Pain Management In Trauma Patients Research Articles

Intercostal cryonerve block versus elastomeric infusion pump for postoperative analgesia following surgical stabilization of traumatic rib fractures

ObjectivePatients with blunt thoracic trauma requiring surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) frequently experience severe pain. Further, a rising prevalence of opioid-tolerant patients sustain traumatic injuries. The optimal pain management adjunct for concurrent use with SSRF remains uncertain. This study compared outcomes in patients undergoing SSRF with concomitant cryonerve block (CryoNB) or ropivacaine 0.2% elastomeric infusion pump (EIP). MethodsA single-center retrospective comparative analysis was performed at a level II trauma center. A query of our institution's trauma registry of consecutive patients undergoing SSRF from October 2017 to November 2020 with either intercostal CryoNB or ropivacaine 0.2% EIP was conducted. Opioid consumption in oral morphine equivalents (OME), patient-reported pain scores by numerical rating scale, and pulmonary function measured by incentive spirometry effort (mL) were collected at baseline and on postoperative days 1–3. Results were analyzed using a linear-mixed-effects model. Length of stay (LOS), complications, and hospital charges were assessed as secondary outcomes. ResultsTwenty-six patients meeting inclusion criteria were evaluated. Patient demographics, injury, and surgical variables were similar between groups. The estimated effect for patients treated with CryoNB (n = 14) compared to EIP (n = 12) demonstrated a 25% (estimated -1.37 OME, 95% CI, -2.411 to -0.335, p = 0.01) reduction in hospital opioid requirements, fewer discharge opioids (41.3 mg (37.5–45) versus 175 mg (150- 200), p = 0.03), 22% (estimated -1.506, 95% CI, -2.722 to -0.290, p = 0.02) reduction in pain scores, and shorter postoperative LOS (4 days (4–5) versus 6 days (5–9.5), p = 0.04). Pulmonary function (estimated -48.8 mL, 95% CI, -312.74 to 215.05, p = 0.71), total hospital costs (CryoNB: $90,224 ± 34,633; EIP: $131,498 ± 73,072, p = 0.07), and complications were no different between cohorts. ConclusionThe addition of intercostal CryoNB as an adjunct to multimodal pain management in trauma patients undergoing surgical fixation of rib fractures may be of benefit. Based on our early data, this technique appears to be promising in reducing opioid requirements and providing an extended duration of pain control without increased costs or complications.

Pain Management with Inhalation of Methoxyflurane Administrated by Non-Medical Ski Patrol: A Quality Assessment Study.

Pain management can be challenging, especially in remote locations where first responders are not certified health care personnel. In these settings, traditional intravenous administration of analgesics is not feasible. In this study, we explore the feasibility of using methoxyflurane as a first-line analgesic in ski-related traumas, administered by the ski patrol, acting as the municipality physician's aiding personnel. This is a quality assessment of a project aimed at improving pain management in trauma patients at the largest ski resort in Norway. Members of the ski patrol were trained and delegated administration of methoxyflurane on behalf of the municipality physician. Patients > 18years with ski-related trauma and pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) of 6 or more were included. The patients received inhalational methoxyflurane on site, with continued administration during transport. Data were collected by the ski patrol and entered into a quality register. In total, 53 patients (18 to 76years, 32 (60%) males) accepted to be registered. The injuries were fractures in 35 (66%), joint luxation in seven (13%), combination of fracture and luxation in seven (13%), and blunt soft tissue damage in four (8%) cases. Median NRS before administration of methoxyflurane was 8 decreasing to median NRS 5 after 5-10min. The median NRS reduction of 3 (25-75% percentiles 2-5) was significant, p < 0.001. Patients rated the perceived effect as good in 40 (80%) moderate in nine (18%) and no effect in 1 (2%). Side effects were mild: Six patients (11%) experienced dizziness, one patient (2%) was considered drowsy. Methoxyflurane is feasible as a first-line analgesic administered by a non-medical ski patrol in a responsibly organized system. Early pain management with inhalation of methoxyflurane provides good perceived effect with mild adverse events and can be of great value in settings where few alternatives for pain management are available.

The Pain Management of Trauma Patients in the Emergency Department.

The vast majority of injured patients suffer from pain. Systematic assessment of pain on admission to the emergency department (ED) is a cornerstone of translating the best treatment strategies for patient care into practice. Pain must be measured with severity scales that are validated in clinical practice, including for specific populations (such as children and older adults). Although primary care ED of trauma patients focuses on resuscitation, diagnosis and treatment, pain assessment and management remains a critical element as professionals are not prepared to provide effective and early therapy. To date, most EDs have pain assessment and management protocols that take into account the patient's hemodynamic status and clinical condition and give preference to non-pharmacological approaches where possible. When selecting medications, the focus is on those that are least disruptive to hemodynamic status. Pain relief may still be necessary in hemodynamically unstable patients, but caution should be exercised, especially when using opioids, as absorption may be impaired or shock may be exacerbated. The analgesic dose of ketamine is certainly an attractive option. Fentanyl is clearly superior to other opioids in initial resuscitation and treatment as it has minimal effects on hemodynamic status and does not cause central nervous system depression. Inhaled analgesia techniques and ultrasound-guided nerve blocks are also increasingly effective solutions. A multimodal pain approach, which involves the use of two or more drugs with different mechanisms of action, plays an important role in the relief of trauma pain. All EDs must have policies and promote the adoption of procedures that use multimodal strategies for effective pain management in all injured patients.

Pain Management in Trauma Patients Referred to the Emergency Department of Imam Reza General Hospital, Tabriz, Iran

Background: Trauma patients with acute pain are often triaged when experiencing less pain than urgency level; therefore, they have to wait longer to receive analgesics. Methods: The data was collected using Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) and a checklist. After data collection, descriptive statistical methods (tables, graphs, and mean±standard deviation) and analytical statistics (ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis, and chi-square tests) were used to analyze the data in SPSS version 20.0. Results: The pain intensity score (mean±standard deviation) of patients at admission and discharge from the medical center was 7.81±0.89 and 3.69±0.49, respectively. The mean time of the patient’s first visit was 3.47±15.20 minutes. According to Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric test, there was a statistically significant difference in the duration of patients’ examination by a physician (P&lt;0.001). The waiting time for the first treatment to relieve the pain was 13.5±3.6 minutes. In patients referred to the emergency department, the satisfaction rate was 97.4%. Conclusion: Narcotics were the most commonly used analgesic drug with immediate effect on pain reduction. The patients’ satisfaction with pain relief was ideal.

Acute Traumatic Pain in the Emergency Department.

Trauma is a major cause of mortality throughout the world. Traumatic pain-acute, sudden, or chronic-is defined as "an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with actual or potential tissue damage". Patients' perceptions of pain assessment and management have become an important criterion and relevant outcome measure for healthcare institutions. Several studies show that 60-70% of ER patients experience pain, and more than half of them express a feeling of sorrow, which can be moderate or severe, at triage. The few studies that have analyzed how pain is assessed and managed in these departments agree that approximately 70% of patients receive no analgesia or receive it with remarkable delay. Specifically, less than half of the patients receive treatment for pain during admission and 60% of discharged patients have higher intensity pain than at admission. Trauma patients are also the ones who most commonly report low satisfaction with pain management. Associated with this lack of satisfaction, we can describe the poor use of tools for measuring and recording pain, poor communication among caregivers, inadequate training in pain assessment and management, and widespread misconceptions among nurses about the reliability of patients' estimation of pain. The aim of this article is to review the scientific literature to explore the methodologies of pain management in trauma patients attending the emergency room and analyzing their weaknesses as a starting point to improve the approach to this, unfortunately too often, underestimated issue. A literature search was performed using the major databases to identify relevant studies in indexed scientific journals. The literature showed that the multimodal approach in trauma patients is the best approach to pain management. It is becoming increasingly crucial to manage the patient on multiple fronts. Drugs acting on different pathways can be administered together at lower doses, minimizing risks. Every emergency department must have staff trained in the assessment and immediate management of pain symptoms as this allows the reduction of mortality and morbidity and shortens hospital stays, contributing to early mobilization, reduced hospital costs, and enhanced patient satisfaction and quality of life.

Racial and Ethnic Disparity in Prehospital Pain Management for Trauma Patients.

Although evidence suggests that racial and ethnic minority (REM) patients receive inadequate pain management in the acute care setting, it remains unclear whether these disparities also occur during the prehospital period. The aim of this study is to assess the impact of race and ethnicity on prehospital analgesic use by emergency medical services (EMS) in trauma patients. Retrospective chart review of adult trauma patients aged 18 to 89 years old transported by EMS to our American College of Surgeons-verified level 1 trauma center from 2014 to 2020. Patients who identified as Black, Asian, Native American, or Other for race and/or Hispanic or Latino or Unknown for ethnicity were considered REM. Patients who identified as White, non-Hispanic were considered White. Groups were compared in univariate and multivariate analysis. The primary outcome was prehospital analgesic administration. A total of 2,476 patients were transported by EMS (47% White and 53% REM). White patients were older on average (46 years vs 38 years; p < 0.001) and had higher rates of blunt trauma (76% vs 60%; p < 0.001). There were no differences in Injury Severity Score (21 vs 20; p = 0.22). Although REM patients reported higher subjective pain rating (7.2 vs 6.6; p = 0.002), they were less likely to get prehospital pain medication (24% vs 35%; p < 0.001), and that difference remained significant after controlling for baseline characteristics, transport method, pain rating, prehospital hypotension, and payor status (adjusted odds ratio [95% CI], 0.67 [0.47 to 0.96]; p = 0.03). Patients from racial and ethnic minority groups were less likely to receive prehospital pain medication after traumatic injury than White patients. Forms of conscious and unconscious bias contributing to this inequity need to be identified and addressed.

Health disparities in regional anesthesia and analgesia for the management of acute pain in trauma patients.

Health disparities in regional anesthesia and analgesia for the management of acute pain in trauma patients.

Improving acute pain management of trauma patients on medication-assisted therapy.

Approximately 9,500,000 people in the United States misused opioids in 2020. Many people manage their opioid use disorder (OUD) with medication-assisted treatment (MAT). Using MAT to address OUD adds to the complexities and challenges of adequate acute pain control. Chart review indicated only 20% of trauma patients on MAT achieved adequate pain control on the trauma service at the University of Louisville Hospital. This quality initiative aimed to increase patient pain control to 50% in 90 days. A rapid cycle quality improvement project with four plan-do-study-act (PDSA) cycles was conducted over 8 weeks. Four core interventions were implemented concurrently, with tests of change biweekly. Qualitative and qualitative data analyses were completed at each cycle. The core interventions included a risk assessment tool, shared decision-making (SDM) tool, provider checklist, and a team engagement plan. The number of patients with a pain score of ≤5 (scale 0-10) increased to 78% from 20%. The mean pain score decreased from 8 to 4.6. The fourth PDSA cycle results showed a 92% patient engagement with SDM and 100% utilization of the provider checklist. Team engagement scores greater than 4 on a 5-point Likert scale were 86%. Effective patient-centered acute pain control for trauma patients on MAT is achievable. The combined use of an SDM tool and a provider checklist was an efficient way to provide effective and patient-centered care and positively affected patient outcomes.

Comparison of Meperidine and Tenoxicam For Pain Management in Trauma Patients

Comparison of Meperidine and Tenoxicam For Pain Management in Trauma Patients

Inequity in discharge pain management for trauma patients with limited English proficiency.

Pain management is critical for optimal recovery after trauma. Previous work at our institution revealed differences in pain assessment by patient language, which may impact management. This study aimed to understand differences in discharge opioid prescribing for trauma patients with limited English proficiency (LEP). We conducted a cross-sectional study of adult trauma patients discharged to the community from a diverse, urban level 1 trauma center in 2018. Opioid prescriptions were obtained from discharge pharmacy records and converted to standard oral morphine equivalents (OMEs). Multivariable logistic and quantile regression was used to examine the relationship between LEP, opioid prescriptions, and OMEs at discharge, controlling for demographic and clinical characteristics. Of 1,419 patients included in this study, 83% were English proficient (EP) and 17% were LEP. At discharge, 56% of EP patients received an opioid prescription, compared with 41% of LEP patients. In multivariable models, EP patients were 1.63 times more likely to receive any opioid prescription (95% CI, 1.17-2.25; p = 0.003). Mean OME was 147 for EP and 94 for LEP patients. In multivariable models, the difference between EP and LEP patients was 40 OMEs (95% CI, 21.10-84.22; p = 0.004). In adjusted quantile regression models, differences in total OMEs increased with the amount of OMEs prescribed. There was no difference in OMEs at the 20th and 40th percentile of total OMEs, but LEP patients received 26 fewer OMEs on average at the 60th percentile (95% CI, -3.23 to 54.90; p = 0.081) and 45 fewer OMEs at the 80th percentile (95% CI, 5.48-84.48; p = 0.026). Limited English proficiency patients with traumatic injuries were less likely to receive any opioid prescription and were prescribed lower quantities of opiates, which could contribute to suboptimal pain management and recovery. Addressing these disparities is an important focus for future quality improvement efforts. Care Management, level IV.

Assessing the effectiveness of ketorolac in pain management of traumatic injuries in prehospital emergency care services

Objective: Pain is usually one of the most common symptoms among all traumatic injuries. One of the drugs that has recently entered the Iranian prehospital emergency system is ketorolac. Ketorolac is a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) that inhibits prostaglandin synthesis by inhibiting cyclooxygenase activity and reduces pain and inflammation. It can be considered as the strongest analgesic drug in this category. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of ketorolac in pain management of traumatic injuries in a prehospital setting. Methods: This descriptive cross-sectional study was undertaken to evaluate the effectiveness of a treatment method in the pain management of traumatic injuries in the prehospital environment of Lorestan province in Iran. We included 134 injured patients from road emergency bases of Lorestan province. In order to control the pain of these injured patients, 30 mg of ketorolac was injected slowly intravenously in one minute. Pain was measured in the time interval of zero minutes (before injection), 15 minutes, 30 minutes, and 45 minutes by visual acuity scale (VAS). The analysis of the obtained data was performed by SPSS software version 23. Results: The mean age of participants was 37.42±23.6. There were 47 female injuries (35.1%) and 87 male injuries (64.9%). In terms of pain intensity, 49 patients (36.6%) had moderate pain (VAS=4-6) and 85 patients (63.4%) had severe pain (VAS=7-10). The average of pain relief in the injured group with severe and moderate pain 15 minutes after the injection was 0.471 and 0.878 (P=0.001), respectively. In addition, the mean of pain relief in the injured group with severe and moderate pain 30 minutes after the injection was 1.124 and 1.796, respectively (P=0.001). Pain reduction in the group of severely injured patients with moderate pain in the first 30 minutes was statistically significant. Conclusion: Findings revealed that ketorolac is a suitable drug in pain management for trauma patients with moderate and severe pain in trauma patients. On the other hand, due to the peak effect (more than 30 minutes), it is not an effective drug for trauma patients with severe pain in a short period transferred to the prehospital environment.

Optimizing Pain Control and Minimizing Opioid Use in Trauma Patients

Adverse effects of opioids and the ongoing crisis of opioid abuse have prompted providers to reduce prescribing opioids and increase use of multiple nonpharmacologic therapies, nonopioid analgesics, and co-analgesics for pain management in trauma patients. Nonopioid agents, including acetaminophen, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, gabapentinoids, ketamine, central α2 agonists, and lidocaine, can be used as adjuncts or alternatives to opioids in the trauma population. Complementary therapies such as acupuncture, virtual reality, and mirror therapy are modalities that also may be helpful in reducing pain. Performing pain assessments is fundamental to identify pain and evaluate treatment effectiveness in the critically ill trauma patient. The efficacy, safety, and availability of opioid-sparing therapies and multimodal pain regimens are reviewed.

Pain Management in Trauma: Maximizing Multimodals to Minimize Opioids

The US has been challenged with an opioid crisis, as these medications account for a substantial number of fatal and nonfatal overdoses. Surgeons are on the front lines of this epidemic, balancing the treatment of pain, while confronting the risks of opioids, such as gastrointestinal effects, respiratory distress, delirium, increased hospital length of stay, and potential misuse or diversion. 1 Yorkgitis B.K. Brat G.A. Postoperative opioid prescribing: Getting it RIGHTT. Am J Surg. 2018; 215: 707-711 Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (21) Google Scholar ,2 American College of Surgeons Quality ProgramsBest practices guidelines for acute pain management in trauma patients. Nov 2020. https://www.facs.org/-/media/files/quality-programs/trauma/tqip/acute_pain_guidelines.ashxDate accessed: December 22, 2020 Google Scholar Recently, progress has been made in this battle, as opioid-related deaths fell in 2018 for the first time in decades. 3 Centers for Disease Control and PreventionDrug overdose deaths in the United States, 1999-2018. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db356.htmDate accessed: December 21, 2020 Google Scholar The decrease in opioid-related deaths mirrors opioid prescribing rates, as they have been declining over the recent years. 4 Centers for Disease Control and PreventionPrescribing practices. https://www.cdc.gov/drugoverdose/data/prescribing/prescribing-practices.htmlDate accessed: December 21, 2020 Google Scholar Multi-Modal Analgesic Strategy for Trauma: A Pragmatic Randomized Clinical TrialJournal of the American College of SurgeonsVol. 232Issue 3PreviewAn effective strategy to manage acute pain and minimize opioid exposure is needed for injured patients. In this trial, we aimed to compare 2 multimodal pain regimens (MMPRs) for minimizing opioid exposure and relieving acute pain in a busy, urban trauma center. Full-Text PDF

Implications of positive urine toxicology screening in trauma patients.

Pain management in trauma patients can be difficult due to their varied injuries and presence or absence of illicit substances in their systems. Additionally, trauma patients have variable lengths of stay. Limiting length of stay to what is medically necessary and preventing long-term dependence on narcotic medications are important in trauma patient care. We performed a retrospective review of 385 consecutive trauma activations at a Level II trauma center with urine toxicology screens from 2015. Main outcome measures recorded were urine toxicology results, average daily morphine milligram equivalents (MME), length of stay (LOS), injury severity score (ISS). We also recorded patient demographic information. Statistical analysis compared outcomes and demographics between trauma patients with positive urine toxicology screens to those with negative screens. Significance was set at p<0.05. Positive urine toxicology screens were present in 230/385 (59.7%) patients. The median (interquartile range (IQR)) daily MME usage in the positive urine toxicology group was 25.2 (12.0-48.6) versus 12.4 (2.5-27.5) for those with a negative drug screen (p < 0.001). Median LOS was 3 (1-6) days versus 2 (1-4) days for the positive and negative groups, respectively (p=0.004). There were no differences in age, gender distribution, or ISS between the two groups. Subgroup analysis showed urine toxicology positive for opiates, benzodiazepines, and tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) were associated with increased daily MME. Benzodiazepines and amphetamines were associated with increased LOS. This study identifies a positive toxicology screening as a risk factor for increased narcotic demands and longer length of stay in trauma patients. These findings may assist in developing treatment plans and setting expectations in this population. This information can also lead to proactive interventions aimed at minimizing narcotic use and shortening LOS in this population.

Assessment of the effectiveness of pain management among trauma patients in the emergency department

Background: In the emergency department (ED), pain is the most common complaint, especially among trauma patients. However, two-thirds of trauma patients are discharged from EDs with moderate to severe pain. Therefore, pain management is an important part of care in trauma patients. Objective: To assess the effectiveness of pain management among trauma patients in the ED. Method: This is a retrospective cohort study conducted on adult trauma patients who attended the ED in King Abdulaziz medical city (KAMC) in Jeddah from June 2016 to July 2018. The study evaluated if the pain was evaluated during the patient encounters, and the pain score was registered. Furthermore, we assessed if pain medications were administered, their type and dosage, and the pain score evaluation before and after administration. Pain score was scored using the numeric pain scale. Data were collected from the health information system (Best care�) and analyzed using SPSS version 24. Results: Initial pain assessment occurred only in 69% of our population, while assessment after medication administration happened in 71% of patients. The median between the time of arrival and the time of Initial Assessment was 19 minutes. The Mean difference between pain scores before and after pain management was one on a numeric pain scale with a P-Value of 0.001. 36.7% of Patients received appropriate medication based on their pain score improvement result. Opioid was used as an initial pain management drug in 35% of patients. Conclusion: There is a big room for improvement in pain management in trauma patients in emergency departments. Emergency care providers should observe the timeliness and appropriateness of pain management. Evaluation and re-evaluation of pain before and after pain medications or other pain-relieving intervention needs to be more frequent and efficient.

The Efficacy of Ketamine Administration in Prehospital Pain Management of Trauma Patients; a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Although previous articles and reviews suggest that ketamine might effectively manage pain in trauma patients, these articles have serious limitations. Accordingly, the current meta-analysis aims to investigate the efficacy of ketamine administration in prehospital pain management of trauma patients. In the present meta-analysis, controlled human studies were included. An extensive search was conducted in electronic databases including Medline (via PubMed), Embase, Central, Scopus, Web of Science, and ProQuest, gathering data to the end of 2018. The efficacy and side effects of ketamine administration in pre-hospital pain management were compared with those of opioid analgesics based on standard mean difference (SMD) and odds ratio (OR) calculations with 95% confidence interval (95% CI). Data from seven articles were included in the present meta-analysis. Ketamine administration was not more effective than administrating morphine or fentanyl in prehospital pain management of trauma patients (SMD = -0.56, 95% CI: -1.38 to 0.26, p = 0.117). However, co-administration of ketamine+morphine was considerably more effective than ketamine alone, in alleviating pain in prehospital settings (SMD = -0.62, 95% CI: -1.12 to -0.12, p = 0.010). Finally, it was concluded that ketamine alone had less side effects than morphine alone (OR = 0.25, 95% CI: 0.11 to 0.56, p = 0.001). However, co-administration of ketamine+morphine increases the risk of side effects to 3.68 times compared to when morphine is prescribed solely (OR=3.68, 95% CI: 1.99 to 6.82, p<0.001). For the first time, findings of the current meta-analysis demonstrated that ketamine, being administered alone, is an effective and safe medication in prehospital pain management in trauma patients, and can be considered as an acceptable alternative to opioid analgesics.

Pre-hospital pain management; a systematic review of proposed guidelines.

A standard guideline concerning pre-hospital pain management is still a matter of discussion. Therefore, the current umbrella review is determined to perform a comprehensive search in databases and Grey literature and collect and summarize the guidelines and protocols dealing with prehospital pain management. In the present study, all of the available guidelines and protocols concerning pre-hospital pain management were reviewed. Presented guidelines are from 2010 up to present, as the majority of guidelines are considered old and become renewed after 10 years. Finally, the development quality of each guideline was evaluated using AGREE II instrument. The search conducted in databases and non-indexed protocols resulted in inclusion of 12 pre-hospital pain management guidelines. The time interval of the guidelines was from 2010 to 2019. Four guidelines were designed for pain management in trauma patients and other guidelines were presented for all of the clinical conditions associated with pain. All of the 12 included guidelines presented pain management instructions in adults. Pain management in children was reported in 10 guidelines. All of the guidelines persisted on a standard method for pain evaluation. Pain management was categorized in three groups; mild, moderate and severe pain. Most of the guidelines recommend paracetamol as an optional treatment for management of mild pain in both adults and children. In management of moderate and severe pain, fentanyl and morphine were suggested for both adults and children. In most of the treatment guidelines fentanyl is the optional choice for children. The present umbrella review has summarized the current evidence in pre-hospital pain management for the first time via investigation of guidelines and protocols related to the matter. Based on the obtained evidence, no guideline is yet presented concerning opioid-free management of moderate and severe pain. The evidence is insufficient for using non opioid medications such as ketamine.

Ketorolac Use for Pain Management in Trauma Patients with Rib Fractures Does Not Increase the Incidence of Bleeding or Acute Kidney Injury

Ketorolac Use for Pain Management in Trauma Patients with Rib Fractures Does Not Increase the Incidence of Bleeding or Acute Kidney Injury

Pain management in trauma patients affected by the opioid epidemic: A narrative review.

Acute and chronic pain in trauma patients remains a challenging entity, particularly in the setting of the escalating opioid epidemic. It has been reported that chronic opioid use increases the likelihood of hospital admissions as a result of traumatic injuries. Furthermore, patients admitted with traumatic injuries have a greater than average risk of developing opioid use disorder after discharge. Practitioners providing care to these patients will encounter the issue of balancing analgesic goals and acute opioid withdrawal with the challenge of reducing postdischarge persistent opioid use. Additionally, the practitioner is faced with the worrisome prospect that inadequate treatment of acute pain may lead to the development of chronic pain and overtreatment may result in opioid dependence. It is therefore imperative to understand and execute alternative nonopioid strategies to maximize the benefits and reduce the risks of analgesic regimens in this patient population. This narrative review will analyze the current literature on pain management in trauma patients and highlight the application of the multimodal approach in potentially reducing the risks of both short- and long-term opioid use. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Narrative review, moderate to High.

Acute pain management in trauma: anatomy, ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve blocks and special considerations.

Pain is the most common complaint amongst trauma patients throughout the perioperative period. Multimodal analgesia is currently being regarded the mainstay, with regional anesthesia techniques constituting an integral part of it. Ultrasound imaging techniques display a plethora of advantages that have pervaded regional anesthesia practice. In this review, we set out to provide several examples of injuries, to elucidate the precise anatomy of fractured bones (osteotomes), and to elaborate on certain peripheral nerve blocks employed in pain management of trauma patients. Controversies/special considerations pertaining to peripheral nerve blocks also dictate thorough analysis: as such, acute compartment syndrome, acute peripheral nerve injuries, regional anesthesia in awake or anesthetized patients, continuous peripheral nerve blocks, positioning limitations and, finally, ultrasound imaging versus neurostimulation techniques are extensively reviewed.