Paliperidone Research Articles

Combining ion-pair strategy and percutaneous permeation enhancers to develop sustained-release paliperidone patch

In this study, a sustained-release paliperidone (PAL) patch was developed using a combination of ion-pair strategy and percutaneous permeation enhancers (PPEs). The ion-pair strategy was used to improve drug-adhesive miscibility and control drug release. PPEs were used to break SC barrier function to facilitate drug skin permeation. The in vitro skin permeation experiments using single-factor experiments and Box-Behnken design gave the optimized formulation, a 55 μm adhesive thickness patch with 7 % (w/w) PAL-LA (Lauric acid), 9.7 % (w/w) Plurol® Oleique CC 497 (POCC). Moreover, the pharmacokinetic study confirmed its potential in sustained-release transdermal patch with longer MRT0-t (18.35 ± 3.11 h) and higher BA (63.14 %) than the gavage group (Cmax = 6.64 ± 2.61 μg/mL, MRT0-t = 2.88 ± 1.06 h, BA = 45.70 %) without significant increasing Cmax. The mechanism study revealed that forming ion-pairs effectively modulated drug’s physicochemical properties and doubly ionic H-bond strength to improve drug miscibility in patches. To summarize, a sustained-release patch of PAL was successfully developed, which provided a strategy for sustained-release patches with good drug-polymer miscibility, drug controlled-release, and feasible drug utilization features.

In brief: Erzofri - another once-monthly paliperidone formulation.

The FDA has approved Erzofri (Luye), an extended-release injectable formulation of the second-generation antipsychotic drug paliperidone palmitate, for treatment of schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder in adults. It is the second once-monthly formulation of paliperidone palmitate to be approved in the US for these indications; Invega Sustenna was the first. Longer-acting injectable formulations of paliperidone palmitate are also available.

Health-Care Utilisation and Costs of Transition from Paliperidone Palmitate 1-Monthly to 3-Monthly Treatment for Schizophrenia: A Real-World, Retrospective, 24-Month Mirror-Image Study.

Poor adherence to antipsychotics in patients with schizophrenia is a leading cause of relapse and functional deterioration. Long-acting injectable paliperidone may reduce relapse risks, health-care utilisation, and health-care costs in these patients. In this 24-month mirror-image study, we compared health-care utilization and costs before and after the initiation of paliperidone palmitate 3-monthly (PP3M) treatment in patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders. Before the initiation of PP3M, the patients received paliperidone 1-monthly (PP1M) treatment. The primary study outcomes were changes in health-care utilisation and costs over the study period. This study included 34 patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders. During the 12-months period after the initiation of PP3M treatment, the mean duration of hospitalisation decreased from 57.7 to 28.5 days (p = 0.03). Moreover, significant reductions were noted in emergency room visits (PP1M vs PP3M: 0.3 vs 0.0, respectively; p = 0.05) and health-care costs (PP1M vs PP3M: 107,328.8 vs 57,848.6, respectively; p = 0.03). PP3M may significantly reduce hospitalisation duration, emergency room visits, and health-care costs in patients with schizophrenia.

Clinical effectiveness of paliperidone palmitate 3-monthly and 1-monthly as monotherapy in patients with schizophrenia: A retrospective cohort study based on the Medicaid claims database.

Real-world data (RWD) for paliperidone palmitate (PP) three-monthly (PP3M) is lacking based on Japan label requirements. This study evaluated the clinical effectiveness of PP3M versus PP once-monthly (PP1M) in patients with schizophrenia administered according to Japan label requirements. Retrospective analyses were conducted using RWD from Merative™ MarketScan® Multi-State Medicaid (MDCD) claims database (June 2015-December 2022). Adult patients with schizophrenia switching from PP1M to PP3M were included. Patients transitioning to PP3M were matched with patients who continued with PP1M using propensity score matching (PSM) at 1:1 ratio. Primary hypothesis aimed to investigate non-inferiority of PP3M versus PP1M in terms of relapse-free status at 24 months from index PP injection. Outcome measures were proportions of relapse-free patients at 24 months, time to relapse, treatment persistence, and adherence. Total 4252 eligible adult schizophrenia patients on PP (PP3M:582; PP1M:3670) were identified. After PSM, each PP cohort comprised 562 matched individuals. Estimated proportion of relapse-free patients was higher in PP3M (85.7%) versus PP1M (77.9%), per Japan PP label. PP3M demonstrated superiority to PP1M after testing for non-inferiority in terms of achieving relapse-free status at 24 months, with an estimated difference of 7.8% (95% CI: 1.7%-13.9%). PP3M cohort had lower risk of relapse (HR: 0.605; CI: 0.427-0.856), longer treatment persistence, and higher treatment adherence versus PP1M cohort. Findings suggests that patients who switched to PP3M might be able to reduce risk of relapse compared to those who continued PP1M after aligning particularly with Japan's label requirements.

Healthcare utilization and economics evaluation of paliperidone palmitate once-monthly in schizophrenia: a one-year, real-world, and retrospective mirror image study in China.

Investigation and analysis of the changes in healthcare resources and burden of schizophrenia in the real world before and after switching from oral antipsychotics (OAPs) to paliperidone palmitate once-monthly (PP1M) could provide evidence to clinicians and patients for choosing treatment modality and data support for health policy optimization. The first dosage of PP1M was set as mirror point, and patients with mirror point between January 2020 and June 2022 were recruited in the study. The differences in treatment patterns, healthcare resource utilization, and costs within one year before and after the mirror point were compared. A total of 72 patients transitioning from OAPs to PP1M (mean age, 35.33 years; 43.06% female) were included in the study. Of the 72 patients, the application of PP1M resulted in a significant reduction in the hospitalization times, emergency room visits, and direct medical costs (P < 0.001), while the pharmacy cost and total cost increased by 222.57% (P < 0.001) and 16.35% (P < 0.001), respectively; PP1M accounted for 88.48% of the pharmacy cost. For patients with ≥1 hospitalization during the OAPs phase (n = 25), the number of hospitalizations, hospitalization days and hospitalization expenses decreased by more than 90% (P < 0.001). Total one-year expenses decreased by 37.67% (P < 0.001), and pharmacy expenses increased by 185.21% (P < 0.001). For patients with no hospitalizations during the OAPs phase (n = 47), emergency and outpatient visits decreased by 70% (P < 0.001) and 30.27% (P < 0.05), respectively, while the total cost increased by 117.56% (P < 0.001), and the pharmacy cost increased by 260.15% (P < 0.001) after initiation of PP1M treatment. After the transition to PP1M, the number of hospitalizations and outpatient and emergency department visits reduced, and healthcare resources were conserved. Switching to PP1M may be more economically beneficial for patients with prior hospitalizations while on OAP regimens. The high price of PP1M might be an obstacle to its widespread use.

Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotic Initiation in Child and Adolescent Patients with Psychiatric Disorders.

Objectives: There are currently no long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIAs) that are approved by the Food and Drug Administration for use in child and adolescent patients, however these agents are used off-label for the treatment of various psychiatric disorders. This study aims to describe the initiation and maintenance dosing strategies of LAIAs in child and adolescent psychiatry inpatients. Methods: This was a single-site retrospective chart review of patients less than 18 years of age initiated on an LAIA during an acute psychiatric hospitalization between October 1, 2015, and October 31, 2022. Patient demographics and hospital encounter information were collected and analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results: Of the 6402 unique pediatric patients discharged from the acute psychiatric hospital within the specified timeframe, 45 (0.7%) were newly initiated on an LAIA. The average age was 15.6 years (range 10-17), with a greater proportion of male (n = 26, 57.8%) and Black or African American (n = 27, 60%) patients. The LAIA agents prescribed included paliperidone palmitate (n = 21, 46.7%), aripiprazole monohydrate (n = 15, 33.3%), aripiprazole lauroxil (n = 7, 15.6%), haloperidol decanoate (n = 1, 2.2%), and risperidone microspheres (n = 1, 2.2%). Primary diagnosis via International Classification of Diseases-10 code at discharge included schizophrenia spectrum and other psychotic disorders (n = 19, 42.2%); bipolar disorder (n = 14, 31.1%); disruptive, impulse control, and conduct disorders (n = 6, 13.3%); autistic disorder (n = 5, 11.1%); and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (n = 1, 2.2%). Seventeen patients (37.8%) received a loading dose regimen and/or a maintenance dose regimen that differed from adult package-insert dosing. The mean length of stay was 23.7 days, and 14 patients (31.1%) were readmitted to the psychiatric hospital within 6 months of discharge. The mean number of days to readmission was 71.9 days. Conclusions: This retrospective study is the first to focus on LAIA initiation and maintenance dosing strategies of multiple agents in both a child and adolescent patient population. Further research is required to evaluate the impact of LAIAs on clinical outcomes in this patient population.

A Bayesian framework for virtual comparative trials and bioequivalence assessments.

In virtual bioequivalence (VBE) assessments, pharmacokinetic models informed with in vitro data and verified with small clinical trials' data are used to simulate otherwise unfeasibly large trials. Simulated VBE trials are assessed in a frequentist framework as if they were real despite the unlimited number of virtual subjects they can use. This may adequately control consumer risk but imposes unnecessary risks on producers. We propose a fully Bayesian model-integrated VBE assessment framework that circumvents these limitations. We illustrate our approach with a case study on a hypothetical paliperidone palmitate (PP) generic long-acting injectable suspension formulation using a validated population pharmacokinetic model published for the reference formulation. BE testing, study power, type I and type II error analyses or their Bayesian equivalents, and safe-space analyses are demonstrated. The fully Bayesian workflow is more precise than the frequentist workflow. Decisions about bioequivalence and safe space analyses in the two workflows can differ markedly because the Bayesian analyses are more accurate. A Bayesian framework can adequately control consumer risk and minimize producer risk . It rewards data gathering and model integration to make the best use of prior information. The frequentist approach is less precise but faster to compute, and it can still be used as a first step to narrow down the parameter space to explore in safe-space analyses.

Three-Year Outcomes of 6-Month Paliperidone Palmitate in Adults With Schizophrenia

Long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotics have the potential to improve adherence and symptom control in patients with schizophrenia, promoting long-term recovery. Paliperidone palmitate (PP) once every 6 months is the first and currently only LAI antipsychotic with an extended dosing interval of 6 months. To assess long-term outcomes of PP received once every 6 months in adults with schizophrenia. In a 2-year open-label extension (OLE) study of a 1-year randomized clinical trial (RCT), eligible adults with schizophrenia could choose to continue PP every 6 months if they had not experienced relapse after receiving PP once every 3 or 6 months in the 1-year, international, multicenter, double-blind, randomized noninferiority trial. The present analysis focused on patients receiving PP every 6 months in the double-blind trial through the OLE study (November 20, 2017, to May 3, 2022). Patients received a dorsogluteal injection of PP on day 1 and once every 6 months up to month 30. End points included assessment of relapse and change from the double-blind trial baseline to the OLE end point in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total and subscale, Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Scale, and Personal Social Performance (PSP) Scale scores. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), injection site evaluations, and laboratory tests were also assessed. Among 121 patients (83 [68.6%] male), mean (SD) age at baseline was 38.6 (11.24) years and mean (SD) duration of illness was 11.0 (9.45) years. At screening of the double-blind study, 101 patients (83.5%) were taking an oral antipsychotic and 20 (16.5%) were taking an LAI antipsychotic. Altogether, 5 of 121 patients (4.1%) experienced relapse during the 3-year follow-up; reasons for relapse were psychiatric hospitalization (2 [1.7%]), suicidal or homicidal ideation (2 [1.7%]), and deliberate self-injury (1 [0.8%]). Patients treated with PP every 6 months were clinically and functionally stable, and outcomes were well maintained, evidenced by stable scores on the PANSS (mean [SD] change, -2.6 [9.96] points), CGI-S (mean [SD] change, -0.2 [0.57] points), and PSP (mean [SD] change, 3.1 [9.14] points) scales over the 3-year period. In total, 101 patients (83.5%) completed the 2-year OLE. At least 1 TEAE was reported in 97 of 121 patients (80.2%) overall; no new safety or tolerability concerns were identified. In a 2-year OLE study of a 1-year RCT, results supported favorable long-term outcomes of PP once every 6 months for up to 3 years in adults with schizophrenia.

Adis summary of research: A 10-year observational study of the use, acceptability and effectiveness of long-acting paliperidone palmitate: implications for clinical decision making

Adis summary of research: A 10-year observational study of the use, acceptability and effectiveness of long-acting paliperidone palmitate: implications for clinical decision making

Health economics study of paliperidone palmitate in the treatment of schizophrenia: a 12-month cohort study

BackgroundTo analyze the economic benefits of paliperidone palmitate in the treatment of schizophrenia.MethodsWe collected 546 patients who met the diagnostic criteria for schizophrenia according to the 《International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems,10th》(ICD-10). We gathered general population data such as gender, age, marital status, and education level, then initiated treatment with paliperidone palmitate. Then Follow-up evaluations were conducted at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after the start of treatment to assess clinical efficacy, adverse reactions, and injection doses. We also collected information on the economic burden before and after 12 months of treatment, as well as the number of outpatient visits and hospitalizations in the past year to analyze economic benefits.ResultsThe baseline patients totaled 546, with 239 still receiving treatment with paliperidone palmitate 12 months later. After 12 months of treatment, the number of outpatient visits per year increased compared to before (4 (2,10) vs. 12 (4,12), Z=-5.949, P < 0.001), while the number of hospitalizations decreased (1 (1,3) vs. 1 (1,2), Z = 5.625, P < 0.001). The inpatient costs in the direct medical expenses of patients after 12 months of treatment decreased compared to before (5000(2000,12000) vs. 3000 (1000,8050), P < 0.05), while there was no significant change in outpatient expenses and direct non-medical expenses (transportation, accommodation, meal, and family accompanying expenses, etc.) (P > 0.05); the indirect costs of patients after 12 months of treatment (lost productivity costs for patients and families, economic costs due to destructive behavior, costs of seeking non-medical assistance) decreased compared to before (300(150,600) vs. 150(100,200), P < 0.05).ConclusionPalmatine palmitate reduces the number of hospitalizations for patients, as well as their direct and indirect economic burdens, and has good economic benefits.

Neutropenia Following Use of Haloperidol and Paliperidone Palmitate

Neutropenia Following Use of Haloperidol and Paliperidone Palmitate

Treatment patterns and hospitalizations following rejection, reversal, or payment of the initial once-monthly paliperidone palmitate long-acting injectable antipsychotic claim among patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder.

Once-monthly paliperidone palmitate (PP1M) is a long-acting injectable antipsychotic approved for the treatment of schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder (SCA) in adults. To assess treatment patterns and schizophrenia/SCA-related hospitalization following payer rejection, patient reversal, or payment of an initial PP1M claim. This was a retrospective cohort study using the IQVIA Formulary Impact Analyzer database linked to the Medical Claims, Hospital Charge Detail Master, and Experian consumer databases. Patients with schizophrenia/SCA and ≥1 PP1M pharmacy claim from January 1, 2018, to February 28, 2022, were identified and stratified into 3 cohorts based on the transaction status of the initial PP1M claim (index date): rejected (payer not approved), reversed (payer approved, patient abandoned), and paid (payer approved, patient filled). Patient characteristics during the 12 months before the index date, subsequent treatment patterns, and schizophrenia/SCA-related hospitalization for patients with >6 months of follow-up were assessed by cohort. The rejected, reversed, and paid cohorts included 1,260, 1,046, and 1,686 patients, respectively. Across these cohorts, the mean ages ranged between 39.2 and 44.5 years; more than half were male (50.8%-51.6%) and White (50.6%-58.3%); 19.8%-24.6% of patients had a Quan-Charlson Comorbidity Index score of ≥2. Rates of prior atypical oral and long-acting injectable antipsychotic use ranged between 76.4%-80.3% and 7.8%-12.7%, respectively. Among patients with ≥6 months of follow-up, 52.2% in the rejected and 53.1% in the reversed cohorts had a subsequent paid PP1M claim during the study period; the median (quartile 1-quartile 3) time to the first paid PP1M claim was 22 (5-74) days for rejection and 11 (1-41) days for reversal. In the rejected and reversed cohorts, 10.2% (n = 111) and 9.8% (n = 90) of patients, respectively, did not receive any paid claim for an antipsychotic after the initial PP1M rejection/reversal. The prevalence of schizophrenia/SCA-related hospitalization during follow-up was similar between patients with a paid (7.4%) and rejected PP1M claim (7.0%; P = 0.689) but higher among patients with a reversed claim (10.8%; P = 0.004). After adjusting for confounders, patients in the reversed cohort were 39% more likely to have a schizophrenia/SCA-related hospitalization than those in the paid cohort (odds ratio = 1.39; 95% CI = 1.03-1.87). Payer rejection and patient reversal of initial PP1M claims is a form of primary nonadherence and may influence patient trajectory. Data from this study suggest that patient reversal of PP1M may lead to an increased risk of schizophrenia/SCA-related hospitalizations, potentially caused by missed or delayed treatment. Policy initiatives that remove barriers to primary adherence or fulfillment may help improve patients' clinical outcomes.

D-Optimal Mixture Design Enabled Development of Lyophilized Nanoemulsifying Drug Delivery System of Paliperidone

Background: Schizophrenia is a chronic disease with acute psychotic symptoms, which is having frequent recurrence. Paliperidone palmitate (PP) is a second-generation antipsy-chotic drug to treat schizophrenia. Aims: The aim of the study was to prepare lyophilized nanoemulsifying drug delivery system (NEDDS) of paliperidone (PD). Objective: The primary objective of the current research work was to develop a lyophilized nanoemulsifying drug delivery system (NEDDS) of paliperidone (PD) to improve its oral bioa-vailability and stability. Methods: Optimization using D-Optimal Mixture Design DMD) was conducted, and optimized NEDDS was further lyophilized to improve stability. The lyophilized optimized NEDDS was fur-ther evaluated for biopharmaceutical evaluation. Result: A saturation solubility study revealed Peceol, Tween 80, and Plurol Olique CC497 as suitable candidates for oil, surfactant, and co-surfactant, respectively. Optimized NEDDS of PD showed mean globule size (MGS) of 185 nm, PDI of 0.27 and cumulative % drug release within 15 min Q15 of 86.6%. Lyophilized optimized NEDDS was found to have no significant change in quality attributes within the stability study period. A pharmacokinetic study revealed more than two-fold increases in bioavailability for lyophilized optimized NEDDS. Conclusion: Hence, lyophilized NEDDS of PD can be used as an effective approach for the im-provement of oral bioavailability and stability.

Model-Informed Clinical Development of 6-Monthly Injection of Paliperidone Palmitate in Patients with Schizophrenia: Dosing Strategies Guided by Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling and Simulation (Part II).

Paliperidone palmitate 6-month (PP6M) intramuscular (IM) injection is the longest-acting treatment available for patients with schizophrenia. A population pharmacokinetic (popPK) modeling and simulation approach was deployed to inform dosing strategies for PP6M. The extensive analysis database included 15,932 paliperidone samples from 700 patients receiving gluteal paliperidone palmitate 3-month (PP3M) or PP6M injections in the double-blind phase of a phase-3 noninferiority study (NCT03345342). Exposure parameters for paliperidone appeared to increase dose-proportionally within each dosing schedule (PP3M/PP6M). The range of paliperidone exposures after IM administration of PP6M overlaps with that of corresponding doses of oral paliperidone extended release, PP 1-month (PP1M), and PP3M. Model-based simulations were performed to investigate paliperidone exposures in different PP6M dosing scenarios and relevant subpopulations. A dosing window of ≤ 2 weeks earlier and ≤ 3 weeks later than the target 6-month interval for maintenance treatment with PP6M dosing maintains paliperidone exposures at levels that are not expected to substantially impact its safety and efficacy. For missed-dose scenarios, tailored re-initiation regimens are proposed that should be applied before resuming PP6M maintenance dosing. Regarding subpopulations, PP6M 700 mg eq. is the highest dose recommended in mild renal-impairment patients; the paliperidone pharmacokinetics after PP6M administration is not affected by sex, body mass index, or age in a clinically meaningful way. Paliperidone concentration-time profiles after PP6M and PP3M dosing were adequately described by the popPK model. Model-based simulation results provide guidance for clinicians on initiating PP6M therapy, transitioning between paliperidone formulations, the dosing windows to use for maintenance dosing, and managing missed PP6M doses.

Model-Informed Clinical Development of Once-Every-6-Month Injection of Paliperidone Palmitate in Patients with Schizophrenia: A Pharmacometric Bridging Approach (Part I).

A model-informed drug development (MIDD) approach was implemented for paliperidone palmitate (PP) 6-month (PP6M) clinical development, using pharmacokinetics and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model-based simulations. PP6M pharmacokinetics were simulated by extending the PP 3-month (PP3M) pharmacokinetic model to account for increased injection volume, and hence dose. Contribution of the MIDD approach to the design of the pivotal PP6M phase-3 study (PP6M/PP3M noninferiority study, NCT03345342) investigating schizophrenia relapse rates was twofold: (1) PP6M dose selection, and (2) hypothesis generation that lower trough concentrations (Ctrough) associated with PP6M, relative to PP3M, were not associated with lower efficacy, which was to be evaluated in the phase-3 study. Moreover, accompanied by an intense sampling scheme to adequately characterize paliperidone pharmacokinetics and to elucidate the potential relationship between concentration and safety/efficacy, the bridging strategy eliminated the need for additional phase-1/phase-2 clinical studies. Using a MIDD bridging strategy, PP6M doses were selected that, compared with PP3M, were expected to have a similar range of exposures and a noninferior relapse rate and safety profile. Clinical data from PP6M/PP3M noninferiority study confirmed that PP6M, compared with PP3M, had a similar range of exposures (T'jollyn etal. in Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet 2024), as well as a noninferior relapse rate and safety profile (this manuscript). Consistency of the MIDD approach with observed clinical outcomes confirmed the hypothesis that lower Ctrough did not lead to increased relapse rates at the doses administered. Although higher paliperidone peak concentrations are achieved with corresponding doses of PP6M relative to PP3M in the phase-3 clinical study, types and incidences of treatment-related adverse events were comparable between PP6M and PP3M groups and no new safety concerns emerged for PP6M (Najarian etal. in Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 25(3):238-251, 2022).

Safety and Efficacy of Paliperidone Palmitate in Pediatric Patients with Autism and Intellectual Disability.

This retrospective chart review examines the safety, tolerability and effectiveness of long acting injectable paliperidone palmitate (P-LAI) targeting irritability in twenty-six youth and transition-aged individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and/or intellectual disability (ID) over a 3-year window. Clinical response was evaluated via prospectively assigned Clinical Global Impressions Severity (CGI-S) and Improvement (CGI-I) scales as well as number of hospital presentations. P-LAI was well tolerated with only 3 patients stopping P-LAI due to side effects. The average duration of P-LAI treatment was 21.1months. Difficulty with medication compliance was the most common reason for initiating P-LAI. There was a statistically significant improvement in CGI-I, CGI-S and hospital visits and no change in BMI noted. Given the potential difficulty of medication administration in this population, this evidence of safety, tolerability as well as preliminary data supporting effectiveness is an important addition to the literature regarding psychopharmacologic management of irritability in youth with ASD and ID.

Combination of Two Long-Acting Antipsychotics in Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders: A Systematic Review.

Up to 34% of patients with schizophrenia are resistant to several treatment trials. Lack of continuous and adequate treatment is associated with relapse, rehospitalization, a lower effect of antipsychotic therapy, and higher risk of side effects. Long-acting injectables antipsychotics (LAI APs) enhance compliance and improve clinical outcomes and quality of life in patients with schizophrenia, and thus it may be advisable to administer two LAI APs at the same time in cases of treatment-resistant schizophrenia. The purpose of this review is to summarize the available literature regarding the combined use of two LAI APs in patients with schizophrenia or other psychotic spectrum disorders. An extensive literature search for relevant articles regarding any combination of two long-acting injectable antipsychotics has been performed from inception up to 9 February 2024, on PubMed, Scopus and APA PsycInfo, according to the PRISMA statement. Only studies reporting combination of two LAI APs and its clinical outcome in patients with schizophrenia and related disorders were selected. After the selection process, nine case reports, four case series and two observational retrospective studies were included in the final analysis. All patients treated with dual LAI APs reported a good response, and no new or unexpected adverse effects due to the combination of two LAIs were reported. Different drug combinations were used, and the most frequent association resulted in aripiprazole monohydrate + paliperidone palmitate once monthly (32 times). Our review highlights that the treatment regimen with two concurrent LAI APs is already widely used in clinical practice and is recognized as providing a promising, effective, and relatively safe therapeutic strategy for treating the schizophrenia spectrum disorders.

Optimizing Treatment of Schizophrenia: Clinical and Economical Potential for Patient Switching to Long‑Acting Injectables

INTRODUCTION: Long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs), due to a lower frequency of administration, could address the well-established challenge of non-adherence to oral ones. We conducted a Network Meta-Analysis (NMA) to assess the relationship between administration frequency and effectiveness. The recent introduction of a semi-annual paliperidone palmitate formulation, along with the arrival of monthly paliperidone generics, could emphasize LAI’s advantages. Aim of this paper is to present the results derived from an updated version of our previous NMA. These results are used to fuel a budget impact model built to evaluate the economic implications of optimizing dosing intervals.METHODS: We compare the current distribution of patients among available LAI active substances and dosing frequencies with an optimized scenario. In this scenario, 20% of patients are switched to the next permitted regimen with a longer inter-dosing interval. Drug acquisition costs and relapse management costs are taken into account over a one-year simulation period; these last items are estimated by means of the event rates obtained from the updated meta-analysis. The optimized scenario incorporates the reduced cost resulting from the expiration of patents.RESULTS: Throughout the analysis, a total of 11,600 patients were able to switch from shorter to longer dosing intervals, leading to an overall optimization of quality of care. The greater expenditure incurred by the Italian National Health Service (NHS) in the acquisition of newer and longer-lasting drugs is offset by savings associated with the arrival of generics of monthly paliperidone palmitate and the shift toward less-relapsing regimens. The net impact on the NHS budget is a saving of more than 19 million Euros.CONCLUSION: This economic saving has the potential to initiate a virtuous process: it could be reinvested to fund a further shift from oral daily therapies, which are less expensive but marked by poor compliance, to LAIs. According to our simulation, nearly 40 thousand patients could undergo this transition, without additional expenses for the NHS.

Risk of Cardiovascular Events in Schizophrenic Patients Treated with Paliperidone Palmitate Once-Monthly Injection (PP1M): A Population-Based Retrospective Cohort Study in Taiwan.

Schizophrenia is one of the leading causes of disability. Paliperidone palmitate once-monthly injection (PP1M) was developed to provide consistent drug delivery and improve medication adherence for maintenance treatment. It is well known that patients with schizophrenia have higher cardiovascular risks, however little is known about the cardiovascular risks of patients with schizophrenia treated with PP1M in Asia. This study aimed to estimate the incidence of cardiovascular events after initiating PP1M treatment and evaluate the cardiovascular risk associations compared with oral second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs). Data from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database were used to identify a cohort of adult patients with schizophrenia who received any SGAs from 1 March 2012 to 31 December 2018. Patients who initiated PP1M treatment were enrolled for descriptive analysis of incidence rates. PP1M patients were propensity matched 1:1 to patients initiating a new oral SGA, for comparative analysis based on demographics, clinical characteristics and treatment history at baseline, in three-step matching procedures, following the prevalent new-user design to enhance comparability. Follow-up ended at the end of the treatment episode of index drug, death, last record available, or end of the study (31 December 2019). Study endpoints included serious cardiovascular events (including severe ventricular arrhythmia and sudden death), expanded serious cardiovascular events (which further included acute myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke), and cardiovascular hospitalizations. Risks of study endpoints between matched cohorts were compared using Cox regression. Overall, 11,023 patients initiating PP1M treatment were identified (49.5% were females; mean age of 43.2 [12.2] years). Overall incidences for serious cardiovascular events, expanded serious cardiovascular events, and cardiovascular hospitalizations were 3.92, 7.88 and 51.96 per 1000 person-years, respectively. In matched cohort analysis (N=10,115), the hazard ratios (HRs) between initiating PP1M and a new oral SGA for serious cardiovascular events, expanded serious cardiovascular events, and cardiovascular hospitalizations were 0.86 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.55-1.36), 0.88 (95% CI 0.63-1.21), and 0.78 (95% CI 0.69-0.89), respectively. This study reported the population-based incidence of cardiovascular events in schizophrenic patients initiating PP1M treatment. PP1M was not associated with increased risks of serious cardiovascular events but was potentially associated with lower risks of cardiovascular hospitalizations compared with oral SGAs.

Descriptive study of 100 patients with a diagnosis of psychosis treated with Paliperidone Palmitate 6-Month Long-Acting Injectable.

IntroductionPsychotic disorders are serious mental illnesses that require long-term antipsychotic treatment that provides sufficient efficacy, safety and therapeutic adherence. The latter is an essential factor that must be emphasized in clinical practice in order to avoid relapses. On this occasion, we have the need to know the long-term impact on our clinical practice and on the evolution of patients after the change in formulation of paliperidone palmitate 1 (PP1M) and 3 Month long-acting injectable antipsychotic (PP3M) to paliperidone palmitate 6 Month (PP6M).ObjectivesThe present study describes a sample of patients with severe mental disorders (n= 100) treated with six-monthly paliperidone palmitate (PP6M) studying the diagnoses, socio-demographic characteristics, number of relapses, tolerability and treatment adherence of patients.MethodsProspective descriptive study with a sample selected by non-probabilistic consecutive sampling, retrospective type, in a time interval of 15 month (n= 100 outpatients). The patients selected were all those who received 6 monthly paliperidone palmitate treatment from May 2022 to September 2023. A descriptive analysis was performed. Mean and standard deviation were calculated for quantitative variables and N and percentage for categorical variables.ResultsProspective study with consecutive sampling of 100 outpatients (62% men, 38% women; mean age 48 years) diagnosed with psychosis (76 % Schizophrenia, 21 % Unspecified psychosis, 3 % Delusional disorder) those who are administered PP6M long-acting injectable antipsychotic previously treated with PP1M (35%) and PP3M (65%).After 15 months of the study, 4 patients (4%) have suffered a relapse, one of them (1%) requiring hospitalization. 5 patients (4%) declined to continue PP6M and have returned to their previous injectable. 1 patient (1%) has died of unknown causes outside the treatment. 90 patients continue treatment with PP6M (90% retention rate). 54 patients maintain antipsychotic monotherapy (54%). No additional adverse effects were reported after switching to PP6M. The subjective perception of satisfaction after the switch to PP6M by patients and caregivers was very high.ConclusionsThe present real clinical practice study shows that PP6M could be an effective and well tolerated treatment in patients with severe mental disorder, for patients diagnosed with psychosis, with a high rate of relapse prevention and high rates of compliance. Changing treatment from PP1M or PP3M to PP6M could help patients with severe mental disorder to normalize their lives and functionality.Disclosure of InterestNone Declared