Pancreatic Body Cancer Research Articles

Impact of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration on positive peritoneal lavage cytology in patients with resectable pancreatic body and tail cancer.

A recent study has demonstrated that the timing of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) significantly influences the peritoneal lavage cytology (CY) outcomes in pancreatic body-tail cancer. The aim of this study was to clarify the impact of EUS-FNA on CY positivity in patients with resectable pancreatic body-tail cancer. Patients with anatomically resectable pancreatic body-tail cancer surgically resected at Hiroshima University Hospital were enrolled, and elated clinicopathological factors, including EUS-FNA variables and CY positivity rate, were analyzed. Of the 129 eligible patients, 16 (12%) had positive CY. The EUS-FNA rates of the CY-positive and CY-negative groups were not significantly different (63% vs. 52%, p = .440). Multivariate analysis revealed that lymph node metastasis was the only independent risk factor for CY positivity (odds ratio: 5.734, p = .031). A total of 10 (14%) of the 69 patients who underwent EUS-FNA had positive CY; however, needle specifications and the interval between EUS-FNA and CY examination did not differ between the CY-positive and CY-negative groups. CY positivity rates were comparable for intervals ≤14 days and ≥15 days (17% vs. 14%, p = 1.000). EUS-FNA may not affect CY positivity in patients with resectable pancreatic body-tail cancer, regardless of the timing.

A case of acute obstructive suppurative pancreatic ductitis complicated by pancreatic body cancer

A case of acute obstructive suppurative pancreatic ductitis complicated by pancreatic body cancer

Successful treatment for pseudoaneurysm following distal pancreatectomy with celiac axis resection without postoperative pancreatic fistula: a case report

BackgroundDistal pancreatectomy with celiac axis resection (DP–CAR) represents an innovative surgical approach for locally advanced pancreatic body cancer in cases involving celiac axis invasion. However, this procedure carries significant perioperative risks, including arterial aneurysms and organ ischemia. Understanding these risks is crucial for optimizing patient outcomes and guiding treatment decisions.Case presentationThis case report describes a unique case of a 74-year-old male patient who was diagnosed with locally advanced pancreatic body cancer with invasion of the celiac and splenic arteries. He underwent DP–CAR after six cycles of chemotherapy. His postoperative course was uneventful without any evidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula. However, at the 10-month postoperative follow-up, pseudoaneurysm was incidentally detected in the anterior superior pancreaticoduodenal artery by follow-up computed tomography. It was successfully treated with coil embolization. He had no signs of tumor recurrence or relapse of pseudoaneurysm formation 2 years postoperatively. This case report discusses the potential risks of pseudoaneurysm formation in patients undergoing DP–CAR due to hemodynamic changes. We emphasize the significance of close monitoring in such cases.ConclusionsThe case highlights the importance of recognizing and managing potential complications associated with DP–CAR in patients with pancreatic cancer. Despite its effectiveness in achieving complete resection, DP–CAR carries inherent risks, including the development of pseudoaneurysms. Vigilant surveillance and prompt intervention are crucial for optimizing patient outcomes and minimizing postoperative complications.

Periarterial and Sub-adventitial Divestment Along with Triangle Operation and RAMPS for Pancreatic Body Cancer

BackgroundLocally advanced cancers of the pancreatic body can abut or involve the celiac axis, hepatic artery, or superior mesenteric artery. Recent evidence suggests that these tumors are amenable to surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (Hackert et al., Locally advanced pancreaticcancer: neoadjuvant therapy with FOLFIRINOX results inresectability in 60 % of the patients. Ann Surg 264:457–463, 2016; Rangelova et al., Surgery improves survival after neoadjuvant therapy for borderline and locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a single-institution experience. Ann Surg 273:579–86, 2021). An arterial divestment technique can be used for these cancers to get an R0 clearance, thereby avoiding morbid arterial resections (Miao et al., Arterial divestment instead of resection for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). Pancreatology 16:S59, 2016; Habib et al., Periadventitial dissection of the superior mesenteric artery for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: surgical planning with the “halo sign” and “string sign.” Surgery 169(5):1026–1031, 2021; Diener et al., Periarterial divestmentin pancreatic cancer surgery. Surgery 169(5):1026–31, 2020). Two techniques are described for arterial divestment. In the periarterial divestment technique, the plane of the dissection is between the tumor and the adventitia (Habib et al., Periadventitial dissection of the superior mesenteric artery for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: surgical planning with the “halo sign” and “string sign.” Surgery 169(5):1026–1031, 2021; Diener et al., Periarterial divestmentin pancreatic cancer surgery. Surgery 169(5):1026–31, 2020). In sub-adventitial dissection, the plane of dissection is between the tunica adventitia and the external elastic lamina (Gao et al., Sub-adventitial divestment technique for resecting artery-involved pancreatic cancer: a retrospective cohort study. Langenbecks Arch Surg 406:691–701, 2021). The TRIANGLE operation also is one of the surgical techniques to achieve R0 resection in locally advanced pancreatic cancer (Hackert et al., The TRIANGLE operation: radical surgery after neoadjuvant treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer: a single-arm observational study. HPB Oxford 19:1001–1007, 2017). This multimedia article aims to demonstrate peri-arterial and sub-adventitial divestment techniques as well as the TRIANGLE operation for a locally advanced cancer of the body of the pancreas. The video also highlights the technique of posterior radical antegrade modular pancreato-splenectomy (RAMPS) together with lymph node clearance.Patient and MethodsA 57-year-old women was detected to have pancreatic body adenocarcinoma with tumor contact of the artery and superior mesenteric artery. After neoadjuvant chemotherapy, she was planned to undergo surgical resection.ResultsThe surgical technique consisted of peri-arterial and sub-adventitial divestment, the TRIANGLE operation and RAMPS (Fig. 1). The procedure was performed within 240 min and involved blood loss of 250 mL. After the procedure, pancreatic leak (POPF-B), chyle leak and diarrhea developed, which were managed conservatively. The final histopathology showed residual, viable, moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma (ypT2N1M0) with all resection margins free.ConclusionThe surgical technique consisting of peri-arterial and sub-adventitial divestment, the TRIANGLE operation and RAMPS helps in R0 resection of locally advanced pancreatic body cancer without any compromise in oncologic outcomes and offers an alternative surgical approach to morbid arterial resection.

Comparison of Survival Outcomes between Radical Antegrade Modular Pancreatosplenectomy and Conventional Distal Pancreatosplenectomy for Pancreatic Body and Tail Cancer: Korean Multicenter Propensity Score Match Analysis.

(1) Background: The aim of this study was to compare the survival benefit of radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) with conventional distal pancreatosplenectomy (cDPS) in left-sided pancreatic cancer. (2) Methods: A retrospective propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was conducted on 333 patients who underwent RAMPS or cDPS for left-sided pancreatic cancer at four tertiary cancer centers. The study assessed prognostic factors and compared survival and operative outcomes. (3) Results: After PSM, 99 patients were matched in each group. RAMPS resulted in a higher retrieved lymph node count than cDPS (15.0 vs. 10.0, p < 0.001). No significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of R0 resection rate, blood loss, hospital stay, or morbidity. The 5-year overall survival rate was similar in both groups (cDPS vs. RAMPS, 44.4% vs. 45.2%, p = 0.853), and disease-free survival was also comparable. Multivariate analysis revealed that ASA score, preoperative CA19-9, histologic differentiation, R1 resection, adjuvant treatment, and lymphovascular invasion were significant prognostic factors for overall survival. Preoperative CA19-9, histologic differentiation, T-stage, adjuvant treatment, and lymphovascular invasion were independent significant prognostic factors for disease-free survival. (4) Conclusions: Although RAMPS resulted in a higher retrieved lymph node count, survival outcomes were not different between the two groups. RAMPS was a surgical option to achieve R0 resection rather than a standard procedure.

The preliminary analysis of lymphatic flow around the connective tissues surrounding SMA and SpA elucidates patients’ oncological condition in borderline-resectable pancreatic cancer

BackgroundIn pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), invasion of connective tissues surrounding major arteries is a crucial prognostic factor after radical resection. However, why the connective tissues invasion is associated with poor prognosis is not well understood.Materials and methodsFrom 2018 to 2020, 25 patients receiving radical surgery for PDAC in our institute were enrolled. HyperEye Medical System (HEMS) was used to examine lymphatic flow from the connective tissues surrounding SMA and SpA and which lymph nodes ICG accumulated in was examined.ResultsHEMS imaging revealed ICG was transported down to the paraaortic area of the abdominal aorta along SMA. In pancreatic head cancer, 9 paraaortic lymph nodes among 14 (64.3%) were ICG positive, higher positivity than LN#15 (25.0%) or LN#18 (50.0%), indicating lymphatic flow around the SMA was leading directly to the paraaortic lymph nodes. Similarly, in pancreatic body and tail cancer, the percentage of ICG-positive LN #16a2 was very high, as was that of #8a, although that of #7 was only 42.9%.ConclusionsOur preliminary result indicated that the lymphatic flow along the connective tissues surrounding major arteries could be helpful in understanding metastasis and improving prognosis in BR-A pancreatic cancer.

Increased risk of multiple metastases and worse overall survival of metastatic pancreatic body and tail cancer: a retrospective cohort study.

Pancreatic cancer (PC) is a lethal disease, especially metastatic PC. And it can be divided into two types: head pancreatic cancer (H-PC) and body and tail pancreatic cancer (BT-PC). Prior studies have proved that they have different overall survival (OS) and should be regarded as two different categories of PC. At present, there remains a gap in the field regarding OS across different primary tumor locations and metastatic sites, as well as the metastatic patterns associated with various primary tumor locations in patients with metastatic PC. Thus, our study aims to address this gap by analyzing data from a large population sourced from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The different prognosis of different primary tumor locations and metastatic sites may indicate that different primary locations and metastatic sites may require different therapy and follow-up strategy. It is hoped that these findings will lay the groundwork for future guideline updates and related research. Patients with pathologically confirmed stage IV metastatic PC from the National Cancer Institute's SEER program between 2010 and 2015 were included, excluding patients with various tumors, without specifying age, specific sites of metastasis, or OS. Data including age, race, gender, tumor size, T stage, N stage, grade, sites, number of metastatic sites, surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy and years of diagnoses were collected from the SEER database. OS was defined as the period from initial diagnosis to the date of death. Specific metastatic sites for the different primary locations of tumor were compared. Survival was analyzed by Cox regression analyses. Overall, 14,406 patients with metastatic PC were included in this research (7,104 of H-PC and 7,302 of BT-PC). Gender proportion, tumor size, T stage, N stage, number of metastatic sites surgery of the primary lesions and radiotherapy were different between BT-PC and H-PC. The proportion of only 1 metastatic site was 68.3% in H-PC compared with 58.3% in the BT-PC. The BT-PC was an independent risk factor for liver metastases compared with the H-PC [odds ratio (OR) =1.510; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.320-1.727]. No matter for those with multiple metastases, or for those with solitary liver or lung metastases, patients with metastatic H-PC showed better OS (P<0.001, P=0.001, P=0.04, respectively). In patients with solitary liver metastases, worse OS was observed in the BT-PC than the H-PC [hazard ratio (HR) =1.109; 95% CI: 1.046-1.175]. The metastatic BT-PC had worse OS and increased risk to suffer from liver and multiple metastases. Moreover, in patients with solitary metastases, those with liver metastases presented poorest survival.

Morphology of the Dorsal Pancreatic Artery and Its Oncological Significance in Pancreatic Cancer.

Although the dorsal pancreatic artery (DPA) is an important artery that supplies the pancreas, its morphology has not been sufficiently studied. We investigated the morphology of the DPA and the progression of pancreatic cancer along this vessel. Overall, 142 patients with pancreatic cancer who underwent surgical resection at Kanazawa University Hospital between 2004 and 2015 were enrolled. We examined the morphology of the DPA using preoperative computed tomography and cancer progression along the DPA using resected specimens. We investigated the anatomical structures surrounding the DPA through cadaveric examination. The analysis of computed tomography images revealed the presence of the DPA in 141 patients. In typical cases, the DPA divides into a head and a body branch. Histopathological examination revealed cancer progression along the DPA in 32 patients. Cancer progression along the DPA was identified as a factor associated with a poor prognosis in pancreatic head or body cancer. Cadaveric examination showed the presence of abundant nerve and lymphatic tissues along the DPA. It is important to remove the soft tissue surrounding the DPA during surgery for pancreatic head or body cancer because it may serve as an important route for cancer progression.

Impact of radiological and pathological splenic vein involvement in patients with resectable pancreatic body or tail cancer.

Several studies have reported a negative impact on survival associated with splenic vessel involvement, especially splenic artery (SpA) involvement, in patients diagnosed with pancreatic body or tail cancer. However, there is limited research on splenic vein (SpV) involvement. Therefore, we aimed to elucidate the significance of splenic vessel involvement, especially SpV involvement, in patients with resectable pancreatic body or tail cancer. Between January 2007 and December 2021, 116 consecutive patients underwent distal pancreatectomies for pancreatic body or tail cancer. Among them, this study specifically examined 88 patients with resectable pancreatic body or tail cancer to elucidate prognostic factors using a multivariable Cox proportional analysis. The Kaplan-Meier method evaluated the impact of SpV involvement in terms of both radiological and pathological aspects and the efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy. Higher pre-operative carcinoembryonic antigen levels, larger tumour size, pathological SpV invasion, and non-completion of adjuvant therapy were identified as independent poor prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Additionally, patients with radiological SpV encasement had significantly worse prognoses in terms of OS (p = 0.039) and RFS (p < 0.001). The sensitivity and specificity of multidetector-row computed tomography for detecting pathological SpV invasion were 81.0% and 61.2%, respectively. However, the prognostic impact of neoadjuvant therapy could not be determined, regardless of radiological SpV involvement. Radiological and pathological SpV involvement is a poor prognostic factor for patients with resectable pancreatic body or tail cancer. New innovative treatments and effective neoadjuvant therapy regimens are required for patients with SpV involvement.

Multicenter retrospective study on prognostic factors in resected pancreatic body cancer

Multicenter retrospective study on prognostic factors in resected pancreatic body cancer

Technical strategy for advanced pancreatic body cancers with portal resection

Technical strategy for advanced pancreatic body cancers with portal resection

Diagnosis of pancreatic head cancer with prominent fatty change in the pancreatic body using 3 Tesla-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: A case report

Introduction: Pancreatic cancer is the seventh leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, and early diagnosis is necessary to obtain a favorable postoperative prognosis. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography is generally recommended when pancreatic cancer is suspected. Herein, we present a case in which contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging was used to detect pancreatic cancer, while contrast-enhanced computed tomography and endoscopic ultrasonography were unable to reveal possible pancreatic cancer. Case Report: We present a case of a man in his 70s whose diabetes had worsened, and the main pancreatic duct was dilated, with suspicion of pancreatic cancer. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography did not reveal a tumor that indicated possible pancreatic cancer, and endoscopic ultrasonography exhibited similar findings. Therefore, 3 Tesla-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging was performed to make an image diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. Conclusion: In lesions exhibiting invasive growth accompanied by prominent fatty change in the pancreatic body, obtaining the contrast effect of adipose tissue by contrast computed tomography is difficult. In addition, an association between prominent fatty change in the pancreatic body and pancreatic cancer has been reported. Therefore, we performed 3 Tesla-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging examination, which tends to yield favorable tissue contrast on adipose tissue images.

Prognostic impact of the distance from the root of splenic artery to tumor in the patients with pancreatic body or tail cancer

BackgroundThe impact of the distance from the root of splenic artery to tumor (DST) on the prognosis and optimal surgical procedures in the patients with pancreatic body/tail cancer has been unclear. MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 94 patients who underwent distal pancreatectomy (DP) and 17 patients who underwent DP with celiac axis resection (DP-CAR) between 2008 and 2018. ResultsThe 111 patients were assigned by DST length (in mm) as DST = 0: n = 14, 0<DST≤10: n = 18, and 10<DST: n = 79. The median overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) did not significantly differ in each group. A multivariate analysis showed that DST was not an independent prognostic factor for both RFS and OS. DP-CAR did not improve the prognosis in the DST = 0 and the 0<DST≤10 groups. In the DST = 0 group, neoadjuvant therapy significantly decreased distant metastasis (P = 0.025) and improve the overall survival (P = 0.046). ConclusionsDST did not affect prognosis in patients with pancreatic body/tail cancer. Neoadjuvant therapy followed by DP may be desirable for patients with a DST = 0 tumor. For those with a 0<DST≤10 tumor, DP may be suitable; DP-CAR is an alternative when ligation and dissection of the root of the splenic artery are difficult or not possible.

ASO Author Reflections: Surgical Strategies for Pancreatic Body Cancers with Portal Vein Involvement: Distal Pancreatectomy or Pancreaticoduodenectomy?

ASO Author Reflections: Surgical Strategies for Pancreatic Body Cancers with Portal Vein Involvement: Distal Pancreatectomy or Pancreaticoduodenectomy?

Technical Strategy for Pancreatic Body Cancers: A Raison d'etre of Distal Pancreatectomy with Portal Resection.

Advancements in multiagent chemotherapy have expanded the surgical indications for pancreatic cancer. Although pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) with portal vein resection (PVR) has become widely adopted, distal pancreatectomy (DP) with PVR remains rarely performed because of its technical complexity. This study was designed to assess the feasibility of DP-PVR compared with PD-PVR for pancreatic body cancers, with a focus on PV complications and providing optimal reconstruction techniques when DP-PVR is necessary. A retrospective review was conducted on consecutive pancreatic body cancer patients who underwent pancreatectomy with PVR between 2005 and 2020.An algorithm based on the anatomical relationship between the arteries and PV was used for optimal surgical selection. Among 119 patients, 32 underwent DP-PVR and 87 underwent PD-PVR. Various reconstruction techniques were employed in DP-PVR cases, including patch reconstruction, graft interposition, and wedge resection. The majority of PD-PVR cases involved end-to-end anastomosis. The length of PVR was shorter in DP-PVR (25 vs. 40 mm; p < 0.001). Although Clavien-Dindo ≥3a was higher in DP-PVR (p = 0.002), inpatient mortality and R0 status were similar. Complete PV occlusion occurred more frequently in DP-PVR than in PD-PVR (21.9% vs. 1.1%; p < 0.001). A cutoff value of 30 mm for PVR length was determined to be predictive of nonrecurrence-related PV occlusion after DP-PVR. The two groups did not differ significantly in recurrence or overall survival. DP-PVR had higher occlusion and postoperative complication rates than PD-PVR. These findings support the proposed algorithm and emphasize the importance of meticulous surgical manipulation when DP-PVR is deemed necessary.

Impact of endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition on prognosis in resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic body and tail cancer

Impact of endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition on prognosis in resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic body and tail cancer

Central pancreatectomy might be an acceptable surgical procedure for clinical T1 pancreatic body ductal adenocarcinoma: A multicenter retrospective analysis.

Central pancreatectomy (CP) is accepted as a function-preserving procedure for benign tumors. However, the indication of CP for pancreatic cancers is limited. This multicenter study aimed to clarify the indications of CP for clinical T1 pancreatic body cancer. This multicenter study analyzed patients who underwent CP or distal pancreatectomy (DP) for clinical T1 pancreatic body cancer between 2013 and 2020 at three high-volume centers. A total of 50 patients were enrolled: nine patients, who underwent CP, were classified into the CP group, while 38 patients, who underwent DP, served as controls. Three patients converted CP to DP during operation were excluded. Five patients in the CP group and 15 patients in the control group underwent preoperative treatment. The 5-year survival rate was 100% in the CP group, and 42% (p = .040) in the control group. Recurrence was found in three patients in the CP group. Importantly, insulin was not required after surgery in patients in the CP group. The clinical outcomes of CP were comparable to or even better than that of conventional pancreatectomy. Our collaborative study suggests that CP may be an acceptable therapeutic option for selected patients with clinical T1 pancreatic body cancer.

Distal pancreatectomy with celiac axis resection for pancreatic body cancer: a single center review of 89 consecutive cases

Objective: To investigate the clinical efficacy of distal pancreatectomy with celiac axis resection(DP-CAR). Methods: A total of 89 consecutive patients (50 males and 39 females) who were diagnosed with pancreatic body cancer and underwent DP-CAR in Pancreas Center,First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University between September 2013 and June 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. There were 50 males and 39 females,with age(M(IQR)) of 63(12) years(range:43 to 81 years). Perioperative parameters,pathology results and follow-up data of these patients were analyzed,χ2 or Fisher's test for categorical data while the Wilcoxon test for quantitative data. Survival results were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier survival method. Results: Among 89 cases,cases combined with portal vein-superior mesenteric vein or organ resection accounted for 22.5% (20/89) and 42.7% (38/89),respectively. The operative time,blood loss and postoperative hospital stay were 270 (110) minutes,300 (300) ml and 13 (10) days,respectively. The overall morbidity rate was 67.4% (60/89) while the major morbidity was 11.2% (10/89). The increase rate in transient liver enzymes was 42.7% (38/89),3.4% (3/89) for liver failure,53.9% (48/89) for clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula,1.1% (1/89) for bile leak,3.4% (3/89) for chylous leak of grade B and C,11.2% (10/89) for abdominal infection,9.0% (8/89) for postoperative hemorrhage of grade B and C,4.5% (4/89) for delayed gastric emptying,6.7% (6/89) for deep vein thrombosis,3.4% (3/89) for reoperation,4.5% (4/89)for hospital mortality,7.9% (7/89) for 90-day mortality. The pathological type was pancreatic cancer for all 89 cases and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma made up 92.1% (82/89). The tumor size was 4.8(2.0) cm, ranging from 1.5 to 12.0 cm. The number of lymph nodes harvested was 14 (13)(range:2 to 33),with a positive lymph node rate of 13.0% (24.0%). The resection R0 rate was 30.0% (24/80) and the R1 (<1 mm) rate was 58.8% (47/80). The median overall survival time was 21.3 months (95%CI: 15.6 to 24.3) and the median disease-free survival time was 19.1 months (95%CI: 11.7 to 25.1). The overall survival at 1-year and 2-year were 69.60% and 39.52%. The median survival time of 58 patients with adjuvant chemotherapy was 24.3 months (95%CI: 17.8 to 32.3) while that of 13 patients without any kind of adjuvant therapy was 8.4 months (95%CI: 7.3 to 22.3). Seven patients accepted neoadjuvant chemotherapy and there was no significant morbidity among them,with a resection rate of R0 of 5/7. Conclusion: DP-CAR is safe and feasible for selective cases,which could be more valuable in improving long-term survival when combined with (neo) adjuvant therapy.

Insights from managing clinical issues in distal pancreatectomy with en bloc coeliac axis resection: experiences from 626 patients.

Distal pancreatectomy with en bloc coeliac axis resection (DP-CAR) for pancreatic body cancer has been reported increasingly. However, its large-scale outcomes remain undocumented. This study aimed to evaluate DP-CAR volume and mortality, preoperative arterial embolization for ischaemic gastropathy, the oncological benefit for resectable tumours close to the bifurcation of the splenic artery and coeliac artery using propensity score matching, and prognostic factors in DP-CAR. In a multi-institutional analysis, 626 DP-CARs were analysed retrospectively and compared with 1325 distal pancreatectomies undertaken in the same interval. Ninety-day mortality was observed in 7 of 21 high-volume centres (1 or more DP-CARs per year) and 1 of 41 low-volume centres (OR 20.00, 95 per cent c.i. 2.26 to 177.26). The incidence of ischaemic gastropathy was 19.2 per cent in the embolization group and 7.9 per cent in the no-embolization group (OR 2.77, 1.48 to 5.19). Propensity score matching analysis showed that median overall survival was 33.5 (95 per cent c.i. 27.4 to 42.0) months in the DP-CAR and 37.9 (32.8 to 53.3) months in the DP group. Multivariable analysis identified age at least 67 years (HR 1.40, 95 per cent c.i. 1.12 to 1.75), preoperative tumour size 30 mm or more (HR 1.42, 1.12 to 1.80), and preoperative carbohydrate antigen 19-9 level over 37 units/ml (HR 1.43, 1.11 to 1.83) as adverse prognostic factors. DP-CAR can be performed safely in centres for general pancreatic surgery regardless of DP-CAR volume, and preoperative embolization may not be required. This procedure has no oncological advantage for resectable tumour close to the bifurcation of the splenic artery, and should be performed after appropriate patient selection.

Comparison of survival outcomes between radical antegrade modular pancreato-splenectomy (RAMPS) and conventional distal pancreato-splenectomy for pancreatic body and tail cancer

Comparison of survival outcomes between radical antegrade modular pancreato-splenectomy (RAMPS) and conventional distal pancreato-splenectomy for pancreatic body and tail cancer