Palatally Displaced Canines Research Articles

Evaluation of Cone Beam Computerized Tomography: Effects of Maxillary Bones and Their Influence on the Point of Next Teeth and Canine Development.

In this study, individuals with unilateral palatally shifted canines had cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) image palatally displaced canine (PDC) and non-PDC sides investigate the anatomy of their upper teeth adopting a "surface matching" approach. The CBCT scans of an overall of 28 people with unilateral PDC were chosen. Every single tooth in research was broken down and turned into a three-dimensional structure utilizing identical research programs, which made it possible to quantify the total length of the tooth root. Assessing the lateral incisor (LI) roots quantities and widths of the control category, non-PDC side, and PDC sides revealed statistically significant variations (P < 0.001). Compared to contra-lateral LIs, LIs next to PDCs possess small roots. In addition, patients with unilateral PDCs had structural abnormalities between their canines and LIs.

“Examining the link between tooth agenesis and papillary thyroid cancer: is there a risk factor?” Observational study

BackgroundMutations in one or multiple genes can lead to hypodontia and its characteristic features. Numerous studies have shown a strong genetic influence on the occurrence of hypodontia, and identified several genes, including AXIN2, EDA, FGF3, FGFR2, FGFR10, WNT10A, MSX1, and PAX9, that are directly associated with dental agenesis and carcinogenesis. The objective of this study was to investigate the occurrence and pattern of tooth agenesis, microdontia, and palatally displaced canine (PDC) in women diagnosed with papillary thyroid cancer (PTC), compared to a control group of women without any malignancy or thyroid disease.Materials and methodsThis case–control study was carried at the Department of Orthodontics, School of Dental Medicine University of Zagreb, and Department of Oncology and Nuclear Medicine Sestre Milosrdnice University Hospital Centre. The study involved a clinical examination and evaluation of dental status, panoramic X-ray analysis, and assessment of medical and family history of 116 female patients aged 20–40 with PTC, as well as 424 females in the control group who were of similar age.ResultsThe prevalence of hypodontia, microdontia, and PDC was statistically higher in women with PTC than in the control group. The prevalence rate of hypodontia was 11.3% in the experimental group and 3.5% in the control group. The experimental group showed a higher occurrence of missing upper lateral incisors, lower left central incisors, and all the third molars (except the upper left) compared to the control group. Women with PTC showed the prevalence of PDC significantly higher than the control group (3.5%, 0.7%, p = 0.002). The probability of hypodontia as a clinical finding increases 2.6 times, and microdontia occurs 7.7 times more frequently in women with PTC.ConclusionOur study suggests a possible link between odontogenesis and PTC. The absence of permanent teeth may increase the likelihood of PTC in women. Leveraging the age-7 orthopantomogram to identify women at high risk for PTC within a critical early detection window could significantly improve oral health outcomes and PTC prognosis through proactive interventions.

Evaluation of nasal septal deviation and maxillary bone and nasal airway dimensions and volumes using cone-beam computed tomography in patients with unilateral palatal canine displacement: a retrospective study.

To detect any association between palatally displaced canine (PDC) and nasal septal deviation (NSD), palatal bone thickness and volume, and nasal airway dimensions and volume. A total of 92 patients were included and subdivided into two groups: group 1, unilateral PDCs (44 patients), and group 2, normally erupted canines (NDCs) (48 subjects). The following variables were measured using cone-beam computed tomography: presence and type of NSD, nasal width, inferior conchae, hard palate and nasal septum thickness, maxillary bone and nasal airway volumes. NSD was detected in 77% and 50% of PDC and NDC subjects, respectively. Within the PDC subjects, significant differences between the displaced and nondisplaced sides were detected. Palate thickness was increased in the canine region and reduced in the molar region. Compared with the control group, PDC subjects had reduced palate thickness and lower nasal airway volume. Two predictors were significant for predicting the odds of PDC occurrence: NSD and maxillary bone volume. NSD is more frequent in PDC subjects. PDC subjects have reduced palate thickness and decreased nasal airway volume. In the presence of NSD, the odds of developing PDC increase by 3.35 times, and for each one-unit increase in the maxillary bone volume, the odds of developing PDC decrease by 20%.

Statistical shape analysis of maxillary palatal morphology in patients with palatally displaced canines

ObjectiveMaxillary morphology has long been a subject of interest due to its possible impact on palatally and labially displaced canines. This study aims to conduct a comparison of the palate morphology between individuals with palatal and labially displaced canines and control subjects using statistical shape analysis on a coronal cross-sectional of CBCT images.Materials and methodsPatients aged between 12 and 43 years with palatally or labially displaced canines referred to Hamadan School of Dentistry between 2014 and 2019 were recruited for this retrospective study. The sample included 29 palatally displaced canines (PDC), 20 labially displaced canines (LDC), and 20 control groups (CG). Initially, the maxillary palate coronal section was acquired and landmarked in the region between the right and the left first molar. Procrustes and principal component analyses were used to identify the primary patterns of palatal shape variation. Statistical tests were then performed to examine both shape and size differences.ResultsAccording to the results of Hotelling’s T2 test, there is a significant difference between the mean shape of palate in PDC and CG (P = 0.009), while the difference between the PDC-LDC and LDC-CG groups is not significant. The longest full Procrustes distance was observed between PDC and CG (distance = 0.043), and the shortest full Procrustes distance was observed between LDC and CG (distance = 0.029). The first two principal components accounted for 84.47% of the total variance. The predictive accuracy of the discriminant analysis model showed that 72.46% of cases were correctly classified into the three study groups.ConclusionsIn terms of centroid size, there was no significant difference in the sectional area between the three groups, but the difference between the mean shape of palate in the PDC and CG groups was significant. The PDC group showed more prominent mid-palatal area in the molar region.

Computer-guided surgical exposure of palatally displaced canines: a technical note.

To present a minimally invasive approach to expose palatally displaced canines (PDCs) using a surgical guide. Surgical guides for palatal canine exposure are fabricated with CAD/CAM technology. With adequate software, it is possible to match the STL files of the dental arch with the DICOM images of the maxilla. On the STL 3D model file, the operator can localize and determine the exact position of the impacted canine. In turn, this allows the identification of the ideal location of the window. A software application facilitates the design of the surgical guide, which is printed using a 3D printer. Exposure of PDCs can be achieved satisfactorily using surgical guides. The use of computer-guided surgical exposure of PDCs allows both the reduction of surgical time and surgical invasiveness, minimizing patients' postoperative discomfort. Controlled clinical trials are necessary to evaluate more fully any advantages of this minimally invasive technique.

Maxillary dimensions and arch shape with palatally displaced canines.

The aim of this study was to explore the effect of palatally displaced canines on maxillary dimensions and arch shape. Occlusal and skeletal landmarks were plotted on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images of 156 orthodontic patients: 78 with palatally displaced canines (PDC) (27 left, 28 right, and 23 bilateral) and 78 controls using Mimics™ (Materialise, Belgium). Arch forms were created, and arch width, depth, and skeletal dimensions were measured. T-test (P < 0.05) was used to compare the groups. Geometric Morphometrics (GM) analysis was used to compare the groups and to explore the pattern of covariation between two sets of landmarks. The unilateral PDC group showed an increased first premolar, second premolar, molar widths, and an increased molar depth. No significant difference was found in arch form. The skeletal measurements were generally larger in the PDC group, but the transverse measurements were the most significant. Discriminant Function Analysis (DFA) with cross-validation allowed an accurate classification of 85.9% of the control group and 66.7% of the PDC group. The Mahalanobis distance displayed significant differences among three combinations of groups. Strong covariance was found between the second premolar and all other landmarks. The small sample sizes of the stratified groups precluded recognition of statistical significance. Patients with unilateral PDC displayed significantly wider first, second premolar, and first molar widths, and increased first molar depths. There were no significant differences in arch form; however, GM showed significant differences between the groups and a prominent covariance function for the 2nd premolars.

Is there a better interceptive treatment for unerupted palatally displaced canines? A network meta-analysis.

This systematic review aimed to investigate if there is a better interceptive treatment for palatally displaced canines (PDC) in the mixed dentition stage. The PubMed/MEDLINE, CENTRAL, Scopus, and EMBASE databases were searched for randomized clinical trials related to the research topic. The gray literature and reference lists were also assessed. Network meta-analysis was conducted to analyze the effects of different approaches on PDC eruption. The surface under the cumulative ranking area was calculated to rank the treatments. The certainty of the evidence was evaluated using the GRADE approach. Of the 892 eligible studies, 18 were selected for full-text analysis and 9 for meta-analysis, involving 506 participants and 730 PDC, to compare 9 approaches. The proportion of erupted PDC was significantly higher for all interceptive treatments compared with control (no intervention). Furthermore, the proportion of erupted PDC was higher in patients subjected to rapid maxillary expansion (RME) than those who underwent double extraction of primary canine and primary molar (relative risk (RR) = 2.68 ICr95%: 1.12-9.35). A higher proportion of erupted PDC was found for RME (RR = 3.07 ICr95%: 1.31-10.67), RME plus use of transpalatal arch (TA) plus extraction of primary canine(s) (EC) (RR = 1.43 ICr95%: 1.09-1.95), EC plus use of cervical pull headgear (RR = 1.38 ICr95%: 1.11-1.79), and EC plus use of TA (RR = 1.36 ICr95%: 1.00-1.9) than for EC. RME was most likely to be considered as the best interceptive treatment. Overall, the certainty of the evidence was considered low due to imprecision and indirectness. In conclusion, no intervention in the mixed dentition stage is the worst choice for PDC.

Management of the palatally displaced maxillary canine. Part 2: exposure and orthodontic alignment

In Part 2 of this article, we highlight the differences between the open and closed exposure techniques in the management of palatally displaced canines (PDCs), the mechanical principles of alignment and the management of ankylosis. CPD/Clinical Relevance: The wide positional variation in the presentation of PDCs requires a degree of clinical flexibility with different exposure techniques and treatment mechanics.

Evaluation of maxillary canine root and maxillary bone thickness and density in patients with displaced maxillary canines: A cone-beam tomography study

This study investigated lateral incisor and canine morphology and dimensions, maxillary bone density, and volume in subjects with displaced maxillary canines. Cone-beam computed tomography images for 134 palatally displaced canines (PDCs), 57 buccally displaced canines (BDCs), and 87 nondisplaced canines (NDCs) were analyzed. Canine and lateral incisor dimensions, alveolar bone dimensions, and maxillary bone volume and density were measured. The root length of BDCs was short compared with NDC and PDC groups. The lateral incisor was short in the PDC group compared with NDC and BDC groups. In the BDC group, maxillary bone volume was reduced compared with NDCs and PDCs. Significant differences were detected between BDC and PDC groups in bone density buccal to canines and between BDC and NDC groups in bone density distal to canines. The density of maxillary bone was the highest in the PDC group and the lowest in the BDC group compared with the NDC group. Eight variables were associated with the site of maxillary canine displacement: lateral incisor tip, alveolar bone density, alveolar bone width, bone density buccal to canine, canine width labiopalatally, maxillary bone volume, and canine midsagittal width. In PDCs, the maxillary lateral incisor was short, the canine root had a larger crown/root ratio, and maxillary bone volume was increased compared with NDCs. In BDCs, the canine root was shorter than NDCs and PDCs, maxillary bone volume was reduced compared with NDCs, and bone density at the buccal side was reduced compared with the PDC group.

Dental and Skeletal Age in Patients with Palatally Displaced Canines.

ObjectiveTo determine potential associations between dental and skeletal maturation and palatally displaced canines (PDC) considering gender and chronological age.Material and methodsThis study included pretreatment panoramic and lateral cephalometric radiographs of 43 subjects with PDCs and 203 randomly selected orthodontic subjects with normally erupted canines. Both groups were non syndromic patients. Chronological age of subjects was rounded and noted in years with decimal points and compared with chronological age according to Demirjian's dental age assessment. Skeletal maturation was determined by cervical vertebrae changes on cephalometric radiographs.ResultsFemale subjects with PDC were more affected by left side canine displacement than males (p=0.027) with five times higher odds ratio (OR = 4.9; 95% CIL=1.2-19.7). A comparison of chronologic and skeletal age indicated that PDC subjects were skeletally younger than unaffected groups with statistically significant differences at the age of 10, 12 and 13. (p=0.05).ConclusionYoung subjects with PDCs showed skeletal maturation delay compared to control group, indicating that skeletal maturation assessment could be one of unexplored predicting factors of a PDC, especially at the age between 10 and 13 years in both genders. Subjects with PDC showed intensive growth spurt after the age of 12 years in females, and after the age of 13 in males. Dental maturation delay showed no statistical significance in PDC prediction.

How effective is maxillary expansion as an interceptive treatment in individuals with palatally displaced canines? A systematic review and meta-analysis

The objective was to provide a synthesis of the existing literature on the effectiveness of maxillary expansion in intercepting palatally displaced canines (PDCs). Studies that evaluated the effectiveness of maxillary expansion in subjects with PDCs in the mixed dentition period were included. The following electronic databases were searched until November 30, 2021: MEDLINE (via PubMed), Scopus, Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Cochrane library. Grey literature search and manual search were also performed. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane tool for the one randomized controlled trial (RCT) and the ROBINS-I tool for the non-RCTs. The data were extracted and meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) approach was used to assess the certainty of evidence. Four studies were selected from 9,586 records, which included one RCT and three non-RCTs. The former demonstrated a high risk of bias whereas the non-RCTs showed moderate risk. The meta-analysis of three non-RCTs found no significant improvement in the alpha angle of canines after rapid maxillary expansion, with a difference of -4.26 (95% CI -11.41 to 2.89; P=0.24). The RCT showed an increase in the eruption rate of high-risk canines with rapid maxillary expansion. Slow maxillary expansion did not demonstrate any favorable change. The level of evidence ranged from low to very low. There is insufficient evidence to recommend the use of maxillary expansion as a stand-alone procedure in intercepting PDCs. Additional well-conducted trials are required.

Interceptive Management of Palatally Displaced Canines: Evidence-based Clinical Guidelines

The orthodontic alignment of palatally displaced canines (PDC) can be complex, with potential dental and soft tissue morbidity. Early diagnosis and provision of appropriate interceptive treatment has been shown to reduce the need for surgical exposure and extensive orthodontic treatment. This article reviews the current literature to gain insight into best available research evidence on all types of interceptive measures for the management of PDCs. Other perspectives of the PDC including development, aetiology and assessment are also be discussed. CPD/Clinical Relevance: Interceptive management of PDCs by extracting primary predecessors requires an assessment of the determinant prognostic factors for treatment success and to avoid the removal of primary canines where improvement in PDC is unlikely or where retention of the primary tooth may be the preferred long-term option.

Interventions for promoting the eruption of palatally displaced permanent canine teeth, without the need for surgical exposure, in children aged 9 to 14 years.

A permanent upper(maxillary)caninetooth thatgrowsintotheroofofthemouth andfrequentlydoesnotappear (erupt)iscalled a palatally displaced canine (PDC). The reported prevalence of PDC in the population varies between1% and 3%. Management of the unerupted PDC can be lengthy, involving surgery to uncover the tooth and prolonged orthodontic (brace) treatment to straighten it; therefore, various procedures have been suggested to encourage a PDC to erupt without the need for surgical intervention. To assess the efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of any interceptive procedure to promote the eruption of a PDC compared to no treatment or other interceptive procedures in young people aged 9 to 14 years old. An information specialist searched four bibliographic databases up to 3 February 2021 and used additional search methods to identifypublished, unpublished and ongoing studies. We included randomised controlled trials (RCT) involving at least 80% of children aged between 9 and 14 years, who were diagnosed with an upper PDC and undergoing an intervention to enable the successful eruption of the unerupted PDC, which was compared with an untreated control group or another intervention. Two review authors, independently and in duplicate, examined titles, keywords, abstracts, full articles, extracted data and assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 1 tool (RoB1). The primary outcome was summarised with risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). We reported an intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis when data were available and a modified intention-to-treat (mITT) analysis if not. We also undertook several sensitivity analyses. We used summary of findings tables to present the main findings and our assessment of the certainty of the evidence. We included four studies, involving 199 randomised participants (164 analysed),108 girls and 91 boys, 82 of whom were diagnosed with unilateral PDC and 117 with bilateral PDC. The participants were aged between 8 and 13 years at recruitment. The certainty of the evidence was very low and future research may change our conclusions. One study (randomised 67 participants, 89 teeth) found that extracting the primary canine may increase the proportion of PDCs that successfully erupt into the mouth at 12 months compared with no extraction (RR 2.87, 95% CI 0.90 to 9.23; 45 participants, 45 PDCs analysed; very low-certainty evidence), but the CI included the possibility of no difference; therefore the evidence was uncertain. There was no evidence that extraction of the primary canine reduced the number of young people with a PDC referred for surgery at 12 months (RR 0.61 (95% CI0.29to1.28). Three studies (randomised 132 participants, 227 teeth) found no difference in the proportion of successfully erupted PDCs at 18 months with a double primary tooth extraction compared with extraction of a single primary canine (RR 0.68,95% CI0.35 to 1.31; 119 participants analysed, 203 PDCs; mITT;very low-certainty evidence). Two of these studies found no difference in the proportions referred for surgical exposure between the single and the double primary extraction groups data at 48 months (RR 0.31, 95% CI 0.06 to 1.45). There are some descriptive data suggesting that the more severe the displacement of the PDC towards the midline, the lower the proportion of successfully erupted PDCs with or without intervention. The evidence that extraction of the primary canine in a young person aged between 9 and 14 years diagnosed with a PDC may increase the proportion of erupted PDCs, without surgical intervention, is very uncertain. There is no evidence that double extraction of primary teeth increases the proportion of erupted PDC compared with a single primary tooth extraction at 18 months or the proportion referred for surgery by 48 months. Because we have only low to very low certainty in these findings, future research is necessary to help us know for sure the best way to deal with upper permanent teeth that are not erupting as expected.

Open and closed surgical exposure of palatally displaced canines: a cost-minimization analysis of a multicentre, randomized controlled trial.

To evaluate the costs of open and closed surgical exposure and subsequent orthodontic treatment for the correction of palatally displaced canines (PDCs). A multicentre, two-arm parallel group randomized controlled trial. One hundred twenty adolescents between 9 and 16 years of age, from three orthodontic specialist centres, were randomized to one of the two surgical exposure interventions. The randomization was conducted according to a two-arm parallel group 1:1 allocation ratio, using computerized lists with block randomization. In both the surgical techniques, whole mucoperiosteal flaps were raised, and bone covering the PDCs was removed. In the open technique, glass ionomer was built up on the PDC crown - reaching above the mucosa through a hole punched in the flap - to allow the canine to erupt autonomously. After eruption, the canine was orthodontically moved above the mucosa. In the closed technique, an eyelet was bonded onto the PDC, the flap was repositioned and the canine was orthodontically moved beyond the mucosa. The trial ended when the PDC was successfully aligned in the dental arch.Cost analysis was performed including costs for surgery, orthodontic treatment, emergency visits, and material, as well as costs for transports and time spent in connection with every appointment. Patients and caregivers could not be blinded due to obvious limitations of the clinical setting, while outcome assessors and data analysts were blinded. A cost-minimization analysis was performed since both exposure groups succeeded equally well in terms of treatment effects. The two different surgical exposures and following orthodontic treatments did not differ significantly in terms of costs. Costs are estimated in the Swedish setting, which needs to be considered if applying the results in other settings. Calculations of total cost do not include finishing, debonding, retention, and follow-up. There is no significant difference in costs between closed and open surgical exposure with following orthodontic treatments in PDCs. ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT02186548.

Dental age estimation of young subjects with unilateral palatally displaced canine teeth

Delayed tooth eruption is often seen in patients with palatally displaced canines (PDC), but there is controversy over whether tooth formation is also delayed. This study attempts to elucidate the answer by addressing methodological shortcomings in previous studies. Archived records were searched, and 100 patients (aged 8-16years) with unilateral PDC were identified. Records of 50 women and 50 men were matched for age and sex with unaffected controls. The exclusion criteria included hypodontia. Dental age (DA) was calculated using the population-specific Maltese database and subtracted from the chronological age (CA). Nonparametric tests were used to compare CA-DA in patients with PDC and controls to determine the DA of end-of-series teeth. No statistically significant difference with CA-DA between patients with PDC and controls was found. In addition, there were no particular teeth significantly delayed in development. Unilateral PDC does not affect dental developmental age, and the end-of-series teeth investigated show no delay in development.

Open vs closed surgical exposure of palatally displaced canines: a comparison of clinical and patient-reported outcomes-a multicentre, randomized controlled trial.

To compare treatment time, patients' perceptions during orthodontic treatment, dental fear and side effects, between open and closed surgical exposures in patients with palatally displaced canines (PDCs). Multicentre, randomized controlled trial, with random 1:1 allocation of two parallel groups. One hundred and twenty patients from three different orthodontic centres were randomized into one of the two intervention arms, open or closed surgical exposure. Both techniques had mucoperiosteal flaps raised and bone removed above the PDCs. In open exposure, tissue was removed above the canine, and glass ionomer - reaching above soft tissue - was built on the crown. The canine was then left to erupt spontaneously, prior to orthodontic alignment. At closed exposure, a chain was bonded to the canine and orthodontic traction was applied under the mucosa until eruption. Orthodontic alignment of the canines was undertaken after eruption into the oral cavity, with fixed appliances in both groups. All participants were treated according to intention to treat (ITT). Due to the nature of this trial, only outcome assessors could be blinded to the intervention group. One hundred and seventeen patients completed the trial. All PDCs were successfully aligned. Total treatment time was equal in the two techniques, mean difference -0.1 months (95% CI -3.2 to 2.9, P = 0.93). The closed group experienced more pain and discomfort during the active orthodontic traction. Dental fear, root resorption and periodontal status did not show any clinically significant differences between the groups. Results of this randomized controlled trial (RCT) can be generalized only to a similar population aged 9-16 years, if exclusion criteria are met. The closed exposure group experienced more pain and discomfort mostly during active orthodontic traction. All other studied outcomes were similar between the two exposure groups. ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT02186548 and Researchweb.org, ID: 127201.

Rapid maxillary expansion for interceptive orthodontic treatment of palatally displaced canine: A systematic review.

The present systematic review aims to summarise the relevant randomised clinical trials and estimate the efficacy of interceptive orthodontic intervention, in particular if an interceptive treatment with rapid maxillary expansion could be successful in managing of palatally displaced canines (PDCs). A search strategy was developed on electronic databases including Medline, Web of Science, Scopus and Cochrane Collaboration Trial from 1925 to 2019. Two reviewers independently reviewed the sources deciding for a full reading according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Methodological quality criteria were applied to the selected articles. Three randomised clinical trials (RCTs) and one prospective longitudinal study were included in the systematic review. Generally, the intervention groups showed a higher incidence of successful eruption of PDCs (45.1% - 65.7%) compared with the control groups (13.1% - 13.6%). Based on the literature published, authors reached a reasonable conclusion that rapid maxillary expansion can facilitate the eruption of PDCs. Authors suggest to associate maxillary expansion with deciduous canine extraction or prevention of mesial movement of the upper first molars.

Variables to predict spontaneous eruption of palatally displaced permanent canine after interceptive extraction of primary canine: A systematic review and meta-analysis

To evaluate the effectiveness of different diagnostic variables measured on panoramic radiographs (PAN) to predict spontaneous eruption of palatally displaced canine (PDC) after interceptive extraction in late mixed dentition. Digital databases (MEDLINE, CENTRAL (Cochrane), Scopus, clinicaltrials.gov, ISRCTN registry) and hand searches were performed up to March 2020. Both randomized and non-randomized controlled trials were considered for the review. Study selection, data extraction, risk of bias assessment (RoB2.0 and ROBINS-I), and the certainty of evidence evaluation (GRADE) were performed according to Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. The random-effects method for quantitative synthesis of dichotomous as well as continuous data was used. Out of 767 retrieved records, 4 controlled trials fulfilled the eligibility criteria and were included in the review. Studies were assessed at low risk of bias except one. Overall certainty was strong to moderate. PDCs in distal sectors (RR: 1.621; 95%CI: 1.259 to 2.086; P<0.001) and alpha-angle <30° (SMD: -1.350; 95%CI: 1.924 to -0.776; P<0.001) were significantly benefited from interceptive extraction. However, Vertical distance of PDC cusp tip from occlusal plane had statistically insignificant (p: 0.855) roll on eruption prediction. Interceptive extraction at a younger age, initial horizontal localization (sector position), and alpha-angle (initial mesial inclination) are the most important variables predicting the spontaneous eruption of palatally displaced canines. Findings of this review can be utilized to make evidence-based decisions for managing PDCs with diverse sectors and mesial inclinations. However, well-designed clinical trials are recommended to strengthen the evidence.

Surgical-Periodontal aspects in orthodontic traction of palatally displaced canines: a meta-analysis.

The aim was to determine whether there is a difference in the periodontal aspect (gingival recession, probing pocket depth) of the palatally displaced canine (PDC) compared to the contralateral canine. Also, from a surgical perspective, sought to determine whether there is a difference (surgical duration, postoperative pain) between the surgical techniques. The word combinations were adapted for each electronic database: PubMed, LILACS, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and gray literature. Studies that met the following criteria were considered eligible: (P) Patients who received orthodontic-surgical treatment for correction of PDC; (I) Performing orthodontic-surgical treatment for traction of the PDC; (C) Comparison of the tractioned canine with its contralateral or between the two techniques; (O) Gingival recession, probing pocket depth, postoperative complications and surgical duration; (S) Randomized and nonrandomized clinical studies or observational studies. The overall prevalence of gingival recession was estimated to be 10.53% [95% CI, 3.87% - 25.59%; I2 = 88%]. No statistically significant difference (p > 0.05) was found between the means of the variables gingival recession, probing pocket depth and surgical duration. The evidence suggests that traction of palatally displaced canines can be considered a reliable and acceptable procedure.

Double vs single primary tooth extraction in interceptive treatment of palatally displaced canines.

To compare the impact of primary canine and primary first molar extractions with extractions of only the primary canine regarding correction of palatally displaced canines (PDCs). Thirty-two children aged 9.5-13.5 years with 48 PDCs were randomly allocated to either the double-extraction group (DEG) or single-extraction group (SEG). Clinical and radiographic examinations were performed at baseline and at 6-month intervals until the canine emerged or orthodontic treatment was started. Outcome measures were: emergence of maxillary canine (yes/no), emergence of maxillary canine into a favorable position (yes/no), and maxillary canine positional change (angulation and sector). Factors influencing PDC emergence were analyzed using logistic regression. In the DEG, 64% (16/25) of canines emerged into the oral cavity vs 78% (18/23) in the SEG (P = .283). Favorable PDC position at trial end was seen in 64% (16/25) of the DEG vs 57% (13/23) of the SEG (P = .600). Significant distal movement of PDCs was recorded in the DEG and SEG, though no significant difference was observed between groups. Significant predictors of canine emergence were initial canine angulation (Angle A) (P = .008) and space conditions at T0 (P = .030). Double or single primary tooth extraction procedures are equivalent in supporting PDC eruption into the oral cavity and into a favorable position in the dental arch. Initial canine angulation and space assessments may be used as predictors of successful PDC eruption.