Paclitaxel In Ovarian Cancer Patients Research Articles

Comparison of the short-term efficacy and serum markers between lobaplatin/paclitaxel- And carboplatin/paclitaxel-based adjuvant chemotherapy in patient with ovarian cancer.

To compare short-term therapeutic efficacies and related changes of serum markers from two chemotherapeutic regimes using lobaplatin or carboplatin in combination with paclitaxel in ovarian cancer patients after cytoreductive surgery. 120 patients were recruited with pathologically confirmed ovarian cancer. Patients were equally and randomly divided into two groups receiving paclitaxel (PTX) with lobaplatin (LBP) or carboplatin (CBP, as control), respectively, 21days as a cycle for 6 cycles. Follow-up was performed for 6months post-treatment. The therapeutic efficacy, serum levels of CA125 (cancer antigen 125/ mucin 16) and HE4 (Human epididymis protein 4) as well as the quality of life were assessment before and after treatment. No significant difference in therapeutic efficacy was observed between the groups (P>.05). The response rates at 1, 3 and 6months were 76.7%, 66.7% and 46.7% in the LBP group and 73.3%, 63.3% and 36.7% in the CPB group, respectively. At the end of chemotherapy, serum levels of HE4 and CA125 in both groups returned to normal. However, patients in the LBP group had significantly lower HE4 and CA125 levels than those in the CPB group when examined at 3 or 6months after chemotherapy (P<.05). Moreover, at the end of follow-up, the quality-of-life score (QLQ-C30) of the LBP group was better than that of the CBP group with statistical significance (P<.05). Both lobaplatin and carboplatin have decent anti-tumour efficacy to be involved in the standard platinum/paclitaxel-based chemotherapy against ovarian cancer. Lobaplatin, on the other hand, has demonstrated higher efficacy to control the progress of the disease yet less toxicity to warrant better patient quality of life.

Comparison of the Short term Efficacy and Serum Markers between Lobaplatin/Paclitaxel- and Carboplatin/Paclitaxel-based Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Ovarian Cancer

To compare short-term therapeutic efficacies and related changes of serum markers from 2 chemotherapeutic regimes using lobaplatin or carboplatin in combination with paclitaxel in ovarian cancer patients after cytoreductive surgery. 60 patients were recruited with confirmed ovarian cancer. Patients were equally and randomly divided into 2 groups receiving paclitaxel with lobaplatin or carboplatin, respectively. Follow-up was made 6 months post-treatment. The therapeutic efficacy, serum levels of cancer antigen 125/mucin 16 and human epididymis protein 4 as well as the quality-of-life were assessed before and after treatment. No significant difference in therapeutic efficacy was observed between the groups. The response rates at 1, 3 and 6 months were 76.7 % (23/30), 66.7 % (20/30) and 46.7 % (14/30) in the lobaplatin group and 73.3 % (22/30), 63.3 % (19/30), 36.7 % (11/30) in the carboplatin group, respectively. At the end of the chemotherapy, serum levels of human epididymis protein 4 and cancer antigen 125 in both groups returned to normal. However, patients in the lobaplatin group had significantly higher Human epididymis protein 4 and cancer antigen 125 levels than those in the carboplatin group when examined at 3 or 6 month after chemotherapy (p<0.05). Moreover, at the end of follow-up, the quality-of-life score-C30 of the lobaplatin group was better than that of the carboplatin group with statistical significance (p<0.05). Both lobaplatin and carboplatin exert sufficient antitumor efficacy to be included in the standard platinum/paclitaxel-based chemotherapy against ovarian cancer. Lobaplatin, on the other hand, has demonstrated higher efficacy to control the progress of the disease yet less toxicity to warrant better patient quality-of-life.

A new high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for the determination of paclitaxel and 6α-hydroxy-paclitaxel in human plasma: Development, validation and application in a clinical pharmacokinetic study.

Paclitaxel belongs to the taxanes family and it is used, alone or in multidrug regimens, for the therapy of several solid tumours, such as breast-, lung-, head and neck-, and ovarian cancer. Standard dosing of chemotherapy does not take into account the many inter-patient differences that make drug exposure highly variable, thus leading to the insurgence of severe toxicity. This is particularly true for paclitaxel considering that a relationship between haematological toxicity and plasma exposure was found. Therefore, in order to treat patients with the correct dose of paclitaxel, improving the overall benefit–risk ratio, Therapeutic Drug Monitoring is necessary. In order to quantify paclitaxel and its main metabolite, 6α-hydroxy-paclitaxel, in patients’ plasma, we developed a new, sensitive and specific HPLC–MS/MS method applicable to all paclitaxel dosages used in clinical routine. The developed method used a small volume of plasma sample and is based on quick protein precipitation. The chromatographic separation of the analytes was achieved with a SunFire™ C18 column (3.5 μM, 92 Å, 2,1 x 150 mm); the mobile phases were 0.1% formic acid/bidistilled water and 0.1% formic acid/acetonitrile. The electrospray ionization source worked in positive ion mode and the mass spectrometer operated in selected reaction monitoring mode. Our bioanalytical method was successfully validated according to the FDA-EMA guidelines on bioanalytical method validation. The calibration curves resulted linear (R2 ≥0.9948) over the concentration ranges (1–10000 ng/mL for paclitaxel and 1–1000 ng/mL for 6α-hydroxy-paclitaxel) and were characterized by a good accuracy and precision. The intra- and inter-day precision and accuracy were determined on three quality control concentrations for paclitaxel and 6α-hydroxy-paclitaxel and resulted respectively <9.9% and within 91.1–114.8%. In addition, to further verify the assay reproducibility, we tested this method by re-analysing the incurred samples. This bioanalytical method was employed with success to a genotype-guided phase Ib study of weekly paclitaxel in ovarian cancer patients treated with a wide range of drug’s dosages.

Pharmacogenetic Studies of Paclitaxel in the Treatment of Ovarian Cancer

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of sequence variants in the CYP2C8, ABCB1 and CYP3A4 genes and the CYP3A4 phenotype for the pharmacokinetics and toxicity of paclitaxel in ovarian cancer patients. Thirty-eight patients were treated with paclitaxel and carboplatin. The genotypes of CYP2C8*1B, *1C, *2, *3, *4, *5, *6, *7, *8 and P404A, ABCB1 G2677T/A and C3435T, as well as CYP3A4*1B, were determined by pyrosequencing. Phenotyping of CYP3A4 was performed in vivo with quinine as a probe. The patients were monitored for toxicity and 23 patients underwent a more extensive neurotoxicity evaluation. Patients heterozygous for G/A in position 2677 in ABCB1 had a significantly higher clearance of paclitaxel than most other ABCB1 variants. A lower clearance of paclitaxel was found for patients heterozygous for CYP2C8*3 when stratified according to the ABCB1 G2677T/A genotype. In addition, the CYP3A4 enzyme activity in vivo affected which metabolic pathway was dominant in each patient, but not the total clearance of paclitaxel. The exposure to paclitaxel correlated to the degree of neurotoxicity. Our findings suggest that interindividual variability in paclitaxel pharmacokinetics might be predicted by ABCB1 and CYP2C8 genotypes and provide useful information for individualized chemotherapy.

Pharmacokinetics of Paclitaxel in Ovarian Cancer Patients and Genetic Polymorphisms of CYP2C8, CYP3A4, and MDR1

Interindividual differences in the pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel and its metabolites in Japanese ovarian cancer patients were investigated in relation to genetic polymorphisms of the CYP2C8, CYP3A4, and MDR1 genes. The area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) ratios of paclitaxel/6alpha-hydroxypaclitaxel and paclitaxel/3 -p-hydroxypaclitaxel calculated as the metabolic index of CYP2C8 and CYP3A4 showed 13- and 12-fold interindividual variations, respectively. No patient had any CYP2C8 variants, while 2 patients were heterozygotes of CYP3A4*16. For the MDR1 gene, the frequencies of -129C, 1236C, 2677T, 2677A, and 3435T alleles were 2.2%, 8.7%, 56.5%, 4.4%, and 52.2%, respectively. Subjects possessing the 3435T allele had a significantly (P < .05) higher AUC of 3'- p-hydroxypaclitaxel compared to those possessing the 3435C allele. Leukocytopenia was significantly (P < .05) related to the AUC of paclitaxel. Genotyping of the CYP2C8, CYP3A4, and MDR1 genes might not be essential to predict adverse effects of paclitaxel in Japanese patients, although an allelic variant of MDR1 may functionally affect the pharmacokinetics of its metabolite.