Oxaliplatin-containing Adjuvant Chemotherapy Research Articles

Association of oxaliplatin-containing adjuvant duration with post-treatment fall-related injury and fracture in patients with stage III colon cancer: a population-based retrospective cohort study

PurposeOxaliplatin-containing adjuvant chemotherapy yields a significant survival benefit in stage III colon cancer and is the standard of care. Simultaneously, it causes dose-dependent peripheral neuropathy that may increase the risk of fall-related injury (FRI) such as fracture and laceration. Because these events carry significant morbidity and the global burden of colon cancer is on the rise, we examined the association between treatment with a full versus shortened course of adjuvant chemotherapy and post-treatment FRI and fracture.MethodsIn this overlap propensity score weighted, retrospective cohort study, we included patients aged ≥ 18 years with resected stage III colon cancer diagnosed 2007–2019 and treated with oxaliplatin-containing adjuvant chemotherapy (oxaliplatin plus a fluoropyrimidine; capecitabine [CAPOX] or 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin [FOLFOX]). Propensity score methods facilitate the separation of design from analysis and comparison of baseline characteristics across the weighted groups. Treatment groups were defined as 50% (4 cycles CAPOX/6 cycles FOLFOX) and > 85% (7–8 cycles CAPOX/11–12 cycles FOLFOX) of a maximal course of adjuvant chemotherapy to approximate the treatment durations received in the IDEA collaboration. The main outcomes were time to any FRI and time to fracture. We determined the subdistribution hazard ratios (sHR) estimating the association between FRI/fracture and treatment group, accounting for the competing risk of death.ResultsWe included 3,461 patients; 473 (13.7%) received 50% and 2,988 (86.3%) received > 85% of a maximal course of adjuvant therapy. For post-treatment FRI, median follow-up was 4.6 years and total follow-up was 17,968 person-years. There were 508 FRI, 301 fractures, and 692 deaths. Treatment with > 85% of a maximal course of therapy conferred a sHR of 0.84 (95% CI 0.62–1.13) for post-treatment FRI and a sHR of 0.72 (95% CI 0.49–1.06) for post-treatment fracture.ConclusionFor patients with stage III colon cancer undergoing treatment with oxaliplatin-containing adjuvant chemotherapy, any potential neuropathy associated with longer durations of treatment was not found to result in greater rates of FRI and fracture. Within the limits of this retrospective study, our findings suggest concern about FRI, while mechanistically plausible, ought not to determine treatment duration.

The association of clinical and patient factors with chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) in colorectal cancer: secondary analysis of the SCOT trial

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a common adverse effect of oxaliplatin. CIPN can impair long-term quality of life and limit the dose of chemotherapy. We investigated the association of CIPN over time with age, sex, body mass index, baseline neuropathy, and chemotherapy regimen in people treated with adjuvant oxaliplatin-containing chemotherapy for colorectal cancer. We carried out secondary analysis of data from the SCOT randomised controlled trial. SCOT compared 3 months to 6 months of oxaliplatin-containing adjuvant chemotherapy in 6088 people with colorectal cancer recruited between March 2008 and November 2013. Two different chemotherapy regimens were used: capecitabine with oxaliplatin (CAPOX) or fluorouracil with oxaliplatin (FOLFOX). CIPN was recorded with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynaecologic Oncology Group-Neurotoxicity 4 tool in 2871 participants from baseline (randomisation) for up to 8 years. Longitudinal trends in CIPN [averages with 95% confidence intervals (CIs)] were plotted stratified by the investigated factors. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was used to analyse the association of factors with CIPN adjusting for the SCOT randomisation arm and oxaliplatin dose. P < 0.01 was adopted as cut-off for statistical significance to account for multiple testing. Patients receiving CAPOX had lower CIPN scores than those receiving FOLFOX. Chemotherapy regimen was associated with CIPN from 6 months (P < 0.001) to 2 years (P= 0.001). The adjusted ANCOVA coefficient for CAPOX at 6 months was-1.6 (95% CIs-2.2 to-0.9) and at 2 years it was-1.6 (95% CIs-2.5 to-0.7). People with baseline neuropathy scores ≥1 experienced higher CIPN than people with baseline neuropathy scores of 0 (P < 0.01 for all timepoints apart from 18 months). Age, sex, and body mass index did not link with CIPN. A neuropathy assessment before treatment with oxaliplatin can help identify people with an increased risk of CIPN. More research is needed to understand the CIPN-inducing effect of different chemotherapy regimens.

Trends and Prescriber Variation in the Duration of Oxaliplatin-Containing Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Stage III Colon Cancer From 2007 to 2019: A Population-Based Retrospective Cohort Study

The International Duration Evaluation of Adjuvant Therapy (IDEA) collaboration in 2017 established 3 months of adjuvant therapy as an alternative to 6 months of therapy for stage III colon cancer. We determined the association between the IDEA publication, changes in clinical practice, and prescriber variation. Using linked databases, we identified Ontarians aged ≥18 years at diagnosis of stage III colon cancer between 2007 and 2019 who received oxaliplatin-containing adjuvant therapy. The outcome was duration of therapy, categorized as ≤25%, >25% to ≤50%, >50% to ≤75%, and >75% of a 6-month course of therapy to approximate treatment durations in the IDEA collaboration. We examined trends in duration over time using an interrupted time series regression model. We analyzed treatment duration after accounting for patient and prescriber characteristics, using multivariable mixed effects logistic regression models to quantify between-prescriber variation. We included 4695 patients with stage III colon cancer who received oxaliplatin-containing adjuvant chemotherapy, of whom 77.5% initiated treatment pre-IDEA and 22.5% initiated treatment post-IDEA. Post-IDEA, there was a 16.4% (95% CI, 12.5%-20.3%) absolute increase in the proportion of patients treated with ≤50% of a maximal course of therapy. This trend was greatest among patients with low-risk tumors. Prescriber variation increased pre-IDEA to 15.6% post-IDEA (variance partition coefficient 5.4% pre-IDEA and 15.6% post-IDEA). The publication of IDEA was associated with increases in short duration adjuvant therapy and prescriber-level practice variation for stage III colon cancer. Clinicians should be better supported to make consistent recommendations about adjuvant duration under conditions of uncertainty and trade-offs.

The Association of Oxaliplatin-Containing Adjuvant Chemotherapy Duration with Overall and Cancer-Specific Mortality in Individuals with Stage III Colon Cancer: A Population-Based Retrospective Cohort Study.

Few studies have examined the relationship between duration of oxaliplatin-containing adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III colon cancer and mortality in routine practice. We examined the association between treatment with 50% versus >85% of a maximal course of adjuvant therapy (eight cycles of CAPOX, twelve cycles of FOLFOX) and mortality in stage III colon cancer. Using linked databases, we identified Ontarians aged ≥18 years at diagnosis of stage III colon cancer between 2007 and 2019. In the primary comparison, we compared patients who received 50% or >85% of a maximal course of adjuvant therapy; in a secondary comparison, we evaluated a dose effect across patients who received FOLFOX in one-cycle increments from six to ten cycles against >85% (more than ten cycles) of a maximal course of FOLFOX. The main outcomes were overall and cancer-specific mortality. Follow-up began 270 days after adjuvant treatment initiation and terminated at the first of the outcome of interest, loss of eligibility for Ontario's Health Insurance Program, or study end. Overlap propensity score weights accounted for baseline between-group differences. We determined the hazard ratio, estimating the association between mortality and treatment. Non-inferiority was concluded in the primary comparison for either outcome if the upper limit of the two-sided 95% CI was ≤1.11, which is the margin used in the International Duration Evaluation of Adjuvant Chemotherapy Collaboration. We included 3546 patients in the analysis of overall mortality; 486 (13.7%) received 50% and 3060 (86.3%) received >85% of a maximal course of therapy. Median follow-up was 5.4 years, and total follow-up was 20,510 person-years. There were 833 deaths. Treatment with 50% of a maximal course of adjuvant therapy was associated with a hazard ratio of 1.13 (95% CI 0.88 to 1.47) for overall mortality and a subdistribution hazard ratio of 1.31 (95% CI 0.91 to 1.87) for cancer-specific mortality versus >85% of a maximal course of therapy. In the secondary comparison, there was a trend toward higher overall mortality in patients treated with shorter durations of therapy, though confidence intervals overlapped considerably. We could not conclude that treatment with 50% of a maximal course is non-inferior to >85% of a maximal course of adjuvant therapy for mortality in stage III colon cancer. Clinicians and patients engaging in decision-making around treatment duration in this context should carefully consider the trade-off between treatment effectiveness and adverse effects of treatment.

SCOT: Tumor Sidedness and the Influence of Adjuvant Chemotherapy Duration on Disease Free Survival (DFS)

AimPatients with loco-regional right-sided colorectal tumors have a worse overall survival (OS). Here we investigate the difference in disease free survival (DFS) between colorectal patients with right and left sided tumors in the SCOT study. MethodsThe SCOT study showed 3-months of oxaliplatin-containing adjuvant chemotherapy (OxFp) is non-inferior to 6-months for patients with stage III and high-risk stage II colorectal cancer. We divided the cohort into patients with left and right sided tumors, and evaluated the effect on DFS and the principle 3 versus 6-months analysis. Results6088 patients with Stage III/high risk Stage II colorectal cancers were randomized between 27th March 2008 and 29th November 2013 from 244 centers internationally. In February 2017 (3-years FU) information on sidedness was available for 3309 patients (1238 R-sided, 2071 L-sided). Patients with right-sided tumors had a significantly worse DFS (3-year DFS right: 73.3% (se = 1.3%), left: 80.2% (se = 0.9%) HR 1.423 (95% CI 1.237-1.637; P < .0001). Adjusting for T and N-stage reduced the HR to 1.230 (95% CI 1.066-1.420, P = .005). The data did not suggest that sidedness affected the impact of chemotherapy duration on 3-year DFS (R: HR 1.024 [0.831-1.261], L: HR 0.944 [0.783-1.139]). Test for heterogeneity, P = .571. Further sub-set analysis was limited due to cohort size. ConclusionsThis is the first study to show that unselected patients with right-sided tumors had a worse DFS compared to left-sided tumors. Tumor sidedness did not impact upon the 3-months versus 6-months comparison in SCOT.

Differences in Toxicity Between Ashkenazi and Sephardic Jews With Colon Cancer Treated With Adjuvant Chemotherapy: A Prospective Study.

Ethnicity of cancer patients is increasingly being recognized as an important factor that may influence intergroup variation in toxicity and efficacy of chemotherapy. Data from our institution suggested that differences in chemotherapy-associated toxicity are not limited to distanced ethnic subgroups, such as Caucasians, Afro-Americans, or Asians, but may exist even between two closely related Caucasian ethnic subgroups, such as Ashkenazi and Sephardic Jews. This study aimed to explore differences in severity and frequency of various side effects, including neurotoxicity between patients from the two Jewish subgroups receiving oxaliplatin-containing adjuvant chemotherapy for colon cancer (CC). We recruited 75 patients, with performance status 0-1 and no background of neuropathy between 2012 and 2016. All patients completed a neurotoxicity questionnaire (NQ) and a QoL questionnaire (QoLQ) at baseline and the NQ also at each treatment cycle; during follow up, patients filled out the NQ and the QoLQ every four months for a total of one year. Of the 75 participants, 66 were evaluable for the study including 34 (52%) Sephardic and 32 (48%) Ashkenazi Jews. Grade ≥2 vomiting and diarrhea occurred more often in Sephardic than in Ashkenazi patients (p=0.008 and 0.012, respectively). Of the 66 evaluable patients, 11 (17%) developed grade 3 neurotoxicity; of these, 9 were Sephardic and 2 were Ashkenazi (p=0.028). There were no significant differences in the dynamics of QoL between both subgroups. Sephardic patients receiving oxaliplatin-containing regimens are at an increased risk for neurotoxicity and other side effects as compared to their Ashkenazi counterparts.

SIOG2021-0027 - Tolerability and feasibility of oxaliplatin-containing adjuvant chemotherapy for elderly patients with colorectal cancer

SIOG2021-0027 - Tolerability and feasibility of oxaliplatin-containing adjuvant chemotherapy for elderly patients with colorectal cancer

The Latest Update of Prognostic Factors of Stage III Colon Cancer Who Underwent Curative Operation and Postoperative Adjuvant Chemotherapy

This study aimed to explore the predicting factor of the poor prognosis of stage III colon cancer. Adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III colon cancer has become popular. However, the choice of the optimal adjuvant chemotherapy regimen still remains unclear. A total of 135 patients with stage III colon cancer, treated with postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy from January 2007 to December 2012 at the Kitasato University East Hospital, were reviewed retrospectively in terms of clinicopathologic characteristics associated with survival and recurrence (median observation: 61 months). We used a multivariate Cox hazards model to identify independent prognostic factors in stage III colon cancer. Of the 135 patients, 38 had recurrence. Five-year overall survival was 83.9%, while 3-year recurrence-free survival was 72.8%. Oxaliplatin-containing adjuvant chemotherapy was almost exclusively applied to stage IIIB colon cancer. Univariate analysis of the negative prognostic factors were N2 (P = 0.0004); operation time (P = 0.0346); tumor size (P = 0.0092); depth of invasion (P = 0.005); histology (P = 0.0403); infiltration type (P &amp;lt; 0.0001); lymphatic permeation (ly3, P = 0.0001); and vascular permeation (v3, P = 0.0005). On multivariate analysis, the independent prognostic factors for relapse-free survival were v3 (P = 0.032) and N2 (P = 0.0216). Combination of the prognostic factors clearly stratified prognosis of stage III colon cancer patients, and those with either factor positive had a poor prognosis despite administration of adjuvant chemotherapy. Both v3 and pN2 may be critical prognostic factors in stage III colon cancer with adjuvant chemotherapy. This information would elucidate areas of concern in the present therapeutic strategy in stage III colon cancer.

Effects of oxaliplatin-containing adjuvant chemotherapy on short-term survival of patients with colon cancer in Dr. Sardjito Hospital, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.

Oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy has been applied as standard treatment for high risk stages II and III colon cancer in many countries. There was no comprehensive report of oxaliplatin use in Indonesia. This research aimed to evaluate the short-term survival of patients with colon cancer treated with such strategy and the prognostic factors. Medical records of patients with colon cancer receiving oxaliplatin-containing adjuvant chemotherapy were retrospectively reviewed. Demography, clinicopathological, and treatment data were collected. Two-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were calculated using Kaplan-Meier method and survival predictors were estimated using Cox proportional hazard models. Data of 81 patients had been included with a median follow-up of 25.2 months. The estimated OS and DFS at 2 years were 75.8% and 72.7%. In multivariate analyses, the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 2 performance status [hazard ratio (HR) =2.967; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.265 to 6.957; P=0.012], T4 stage (HR =2.669; 95% CI, 1.087 to 6.557; P=0.032), and less cycles of chemotherapy administration (HR =3.280; 95% CI, 1.333 to 8.070; P=0.010) were significant independent factors for an increased risk of death. Cases with moderately to poorly differentiated tumors had significantly worse DFS compared with those with well differentiated tumors (HR =3.503; 95% CI, 1.403 to 8.744; P=0.007). Colon cancer patients receiving oxaliplatin-based adjuvant regimens in our clinical practice had 2-year OS rate of 75.8% and 2-year DFS rate of 72.7%. ECOG 2 performance status, T4 stage, and less cycles of chemotherapy administration significantly predicted a poor OS and moderately to poorly histological grade significantly predicted a poor DFS.

Distribution of lymph node metastases and impact on survival benefit of oxaliplatin-containing chemotherapy in stage III colon cancer.

e15683Background: This study investigated the effect of oxaliplatin-containing adjuvant chemotherapy according to the distribution of lymph node (LN) metastases for patients with stage III colon ca...

Oxaliplatin-containing adjuvant chemotherapy improves the survival of locally advanced rectal cancer patients with pathological complete response after pre-operative chemoradiotherapy

BackgroundThe necessity for adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients who achieve pathological complete response (pCR) after pre-operative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is still not identified. We aimed to investigate the therapeutic value of ACT in these patients.MethodsClinical data were retrospectively collected from 105 consecutive LARC patients who achieved pCR after pre-operative CRT and underwent radical tumor resection between December 2008 and April 2014 in a comprehensive cancer center. Perioperative chemotherapy (CT) was administered by combining oxaliplatin with capecitabine (XELOX regimen). Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates of patients with or without ACT were compared.ResultsEighty-three (79.0%) patients received ACT and 22 (21.0%) did not. With a median follow-up of 49 months, the ACT group had a significantly higher 3-year DFS rate (92.8 vs 86.4%, p = 0.029) and 3-year OS rate (95.1 vs 86.1%, p = 0.026) than the non-ACT group. In multivariable analyses, the presence of ACT was an independent prognostic factor for DFS (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.271; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.080–0.916; p = 0.036) but not for OS. This benefit was more obvious in patients younger than 60 years via subgroup analysis (adjusted HR: 0.106; 95% CI: 0.019–0.606; p = 0.012).ConclusionsOxaliplatin-containing ACT may confer survival benefits to patients with pCR, particularly younger patients. However, the routine use of ACT in patients with pCR needs further validation.

3 versus 6 months of adjuvant oxaliplatin-fluoropyrimidine combination therapy for colorectal cancer (SCOT): an international, randomised, phase 3, non-inferiority trial

SummaryBackground6 months of oxaliplatin-containing chemotherapy is usually given as adjuvant treatment for stage 3 colorectal cancer. We investigated whether 3 months of oxaliplatin-containing chemotherapy would be non-inferior to the usual 6 months of treatment.MethodsThe SCOT study was an international, randomised, phase 3, non-inferiority trial done at 244 centres. Patients aged 18 years or older with high-risk stage II and stage III colorectal cancer underwent central randomisation with minimisation for centre, choice of regimen, sex, disease site, N stage, T stage, and the starting dose of capecitabine. Patients were assigned (1:1) to receive 3 months or 6 months of adjuvant oxaliplatin-containing chemotherapy. The chemotherapy regimens could consist of CAPOX (capecitabine and oxaliplatin) or FOLFOX (bolus and infused fluorouracil with oxaliplatin). The regimen was selected before randomisation in accordance with choices of the patient and treating physician. The primary study endpoint was disease-free survival and the non-inferiority margin was a hazard ratio of 1·13. The primary analysis was done in the intention-to-treat population and safety was assessed in patients who started study treatment. This trial is registered with ISRCTN, number ISRCTN59757862, and follow-up is continuing.Findings6088 patients underwent randomisation between March 27, 2008, and Nov 29, 2013. The intended treatment was FOLFOX in 1981 patients and CAPOX in 4107 patients. 3044 patients were assigned to 3 month group and 3044 were assigned to 6 month group. Nine patients in the 3 month group and 14 patients in the 6 month group did not consent for their data to be used, leaving 3035 patients in the 3 month group and 3030 patients in the 6 month group for the intention-to-treat analyses. At the cutoff date for analysis, there had been 1482 disease-free survival events, with 740 in the 3 month group and 742 in the 6 month group. 3 year disease-free survival was 76·7% (95% CI 75·1–78·2) for the 3 month group and 77·1% (75·6–78·6) for the 6 month group, giving a hazard ratio of 1·006 (0·909–1·114, test for non-inferiority p=0·012), significantly below the non-inferiority margin. Peripheral neuropathy of grade 2 or worse was more common in the 6 month group (237 [58%] of 409 patients for the subset with safety data) than in the 3 month group (103 [25%] of 420) and was long-lasting and associated with worse quality of life. 1098 serious adverse events were reported (492 reports in the 3 month group and 606 reports in the 6 month group) and 32 treatment-related deaths occurred (16 in each group).InterpretationIn the whole study population, 3 months of oxaliplatin-containing adjuvant chemotherapy was non-inferior to 6 months of the same therapy for patients with high-risk stage II and stage III colorectal cancer and was associated with reduced toxicity and improved quality of life. Despite the fact the study was underpowered, these data suggest that a shorter duration leads to similar survival outcomes with better quality of life and thus might represent a new standard of care.FundingMedical Research Council, Swedish Cancer Society, NETSCC, and Cancer Research UK.

SCOT: Tumor sidedness and the influence of chemotherapy duration on DFS.

558 Background: Patients with R-sided tumours who develop metastatic disease have a worse prognosis compared to patients with L-sided tumours. The latter may also have a greater benefit from treatment with EGFR inhibitors. In general, registry studies and meta-analyses have shown that patients with loco-regional R-sided tumours have a worse overall survival (OS). This has recently been confirmed by the PETACC8 study but only after they had relapsed. There was not a significant difference in disease free survival (DFS). Methods: The SCOT study showed that 3-months of oxaliplatin-containing adjuvant chemotherapy (OxFp) was non-inferior to 6-months for patients with stage III and high-risk stage II colorectal cancer. Here we divide the population into left and right-sided tumours to see whether sidedness had an impact on DFS. We also evaluated whether sidedness impacted on the 3 vs. 6-months comparison in SCOT. Results: 6088 patients with Stage III/high risk Stage II cancers or the colon or rectum were randomised between March 27, 2008 and November 29, 2013 from 244 centres (164 UK, 32 Australia, 19 Spain, 14 Sweden, 10 Denmark and 5 New Zealand). In February 2017 (3-years FU) information on sidedness was available for 3219 patients (1207 R-sided, 2012 L-sided). Characteristics: Right: median age: 65, Male: 53%, T4 41%, Stage II: 17%; Left: median age: 65, Male: 66%, T4 24%, Stage II: 21%). Patients with R-sided tumours had a significantly worse DFS (3-year DFS right: 73% (se=1%), left: 80% (se=1%). HR 1.401 (95% CI 1.216-1.615; p=0.000004). Adjusting for T and N-stage reduced the HR to 1.215 (95% ci 1.051-1.404, p=0.009). The data did not suggest that sidedness affected the impact of chemotherapy duration on 3-year DFS (R: HR (3 month/6 month) 1.049 (0.849 -1.296) L: 0.910 (0.753-1.099). Test for homogeneity, p=0.327). Further sub-set analysis was limited due to cohort size. Conclusions: This is the first study to show that unselected patients with R-sided tumours had a worse DFS compared to L-sided tumours. This implies that prognosis is influenced primarily by greater recurrence rather than the contributing factors that influence OS. Tumour sidedness did not impact on the 3-months vs. 6-months comparison in SCOT. Clinical trial information: ISRCTN59757862.

Adjuvant colon cancer care quality, risk, value, and level one data and guideline compliance among the elderly privately insured in southeastern USA.

249 Background: Oxaliplatin-containing regimens are among the most efficacious adjuvant treatments for locally-advanced colon cancer, although significant toxicity can occur. Because of relevant level I data, the NCCN revised its guidelines in 2012, recommending omission of oxaliplatin from combination adjuvant chemotherapy regimens for older patients (&gt;70yo) with colon cancer. We examined prescribing behavior of oncologists between 2009 and 2014 to evaluate how rapidly NCCN guidelines were adopted into practice. Methods: This is a retrospective observational study of chemotherapy request data from more than 2,000 community oncologists in the southeastern United States. We examined 57 consecutive months of chemotherapy requests for stage II and III colon cancer patients 70 years and older, based on three epochs. During the middle epoch, one phase III trial evaluating oxaliplatin-containing regimens as adjuvant chemotherapy (NSABP C-07), and a revised 2012 NCCN guidelines, each supported omission of oxaliplatin from adjuvant chemotherapy regimens for older persons with colon cancer. Multivariate analyses evaluated associations among patient characteristics (age, gender, and performance status), disease stage, and time-period, with the odds of receiving oxaliplatin-containing regimens as adjuvant chemotherapy. Results: Among 266 persons with stage II or III colon cancer 70 years of age and older, over the six-year span, most adjuvant chemotherapy requests (184/266, 69.2%) contained oxaliplatin. Older age, male gender, and poor performance status were associated with significantly lower odds of receiving oxaliplatin-containing adjuvant chemotherapy regimens (p&lt;0.05), while time period (epoch) was not significantly associated with temporal changes in patterns of use. Conclusions: Use of oxaliplatin containing adjuvant chemotherapy regimens among older persons with colon cancer did not decrease following publication of phase III clinical trial data and revised NCCN guidelines recommending against oxaliplatin use in this setting. Focused quality improvement initiatives for this population of cancer patients may be helpful.

Oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy without radiotherapy can improve the survival of locally-advanced rectal cancer.

ObjectiveTo assess the impact of oxaliplatin-containing adjuvant chemotherapy on the survival of patients with locally-advanced rectal cancer.MethodsData on patients with pathologically-confirmed T3/4 or N1/2 rectal cancer who accepted radical surgery at our center from January 2002 to June 2009 were reviewed retrospectively. The patients' 5-year overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were analyzed by comparing those who accepted radical surgery only (Group S) with those who accepted radical surgery and oxaliplatin-containing adjuvant chemotherapy (Group SO).ResultsA total of 236 patients were analyzed (Group S 135; Group SO 101). Group S patients were older and had a higher proportion with stage II disease and more perioperative complications than those in Group SO (P<0.05). The OS and DSS of patients with stage III disease under 50 years of age or with mucinous adenocarcinoma were higher in Group SO than Group S (P<0.05). In addition, the OS of patients with stage N2b disease was higher in Group SO than Group S (P = 0.016), and the OS of patients with stage N1a or N2b disease who received more than 8 weeks of oxaliplatin-containing chemotherapy was also higher in Group SO than Group S (P<0.05). Although the OS and DSS of patients with stage II disease in Group SO showed a tendency towards improvement, the differences between the groups were not statistically significant.ConclusionAdjuvant oxaliplatin-containing chemotherapy can improve the survival of patients with locally-advanced low and middle rectal cancers in comparison with observation. Randomized, prospective trials are warranted to confirm this benefit of oxaliplatin for rectal cancer.

Tenth Anniversary of Bevacizumab in Colorectal Cancer: Has it Fulfilled its Promise?

149 ISSN 1479-6694 10.2217/FON.14.6 © 2014 Future Medicine Ltd Future Oncol. (2014) 10(2), 149–152 The addition of bevacizumab to the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer patients reaches its tenth anniversary this year accompanied by somewhat mixed feelings from our perspective and the lack of unanimity among oncologists dealing with this deadly disease. While it has definitely become a new option in many treatment combinations in the advanced disease setting, its strategic positioning is complex and controversial. While some advocate for its wider use in firstand second-line chemotherapy combinations, even continuing it beyond progression, others are more cautious and recommend a more restricted use. Its efficacy has been validated in multi ple Phase III clinical trials with a number of chemotherapy backbone regimens, which provide solid evidence confirming its consistent biological activity and clinical relevance [1–6]. However, not all chemotherapy regimens are the same and bevacizumab has yielded its best, indisputable results in second-line therapy or in combination with chemotherapy backbones that could be viewed as suboptimal, alternative or even inappropriate. Furthermore, it has failed to be of any additional benefit to current standard oxaliplatin-containing adjuvant chemotherapy [7,8] and there are also diverse views on its safety profile. While some physicians claim that it combines well with all chemotherapy regimens without cross toxicities, others emphasize its silent, yet life-threatening class effect cardiovascular adverse events [9]. A clear explanation of the gap between the promising preclinical findings and the limited efficacy of bevacizumab and other angiogenesis inhibitors in the clinic is lacking. Nevertheless, some hints derived from preclinical models regarding the induction of a more invasive phenotype can explain the absence of benefit in the adjuvant setting or, conversely, the higher clinical efficacy in the later advanced settings [10].

Colon Cancer Mutation: Prognosis/Prediction–Letter

We read with great interest the recent study by Gavin and colleagues ([1][1]), who evaluated the prognostic and predictive value of DNA mismatch repair (MMR) status for oxaliplatin-containing adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage II and III colon cancer from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast

Adjuvant chemotherapy containing oxaliplatin without radiotherapy to improve survival of local advanced low and middle rectal cancer.

e14024 Background: In this study, the impact of oxaliplatin on survival of local advanced rectal cancer patients were analyzed by comparing the survival of patients accepted only radical surgery (group S) and patients accepted radical surgery following oxaliplatin-containing adjuvant chemotherapy (group SO). Methods: The data of patients, who accepted radical surgery in our center from Jan 2002 to Jun 2009, were reviewed. Inclusion criteria: carcinoma ≤12 cm from the anal verge; pathologically confirmed T3/4 or N1/2; without history of malignancy; neither transanal nor transsacral resection. Patients who accepted radiotherapy were excluded. The disease specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS) of patients in group S and SO were analyzed. Results: 236 patients were included in analysis (S 135 vs. SO 101), including 11 patients without survival information. The most of patients' basic characteristics were similar in two groups (P&gt;0.05). However, the ratio of stage II patients in group S was higher than that in group SO (51.9% vs. 27.0%, P&lt;0.001). The DSS of group SO were higher in patients with stage II, N1a or mucious adenocarcinoma than patients in group S (P&lt;0.05). The OS of group SO were higher in patients with N1a, N2 or mucious adenocarcinoma than patients in group S (P&lt;0.05). Conclusions: Adjuvant chemotherapy containing oxaliplatin improved survival of local advanced low and middle rectal cancer. Randomized perspective trials are needed to clarify the importance of oxaliplatin for rectal cancer. [Table: see text]

Comparative Effectiveness of Oxaliplatin vs Non–Oxaliplatin-containing Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Stage III Colon Cancer

The addition of oxaliplatin to adjuvant 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) improves survival of patients with stage III colon cancer in randomized clinical trials (RCTs). However, RCT participants are younger, healthier, and less racially diverse than the general cancer population. Thus, the benefit of oxaliplatin outside RCTs is uncertain. Patients younger than 75 years with stage III colon cancer who received chemotherapy within 120 days of surgical resection were identified from five observational data sources-the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry linked to Medicare claims (SEER-Medicare), the New York State Cancer Registry (NYSCR) linked to Medicaid and Medicare claims, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Outcomes Database, and the Cancer Care Outcomes Research & Surveillance Consortium (CanCORS). Overall survival (OS) was compared among patients treated with oxaliplatin vs non-oxaliplatin-containing adjuvant chemotherapy. Overall survival for 4060 patients diagnosed during 2004-2009 was compared with pooled data from five RCTs (the Adjuvant Colon Cancer ENdpoinTs [ACCENT] group, n = 8292). Datasets were juxtaposed but not combined using Kaplan-Meier curves. Covariate and propensity score adjusted proportional hazards models were used to calculate adjusted survival hazard ratios (HR). Stratified analyses examined effect modifiers. All statistical tests were two-sided. The survival advantage associated with the addition of oxaliplatin to adjuvant 5-FU was evident across diverse practice settings (3-year OS: RCTs, 86% [n = 1273]; SEER-Medicare, 80% [n = 1152]; CanCORS, 88% [n = 129]; NYSCR-Medicaid, 82% [n = 54]; NYSCR-Medicare, 79% [n = 180]; and NCCN, 86% [n = 438]). A statistically significant improvement in 3-year overall survival was seen in the largest cohort, SEER-Medicare, and in the NYSCR-Medicare cohort (non-oxaliplatin-containing vs oxaliplatin-containing adjuvant therapy, adjusted HR of death: pooled RCTs: HR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.70 to 0.92, P = .002; SEER-Medicare: HR = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.60 to 0.82, P < .001; NYSCR-Medicare patients aged ≥65 years: HR = 0.58, 95% CI = 0.38 to 0.90, P = .02). The association between oxaliplatin treatment and better survival was maintained in older and minority group patients, as well as those with higher comorbidity. The addition of oxaliplatin to 5-FU appears to be associated with better survival among patients receiving adjuvant colon cancer treatment in the community.

Comparative Effectiveness of Oxaliplatin vs Non–Oxaliplatin-containing Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Stage III Colon Cancer

Comparative Effectiveness of Oxaliplatin vs Non–Oxaliplatin-containing Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Stage III Colon Cancer