The primary aim of this study was to select a set of relevant biomarkers in feral eel for the biological assessment of inland water pollution. A suite of biochemical parameters in eel (hepatic biotransformation enzymes and cofactors, antioxidant enzymes, PAH metabolites, DNA adducts, serum transaminases) was measured in order to determine their response to xenobiotic compounds in the environment. The results of the analyses of organic trace pollutants in sediments and eel from six Amsterdam freshwater sites with different pollution levels have been discussed in the first part of this paper (Van der Oost, R., Opperhuizen, A., Satumalay, K., Heida, H. and Vermeulen, N.P.E., 1996a. Biomonitoring aquatic pollution with feral eel ( Anguilla anguilla): I. Bioaccumulation: biota-sediment ratios of PCBs, OCPs, PCDDs and PCDFs. Aquat. Toxicol., 35: 21–46). The main conclusions drawn from the trends found for the levels and activities of biochemical parameters in eel were the following: the phase I biotransformation enzymes in eel liver appeared to be the most sensitive to environmental xenobiotics. Cytochrome b 5 (Cyt b 5), cytochrome P450 1A (CYP1A), ethoxyresurofin- O-deethylase (EROD) and EROD turnover (EROD/P450) in eel liver showed significant responses to contamination, and can therefore be used as biomarkers. Levels of a CYP3A-like protein were significantly elevated in eel from three moderately polluted sites, but since this protein was not induced in eel from the most polluted site its relevance as a biomarker remains unclear. Phase II enzymes and cofactors in eel liver were less susceptible to pollutants than phase I enzymes. The activity of UDP glucuronyl transferase (UDPGT) in eel may, however, be a useful biomarker, while glutathione S-transferase (GST) activity and levels of oxidized glutathione (GSSG) were less sensitive. The reduced glutathione (GSH) cofactor levels in eel liver are most probably not reliable as biomarkers. Hepatic activities of antioxidant enzymes (superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT) and GSH-peroxidase (GPOX)) in eel did not show any response to pollution and are therefore not feasible as biomarkers. The level of 1-hydroxypyrene (1-OH pyrene) in eel bile might be a useful biomarker to determine short-term PAH exposure. The hepatic level of DNA adducts in eel liver seems to be a sensitive biomarker for exposure to (and possible effects of) mutagenic and carcinogenic xenobiotics. In feral eel, serum transaminases are not usable as biomarkers of chronic intoxication. The proposed set of the most relevant biomarkers for the assessment of inland water pollution with feral eel thus consists of the following six parameters: cyt b 5, CYP1A, EROD, EROD/P450, UDPGT and DNA adducts.
Read full abstract