Palliative Care Telehealth Research Articles

Assessing Telehealth in Palliative Care: A Systematic Review of the Effectiveness and Challenges in Rural and Underserved Areas.

The integration of telehealth into palliative care has garnered significant attention due to its potential to enhance both access and quality of care, particularly for patients in rural and underserved areas. This interest stems from the need to address geographical and logistical barriers that traditionally hinder palliative care delivery. Despite its potential benefits, the effectiveness of telehealth and the challenges associated with its implementation remain underexplored, necessitating further investigation. This study aims to critically evaluate the effectiveness of telehealth in palliative care by focusing on several key areas: its impact on access to care, symptom management, patient satisfaction, and cost-effectiveness. To achieve this, a systematic review was conducted, synthesizing data from various studies that investigated telehealth interventions within palliative care settings. The review employed a comprehensive search strategy across electronic databases, concentrating on randomized controlled trials (RTCs) published between 2014 and 2024. To ensure the reliability of the findings, low-quality and unrelated studies were excluded, and the remaining studies were meticulously analyzed for bias and methodological quality. The review's findings indicate that telehealth significantly enhances access to palliative care, allowing patients to receive timely and appropriate care without the need for extensive travel. It also improves symptom management and patient satisfaction, aligning to provide patient-centered care. Additionally, telehealth is cost-effective by reducing expenses associated with travel and in-person visits. These benefits highlight telehealth's potential to address some of the critical challenges in palliative care delivery. Despite its advantages, implementing telehealth in palliative care is not without challenges. Technological barriers, such as inadequate infrastructure and device limitations, pose significant hurdles. Integration issues, including the need for seamless incorporation into existing care systems, and varying levels of digital literacy among patients and caregivers, also impact the effectiveness of telehealth. Addressing these challenges is crucial for optimizing telehealth's implementation. Ensuring that telehealth solutions are accessible, user-friendly, and well-integrated into care practices is essential for fully leveraging its potential benefits.

Cross-sectional study to evaluate patients’ medication management with a new model of care: incorporating a pharmacist into a community specialist palliative care telehealth service

BackgroundPatients receiving palliative care are often on complex medication regimes to manage their symptoms and comorbidities and at high risk of medication-related problems. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to evaluate the involvement of a pharmacist to an existing community specialist palliative care telehealth service on patients’ medication management.MethodThe specialist palliative care pharmacist attended two palliative care telehealth sessions per week over a six-month period (October 2020 to March 2021). Attendance was allocated based on funding received. Data collected from the medication management reviews included prevalence of polypharmacy, number of inappropriate medication according to the Screening Tool of Older Persons Prescriptions in Frail adults with limited life expectancy criteria (STOPP/FRAIL) and recommendations on deprescribing, symptom control and medication management.ResultsIn total 95 patients participated in the pharmaceutical telehealth service with a mean age of 75.2 years (SD 10.67). Whilst 81 (85.3%) patients had a cancer diagnosis, 14 (14.7%) had a non-cancer diagnosis. At referral, 84 (88.4%, SD 4.57) patients were taking ≥ 5 medications with 51 (53.7%, SD 5.03) taking ≥ 10 medications. According to STOPP/FRAIL criteria, 142 potentially inappropriate medications were taken by 54 (56.8%) patients, with a mean of 2.6 (SD 1.16) inappropriate medications per person. Overall, 142 recommendations were accepted from the pharmaceutical medication management review including 49 (34.5%) related to deprescribing, 20 (14.0%) to medication-related problems, 35 (24.7%) to symptom management and 38 (26.8%) to medication administration.ConclusionThis study provided evidence regarding the value of including a pharmacist in palliative care telehealth services. Input from the pharmacist resulted in improved symptom management of community palliative care patients and their overall medication management.

Evolution of Telehealth-Its Impact on Palliative Care and Medication Management.

Palliative care plays a crucial role in enhancing the quality of life for individuals facing serious illnesses, aiming to alleviate suffering and provide holistic support. With the advent of telehealth, there is a growing interest in leveraging technology to extend the reach and effectiveness of palliative care services. This article provides a comprehensive review of the evolution of telehealth, the current state of telemedicine in palliative care, and the role of telepharmacy and medication management. Herein we highlight the potential benefits, challenges, and future directions of palliative telemedicine. As the field continues to advance, the article proposes key considerations for future research, policy development, and clinical implementation, aiming to maximize the advantages of telehealth in assisting individuals and their families throughout the palliative care journey. The comprehensive analysis presented herein contributes to a deeper understanding of the role of telehealth in palliative care and serves as a guide for shaping its future trajectory.

Quality of Outpatient Pediatric Palliative Care Telehealth: A Retrospective Chart Review

ContextStudies suggest the feasibility and acceptability of telehealth in outpatient pediatric palliative care. However, there is a need for data that describes the implementation and quality of telehealth, relying on objective and validated measures. ObjectiveWe sought to compare the provision of pediatric palliative care by delivery method. MethodsWe conducted a retrospective electronic health record review of patients seen by our outpatient palliative care team over a two-year period. Demographic, diagnostic, and health utilization data as well as encounter characteristics were compared between patients seen in person (IP), through telehealth (TH), and both (IP/TH). ResultsThree hundred ninety-four patients were evaluated with 889 outpatient pediatric palliative care encounters. Non-English speaking patients were less likely to receive palliative care through TH, as were patients without active patient portals. Median follow-up time was longer for patients seen through TH or IP/TH. Patients with malignancies were seen more frequently IP while children with neurologic diagnoses, technology dependence, and a higher number of complex chronic conditions were seen more frequently via TH. Health outcomes, end of life quality metrics, and encounter-level quality indicators were similar across care delivery methods. Review of systems, pain, and mood management, and advance care planning happened more frequently IP while goals of care discussions and medical decision-making happened more through TH. ConclusionDespite differences in patients seen and palliative interventions provided in person compared to telehealth, health outcomes, and quality indicators were similar across care delivery methods. These data support the continued practice of telehealth in palliative care and highlight the need for equity in its evolution.

Telehealth Preferences Among Patients With Advanced Cancer in the Post COVID-19 Vaccine Era

BackgroundFew studies have examined patient preferences for telehealth in palliative care after the availability of COVID-19 vaccines. We examined patient preferences for video versus in-person visits and factors contributing to preferences in the postvaccine era. MethodsThis is a cross-sectional survey of patients who were seen at our palliative care clinic between April 2021 and March 2022. Patients were surveyed directly their preference for either video or in-person visits for outpatient palliative care (primary outcome). We also surveyed preferences including convenience, cost, wait time, and perceptions of COVID-19 safety regarding their palliative virtual-video visit. We examined clinical factors associated with preferences with multivariate logistic regression. ResultsAbout 200 patients completed the survey. 132 (67%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 60%, 74%) preferred virtual-video, while 16 (8%) preferred in-person visits during the COVID-19 pandemic. About 120 (61%, 95%CI: 54%, 68%) preferred virtual-video after the pandemic. Patients perceived virtual-video favorably regarding travel and related costs (179 [91%]), convenience (175 [88%]), and wait time (136 [69%]). Multivariable analysis showed concerns for catching COVID-19 from healthcare providers (odds ratio [OR]: 4.20; 95%CI: 1.24–14.25; P = 0.02) and feeling comfortable with computers or mobile devices (OR: 4.59; 95%CI: 1.02, 20.60; P = 0.047) were significantly associated with preferring virtual-video. Patients who were of Hispanic or Latino ethnicity (OR: 0.25; 95%CI: 0.09, 0.71) and had increased dypsnea (OR: 0.74; 95%CI: 0.59, 0.93) were less likely to prefer video over in-person. ConclusionPatients expressed strong preference for video over in-person visits in the outpatient palliative care setting.

The impact of an integrated early palliative care telehealth intervention on the quality of life of heart failure patients: a randomized controlled feasibility study

BackgroundWhile palliative care for patients with heart failure has gained global attention, in Iran most palliative care interventions have focused only on cancer patients. The purpose of this study is to determine the feasibility and acceptability of a telehealth palliative care intervention to improve the quality of life in patients with heart failure in Iran.MethodsThis single-site, pilot randomized controlled trial of a telehealth palliative care intervention versus usual care was conducted on patients with New York Heart Association class II/III heart failure recruited from a heart failure clinic in Iran. Under the supervision of a nurse interventionist, intervention participants received 6 weekly educational webinars and concurrent WhatsApp® group activities, with 6 weeks of follow-up. Feasibility was assessed by measuring recruitment, attrition, and questionnaire completion rates; acceptability was assessed via telephone interviews asking about satisfaction and attitudes. Secondary outcomes measured at baseline and 6 weeks included quality of life (PKCCQ and FACIT-Pal-14), anxiety and depression (HADS), and emergency department visits.ResultsWe recruited and randomized 50 patients (mean age 47.5 years, 60% men). Among those approached for consent, 66% of patients agreed to participate and total study attrition was 10%. Also 68% of patients successfully completed at least 4 out of the 6 webinar sessions. Acceptability: 78% of patient participants expressed willingness to participate in the present study again or recommend other patients to participate. There was a trend towards improvement in anxiety and depression scores in the intervention group though the study was not powered to detect a statistical difference.ConclusionThis nurse-led, early telehealth-palliative care intervention demonstrated evidence of feasibility, acceptability, and potential improvement on quality of life in patients with heart failure in Iran.Trial registrationThe study was registered at the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT) at 14 November, 2021, and can be found on the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials Platform.IRCT registration number: IRCT20100725004443N29.

Understanding Experiences of Telehealth in Palliative Care: An Exploration Using Photo Interviewing (Preprint)

Understanding Experiences of Telehealth in Palliative Care: An Exploration Using Photo Interviewing (Preprint)

Barriers Associated With Missed Palliative Care Telehealth Visits.

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the adoption of telehealth in palliative care. While this technology showed efficiencies in healthcare delivery, it also unmasked inequalities affecting the socially disadvantaged. Objective: To identify factors associated with missed telehealth visits. Methods: We reviewed telehealth visits between April 1, 2020 and March 31, 2021 at a palliative care clinic. Disease-related and demographic information were recorded, including residency in community outreach zones (COZ)-zip code clusters known for healthcare underutilization. We categorized patients with at least one missed visit as "any miss" (AM), and those with at least three scheduled visits and missed at least 50% as "pattern miss" (PM). Results: Of 1225 scheduled telehealth (i.e., audiovisual) visits, there were 802 completed, 52 missed initial and 371 missed follow-up encounters. Among 505 unique patients, 363 (72%) were receiving cancer treatment, 170 (34%) had multiple insurance, 87 (17%) lived in COZ, 101 (20%) were AM, and 27 (5%) were PM. Patients in COZ had significantly higher risk of PM vs those outside (OR = 2.56, 95% CI: 1.06-5.78, P = .03). Patients with multiple insurance had significantly higher risk of PM vs those with single or no coverage (OR = 3.06, 95% CI: 1.40-6.93, P = .006). Patients on treatment had significantly higher risk of AM vs those not in treatment (OR = 1.75, 95% CI: 1.05-3.06, P = .04). Conclusion: We identified living in areas with healthcare underutilization, active cancer treatment, and multiple insurance coverage as barriers to telehealth visits. Measures are necessary to attenuate disparities in accessing palliative care via telehealth.

Telehealth in palliative care during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic mixed studies review.

The coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic caused unprecedented disruption to healthcare delivery worldwide. The use of telehealth practices rapidly expanded during the pandemic, while its application in palliative care remains a conflicted issue. The aims of this study were to evaluate users' reports of their satisfaction with telehealth palliative care during COVID-19 and to identify facilitators and barriers to telehealth implementation in palliative care during COVID-19. A systematic search of the literature, including studies between January 2020 and June 2022, was conducted using PubMed, MEDLINE, CINAHL Plus, Embase, and Google Scholar. Empirical studies of telehealth in palliative care during COVID-19 were included. A total of 18 studies were included in the review, of which nine were outpatient consultations, four were family meetings, two were remote volunteering programs, two were inpatient care, and one was a residential care home needs assessment. The satisfaction rates were high (66%-99%) among patients and family members who participated in telehealth consultations, but the satisfaction with family meetings was mixed. Compared with their clients, healthcare professionals were less likely to assess telehealth as satisfactory. The authors identified four barriers and four facilitators. The barriers were technological challenges, lack of nonverbal communication, ethical concerns, and limitations for clinical practice. The facilitators were accessibility and convenience, visual cues, facilitation and training, and family engagement. This systematic mixed studies review suggests that current evidence supports the feasibility of telehealth implementation in palliative care for outpatient consultations and routine follow-up appointments. This review also identified facilitators and barriers to telehealth in palliative care, and the findings can inform the implementation of future palliative care services. Future attention should be paid to the effectiveness of telehealth implementation in palliative care patients.

Referral patterns and consultation locations for a novel palliative care telehealth service

Background The optimal location to conduct telehealth consultations for rural Australian palliative patients was unclear prior to starting a novel palliative telehealth service in Queensland. The present study sought to collect data which may suggest the best location for such consultations so that future service provision can be planned accordingly. Methods A retrospective review of the referral patterns and demographic data between March 2020 and November 2020 was undertaken with a focus on the number of referrals, location of consultations, and the source of referrals. Results 153 referrals resulted in 526 unique consultations. All referrals in the first month came from the local public hospital. After 4 months, public hospital referrals and private family doctor referrals accounted for 30% and 50% respectively. The proportion of telehealth consultations delivered in the patient’s home increased throughout the eight-month period. There was no obvious relationship between referral source and consultation location. Conclusion The patient’s home was the preferred location for all specialist telehealth care and patient preference was the main determinant of consult location. Further research should involve qualitative analysis of these factors to optimize the delivery of this service and the design of other similar services.

UNDERSTANDING THE PALLIATIVE CARE INFORMATION CIRCULATING ON TWITTER DURING THE CORONAVIRUS PANDEMIC

Abstract Palliative care is a growing medical specialty. While its value has become particularly evident during the pandemic, it faces various challenges including misconceptions among the general public, a lack of awareness of its benefits, and limited/sporadic access and coverage by Medicare. Given the increasing number of people sharing their health information and seeking healthcare information on social media where misinformation is widely spread, this study examined types of information on palliative care circulated on Twitter. A total of 26,495 English Tweets were collected 01/01/2020 – 12/30/2021 using the keywords “Palliative” and “Covid” or “Corona”. We manually developed a framework for coding/classifying the first 6,000 Tweets. Of those, 5,308 were unrelated Tweets (e.g., advertising palliative care seminars/conferences). Among the remaining Tweets, persistent myths were observed (e.g., palliative care is only for dying people) and were labeled accordingly. In addition, while some people mentioned negative impact of the pandemic on palliative care (e.g., shortage of beds), others found value in palliative care and reported positive changes due to the pandemic (e.g., telehealth in palliative care). Consequently, the following categories were defined for Tweets: i) Recognized benefits (203 Tweets); ii) Positive impact of the pandemic on palliative care (120 Tweets); iii) Negative impact of the pandemic on palliative care (333 Tweets); iv) Myth (63 Tweets). We will use these manually classified Tweets to train machine-learning algorithms to automatically classify the remaining tweets, aiming to obtain a comprehensive understanding of palliative care information circulating on Twitter and seek ways to promote palliative care use.

The role of telehealth on quality of life of palliative care patients during the COVID-19 pandemic: an integrative review.

Telehealth looks to be a viable tool to meet patients' expectations and requirements during home treatment; however, there are obstacles to overcome. Palliative care has been described as 'high touch' rather than 'high tech', which may restrict healthcare workers' enthusiasm in integrating technological advances into the development and refinement of interventions. As a result, the goal of this integrative review was to map and evaluate existing research on the use of telemedicine and telehealth in palliative care patients during the COVID-19 outbreak. This review was guided using the PRISMA Model and CASP guidelines. A total of 17 articles on the use of telehealth in palliative care satisfied the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the review. This integrative review provided more evidence for the function and application of telehealth in palliative care. It demonstrated the resiliency of individuals in swiftly adjusting to a new system or application and the adaptability of healthcare systems and providers in establishing an alternate means of providing treatment to patients during a crisis.

Protocol for an integrative review: patient and families’ perspectives on telehealth in palliative care

IntroductionIncreases in the use of telehealth in palliative care (telepalliative care) prior to, and during, the COVID-19 pandemic have resulted in a proliferation of studies on the topic. While knowledge...

Telehealth in outpatient delivery of palliative care: A qualitative study of patient and physician views.

The COVID-19 pandemic has widened the funded use of telehealth in Australia to support telehealth delivery to all patients in any setting. Increasing the use and experience of telehealth brings to light unique insights into the advantages and challenges of this new model of healthcare delivery This study aimed to qualitatively explore the experiences of both palliative care physicians and patients setting, including their views on its future role in healthcare. This qualitative study was conducted across three metropolitan tertiary palliative care centers in Victoria, Australia between November 2020 and March 2021. Purposive sampling identified 23 participants (12 physicians and 11 patients). Semi-structured interviews focused on the last telehealth consultation, thoughts and impressions of telehealth, and the possibility of telehealth remaining in palliative care. A thematic approach was adopted to code and analyze the data. Telehealth transformed the ways physicians and patients in this study perceived and engaged with outpatient palliative care across the entire continuum of care. Four key themes were identified: (1) access to care; (2) delivery of care; (3) engagement with care; and (4) the future. This study provides novel data bringing together the perspective of patients and physicians, which confirms the utility of telehealth in palliative care. Its convenience enables more frequent review, enables reviews to occur in response to lower levels of concern, and adds toward enhancing the continuity of care across and between settings. Moving forward, support seemed strongest for a hybrid model of telehealth and face-to-face consultations guided by key parameters relating to the level of anticipated complexity.

An Early Palliative Care Telehealth Coaching Intervention to Enhance Advanced Cancer Family Caregivers’ Decision Support Skills: The CASCADE Pilot Factorial Trial (RP404)

An Early Palliative Care Telehealth Coaching Intervention to Enhance Advanced Cancer Family Caregivers’ Decision Support Skills: The CASCADE Pilot Factorial Trial (RP404)

An Early Palliative Care Telehealth Coaching Intervention to Enhance Advanced Cancer Family Caregivers’ Decision Support Skills: The CASCADE Pilot Factorial Trial

An Early Palliative Care Telehealth Coaching Intervention to Enhance Advanced Cancer Family Caregivers’ Decision Support Skills: The CASCADE Pilot Factorial Trial

Telehealth in outpatient delivery of palliative care: a prospective survey evaluation by patients and clinicians.

BackgroundIn Australia during the COVID‐19 pandemic new funding models were introduced to support telehealth consultations, resulting in their widescale adoption in palliative care service delivery. Clarity around the clinical circumstances and patient populations that might be most appropriate for telehealth models was required.AimsTo evaluate patient and physician satisfaction, acceptability and utility of outpatient palliative care provision through telehealth.MethodsThis is a multi‐site prospective, cross‐sectional, observational study conducted during a time of significant public health restrictions. A survey was used to collect matched patient‐ and physician‐reported perceptions of palliative care telehealth consultations across three metropolitan hospitals in Victoria, Australia.ResultsThere were 127 matched patient–physician data of telehealth consultations and a further 812 physician‐only assessments. Telehealth was generally acceptable and satisfactory, with patients providing greater positive scores than clinicians. Telehealth incorporating both audio and video were more acceptable and satisfactory, particularly with the presence of a carer, and during routine reviews. Physicians were less satisfied using telehealth when there was increasing symptom complexity across all domains (pain, psychological, and other symptoms).ConclusionsTelehealth has high utility in palliative care practice. A future hybrid model of care comprising both face‐to‐face and telehealth consultations seems favoured by patients and physicians but must be accompanied by targeted support for specific patient groups to ensure equitable healthcare access. Further evaluation of telehealth during a time of fewer public health emergency measures and lower community anxiety is required to fully understand its ongoing role.

Content of Tele-Palliative Care Consultations with Patients Receiving Dialysis.

Background: Little is known about the content of communication in palliative care telehealth conversations in the dialysis population. Understanding the content and process of these conversations may lead to insights about how palliative care improves quality of life. Methods: We conducted a qualitative analysis of video recordings obtained during a pilot palliative teleconsultation program. We recruited patients receiving dialysis from five facilities affiliated with an academic medical center. Palliative care clinicians conducted teleconsultation using a wall-mounted screen with a camera mounted on a pole and positioned mid-screen in the line of sight to facilitate direct eye contact. Patients used an iPad that was attached to an IV pole positioned next to the dialysis chair. Conversations were coded using a preexisting framework of themes and content from the Serious Illness Conversation Guide (SICG) and revised Edmonton Symptom Assessment System-Renal. Results: We recruited 39 patients to undergo a telepalliative care consultation while receiving dialysis, 34 of whom completed the teleconsultation. Specialty palliative care clinicians (3 physicians and 1 nurse practitioner) conducted 35 visits with 34 patients. Median (interquartile range) duration of conversation was 42 (28-57) minutes. Most frequently discussed content included sources of strength (91%), critical abilities (88%), illness understanding (85%), fears and worries (85%), what family knows (85%), fatigue (77%), and pain (65%). Process features such as summarizing statements (85%) and making a recommendation (82%) were common, whereas connectional silence (56%), and emotion expression (21%) occurred less often. Conclusions: Unscripted palliative care conversations in outpatient dialysis units through telemedicine exhibited many domains recommended by the SICG, with less frequent discussion of symptoms. Emotion expression was uncommon for these conversations that occurred in an open setting.

Use of telehealth in the provision of after-hours palliative care services in rural and remote Australia: A scoping review protocol.

IntroductionAfter-hours services are essential in ensuring patients with life limiting illness and their caregivers are supported to enable continuity of care. Telehealth is a valuable approach to meeting after-hours support needs of people living with life-limiting illness, their families, and caregivers in rural and remote communities. It is important to explore the provision of after-hours palliative care services using telehealth to understand the reach of these services in rural and remote Australia. A preliminary search of databases failed to reveal any scoping or systematic reviews of telehealth in after-hours palliative care services in rural or remote Australia.AimTo review and map the available evidence about the use of telehealth in providing after-hours palliative care services in Australian rural and remote communities.MethodsThe proposed scoping review will be conducted using the Arksey and O’Malley methodological framework and in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews. The reporting of the scoping review will be guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). This review will consider research and evaluation of after-hours services using telehealth for palliative care stakeholders in rural and remote Australia. Peer reviewed studies and grey literature published in English from 2000 to May 2021 will be included. Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL Complete, Embase via Ovid, PsycINFO via Ovid, Emcare via Ovid, Medline via Ovid, and grey literature will be searched for relevant articles. Titles and abstracts will be screened by two independent reviewers for assessment against the inclusion criteria. Data will be extracted and analysed by two reviewers using an adapted data extraction tool and thematic analysis techniques. Diagrams, tables, and summary narratives will be used to map, summarise and thematically group the characteristics of palliative care telehealth services in rural and remote Australia, including stakeholders’ perceptions and benefits and challenges of the services.

A lay navigator-led, early palliative care intervention for African American and rural family caregivers of individuals with advanced cancer (Project Cornerstone): Results of a pilot randomized trial.

The objective of this study was to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and potential efficacy of ENABLE (Educate, Nurture, Advise, Before Life Ends) Cornerstone-a lay navigator-led, early palliative care telehealth intervention for African American/Black and/or rural-dwelling family caregivers of individuals with advanced cancer (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03464188). This was a pilot randomized trial (November 2019 to March 2021). Family caregivers of patients with newly diagnosed, stage III/IV, solid-tumor cancers were randomized to receive either an intervention or usual care. Intervention caregivers were paired with a specially trained lay navigator who delivered 6 weekly, 20-minute to 60-minute telehealth coaching sessions plus monthly follow-up for 24 weeks, reviewing skills in stress management, self-care, getting help, staying organized, and future planning. Feasibility was assessed according to the completion of sessions and questionnaires (predefined as a completion rate ≥80%). Acceptability was determined through intervention participants' ratings of their likelihood of recommending the intervention. Measures of caregiver distress and quality of life were collected at 8 and 24 weeks. Sixty-three family caregivers were randomized (usual care, n = 32; intervention, n = 31). Caregivers completed 65% of intervention sessions and 87% of questionnaires. Average ratings for recommending the program were 9.4, from 1 (not at all likely) to 10 (extremely likely). Over 24 weeks, the mean ± SE Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale score improved by 0.30 ± 1.44 points in the intervention group and worsened by 1.99 ± 1.39 points in the usual care group (difference, -2.29; Cohen d, -0.32). The mean between-group difference scores in caregiver quality of life was -1.56 (usual care - intervention; d, -0.07). Similar outcome results were observed for patient participants. The authors piloted ENABLE Cornerstone, an intervention for African American and rural-dwelling advanced cancer family caregivers. The acceptability of the intervention and data collection rates were high, and the preliminary efficacy for caregiver distress was promising. To date, very few programs have been developed to support under-resourced cancer family caregivers. To address this need, the authors successfully pilot tested an early palliative care program, called Educate, Nurture, Advise, Before Life Ends (ENABLE) Cornerstone, for African American and rural family caregivers of individuals with advanced cancer. Cornerstone is led by specially trained lay people and involves a series of weekly phone sessions focused on coaching caregivers to manage stress and provide effective support to patients with cancer. The authors are now testing Cornerstone in a larger trial. If the program demonstrates benefit, it may yield a model of caregiver support that could be widely implemented.