Oxaliplatin-containing Regimen Research Articles

Machine Learning Predicts Oxaliplatin Benefit in Early Colon Cancer.

A combination of fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) is the standard for adjuvant therapy of resected early-stage colon cancer (CC). Oxaliplatin leads to lasting and disabling neurotoxicity. Reserving the regimen for patients who benefit from oxaliplatin would maximize efficacy and minimize unnecessary adverse side effects. We trained a new machine learning model, referred to as the colon oxaliplatin signature (COLOXIS) model, for predicting response to oxaliplatin-containing regimens. We examined whether COLOXIS was predictive of oxaliplatin benefits in the CC adjuvant setting among 1,065 patients treated with 5-fluorouracil plus leucovorin (FULV; n = 421) or FULV + oxaliplatin (FOLFOX; n = 644) from NSABP C-07 and C-08 phase III trials. The COLOXIS model dichotomizes patients into COLOXIS+ (oxaliplatin responder) and COLOXIS- (nonresponder) groups. Eight-year recurrence-free survival was used to evaluate oxaliplatin benefits within each of the groups, and the predictive value of the COLOXIS model was assessed using the P value associated with the interaction term (int P) between the model prediction and the treatment effect. Among 1,065 patients, 526 were predicted as COLOXIS+ and 539 as COLOXIS-. The COLOXIS+ prediction was associated with prognosis for FULV-treated patients (hazard ratio [HR], 1.52 [95% CI, 1.07 to 2.15]; P = .017). The model was predictive of oxaliplatin benefits: COLOXIS+ patients benefited from oxaliplatin (HR, 0.65 [95% CI, 0.48 to 0.89]; P = .0065; int P = .03), but COLOXIS- patients did not (COLOXIS- HR, 1.08 [95% CI, 0.77 to 1.52]; P = .65). The COLOXIS model is predictive of oxaliplatin benefits in the CC adjuvant setting. The results provide evidence supporting a change in CC adjuvant therapy: reserve oxaliplatin only for COLOXIS+ patients, but further investigation is warranted.

Real-world evidence of FOLFIRI combined with anti-angiogenesis inhibitors or anti-EGFR antibodies for patients with early recurrence colorectal cancer after adjuvant FOLFOX/CAPOX therapy in Japan: A retrospective observational study using administrative database.

110 Background: Oxaliplatin-containing regimens (FOLFOX or CAPOX) are the most common adjuvant treatments after curative resection of colorectal cancer (CRC). However, real-world evidence (RWE) of treatment sequence/outcomes for patients with early recurrence CRC after receiving adjuvant chemotherapy are limited. Methods: This retrospective cohort study was based on an administrative database in Japan. The primary objective was to describe the treatment sequence for patients with early recurrence CRC and treated by combination of FOLFIRI and anti-angiogenesis inhibitors (AAIs) or anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) after adjuvant FOLFOX or CAPOX therapy. The study included patients with CRC who underwent surgical resection, started adjuvant chemotherapy ≤3 months (mo) after the first surgery, had early recurrence of CRC (defined as initiation of FOLFIRI + AAIs/anti-EGFR mAbs second line [2L] regimen) within 1 year after adjuvant chemotherapy ended. Patient characteristics at baseline of 2L (60 days prior to 2L initiation) and treatment sequence were summarized descriptively; time to discontinuation (TTD) for adjuvant and 2L therapy were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazard model was used to identify risk factors associated with TTD of 2L regimen. Results: The cohort included 832 patients: median (range) age was 67 (24-86) years, 56.4% males, 65.5% with left-sided CRC. Most patients received CAPOX (71.3%) as adjuvant therapy. Median (95% CI) duration of adjuvant therapy was 5.4 mo (5.3-5.5). As 2L therapy, 72.5% and 27.5% of patients received FOLFIRI + AAIs (AAIs group) and FOLFIRI + anti-EGFR mAbs (anti-EGFR group), respectively. Median TTD (95% CI) of the AAIs and anti-EGFR groups in 2L were 6.2 mo (5.8-6.9) and 6.1 mo (5.2-7.4), respectively. Among patients with recurrence within 6 mo (72.6%), the median TTD (95% CI) for AAIs and anti-EGFR groups were 6.1 mo (5.5- 6.5) and 5.8 mo (5.1-7.8), respectively. Among patients with recurrence during 6 to 12 mo (27.4%), the median TTD (95% CI) of AAIs and anti-EGFR groups were 8.1 mo (6.1-9.2) and 6.2 mo (4.6-8.0), respectively. Age ≥70 years was negatively associated with TTD of 2L, HR = 1.19 (95% CI: 1.02-1.39); p=0.03. Conclusions: This is the first RWE based on administrative data on treatment sequence/ outcomes for patients with early recurrence CRC treated by FOLFIRI + AAIs/anti-EGFR mAbs after adjuvant FOLFOX/CAPOX therapy in Japan. The treatment outcomes for patients with early recurrence CRC were similar to previous clinical trials in 2L advanced CRC. The results suggested that these two 2L regimens had similar TTD; however, the timing of relapse may influence the efficacy of AAIs and anti-EGFR mAbs.

Abstract B049: Phase II study of NUC-3373, leucovorin, irinotecan (NUFIRI) + bevacizumab vs FOLFIRI + bevacizumab for the second-line treatment of patients with advanced/metastatic colorectal cancer (NuTide:323)

Abstract Background: NUC-3373 is a phosphoramidate transformation of fluorodeoxyuridine monophosphate (FUDR-MP) designed to replace fluoropyrimidines, such as 5-FU. Fluoropyrimidines predominantly exert their activity via FUDR-MP, which inhibits thymidylate synthase (TS). NUC-3373 has been designed to overcome the shortcomings that limit the clinical utility of 5-FU, such as inefficient conversion to FUDR-MP, generation of toxic metabolites, and a lengthy administration schedule due to poor pharmacokinetic (PK) properties. Promising data have been observed in the NuTide:302 study where heavily pre-treated patients (pts) received NUC-3373 (± leucovorin, LV) or NUC-3373 + LV + irinotecan (NUFIRI), and second-line pts received NUFIRI + bevacizumab (NUFIRI-bev). NUC-3373 was well-tolerated in all combinations. Prolonged stable disease was observed in heavily pre-treated pts, with tumour shrinkages as well as periods of progression-free survival (PFS) longer than those achieved on prior lines. Methods: NuTide:323 is a Phase II, open-label, randomised study of NUFIRI-bev vs FOLFIRI-bev in pts with advanced/metastatic CRC who have previously received ≥2 months of a first-line fluoropyrimidine and oxaliplatin-containing regimen or have relapsed within 6 months of completing adjuvant fluoropyrimidine and oxaliplatin. Pts with measurable disease, ECOG 0-1 and wildtype BRAF are eligible. Pts with MSI-H or dMMR are ineligible. 171 pts will be randomised (1:1:1) to either 1500 mg/m2 NUC-3373 + LV Q1W or 1500 mg/m2 NUC-3373 + LV Q2W, both with 180 mg/m2 irinotecan and 5 mg/kg bevacizumab Q2W or FOLFIRI-bev Q2W. NUC-3373 will be administered over 2 h (vs 46 h for 5-FU). Randomisation is stratified by RAS status, prior bevacizumab and duration of prior line of therapy. Primary objectives are to compare the PFS of NUFIRI-bev to FOLFIRI-bev and determine the optimal NUFIRI-bev dosing schedule. Secondary objectives are to compare the efficacy and safety of NUFIRI-bev to FOLFIRI-bev, and assess the PK of NUFIRI-bev. NuTide:323 is being conducted at 65 sites in Europe and the USA. Clinical trial information: NCT05678257 Citation Format: Richard H Wilson, Kristen K Ciombor, Andrew L Coveler, Janet S Graham, Benjamin L Schlechter, Thomas J George, Elena Élez, TR Jeffry Evans, Jordan Berlin, Aimery de Gramont, Fiona G McKissock, Elisabeth Oelmann, Jeffrey D Bloss, Giulia Martini, Jaafar Bennouna, Dominik P Modest, Julien Taieb, Josep Tabernero. Phase II study of NUC-3373, leucovorin, irinotecan (NUFIRI) + bevacizumab vs FOLFIRI + bevacizumab for the second-line treatment of patients with advanced/metastatic colorectal cancer (NuTide:323) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC Virtual International Conference on Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2023 Oct 11-15; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2023;22(12 Suppl):Abstract nr B049.

Chemotherapy after nivolumab for advanced gastric cancer (REVIVE): a prospective observational study

Nivolumab therapy is a standard-of-care treatment for heavily pretreated patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC). Previous studies have reported improvement in the objective response rate to chemotherapy after nivolumab therapy for other types of cancer. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of chemotherapy after nivolumab therapy in AGC. We conducted a prospective, multicenter, observational study in pretreated patients with nivolumab-refractory or -intolerant AGC. Patients received irinotecan, oxaliplatin-containing regimens, or trifluridine/tipiracil. The primary endpoint was overall survival. A total of 199 patients were included (median age: 69 years; male: 70%; female: 30%). Median overall survival and progression-free survival were 7.5 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 6.7-9.7 months] and 2.9 months (95% CI: 2.2-3.5 months), respectively. Objective response and disease control rates were 16.8% (95% CI: 11.6% to 23.6%) and 18.9% (95% CI: 38.9% to 54.6%), respectively. A prognostic index using alkaline phosphatase and the Glasgow Prognostic Score was generated to classify patients into three risk groups (good, moderate, and poor). The hazard ratios of the moderate and poor groups to the good group were 1.88 (95% CI: 1.22-2.92) and 3.29 (95% CI: 1.92-5.63), respectively. At the initiation of chemotherapy, 42 patients had experienced immune-related adverse events due to prior nivolumab therapy. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia (7.5%), anemia (8.0%), and anorexia (7.5%). The administration of cytotoxic chemotherapy after nivolumab therapy may give rise to a synergistic antitumor effect in AGC. Further investigation is warranted to confirm these findings.

Prior treatment with oxaliplatin-containing regimens and higher total bilirubin levels are risk factors for neutropenia and febrile neutropenia in patients with gastric or esophagogastric junction cancer receiving weekly paclitaxel and ramucirumab therapy: a single center retrospective study

BackgroundWeekly paclitaxel + ramucirumab (wPTX + RAM) therapy is recommended as the standard second-line chemotherapy regimen for unresectable advanced/recurrent gastric cancer (GC) or esophagogastric junction cancer. Recent subgroup analysis of the RAINBOW trial revealed a higher frequency of severe neutropenia due to wPTX + RAM in Japanese compared to Western patients. However, no risk factors for severe neutropenia have been identified.MethodsThis retrospective observational study included patients with advanced/unresectable gastric or esophagogastric junction cancer who received wPTX + RAM after failure to respond to platinum and fluoropyrimidine doublet chemotherapy between June 2015 and April 2020. We conducted multivariable logistic regression analyses to identify the risk factors associated with grade 4 neutropenia and febrile neutropenia (FN). In addition, we investigated the relationship between the number of risk factors and overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).ResultsAmong 66 patients who met the inclusion criteria, grade 4 neutropenia and FN occurred in 21 (31.8%) and 12 (18.2%) patients, respectively. Prior treatment with oxaliplatin-containing regimens was identified as an independent risk factor for developing grade 4 neutropenia (odds ratio (OR) 20.034, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 3.216–124.807, P = 0.001). Total bilirubin of > 1.5 mg/dL (OR 31.316, 95% CI 2.052–477.843, P = 0.013) and prior treatment with oxaliplatin-containing regimen (OR 12.502, 95% CI 1.141–137.022, P = 0.039) were identified as independent risk factors for developing FN. Next, we classified patients with 0, 1, 2 risk factor(s) as RF-0, RF-1, and RF-2 subgroups, respectively, and compared the PFS and OS among the three subgroups. PFS was not significantly different among the three subgroups, whereas OS was significantly shorter in the RF-2 subgroup (median 1.4 month, 95% CI 0.0–5.3 month) than in the RF-0 subgroup (median 10.2 month, 95% CI 6.8–13.5 month, P < 0.01 vs RF-2) and RF-1 subgroup (median 13.3 month, 95% CI 10.9–15.7 month, P < 0.01 vs RF-2).ConclusionsCareful monitoring for grade 4 neutropenia and FN is needed for patients receiving wPTX + RAM therapy who have a history of treatment with oxaliplatin-containing regimens and higher total bilirubin levels.

TP53 Alteration and Its Effect on Pathologic Response Are Associated with Survival after Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases

The aims of this study were to assess the effect of known gene alterations (RAS, TP53, APC, SMAD4, BRAF, and FBXW7) on pathologic response (PR) and their combined association with survival in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CLM). From a prospectively maintained database, we collected data on 458 patients who underwent curative-intent hepatectomy after receiving the first-line preoperative chemotherapy between 2004 and 2020. Major PR was defined as tumor viability of less than 50% in all tumors. Multivariate logistic regression revealed that oxaliplatin-containing regimen (OR: 2.54, 95% CI: 1.58–4.07, P < 0.001), bevacizumab-containing regimen (OR: 2.15, 95%CI: 1.36–3.39, P = 0.001), and TP53 alteration (OR: 0.42, 95%CI: 0.27–0.66, P < 0.001) were independently associated with major PR. Multivariate Cox regression also revealed that patients with TP53 wild-type and major PR (HR: 0.49, 95%CI: 0.31–0.77, P = 0.002) and those with TP53 alteration and major PR (HR: 0.70, 95%CI: 0.49–1.00, P = 0.048) had significantly better overall survival compared to those with minor PR. Further studies targeting the association of TP53 with PR and survival can help clarify the role of TP53 in CLM.

First-line lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy in advanced/metastatic gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (LEAP-015): Safety run-in results.

411 Background: LEAP-015 (NCT04662710) is a randomized, open-label, 2-part, phase 3 study of the safety and efficacy of lenvatinib + pembrolizumab + chemotherapy as a first-line treatment for advanced/metastatic gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. We report findings from part 1, the safety run-in, of LEAP-015. Methods: Eligible patients had untreated, HER2-negative, locally advanced unresectable or metastatic gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma, measurable disease per RECIST v1.1, and ECOG performance status 0 or 1. In part 1, patients received induction with IV pembrolizumab 400 mg Q6W (×2) + oral lenvatinib 8 mg QD + investigator choice of chemotherapy (capecitabine + oxaliplatin [CAPOX] Q3W ×4 or 5-fluorouracil + leucovorin + oxaliplatin [mFOLFOX6] Q2W ×6) and consolidation with pembrolizumab 400 mg Q6W for ≤16 doses + lenvatinib 20 mg QD; dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), defined as selected prespecified grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) or any-grade thromboembolic events, were evaluated for 21 days after the first dose of study intervention. If ≥3 DLTs occurred in either oxaliplatin-containing regimen, then enrollment in part 2 may be delayed to allow for the examination of safety data and to consider design changes. In part 1, the primary end point was safety and tolerability in all patients. Preliminary efficacy was also assessed in part 1. Objective response and disease control rate were assessed per RECIST version 1.1 by blinded independent central review. Results: In part 1, 15 pts received ≥1 dose of lenvatinib + pembrolizumab + chemotherapy. 1 DLT of grade 3 asthenia occurred in the CAPOX cohort and 1 DLT of grade 4 neutropenia occurred in the FOLFOX cohort. Median time from first dose to data cutoff (Oct 13, 2021) was 7 mo (range, 7-9). Treatment-related AEs occurred in 14 patients (93%), with grade 3/4 events in 8 patients (53%). 4 patients (27%) discontinued any drug because of a treatment-related AE, and no patient discontinued all drugs because of a treatment-related AE. No patients died because of a treatment-related AE. No grade ≥3 immune-mediated AEs or infusion reactions occurred. Objective response was reported in 11 of 15 patients (73%; 95% CI, 45-92) who received ≥1 dose of treatment. Disease control rate was reported in 14 of 15 patients (93%; 95% CI, 68-100) who received ≥1 dose of treatment. Conclusions: In the safety run-in of LEAP-015, lenvatinib + pembrolizumab + chemotherapy was associated with a manageable safety profile in the first-line treatment of advanced/metastatic gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. Preliminary antitumor activity was observed for lenvatinib + pembrolizumab + chemotherapy. Part 2 will evaluate the efficacy and safety of lenvatinib + pembrolizumab + chemotherapy versus chemotherapy in this same patient population and patient accrual is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT04662710 .

The Role of microRNAs in Regulating Cancer Cell Response to Oxaliplatin-Containing Regimens.

Oxaliplatin (cyclohexane-1,2-diamine; oxalate; platinum [2+]) is a third-generation chemotherapeutic drug with anticancer effects. Oxaliplatin has a role in the treatment of several cancers. It is one of the few drugs which can eliminate the neoplastic cells of colorectal cancer. Also, it has an influential role in breast cancer, lung cancer, bladder cancer, prostate cancer, and gastric cancer. Although oxaliplatin has many beneficial effects in cancer treatment, resistance to this drug is in the way to cure neoplastic cells and reduce treatment efficacy. microRNAs are a subtype of small noncoding RNAs with ∼22 nucleotides that exist among species. They have diverse roles in physiological processes, including cellular proliferation and cell death. Moreover, miRNAs have essential roles in resistance to cancer treatment and can strengthen sensitivity to chemotherapeutic drugs and regimens. In colorectal cancer, the co-treatment of oxaliplatin with anti-miR-19a can partially reverse the oxaliplatin resistance through the upregulation of phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN). Moreover, by preventing the spread of gastric cancer cells and downregulating glypican-3 (GPC3), MiR-4510 may modify immunosuppressive signals in the tumor microenvironment. Treatment with oxaliplatin may develop into a specialized therapeutic drug for patients with miR-4510 inhibition and glypican-3-expressing gastric cancer. Eventually, miR-122 upregulation or Wnt/β-catenin signaling suppression boosted the death of HCC cells and made them more sensitive to oxaliplatin. Herein, we have reviewed the role of microRNAs in regulating cancer cells' response to oxaliplatin, with particular attention to gastrointestinal cancers. We also discussed the role of these noncoding RNAs in the pathophysiology of oxaliplatin-induced neuropathic pain.

Differences in Toxicity Between Ashkenazi and Sephardic Jews With Colon Cancer Treated With Adjuvant Chemotherapy: A Prospective Study.

Ethnicity of cancer patients is increasingly being recognized as an important factor that may influence intergroup variation in toxicity and efficacy of chemotherapy. Data from our institution suggested that differences in chemotherapy-associated toxicity are not limited to distanced ethnic subgroups, such as Caucasians, Afro-Americans, or Asians, but may exist even between two closely related Caucasian ethnic subgroups, such as Ashkenazi and Sephardic Jews. This study aimed to explore differences in severity and frequency of various side effects, including neurotoxicity between patients from the two Jewish subgroups receiving oxaliplatin-containing adjuvant chemotherapy for colon cancer (CC). We recruited 75 patients, with performance status 0-1 and no background of neuropathy between 2012 and 2016. All patients completed a neurotoxicity questionnaire (NQ) and a QoL questionnaire (QoLQ) at baseline and the NQ also at each treatment cycle; during follow up, patients filled out the NQ and the QoLQ every four months for a total of one year. Of the 75 participants, 66 were evaluable for the study including 34 (52%) Sephardic and 32 (48%) Ashkenazi Jews. Grade ≥2 vomiting and diarrhea occurred more often in Sephardic than in Ashkenazi patients (p=0.008 and 0.012, respectively). Of the 66 evaluable patients, 11 (17%) developed grade 3 neurotoxicity; of these, 9 were Sephardic and 2 were Ashkenazi (p=0.028). There were no significant differences in the dynamics of QoL between both subgroups. Sephardic patients receiving oxaliplatin-containing regimens are at an increased risk for neurotoxicity and other side effects as compared to their Ashkenazi counterparts.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for treatment patients with rectal cancer with adverse prognostic factors: A review

Rectal cancer (RC) is one of the leading tumor location in the structure of the incidence of malignant neoplasms in the Russian Federation and the world. And the standard approach to the treatment of patients with locally advanced forms of RC is preoperative chemo-radiotherapy (CRT) with delayed surgery. The use of such sort of approach in the recent decades has led to the reduction of the frequency of local recurrence up to 10% and even less. However, approximately a third of patients die of distant metastases. In this regard, one of the main tasks in the treatment of patients with locally advanced forms of RC with adverse prognostic factors is the prevention of distant metastasis formation. Early initiation of the systemic therapy before surgery is aimed at solving this issue. Conducting neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) instead of CRT in RC treatment allows to avoid radiation reactions and injuries, occurring in some patients. Two-component oxaliplatin-containing regimens are the most well studied types of NCT in the treatment of patients with non-metastatic RC. In this connection, despite the differences in the treatment regimens and the number of cycles, a good tolerability of the method as well as no effect on the frequency of postoperative complications and in general a satisfactory results comparable to the effects of CRT were observed. The use of NCT in combination with targeted treatment modalities as well as three-component chemotherapy regimens are promising and encouraging treatment options for patients with RC with adverse prognostic factors.

1223P First-line lenvatinib (Len) + pembrolizumab (Pembro) + chemotherapy (Chemo) vs chemo in advanced/metastatic gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: LEAP-015 safety run-in

LEAP-015 (NCT04662710) is a randomized, open-label, 2-part, phase III study of the safety and efficacy of len + pembro + chemo as a first-line treatment for advanced/metastatic gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. We report findings from part 1, the safety run-in, of LEAP-015. Eligible patients (pts) had untreated, HER2-negative, locally advanced unresectable or metastatic gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma, measurable disease per RECIST v1.1, and ECOG performance status 0 or 1. In part 1, pts received induction with IV pembro 400 mg Q6W (×2) + oral len 8 mg QD + investigator choice of chemo (capecitabine + oxaliplatin [CAPOX] Q3W ×4 or 5-fluorouracil + leucovorin + oxaliplatin [mFOLFOX6] Q2W ×6) and consolidation with pembro 400 mg Q6W for ≤16 doses + len 20 mg QD; dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), defined as selected prespecified grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) or any-grade thromboembolic events, were evaluated for 21 days after the first dose of study intervention. If ≥3 DLTs occurred in either oxaliplatin-containing regimen, then enrollment in part 2 was delayed to allow for examination of safety data and to consider design changes. In part 1, the primary end point was safety and tolerability in all pts. In part 1, 15 pts received ≥1 dose of len + pembro + chemo. 1 DLT of grade 3 asthenia occurred in the CAPOX cohort and 1 DLT of grade 4 neutropenia occurred in the FOLFOX cohort. Median time from first dose to data cutoff (Oct 13, 2021) was 7 mo (range, 7-9). Treatment-related AEs occurred in 14 pts (93%), with grade 3/4 treatment-related AEs in 8 pts (53%). 4 pts discontinued any drug because of a treatment-related AE and no pt discontinued all drugs because of a treatment-related AE. No pt died because of a treatment-related AE. No grade ≥3 immune-mediated AEs or infusion reactions occurred. In the safety run-in of LEAP-015, len + pembro + chemo was associated with a manageable safety profile in the first-line treatment of advanced/metastatic gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. Part 2 is currently enrolling and will evaluate the efficacy and safety of len + pembro + chemo vs chemo in this same pt population.

P-125 Phase 1b study of RGX-202-01, a first-in-class oral inhibitor of the SLC6A8/CKB pathway, in combination with FOLFIRI and bevacizumab (BEV) in second-line advanced colorectal cancer (CRC)

A proprietary in vivo target discovery screen identified creatine kinase-B (CKB) as a cancer driver in KRAS mutant (KRAS-mut) CRC. CKB promotes tumor growth and survival under hypoxia. CKB generates the energetic metabolite phospho-creatine (PCr), which is imported into cells through the creatine transporter, SLC6A8. PCr generates intracellular ATP that enables tumoral survival. RGX-202-01 is a small molecule inhibitor of SLC6A8 that depletes intracellular PCr and ATP, resulting in apoptosis. In a completed phase 1a study, RGX-202-01 monotherapy demonstrated objective anti-tumor activity in the relapsed/refractory KRAS-mut CRC setting without dose-limiting toxicity. The objectives of this ongoing phase 1b study are to evaluate safety, PK/PD, and efficacy of RGX-202-01 in combination with standard-of-care (SOC) FOLFIRI + BEV in second-line CRC, a setting where SOC therapy results in an ORR and mPFS of approximately 15% and 6 months, respectively. Subjects with advanced CRC who had disease progression after receiving a first-line oxaliplatin-containing regimen were eligible. As of 02-24-2022, 17 patients (pts) have been enrolled. 8 pts were enrolled in 2 dose escalation cohorts of RGX-202-01: 2400mg BID (4 pts) and 3000mg BID (4 pts) combined with FOLFIRI and BEV. 9 pts were enrolled in the dose expansion phase of the study and received RGX-202-01 3000mg BID combined with FOLFIRI and BEV. No DLTs were observed and the MTD was not reached in the dose escalation phase. Most common G2 TRAEs were nausea and diarrhea (50%) and most common G3 TRAEs were fatigue (12%) and hypertension (12%) There were no Grade 4-5 TRAEs. At the RP2D of 3000 mg BID, PK analysis showed sustained RGX-202-01 drug exposures above target levels (IC50). In addition, Serum and urine creatine measurements indicated robust SLC6A8 target inhibition (in both escalation cohort). 9 pts had KRAS-mut CRC, and all were evaluable for RECIST 1.1 response. 5 of these pts had PR (confirmed) and 4 pts have SD as best response (ORR 56%, DCR 100%). 5 of these pts remain on study for a duration ranging from 15-58 weeks. One patient with a PR at 16 weeks had surgery with curative intent and was observed off therapy with no evidence of disease until week 44 when a CT identified a recurrence. 8 pts had KRAS WT CRC. Of the 5 KRAS WT pts evaluable for response, 1 has a PR on first scan and is ongoing and 4 pts have SD as best response. (ORR 20%, DCR 100%)3 patients remain on study at 8, 20 and 24 weeks respectively. RGX-202-01 combined with FOLFIRI and BEV was well tolerated with no DLTs at the dose levels evaluated which induced potent inhibition of SLC6A8. Encouraging efficacy was observed in patients with RAS mutate mCRC, with 56% response rate exceeding that expected with SOC. Preferential activity in patients with RAS mutated tumors is consistent with pre-clinical studies. Enrollment in the expansion phase continues and a phase 2/3 trial in 2L CRC with RAS mut is planned.

Phase 1b study of RGX-202-01, a first-in-class oral inhibitor of the SLC6A8/CKB pathway, in combination with FOLFIRI and bevacizumab (BEV) in second-line advanced colorectal cancer (CRC).

3579 Background: A proprietary in vivo target discovery screen identified creatine kinase-B (CKB) as a cancer driver in KRAS mutant (KRAS-mut) CRC. CKB promotes tumor growth and survival under hypoxia. CKB generates the energetic metabolite phospho-creatine (PCr), which is imported into cells through the creatine transporter, SLC6A8. PCr generates intracellular ATP that enables tumoral survival. RGX-202-01 is a small molecule inhibitor of SLC6A8 that depletes intracellular PCr and ATP, resulting in apoptosis. In a completed Phase 1a study, RGX-202-01 monotherapy demonstrated objective anti-tumor activity in the relapsed/refractory KRAS-mut CRC setting without dose-limiting toxicity. The objectives of this ongoing Phase 1b study are to evaluate safety, PK/PD, and efficacy of RGX-202-01 in combination with standard-of-care (SOC) FOLFIRI + BEV in second-line CRC, a setting where SOC therapy results in an ORR and mPFS of approximately 15% and 6 months, respectively. Methods: Subjects with advanced CRC who had disease progression after receiving a first line oxaliplatin-containing regimen were eligible. The dose expansion phase of the study was restricted to CKB-expressing CRC tumors. As of 01-14-2022, 16 patients (pts) have been enrolled. 8 pts were enrolled in 2 dose escalation cohorts of RGX-202-01: 2400mg BID (4 pts) and 3000mg BID (4 pts) combined with FOLFIRI and BEV. 8 pts were enrolled in the dose expansion phase of the study and received RGX-202-01 3000mg BID combined with FOLFIRI and BEV Results: No DLTs were observed and the MTD was not reached in the dose escalation phase. Grade 3 TRAEs were observed in 25% of pts. Most common TRAEs were GI in nature. There were no Grade 4-5 TRAEs. PK analysis showed sustained RGX-202-01 drug exposures in both escalation cohorts above target levels (IC50). Serum and urine creatine measurements indicated robust SLC6A8 target inhibition. 9 pts had KRAS-mut CRC, and all were evaluable for RECIST 1.1 response. 4 of these pts had cPR,1 patient had uPR and 4 pts had SD as best response (ORR 56%, DCR 100%). 5 of these pts remain on therapy ranging from 11-54 weeks and a patient with a cPR at 16 weeks followed by surgery with curative intent remains with NED at 24 weeks after surgery. Seven pts had KRAS WT CRC, of which 3 were evaluable (2 pts are pending 1st scan assessment; 2 pts are off study and did not receive 1 full cycle of treatment). Of the 3 KRAS WT evaluable pts, all had SD as best response. 2 were on study for 38 and 24 weeks respectively and 1 is ongoing at 16 weeks. Conclusions: RGX-202-01 combined with FOLFIRI and BEV was well tolerated with no DLTs at the dose levels evaluated which induced potent inhibition of SLC6A8. Antitumor activity was noted in KRAS mutated colorectal cancer, consistent with preferential pre-clinical activity in RAS mutated tumors. Enrollment in the expansion phase continues. Clinical trial information: NCT03597581.

MO1055: Effect of Duration of Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Patients with Colorectal Cancer on the Deterioration of Glomerular Filtration Rate

Abstract BACKGROUND AND AIMS Six-month adjuvant chemotherapy (CTH) is the current standard of care in locally advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). Recent studies have shown that shortening the treatment to 3 months results in moderately worse (0%–4% difference) overall survival. A longer duration of CTH may pose a risk of nephrotoxicity. We aimed to assess the effect of the duration of adjuvant CTH for CRC on kidney excretory function. METHOD We retrospectively studied medical records of 96 patients aged 38–83 (51% males) treated with adjuvant CTH for CRC. Patients underwent CTH either with regimens containing oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil/capecitabine (FOLFOX—31.3%; or XELOX—18.8%) or regimens containing 5-fluorouracil only (5-FU/LV; 50%). Glomerular filtration rate (calculated with the CKD-EPI formula) was analysed in three time points: before CTH, after 3 and 6 months of therapy. The deterioration of eGFR by 1.5 mL/min/1.73 m2 or more after 3 months and by 3 mL/min/1.73 m2 or more after 6 months was considered clinically significant. RESULTS We observed a clinically significant loss of eGFR after 3 months in 56.3% of patients. The risk of eGFR loss after 3 months was not related to gender, CTH regimen, clinical stage, initially low eGFR or comorbidities (P &amp;gt; 0.05). However, the clinically significant loss of eGFR was related to age (mean age 65.1 versus 61.3 years without eGFR loss; P = 0.03). Two-thirds (66.8%) of all patients were assessed in a 6-month time point. In this group, a significant eGFR loss was present in 42.4% of cases. Similarly, eGFR deterioration after 6 months was not related to proposed risk factors such as gender, CTH regimen type, clinical stage, low eGFR or comorbidities (P &amp;lt; 0.05), but was associated with age (mean age 66.3 versus 60.9 years without eGFR loss; P = 0.04). We observed a significant deterioration of eGFR more frequently in patients treated with 5-FU/LV regimens than with FOLFOX or XELOX (P = 0.03). However, patients, who underwent CTH with 5-FU/LV were older (P &amp;lt; 0.001), had lower initial eGFR (P = 0.02) and had hypertension more often (P = 0.03) than patients treated with oxaliplatin-containing regimens. In 92.9% of patients with significant eGFR loss after 6 months, we were able to observe rapid eGFR loss earlier, in a 3-month time point. However, one-third (31.6%) of patients with significant eGFR loss after 3 months did not present it after 6 months (P &amp;lt; 0.001). In patients with significant loss after 3 months, further deterioration after the next 3-month period occurred in 8 cases (21.1%), with a mean loss of 7.7 mL/min/1.73 m2. CONCLUSION Adjuvant CTH for CRC may cause a rapid loss of eGFR. The assessment of eGFR after 3 months of CTH is a predictor of further eGFR decline. Further investigation is needed to conclude if the shortage of CTH duration from 6 to 3 months may be beneficial for older patients in the context of nephrotoxicity.

REVIVE study: A prospective observational study in chemotherapy (CTx) after nivolumab (NIVO) therapy for advanced gastric cancer (AGC).

257 Background: NIVO therapy is a standard care treatment for heavily pretreated patients with AGC. Improvement in objective response rate (ORR) to CTx after NIVO therapy for various cancer types has been reported. However, the efficacy and safety of CTx for AGC after progression on NIVO remains unclear. Methods: The REVIVE trial was a prospective, multicenter, observational study that evaluated the efficacy and safety of CTx in NIVO-refractory or NIVO-intolerant patients (pts) with AGC (UMIN000032182). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) of CTx following NIVO therapy. The median threshold and expected survival times were set as 4.0 and 7.0 months (M). The secondary endpoints are ORR, disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and incidence of adverse events (AEs), including immune-related adverse events (irAEs). CTx consisted of irinotecan alone (IRI), trifluridine/tipiracil alone (FT), and oxaliplatin-containing regimens (OX). Results: Of 395 pts treated with NIVO who met the eligibility at formal registration from Jun 2018 to Sep 2020, 199 pts who received CTx after NIVO were evaluated. Pt characteristics were as follows: median age, 69 years; male, 70%; ECOG PS 0/1/2, 38/51/12%; histology (diffuse/intestinal), 39/59%; metastatic lesions (peritoneum/liver/lung), 38/34/15%; number of metastatic organ sites (0–1/≥2), 40/60%; measurable lesions, 83%; and CTx regimens (IRI/FT/OX), 64/31/5%. Median OS and PFS were 7.5 M (95%CI, 6.7–9.7) at 145 events for OS and 2.9 M (95%CI, 2.2–3.5) at 184 events for PFS. The ORR and DCR were 17.0% (95%CI, 11.6–23.6) and 46.7% (95%CI, 38.9–54.6). Median OS, median PFS, ORR, and DCR according to CTx regimens (IRI/FT/OX) were 8.1/7.1/6.2 M, 3.3/2.8/2.4 M, 18.9/10.9/25.0%, and 47.8/43.5/50.0%, respectively. At the start of CTx, 42 pts had irAEs due to prior NIVO therapy. The most common any-grade and grade ≥3 AEs during CTx included decreased appetite (46% and 7.5%), fatigue (26% and 2.5%), nausea (24% and 1.5%), constipation (16% and 0%), and diarrhea (28% and 4.0%). No treatment-related deaths were observed. Conclusions: Prior NIVO therapy may lead to improved prognosis after CTx without unexpected AEs in pts with AGC, warranting further investigations after NIVO is approved as first-line treatment.[Table: see text]

Clinical implication of adjuvant chemotherapy according to mismatch repair status in patients with intermediate-risk stage II colon cancer: a retrospective study.

BackgroundThe present study evaluated the clinical implications of adjuvant chemotherapy according to the mismatch repair (MMR) status and clinicopathologic features of patients with intermediate- and high-risk stage II colon cancer (CC).MethodsThis study retrospectively reviewed 5,774 patients who were diagnosed with CC and underwent curative surgical resection at Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital. The patients were enrolled according to the following criteria: (1) pathologically diagnosed with primary CC; (2) stage II CC classified based on the 7th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system; (3) intermediate- and high-risk features; and (4) available test results for MMR status. A total of 286 patients met these criteria and were included in the study. ResultsAmong the 286 patients, 54 (18.9%) were identified as microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) or deficient MMR (dMMR). Although all the patients identified as MSI-H/dMMR showed better survival outcomes, T4 tumors and adjuvant chemotherapy were identified as independent prognostic factors for survival. For the intermediate-risk patients identified as MSI-low (MSI-L)/microsatellite stable (MSS) or proficient MMR (pMMR), adjuvant chemotherapy exhibited a significantly better disease-free survival (DFS) but had no impact on overall survival (OS). Oxaliplatin-containing regimens showed no association with DFS or OS. Adjuvant chemotherapy was not associated with DFS in intermediate-risk patients identified as MSI-H/dMMR. ConclusionThe current study found that the use of adjuvant chemotherapy was correlated with better DFS in MSI-L/MSS or pMMR intermediate-risk stage II CC patients.

Safety and efficacy review of aflibercept for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer

ABSTRACT Introduction Anti-angiogenic drugs are an efficacious class of therapy in the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Aflibercept, a vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) trap which binds the angiogenic factors VEGF-A, VEGF-B, and placental growth factor (PIGF) is approved in combination with FOLFIRI chemotherapy following progression after an oxaliplatin-containing regimen. Areas covered This report provides a review of the practice-changing clinical studies which have established the use of anti-angiogenic therapy as second-line therapy in mCRC including aflibercept with FOLFIRI (5FU, leucovorin, irinotecan). This review also evaluates aflibercept with other chemotherapy regimens as well as efficacy and safety data from real-world studies. Expert opinion Aflibercept in combination with FOLFIRI chemotherapy is an established safe and efficacious regimen for the treatment of mCRC as second-line chemotherapy. Although several toxicities have been described, the majority are either low grade or manageable by drug cessation and supportive therapies. For optimal outcomes, patient selection and close observation of toxicities is essential.

Improved Survival over Time After Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases and Clinical Impact of Multigene Alteration Testing in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

BackgroundThe past 20 years have seen advances in colorectal cancer management. We sought to determine whether survival in patients undergoing resection of colorectal liver metastases (CLM) has improved in association with three landmark advances: introduction of irinotecan- and/or oxaliplatin-containing regimens, molecular targeted therapy, and multigene alteration testing. MethodsPatients undergoing CLM resection during 1998–2014 were identified and grouped by resection year. The influence of alterations in RAS, TP53, and SMAD4 was evaluated and validated in an external cohort including patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer. ResultsOf 1961 patients, 1599 met the inclusion criteria. Irinotecan- and/or oxaliplatin-containing regimens and molecular targeted therapy were used for more than 50% of patients starting in 2001 and starting in 2006, respectively, so patients were grouped as undergoing resection during 1998–2000, 2001–2005, or 2006–2014. Liver resectability indications expanded over time. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was significantly better in 2006–2014, vs. 2001–2005 (56.5% vs. 44.1%, P < 0.001). RAS alteration was associated with worse 5-year OS than RAS wild-type (44.8% vs. 63.3%, P < 0.001). However, OS did not differ significantly between patients with RAS alteration and wild-type TP53 and SMAD4 and patients with RAS wild-type in our cohort (P = 0.899) or the external cohort (P = 0.932). Of 312 patients with genetic sequencing data, 178 (57.1%) had clinically actionable alterations. ConclusionOS after CLM resection has improved with advances in medical therapy and surgical technique. Multigene alteration testing is useful for prognostication and identification of potential therapeutic targets.

493P Impact of age on the activity of aflibercept plus FOLFIRI in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): Real world data from the QoLiTrap study

Median ages at CRC diagnosis and death are 67 and 72 years, respectively. Older patients (pts) are underrepresented in clinical trials and often undertreated in daily practice. Here, we report the impact of age on effectiveness, quality of life (QoL) and safety of aflibercept plus FOLFIRI in mCRC pts previously treated with an oxaliplatin-containing regimen.

Clinical Features of Oxaliplatin-induced Hypersensitivity Reactions in Chinese Patients: A Retrospective Multicenter Analysis.

The characteristics of oxaliplatin-induced hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) in Chinese patients were investigated to provide a reference for patients treated with oxaliplatin. The study reviewed the records of patients who developed oxaliplatin-induced HSRs in 17 hospitals from May 2016 to May 2017. We collected and analyzed the basic information, history of oxaliplatin administration and premedication treatments, chemotherapy cycles, HSR symptoms, and the management and outcomes of these patients. Oxaliplatin-induced HSRs were recorded in 137 patients who had been treated with oxaliplatin-containing regimens. Five different chemotherapy regimens were applied. The median infusion cycle when oxaliplatin-induced HSRs occurred was 7, and HSRs occurred during or shortly after oxaliplatin infusion. Most of the patients experienced grade 1 or grade 2 HSRs with mild symptoms of pruritis (49.64%), flushing (46.72%), chest discomfort (26.28%), and urticaria (25.55%). The majority of the patients completely recovered from HSRs following treatment with antihistamines and dexamethasone. Seven patients completed chemotherapy with oxaliplatin after the symptoms resolved with proper management. The results indicate that oxaliplatin-induced HSRs remain an important issue in safely and successfully fulfilling oxaliplatin-containing chemotherapy. Further studies are needed to analyze the risk factors and establish prophylaxis for such reactions.