‐half dissection of the SMA nerve plexus on locoregional recurrence or survival. Therefore, the prophylactic dissection of the SMA nerve plexus is unnecessary given that refractory diarrhea could be induced by this technique (UMIN000012241).