Pancreas Survival Rates Research Articles

Clinical effect analysis of 146 cases of ipsilateral simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation

Objective: To investigate the clinical effect of ipsilateral simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation (SPK). Methods: A total of 146 cases of SPK surgeries completed in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University from September 2016 to June 2020 were selected to summarize the outcome, curative effect and complications of the operation. Results: The patients were followed up for 1 to 45 months. Good clinical results were obtained in 146 patients. Renal function indicators suggest that on the 7th day after operation, the serum creatinine returned to normal level [142.4 (108.6, 213.4)μmol/L]. The index of pancreatic function decreased to the normal level as expected. The level of blood amylase was 160.5(109.3, 249.8) U/L within 7 days after operation, and then decreased. The trend of urinary amylase was similar to that of blood amylase, which was 240(121.0, 370.0) U/L 7 days after operation, and glycosylated hemoglobin decreased to the normal level (5.8%±1.4%) 1 month after operation. The main medical complications were infection including pulmonary infection (26.03%, 38/146), urinary tract infection (26.03%,38/146), and abdominal infection (4.79%,7/146), acute rejection including renal graft rejection (5.8%,8/146), pancreas/duodenum rejection (18.49%,27/146), and renal graft combined pancreatic graft rejeciton (6.85%,10/146), as well as gastrointestinal bleeding (30.82%,45/146), of which 5 cases were severe bleeding (3.42%, 5/146). The main surgical complications were poor incision healing (10.27%, 15/146), serious surgical complications including arteriovenous thrombosis of the transplanted pancreas (2.05%, 3/146) and intestinal leakage (0.68%,1/146). The 1-year and 3-year patient, renal and pancreatic survival rates were both 92.5%, 91.5% and 89.5%, respectively, and despite the death, the 1-year, 3-year transplanted kidney survival rate was both 99.3%, and 95% for the the 1-year, 3-year pancreas survival rate. Conclusion: Strict preoperative evaluation of the function of large organs, reasonable surgical methods, perioperative anticoagulation, and prompt diagnosis of complications can achieve good clinical results for patients with SPK.

A novel hotspot and rare somatic mutation p.A138V, at TP53 is associated with poor survival of pancreatic ductal and periampullary adenocarcinoma patients

BackgroundPancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a cancer of the exocrine pancreas and 5-year survival rates remain constant at 7%. Along with PDAC, Periampullary Adenocarcinoma (PAC) accounts for 0.5–2% of all gastrointestinal malignancies. Genomic observations were well concluded for PDAC and PACs in western countries but no reports are available from India till now.MethodsTargeted Next Generation Sequencing were performed in 8 (5 PDAC and 3 PAC) tumour normal pairs, using a panel of 412 cancer related genes. Primary findings were replicated in 85 tumour samples (31 PDAC and 54 PAC) using the Sanger sequencing. Mutations were also validated by ASPCR, RFLP, and Ion Torrent sequencing. IHC along with molecular dynamics and docking studies were performed for the p.A138V mutant of TP53. Key polymorphisms at TP53 and its associated genes were genotyped by PCR-RFLP method and association with somatic mutations were evaluated. All survival analysis was done using the Kaplan-Meier survival method which revealed that the survival rates varied significantly depending on the somatic mutations the patients harboured.ResultsAmong the total 114 detected somatic mutations, TP53 was the most frequently mutated (41%) gene, followed by KRAS, SMAD4, CTNNB1, and ERBB3. We identified a novel hotspot TP53 mutation (p.A138V, in 17% of all patients). Low frequency of KRAS mutation (33%) was detected in these samples compared to patients from Western counties. Molecular Dynamics (MD) simulation and DNA-protein docking analysis predicted p.A138V to have oncogenic characteristics. Patients with p.A138V mutation showed poorer overall survival (p = 0.01). So, our finding highlights elevated prevalence of the p53p.A138V somatic mutation in PDAC and pancreatobiliary PAC patients.ConclusionDetection of p.A138V somatic variant in TP53 might serve as a prognostic marker to classify patients. It might also have a role in determining treatment regimes. In addition, low frequency of KRAS hotspot mutation mostly in Indian PDAC patient cohort indicates presence of other early drivers in malignant transformation.

Pancreas-After-Kidney Versus Synchronous Pancreas-Kidney Transplantation

Controversy persists over the safety and efficacy of pancreas transplantation in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus who have received a prior kidney transplant. We compared the outcomes of recipients who received either Synchronous-Pancreas Kidney-Transplantation (SPK, n=123) or Pancreas-After-Kidney-Transplants(n=49)at our institution between August 2002 to January 2010. Donor and recipient demographics were similar. Time interval between kidney and pancreas transplantation was 5.9 ± 3.8 (4.8 [1.6-12.2]) years. The majority of kidney-recipients in PAK group were transplanted at outside institutions and referred to us for PAK. Most patients received thymoglobulin induction and were maintained on tacrolimus, MMF, and prednisone. For SPK versus PAK recipients, there was no difference in median of length of hospital stay or incidence of overall complications. All PAK recipients are alive with functioning kidney grafts, whereas the 1-, 3-, and 5-year SPK patient survival rates were 98%,96%,and 94%, P=0.09. The 1-,3-, and 5-yr uncensored pancreas survival rates for SPK versus PAK were 93% vs. 90%, 90% vs. 90%, and 82% versus 85%, respectively (P=0.4). Glycemic control and intermediate survival outcomes were similar in both groups. Pancreas-graft outcomes in SPK and PAK were equivalent in our study, but our specific population entailed among other factors a long K to PAK time interval; PAK could be a comparable option to SPK for patients with access to kidney grafts.

Pancreas survival in simultaneous pancreas-kidney and pancreas-after-kidney transplantations: A five-year follow-up report

Pancreas transplantation methods, such as simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplantation and pancreas-after-kidney (PAK) transplantation, have become the most important treatments for patients with type-1 diabetes mellitus (DM)-related end-stage renal diseases (ESRD). The purpose of the study was to compare the clinical results of the pancreas graft in patients after SPK and PAK transplantations and to present the findings of our 5-year follow-up. A total of 55 patients who had kidney and pancreas transplantation between February 2003 and December 2010 were included in the study. The patients were divided into 2 groups based on the timing of the pancreas transplantation: SPK (n=21) and PAK (n=34). The patients in the SPK group consisted of 13 males and 8 females, with a mean age of 33.6±6.8 years; whereas 25 males and 9 females formed the PAK group, with a mean age of 32.0±6.0 years. In the early postoperative period, the SPK group had 3 patients with vascular thrombosis (2 venous, 1 arterial) and the PAK group had 7 patients with thrombosis (4 venous, 3 arterial) (p=0.319). At the end of the 5-year follow-up, the patient, kidney and pancreas survival rates in the SPK group were 95.2%, 95.2%, and 61.9% respectively, and the corresponding values in the PAK group were 97%, 91.2%, 61.8% (p=0.382, p=0.504, p=0.927). We concluded that PAK is just as effective as SPK to prevent the destructive effects of DM when the waiting time for SPK is long and a potential live donor is present.

Ten Years of Simultaneous Pancreas-Kidney Transplantation: A Retrospective Single-Center Analysis of Prospectively Obtained Data

Introduction Simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPK) is a standardized and life-saving procedure for a patient suffering from both insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus type 1 (IDDM 1) and end-stage diabetic nephropathy. To expand the donor pool and to determine the influence of the preprocurement pancreas suitability scoring system (P-PASS) on pancreas graft survival we retrospectively analyzed our data on SPK. Patients and Methods From 1999 to 2010 we performed 55 SPKs, using systemic-enteric drainage as surgical approach. The immunosuppressive therapy was induced with basiliximab; maintenance therapy was based on tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids. Data were prospectively obtained, analyzed, and correlated to the P-PASS. Results The overall 10-year patient survival rate was 78% with a 10-year pancreas survival rate of 53%. Three patients needed retransplantation of SPK and 6 patients needed singular pancreas retransplantation. Seventeen patients showed acute rejection episodes and 14 patients suffered from cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections. We compared 43 patients receiving organs from an “ideal” donor (P-PASS <17) with 12 patients receiving grafts from “marginal” donors (P-PASS ≥17). Neither P-PASS nor donor age demonstrated significant influence on pancreas graft survival. However, the body mass index (BMI) of the donor showed a negative tendency ( P = .059). Conclusion The P-PASS showed no significant prediction of pancreas graft survival. In view of our data, expansion of the German donor pool is possible. A multicenter study of SPK using “marginal” pancreas grafts is mandatory to define a realistic “cut-off” value for P-PASS.

Long-Term Survival of Simultaneous Pancreas-Kidney Transplantation: Influence of Early Posttransplantation Complications

BackgroundComplications that develop in the early posttransplantation period after simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPKT) can contribute to poor long-term survival of grafts and patients. Patients and MethodsWe studied 86 SPKTs that were performed between 2000 and 2010 in our hospital, analyzing all complications in the early posttransplantation period and their impact on long-term survival in patients and grafts. ResultsThe mean age of the patients was 38.77 ± 7.13 years (79.1% male). Of the 86 SPKT patients, 22.1% were on peritoneal dialysis (PD) before transplantation, 68.6% were on hemodialysis (HD), and 9.3% had not received any substitutive renal therapy. The immunosuppressive regimens consisted of induction with basiliximab followed by tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroid therapy. More than 75% of patients experienced an infection in the early posttransplantation period: bacteremia (37.2%), central catheter infection (7%), wound infection (4.7%), urinary tract (14%) and positive abdominal drain culture (45.3%). Approximately one third (31.4%) of patients underwent a reoperation, primarily due to bleeding (21.95%) or infection (19.51%). One fifth of patients (19.8%) experienced an acute rejection episode. The 3-year survival of the pancreas was lower among PD patients (82%) compared with patients who did not undergo dialysis before SPKT (100%). The 5-year survival rate of both grafts was lower among patients who underwent a reoperation than those who did not: pancreas survival rates, were 70% versus 93%, respectively (P = .015) and kidney graft survival rates were 75% versus 96%, respectively (P = .0017). Five-year patient survival rates were also lower among reoperated patients than those who were not (85% vs 97%, respectively), although the difference was not significant (P = .27). ConclusionsComplications in the early posttransplantation period after SPKT were frequent, increasing morbidity and inpatient stay. One third of our patients underwent a reoperation, which had a negative impact on graft survival.

Impact of pancreatic venous drainage site on long‐term patient and graft outcome in simultaneous pancreas‐kidney transplantation

The impact of portal or systemic venous pancreas graft drainage on patient and graft outcome remains controversial. In the present study, the impact of venous drainage type on long-term patient and graft survival is assessed. From July 1996 to December 2002 80 simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplants were enrolled into a prospective study: 44 received a pancreas allograft with portal (P-SPK group) and 36 with systemic venous drainage (S-SPK group). Enteric exocrine drainage was performed in all recipients receiving the same immunosuppressive treatment. At one yr, the patient survival rates were 91.7% and 95.5% both for S-SPK and P-SPK groups, respectively; no significant difference in survival was shown at any time point of the follow-up. The one-, three-, five-, and eight-yr pancreas survival rates were 75%, 60.6%, 56.7%, and 44%, respectively in the S-SPK group compared to 88.6%, 84.1%, 78.4%, and 31.3% in the P-SPK group. The one-, three-, five-, and eight-yr kidney survival rates were 91.7%, 78.15%, 74.1%, and 57.9%, respectively in the S-SPK group compared to 93.2%, 88.6%, 78.4%, and 38.9% in the P-SPK group. Comparing the two groups, no significant difference was shown in the total number of surgical complications as well as in the number of each complication. No significant difference in long-term outcomes between the two groups was shown, even if in S-SPK group a higher incidence of pancreas graft loss has been reported and it was in part correlated to a higher number of graft thromboses.

Simultaneous Pancreas-Kidney Transplantation: Five-Year Results From a Single Center

We report the 5-year results of our simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPKT) program, started on May 2, 2000. Forty-two SPKT were performed on 42 type I diabetic patients with chronic renal failure. The procedure was performed with enteric diversion and vascular anastomosis to the iliac vessels. Immunosuppressive protocol included antithymocyte globulin, tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids. The 24 women and 18 men had a mean age of 33.5 ± 6.3 years and mean 22.8 ± 14.2 years time of diabetes evolution. Forty patients had been on dialysis for 34.3 ± 24.1 months, and two were preemptive transplantations. Acute rejection episodes were treated in eight patients (19.1%): in three cases they affected both organs; in two only the kidney was affected; and the other three were pancreas graft rejections. The incidence of postoperative complications requiring re-operation was 42.9%, mostly pancreas graft related. Two patients died, one due to cardiovascular disease; the other was transplant related. Three kidney grafts were lost, and the causes were immunologic, thrombosis, and patient death. Pancreas graft loss occurred in seven patients: thrombosis ( n = 3); infection ( n = 3); immunologic ( n = 1). The patients with surviving grafts were doing well, with normal kidney and pancreas function: serum creatinine = 0.89 ± 0.15 mg/dL; fasting blood glucose = 79 ± 16 mg/dL; HbA1c = 4.7 ± 1.1%. The 1-year patient, kidney, and pancreas survival rates were 97.3%, 94.6%, and 83.8% and 5-year values, 91.7%, 89.2%, and 78.7%, respectively. In conclusion, these results are similar to the most recent UNOS/IPTR reports, leading us to consider our experience with SPKT very positive.

Pancreas transplantation: advantages of both enteric and bladder drainage combined in a two‐step approach

Although there is a tendency to perform enteric drainage of pancreas transplants in simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplantation, bladder drainage is still preferable in pancreas transplantation alone (PTA) or after a previous kidney transplantation (PAK). Our hypothesis was that enteric conversion of a bladder drained pancreas is an effective and safe procedure. We studied the complication rate and physiological effects of enteric conversion in patients with primary bladder-drained SPK transplantation. We performed 51 enteric conversions in bladder-drained SPK transplant recipients. As we observed a low complication rate, with time enteric conversions were also performed for less strict and severe indications. The main indications for conversion were urological problems, metabolic complications and reflux-pancreatitis. The median transplantation-conversion interval was 12 months (range 2-40 months). Post-operative complications consisted of seven urinary tract infections, two low-grade superficial wound infections, one minor bleeding, one phlebitis and one paralytic ileus. In two patients, a relaparotomy was necessary. No graft rejection following enteric conversion was found. Long-term renal and pancreatic function were not affected by the enteric conversion. Three-year patient, kidney and pancreas survival rates after enteric conversion were 93, 97 and 93%, respectively (censored data). Enteric conversion after pancreas transplantation is an effective and safe procedure. Therefore, we suggest a policy of a two-step approach of primary bladder drainage followed by an enteric conversion of the pancreas in a selected group of SPK patients.

Pancreas transplant outcomes for United States (US) and non‐US cases as reported to the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) and the International Pancreas Transplant Registry (IPTR) as of June 2004

As of December 31, 2004, more than 23,000 pancreas transplant had been reported to the IPTR, >17,000 in the US and almost 6000 from outside the US. An analysis of US pancreas transplants performed between 1988 and 2003 showed a progressive improvement in outcome, with pancreas transplant graft survival rates (GSRs) going from 75% at 1 yr for 1988/1989 to 85% for 2002/2003 simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) cases, from 55 to 78% for pancreas after kidney (PAK) cases, and from 45 to 77% for pancreas transplants alone (PTA) cases. The improvements were due both to decreases in technical failure (TF) rates (from 12 to 6% in SPK, 13-8% in PAK, and 24-7% in PTA) and immunological failure rates (going from 7 to 2% for SPK, from 28 to 7% for PAK, and from 38 to 8% for PTA cases). These results are even more impressive under the aspect that during the same time the rate of potential risk factors increased and the duct management techniques changed from bladder to enteric drainage. The improvement in outcome allowed also an increase in the number of solitary pancreas transplants from initially 12% to now 35%. Contemporary primary deceased donor pancreas transplant outcomes were calculated separately for 2000-2004 US and non-US cases. The US patient survival rates at 1 yr were >95% in each recipient category, with 1 yr primary pancreas GSRs of 85% for SPK, 78% for PAK, and 76% for PTA (p < 0.0001). The immunological graft failure rates for 2000-2004 technically successful (TS) SPK, PAK, and PTA cases were 2, 8, and 10% at 1 yr (p = 0.0001). In the majority of all transplants ED was used for duct management (81% of SPK, 67% of PAK, and 56% for PTA cases). Of the ED transplants, venous drainage via the portal system was used for 20% of SPK, 23% of PAK, and 35% of PTA cases. Duct management technique did not have a significant impact on overall pancreas graft function in the univariate or the multivariate model. The outcomes of ED and BD transplants are comparable with 85 vs. 87% at 1 yr for SPK, 77 vs. 80% for PAK, and 72 vs. 79% for PTA. The overall TF rate was higher in ED pancreas transplants but this difference did reach significance only in SPK. In addition, in technically successful PTA the immunological graft loss rate was higher in ED vs. BD transplants (15 vs. 5% at 1 yr). The different vascular management techniques did not seem to have an impact on the outcome of the pancreas transplants. Kidney GSRs were not significantly different for ED vs. BD SPK cases, 93 and 91% at 1 yr (p = 0.24). The overall conversion rate from BD to ED was 9% at 1 yr and 17% at 3 yr post-transplant. The most influential factor for patient survival in SPK and PAK in the multivariate and the univariate models was the status of the transplanted organ. The hazard ratio (HR) for a failed kidney was 14.99 in SPK and 9.17 in PAK (p = 0.0001). The HR for a failed pancreas graft was 3.51 in SPK and 4.17 for PAK (p = 0.0001). In PTA a failed pancreas graft did not have a direct impact on patient survival. SPK and PAK patients older than 44 yr at the time of transplants also showed an increased mortality risk, but at the same time the risk of immunological graft loss was significantly decreased for those patients. TAC&MMF remained the dominant maintenance immunosuppressant for 2000-2004 US cases (approximately two-third) in all three categories and with this regime 1-year GSRs were > or =80% in all three recipient categories. The results were comparable (> or =83% 1-year GSR) for patients (approximately 10%) treated with Sirolimus (SIR) under various protocols. In regard to non-US pancreas transplants, even for 2000-2004 the overwhelming majority continued to be in the SPK category (91%), with 1-year patient, kidney and pancreas survival rates of 94, 92, and 87%. Solitary transplants are still very rarely done outside the US. Non-US PAK GSR at 1 yr was 85%, non-US PTA GSR at 1 yr was 76%. In summary, with the new advancements in immunosuppression and changes in surgical techniques the outcomes in patient survival and pancreas transplant graft function continue to improve even with an increasing proportion of high risk patients in all three categories.

Surgical Complications are the Main Cause of Pancreatic Allograft Loss in Pancreas-Kidney Transplant Recipients

We examined surgical complications among a group of diabetic type 1 patients (IDDM) with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) who had undergone pancreas-kidney transplantations (PK). Between October 1993 and August 2004, 70 SPK were performed using bladder (n = 14) or enteric (n = 56) drainage. Donors were selected according to standard criteria (mean age, 27.6 years; range, 17–49). All patients received cyclosporine-based immunosuppression. All pancreata functioned immediately, whereas 2 patients needed postoperative dialysis. Four patients (5.7%) lost their pancreatic graft due to vascular thrombosis; both patients underwent urgent allograft pancreaectomy and pancreas retransplantation (re-PT). One of them (1.4%) experienced a venous thrombosis and died due to a pulmonary embolism at 12 hours after re-PT. The other 3 patients had uneventful postoperative courses and were discharged with good pancreatic and renal function. Three patients in the bladder group (21.4%) had an anastomotic leak, which resolved with a bladder catheter. Four patients in the enteric group (7.1%) who experienced an anastomotic leak needed a second surgical procedure but in 3 of them allograft pancreatectomy was necessary. Relaparotomy was required in the other 3 patients due to hemorrhage (1 patient) or occlusion (2 patients). Acute rejection episodes, which occurred in 16 patients (22.8%), were treated with steroid boluses. With a mean follow-up of 72 months (range, 3–129), 2 patients have died at 8 and at 36 months, respectively, after SPK due to acute myocardial infarction (2.9%). Chronic rejection was the leading cause of pancreatic failure in 5 patients (7.1%) and of renal failure in 2 patients (2.8%). Patient, kidney, and pancreas survival rates were 95.8%, 92.9%, and 81.5%, respectively. Surgical complications were the leading cause of pancreatic allograft loss in IDDM and ESRD patients submitted to SPK.

Outcome of 118 Pancreas Transplants With Retroperitoneal Portal-Enteric Drainage

Background We have recently described a technique for retroperitoneal pancreas transplantation (RPTx) with portal-enteric drainage (PED). Further experience with 118 RPTx is detailed herein. Methods Between April 2001 and August 2004, 118 patients underwent RPTx with PED among 125 recipients (94.4%) scheduled for this procedure. Surgical complications and patient and graft survivals were recorded prospectively. Results After a minimum follow-up period of 3 months (mean 27.8 ± 13.0 months), 18 recipients (15.2%) required relaparotomy because of bleeding ( n = 6; 5.1%), allograft pancreatectomy due to either hyperacute/accelerated rejection ( n = 3; 2.5%) or vein thrombosis ( n = 3; 2.5%), leak from duodenojejunal anastomosis ( n = 2; 1.7%), bleeding and vein thrombectomy ( n = 1; 0.8%), or small bowel occlusion due to bezoar ( n = 1; 0.8%). One patient had a negative relaparotomy and one underwent two relaparotomies. Most patients with hemorrhage (5/7; 71.4%) were recipients of solitary pancreas grafts managed with heparin infusion. No venous thrombi extended into recipient’s superior mesenteric vein. Nonocclusive venous thrombosis was diagnosed with duplex ultrasonography and confirmed at computed tomography in seven patients (5.1%). None of these patients lost graft function. Ten patients (8.5%) were diagnosed with peripancreatic fluid collections, all successfully treated by observation ( n = 7) or percutaneous drainage ( n = 3). Enteric bleeding occurred in eight recipients (6.8%). Overall, 1-year patient and pancreas survival rates were 97.4% and 92.0%, respectively. Conclusions We conclude that RPTx with PED is a technical option that may be included in the repertoire of pancreas transplant surgeons.

Cytomegalovirus Infection in Simultaneous Pancreas-Kidney Transplantation

Introduction In this open-label multicenter study, 205 simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplant recipients between 1998 and 2000 were randomly assigned to tacrolimus or cyclosporine-microemulsion (ME). All patients received concomitant rATG induction therapy, mycophenolate mofetil and short-term corticosteroids. We report the 3-year data related to the occurrence, severity and effect of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections. The type of CMV prophylaxis and treatment was at the discretion of the investigator. Results The overall incidence of CMV infection was 34% with no difference in incidence between the tacrolimus and cyclosporine-ME treatment arms. Statistically significant fewer CMV infections occurred among patients who received ganciclovir (22%) than those who did not receive prophylaxis (42%; P = .0075) or were treated with acyclovir (43%; P = .0066). The CMV infection rate according to donor recipient CMV serological status was: D−/R− group 11%, which was lower than the D−/R+ group at 40% ( P = .0035), the D+/R+ group at 37% ( P = .0024), or the D+/R− group at 52% ( P = .00001). Among the last three groups, the infection rate was lower in patients on ganciclovir than those with no prophylaxis or on acyclovir (22% vs 64%; P = .00001). The incidence of acute rejection episodes was higher among patients without ganciclovir prophylaxis. No difference was observed in actuarial patient, kidney, or pancreas survival rates between patients with versus without infection. Conclusions Ganciclovir prophylaxis effectively prevented CMV infection in SPK transplant recipients, especially in higher risk groups. An effect of CMV prophylaxis on the incidence of rejection is possible.

50 consecutive pancreas transplants with enteric drainage and extraperitoneal placement of the pancreatic graft

BACKGROUND: The surgical technique and tactics of pancreas transplantation are issues not fully resolved as yet. The beginnings of pancreas transplant program at our center date 20 years back, the history of the program being characterized by seeking and looking for the best surgical techniques. METHODS: In line with global trends, we have employed the enteric drainage technique with the last fifty pancreas transplants. The pancreatic graft was placed outside the peritoneal cavity. RESULTS: One-year actual patient and pancreas survival rates in this set of transplants were 96 percent and 88 percent, respectively. Apart from the healing of the wound, surgical complications were seldom encountered. The most frequent complication in our group of patients was bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: The current standard is to transplant whole pancreas with the duodenal segment and enteric drainage. The extraperitoneal placement of the pancreatic graft facilitates access during mandatory biopsies of the graft, which is an essential advantage especially for isolated pancreas transplants.

Experience with steroid-free maintenance immunosuppression in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation

Introduction Steroid avoidance is possible in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation with the use of newer immunosuppressive agents and induction therapy. We undertook a retrospective consecutive case review of patients treated at a university tertiary referral center. Methods Medical records of 44 consecutive patients receiving a pancreas-kidney transplant from November 2000 to September 2002 were reviewed. The immunosuppression protocol used in this series of patients consisted of thymoglobulin induction, combined with mycophenolate mofetil, tacrolimus, and sirolimus for maintenance immunosuppression. Steroids were used only while thymoglobulin was given and were typically discontinued by postoperative week 1. Main outcome measures included graft and patient survival rates, rejection rates of the kidney or pancreas, infection rates, and surgical complication rates. Results All 44 patients received a kidney-pancreas transplant with systemic venous anastomosis and enteric drainage of the pancreas. Patient kidney, and pancreas survival rates were 95.6%, 93.2%, and 88.7%, respectively. Biopsy-proven pancreas rejection rates at 1 and 6 months posttransplant were 2.3% and 2.3%. Kidney rejection rates at 1 and 6 months were 2.3% and 4.6%. Reasons for patient loss included one death from sepsis and one cardiovascular death. Reasons for kidney loss besides death included a thrombotic microangiopathy. Reasons for pancreas loss included three thromboses, one mild rejection/infection, and one duodenal segment leak with infection. All patients who have been free of rejection have been off steroids for the duration of follow-up. Conclusions Newer immunosuppression protocols without maintenance steroids are possible with minimal rejection in the first 3 months and equivalent patient and graft survival rates compared with earlier protocols utilizing steroids. The potential beneficial long-term impact of steroid avoidance will require further study.

Immunosuppression in pancreas transplantation: mycophenolate mofetil versus sirolimus

The use of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in pancreas transplantation has increased graft survival and decreased the incidence of acute rejections episodes (ARE), regardless of the choice of calcineurin inhibitor. The combination of MMF with tacrolimus (TAC) is the most common protocol, it is considered the gold standard for new protocols. In the last few years, there have been reports of a small number of patients treated with sirolimus (RAPA), usually combined with TAC. Patient and pancreas survival rates as well as the incidence of ARE were similar to protocols with TAC and MMF. Twenty simultaneous pancreas and kidney (SPK) transplantations were performed using an immunosuppressive protocol of TAC, RAPA, and steroids (STE) after 2000. The incidence of ARE was 25%; all episodes responded to STE. Only 2 patients (10%) displayed hypercholesterolemia requiring treatment with statins. The use of RAPA as an alternative to MMF is promising, although presently one with limited experience. The combination of MMF and RAPA with or without a calcineurin inhibitor is an option to be evaluated in the future.

Excellent short-term results with steroid-free maintenance immunosuppression in low-risk simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation.

Steroid avoidance is possible in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation with the use of newer immunosuppressive agents and induction therapy. A retrospective consecutive case review. A university tertiary referral center. Medical records of 40 consecutive patients who underwent pancreas-kidney transplantation from November 2000 to July 2002 were reviewed. The immunosuppression protocol used in this series of patients consisted of Thymoglobulin induction combined with mycophenolate mofetil, tacrolimus, and sirolimus for maintenance immunosuppression. Steroids were used as pretreatment only, given with Thymoglobulin, and were typically discontinued by postoperative week 1. Graft and patient survival rates, rejection rates of the kidney or pancreas, infection rates, and surgical complication rates. Patient, kidney, and pancreas survival rates were 95.0%, 92.5%, and 87.5%, respectively. Biopsy-proven pancreas rejection rates at 1 and 3 months' posttransplantation were 2.5%. Kidney rejection rates at 1 and 3 months were 2.5%. Steroids were given only to patients with documented transplant rejection. Surgical and medical complications were no different from earlier protocols. Immunosuppression protocols that do not include maintenance steroids have shown minimal rejection in the first 3 months and equivalent patient and graft survival rates compared with protocols that use steroids. The potential beneficial long-term impact of steroid avoidance will require further study.

Technical and immunologic progress in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation

Background. During the past few years the use of new immunosuppressants and refinements in surgical technique of simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplantation have resulted in markedly improved outcomes. This is a retrospective study of 208 SPK transplants performed at Northwestern University, demonstrating the advances made at a single center that are reflective of the field at large. Methods. An 8.5-year time span was split into 4 distinct eras marking sequential changes in immunosuppression and surgical technique that ensued. SPK transplant outcomes of patient and graft survival and rejection rates were compared. Also examined were end points related to the changing risk profile of the recipients, as well as quality of allograft function and rates of rehospitalizations. Results. Recipients receiving tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil-based immunosuppression had patient, kidney, and pancreas survival rates significantly higher than those of earlier cohorts. The elimination of corticosteroids did not reduce survival rates or increase rejection risk. The use of pancreatic exocrine enteric drainage technique over bladder drainage reduced rehospitalizations. Conclusions. Advances in immunosuppression management combined with technical refinements have made SPK transplantation a safer and more effective treatment option for the diabetic, uremic patient. (Surgery 2002;132:545-54.)

A prospective study of rapid corticosteroid elimination in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation: comparison of two maintenance immunosuppression protocols: tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil versus tacrolimus/sirolimus.

We examined the feasibility of rapid corticosteroid elimination in simultaneous pancreas kidney transplantation. Forty consecutive simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplant recipients were enrolled in a prospective study in which antithymocyte globulin induction and 6 days of corticosteroids were administered along with tacrolimus and MMF (n=20) or tacrolimus and sirolimus (n=20). Mean+/-SD follow-up for recipients receiving tacrolimus/MMF and tacrolimus/sirolimus were 12.7+/-3.9 and 13.4+/-2.9 months, respectively. Patient and graft survival, and rejection rates were compared to an historical control group (n=86; mean follow-up 41.5+/-15.4 months) of SPK recipients that received induction and tacrolimus, MMF, and corticosteroids. Demographic characteristics of recipient and donor variables were similar among all groups. The 1-year actuarial patient, kidney, and pancreas survival rates in the 40 SPK transplant recipients with rapid corticosteroid elimination were 100, 100, and 100%, respectively. In the historical control group the 1-year actual patient, kidney, and pancreas survival rates were 96.5, 93.0, and 91.9%, respectively. The 1-year rejection-free survival rate recipients in the rapid steroid elimination group collectively was 97.5 vs 80.2% in the historical control group (P=0.034). At 6 and 12 months posttransplant the serum creatinine values remained stable in all groups. We conclude that chronic corticosteroid exposure is not required in SPK transplant recipients receiving antithymocyte globulin induction and maintenance immuno-suppression consisting of either tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil or tacrolimus and sirolimus.

Simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation in the mycophenolate mofetil/tacrolimus era: Evolution from induction therapy with bladder drainage to noninduction therapy with enteric drainage

Background. In the past, enteric drainage or the omission of induction immunotherapy has been shown to be predictive of suboptimal outcomes of simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplantation. We have reassessed the need for bladder drainage and induction immunotherapy to optimize the outcome of SPK transplantation. Methods. One hundred consecutive recipients of SPK transplants who received mycophenolate mofetil and tacrolimus immunosuppression were studied. The first 50 recipients had bladder-drained pancreas allografts and received induction immunotherapy. The results were compared with the next 50 recipients who had enteric-drained pancreas allografts, which included a subgroup (n = 17 patients) who were randomized to receive no induction immunotherapy. Results. The 1-year actuarial patient, kidney, and pancreas survival rates in the bladder-drainage group were 98.0%, 94.0%, and 94.0%, respectively. The 1-year actuarial patient, kidney, and pancreas survival rates in the enteric-drainage group were 96.8%, 96.8%, and 89.4%, respectively. In the enteric-drainage group, the incidence of rejection at 1 year was 6.1% in recipients who received induction therapy versus 23.5% in recipients who did not receive induction therapy. The average number of readmissions per recipient was 1.8 in the bladder-drainage group versus 0.9 in the enteric-drainage group. Conclusions. Primary enteric drainage of the pancreas allograft in recipients of SPK transplantation is the preferred surgical technique in the tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil era. (Surgery 2000;128:726-37.)