Abstract Background The oesophagogastric cancer (OGC) staging pathway is extensive, contributing to prolonged waiting times from referral to treatment. NHS England guidance details the ideal timeframe from referral to finalisation of the patient’s treatment plan and stipulates a time of 21 days from OGD to communication of the treatment plan to the patient. This audit aims to compare pathway times at a tertiary cancer centre, which accepts referrals from seven different hospitals, to the current NHS target and further stratify pathway times according to patient characteristics and referring hospitals. Method Data was collected using a prospectively collected database of OGC patients who underwent staging investigations at the tertiary centre between October 2022 and October 2023. The primary outcome was OGD to communication of the treatment plan. Secondary outcomes included time from OGD to first staging investigation and the proportion of patients that had a next-day computed tomography (CT) scan. Outcomes were stratified to investigate inter-hospital variation and the effect of curative status and tumour location. Data was expressed as median and interquartile range (IQR) for continuous data or n (%) if categorical. Results 263 patients were included in this audit with a median age of 69.0 (IQR 61.5-77.0). 13.8% of patients satisfied the target time of 21 days from OGD to communication of treatment plan. Curative patients had a longer median pathway time than palliative patients (49.0 vs 35.0 days), whereas oesophageal and gastric cancer patients had similar pathway times (44.0 vs 44.5 days). Patients diagnosed at the tertiary centre had a faster time from OGD to first staging investigation than patients diagnosed at non-specialist centres. Only 13.3% of patients had a next-day CT scan following their OGD (median time 5.0 days). Conclusion The OGC staging pathway is considerably slower than the target. Faster pathway times in palliative patients can be attributed to many of these patients not requiring further staging post-CT. Potentially, targets should be re-evaluated to distinguish between palliative and curative patients. The faster staging process at the central hospital may be explained by more regular clinics run by specialist clinicians and the prompt requesting of staging investigations without awaiting MDT discussions. Alongside increasing the proportion of next-day CT scans, these factors must be addressed to streamline the entire pathway.
Read full abstract