Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size Notes 1. Sally Banes, Terpsichore in Sneakers (Boston: Houghton-Mifflin Co., 1980). 2. See Noël Carroll, “The Concept of Postmodernism from a Philosophical Point of View,” in International Postmodernism, ed. Douwe Foukkema and Hans Bertens (Philadelphia: Benjamins, 1997). 3. Clement Greenberg, Art and Culture (Boston: Beacon, 1961). 4. Arthur Danto, After the End of Art: Contemporary Art and the Pale of History (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1997). 5. David Michael Levin, “Balanchine's Formalism,” in What Is Dance? ed. Roger Copeland and Marshall Cohen (New York: Oxford University Press, 1983), p. 138. 6. Noël Carroll, “The Philosophy of Art History, Dance, and the 1960s,” in Reinventing Dance in the 1960s: Everything Was Possible, ed. by Sally Banes (with Andrea Harris) (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 2003), pp. 95- 6. 7. Our discussion of Cunningham in this essay, including our description of his movement, has been deeply influenced by Roger Copeland's excellent book Merce Cunningham: The Modernizing of Modern Dance (London: Routledge, 2004). 8. Copeland, pp. 39–43. 9. Noël Carroll, “Cage and Philosophy,” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, Vol. 52, No. 1 (Winter 1994), pp. 93–8. 10. For further descriptions of postmodern dances, see Sally Banes, Democracy's Body: Judson Dance Theater 1962–64 (Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 1993). 11. Quoted in Beyond the Mainstream, directed by Merrill Brockway and produced by Merrill Brockway and Carl Carlson for Dance in America, WNET-TV, New York, May 21, 1980. Moreover, walking continued to be a constant in postmodern choreography into the 1970s, notably in some of the work of Lucinda Childs. 12. On the significance of ordinary movement for Rainer, see Noël Carroll, “Yvonne Rainer and the Recuperation of Everyday Life,” in Yvonne Rainer: Radical Juxtapositions 1961–2002, ed. by Sid Sachs (Philadelphia: University of the Arts, 2002), pp. 65–85. 13. Rauschenberg said, “A pair of socks is no less suitable to make a painting than wood, nails, turpentine, oil, and fabric.” Quoted in Unnatural Wonders: Essays from the Gap between Art and Life by Arthur Danto (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2005), p. ix. 14. Roger Copeland, Merce Cunningham: The Modernizing of Modern Dance (London: Routledge, 2004). Although our treatment of Cunningham's work is indebted throughout to this admirable book, there is one point where we do strongly disagree with Professor Copeland's views. In a provocative homologue, he associates Graham with abstract expressionism and Cunningham with the aesthetics of Rauschenberg and Jasper Johns. We think there are several errors here. If Cunningham's endeavor is distinct from that of abstract expressionism as characterized by Harold Rosenberg, his modernism is in sync with Pollock's as described by Clement Greenberg. Copeland associates Graham with abstract expressionism, but this also seems wrong. Insofar as Graham remains involved with stories about human characters, her dances are expressionist, maybe, but not abstract. Finally, Rauschenberg and Johns are integrationists by our lights. They do not belong to the same artistic camp as Cunningham does. Their contributions in their collaborations with Cunningham coexist with his, rather than reinforcing them, in a way parallel to Cage's contributions (as discussed above). Thus, we want to challenge Copeland's assimilation of Cunningham to Rauschenberg's project and, instead, align him with the modernist wing of abstract expressionism. 15. For the distinction between representation and exemplification as contrasting symbolic modes, see Nelson Goodman, Languages of Art (Indianapolis, Ind: Bobbs-Merrill, 1968).
Read full abstract