P2P Data Integration Research Articles

Lightweight privacy-preserving peer-to-peer data integration

Peer Data Management Systems (PDMS) are an attractive solution for managing distributed heterogeneous information. When a peer (client) requests data from another peer (server) with a different schema, translations of the query and its answer are done by a sequence of intermediate peers (translators). There are two privacy issues in this P2P data integration process: (i) answer privacy: no unauthorized parties (including the translators) should learn the query result; (ii) mapping privacy: the schema and the value mappings used by the translators to perform the translation should not be revealed to other peers. Elmeleegy and Ouzzani proposed the PPP protocol that is the first to support privacy-preserving querying in PDMS. However, PPP suffers from several shortcomings. First, PPP does not satisfy the requirement of answer privacy, because it is based on commutative encryption; we show that this issue can be fixed by adopting another cryptographic technique called oblivious transfer. Second, PPP adopts a weaker notion for mapping privacy, which allows the client peer to observe certain mappings done by translators. In this paper, we develop a lightweight protocol, which satisfies mapping privacy and extend it to a more complex one that facilitates parallel translation by peers. Furthermore, we consider a stronger adversary model where there may be collusions among peers and propose an efficient protocol that guards against collusions. We conduct an experimental study on the performance of the proposed protocols using both real and synthetic data. The results show that the proposed protocols not only achieve a better privacy guarantee than PPP, but they are also more efficient.

SDDG: a P2P-Semantic-Grid Enabled Information Sharing Infrastructure

SDDG (semantic desktop data grid) is a novel semantic peer-to-peer architecture built on top of previous work [1][2] to fully leverage the enterprise information resides in both enterprise and personal information sources. In SDDG, the combination of P2P data integration paradigm, semantic integration principle and grid service oriented framework provides both the required level of flexibility and scalability, and the high interoperability on information and semantic level. The semantic P2P model of SDDG is discussed in detail from the aspects of the definition of peer node, the master-slave P2P mapping mechanism, the classified P2P query. A semantic service oriented implementation framework based on OGSADAI is also discussed in this paper.

Schema Mappings and Agents' Actions in P2P Data Integration System

Schema Mappings and Agents' Actions in P2P Data Integration System

Inconsistency tolerance in P2P data integration: An epistemic logic approach

We study peer-to-peer ( P 2 P ) data integration, where each peer models an autonomous system that exports data in terms of its own schema, and data interoperation is achieved by means of mappings among the peer schemas, rather than through a unique global schema. We propose a multi-modal epistemic logical formalization based on the idea that each peer is conceived as a rational agent that exchanges knowledge/belief with other peers, thus nicely modeling the modular structure of the system. We then address the issue of dealing with possible inconsistencies, and distinguish between two types of inconsistencies, called local and P2P, respectively. We define a nonmonotonic extension of our logic that is able to reason on the beliefs of peers under both local and P2P inconsistency tolerance. Tolerance to local inconsistency essentially means that the presence of inconsistency within one peer does not affect the consistency of the whole system. Tolerance to P2P inconsistency means being able to resolve inconsistencies arising from the interaction between peers. We study query answering in the new nonmonotonic logic, with the main goal of establishing its decidability and its computational complexity. Indeed, we show that, under reasonable assumptions on peer schemas, query answering is decidable, and is coNP-complete with respect to data complexity, i.e., the size of the data stored at the peers.