P1 Promoter Region Research Articles

Carbazole Derivatives Binding to Bcl-2 Promoter Sequence G-quadruplex.

In this study, we used ultraviolet-visible (UV-Vis), fluorescence, and circular dichroism (CD) techniques, as well as molecular modeling, to probe the interactions between carbazole derivatives and the G-quadruplex structure formed in the promoter region of gene Bcl-2. This gene is a rational target for anticancer therapy due to its high expression in a variety of tumors as well as resistance to chemotherapy-induced apoptosis. We employed a sequence with a specific dual G-to-T mutation that may form a mixed-type hybrid G-quadruplex structure in the Bcl-2 P1 promoter region. The three tested carbazole compounds differing in substitution on the nitrogen atom of carbazole interact with the Bcl-2 G-quadruplex by the same binding mode with the very comparable binding affinities in the order of 105 M-1. During absorption and fluorescence measurements, large changes in the ligand spectra were observed at higher G4 concentrations. The spectrophotometric titration results showed a two-step complex formation between the ligands and the G-quadruplex in the form of initial hypochromicity followed by hyperchromicity with a bathochromic shift. The strong fluorescence enhancement of ligands was observed after binding to the DNA. All of the used analytical techniques, as well as molecular modeling, suggested the π-π interaction between carbazole ligands and a guanine tetrad of the Bcl-2 G-quadruplex. Molecular modeling has shown differences in the interaction between each of the ligands and the tested G-quadruplex, which potentially had an impact on the binding strength.

MT1G Regulates c-MYC/P53 Signal to Inhibit Proliferation, Invasion and Migration and Promote Apoptosis in Colon Cancer Cells.

Colon cancer is a common and malignant cancer featuring high morbidity and poor prognosis. This study was performed to explore the regulatory role of MT1G in colon cancer as well as its unconcealed molecular mechanism. The expressions of MT1G, c-MYC, and p53 were assessed with the application of RT-qPCR and western blot. The impacts of MT1G overexpression on the proliferative ability of HCT116 and LoVo cells were measured by CCK-8 and BrdU incorporation assays. Additionally, transwell wound healing, and flow cytometry assays were employed to evaluate the invasive and migrative capacities as well as the apoptosis level of HCT116 and LoVo cells. Moreover, the activity of the P53 promoter region was assessed with the help of a luciferase reporter assay. It was found that the expressions of MT1G at both mRNA and protein levels were greatly decreased in human colon cancer cell lines, particularly in HCT116 and LoVo cell lines. After transfection, it was discovered that the MT1G overexpression suppressed the proliferation, migration and invasion but promoted the apoptosis of HCT116 and LoVo cells, which were then partially reversed after overexpressing c-MYC. Additionally, MT1G overexpression reduced c-MYC expression but enhanced the p53 expression, revealing that the MT1G overexpression could regulate c-MYC/P53 signal. Elsewhere, it was also shown that c-MYC overexpression suppressed the regulatory effects of MT1G on P53. To conclude, MT1G was verified to regulate c-MYC/P53 signal to repress the proliferation, migration and invasion but promote the apoptosis of colon cancer cells, which might offer a novel targeted-therapy for the improvement of colon cancer.

RUNX1 Isoforms Regulate RUNX1 and Target-Genes Differentially in Platelets/Megakaryocytes: Association with Clinical Cardiovascular Events

RUNX1 is an essential transcription factor for hematopoiesis. Germline RUNX1 haplodeficiency is associated with thrombocytopenia, platelet dysfunction and predisposition to myeloid malignancies. Three major RUNX1 isoforms (A, B and C) are recognized and share a DNA binding RUNT domain; RUNX1A lacks the transactivation domain. Two distinct promoters regulate RUNX1 expression: distal P1 regulates RUNX1C; proximal P2 regulates RUNX1B and RUNX1A. Little is known regarding the differential effects of isoforms in RUNX1 autoregulation, target-gene regulation and association with clinical events. We performed studies in megakaryocytic HEL cells, HeLa cells (which do not express RUNX1) and in platelets of healthy subjects (n=74) and provide evidence for isoform-specific differential autoregulation and target-gene regulation by RUNX1. We show an association between expression of specific RUNX1-regulated genes in whole blood with cardiovascular events in patients. There are 5 RUNX1 consensus binding sites in P1 promoter and 1 in P2 promoter within ~1000 bp from ATG. Wild type RUNX1 P1 and P2 promoter regions were individually cloned into PGL4 luciferase promoter vector. ChIP studies using PMA-treated megakaryocytic HEL cells showed RUNX1 binding to chromatin regions encompassing the RUNX1 binding sites in both promoters. Mutations of 2 RUNX1 binding sites in intron region of P1 promoter reduced promoter activity; mutations of first 2 RUNX1 binding sites at the exon region of P1 promoter increased activity. Mutation of single RUNX1 binding site in P2 promoter increased promoter activity. Thus, RUNX1 binds to P1 and P2 promoters to regulate activities. To examine the RUNX1 autoregulation by individual isoforms, we co-transfected each isoform with P1 or P2 promoter vector in HeLa cells, which do not express endogenous RUNX1. In response to RUNX1B over-expression, both P1 and P2 promoters showed a dose-dependent decrease in promoter activity. RUNX1C over-expression increased P1 and P2 promoter activities. Thus, RUNX1B and RUNX1C regulate P1 and P2 promoters differentially. In HEL cells, which have endogenous RUNX1, RUNX1B overexpression decreased RUNX1C and RUNX1A mRNA/protein expression by ~50%. RUNX1C overexpression increased RUNX1B and RUNX1A mRNA/protein expression. Thus, RUNX1B decreases RUNX1C and RUNX1A expression; RUNX1C increases RUNX1B and RUNX1A. We studied the regulation by RUNX1 isoforms of target genes PCTP (phosphatidylcholine transfer protein), MYL9 (myosin light chain), PDE5A (phosphodiesterase 5A) and F13A (factor XIIIA) . In HeLa cells. RUNX1B overexpression increased PCTP, MYL9 and PDE5A (protein and mRNA); RUNX1C overexpression reduced PCTP and MYL9. In HEL cells RUNX1B increased PCTP, MYL9, PDE5A and F13A expression; RUNX1C reduced PCTP and MYL9 expression. To obtain evidence in vivo, we studied the relationships between RUNX1 isoforms and their relationships to RUNX1-target genes by RNAseq in leukocyte-poor platelets (74 healthy donors; ages 30-75 yrs). RUNX1B correlated negatively with RUNX1C (R= -0.413 and p=1.5e-06) and RUNX1A (R= -0.493 and p=0.00e+oo); RUNX1C correlated positively with RUNX1A (R=0.45, p<0.0001). RUNX1B correlated positively with PCTP, F131A, PDE5A and RAB1B, and negatively with MYL9 (Figure 1); no significant relationships were observed with RUNX1C or RUNX1A. To understand the relationships to cardiovascular events (MI or death), we explored whole blood gene expression using microarrays in 587 patients (2 cohorts, 190 and 397 patients) presenting to cardiac catherization for chest pain and followed for 3.8 years. In our previous studies RUNX1B transcripts were higher and RUNX1C lower in those with MI or death. We now found that higher expressions of F13A1(Figure 2) and RAB31, which have been shown by us to be RUNX1-targets, were associated with cardiovascular events. Conclusions: RUNX1 isoforms autoregulate RUNX1 expression differentially and regulate target genes in a differential manner, a pattern consistent with in vivo platelet gene expression. The relative expression of RUNX1B and RUNX1C isoforms and of their target genes associate with clinical cardiovascular events. RUNX1-isoform specific effects need to be considered in clinical scenarios where RUNX1 is involved and in its pharmacologic modulation.

Tumor- and metastasis-promoting roles of miR-488 inhibition via HULC enhancement and EZH2-mediated p53 repression in gastric cancer.

Dysregulation of microRNAs (miRNAs or miRs) is implicated in the development of gastric cancer (GC), which is possibly related to their roles in targeting tumor-suppressive or tumor-promoting genes. Herein, the current study was intended to ascertain the function of miR-488 and its modulatory mechanism in GC. Initially, human GC cells were assayed for their in vitro malignancy after miRNA gain- or loss-of-function and RNA interference or overexpression. Also, tumorigenesis and liver metastasis were evaluated in nude mouse models. Results demonstrated that miR-488 elevation suppressed GC (MKN-45 and OCUM-1) cell proliferation, migration, and invasiveness in vitro and reduced their tumorigenesis and liver metastasis in vivo. The luciferase assay identified that miR-488 bound to HULC and inhibited its expression. Furthermore, HULC could enhance EZH2-H3K27me3 enrichment at the p53 promoter region and epigenetically repress the p53 expression based on the data from RIP- and ChIP-qPCR assay. Additionally, HULC was validated to enhance GC growth and metastasis in vitro and in vivo. Overall, HULC re-expression elicited by miR-488 inhibition can enhance EZH2-H3K27me3 enrichment in the p53 promoter and repress the p53 expression, thus promoting the growth and metastasis of GC.

Differential RUNX1-Isoform Specific Autoregulation of RUNX1 and Regulation of Target Genes (PCTP, MYL9) in Megakaryocytic Cells

RUNX1 is an essential transcription factor for hematopoiesis. Human germline RUNX1 haplodeficiency is associated with impaired megakaryocyte differentiation, thrombocytopenia, platelet dysfunction and predisposition to myeloid malignancies. The two major RUNX1 isoforms RUNX1C and RUNX1B differ at N-terminus by 14AA, and are regulated by two distinct promoters P1 and P2, respectively. RUNX1B and RUNX1C have distinct roles and tissue expression. Little is known regarding the differential effects of RUNX1 isoforms in RUNX1 autoregulation, and on their regulation of target genes. There are 5 RUNX1 consensus binding sites located in P1 promoter and one RUNX1 site in P2 promoter. To study RUNX1 promoters, both WT RUNX1 P1 and P2 promoter regions were individually cloned into PGL4 luciferase promoter vector. ChIP studies using PMA-treated megakaryocytic HEL cells showed RUNX1 binding to chromatin regions encompassing the RUNX1 binding sites in both promoters. Mutations of 2 RUNX1 binding sites in intron region of P1 promoter reduced promoter activity; mutations of first 2 RUNX1 binding sites in at the exon region of P1 promoter increased activity. Mutation of single RUNX1 binding site in P2 promoter increased promoter activity. Thus, RUNX1 binds to P1 and P2 promoters to regulate their activities. To examine the RUNX1 autoregulation by individual isoforms, we co-transfected each isoform with P1 or P2 promoter vector in HeLa cells, which express negligible endogenous RUNX1. In response to RUNX1B, P1 promoter showed a dose-dependent decrease in promoter activity. RUNX1C expression, increased P1 promoter activity in a dose-dependent manner. With constant RUNX1C expression, increase in RUNX1B co-expression led to a dose-dependent decrease in P1 promoter activity. In HeLa cells RUNX1B decreased P2 promoter activity in a dose-dependent manner. With constant RUNX1B expression, an increase in RUNX1C increased RUNX1 P2 promoter activity. Thus, RUNX1B and RUNX1C regulate both P1 and P2 promoters in a distinct manner. In studies in megakaryocytic HEL cells, which express endogenous RUNX1, RUNX1B overexpression decreased RUNX1C expression by 50%. RUNX1C overexpression increased by 2-fold RUNX1B protein. In studies using RUNX1C-specific antibody, and expression plasmids for hemagglutinin-tagged-RUNX1B and c-Myc-tagged RUNX1C, RUNX1B overexpression decreased RUNX1C; RUNX1C overexpression increased RUNX1B. These studies indicate that RUNX1 isoforms autoregulate in a differential manner at the protein level. We studied the effects of RUNX1 isoforms on two established downstream RUNX1 target genes PCTP (phosphatidylcholine transfer protein) and MYL9(myosin light chain) in HeLa cells. RUNX1B overexpression increased both PCTP and MYL9 protein on immunoblotting, while RUNX1C overexpression reduced both proteins. This suggests RUNX1B and RUNX1C have differential effects in regulating downstream genes. These findings are in line with our studies in whole blood from a large cohort of patients with CAD showing a positive correlation between PCTP (Circulation 2017136(10):927-939) with RUNX1B transcript levels and a negative relationship with those for RUNX1C. Conclusions: RUNX1 isoforms autoregulate RUNX1 expression differentially in an isoform-specific manner. Moreover, they regulate target genes (MYL9 and PCTP) in a differential manner. These RUNX1 isoform-specific effects may be important in understanding the consequences of germline RUNX1 haplodeficiency and in modulating RUNX1 levels for therapeutic purposes.

Associations between DNA methylation and genotoxicity among lead-exposed workers in China

Studies have shown that lead (Pb) exposure caused genotoxicity, however, the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. A mechanism may be via DNA methylation which is one of the most widely studied epigenetic regulations for cellular activities. Whether this is involved in Pb-induced genotoxicity has rarely been studied. Our study aimed to examine whether DNA methylation was associated with Pb exposure and genotoxicity, and to explore its potential mediating roles. A total of 250 Pb-exposed workers were enrolled. Blood lead levels (BLLs) and genotoxic biomarkers (Micronuclei and Comet) were analyzed. Methylation levels at CpG sites of LINE1 and Alu and promoter region of P53, BRCA1, TRIM36 and OGG1 were measured by pyrosequencing. Generalized linear model (GLM) combined with restricted cubic splines (RCS) were used to analyze relationships between Pb exposure, DNA methylation and genotoxicity. Mediation effect was used to explore mediating roles of DNA methylation. The distribution of BLLs was right-skewed and showed wide ranges from 23.7 to 636.2 μg/L with median (P25, P75) being 218.4 (106.1, 313.9) μg/L among all workers. Micronuclei frequencies showed Poisson distribution [1.94 ± 1.88‰] and Comet tail intensity showed normal distribution [1.69 ± 0.93%]. GLM combined with RCS showed that Alu methylation was negatively associated with BLLs, while P53 and OGG1 methylation were positively associated with BLLs. Micronuclei were negatively associated with Alu and TRIM36 methylation but positively with P53 methylation. Comet was positively associated with P53 and BRCA1 methylation. Mediation effect showed that Alu methylation mediated 7% effects on association between Pb exposure and micronuclei, whereas, P53 methylation mediated 14% and BRCA1 mediated 9% effects on association between Pb exposure and Comet. Our data show that Pb exposure induced changes of global and gene-specific DNA methylation which mediated Pb-induced genotoxicity.

Complex chromosomal rearrangements induced by transposons in maize.

Eukaryotic genomes are large and complex, and gene expression can be affected by multiple regulatory elements and their positions within the dynamic chromatin architecture. Transposable elements are known to play important roles in genome evolution, yet questions remain as to how transposable elements alter genome structure and affect gene expression. Previous studies have shown that genome rearrangements can be induced by Reversed Ends Transposition involving termini of Activator and related transposable elements in maize and other plants. Here, we show that complex alleles can be formed by the rapid and progressive accumulation of Activator-induced duplications and rearrangements. The p1 gene enhancer in maize can induce ectopic expression of the nearby p2 gene in pericarp tissue when placed near it via different structural rearrangements. By screening for p2 expression, we identified and studied 5 cases in which multiple sequential transposition events occurred and increased the p1 enhancer copy number. We see active p2 expression due to multiple copies of the p1 enhancer present near p2 in all 5 cases. The p1 enhancer effects are confirmed by the observation that loss of p2 expression is correlated with transposition-induced excision of the p1 enhancers. We also performed a targeted Chromosome Conformation Capture experiment to test the physical interaction between the p1 enhancer and p2 promoter region. Together, our results show that transposon-induced rearrangements can accumulate rapidly and progressively increase genetic variation important for genomic evolution.

Structural basis for p53 binding to its nucleosomal target DNA sequence.

The tumor suppressor p53 functions as a pioneer transcription factor that binds a nucleosomal target DNA sequence. However, the mechanism by which p53 binds to its target DNA in the nucleosome remains elusive. Here we report the cryo-electron microscopy structures of the p53 DNA-binding domain and the full-length p53 protein complexed with a nucleosome containing the 20 base-pair target DNA sequence of p53 (p53BS). In the p53-nucleosome structures, the p53 DNA-binding domain forms a tetramer and specifically binds to the p53BS DNA, located near the entry/exit region of the nucleosome. The nucleosomal position of the p53BS DNA is within the genomic p21 promoter region. The p53 binding peels the DNA from the histone surface, and drastically changes the DNA path around the p53BS on the nucleosome. The C-terminal domain of p53 also binds to the DNA around the center and linker DNA regions of the nucleosome, as revealed by hydroxyl radical footprinting. These results provide important structural information for understanding the mechanism by which p53 binds the nucleosome and changes the chromatin structure for gene activation.

FOXL2 and FOXA1 cooperatively assemble on the TP53 promoter in alternative dimer configurations.

Although both the p53 and forkhead box (FOX) family proteins are key transcription factors associated with cancer progression, their direct relationship is unknown. Here, we found that FOX family proteins bind to the non-canonical homotypic cluster of the p53 promoter region (TP53). Analysis of crystal structures of FOX proteins (FOXL2 and FOXA1) bound to the p53 homotypic cluster indicated that they interact with a 2:1 stoichiometry accommodated by FOX-induced DNA allostery. In particular, FOX proteins exhibited distinct dimerization patterns in recognition of the same p53-DNA; dimer formation of FOXA1 involved protein–protein interaction, but FOXL2 did not. Biochemical and biological functional analyses confirmed the cooperative binding of FOX proteins to the TP53 promoter for the transcriptional activation of TP53. In addition, up-regulation of TP53 was necessary for FOX proteins to exhibit anti-proliferative activity in cancer cells. These analyses reveal the presence of a discrete characteristic within FOX family proteins in which FOX proteins regulate the transcription activity of the p53 tumor suppressor via cooperative binding to the TP53 promoter in alternative dimer configurations.

HPV16 E6-Activated OCT4 Promotes Cervical Cancer Progression by Suppressing p53 Expression via Co-Repressor NCOR1.

Human papillomaviruses (HPV), mainly HPV16 and HPV18, of high-risk classification are involved in cervical cancer carcinogenesis and progression. Octamer-binding transcription factor 4 (OCT4) is a key transcription factor that is increased in various cancer types. Cervical cancer patients with higher levels of OCT4 had worse survival rates. However, the definite mechanisms underlying its function in the development of cervical cancer still remain to be explicated. Here, our study demonstrated that OCT4 expression was slightly increased in cervical cancer tissues than in precancerous ones. However, OCT4 was significantly upregulated in HPV16-positive tissues, in contrast to the expression profiling for p53. Moreover, knockdown of HPV16 E6 in SiHa cells suppressed the expression of OCT4 with impaired activities of cell proliferation, migration, and invasion, while it recovered the expression of p53. Overexpression of OCT4 and p53 exerted opposite roles on cell proliferation, migration, invasion, and colony formation of cervical cancer cells. More importantly, the enforced expression of OCT4 augmented p53-inhibited cell migration, invasion, and colony formation in human cervical cancer by promoting EMT. Finally, we identified that OCT4 could bind to the p53 promoter region to repress p53 expression by recruiting co-repressor NCOR1 using luciferase, ChIP, and co-IP experiments. We further illustrated that OCT4 not only increased the lung metastasis of cervical cancer but also effectively reversed p53-inhibited lung metastasis. In conclusion, our results suggested that HPV16 E6 activated the expression of OCT4 and subsequently crippled the transcription of p53 via co-repressor NCOR1, which contributed to cervical cancer progression.

Deoxyelephantopin Suppresses Pancreatic Cancer Progression In Vitro and In Vivo by Targeting linc00511/miR-370-5p/p21 Promoter Axis.

Objectives Deoxyelephantopin (DET) is a kind of natural active ingredient extracted from the Chinese herbal medicine Elephantopus scaber L. Many studies have revealed the potential antitumor effect on multiple malignancies. However, the detailed mechanism of its antitumor effect in pancreatic cancer remains unclear. Recently, studies have confirmed that noncoding RNA (ncRNA) plays an important regulatory role in malignancies. This research was performed to explore the relationship between ncRNA and DET-induced tumor inhibition in pancreatic cancer. Methods Microarray profiling was applied to identify the candidate ncRNAs associated with DET-induced tumor inhibition. Quantitative real-time PCR was used to evaluate the expression of linc00511 in pancreatic cancer cells and tissues. The influence of DET on the cell proliferation, migration, and invasion was assessed by CCK-8, colony formation, wound healing, and Transwell assays. The relationship between lncRNAs, miRNAs, and p21 promoter region was analyzed by bioinformatics and verified by luciferase reporter gene and western blotting. The effect of linc00511 on nuclear translocation of miR-370-5p was explored by cytoplasmic and nuclear RNA purification. Moreover, the effect of DET on tumor growth and metastasis, and the prophylactic effect were investigated by establishing subcutaneous and lung metastatic tumor models. Results Microarray assay indicated linc00511 was a potential target gene. The antitumor effect of DET in pancreatic cancer depended on downregulating linc00511 expression, and linc00511 might be an oncogene in pancreatic cancer. Silencing linc00511 enhanced the antitumor function of DET; conversely, linc00511 overexpression antagonized the DET cytotoxic effect. Additionally, miR-370-5p could bind to p21 promoter to exert the RNA activation and then promote p21 expression. P21 was a downstream gene of linc00511 and associated with pancreatic cancer progression. Linc00511 regulated p21 expression by blocking miR-370-5p nuclear translocation. Conclusions To sum up, the present finding confirmed that DET suppressed the malignant biological behavior of pancreatic cancer via linc00511/miR-370-5p/p21 promoter axis.

Paired box 5 increases the chemosensitivity of esophageal squamous cell cancer cells by promoting p53 signaling activity.

Background:Gene promoter methylation is a major epigenetic change in cancers, which plays critical roles in carcinogenesis. As a crucial regulator in the early stages of B-cell differentiation and embryonic neurodevelopment, the paired box 5 (PAX5) gene is downregulated by methylation in several kinds of tumors and the role of this downregulation in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) pathogenesis remains unclear.Methods:To elucidate the role of PAX5 in ESCC, eight ESCC cell lines, 51 primary ESCC tissue samples, and eight normal esophageal mucosa samples were studied and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) was queried. PAX5 expression was examined by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction and western blotting. Cell apoptosis, proliferation, and chemosensitivity were detected by flow cytometry, colony formation assays, and 3-(4,5-dimethyl-2-thiazolyl)-2,5-diphenyl-2-H-tetrazolium bromide assays in ESCC cell lines with PAX5 overexpression or silencing. Tumor xenograft models were established for in vivo verification.Results:PAX5 methylation was found in 37.3% (19/51) of primary ESCC samples, which was significantly associated with age (P = 0.007) and tumor-node-metastasis stage (P = 0.014). TCGA data analysis indicated that PAX5 expression was inversely correlated with promoter region methylation (r = −0.189, P = 0.011 for cg00464519 and r = −0.228, P = 0.002 for cg02538199). Restoration of PAX5 expression suppressed cell proliferation, promoted apoptosis, and inhibited tumor growth of ESCC cell lines, which was verified in xenografted mice. Ectopic PAX5 expression significantly increased p53 reporter luciferase activity and increased p53 messenger RNA and protein levels. A direct interaction of PAX5 with the p53 promoter region was confirmed by chromatin immunoprecipitation assays. Re-expression of PAX5 sensitized ESCC cell lines KYSE150 and KYSE30 to fluorouracil and docetaxel. Silencing of PAX5 induced resistance of KYSE450 cells to these drugs.Conclusions:As a tumor suppressor gene regulated by promoter region methylation in human ESCC, PAX5 inhibits proliferation, promotes apoptosis, and induces activation of p53 signaling. PAX5 may serve as a chemosensitive marker of ESCC.

HOXC10 indicates poor survival outcome in gastric cancer and promotes G1/S cell cycle transition through transcriptional repression of p21.

Homeobox (HOX) genes encode proteins that function as transcription factors during embryogenesis and tumorigenesis. We have previously reported upregulation of HOXC10 in gastric cancer (GC) tissues using cDNA microarray analysis. Though the functional role of HOXC10 in GC has been briefly reported, its specific mechanism is not fully understood. We analyzed the expression of HOXC10 in GC tissues, as well as its correlation with the survival outcome. By in vitro and in vivo assays, we further investigated the role of HOXC10 on cell cycle control and proliferation. Finally, we screened potential downstream targets of HOXC10 by cDNA microarray and explored the role of HOXC10 in p21 transcriptional repression through a dual luciferase reporter and chromatin immunoprecipitation. We illustrated the upregulation of HOXC10 in GC tissues and high HOXC10 expression related to poor survival outcome. Multivariable COX regression analysis showed that HOXC10 was an independent predictor of survival (HR=1.863; 95% CI: 1.076-3.225). Functionally, HOXC10 could promote GC cell proliferation and tumor growth in nude mice. Overexpression of HOXC10 accelerated G1/S cell cycle transition, whereas knocking down HOXC10 induced cell cycle arrest at the G1 phase. Critical factors of G1/S cell cycle transition including p21, CDK2, and c-Myc, were regulated by HOXC10. Importantly, an inverse correlation between p21 and HOXC10 expression in GC cell lines and tissues was observed. HOXC10 could directly bind to the promoter region of p21 and repress its transcriptional activity. Collectively, we identified HOXC10 as a predictor of poor prognosis in GC patients, and a novel transcriptional regulator of p21 in the G1/S cell cycle transition.

A pilot study on DNA hypermethylation status in promoter region of P16 gene in patients with sporadic breast cancer

BackgroundEpigenetic modification of cancer-related genes plays a role over and above their genetic alterations and contributes to the tumor initiation and progression of breast cancer. Promoter methylation of tumor suppressor genes is one such epigenetic modification, which can be potential biomarker. In this study, promoter methylation status of p16 gene was studied in blood samples of patients with breast carcinoma. MethodsSeventy-five patients, freshly diagnosed with carcinoma of breast and 20 age and sex matched healthy control subjects were recruited for the study. DNA extracted from EDTA blood sample was bisulfite converted and subjected to methylation-specific PCR to amplify the p16 promoter region. ResultsOut of 75 patients, 25 (33%) patients showed hypermethylation in promoter region of p16 gene, which was statistically significant in comparison with the control group (p < 0.05). In subgroup analysis, lymph node involvement, cancer grade, and histopathological finding did not show any difference with methylation status of p16 promoter. ConclusionSignificant hypermethylation of p16 promoter region in the blood of histopathologically proven cases of breast cancer was observed suggesting promoter hypermethylation of p16 may be a possible mechanism accounting for sporadic carcinoma of breast.

P300/Sp1-Mediated High Expression of p16 Promotes Endothelial Progenitor Cell Senescence Leading to the Occurrence of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Objective Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common chronic disease and develops rapidly into a grave public health problem worldwide. However, what exactly causes the occurrence of COPD remains largely unclear. Here, we are trying to explore whether the high expression of p16 mediated by p300/Sp1 can cause chronic obstructive pulmonary disease through promoting the senescence of endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs). Methods Peripheral blood EPCs were isolated from nonsmoking non-COPD, smoking non-COPD, and smoking COPD patients. The expressions of p16, p300, and senescence-related genes were detected by RT-PCR and Western Blot. Then, we knocked down or overexpressed Sp1 and p300 and used the ChIP assay to detect the histone H4 acetylation level in the promoter region of p16, CCK8 to detect cell proliferation, flow cytometry to detect the cell cycle, and β-galactosidase staining to count the proportion of senescent cells. Results The high expression of p16 was found in peripheral blood EPCs of COPD patients; the cigarette smoke extract (CSE) led to the increase of p16. The high expression of p16 in EPCs promoted cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. The CSE-mediated high expression of p16 promoted cell senescence. The expression of p300 was increased in peripheral blood EPCs of COPD patients. Moreover, p300/Sp1 enhanced the histone H4 acetylation level in the promoter region of p16, thereby mediating the senescence of EPCs. And knockdown of p300/Sp1 could rescue CSE-mediated cell senescence. Conclusion p300/Sp1 enhanced the histone H4 acetylation level in the p16 promoter region to mediate the senescence of EPCs.

Potency of miR-144-3p in promoting abdominal aortic aneurysm progression in mice correlates with apoptosis of smooth muscle cells

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), a life-threatening disease, is commonly diagnosed among people with risk factors, including increasing age, male gender, and smoking. The apoptosis of smooth muscle cells (SMCs) has been reported to disrupt the vascular structural integrity, which causes AAA. Thus, we sought to characterize the potential role of microRNA (miR)-144-3p in SMC apoptosis, and to outline the molecular mechanisms involved in this pathway. We collected pathological abdominal aortic tissues and adjacent normal aortic biopsy specimens from 18 patients undergoing AAA repair surgery. The relationship between miR-144-3p expression and SMC proliferation was assessed by transfecting mimic/inhibitor of miR-144-3p in human aortic smooth muscle cells (HASMCs). Anti-growth effect of miR-144-3p and related genes was evaluated in a murine AAA model. Dual luciferase reporter gene assay was adopted to validate the targeting relationship between miR-144-3p and enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (EZH2), and the enrichment of EZH2 in the p21 promoter region was determined by chromatin immunoprecipitation assay. MiR-144-3p was highly expressed in AAA tissues. Enhanced miR-144-3p diminished SMC proliferation by binding to the EZH2 3′-untranslated region and thereby inhibiting EZH2 expression. In addition, EZH2 was highly enriched in the promoter region of p21, and knockdown of p21 expression could rescue the effect of miR-144-3p on SMC proliferation and apoptosis. miR-144-3p serves as a promoter for the apoptosis of SMCs, which contributes to the occurrence and progression of AAA. This observation will serve as the basis for further investigations into potential p21-based therapies for AAA treatment.

M6A methyltransferase METTL3-mediated lncRNA FOXD2-AS1 promotes the tumorigenesis of cervical cancer

Recent studies have indicated that long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) and N6-methyladenosine (m6A) methylation modification play critical roles in human cancers; however, their regulation on cervical cancer is largely unclear. Here, our study tries to investigate the underlying mechanisms by which lncRNA FOXD2 adjacent opposite strand RNA 1 (FOXD2-AS1) modulates cervical cancer tumorigenesis. Results illuminated that FOXD2-AS1 expression was significantly upregulated in cervical cancer cells and tissue, which was closely correlated to the unfavorable prognosis. Functionally, gain and loss-of-function assays showed that FOXD2-AS1 promoted the migration and proliferation of cervical cancer cells. Besides, FOXD2-AS1 silencing repressed the tumor growth in vivo. Mechanistically, m6A methyltransferase methyltransferase-like 3 (METTL3) enhanced the stability of FOXD2-AS1 and maintained its expression. Moreover, FOXD2-AS1 recruited lysine-specific demethylase 1 (LSD1) to the promoter region of p21 to silence its transcription abundance. In conclusion, these findings support that METTL3/FOXD2-AS1 accelerates cervical cancer progression via a m6A-dependent modality, which may serve as a potential therapeutic target for cervical cancer.

Generation and characterization of fruitless P1 promoter mutant in Drosophila melanogaster

The identification of mutations in the gene fruitless (fru) paved the way for understanding the genetic basis of male sexual behavior in the vinegar fly Drosophila melanogaster. D. melanogaster males perform an elaborate courtship display to the female, ultimately leading to copulation. Mutations in fru have been shown to disrupt most aspects of the male's behavioral display, rendering males behaviorally sterile. The fru genomic locus encodes for multiple transcription factor isoforms from several promoters; only those under the regulation of the most distal P1 promoter are under the control of the sex determination hierarchy and play a role in male-specific behaviors. In this study, we used CRISPR/Cas9-based targeted genome editing of the fru gene, to remove the P1 promoter region. We have shown that removal of the P1 promoter leads to a dramatic decrease in male courtship displays towards females and male-specific sterility. We have expanded the analysis of fru P1-dependent behaviors, examining male's response to courtship song and general activity levels during12-hour light: dark cycles. Our novel allele expands the mutant repertoire available for future studies of fru P1-derived function in D. melanogaster. Our fruΔP1 mutant will be useful for future studies of fru P1-derived function, as it can be homozygosed without disrupting additional downstream promoter function and can be utilized in heterozygous combinations with other extant fru alleles.

Association between Gene Promoter Methylation and Cervical Cancer Development: Global Distribution and A Meta-analysis.

DNA methylation is the main epigenetic event for gene silencing and is associated with carcinogenesis. In this meta-analysis, we evaluated the association between the methylation of the promoter regions of APC, CADM1, CCNA1, CDH1, DAPK, FHIT, HIC1, MAL, MGMT, hMLH1, P16, PAX1, RAR-β, and RASSF1 genes and the risk of cervical cancer development and progression. Overall, 194 eligible studies were identified assessing the associations of promoter methylation status of aforementioned genes with low- and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL and HSIL) and cervical cancer development. The majority of studies were conducted on Caucasian and Asian populations, whereas rare studies were available on the African population. Promoter methylation frequencies were shown to be significantly higher in LSIL and HSIL cervical cancer cases as compared to control specimens for CADM1, CCNA1, CDH1, DAPK1, FHIT, MAL, P16, PAX1, RAR-β, and RASSF1 genes. A moderate association was found between HIC promoter methylation, whereas APC, MGMT, and hMLH1 promoter methylation was not correlated with cervical cancer development. Promoter methylation could be considered as a noninvasive biomarker for early cervical lesions, making them highly promising targets for a personalized therapeutic approach.

Exosomal miR-218-5p/miR-363-3p from Endothelial Progenitor Cells Ameliorate Myocardial Infarction by Targeting the p53/JMY Signaling Pathway.

Accumulating evidence has shown that endothelial progenitor cell-derived exosomes (EPC-Exos) can ameliorate myocardial fibrosis. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the effects of EPC-Exos-derived microRNAs (miRNAs) on myocardial infarction (MI). A miRNA-Seq dataset of miRNAs differentially expressed between EPCs and exosomes was collected. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) was used to validate the miRNA expression indicated by miRNA-Seq. Immunofluorescence, cell proliferation, and angiogenesis assays were employed to investigate the effects of miRNAs on cardiac fibroblasts (CFs) in vitro. Interactions between miRNAs and their respective targets were examined via immunoblotting, qRT-PCR, and luciferase reporter assays. An MI rat model was constructed, and various staining and immunohistochemical assays were performed to explore the mechanisms underlying the miRNA-mediated effects on MI. miR-363-3p and miR-218-5p were enriched in EPC-Exos, and miR-218-5p and miR-363-3p mimic or inhibitor enhanced or suppressed CF proliferation and angiogenesis, respectively. miR-218-5p and miR-363-3p regulated p53 and junction-mediating and regulatory protein (JMY) by binding to the promoter region of p53 and the 3′ untranslated region of JMY. Additionally, treatment of CFs with Exo-miR-218-5p or Exo-miR-363-3p upregulated p53 and downregulated JMY expression, promoted mesenchymal-endothelial transition, and inhibited myocardial fibrosis. Administration of exosomes containing miR-218-5p mimic or miR-363-3p mimic ameliorated left coronary artery ligation-induced MI and restored myocardial tissue integrity in the MI model rats. In summary, these results show that the protective ability of EPC-Exos against MI was mediated by the shuttled miR-218-5p or miR-363-3p via targeting of the p53/JMY signaling pathway.