pan-TRK Immunohistochemistry Research Articles

Nuclear staining for pan-Trk by immunohistochemistry is highly specific for secretory carcinoma of breast: pan-Trk in various subtypes of breast carcinoma

AimsSecretory carcinoma of breast (SCB) typically harbours ETV6-NTRK3 gene fusion. Pan-Trk immunohistochemistry analysis (IHC) has been shown to be sensitive for SCB diagnosis. However, weak focal pan-Trk nuclear staining was...

Cytologic testing for mismatch repair deficiency/microsatellite instability and NTRK gene fusion is not routinely indicated in primary pancreaticobiliary carcinoma cell block material

Pancreaticobiliary carcinomas rarely harbor targetable genetic alterations, including microsatellite instability (MSI) or neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK) gene fusions. As these malignancies are typically present at an advanced stage and have suboptimal response to chemotherapy, the discovery of an actionable genomic alteration provides an additional avenue of treatment for chemotherapy-refractory cases. In this study, we evaluate 319 cases of pancreaticobiliary carcinoma diagnosed on fine-needle aspiration biopsy or biliary brushing for DNA mismatch repair (MMR) protein deficiency and pan-TRK overexpression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and compare these results to MSI and NTRK gene fusion molecular testing. Although we find a high concordance between MMR protein IHC and MSI molecular testing in the evaluation of MMR deficiency and between pan-TRK IHC and NTRK fusion testing by next-generation sequencing, the low prevalence of either of these genetic alterations in our cohort casts doubt on the value of screening cases of pancreaticobiliary carcinoma for MMR protein deficiency and NTRK fusions.

Neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase gene fusions in adult and pediatric patients with solid tumors: a clinicogenomic biobank and record linkage study of expression frequency and patient characteristics from Finland.

Neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK) gene fusions are oncogenic drivers. Using the Auria Biobank in Finland, we aimed to identify and characterize patients with these gene fusions, and describe their clinical and tumor characteristics, treatments received, and outcomes. We evaluated pediatrics with any solid tumor type and adults with colorectal cancer (CRC), non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), sarcoma, or salivary gland cancer. We determined tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) protein expression by pan-TRK immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining of tumor samples from the Auria Biobank, scored by a certified pathologist. NTRK gene fusion was confirmed by next generation sequencing (NGS). All 2,059 patients were followed-up starting 1 year before their cancer diagnosis. Frequency of NTRK gene fusion tumors was 3.1% (4/127) in pediatrics, 0.7% (8/1,151) for CRC, 0.3% (1/288) for NSCLC, 0.9% (1/114) for salivary gland cancer, and 0% (0/379) for sarcoma. Among pediatrics there was one case each of fibrosarcoma (TPM3::NTRK1), Ewing's sarcoma (LPPR1::NTRK2), primitive neuroectodermal tumor (DAB2IP::NTRK2), and papillary thyroid carcinoma (RAD51B::NTRK3). Among CRC patients, six harbored tumors with NTRK1 fusions (three fused with TPM3), one harbored a NTRK3::GABRG1 fusion, and the other a NTRK2::FXN/LPPR1 fusion. Microsatellite instability was higher in CRC patients with NTRK gene fusion tumors versus wild-type tumors (50.0% vs. 4.4%). Other detected fusions were SGCZ::NTRK3 (NSCLC) and ETV6::NTRK3 (salivary gland cancer). Four patients (three CRC, one NSCLC) received chemotherapy; one patient (with CRC) received radiotherapy. NTRK gene fusions are rare in adult CRC, NSCLC, salivary tumors, sarcoma, and pediatric solid tumors.

LMIC-02. FREQUENCY OF NTRK FUSIONS IN PEDIATRIC LOW GRADE GLIOMAS. DATA FROM A SINGLE CENTER IN MONTERREY, MEXICO

Abstract BACKGROUND Neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinases (NTRK 1-3)fusions have been identified in a range of pediatric cancer. Among children with cancer NTRK fusions can be detected in less than 1% of cases. Low grade gliomas (LGG) are the most pediatric brain tumors and the frequency of NTRK fusions reported is between 0.4 -4.3%. NTRK2 fusions are the most commonly reported in pediatric brain tumors. METHOD We describe the characteristics of patients analysed. Due to limited access to Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) only patients with recurrent, progressive, metastatic or midline location LGG were tested during 2021-2022. Positivity to Pan-Trk immunohistochemistry was needed to proceed to confirmation with NGS. 10 patients with LGG were included. Median age of patients at baseline was 4.7 (range,1-12) years. 10/10 showed positivity to Pan-Trk stain and NTRK fusions were detected in 6/10 patients, 3/6 had NTRK1 fusions, 2/6 NTRK2 fusion and 1 with NTRK3 fusion.. All 4 patients without NTRK fusions are off therapy (more than 1 year survellaince) and 2/4 were treated with surgery only. All patients with NTRK fusions are still on treatment due to progressive disease, 4/6 patients have required 2 or more surgeries and 5/6 patients have needed 2 or more chemotherapy regimens. CONCLUSION This small cohort of patients represents a highly selected population with LGG and the frequency of NTRK fusions resulted significantly higher than expected (6 out of 10 patients tested). This finding could reflect a clinical or prognostic significance, it will be important to analyze a larger cohort of patients that share these same clinical characteristics to determine its real value as a prognostic marker in these heavily treated patients. There is well known molecular alterations that predict outcome in patients with LGG. NTRK targeted therapy already exists with proven efficacy although access may limits its use.

Establishing optimized staining protocol and cutoff values of pan-TRK immunohistochemistry for detecting NTRK fusions in solid tumors: A Chinese multicenter cross-sectional study.

e15160 Background: Using IHC to screen NTRK+ patients, followed by NGS confirmation, is a strategy recommended by ESMO guidelines. However, the current IHC staining protocol (Protocol) and cutoff value (CV) are suboptimal, resulting in limited screening performance. This study aims to optimize the Protocol and redefine the CV to improve the efficacy of pan-TRK IHC in screening NTRK fusions. Methods: 126 NTRK+ and 162 NTRK- solid tumor samples (spls), previously confirmed by NGS and/or FISH, were collected retrospectively from 12 hospitals across China in 2023. All spls were stained with VENTANA pan-TRK IHC assay by using two different Protocols: 1) the conventional one recommended by the manufacturer's instruction and 2) an amplification one that included additional amplification steps to enhance the staining. The IHC stained spls were interpreted based on the manufacturer's instruction, and the results were analyzed to calculate the CVs. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV, and NPV based on these CVs and the CV reported in the literature were calculated. Results: 126 NTRK+ spls involve 25 fusion-partner types and 23 tumor types. IHC showed 35 NTRK- spls without staining, and 253 spls (126NTRK+/127NTRK-) stained. The staining predominantly localized to the cytoplasm and nucleus (132 cytoplasmic positive, 105 cytoplasmic and nuclear positive). Due to the limited samples with membrane staining, only CVs for cytoplasmic and nuclear staining were defined. In order to enhance the sensitivity and feasibility of the pan-TRK IHC assay in NTRK+ screening, the statistically calculated CVs were adjusted, and we recommended using the following CVs in clinical practice: 1) ≥1 intensity of cytoplasmic staining in ≥50% of tumor cells and/or 2) ≥1 intensity of nuclear staining in any percentage of tumor cells. Compared with the statistically calculated CVs, although the accuracy of the recommended CVs was slightly reduced (87.5% vs 93.75%), the sensitivity was improved (94.44% vs 89.68%). The sensitivity and specificity of the recommended CVs were higher than that of the previously reported CV (≥1%): sensitivity (94.44% vs. 87.9%) and specificity (82.1% vs. 81.1%). Conclusions: The pan-TRK IHC assay demonstrated high sensitivity while maintaining good specificity and accuracy, improving screening and enrichment efficacy for identifying NTRK fusions in solid tumors by utilizing the amplification protocol and the recommended CVs. Clinical trial information: ChiCTR2200066850 . [Table: see text]

Effect of screening with a pan-TRK immunohistochemistry-based algorithm on NTRK fusion detection rates.

e15135 Background: Rearrangements in the NTRK1, NTRK2, and NTRK3 genes are clinical actionable and predictive of response to TRK kinase inhibitors in solid tumors. Their detection in clinical practice is a priority, but their low prevalence (0.25-1%) poses a diagnostic challenge. In this study, we describe our immunohistochemical-based and cost-effective approach for NTRK rearrangements detection. Methods: We implemented a comprehensive NTRK testing approach at a reference center that combined clinical criteria (e.g., iodine therapy-resistant thyroid cancer); molecular biomarkers (e.g., non-small-cell lung carcinoma negative for driver alterations, colorectal carcinoma with deficient MMR and/or microsatellite instability); and histopathological criteria (identifying tumor subtypes associated with NTRK fusions, such as breast secretory carcinoma). Automated immunohistochemistry (Ventana BenchMark ULTRA IHC/ISH System) using the antibody pan-TRK (Ventana, EPR17341) was used as a screening tool. Positive results were confirmed through molecular techniques, including Next Generation Sequencing, NGS (Oncomine Focus Assay, Thermo Fisher, based on DNA and RNA) and/or FISH (NTRK3 break-apart probe, Zytovision). Results: We evaluated 172 patients (99 female/73 male), with a mean age of 52 years (SD 23.8). Eighteen (18) patients with neoplasms expressing TRK proteins were identified. Confirmatory studies using NGS identified fusions in 7 cases. In instances of poor RNA quality, FISH techniques (NTRK3) were employed, confirming the findings in an additional 3 patients. Overall prevalence of NTRK fusions was 5.8%. Histological types included the following tumor types: Thyroid carcinoma, 4 patients (one medullary and 3 papillary carcinomas, two of them in the pediatric population); soft tissue sarcomas, 3 patients (2 corresponding to infantile fibrosarcoma and a soft tissue provisional entity, "NTRK-rearranged spindle cell neoplasm”); secretory carcinoma of the breast, one patient; secretory carcinoma of the salivary gland, one patient; colorectal carcinoma, one patient, with a deficient MMR phenotype. NTRK3 gene fusions were found in 10 patients, (6 fusions with ETV6 detected by NGS and 3 detected by FISH), and NTRK1 fusion in 1 case (fusion with LMNA detected by NGS). The positive predictive value of pan-TRK immunohistochemistry as a screening tool was 0.55. Conclusions: In our experience, the comprehensive screening approach based on morphological and clinical/ molecular inclusion criteria, along with the use of immunohistochemical techniques (pan-TRK antibody), significantly enhances the detection rate of NTRK fusions (5.8% vs. 0.25-1%). Additionally, FISH provides a valuable tool in samples with poor RNA quality. This approach allows for a reduction in the impact of costly testing, such as NGS, on the healthcare system.

Prevalence and detection methodology for preliminary exploration of NTRK fusion in gastric cancer from a single-center retrospective cohort

The fusion of neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK) is a novel target for cancer therapy and offers hope for patients with gastric cancer (GC). However, there are few studies on the prevalence and detection methods of NTRK fusions in GC. In this study, we used immunohistochemistry (IHC) as a screening method to select cases for molecular testing and evaluated the effectiveness of IHC, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and next-generation sequencing (NGS). We retrospectively collected 1970 patients with GC. Pan-TRK IHC was conducted in all cases, and three cases were positive: one with strong and diffuse cytoplasmic staining, while two with weak cytoplasmic staining. All three cases were validated using NTRK1/2/3 FISH. FISH results revealed a single 3′ signal of NTRK1 in 95% of the tumor cells in the first case, while the remaining two cases were negative. NGS confirmed LMNA-NTRK1 fusion in the first case, with no gene fusion detected in the other two cases. Out of 46 negative controls, one had a non-functional fusion of IGR-NTRK1, and four had point mutations. The case with LMNA-NTRK1 fusion were negative for pMMR, EBV, HER2, and AFP. The pan-TRK IHC showed a 33.33% (1/3) concordance rate with RNA-based NGS. If the criterion for positivity was 3+ cytoplasmic staining, the agreement between IHC and RNA-based NGS was 100% (1/1). In conclusion, the incidence of NTRK fusion in GC is extremely low (0.05%). If the criteria are strict, pan-TRK IHC is highly effective for screening NTRK fusions. FISH could complement NGS detection, particularly when NTRK fusion is detected by DNA sequencing. NTRK fusion in GC may not be limited to specific subtypes.

Pan-TRK immunohistochemistry as a tool in the screening for NTRK gene fusions in cancer patients

Therapy with TRK inhibitors is a tumor-agnostic treatment directed against specific molecular changes rather than cancer type. NTRK fusions are rare in most prevalent cancers, accounting for less than 0.5% of cases. However, there is a group of rare cancers in which NTRK fusion is more prevalent. These include secretory carcinoma of the breast and salivary gland, childhood sarcomas, such as infantile fibrosarcoma, and cellular and mixed congenital mesoblastic nephroblastoma. The most common rearrangement pertains to NTRK3 and the most common fusion gene is ETV6 . Identifying patients with NTRK gene fusions who would likely benefit from targeted therapy with TRK inhibitors requires practical diagnostic tools and an appropriate management strategy of diagnostic trajectory. The fusions can be detected by molecular biology techniques or pan-TRK immunohistochemistry. The latter detects NTRK1/2/3 gene fusions independently of the resulting fusion gene but does not determine which of them has been rearranged or what the fusion partner is. The sensitivity and specificity of the method reach 97% and 100%, respectively. Other advantages include the relatively low cost, short duration of examination, and broad accessibility of immunohistochemistry laboratories. These characteristics make this method a useful screening tool for detecting patients with NTRK gene fusions.

Neurotrophic-tyrosine receptor kinase gene fusion in papillary thyroid cancer: A clinicogenomic biobank and record linkage study from Finland.

Selective tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) inhibitors are approved targeted therapies for patients with solid tumors harboring a neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK) gene fusion. Country-specific estimates of NTRK gene fusion frequency, and knowledge on the characteristics of affected patients, are limited. We identified patients with histologically-confirmed papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) from Finland's Auria Biobank. TRK protein expression was determined by pan-TRK immunohistochemistry. Immuno-stained tumor samples were scored by a certified pathologist. Gene fusions and other co-occurring gene alterations were identified by next generation sequencing. Patient characteristics and vital status were determined from linked hospital electronic health records (EHRs). Patients were followed from 1 year before PTC diagnosis until death. 6/389 (1.5%) PTC patients had an NTRK gene fusion (all NTRK3); mean age 43.8 years (and none had comorbidities) at PTC diagnosis. Gene fusion partners were EML4 (n = 3), ETV6 (n = 2), and RBPMS (n = 1). Of 3/6 patients with complete EHRs, all received radioactive iodine ablation only and were alive at end of follow-up (median observation, 9.12 years). In conclusion, NTRK gene fusion is infrequent in patients with PTC. Linkage of biobank samples to EHRs is feasible in describing the characteristics and outcomes of patients with PTC and potentially other cancer types.

Evaluation of NTRK expression and fusions in a large cohort of early-stage lung cancer

Tropomyosin receptor kinases (TRK) are attractive targets for cancer therapy. As TRK-inhibitors are approved for all solid cancers with detectable fusions involving the Neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK)-genes, there has been an increased interest in optimizing testing regimes. In this project, we wanted to find the prevalence of NTRK fusions in a cohort of various histopathological types of early-stage lung cancer in Norway and to investigate the association between TRK protein expression and specific histopathological types, including their molecular and epidemiological characteristics. We used immunohistochemistry (IHC) as a screening tool for TRK expression, and next-generation sequencing (NGS) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) as confirmatory tests for underlying NTRK-fusion. Among 940 cases, 43 (4.6%) had positive TRK IHC, but in none of these could a NTRK fusion be confirmed by NGS or FISH. IHC-positive cases showed various staining intensities and patterns including cytoplasmatic or nuclear staining. IHC-positivity was more common in squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) (10.3%) and adenoid cystic carcinoma (40.0%), where the majority showed heterogeneous staining intensity. In comparison, only 1.1% of the adenocarcinomas were positive. IHC-positivity was also more common in men, but this association could be explained by the dominance of LUSC in TRK IHC-positive cases. Protein expression was not associated with differences in time to relapse or overall survival. Our study indicates that NTRK fusion is rare in early-stage lung cancer. Due to the high level of false positive cases with IHC, Pan-TRK IHC is less suited as a screening tool for NTRK-fusions in LUSC and adenoid cystic carcinoma.

NTRK2 expression in gastrointestinal stromal tumors with a special emphasis on the clinicopathological and prognostic impacts

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are typically characterized by activating mutations of the KIT proto-oncogene receptor tyrosine kinase (KIT) or platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha (PDGFRA). Recently, the neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK) fusion was reported in a small subset of wild-type GIST. We examined trk IHC and NTRK gene expressions in GIST. Pan-trk immunohistochemistry (IHC) was positive in 25 (all 16 duodenal and 9 out of 16 small intestinal GISTs) of 139 cases, and all pan-trk positive cases showed diffuse and strong expression of c-kit. Interestingly, all of these cases showed only trkB but not trkA/trkC expression. Cap analysis of gene expression (CAGE) analysis identified increased number of genes whose promoters were activated in pan-trk/trkB positive GISTs. Imbalanced expression of NTRK2, which suggests the presence of NTRK2 fusion, was not observed in any of trkB positive GISTs, despite higher mRNA expression. TrkB expression was found in duodenal GISTs and more than half of small intestinal GISTs, and this subset of cases showed poor prognosis. However, there was not clear difference in clinical outcomes according to the trkB expression status in small intestinal GISTs. These findings may provide a possible hypothesis for trkB overexpression contributing to the tumorigenesis and aggressive clinical outcome in GISTs of duodenal origin.

Pan-TRK immunohistochemistry in gynaecological mesenchymal tumours: diagnostic implications and pitfalls.

NTRK-rearranged sarcomas of the female genital tract mainly occur in the uterus (more commonly cervix than corpus) and are characterized by a "fibrosarcoma-like" morphology and NTRK gene rearrangements. These neoplasms may exhibit histological overlap with other entities and can present diagnostic difficulties without molecular confirmation. Pan-TRK immunohistochemistry was developed to identify tumours harbouring NTRK rearrangements. The aim of this study was to characterize pan-TRK immunohistochemical expression in a large cohort of gynaecological mesenchymal neoplasms and investigate the utility of pan-TRK immunohistochemistry todistinguish NTRK-rearranged sarcoma from its mimics. A total of 473 gynaecological mesenchymal tumours (461 without known NTRK fusions and 12 NTRK-rearranged sarcomas) were selected. Pan-TRK immunohistochemistry (EPR17341, Abcam) was performed on whole tissue sections and tissue microarrays. Molecular interrogation of pan-TRK positive tumours was performed by RNA sequencing or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Of the 12 NTRK-rearranged sarcomas, 11 (92%) exhibited diffuse (≥70%) cytoplasmic pan-TRK staining with moderate/marked intensity, while the other wasnegative. Eleven (2.4%) additional tumours also exhibited pan-TRK immunohistochemical expression: three low-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas, seven high-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas, and an undifferentiated uterine sarcoma. Molecular confirmation of the absence of NTRK rearrangements was possible in nine of these tumours. Of these nine neoplasms, seven exhibited focal/multifocal (<70%) pan-TRK cytoplasmic staining with weak/moderate intensity. Even though pan-TRK immunohistochemical expression is not entirely sensitive or specific for NTRK-rearranged sarcomas, these neoplasms tend to exhibit diffuse staining of moderate/strong intensity, unlike its mimics. Pan-TRK should be performed in monomorphic uterine (corpus and cervix) spindle cell neoplasms that are negative for smooth muscle markers and hormone receptors and positive for CD34 and/ or S100. Ultimately, the diagnosis requires molecular confirmation.

Pan-TRK immunohistochemistry as screening tool for NTRK fusions: A diagnostic workflow for the identification of positive patients in clinical practice.

Pan-TRK inhibitors Entrectinib and Larotrectinib have been recently approved as tumor-agnostic therapies in NTRK1-2-3 rearranged patients and there is therefore an urgent need to identify reliable and accessible biomarkers for capturing NTRK fusions in the real-world practice. We aim to assess the analytical validity of the recently released pan-TRK assay (Ventana), running a head-to-head comparison between immunohistochemistry and Archer FusionPlex Lung Panel (ArcherDX) that is designed to detect key fusions in 13 genes, also including NTRK1-3. Pan-TRK IHC and NGS analysis were conducted on a retrospective/prospective cohort of 124 cancer patients (carcinomas, 93 cases; soft tissue sarcomas, 19; primary central nervous system tumours, 10; and neuroblastomas, 2). FISH data were available in most of the IHC/NGS discordant cases. A comparison between IHC and NGS results was carried out in 117 cases: among 30 pan-TRK positive cases, NTRK rearrangement by NGS was found in 11 (37%), while one of the 87 (1.1%) pan-TRK negative cases (a case of NSCLC) showed a TPM3-NRTK1 rearrangement by NGS. Accordingly, sensitivity and specificity of IHC in predicting NTRK status were 91.7% and 81.9%, respectively, while negative (NPV) and positive predictive value (PPV) were 98.8% and 36.7%, respectively. These data lead to suggest that IHC with VENTANA pan-TRK antibody can be a reliable screening tool for the identification of patients potentially bearing NTRK rearranged tumours.

Canadian Multicentric Pan-TRK (CANTRK) Immunohistochemistry Harmonization Study

Tumor-agnostic testing for NTRK1-3 gene rearrangements is required to identify patients who may benefit from TRK inhibitor therapies. The overarching objective of this study was to establish a high-quality pan-TRK immunohistochemistry (IHC) screening assay among 18 large regional pathology laboratories across Canada using pan-TRK monoclonal antibody clone EPR17341 in a ring study design. TRK-fusion positive and negative tumor samples were collected from participating sites, with fusion status confirmed by panel next-generation sequencing assays. Each laboratory received: (1) unstained sections from 30 cases of TRK-fusion-positive or -negative tumors, (2) 2 types of reference standards: TRK calibrator slides and IHC critical assay performance controls (iCAPCs), (3) EPR17341 antibody, and (4) suggestions for developing IHC protocols. Participants were asked to optimize the IHC protocol for their instruments and detection systems by using iCAPCs, to stain the 30 study cases, and to report the percentage scores for membranous, cytoplasmic, and nuclear staining. TRK calibrators were used to assess the analytical sensitivity of IHC protocols developed by using the 2 reference standards. Fifteen of 18 laboratories achieved diagnostic sensitivity of 100% against next-generation sequencing. The diagnostic specificity ranged from 40% to 90%. The results did not differ significantly between positive scores based on the presence of any type of staining vs the presence of overall staining in ≥1% of cells. The median limit of detection measured by TRK calibrators was 76,000 molecules/cell (range 38,000 to >200,000 molecules/cell). Three different patterns of staining were observed in 19 TRK-positive cases, cytoplasmic-only in 7 samples, nuclear and cytoplasmic in 9 samples, and cytoplasmic and membranous in 3 samples. The Canadian multicentric pan-TRK study illustrates a successful strategy to accelerate the multicenter harmonization and implementation of pan-TRK immunohistochemical screening that achieves high diagnostic sensitivity by using laboratory-developed tests where laboratories used centrally developed reference materials. The measurement of analytical sensitivity by using TRK calibrators provided additional insights into IHC protocol performance.

The efficacy of the TRK inhibitor entrectinib in patients with extracranial &lt;i&gt;NTRK&lt;/i&gt; fusion-positive tumors

Somatic translocations involving the NTRK genes occur in 0.34–2.2% of all malignant neoplasms in children. TRK inhibitors whose efficacy has been demonstrated in prospective clinical studies expand treatment options for patients with solid tumors harboring NTRK gene rearrangements. The aim of our study was to summarize the first Russian experience with the use of the TRK inhibitor entrectinib in patients with extracranial NTRK fusion-positive solid tumors included in the compassionate use program. This study was approved by the Independent Ethics Committee and the Academic Council of the Dmitry Rogachev National Medical Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology. The study included 8 patients who had been treated at the Dmitry Rogachev National Medical Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology and the N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology. The main criteria for inclusion in the compassionate use program were a confirmed rearrangement of either NTRK1/2/3 genes in a solid tumor in patients with unresectable disease for whom no effective standard systemic therapy was available, progressive or recurrent disease during therapy prescribed according to the established diagnosis, risk group and risk stratification criteria, and the infeasibility of non-mutilating radical surgery. The median age at diagnosis was 4.3 months (range 1.2–83.6). The male to female ratio was 1:1. The primary site distribution was as follows: head and neck (n = 6; 75%), chest wall (n = 1; 12.5%), pelvis (n = 1; 12.5%). None of the patients had regional lymph node involvement or distant metastases at diagnosis. The distribution by histology (according to histopathology reports) was as follows: infantile fibrosarcoma (n = 4; 50%), undifferentiated round cell sarcoma, low-grade (n = 1; 12.5%), undifferentiated spindle cell sarcoma, high-grade (n = 1; 12.5%), NTRK-rearranged spindle cell sarcoma, low-grade (n = 1; 12.5%), spindle cell tumor associated with an NTRK rearrangement (n = 1; 12.5%). Immunohistochemistry (IHC) with a pan-Trk monoclonal antibody was performed in 7/8 (87.5%) patients. Pan-Trk IHC was positive in 4/7 (57%) patients. Rearrangements in the NTRK1 and NTRK3 genes were confirmed in all the patients. The final methods used for the detection of fusion transcripts were as follows: reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (n = 4; 50%) and RNA-based next-generation sequencing (n = 4; 50%). NTRK1 and NTRK3 gene translocations were detected in 3/8 (37.5%) and 5/8 (62.5%) patients, respectively. The following fusion transcripts were identified: ETV6::NTRK3 (n = 4), DIP2C::NTRK3 (n = 1), TPR::NTRK1 (n = 1), TPM3::NTRK1 (n = 1), MYH10::NTRK1 (n = 1). One (12.5%) patient received entrectinib as first-line therapy, other patients (7/8, 87.5%) received entrectinib as secondor subsequent-line therapy. Three (37.5%) patients had undergone surgery before treatment with entrectinib: 2 had R2 resection, 1 had R0/R1 resection (resection margins were not evaluated). None of the patients received radiation therapy. The median duration of entrectinib therapy at the time of analysis was 11.8 months (range 2.3–20.1). Delayed surgery was performed in 2/8 patients; according to the histopathology reports, they achieved grade IV pathomorphosis. Three patients experienced adverse events during treatment with entrectinib. The median time to adverse events was 0.23 months (range 0.2–7.96). Three patients required temporary interruption in treatment to relieve symptoms, a subsequent dose reduction by one dose level was necessary when resuming therapy in two patients. The median follow-up since diagnosis was 19.5 months (range 14.9–75.0). All the patients included in our analysis were alive, three of them had no radiologic evidence of disease. Fifty percent of the patients completed targeted therapy, another 50% of the patients continued treatment with entrectinib. Complete and very good partial response was achieved in 3/8 and 2/8 patients, respectively. Partial response, minor partial response and stable disease were observed in one patient each. These results indicate high efficacy and safety of entrectinib in pediatric patients with extracranial NTRK fusion-positive solid tumors. Further studies are needed to determine the therapeutic potential of TRK inhibitors in the treatment of different solid malignant neoplasms in children and to assess long-term treatment results.

Prevalence and clinico-genomic characteristics of patients with TRK fusion cancer in China

Neurotrophic tyrosine kinase (NTRK) fusions involving NTRK1, NTRK2, and NTRK3 were found in a broad range of solid tumors as driver gene variants. However, the prevalence of NTRK fusions in Chinese solid tumor patients is rarely reported. Based on the next-generation sequencing data from 10,194 Chinese solid tumor patients, we identified approximately 0.4% (40/10,194) of Chinese solid tumor patients with NTRK fusion. NTRK fusions were most frequently detected in soft tissue sarcoma (3.0%), especially in the fibrosarcoma subtype (12.7%). A total of 29 NTRK fusion patterns were identified, of which 11 were rarely reported. NTRK fusion mostly co-occurred with TP53 (38%), CDKN2A (23%), and ACVR2A (18%) and rarely with NTRK amplification (5.0%) and single nucleotide variants (2.5%). DNA-based NTRK fusion sequencing exhibited a higher detection rate than pan-TRK immunohistochemistry (100% vs. 87.5%). Two patients with NTRK fusions showed clinical responses to larotrectinib, supporting the effective response of NTRK fusion patients to TRK inhibitors.

NTRK gene aberrations in triple-negative breast cancer: detection challenges using IHC, FISH, RT-PCR, and NGS.

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is usually an aggressive disease with a poor prognosis and limited treatment options. The neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK) gene fusions are cancer type-agnostic emerging biomarkers approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), USA, for the selection of patients for targeted therapy. The main aim of our study was to investigate the frequency of NTRK aberrations, i.e. fusions, gene copy number gain, and amplification, in a series of TNBC using different methods. A total of 83 TNBCs were analyzed using pan-TRK immunohistochemistry (IHC), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), and RNA-based next-generation sequencing (NGS). Of 83 cases, 16 showed pan-TRK positivity although no cases had NTRK-fusions. Indeed, FISH showed four cases carrying an atypical NTRK1 pattern consisting of one fusion signal and one/more single green signals, but all cases were negative for fusion by NGS and RT-PCR testing. In addition, FISH analysis showed six cases with NTRK1 amplification, one case with NTRK2 copy number gain, and five cases with NTRK3 copy number gain, all negative for pan-TRK IHC. Our data demonstrate that IHC has a high false-positive rate for the detection of fusions and molecular testing is mandatory; there is no need to perform additional molecular tests in cases negativity for NTRK by IHC. In conclusion, the NTRK genes are not involved in fusions in TNBC, but both copy number gain and amplification are frequent events, suggesting a possible predictive role for other NTRK aberrations.

Elaboration of NTRK-rearranged colorectal cancer: Integration of immunoreactivity pattern, cytogenetic identity, and rearrangement variant

Fused information from protein status, DNA breakage, and transcripts are still limited because of the low rate of activated-NTRK in colorectal cancer (CRC). In total, 104 archived CRC tissue samples with dMMR were analyzed using immunohistochemistry (IHC), polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and pyrosequencing to mine the NTRK-enriched CRC group, and then subjected to NTRK fusion detection using pan-tyrosine kinase IHC, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and DNA-/RNA-based next generation sequencing (NGS) assays. Of the 15 NTRK-enriched CRCs, eight NTRK fusions (53.3%, 8/15), including two TPM3(e7)-NTRK1(e10), one TPM3(e5)-NTRK1(e11), one LMNA(e10)-NTRK1(e10), two EML4(e2)-NTRK3(e14), and two ETV6(e5)-NTRK3(e15) fusions, were identified. There was no immunoreactivity for ETV6-NTRK3 fusion. In addition to cytoplasmic staining found in six specimens, membrane positive (TPM3-NTRK1 fusion) and nuclear positive (LMNA-NTRK1 fusion) were also observed in two of them. Atypical FISH-positive types were observed in four cases. Unlike IHC, NTRK-rearranged tumors appeared homogeneous on FISH. ETV6-NTRK3 may be missed in pan-TRK IHC screening for CRC. Regarding break-apart FISH, NTRK detection is difficult because of the diversity of signal patterns. Further research is warranted to identify the characteristics of NTRK-fusion CRCs.

Multicenter Harmonization Study of Pan-Trk Immunohistochemistry for the Detection of NTRK3 Fusions

Pan-Trk immunohistochemistry has been described as a screening test for the detection of NTRK fusions in a broad spectrum of tumor types. However, pan-Trk testing in the clinical setting may be limited by many factors, including analytical parameters such as clones, platforms, and protocols used. This study aimed to harmonize pan-Trk testing using various clones and immunohistochemical (IHC) platforms and to evaluate the level of analytical variability across pathology laboratories. We developed several IHC pan-Trk assays using clones EPR17341 (Abcam) and A7H6R (Cell Signaling Technology) on Ventana/Roche, Agilent, and Leica platforms. To compare them, we sent unstained sections of a tissue microarray containing 9 cases with NTRK3 fusions to participating laboratories, to perform staining on Ventana/Roche (10 centers), Agilent (4 centers), and Leica (3 centers) platforms. A ready-to-use pan-Trk IVD assay (Ventana/Roche) was also performed in 3 centers. All slides were centrally and blindly reviewed for the percentage of stained tumor cells. Laboratory-developed tests with clone EPR17341 were able to detect pan-Trk protein expression in all cases, whereas lower rates of positivity were observed with clone A7H6R. Moderate to strong variability of the positive cases rate was observed with both antibodies in each IHC platforms type and each of the positivity cut points evaluated (≥1%, ≥10%, and ≥50% of stained tumor cells). The rate of false-negative cases was lower when pan-Trk staining was assessed with the lowest positivity threshold (≥1%). In conclusion, most evaluated pan-Trk IHC laboratory-developed tests were able to detect NTRK3-fusion proteins; however, a significant analytical variability was observed between antibodies, platforms, and centers.

Comparison of NTRK fusion detection methods in microsatellite-instability-high metastatic colorectal cancer

Tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) inhibitors have been approved for metastatic solid tumors harboring NTRK fusions, but the detection of NTRK fusions is challenging. International guidelines recommend pan-TRK immunohistochemistry (IHC) screening followed by next generation sequencing (NGS) in tumor types with low prevalence of NTRK fusions, including metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). RNA-based NGS is preferred, but is expensive, time-consuming, and extracting good-quality RNA from FFPE tissue is challenging. Alternatives in daily clinical practice are warranted. We assessed the diagnostic performance of RNA-NGS, FFPE-targeted locus capture (FFPE-TLC), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and the 5′/3′ imbalance quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) after IHC screening in 268 patients with microsatellite-instability-high mCRC, the subgroup in which NTRK fusions are most prevalent (1–5%). A consensus result was determined after review of all assay results. In 16 IHC positive tumors, 10 NTRK fusions were detected. In 33 IHC negative samples, no additional transcribed NTRK fusions were found, underscoring the high sensitivity of IHC. Sensitivity of RNA-NGS, FFPE-TLC, FISH, and qRT-PCR was 90%, 90%, 78%, and 100%, respectively. Specificity was 100% for all assays. Robustness, defined as the percentage of samples that provided an interpretable result in the first run, was 100% for FFPE-TLC, yet more limited for RNA-NGS (85%), FISH (70%), and qRT-PCR (70%). Overall, we do not recommend FISH for the detection of NTRK fusions in mCRC due to its low sensitivity and limited robustness. We conclude that RNA-NGS, FFPE-TLC, and qRT-PCR are appropriate assays for NTRK fusion detection, after enrichment with pan-TRK IHC, in routine clinical practice.