Charles Darwin, the English naturalist and father of evolutionary theory, was the first scientist to have dealt with fossils from the Santa Cruz Formation of Argentine Patagonia. However, our understanding of the history of the early Miocene continental vertebrates from Santa Cruz Province is closely tied to two sustained collaborative efforts separated by more than a century. The first occurred near the end of the 19th century between two pioneering giants of Argentine paleontology, the Ameghino brothers, Florentino the biologist and Carlos the geologist; and the second has been unfolding over the last decade and a half between colleagues from Duke University (USA) and the Museo de La Plata (Argentina). In addition, the contributions made near the end of the 19 and early part of the 20 centuries by the Princeton University paleontologists J.B. Hatcher in the field and W.B. Scott through comprehensive monographs on fossil vertebrates, form an important intermediate step between the work of the Ameghinos and the Duke University-Museo de La Plata collaboration. The fauna represented by the diverse, abundant, and generally very well-preserved remains of vertebrate mammals recovered from the Santa Cruz is the basis of the early Miocene Santacrucian South American Land Mammal Age (ca. 19–14 Mya). The forests and grasslands present in this area during this period supported the presence of extinct and surviving lineages of mammals, reptiles, and birds. Thus, Sergio F. Vizcaino and M. Susana Bargo, specialists in the paleobiology of South American mammals, and Richard F. Kay, a specialist in South American fossil primates, undertook to spearhead a long-term program that follows and expands upon the trail of Carlos Ameghino in search of Santacrucian fossils under difficult conditions. Their efforts involved the collaboration of numerous international scientists and graduate students, as well as additional staff, from several institutions. Their results have so far included recovery of some 1600 new specimens, including several nearly complete vertebrate skeletons, mainly from the beach deposits of Santa Cruz Province between the Rios Coyle and Gallegos. This wealth of new remains, combined with precise stratigraphic control, has allowed both the revision of numerous taxa based initially on (often) less well-preserved remains of older collections, as well as the opportunity to conduct rigorous paleobiological analyses, including but not limited to ecological interactions and paleoenvironmental conditions. It is this latter discipline that is the main focus of the contribution under review, which probably represents the first overarching, comprehensive, and broad-based set of paleobiological analyses for South American mammals. There is great uniformity among the paleobiological chapters, which results in a high degree of balanced coverage among the different groups treated. This is clearly intentional and the editors are to be commended for implementing a protocol and seeing to it that it was followed. This is a main strength of this book and is, in large part, what distinguishes it from many other texts on paleobiology. This multi-authored book comprises a detailed study involving 43 paleontologists, both students and established researchers, including anthropologists, biologists, and geologists from Argentina and the USA a wonderful example of scientific and international cooperation. From the outset, it is F. Pujos Instituto Argentino de Nivologia Glaciologia y Ciencias Ambientales (IANIGLA), CCT-CONICET-Mendoza, Avda.Ruiz Leal s/n, Parque Gral. San Martin, Mendoza 5500, Argentina