Pain Attitudes And Beliefs Scale Research Articles

Comparison of attitudes and beliefs of physical therapists and primary care physicians regarding low back pain management: A cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: The first-line contact for patients seeking care for low back pain (LBP) can potentially change the disease course. The beliefs and attitudes of healthcare providers (HCPs) can influence LBP management. Although referring patients with LBP to physical therapy is common, the first-line contact for patients with LBP in Saudi Arabia is the primary care physician (PCP). Physical therapy will soon be integrated into primary care; therefore, it is rational to compare physical therapists’ (PTs) beliefs and attitudes regarding LBP with those of PCPs.OBJECTIVE: We compared PCPs’ and PTs’ attitudes and beliefs regarding LBP management.METHODS: We employed a cross-sectional, voluntary response sample research design using the Pain Attitudes and Beliefs Scale (PABS). Participants were PTs and PCPs practicing in Saudi Arabia.RESULTS:In total, 153 participants completed the PABS (111 PTs and 52 PCPs). PCPs demonstrated significantly higher PABS biomedical subscale scores than did the PTs.CONCLUSIONS: HCPs in Saudi Arabia should receive additional training to adopt a biopsychosocial approach to managing LBP. In this study, the HCPs’ treatment recommendations may not correspond with contemporary clinical guidelines. Research to facilitate the implementation of optimal professional education and training to adopt a biopsychosocial approach is an urgent priority.

Low Back Pain Treatment by Athletic Trainers and Athletic Therapists: Biomedical or Biopsychosocial Orientation?

Low back pain (LBP) remains a societal burden due to consistently high rates of recurrence and chronicity. Recent evidence suggested that a provider's treatment orientation influences patient beliefs, the clinical approach, and subsequently, rehabilitation outcomes. To characterize American athletic trainer (AT) and Canadian athletic therapist (C-AT) treatment orientations toward LBP. Cross-sectional study. Online survey. A total of 273 ATs (response rate = 13.3%) and 382 C-ATs (response rate = 15.3%). Participants completed demographic questions and the Pain Attitudes and Beliefs Scale (PABS) for ATs/C-ATs. The PABS measures the biomedical and biopsychosocial treatment orientation of health care providers and is scored on a 6-point Likert scale. Descriptive statistics characterized the participants; t tests and 1-way analyses of variance identified differences between group means; and Spearman correlations assessed relationships between the biomedical and biopsychosocial scores and age, number of LBP patients per year, and years of experience. Athletic trainers treating 9 to 15 LBP patients per year had higher biomedical scores (35.0 ± 5.7) than ATs treating 16 to 34 (31.9 ± 5.5, P = .039) or >34 (31.7 ± 8.6, P = .018) LBP patients per year. The C-ATs treating 16 to 34 (31.8 ± 6.3, P = .038) and >34 (31.0 ± 6.7, P < .001) LBP patients per year had lower biomedical scores than those treating ≤8 LBP patients per year (34.8 ± 5.9). The C-ATs with ≤5 years of experience had higher biomedical scores than those with 10 to 15 (31.0 ± 6.7, P = .011) and 16 to 24 (29.8 ± 7.5, P < .001) years of experience. Canadian athletic therapists treating the general public had higher (31.7 ± 4.0) biopsychosocial scores than ATs treating athletes (31.3 ± 3.5, P = .006). The C-ATs ≤35.6 years of age had higher biomedical scores (33.1 ± 5.9) than those >35.6 years of age (30.5 ± 7.0, P < .001). Athletic trainers and C-ATs who treated more LBP patients per year were more likely to score low on a biomedical treatment orientation subscale. Because this orientation has predicted poor outcomes in other health care providers, further research is needed to determine the effects of ATs' and C-ATs' biomedical orientations on rehabilitation outcomes.

Discriminative Validity of the Pain Attitudes and Beliefs Scale for Physical Therapists.

The Pain Attitudes and Beliefs Scale (PABS) for Physical Therapists aims to measure clinicians' biomedical and biopsychosocial treatment orientations regarding nonspecific low back pain. The objective of this study was to assess whether the PABS can differentiate between subgroups of physical therapists hypothesized to differ in treatment orientations. This study was a cross-sectional survey. The PABS was completed by 662 Norwegian physical therapists with a diversity of professional backgrounds. Twenty-four a priori hypotheses on expected differences in PABS scores were formulated. Sufficient discriminative ability was defined as a minimum of 75% confirmed hypotheses. Hypotheses on differences in scores were tested for the biomedical and biopsychosocial subscales separately as well as for combinations of the 2 subscales, representing responders with high biomedical and low biopsychosocial PABS scores and vice versa. Of the 24 hypotheses, only 15 (62.5%) were confirmed. Between-group differences concerning the separate subscales were small, varying from -0.63 to 1.70 scale points, representing values up to 6.0% of the total subscale ranges. Between-group differences were larger when combined subscales were used, varying from 1.80 to 6.70 points, representing values up to 25.1% of the total subscale ranges. Despite little spread in scores, 24% of respondents demonstrated extreme attitudes. The lack of convincing scientific evidence from previous research on differences in attitudes and beliefs between physical therapists was a limitation for the formulation of hypotheses. Discriminative validity of separate subscales of the PABS was not supported. Combining the 2 subscales into global treatment attitudes enabled better discrimination. Little spread in biomedical and biopsychosocial orientations explains why more than one-third of the hypotheses were not confirmed. Either Norwegian physical therapists are basically similar in their treatment orientation or the PABS is not able to detect any differences between them.

Can a training programme in motivationalinterviewing change musculoskeletalphysiotherapists’ practice?The example of low back pain

Background Low back pain (LBP) is a leading cause of disability nationally and globally, and forms between 40% and 65% of musculoskeletal physiotherapists’ caseloads in the UK. Despite professional expectations to deliver person-centred practice, a biomedical and practitioner-centred perspective continues to dominate within physiotherapy. Many physiotherapists lack the knowledge and skills to deliver psychologically informed practice, which for persistent LBP requires consideration of the needs, preferences and values of the patient. Motivational interviewing (MI) has been recommended as a psychologically informed approach for physiotherapists working with persistent LBP patients, although little research has been carried out into its use. Aim This study aims to investigate the effects of MI training on physiotherapists’ beliefs, attitudes and practice in relation to persistent LBP. Methods A convergent parallel mixed methods study was undertaken. Volunteer musculoskeletal physiotherapists (n=16) were recruited from two musculoskeletal physiotherapy departments within a Community NHS Trust in greater London and allocated to either a MI training Group A (n=10) or a comparison Group B (n=6). The MI training group received an initial two-day MI course followed up by monthly supervision sessions delivered in the workplace. Outcomes were measured pretraining (baseline) then at three and six months later for both groups. Beliefs and attitudes and to persistent low back pain were measured using the Pain Attitudes and Beliefs Scale for Physiotherapists (PABS-PT) and the Health Care Providers Pain and Impairment Relationship Scale (HC-PAIRS). Self-reported proficiency, confidence and intention to use MI were measured using visual analogues scales (VAS). The Motivational Interviewing Training Integrity scale (MITI) generated global ratings and behaviour counts from audio-recordings of initial consultations with persistent LBP patients. The implementation and impact of MI in practice was explored through semi-structured interviews with Group A physiotherapists only at six months. Results A significant post-training decrease in biomedical orientation was demonstrated between the MI training group and the comparison group at three months (HCPAIRS) and six months (PABS-PT and HC-PAIRS) using independent t-tests. The MI training group had significantly increased proficiency, confidence and intention to use MI at three and six months (VAS); and increased MITI global ratings of Spirit (at three months), Collaboration (at three months) and Evocation (at six months). Qualitative content analysis of the semi-structured interviews revealed that the physiotherapists embraced MI as an approach. They were able to overcome initial challenges of putting MI training into practice such as time pressure and level of difficulty in changing ingrained practice and language, and found positive individual and collective ways to introduce and sustain their use of MI. Discussion The results of this study contribute new insights into the understanding of the role and impact of training musculoskeletal physiotherapists in MI, although the small sample size means that the results should be interpreted with caution. MI is acceptable to physiotherapists. Physiotherapists were able to embrace the spirit of MI and to embed MI within their practice. This allows them to development their skills as person-centred practitioners and to cope more effectively with patients perceived as difficult and those with complex presentations. However, ongoing supervision is required to develop MI proficiency, which can be expensive. Mi is acceptable to physiotherapists who seem keen to adopt this psychologically informed approach However, for MI practice to become adopted more widely across the profession, sustainable training approaches and appropriate professional support structures are required.

Item response theory evaluation of the biomedical scale of the Pain Attitudes and Beliefs Scale.

ObjectivesThe assessment of health care professionals’ attitudes and beliefs towards musculoskeletal pain is essential because they are key determinants of their clinical practice behaviour. The Pain Attitudes and Beliefs Scale (PABS) biomedical scale evaluates the degree of health professionals’ biomedical orientation towards musculoskeletal pain and was never assessed using item response theory (IRT). This study aimed at assessing the psychometric performance of the 10-item biomedical scale of the PABS scale using IRT.MethodsTwo cross-sectional samples (BeBack, n = 1016; DABS; n = 958) of health care professionals working in the UK were analysed. Mokken scale analysis (nonparametric IRT) and common factor analysis were used to assess dimensionality of the instrument. Parametric IRT was used to assess model fit, item parameters, and local reliability (measurement precision).ResultsResults were largely similar in the two samples and the scale was found to be unidimensional. The graded response model showed adequate fit, covering a broad range of the measured construct in terms of item difficulty. Item 3 showed some misfit but only in the DABS sample. Some items (i.e. 7, 8 and 9) displayed remarkably higher discrimination parameters than others (4, 5 and 10). The scale showed satisfactory measurement precision (reliability > 0.70) between theta values -2 and +3.DiscussionThe 10-item biomedical scale of the PABS displayed adequate psychometric performance in two large samples of health care professionals, and it is suggested to assess group-level professionals degree of biomedical orientation towards musculoskeletal pain.

Attitude and belief of pain-therapists are important when trying to help chronic pain patients: The Norwegian version of the Pain Attitudes and Beliefs Scale (PABS) improved by Rasch analysis

Attitude and belief of pain-therapists are important when trying to help chronic pain patients: The Norwegian version of the Pain Attitudes and Beliefs Scale (PABS) improved by Rasch analysis

Rasch analysis resulted in an improved Norwegian version of the Pain Attitudes and Beliefs Scale (PABS)

Background and aimThere is evidence that clinicians’ pain attitudes and beliefs are associated with the pain beliefs and illness perceptions of their patients and furthermore influence their recommendations for activity and work to patients with back pain. The Pain Attitudes and Beliefs Scale (PABS) is a questionnaire designed to differentiate between biomedical and biopsychosocial pain attitudes among health care providers regarding common low back pain. The original version had 36 items, and several shorter versions have been developed. Concern has been raised over the PABS’ internal construct validity because of low internal consistency and low explained variance. The aim of this study was to examine and improve the scale's measurement properties and item performance. MethodsA convenience sample of 667 Norwegian physiotherapists provided data for Rasch analysis. The biomedical and biopsychosocial subscales of the PABS were examined for unidimensionality, local response independency, invariance, response category function and targeting of persons and items. Reliability was measured with the person separation index (PSI). Items originally excluded by the developers of the scale because of skewness were re-introduced in a second analysis. ResultsOur analysis suggested that both subscales required removal of several psychometrically redundant and misfitting items to satisfy the requirements of the Rasch measurement model. Most biopsychosocial items needed revision of their scoring structure. Furthermore, we identified two items originally excluded because of skewness that improved the reliability of the subscales after re-introduction. The ultimate result was two strictly unidimensional subscales, each consisting of seven items, with invariant item ordering and free from any form of misfit. The unidimensionality implies that summation of items to valid total scores is justified. Transformation tables are provided to convert raw ordinal scores to unbiased interval-level scores. Both subscales were adequately targeted at the ability level of our physiotherapist population. Reliability of the biomedical subscale as measured with the PSI was 0.69. A low PSI of 0.64 for the biopsychosocial subscale indicated limitations with regard to its discriminative ability. ConclusionsRasch analysis produced an improved Norwegian version of the PABS which represents true (fundamental) measurement of clinicians’ biomedical and biopsychosocial treatment orientation. However, researchers should be aware of the low discriminative ability of the biopsychosocial subscale when analyzing differences and effect changes. ImplicationsThe study presents a revised PABS that provides interval-level measurement of clinicians’ pain beliefs. The revision allows for confident use of parametric statistical analysis. Further examination of discriminative validity is required.

Health care professionals' attitudes and beliefs towards older back pain patients. Analysis of the assessment methods and research gaps

In recent years, the influence of doctors' and therapists' attitudes and beliefs for the treatment of chronic low back pain patients has been increasingly investigated. Attitudes and beliefs of health care providers have been identified as important contributors for an activity based, guideline-oriented therapeutic approach and different questionnaires were developed to evaluate this interaction. Recent reviews discuss the quality of those questionnaires as well as the impact of attitudes towards therapeutic choices and activity recommendations by health care professionals. This article summarizes these results and illuminates transferability of existing questionnaires to older patients with back pain. A literature review shows that most studies were conducted with physiotherapists and general practitioners. At present the most thoroughly investigated tool for its psychometric validity is the Pain Attitudes and Beliefs Scale (PABS). The PABS could be a suitable instrument for examinations regarding therapist attitudes towards older pain patients by using more age-neutral wording. Concluding from the literature, an additional methodological assessment tool could be the utilization of case vignettes. However, those case vignettes, which had been used in studies in England, should be translated and culturally adapted before its application in Germany. Overall, it must be assumed that attitudes and beliefs of clinicians are also important in the care of older patients in pain. With regards to activity recommendations, ageism and the special situation of older people should also be taken into account including possible risk of falling, multimorbidity, polypharmacy, and cognitive impairment. These topics should all be considered in adapted or newly developed questionnaires for the evaluation of attitudes and beliefs of health care providers regarding back pain in older persons.

Attitudes and beliefs about chronic pain among nurses- biomedical or behavioral? A cross-sectional survey

Context:Studies have documented that nurses and other health care professionals are inadequately prepared to care for patients in chronic pain. Several reasons have been identified including inadequacies in nursing education, absence of curriculum content related to pain management, and attitudes and beliefs related to chronic pain.Aims:The objective of this paper was to assess the chronic pain-related attitudes and beliefs among nursing professionals in order to evaluate the biomedical and behavioral dimensions of their perceptions on pain.Settings and Design:Cross-sectional survey of 363 nurses in a multispecialty hospital.Materials and Methods:The study utilized a self-report questionnaire – pain attitudes and beliefs scale (PABS) – which had 31 items (statements about pain) for each of which the person had to indicate the level at which he or she agreed or disagreed with each statement. Factor 1 score indicated a biomedical dimension while factor 2 score indicated a behavioral dimension to pain.Statistical Analysis Used:Comparisons across individual and professional variables for both dimensions were done using one-way ANOVA and correlations were done using the Karl–Pearson co-efficient using SPSS version 11.5 for Windows.Results:The overall factor 1 score was 52.95 ± 10.23 and factor 2 score was 20.93 ± 4.72 (P = 0.00). The female nurses had a higher behavioral dimension score (21.1 ± 4.81) than their male counterparts (19.55 ± 3.67) which was significant at P < 0.05 level.Conclusions:Nurses had a greater orientation toward the biomedical dimension of chronic pain than the behavioral dimension. This difference was more pronounced in female nurses and those nurses who reported very “good” general health had higher behavioral dimension scores than those who had good general health. The study findings have important curricular implications for nurses and practical implications in palliative care.

Pain Attitudes and Beliefs Scale (PABS)

Clinimetrics: The biomedical subscale has been shown to be stable and robust with only minor variation in the composition of the items between studies and with typically high internal consistency (Cronbach’s α 0.73 to 0.84). The behavioural subscale has proved to be more problematic. The different versions that have been developed have largely been attempts to improve the structure of the original behavioural subscale, although internal consistency (Cronbach’s α 0.52 to 0.68) has consistently fallen short of recommended levels (Terwee et al 2007).

General practitioner sickness absence certification for low back pain is not directly associated with beliefs about back pain

Recent research has demonstrated a relationship between healthcare practitioner beliefs about low back pain and recommendations about activity, work restrictions and work absence. None of the research to date has looked at the relationship between practitioner beliefs and actual behaviour. This study investigated the internal consistency of the pain attitudes and beliefs scale (PABS) and if general practitioner (GP) beliefs about back pain were more predictive of sickness certification for non-specific low back pain (NSLBP) than a general predisposition to sick certify patients with other non-specific conditions (common mental illness and non-specific upper respiratory disorders). Ninty-four eligible general practitioners were invited to participate in the study and data from 83 (88.3%) were included in the full analysis. Evaluation of the internal consistency of the PABS found the biomedical subscale was good ( α = 0.781) but the psychosocial subscale was poor ( α = 0.396) after item elimination both subscales improved; biomedical α = 0.790, psychosocial α = 0.602. GP sickness certification behaviour for 1 year was gathered from the Department of Employment and Social Security database. Multiple regression analysis demonstrated that neither the biomedical nor the psychosocial subscale of the PABS predicted the number of sickness certificates issued even after controlling for the time employed as a GP, number of hours worked per week and the number of NSLBP patients seen. Certification for other conditions was predictive of NSLBP certificates issued. These results demonstrate that sickness absences certification for NSLBP is predicted by sickness certification behaviour in general and not by scores on the PABS.