This paper discusses the problems of ecological distribution in avian mixed population of closely related sympatric species as revealed in the Paridae community in Japan. Structure and distribution of home ranges of five species of tits (Aegithalidae and Paridae) are compared by analysing intra-and inter-specific relations in the ecological separation of social structure between species.1. The vegetation of artificial mixed forests of study area in the mountain region about 1000m of altitude in central Japan, consisted of deciduous woods of Quercus serrata, Castanea crenata, Betula platyphylla and Alnus Japonica and coniferous plantations of Pinus densiflora and Larix leptolepis.2. In these mixed forests, five tit species Aegithalos caudatus, Parus major, P. ater P. montanus and P. varius are sympatric and Ae. caudatus, P. major and P. ater maintain annually stable high population densities, P. montanus has low density and P. varius is represented by only one pair.3. Social systems of Aegithalos and Parus are essentially different. That of Aegithalos is characterized by flock unit which is maintained by flock territoriality, consisting of 'flock range' and 'flock members'. During winter, the territoriality of flock unit is strengthened by 'group displays' and in the breeding season the means of maintenance of territoriality are shifted from 'flock unit'to 'pair unit'. In Parus, on the other hand, the base of social system is the 'pair unit', which is emphasized by singing activities and fighting behaviour and in winter the territoriality is weakened, with the result that the home range of pair unit is extended and the tendency of flocking together with adjacent pair unit is raised.4. The pair unit in Parus is maintained through the winter, especially in milder weather. The tendency of pair unit is strongest in P. montanus, while P. major and P. ater show the tendency for flocking. However, although there are gradations of types in the species of Parus between flocking and pairing tendencies which are also subject to population densities, there esists no intermediate type between flock unit system of Aegithalos and that of pair unit in Parus. This is the essential difference of social systems of these two genera.5. The patterns of ecological separation (or segregation) in the interspecific relations are different by winter and breeding seasons. In winter, the separation occurs in vertical layers of the forest and in breeding season it is horizontally mosaic, with distinct interspecific overlaps of home ranges, but main feeding areas are segregated. The pair unit supported by territoriality has important function in dividing same resources intraspecifically, but interspecifically the pair units are overlapped.6. No case of interspecific territoriality is known among Parus species, although interspecific territorial overlaps are found in P. montanus-varius group and P. major-ater group along the marginal zones of habitat of each species. Wide overlaps of distribution among tit species are, in my opinion, the effect of mutual avoidance within a mixed flock, not being the process of the development of interspecific territoriality.7. Parus species make mixed groups (or flocks) attracted by and attached to Aegithalos flock which is 'flock-unit' society, but Parus species society is basically 'pair-unit', although it makes flock by grouping of pair-units.
Read full abstract